WM/IM Stock mismatch

Hi,
I've got a problem as we have a stock mismatch between WM & IM as a result of an issue with stock write on for Go Live.
When the stock was written into the live box via a 561 mvt, the WM functionality didn't run.
Config had to be tweaked to activate the WM piece.
We then cancelled the 561, but this created a negative entry in the storage type 998 - Aufnahme.
When the stock was re-entered on IM, the WM side didn't match due to this entry.
Have tried every trick I know to correct the WM stock.
Does anyone know how to correct/amend WM bin stock without adjusting IM stock???
Thanks,
Kathryn

you loaded the stock in MM as the warehouse was not assigned to the location in table T320, hence only MM was updated with quantity, WM not.
Then you assigned the warhouse to the location.
then you cancelled your initial stock load, which in turn removed quantity from MM AND from WM as WM was active at this point of time.
Result was 0 stock in MM and negative stock in 998 WM
Then you load stock again, so stock in MM became positive while in WM it became just zero.
This was a wrong cycle, you should not have activated the WM link before cancelling the initial stock.
You should have done this activation after cancellation of initial load, and before doing the new load.
To correct the situation you have to cancel your load again and redo you load.
this time, start with removing the assignmen.
then cancel you material documents.
this will result in zero stock in MM and zero stock in WM.
Then switch on the assignement.
then load your stock again.
Here you can read alternative options for datam migration with WM.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_40b/helpdata/es/dc/1939516e36d1118b3f0060b03ca329/content.htm

Similar Messages

Physical stock mismatch to sap stock

Dear Experts,
I have a scenario where there is difference in stock amount to that of in SAP by 3.
Phisically stock existed as 3 but in SAP stock existed as 6.
Later we came to know that 3 materials are stolen.
Now I want to know how to tackle this issue, if it is related to physical inventory management, please let me know how to reduce this stock or how to handle this scenario.
Provide me detailed solution for this..
Regards
Lakshminath Gunda

Dear Lakshminathan,
use physical inventory process (movement type is 701)
.....but you can as well post a goods issue to cost center (201) or scrap it with 551.
Create a physical inventory document via MI01.
count it and enter the result via MI04.
Post the difference via MI07 Or all in one via MI10.
regards,
Pravin Kadam

Stock Mismatch at Plant level and Serial Number Collection

Hi,
I'm working on with the material stocks in my application. For the serialised material (MATNR = 50004050), I'm gettting the plant level stock as 20 and the corresponding serial numbers collection for the same material is 27 which is wrong. Since the plant level stock and the serial number collection should be one and the same
I'm using MARA, MARC table for getting the plant level stock and EQUI and EQBS table to get the serial number collection. If I increase the stock using the transaction 'MB1C' and movement type '561', the serial numbers which I'm giving for the serialised material is coming in the serial number collection but the plant level stock still in the previous value itself. If I raise the stock for the serialised material, the plant level stock also should get updated.
Please let me know, how can I get the stock equal in both plant and serial number collection.
Thanks in Advance,
Mohan.

This could happen, if the status of serial number is wrongly updated to ESTO. From where are you taking serial numbers?Physically what is right the qty showing plant stock or the qty showing serial number? May be you go and check the history of the serial number to see if it is really available in stock.
Also it can be serial number is optional so though the stock is reduced but serial number is not captured while issuing so the stock at plant level is less but serial number is more,
If this is the case, reconciallation directly from tables will be difficult.
Regards
Sangeeta
Edited by: Sangeeta Khurana on May 4, 2011 12:34 AM

Stock mismatch in plant during PGI

I have a scenario wherein i have 990 quantity in unrestricted stock of my plant. I create an outbound delivery for 990qty from this plant. so now there is no stock in the unrestirted use for this material . But when i create another STO, create delivery for 100 qty and try to specify batch, an error occurs in VL02n that there is 73 kg of stock available and if i change the stock to 73 the error is gone. But i can't specify batch since i do not see any available stock. please help.

