WM inventory clearance created under which movt type 711-718

Hi all,
My client requirement is to see the WM inventory clearance created under which movt type 711-718.
I have found the link in MSEG but to further segregate them i want (IM material document cliearance &
item number )
I have checked Bin Inv record but do not found,
can any body tell me how to see the inventry clearance material document(in which table)

Hi,
WM inventory counting movement types are 711 for decrease differences and 712 for Increase differences.
If you are facing problems in MSEG, try looking in transaction MB51 with the above movement types possibly with date ranges if you need.
Amit G

Similar Messages

Under which license type are InDesign Script provided ?

Hi guys,
At work we use ID CS3. It comes with a script called "CropMarks". It's a great script but it doesn't really fit ours needs. I modifyed it (add bleed management & doesn't draw marks inside the selection) to fit ours wishes.
Some other people may need a such script so I wanted to give it for free.
I don't know where I can put a script (I mean online) and most importantly, I don't know if I'm allowed to do this. This is not a script I wrote from scratch, I modifyed a script shipped with ID.
So are those scripts under GNU license or anything. Must I give my script under a certain license ?
Thank you for your help !

Hi Loic,
You can distribute the script. You just can't claim it as your own--you might say something like:
//Created by Adobe Systems, Inc., modified by Loic TEIXEIRA
The original script shouldn't draw marks inside the selection unless you select the Each Object option. Have you seen cases where it does that?
Thanks,
Ole
Thanks to Harbs for bringing this question to my attention!

For Inventory Adjustment : Which Idoc type to be used and why?

Hi Gurus,
For Goods Movement in one of the MM-Purch Implementation I used the Idoc type : MBGMCR03
at that time inventaory was not playing a big role.
But for now for doing inventory adjustment (Inventory has importance now) which Idoc type to be followed:
Can I use same Idoc type : MBGMCR03
Or Shd I go for Idoc type : WMMBID02
In some threads I read if MM you shd. go for MBGMCR03 and for IM : WMMBID02.
But why I dont know the answer...
Please give me your views on this.
Thanks
Amresh

MBGMCR03 is basically the BDBG idoc type and uses BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE to post the goods movement... You can check the documentation for the FM /BAPI to determine what kind of goods movement is possible. You can look at T158G table to find the t-codes supported. If you can post your inventory adjustment using the BAPI, you can use MBGMCR03, as long as middle ware can support that format...
As far as the WMMBID02, It uses the IDOC FM (which in turn also uses the MB_CREATE_GOODS_MOVEMENT)..

Goods Issue not possible with ref to Reservation using 201 mvt type when reservation created by 311 movement type

HI MM Folks,
My requirement is reservation should be created with 311 movt type. When we do good issue with 201 movt type with reference to reservation
system is throwing an error "Goods movement not possible with mvmt type 311". Due to MRP run we should create a reservation using 311 movement type but not 201 mvt type, (If we create a reservation 201 movt type, during MRP run automatically reservation quantity also taking into consideration, to avoid this we will be creating reservation as 311 movt type). Is there any enhancement to available to reach the requirement. If it is possible give me guidelines.
your help will be highly appreciable.
Regards
Vinay

Dear,
Movement type 311 is for doing transfer posting from storage location to storage location with single step.But Movement Type 201 is to have consumption entry with respect to cost center etc...
You are creating a reservation using 311 movement type and while posting the entry you are selecting the"Executable action in MIGO" is "A08-Transfer Posting" so system will always use the movement type used at the time of reservation only.Here you can not change.
And more over if you process entry with 201 movement type system creates accounting documents but with movement type 311 system will not create accounting documents.
Regards,
Pardhu

Movement Type 711

Gurus,
When an Inventory for an article is created with the Movement type 711. What exactly it mean?. What is the purpose of Movement Type 711? and When do we use it.

