WM - chenge in block structure (increase in SUTs)

Hi gurus,
i want to increase the Storage unit (stacks ,stacks hight). This customisation allows me to chenge the block structure. But gives an error while creating TO.
'block structure coincide with SUTS'
Now i gone through diff documents & come to know that we require to empty the storage bins under that storage type.
At present setting for the storage unit is active.
Can you suggest any other method to increase the SUTs ( i.e. 10 to 15) & also tell me the how to make the bin empy & fill it again after chenge in the block structure(as the number of bins are more).
Waiting for reply
Thanks,
Dev
Edited by: dev .. on Nov 4, 2008 7:59 AM

There is some discussion of this on the Idea Exchange:
http://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW-Idea-Exchange/Size-to-Contents-feature-for-BD-constants/idi-p/115200...

Similar Messages

Error in new block structure

Hi all,
For the Bulk storage type which is maintained for SUT active I have defined new Block Structure.
**Increased the SU 15 to 25.
But system giving Error while creating TO by LT06.
Error
"Storage unit type T01 not compatible with current block definition."
Message no. L3425
Diagnosis
The storage unit type of the first storage unit to be put away determines how many storage units can be put away in one storage bin. If a storage unit with a different storage unit type is put away in this storage bin and the maximum number of storage units per block is the same as the first unit, then the system allows this.
In this case, the storage unit type of the storage unit to be put away is not the same as the storage unit type of the existing storage unit. Therefore, the definition of the maximum number of storage units per block is different.
Procedure
Put this storage unit away in a different storage bin.
*the error comes even after defining the new st bin
Edited by: dev .. on Aug 7, 2008 2:27 PM

hi
See the hierachy version or hierachy levels in both sides.
Are they in same version and trying to upload data for the correct level
Hope this helps
Regards
Ganesh N

Error in Block Structure

Hi all,
I have defined new Block Structure But system giving Error while creating TO by LT06.
Error
"Storage unit type T01 not compatible with current block definition
Edited by: dev .. on Aug 6, 2008 12:08 PM

only Sol is to empty all the bins & chenge the structure

Conditional formatting over block structure is not working properly

Hello there,
This is on BPC 7.5 NW.
We have used block structure in one of our reports for Account dimension. i.e. we have used EVRNG function for MemberSet instead of any other expansion.
Again in this Block structure we have applied the below conditional formatting for some range.
The rule is:-
If the value (which is fetched using EVGET function in this range)
    1. is less than 0.45 then apply Icon1
Else
apply
    2.icon2 if values lies in between 0.5 and 1.5
    3.icon3 if value lies between 1.5 and 2.5
    4.icon 5 if value lies between 2.5 and 3.5
So when the report is expanded, the icons are getting displayed as above conditional formatting only if the number of rows (data range) is less than 1000. If the number of rows exceeds 1000 i.e. then it displays values only not the icons.
Can anyone please suggest what might have gone wrong here.
Thanks
Lakshmi

Hi Nilanjan,
Please find here the screenshot of the conditional formatting used.
the cell values here are got by EVGET function.
So when the block gets repeated ,if the expansion crosses more than 1000 rows , then we are facing the issue of getting only values instead of arrows(icons mentioned in the above condition).
Thanks
Lakshmi

How to prepare Block Structure data for D/A output from DIAdem

Dear Sir:
I'm trying to do D/A convert from DIAdem and DAQCard6062E,whereas when I located the data file to be output, and specified the channel, DIAdem gave the Error as following:
--Error-- DIAdem
Error from DAC simulation input file(read data file)
The DAT file'...'must have Block Strucure!!!
What I want to know is how to prepare or how to save my *.tdm file to a file of Block Strucure.
Thank you very much
jing

Hi jing,
i think there´s no chance to do online reading with tdm-files.
There are two ways to solve your problem:
1. Using the "channel simulation block" to read data out of DIAdem data cache.
2. Store as DAT.File named in 8.3-notation using block-format.
I don´t know the english menue-items, but all you need is in the Files.menu selection "DAT-Files".
By the way:
If you change the setting in the "datastorage-dialog" from "data area" to "file" for recording data, you´ll get a "playable" DAT-File.
CU
Martin