Hi,
Charu if your material is not batch managed it may be split valuated and
73kgs may be with different valuation type
Please check and confirm
BR
Diwakar

Stock blocking two times

Dears
Pls see my scenario and advice me how to procees
While RR i found that my material was rejected, so during UD i put the material in block stock and same time i create a automatic notification via defect recording and save the notification and finally UD was given rejected
No i want to send back this material to vendor
SO in QM02 t code i call the notification created before and i want to create a return delivery from notification so i need to put again this material in block stock via action box to make enabled return delviery
Why system make us to block two time for the same matrial
pls give your valuable idia on this...or wether i am following any wrong methde
Faisal

Hello Faisal,
It may not be referred as wrong practice. At the same time itu2019s really difficult to predict the exact logical reasoning behind this.
I think, if you notice rejection at incoming stage u201CReturn Deliveryu201D is the field that SAP suggest to utilize and if you notice the same after UD it should be through quality notification. But there is no sound base for this statement. Letu2019s wait for the opinions of experts.
1.     While carrying out incoming inspection when I notice any non conformity and want to send back the material to vendor, I would utilize the field u201CReturn Deliveryu201D in QA11 which in turn executes 122 movement in background.
2.     But when I am not sure that immediately it should be sent back or not, I would follow the path you mentioned. Posting to block stock through QA11. Later through MIGO return delivery can be carried out with 122 movement by opting stock type as block stock.
3.     Generally later case is more popular may be because of 2 reasons.
a.     No direct involvement of QA dept for stock reducing movement.
b.     Reduces the chances for physical and system stock mismatch. (When you carry out 122 through QA11, system stock reduces immediately; but physically it gets moved out may be after a week or two depending upon logistic arrangement for multiple material codes)
Regards,
Anand Rao

Issue in creating a STO Delivery

Hi
We are trying to create STO delivery for a particular product.
There is enuf stock for the product in the supplying plant, however there is no STO delivery created and control returns back to R/3 with BAPI_APO_ATP_CHECK error.
One peculiar thing abt the product is that the product has a field SATNR( Cross reference plant - which is populated with a configurable product.
The configurable product is maintained in APO.
Can you provide any leads what possibly could be the reason and if anyone has faced this kind of issue.
Thanks
Amruta

Hi Amruta,
There could be reasons like mismatches in stock, mismatches in sto between ECC and APO which can leads to non-delivery creation. Also, please check whether the stocks are placed in storage location which will be recognized by APO for delivery creation. The error you have received indicates that either the stock or the sto is not available at ATP during ATP check performed during delivery creation.
Regards
R. Senthil Mareeswaran.

"initial non-cumulative for non-cumulative values" is not available in DTP (0AFMM_C02)

Hi Experts,
We are working for BI implementation for AFS Industry,
when we are working on AFS specific inventory cube 0AFMM_C02 , we are facing stock mismatch problem
for AFS Stock initialization we are using the data source 2LIS_AF_STOCK_INITALIZATION instead of 2LIS_03_BX, this data source is specificly designed for AFS
when we are extracting the data using 2LIS_AF_STOCK_INITALIZATION for stock initialization and
2LIS_03_BF data source to load the Moments.
we compressed cube with Marker update for 2LIS_AF_STOCK_INITALIZATION data load(by deselecting the No marker update check box)
we compressed cube with No Marker update for 2LIS_03_BF historical data load(by selecting the No marker update check box)
we compressed cube with Marker update for 2LIS_03_BF Delta data load(by deselecting the No marker update check box)
Now we are facing stock mistach problem, we found reason for this
"initial non-cumulative for non-cumulative values" option is not available in DTP only Delta & Full options are available
and infopackage of 2LIS_AF_STOCK_INITALIZATION data source also has "Full update" instead of "Generate Intial Status"
Please let us know how can we get the "initial non-cumulative for non-cumulative values" option in the DTP level.
Regards,
Chandra

Hi Chandrakumar,
We are facing the same problem, how do you solve it?
Regards,

Messages stuck with status "WAITING"