Hi,
When you make a physical inventory and you find that there is a waste of material which means physic quantity is < to quantity on the system so we :
1- adjust the quantity on the system
2- the variance of quantity is removed through mvt 711
example :
T0 : on the system there is 100 pcs of material A in the plant 0001
When count material A int this plant I find only 90 pcs so
T1 : Plant 0001 ---> 90 pcs of material A
 Storage type 999---> 10 pcs of material A
one the financial department apourve the waste of material
the quantity wasted is removed through mvt 711
T2 : Plant 0001---> 90 pcs of material A
the quantity on the system = real quantity
regards

Inventory load using 561 movt type and auto confirm TO in MB1C using 561 movt type

Hello All,
I am doing the inventory load using 561 movt type in MB1C. Then the material is in 998 storage type and bin "AUFNAHME". my requirement is that i want to confirm the TO, when i do the MB1C itself for the 561 movt type. Is there a way in the SAP, where i can trigger the TO confirmation in the background automatically, when i use 561 movt type in MB1C.
Right now my thought processing is that as below,
i create the inventory load using 561 movt type in MB1C and use the LT10 and move the stock to a different bin and confirm the TO.
In the above step, i am using LT10 as a extra step for confirming the TO, which i am trying to decreasing my configuring in such as way for the movt type 561, so that it will automatically confirm the TO in the background, while doing the MB1C.
My 2nd question is, when i have 5000 different materials, which are inventory loaded using 561 movt type and MB1C. I am trying to auto confirm the TO in the background, when doing the MB1C for 561 movt type itself.Secondly, if it doesn't work, then i can goto LL01 and pick the unconfirmed TOs and mass confirm the TO's.
On the whole, my questions are is there any std config in SAP to auto confirm the TO for movt type 561 in MB1C. If it is not possible, then i need the best way to mass confirm the TO's in SAP.
Thnks,
Kapil

Hello Kapil,
Let me explain the process step by step
Assumption/mandatory criteria- The process is applicable only in case you do not have storage unit management active This process is warehouse transfer w/o WM transaction. This method is based on principle of MB1A- 711/712 movement type.
(1) Use OMJJ and create new movement type by coping 561 for ex- "Z61". In field selection (flield selection from 201) double click on WM and make the entry "WM storage bin and storage type as required entry from suppress.
(2) Now use MB1C with above customised movement type. At the end of this transaction,system will take you to the screen to make an entry in storage type and storage bin. Post the entry.
That's it. Your stock would be in warehouse as well as IM stock would be in sync. There is no TR/TO. You can create LSMW to upload the data by this method. If you have SUT defined then you can follow the same process as above. But after that do not forget to update LQUA-LETYP field with respective SUT. However, you can not use this method in case you have SU management active.
My view with this upload process- Please use other data uploading method which are not at all time consuming. In more than 90% of most of the business scenarios, storage unit type is used. Hence you will have to perform additional activity of updating LQUA-LETYP-storage unit type field. If this is the case, then why cant you use other uploading method?.
Thanks,
Milind

New Document Type Created but not allowing posting under that Document type

Hi Gurus,
I have created new document type 'JV' & assigned number ranges to that document type. But when I started posting the entries under this document type, system has thrown one error 'NO ACCOUNTING TRANSACTION VARIANT ASSIGNED TO FB01/JV'
Now after assigning transaction 000 (unspecified posting) & varaint 0001 to document type JV I can able to post the entry under this document type. (Classify document type for document spitting)
But I am not still sure whether my assignment to this particular document type is correct or not?
What is the basic criteria on the basis of which we have to select this assignment to particular document type?
Thanks
Sonal

What you have defined is correct. Since you are defining the document type jv meant for any type of posting and not restriciting like payments/receipts/vendors/customers.

Can't create free PO with the material which material type is UNBW

When I create a free PO with the material which material type is UNBW , error happens as below:
Account assignment mandatory for material *** (enter acc. ***. cat.)
There is no provision for value-based inventory management for this material type in this plant. Account assignment is thus necessary.
But I use UNBW material type just because it's only QTY updating, and no value update.
So this PO should has no relationship to FI document and any GL account or cost center.
How can I create PO and GR for UNBW material in SAP system?
Please tell me the solution in detail, thanks!

Dear,
Same scenario i have done in SAP. when we create free P.O then condition tab is automatically remove from the item level.
But Cost Center and G/L account will compulsory. May be because of inventory. Inventory should affect the cost center and G/L account.
Regards,
Sandip

Which Idoc type for Quality release process and Inventory reconciliation/adj. with 3PL

Dear experts,
could you please provide your suggestion on which Idoc type to use for following two scenarios between Client and 3PL vendor (Logistic provider):
1st scenario:
- Products are released in QM in clients SAP. As a result of this action stock status is changed. This information should be sent to 3PL vendor. 3PL vendor receives the information, changes the inventory status in its system and sends confirmation back to the client. Is there any Idoc type that can be used?
2nd scenario:
- 3PL vendor sends stock reconciliation static report to the client. Client receives the report and compares it with own report. Exceptions are reviewed and adjusted upon agreement between Client and 3PL. Once 3PL adjusts the stock, this information is received in Client system and processed subsequently. Any suggestions for an Idoc with Stock reconciliation report and also for stock adjustments?
Many thanks for each idea to everyone in advance.

