WLC serving multiple sites

Is there a way to stop the broadcasting of certain SSID's on certain access points? The customer has a WLC deployed at their main location, with a few APs hanging off of it at a remote. It would be nice if the remote location only broadcasted the networks it can support locally. Thanks!

You need to use ap groups.
Here is a config example: www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk722/tk809/technologies_configuration_example09186a008073c723.shtml
HTH
Amjad
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App

Similar Messages

  • One WLC 5508, Multiple Sites/Networks

    So I'm trying to think this design out in my head.  Here is what I have:
    Corp Office with a WLC 5508 configured with a management port and a guest WLAN port for guest wireless etc to the corp Layer 3 switch in a wireless VLAN, using 802.1q trunk of course.  The WLC is configured to be a DHCP server for the Guest WLAN.
    (Side note:  the sites are connected using WAN routers at each location configured with bundled T3's and all routes are setup and each network successfully traverses to the other)
    First phase will be to install 30 APs.  5 at the corporate office and 25 and two other sites.  I'm using a class A network but have subnetted the networks so to speak to make each site have multiple VLANs using class C networks.  I want to be able to implement the WLC 5508 at the corporate office and manage the APs centrally at all locations.  The APs are already configured for lightweight mode and I have successfully configured 5 of them and connected. 
    My question is if I install the other 25 APs at the other 2 offsite locations and connect them to the network, will it automatically contact the WLC and get a DHCP address from the Corporate WLAN DHCP even though it is at another site?  Am I overlooking a step or configuration method for this type of implementation?
    Thanks for all contributions!

    Ok so I have configured my environment as suggested.  I can see the new IP Address lease to the AP at my remote site on
    the DHCP Server (Windows Server DHCP at the remote site).  I can ping that IP from the Central office to the remote site however the WIreless Controller is not associating the AP at all.  Although I can ping the AP from the WLC.  I checked the logs and I dont see any association attempt from that IP or MACt.  So here is what I have:
    Central Site-
         WLC 5508 With Internal DHCP for local APs
         APs associating successfully
    Remote Site
         Windows DHCP with Option 43 Configured per Cisco AP Option 43 Whitepaper
         AP 1142-Light-Weight attached to switchport (Wireless Vlan configured) and reachable via ping through all of network.
         AP obtained IP from Windows DHCP from Wireless Scope I configured successfully.
    So it doesn't seem the CAPWAP tunnel was built successfully.  I do have an ASA 5520 in the environment but all traffic to remote sites is wide open as I do not block any ports so CAPWAP traffic should flow well.
    Mission a step?
    Dee

  • Share files over multiple sites

    Hello everybody,
    Is there a way to use a single file from multiple sites without having to maintain them twice?
    For example I want to use the same PHP-functions in two projects (include file).
    Is there a Dreamweaver-technique which allows me to use and upload a file, that is outside of the site-root-directory.
    Librarys? Templates?
    greeting

    Is there a Dreamweaver-technique
    Firstly, this has nothing to do with Dreamweaver, so no, there isn't a DW technique. This depends on your webserver and operating system.
    The solution also depends on what kind of file you are trying to share, and if the websites are on the save server. HTML/CSS can't normally access files outside the web root, so, for instance, you can't normally share a CSS file between websites (but there is a workaround using aliases). PHP files don't have this limitation, as long as they are on the same server.
    I took a quick look at the Google hosted libraries. It looks like it is all javascript. Javascript doesn't have the same limitation that PHP has. For instance, Lots of people reference a remote copy of jQuery in their web pages.
    There is a method of sharing files across servers that involves configuring the receiving server to accept the remote file. I experimented with this some years ago but can't find any info on it now. Sorry, I can't even remember what the technique was called.  It wasn't easy to get it to work with all browsers as they have different security policies.

  • How do you setup multiple sites to allow for code promotion?