Hi Everyone,
We have implemented PI interface a year ago with JDBC sender (ORACLE) and RFC receiver (SAP) to transfer the goods movements from legacy to SAP and give back the current stock after the goods movement is posted back to ORACLE system.
The interface has been working fine for over an year now but suddenly since 15days we are experiencing the issue of delays in message transmission where-in in SXMB_MONI we see a time difference of 60-90mins between start message start time and end time...
Nothing has been changed from development/design perspective and am unable to understand the reasons for this delay.
Also for the above scenario the message status in MESSAGE MONITORING shows waiting status and i have cross verified for any errors and could not find any errors in given time.
also MDT Screen shot for your reference
I am struggling to figure out the reasons and this is causing stock mismatch between Oracle system and SAP and has become show stopper.
Please guide me in identifying the root cause and fixing this...
Thanking you all in anticipation of help...
Lakshmi

hi Claudia,
I have cross verified both and as you can see there are no errors
a
and finally the XML
couldn't figure out why this delay happening... One thing after an hour or so... the things get cleared as one in executing state finishes leading to others to finish.. but by then they are getting accumulated
Appreciate any guidance to figure out the root cause...
Thanks in advance
lakshmi

Write-off Storage Type 999

Dears,
The customer accidentally wrote off the complete Storage Type 999 via LI21.
We were able to retrieve the full list of articles and quantities of what was written off. In order to restore the situation, we would like to 'refill' Storage Type 999 with these articles.
Could someone please advice on how to accomplish this? (Inventory on all involved articles is too time-consuming)
Thanks in advance.
M

As per Jacob suggestion you can go with 711 if 712 is posted or 712 if 711 is posted but the basic question is if there is no stock mismatch then why the stock was there in 999 is there any business need to store the stock in 999 as per standard SAP 999 is resolution and ideally if any stock exist then you should reconcile that

Blocking two javascripts (conflicts)

I have been working with JavaScript and ORACLE portal, recentlly with add a new javascript that is a secuencial slide images, in the same page where I have a random images script . The new script block the random image script, The workaround that I done only divide the scripts in:
secuencial.html
secuencial.js
random.html
random.js
But the result is the same the codes are the next:
The integrated secuencial slide show code:
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<SCRIPT language ="javascript">

</SCRIPT>
</head>
<body>
</body>
</html>
The integrated Random images code is the next
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Exalumnos </TITLE>
<SCRIPT LANGUAGE="JavaScript" >

</script>
</HEAD>
<BODY OnLoad="rotateImage('rImage')">
<img name="rImage" src="http://www.domine.com/pls/portal/docs/PAGE/SWF/BANNERS/EXALUMNOS/00.JPG" width=250 height=350>
<title>Exalumnos</title>
</body>
</html>
Some one have information about this conflict?

Hello Faisal,
It may not be referred as wrong practice. At the same time itu2019s really difficult to predict the exact logical reasoning behind this.
I think, if you notice rejection at incoming stage u201CReturn Deliveryu201D is the field that SAP suggest to utilize and if you notice the same after UD it should be through quality notification. But there is no sound base for this statement. Letu2019s wait for the opinions of experts.
1.     While carrying out incoming inspection when I notice any non conformity and want to send back the material to vendor, I would utilize the field u201CReturn Deliveryu201D in QA11 which in turn executes 122 movement in background.
2.     But when I am not sure that immediately it should be sent back or not, I would follow the path you mentioned. Posting to block stock through QA11. Later through MIGO return delivery can be carried out with 122 movement by opting stock type as block stock.
3.     Generally later case is more popular may be because of 2 reasons.
a.     No direct involvement of QA dept for stock reducing movement.
b.     Reduces the chances for physical and system stock mismatch. (When you carry out 122 through QA11, system stock reduces immediately; but physically it gets moved out may be after a week or two depending upon logistic arrangement for multiple material codes)
Regards,
Anand Rao

Consume chemical without component bom

Dear Gurus,
there is paint shop in my company, sometime we have to do cleaning operation in paint bath some chemicals are consume in this operation, this activity done once in a week and presently we have comsume these chemicals by our component bom. But now some stock mismatch happened in system because the chemical consumed physically is not same as defined in bom and these chemical consumption is not fixed.
is there any scenerio by which we can declare cleaning as seperate task and consume chemical which is actually used.
thanks in advance,
arun