Hi Ramesh,
thank you for this idea. Unfortunately it seems not be applicable for our system as it is ECC 5.0 and INVRPT Idoc type I can only find in ECC 6.0.
Do you have any other idea or we have to build a new custom Idoc type?

How to create a new output type in inventory management

dear consultants .
how to create a new output type in inventory management...........?
please give me a solution
regards
ratan

Refer:
http://sap.ittoolbox.com/groups/technical-functional/sap-dev/attaching-smartform-to-the-standard-transaction-2316027

How to publish workflows created under content type to make it available in all my-sites.

Hi,
i followed this procedure to publish workflows in my-sites but even after activating workflow feature am unable to get created workflow templates in my-site.
Create a workflow and associate it with your content type in the hub.
Before publishing this content type, export the reusable workflow and import it in all the subscriber site collections or deploy your workflow to the farm if it is a farm solution
Activate your workflow feature
Now, your workflow is available in the hub as well as all the subscriber site collections.
Publish the content type. The workflow association will be publish.
can anyone help me out of this issue.

Hi,
As I understand, you encountered the issue after activating workflow feature.
Per my test, I can get the created workflow templates
after activating workflow feature by workflow 2010.
1. Check if you use SharePoint 2010 workflow because SharePoint 2013 workflow doesn’t work.
2. Reactive the workflow template feature in your site collection.
3. If it still doesn’t work, open the site collection you want to use the workflow in the SharePoint designer and associated the workflow with the content type in the site collection. After these steps, you can use workflow in your all site collection.
There is a similar thread:
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/office/en-US/714d1e48-a31d-4daa-9572-62d56c3b8c93/create-workflow-for-content-type-which-can-be-accessed-as-a-template-in-all-sites-including-mysite?forum=sharepointadmin
Best regards,
Sara Fan

Repair Raid which was created under Panther

Recently a RAID 1 on one of our servers degraded and one of the discs is now shown as "spare". I tried to use "diskutil repairMirror" as described in the Apple Knowledge Base, but the command says that this is a 1.x RAID (which is correct, since it was created under Panther) and has to be converted first.
After some googling it seems to me that it is not a good idea to do the "convertRAID" command on a live system. So what should I do now? I think I have two options:
1) Boot with an old Panther DVD and repair the mirror, then boot from a Tiger DVD and convert the RAID.
2) Boot from Tiger DVD, convert the RAID and then repair it.
What do you think is the better option? Or do you have better ones? I'd love to hear them!
Thanks,David

If you have the means to do option 1, I would suggest that one. Repairing any damage before the conversion makes the most sense. However, since the server will be down, you can look at this as an opportunity to simply start from scratch. If you have the means, you can capture your volume to a disk image. Then, destroy the old mirror and recreate a new one under Tiger. Once the new one is created (and you have no OS 9 drivers), then restore the disk image back to the new mirror. Obviously, if your disk is both boot and data, you may need a lot of space.
Good luck and hope it helps.

Inspection Lot not creating for 657 mvt type

Hello,
I am unable to create inspection lot for customer returns. Mvt type used by SD module for customer return is 657 ( to blocked stock). While sales to return order with this mvt type, no inspection lot is getting generated.
But when returns are done with 651 mvt type (Returns to QI), I am able to create inspection lots.
Can anyone tell me how to activate inspection for 657 mvt type as I want this stock to go directly to Blocked stock.
Thanks in advance.
Jason

Dear,
Quality inspection stock (movement type is 655)
Blocked stock (movement type 657)
If the given quantity is posted to blocked stock returns first, you can make a manual goods movement posting in the Inventory Management component to transfer the quantity to valuated stock.
Tcode vov6 - there will be schedule line category DN.
go to details of DN.In Business data,check which movement type is assigned here change it to 655 and try.
Also go to material master, select "Quality Management" view and execute. There click on "Insp.setup" and press "F5". Assign "06" under tbe tab "Inse.Type" and save.
Now if that material returns from any customer, the stock will be blocked for quallity clearance. Only quality people can give clearance for that material.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

New Effective CAL essay: How do I create an abstract data type in CAL?