    I am somewhat frustrated with the single site flow of the Dreamweaver Site Manager in helping me manage a full development to production code cycle.  Ideally I need to have multiple sites managed by Dreamweaver that are just different stages in the code lifecycle.  Currently DW only supports local_file -> production.  Instead I need (and this is sort of standard for software product systems) to have my local sandbox, a test site, a beta site and a production site.
    In the normal dev cycle I would work in my sandbox and have DW synchronize with my test site  ( allows scripts that need a full server to be tested in case my local machine is not running a full server ).  I can do this today with DW.  When I am ready I want be able to have DW synchronize with my beta site (might very well be on a different server via FTP) so that my users/customers can review, test and approve the changes.  When everyone has signed off I then want DW to promote this code to the production site.
    Now I can do this manually but DW seems to have 95% of the capability in place (mostly the synchronization logic).  Is there a way to have it also manage/synchronize the beta and production sites?
    Thank You

    Richmaster wrote:
    turingtest, I do have a couple questions. 
    Number one, does everyone in your family only sych their ipods from only 1 computer?  If everyone only uses itunes from 1 computer I can see how that will work.  But what if kids want to use itunes for windows?  Will "Home Sharing" allow all their music purchased on the MAC, to be also displayed on their itunes for windows laptop?  I noticed you have PCs and also an ipad.  How do you manage your family's music on these devices?
    Also, how did you first get everyone's music library into their own library?  Drag & drop?  Is the "grouping field" you mentioned under "view", then "view options"?  What does this do? 
    Thanks.
    Sorry I missed your post earlier. Normally I follow up on any replies. This one must have fallen off the page on a busy day.
    As my kids have left home I have created for them a complete clone of the familiy library, then deleted the tracks from it they don't want. Over time their libraries will divirge, but if needs be they can still update their devices using the library at home. Handy when eldest's kit was stolen.
    Grouping is just another property, useful because it isn't generally overwritten by other software but is stored in the tags, so preserved when you copy files from one place to another. You can make the column visible and edit for multiple tracks in Get Info. Some software calls the same field "mood" or "sub-genre". iTunes has a specialist purpose for it generally used with classical music, but it doesn't seem to work very well for that and I don't use it that way.
    tt2

  • Noob needs help with hosting multiple sites

    Hello I am new to this multi hosting. I have looked on the forum for answers but haven't found any. I am trying to figure out how to host multiple sites. I have my dns working for my default site "example1.com", but need to know if I need to add another dns record for my second site. "example2.com". Also when I point to the new fold that has the second site in it and I assign it port 82 for testing purposes I get an error message saying 403 access forbidden. I need to find out how get permission to view the site for the public. Its in a separate folder on an external hard drive right now for testing purposes. Can any body help me or point me in the right direction? Thanks so much!!!
    -Kcam1999

    {quote}
    While what you are telling him is technically functional, it is not correct
    I beg to differ, Paul. You are the one that is not correct.
    CNAMES have been deprecated as of some years ago
    What? huh? really?
    Please show me any official document that states this (and not someone who just started a rumor because he didn't understand them). Indeed, the DNS RFC makes no such claim.
    {quote}
    I stand very much corrected. CNAMEs are not officially deprecated. Interestingly, your post cites precisely what happens when CNAMES used carelessly. How many transactions are needed to resolve Apple's CNAME chain below? RFC1912 (http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1912.html) has some recommendations that suggests Apple's own network folks have, like me and perhaps even others here, some learning to do. Is that a 'best practice?'
    {quote}> Then make sure you tell Apple since this site depends on the use of CNAMEs:
    dig discussions.apple.com
    discussions.apple.com. 492 IN CNAME discussions.apple.com.edgesuite.net.
    discussions.apple.com.edgesuite.net. 4427 IN CNAME a1399.b.akamai.net.
    a1399.b.akamai.net. 2 IN A 128.241.220.82
    a1399.b.akamai.net. 2 IN A 128.241.220.72
    In fact, it uses TWO CNAMES in a chain. Oh my.{quote}
    From RFC1912 (which I'm sure many have now read here), section 2.4 is as follows:
    {quote}... having chained records such as CNAMEs pointing to CNAMEs may
    make administration issues easier, but is known to tickle bugs in
    some resolvers that fail to check loops correctly. As a result some
    hosts may not be able to resolve such names.{quote}
    {quote}> It is not valid to say "don't use these because they could cause problems'. A records can be just as problematic, as can PTRs. Let's not even talk about MX.{quote}
    How, exactly, does is an A record problematic? No chains, no additional lookups, no wasted cycles...
    We differ here -- and if we are dealing with a newbie, we don't need to enter into unnecessary complexity UNTIL it is a requirement for their solutions.
    {quote}> There are many valid reasons to use CNAMEs in DNS, not least of which is the ease of moving a service if it uses CNAMEs. For example, if you have 10 A records all pointing at the same server and you want to migrate to a different machine you have to locate and update all 10 records. If they used a CNAME to the physical server you could move them all at once using a single change. This is especially important in cross-domain links where you may not control all the origin zone files.
    {quote}
    You're somewhat reaching here, and it is well beyond the scope of the OP's post or needs (well, until they tell us more about their needs, I suppose). There is nothing difficult about 'finding' and updating the necessary records. The final example you gave is a good one and I'll say THAT is an appropriate use of a CNAME, 'though there are other workarounds for it.
    Thanks for keeping me honest.