Nilsa_VZ , i want to reply to your post "Incoming Call Block Limit Increased to 100 from 10" but...

you created a locked post in a new thread? how can you get any meaningful feedback like that?
i wanted to ask why i get error when i try to store more than 10 thru the myfios tv onscreen menu, while
i can enter more than 10 numbers thru use of web interface. do you know how i can get my fios tv onscreen
menu to accept and store more than 10 numbers to block calls from?
ÔƹÔ

does anyone else know how?
ÔƹÔ

Differentiate oracle 9i & 10g block size/structure

Is there any difference between block structure of oracle 9i & 10g?

user11720163 wrote:
Is there any difference between block structure of oracle 9i & 10g?Same question asked by Satish? Why , if any is there even, it would matter to you as a dba or developer? You won't deal with blocks but with the objects isn't it?
HTH
Aman....

Block stuctue & storage type search

Hi all,
1. In case storage type (SUT managed ) with bulk structutre for e. g.
For tote the block structure is defined as 12*6=72
For pallate its defined as 2 * 1 = 2
Now ,
Does the system allow Keeping the tote of 72 SUT & also keeping the pallate of 2 at same time ?
If above scenario is not possible.
Is it possible to keep single pallate 1 & in remaining space 36 totes.
2. I have defined three storage type for the search strategy st1,st2,st3.
but even the empty storage bin is available in the st1 while creating TO its taking st3.
What could be the resons?

Hi dev,
Can you please explain how did you solve this issue?
Regards,
Prakash

My First while loop inside PL/SQL block not working , please help

Hi ,
I am new to PL/sql and struck at PL SQL blocks , please help to solve this .
declare
v_A number constant :=10 ;
j number constant := 3 ;
BEGIN
WHILE j < v_A
LOOP
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Hai');
END LOOP;
END;
please help as how to resolve this .
Thanks in advance .

btw it's a useful habit to use indentation to highlight the block structure. Also it's worth deciding what your convention will be for keywords (I use uppercase, lowercase is also fine as far as I'm concerned but I've set up my editor to uppercase them) and variables, database object names etc (I use lowercase), e.g:
DECLARE
   v_a CONSTANT PLS_INTEGER := 10;
   j   CONSTANT PLS_INTEGER := 3;
   i PLS_INTEGER := j;
BEGIN
   WHILE i <= v_a LOOP
      DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE(i);
      i := i +1;
   END LOOP;
END;or perhapsdeclare
   v_a constant pls_integer := 10;
   j   constant pls_integer := 3;
   i pls_integer := j;
begin
   while i <= v_a loop
      dbms_output.put_line(i);
      i := i +1;
   end loop;
end;When I see "declare" and "BEGIN" in the same block of code I worry about the standard of code I'm going to see...

How to query two data blocks simultaneously?

Dear all,
Need your inputs on the following problem statement...
Existing Functionality:
We have two data blocks A (Parent) and B (Child) in a relationship. Both data blocks refer to different tables.
Data block A is the query data block and for a single record in block A we can have multiple records in block B. Multiple records in block B are shown one at a time after executing a query, this is implemented by using a list item C (belongs to a third block).
For example
Let us say block B can have 5 different types of entries for each record in block A. In this case the list item C will have 5 values corresponding to these entries. Once the query is executed, block B will show the default entry for the queried record in block A. To see other entries for the record user can select the required value in list item C and corresponding entry in block B will be fetched.
Requirement:
Our requirement now is to enable querying upon both data blocks A and B simultaneously. To implement this I replaced data blocks A and B with a single data block X which is based on the join of the two tables referred by the Data blocks A and B earlier. As the fields should allow insert, update, delete operations we did not use a view here.
Issue:
Now the problem is, each record in block A for which block B had multiple entries earlier is now getting listed multiple times because of the join.
I have tried but could not find any solution for this. I would appreciate if any of you can suggest how we can query both blocks simultaneously without affecting the existing functionality.
Thanks,
Amit