Helle Arun
Yes it is quite possible to consume these chemicals without them being components on a BOM. It sounds like the cleaning operation is not specific to a particular product being produced and could be treated as a general maintenance task associated with the Machine rather than any particular production order.
I suggest you treat the chemicals as a consumable item, ie say you use five gallons per clean and if it comes in a 20Gallon container you issue that completely to floor stock when you need a full container on the floor as you use a portion each week nothing is transaacted in the system , when the container is empty you withdraw another 20 gallon container from the stores, which will issue this full amount. You could simply do a MIGO 201 to a cost center or set up the kanban replenishment functionality
in this approach the actual use per clean and the cost per clean will be treated as an over head and not directly into the product cost.
you could also use a production or maintenance order specifically for the cleaning task and keep it separate from the product cost.
Alternatively if the cost of these chemicals is significant and you want to distribute this over the actual product cost on teh production order then you can add additional components not ont the BOm to the production order and record actuals. however cleaning chemicals sounds like a classic floor stock item
Hope this helps
Jerome Mungapen

Mismatch between serial number masters & its stock

Hi,
For a plant A000 and storage location 0001, when i execute MMBE i am finding stock as 1 in un-restricted stock.
But when is check iq02 and check number of serials exist for the Material Master, i find 3.
Could some one tell me why there is a mismatch
Regards

Hi,
This difference will come when the user creates new serial numbers during the goods movement, for example lets say if the current stock is '3' and user issued some '2 quanities for consumption. While issuing the materials if he used the option 'create automatic serail numbers' function instead of taking the serial numbers from the existing stock, then the system creates new serial numbers and issued with the stock quantity. Because of this, you will see the current stock as '1' with three serial numbers.
Actually the system should not accpet the newly created serial numbers for issues when your settings are correct.
Please check the serial number usage for the serial profile used in the material master in the below SPRO settings
Serial number usage is defined at two places in SAP-PM under IMG activity as shown below
First stage: IMG-> Plant Maintenance & Customer Service - Master Data in PM & CS - Tech Objects – Serial number Management- Define Serial number profiles
Then go to the serializing procedure and see the serial number usage for 'MMSL'. It should be '03'.
Second stage: IMG-> Plant Maintenance & Customer Service - Master Data in PM & CS - Tech Objects – Serial number Management-> Define Serialization Attributes for Movement Types
Select the “define flow type groups”
Here also, the serial number usage should be '03'.
Let me know if you need any more help.
Regards
Vijay

Stock & serial number mismatch

Dear all,
           Please go through following:
Stock in MMBE   205
serial no in IQ09 206
Physically found 206
We are using production order .
Can you please guide me how to resolve this issue.
Regards,
Satya

satyasappp wrote:
Dear all,
>            Please go through following:
> Stock in MMBE   205
> serial no in IQ09 206
> Physically found 206
>
> We are using production order .
>
>
> Can you please guide me how to resolve this issue.
>
> Regards,
> Satya
Hi Satya,
If you are in productive system and has ensured that all the goods movement postings have been correct with respect to stock and serial numbers, you have to reassure the GR and GI and run a physical inventory to correct the mismatch.
Shiva

MM / FI stock balance mismatch

I observed MM / FI stock balance mismatch,
Pls advice in this regard.
Thanks in advance
Girish

Check
Re: How to match the stock value in FI and MM.
probable reason of difference in stock bal in fi and mm

Stock Posting and Journal Posting Mismatch

Hi experts,
I am facing a peculiar problem while creating inventory initial quantities.
Problem is as follows.
I have created a transaction for an item x in initial quantities
Item = x , Qty = 2 nos and Price = 10000
In Inventory audit report the system is showing 2x10000 = 20000
But in Journal Entry Created for the above Transaction is showing as follows
Account Name                         Dr        Cr
Stock Account                    60000
Inventory OB Account                       60000
The above is an example - I found the similar type transaction in the system about 15 transactions
and I have verified the value of inventory audit and the respective stock accounts - The difference is only from this 15 transactions.
We are using SAP Business one 8.8 PL12
and have checked for data inconsistency found no error
For your information we would have created about 1000 entries of initial quantity the error is only in this 15 transactions
Can any on help us in solving this issue ASAP
With Regards,
Karthik

Hi Karthik.........
Have you checked the General Ledger of Stock Account in Financials> Financial Reports> Financial> Accounting> General Ledger wihtin particular date range?.....
Regards,
Rahul

WM/IM Stock mismatch

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for