  • Best practice for running multiple sites on 1 CF install?

    Hi-
    I'm setting up a new hosting environment (Windows Server 2008 Standard 64 bit VPS  configuration, MySQL, IIS 7, CF 9)
    Has anyone seen any docs or can anyone suggest best practices for configuring multiple sites in this environment? At this point I'm thinking simple is best, one new site in IIS for each client (domain) and point it to CF.
    Given this environment, is anyone aware of any gotchas within the setup of CF 9 on IIS 7?
    Thank you in advance,
    Rich

    There's nothing wrong with that approach. You can run as many IIS sites as you like against a single CF install.
    As for installing CF on IIS 7, I recommend that you do the following: install CF 9 without connecting it to IIS, then installing the 9.0.1 upgrade and any hotfixes, then connecting CF to IIS using the web server configuration utility. This will keep you from having to install the IIS 6 compatibility layer that's needed with CF 9 but not with CF 9.0.1.
    Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
    http://www.figleaf.com/
    http://training.figleaf.com/

  • Multiple sites on CRM-ISA web proxy IIS

    Hello,
    We're upgrading to CRM v6 (2007), with Internet Sales / Web Channel B2B in scope. As part of the system landscape, we have a Windows server running IIS acting as a web proxy.
    Now, the question is, can we share this web proxy so that it works for multiple sites?
    We would like to put the Dev and the QA CRM systems to both use the same web proxy, which would have two sites configured in it.
    Has anyone done this before? Success or fail? I could not find any docu from SAP telling whether or not this would work.
    Also are there any requirements for the version of the IIS?
    We're currently on Win2k / IIS v5 but are going to Win2003 / IIS v6.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Rasmus

    I figured it out:
    You need to change which URL the site responds to under the 'Aliases' section.
    I haven't seen this anywhere else, so I hope this will help someone along the line...

  • Setup ACE probe for HTTP host headers for multiple sites on rservers

    We have multiple sites on each server. Is there a way to have the probe only stop traffic to a specific site or header and not take the complete rserver offline?
    Thanks
    Greg

    If you are running multiple web servers on same servers using same IP addresse on the server. Then Host header field differentiate these web instances on the same physical machine.
    Use header command under http probe definition to send appropriate HOST value with probe rquest
    e.g
    probe http site1
    interval 2
    faildetect 1000
    passdetect interval 2
    passdetect count 1
    header Host header-value "www.site1.com"
    expect status 200 200
    probe http site2
    interval 2
    faildetect 1000
    passdetect interval 2
    passdetect count 1
    header Host header-value "www.site2.com"
    expect status 200 200
    HTH
    Syed iftekhar Ahmed