I don't understand your requirement in detail. I try to repeat what i understood so far.
You have a master-block A based on a table A and a detail-block B based on a table B. So far so good. You can now query based on conditions just the datablock A, because B is a detail and therefore can only be queryied in context of block A.
Your reuirement is to query on both blocks A and B and find block in B also without giving conditions for the relevant block A.
Is it that ?
What i don't understand, what is block C used for?
An idea for the querying of block B's data: Create Non-database-items items in block A for the search-criteria you need on block B and make them Queryable.
In the PRE-QUERY-trigger on block A build a WHERE-condition if that search-criteria is entered, something like
IF :BLOCK_A.SEARCH_CRITERIA_FOR_BLOCK_B IS NOT NULL THEN
SET_BLOCK_PROPERTY('BLOCK_A', ONETIME_WHERE, 'WHERE PKVALUE IN (SELECT FKVALUE_TO_A FROM TABLE_B WHERE FIELDVALUE=' ||:BLOCK_A.SEARCH_CRITERIA_FOR_BLOCK_B)');
END IF;This would query also records to A for which you want to have the B-records. So you could keep block-structure up to master-detail.

Multiple selection in a detail block

In a scenario where there is a master-detail-detail block structure, is it possible to select several records of the first detail block and enter a record for them in the second detail block?
Thanx in advance.
P.S. please excuse me if the question sounds weird.

use this code: i used this for multiple selection in a detail block to delete the selected record. the trick is u need to create a Check box.
DECLARE
Num_Total_Records NUMBER;
Num_Loop_I NUMBER;
BEGIN
GO_BLOCK(<BLOCK_NAME>);
FIRST_RECORD;
LAST_RECORD;
Num_Total_Records := TO_NUMBER(NAME_IN('SYSTEM.CURSOR_RECORD'));
FIRST_RECORD;
FOR Num_Loop_I IN 1..Num_Total_Records LOOP
IF <CHECKBOX> = 1 THEN
<................................................>
END IF;
NEXT_RECORD;
END LOOP;
<................................................>
END;

Forms Data-Block based on stored procedures - REF CURSOR feature NOT FUNCTIONING

This topic is related to another topic in this forum titled "FORMS HOW TO SET QUERY SOURCE ARGUMENTS??" I posted my message there as well. I am posting as a NEW TOPIC so that it catches the attention of Oracle Support.
I built a data form based on a stored procedure and REF CURSOR IN OUT parameter.
My procedure takes a IN parameter to fill in the criteria for the OPEN <cursor_variable> select ... where ... statement.
In the Value setting of the Query source Arguments , I set the VALUE to ":BLOCK_NAME.ITEM_NAME" at design time to supply the input value to the procedure. this works to the extent of making available the form item value to the stored procedure parameter. I verified this by doing an insert into some debug table , of the incoming parameter value inside my stored procedure.
The cursor gets opened properly into the REF cursor variable. I verified this by fetching a record into a local variable and inserting the value into a debug table again in the stored procedure.
(I took care to close and re-open the REF cursor variable again - so that the front-end can continue to fetch it from the first record. )
***** PROBLEM **************
But the front end forms runtime is giving me a FRM-40301 - query returned no records even though the REF cursor is returned properly opened.
Did anybody else face the same problem ??
Please post what you found.
Thanks,
Shankaran
null

This topic is discussed at length in another thread "How Set Value For Query DataSource Arguments?"
But I am posting the findings here as well.
THIS TOPIC IS CLOSED.
My Bad. The problem Cause : I did not include all columns in the
cursor rowtype in the Data-block. In the wizard for the data block , I selected ONLY the columns that I needed. But I was doing a Select * from <my_table> in my open cursor <Cursor-Variable> .... The <Cursor Variable>
itself was declared <my_table>%rowtype
FIX : The Data Block structure (columns included as items) should match the cursor record Structure. One may or may not
display all the columns in the LAYOUT though.
But I don't understand why it gives such a misleading message like FRM-40301 Query retrieved no records. Oracle Team fix it.
Hope this helps people who face the same problem.
Thanks,