How do I create an abstract data type in CAL? An abstract data type is one whose internal representation can be changed without needing to modify the source code of client modules that make use of that type. For software maintainability, it is a good idea to make a type that is subject to change or enhancement into an abstract data type. Another reason to create an abstract data type is to enforce invariants for values of the type that can only be ensured by using constructor functions (i.e. functions that return values of that type). In principle it is simple to create an abstract data type in CAL. For an algebraic data type, make the type constructor public and all data constructors private. For a foreign data type, make the type constructor public and the implementation scope private. If a scope qualifier is omitted, the scope is taken to be private. For example, the Map algebraic data type has the public type constructor Map and the data constructors Tip and Bin are each private, so it is an abstract data type. /** A map from keys (of type {@code k@}) to values (of type {@code a@}). */ data public Map k a = private Tip | private Bin size :: !Int key :: !k value :: a leftMap :: !(Map k a) rightMap :: !(Map k a); There are a number of invariants of this type: the size field represents the number of elements in the map represented by its Bin value. The keys in leftMap are all less than key, which in turn is less than all the keys in rightMap. In particular, non-empty Map values can only be created if the key parameter type is a member of the Ord type class. Values of the Map type can be created outside the Cal.Collections.Map module only by using constructor functions such as insert: insert :: Ord k => k -> a -> Map k a -> Map k a; public insert !key value !map = ... The owner of the Cal.Collections.Map module must ensure that all invariants of the Map type are satisfied, but if this is done, then it will automatically hold for clients using this function. Some examples of foreign abstract data types are Color, StringNoCase and RelativeDate: data foreign unsafe import jvm private "java.awt.Color" public Color; data foreign unsafe import jvm private "java.lang.String" public StringNoCase; data foreign unsafe import jvm private "int" public RelativeDate; The private implementation scope for Color means that a foreign function whose type involves Color can only be declared in the Cal.Graphics.Color module where the Color type is defined. A foreign function declaration involving the Color type relies on the compiler knowing that the Color type corresponds to java.awt.Color to resolve the corresponding Java entity i.e. it must know about the implementation of the Color type. Having a private implementation scope means that the Color type can be changed to correspond to a different Java class, or indeed to be an algebraic type, without the risk of breaking client code. In all these three cases there are useful, and different, design reasons to adopt a private implementation scope: For RelativeDate, the Java implementation type int represents a coded Gregorian date value in the date scheme used by Crystal Reports. Not all int values correspond to valid dates, and the algorithm to map an int to a year/month/day equivalent is fairly complicated, taking into account things like Gregorian calendar reform. Thus, it is desirable to hide the implementation of this type. For StringNoCase, the implementation is more straightforward as a java.lang.String. The reason to adopt a private implementation scope is to ensure that all functions involving StringNoCase preserve the semantics of StringNoCase as representing a case-insensitive string value. Otherwise it is very easy for clients to declare a function such as: foreign unsafe import jvm "method replace" replaceChar :: StringNoCase -> Char -> Char -> StringNoCase; which does not handle case-insensitivity correctly, but is a perfectly valid declaration. This declaration results in a compilation error when it is placed outside the module in which StringNoCase is defined because of the private implementation scope of StringNoCase. For Color, the issue is somewhat more subtle. The java.awt.Color implementation type is semantically the same as the CAL Color type. The problem is that java.awt.Color is mutable (since it can be sub-classed to create a mutable type). It is preferable for a first-class CAL type to not be mutable, so we simply make the implementation scope private to ensure that this will be the case. A somewhat less encapsulated kind of abstract data type can be created using friend modules and protected scope. For example, if an algebraic type is public, and all its data constructors are protected, then the data constructors can be accessed in the friend modules of the module in which the type is defined. Effectively this means that the implementation of the semantics of the type stretches over the module in which the type is defined, and all of its friend modules. These must all be checked if the implementation of the type is modified. Given the merits of abstract data types discussed above, it is perhaps surprising that most of the core types defined in the Prelude module are not abstract data types. For example: Boolean, Char, Int, Double, String, List, Maybe, Either, Ordering, JObject, JList, and all record and tuple types are non-abstract types. There are different reasons for this, depending on the particular type involved. For example, Boolean, List, Maybe, Either and Ordering are all rather canonical algebraic data types with a long history in functional languages, with many standard functions using them. They are thus guaranteed never to change. In addition, their values have no particular design invariants that need to be enforced via constructor functions. Exposing the data constructors gives clients some additional syntactic flexibility in using values of the type. For example, they can pattern match on the values using case expressions or let patterns. Essentially the same explanation holds for record and tuple types. Although non-tuple record types are less canonical, they do correspond to the fundamental notion of an anonymous named-field product type. The "anonymous" here simply means that the programmer can create an entirely new record type simply by creating a value; the type does not have to be declared anywhere prior to use. Char, Int, Double, String, JObject and JList are foreign types where in fact part of the semantics of the type is that we want clients to know that the type is a foreign type. For example, we want clients to know that Prelude.Int is essentially the Java primitive unboxed int type, and has all the semantics you would expect of the Java int type i.e. this is quite different from RelativeDate which is using int as its implementation type in a very tactical way that we may choose to change. One can think of a public foreign type declaration with public implementation scope as simply introducing the Java type into the CAL namespace. One interesting point here is with CAL's naming convention for public foreign types. We prefix a type name by "J" (for "Java") for foreign types with public implementation type such that the underlying Java type is mutable. This is intended as mnemonic that the type is not a pure functional type and thus some caution needs to be taken when using it. For example, Prelude.JObject has public Java implementation type java.lang.Object. In the case where the underlying Java type is not mutable, we do not use the prefix, since even though the type is foreign; it is basically a first class functional type and can be freely used without concern. For example, Prelude.String has public Java implementation type java.lang.String. In the case where the implementation type is private, then the fact that the type is a foreign type, whether mutable or not, is an implementation detail and we do not hint at that detail via the name. Thus Color.Color has as its private Java implementation type the mutable Java type java.awt.Color. When creating abstract data types it is important to not inadvertently supply public API functions that conflict with the desired public semantics of the type. For example, if the type is publicly a pure-functional (i.e. immutable) type such as Color, it is important not to expose functions that mutate the internal Java representation. A more subtle case of inadvertently exposing the implementation of a type can occur with derived instances. For example, deriving the Prelude.Outputable and Prelude.Inputable type classes on a foreign type, whose implementation type is a mutable Java reference type, allows the client to gain access to the underlying Java value and mutate it
(by calling Prelude.output, mutating, and then calling Prelude.input). The solution in this case is to not derive Inputable and Outputable instances, but rather to define a custom Inputable and Outputable instance that copies the underlying values.