  • URL prefix under IIS for multiple sites

    I'm trying to set up DW8. I webmaster a large number of sites
    for clients using a variety of hosting companies and web servers. I
    use IIS under Win2K Pro.
    Pre-DW, my setup has been to have a test area with folders:
    Inetpub\wwwroot\site1, Inetpub\wwwroot\site2, etc. To test I browse
    to localhost/site1, localhost/site2, etc. Then I copy the files to
    another part of the disk: websites\site1, websites\site2, editing
    them to change directions to the include files (sometimes I work in
    ASP, sometimes in PHP). Even with a utility we've made special for
    this task, this is a ROYAL PAIN. Then I upload site1 to server1,
    site2 to server2, etc.
    I have to do it this way because IIS will only recognize one
    website at a time, and I jump around from site to site so often
    it's a real pain to turn the sites on & off via the Control
    Panel.
    Now I'm trying to set up site definitions on DW8. For Site1 I
    say the URL is www.site1.com, the local testing spot is
    Inetpub\wwwroot\site1, and it gives me this "site URL prefix for
    the testing server does not match the site URL prefix specified in
    the HTTP address". What do I do? What have you-all found is the
    easist approach:
    1. fool DW about where files are kept?
    2. Do the PITA switch between which site IIS thinks is
    "live"?
    3. host a local multi-site server?

    > I have to do it this way because IIS will only recognize
    one website at a
    > time
    Fix:
    http://mnteractive.com/archive/running-multiple-sites-on-win2k-and-xp/
    -Darrel

  • LDAP design question for multiple sites

    LDAP design question for multiple sites
    I'm planning to implement the Sun Java System Directory Server 5.2 2005Q1 for replacing the NIS.
    Currently we have 3 sites with different NIS domains.
    Since the NFS over the WAN connection is very unreliable, I would like to implement as follows:
    1. 3 LDAP servers + replica for each sites.
    2. Single username and password for every end user cross those 3 sites.
    3. Different auto_master, auto_home and auto_local maps for three sites. So when user login to different site, the password is the same but the home directory is different (local).
    So the questions are
    1. Should I need to have 3 domains for LDAP?
    2. If yes for question 1, then how can I keep the username password sync for three domains? If no for question 1, then what is the DIT (Directory Infrastructure Tree) or directory structure I should use?
    3. How to make auto map work on LDAP as well as mount local home directory?
    I really appreciate that some LDAP experta can light me up on this project.

    Thanks for your information.
    My current environment has 3 sites with 3 different NIS domainname: SiteA: A.com, SiteB:B.A.com, SiteC:C.A.com (A.com is our company domainname).
    So everytime I add a new user account and I need to create on three NIS domains separately. Also, the password is out of sync if user change the password on one site.
    I would like to migrate NIS to LDAP.
    I want to have single username and password for each user on 3 sites. However, the home directory is on local NFS filer.
    Say for userA, his home directory is /user/userA in passwd file/map. On location X, his home directory will mount FilerX:/vol/user/userA,
    On location Y, userA's home directory will mount FilerY:/vol/user/userA.
    So the mount drive is determined by auto_user map in NIS.
    In other words, there will be 3 different auto_user maps in 3 different LDAP servers.
    So userA login hostX in location X will mount home directory on local FilerX, and login hostY in location Y will mount home directory on local FilerY.
    But the username and password will be the same on three sites.
    That'd my goal.
    Some LDAP expert suggest me the MMR (Multiple-Master-Replication). But I still no quite sure how to do MMR.
    It would be appreciated if some LDAP guru can give me some guideline at start point.
    Best wishes