Can tablespace block size different from the database block size

I have a 10.2.0.3 database in Unix system.
I created a database used default block size of 8k. However, the client application requires 16k block size database. Can I work around to create a tablespace that has 16k block size instead of drop the database to recreate the database.
Thanks a lot!

As Steven pointed out, you certainly can.
I would generally question, though, whether you should.
- Why does the application require 16k block sizes? If this is a custom application, it almost certainly doesn't really require 16k blocks. If this is a packaged application, it probably doesn't really require 16k blocks. If 16k blocks are a requirement for support, I would wager that having the application's objects in 16k block size tablespaces in a database with 8k blocks would not be supported.
- Mixing block sizes increases the management complexity of your database, potentially substantially. You need to specify a completely separate buffer cache for the 16k blocks, a buffer cache that would not be integrated with Oracle's automatic SGA management functionality. Figuring out how to split up the buffer cache between 8k and 16k blocks tends to be rather hard (particularly if the mix changes over time), which means that DBAs are going to be spending substantially more time managing the SGA in this sort of system than in a vanilla 10.2.0.3 system. And that DBAs will have many more opportunities to set things up incorrectly.
Justin

Load File Data Block

Hi.
i want to load cap file (binary code) to java card(GP 2.1.1).
load file data block means binary code of cap file , right?
and im wondering how do i change structure for BER-TLV?
binay codes are [50 4B 03 04 14 00 08 00 08 00 CF 56 86 3D 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ....]
80 E8 00 00 FA C4 *82 0A 29* 50 4B 03 04 14 00 08 00 08 00... (binary code)...
i found out tag"82" means have length with 2 more byte (0x0A29 for now)
do i need to add to load file data block structure somthing else ?
thanks

845467 wrote:load file data block means binary code of cap file , right?AFAIK no, not whole cap file. You have to find in cap file components such as "header.cap", "directory.cap" and others and download only them. These components are described in JCVM specification. You must download them in order defined in specification.
845467 wrote:80 E8 00 00 FA C4 82 0A 29 50 4B 03 04 14 00 08 00 08 00... (binary code)...APDU must look something like that
80 E8 00 00 FA C4 82 XX XX 01 YY YY DATA 02 ZZ ZZ DATA ....
XX XX - lenght of C4 tag
01 YY YY - name and length of header.cap component
02 ZZ ZZ - name and length of directory.cap component
Note, debug.cap and descriptor.cap are optional. In case of JCOP cards they are downloaded out of C4 tag.

Block with parforeach, howto exit ?

Hi All,
For an approval Workflow , i tried to use the block step with parforeach in order to allow parallel processing. I want to come out of the block as soon as one of the approvers has Rejected the decision.
Following problems i am facing.
->Condition within the parallelprocessing tab to come out of the block: no effect
->Since i am using this approval workflow as a subworkflow so i thought to complete the workflow using process control and setting a flag variable but process control with complete workflow as the processing is setting the WF status to Logically deleted and hence the Main Workflow is also logically deleted.
Any solution Please ?
Thanks
LS

Hi Linda
Normally this is how it works (they way you want) and not logically deletes itself.
I created an example and here is the result
How the WF was setup:
Workflow Design:
The above sets container element APPROVED to NO in the rejection branch
Parallel Processing Tab in the Block header:
Binding between main WF and the Block structure... take note of what is being bound:
Setting of the Agents in the Decision Step which is inside the block for parallel processing
Are we doing the same or are we assigning AGENTS table here in the above decision step? That's where it tends to get Logically Deleted in case of end condition.
Regards,
Modak

WM - chenge in block structure (increase in SUTs)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for