Hi Pandra801,
When you create a the external content type, please try to add a filter based on your select statement.
http://arsalkhatri.wordpress.com/2012/01/07/external-list-with-bcs-search-filters-finders/
Or, try to create a stored procedure based on your select statement, then create ECT using the SQL stored procedure.
A step by step guide in designing BCS entities by using a SQL stored procedure
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sharepointdev/archive/2011/02/10/173-a-step-by-step-guide-in-designing-bcs-entities-by-using-a-sql-stored-procedure.aspx
I hope this helps.
Thanks,
Wendy
Wendy Li
TechNet Community Support

Account assignment for Movt type 101 and 501

All SAP Gurus,
We want to do the account assignment for movt types 101, 102, 122, 123, 201, 202, 261, 262 accourding to the movement types.
We are aware that the Transaction Key is 'GBB'.
But how to know that which 'General Modification' is used for which movement types.
(in short where we can find this link between movement types and Transaction Key and 'General Modification')
Regards,

To know this first you have to know what does the different general modifications means for GBB:
AUA: for order settlement
AUF: for goods receipts for orders (without account assignment)
and for order settlement if AUA is not maintained
AUI: Subsequent adjustment of actual price from cost center directly
to material (with account assignment)
BSA: for initial entry of stock balances
INV: for expenditure/income from inventory differences
VAX: for goods issues for sales orders without
account assignment object (the account is not a cost element)
VAY: for goods issues for sales orders with
account assignment object (account is a cost element)
VBO: for consumption from stock of material provided to vendor
VBR: for internal goods issues (for example, for cost center)
VKA: for sales order account assignment
(for example, for individual purchase order)
VKP: for project account assignment (for example, for individual PO)
VNG: for scrapping/destruction
VQP: for sample withdrawals without account assignment
VQY: for sample withdrawals with account assignment
ZOB: for goods receipts without purchase orders (mvt type 501)
ZOF: for goods receipts without production orders
(mvt types 521 and 531)
You can also define your own account groupings. If you intend to post goods issues for cost centers (mvt type 201) and goods issues for orders (mvt type 261) to separate consumption accounts, you can assign the account grouping ZZZ to movement type 201 and account grouping YYY to movement type 261
Then go and check OMWN.
Regards,
Indranil

WM inventory clearance created under which movt type 711-718

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for