  • Iweb 09 multiple sites and domains

    I have had one iWeb site working properly for the last few years with past iweb versions with no problems. I purposely upgraded to 09' so I could publish multiple sites with individual domains. I created a second and third site and they seemed to up load ok via either the iweb FTP or Cyberduck. (Im not using Mobile me) When I'd go to the web page all I'd see was "under construction". I triple checked if erverything was loaded correctly on the server. They looked just like the original site that had been working and was in the right order.
    I got on the phone with Apple yesterday for nearly 3 hours and two different techs. After all their help/suggestions I seemed to have lost my original working site. The site (.sites) shows up in the iWeb library folder and when I click on it to open, iWeb seems to be opening okay as I can see the file menu. However there is NO WINDOW. All I see is my desktop like the window was closed or something. (It wasn't) I've clicked on my other (non working) sites from the same iWeb folder and they open up just fine.
    Needless to say, my original problem has now turned into two problems. Apple is confused and has turned the issue over to an engineer and I am waiting to hear back. The tech told me Apple might be adding a software fix soon because others have had uploading multiple sites issues.
    Has anyone had a similar experience or suggestions? I'm proficient on the machine but this is ridiculous.

    My suggestion would be to ignore the iWeb FTP until it works.
    I still keep my sites on separate domain files, publish to a folder and optimize and upload with Web Site Maestro.
    Until Apple fixes their FTP and adds optimization or rebuilds iWeb to create less cumbersome files, this feature is useless to anybody who wants their website to download in a reasonable time and have an even chance of loading in IE.

  • Iweb 09_good for multiple site designs

    Hi!
    I am looking to upgrade to a better imac and iWeb 09 to create "microsites" for my current print design clients to help expand their marketing. Is this version of iWeb easy to use for that or does it to multiple sites at all? Basically I am asking is this version a good one for multiple site building? Ease of use for that purpose? Thanks!

    Welcome to the Apple Discussions. iWeb 09 can handle multiple sites quite easily. However, a lot depends on where you plan to host the sites and manage them. Will they each have a domain name for the site?
    On MobileMe you can have only one site with CNAME domain name forwarding to the same account. The others must use the standard html URL forwarding. AND they all must be created in the same Domain.sites2 file. That can be a problem.
    If you use the standard domain name forwarding with MMe for all the sites then you can have a separate domain file for each client and use Web Site Maestro to manage then them and select which one to open and work on.
    If each client will provide their own hosting server then it's possible that CNAME forwarding can be used for each client if they have a domain name and their server supports CNAME.
    I use iWebSites to manage over 75 individual sites. It lets me create multiple sites and multiple domain files.
    This lets me edit several sites and only republish the one I want.
    OT

  • Multiple sites (w/o using iWebsites)

    I'd like to use iWeb to publish multiple sites. I've already created one site, and would like to add one or two more. (Incidentally, I'm using Godaddy, not MMe, to host).
    I've found the question asked and answered using iwebsites.
    I'm wondering, is there a simple way to publish multiple sites w/o using a 3rd party app? I imagine I could just create several domain files, one for each site, and segregate them like that. However, I'm concerned about messing things up, so i figured I'd ask for precise instructions from the wise and helpful group.
    Without using iWebsites, what would be the steps to create additional sites in separate domain files, and what would be the best way to organize and work with them?
    Thanks!

    Kurt Weber wrote:
    While all this is well and good isn't it rather a pain? I continue to renew MobileMe, not because it is a better web hosting service, but out of sheer convenience. Updating a site can take only a few seconds with the help of the "publish" button.
    I honestly expected publishing to Godaddy to be much more difficult than it was. I got up and running almost immediately, and the benefits of hosting my site outside the aegis of MMe is worth it to give up the one-click convenience. From what I can tell lurking in this forum, I would find some of the restrictions and workarounds dealing with MMe more of a pain than hosting elsewhere. I realize some people's needs might be better met by MMe, but mine are better met with Godaddy.
    And now that I've gotten one site up and running, I need to make another! (And don't want to mess up the first).
    You can create multiple sites from within iWeb. In the file menu select "New site." If you using domain forwarding you should be able to direct users to this new site and keep it separate from your other site. All these sites would be on the same server and be updateable with one click.
    I'd prefer to keep different projects in different documents rather than cultivate a multi-headed hydra of a domain file. I'm not sure I'd want to update everything with one click! With Godaddy, my URLs and page titles are standard, I can poke around in the published folder and tweak HTML, and my site searched high when I googled it 2 days after publishing.
    I have three different sites going, one for our church using domain forwarding, and two that I use and direct users to by sending them the longer address. (I am cheap... I don't want to buy another domain.)
    The important thing is it works for you!
    I have a MMe account and plan to use it for a future site I'll create in iWeb. But for my current sites, I'd rather use a 3rd party.

  • Re: Need Help With Helpdesk w/ Multiple Sites

    We thought about this, but we want one central website for all the end-users to go to. Is there any way to then (depending on what location the user sets on their ticket) to send to one of these Spiceworks sub-sites?
    I was thinking about make a rule to CC# the distribution list of that IT department so they are notified that there is a new unassigned ticket. For example end user selects Florida location for their ticket on our portal, then the Florida IT distribution list is CC'd to notify them. 
    Or am I thinking wrongly here.

    Hello,
    Getting ready to move our helpdesk into primetime. We have a central server where all of our admins from around the world will be working on our tickets and we have a public facing (remote site) helpdesk where all end-users will be submitting their tickets to.
    Since we have multiple locations each with their own IT staff, I would like to have end-user select their site (I already created a custom ticket attribute list for this that shows up on our public portal). Once this is done, somehow alert that IT staff that their is a ticket (maybe by sending an email to that IT's distribution list) and organize the tickets on the central helpdesk server by site.
    Any help in this would benefit our company utilizing our Spiceworks helpdesk.
    This topic first appeared in the Spiceworks Community

  • Clarify posting multiple sites...

    I have searched the forum high and low without getting a clear and definite answer to this question.
    Basically, I want to use iWeb to build and maintain several web sites. I have had success separating the sites using iWebSites. All I want to do is use my existing .mac server space to host several sites, which will be accessed by entering in a purchased domain name, which will forward you to that address. However, I do want one web site to be available for access directly (web.mac.com/username). The others can have a long and rediculous address, as they will be accessed by entering in another name anyhow.
    Whenever I publish one site or the other, it overwrites the one I previously posted. I can't figure out how to get web.mac.com/username to count for one of the sites, and then the subsites to be at other addresses.
    Is this possible using iWeb 1.1.2?
    I would appreciate any help. Thanks a lot.

    o.k. firstly, the only reason for using one of these multisite domain programs is if you need to keep the sites separate due to size and the added time it takes to publish when there are lots running at one time or if you are publishing them to separate webspaces. Otherwise iWeb is quite happy running more than 1 site all open at one time in the application. they are listed down the main panel on the left.
    I have created a few sites from one Domain file (iWeb file) that when published all upload to .mac in 1-click, but are basically separate sites see links for examples on my .mac account.... (1 even has a separate password)
    http://web.mac.com/dandid/iWeb/Site/
    http://web.mac.com/dandid/iWeb/links%20page
    http://web.mac.com/dandid/iWeb/654/
    http://web.mac.com/dandid/iWeb/bunyan/
    If all your sites require .mac features, or you want to have them ALL hosted on .mac (regardless of the original website address) then the best way is simply to keep all of them in the same iWeb Domain, i.e. just add new sites within the iWeb application, just as apple intended.
    In addition to multiple sites in my main .mac area, I personally have a number of separate sites run using separate Domain files.
    from these I publish to various places on the net by publishing to a local folder and using and ftp program to upload the HTML files. I only use these from separate Domain files so that I can make changes to some of the small sites without having to wait for iWeb to generate HTML for loads of sites at once.(my mac is slooooow)
    You can open any number of separate sites either by manually moving the domain file within your library/application support/iWeb or by using one of the 'multisite' programs to manage them for you. Then you can use the 'publish to folder' command to prepare all the web ready html files etc to a local folder on your mac. You will then manually upload the files to your sites.
    I'd read the help files for how apple actually intends you to manage more than 1 site if you still don't get it, because if you want them all on .mac anyway, it works pretty well just as they planned it.
    or mail me if you want more help - [email protected]
    hope this helps

Maybe you are looking for