WM-PP interface - One TO / Mutiple TO

Dear PP Gurus,
I am working on WW-PP interface,
I would like to check if there is any configuration settings that i need to do so that the system will create seprate transfer requirements / orders for each BOM component when i release the production order.
Currently system is creating one transfer requirement for all BOM components (mutiple line items).
Thanks
Regards
Seshu

Hi Amarendra Seshu,
Can you explain why u need this requirement?
In general the creation of transfer requirement settings is done in production scheduling profile.
The various options are:
No creation of transfer requirements on order release
X Only creation of transfer requirements on release
1 Transfer requirement and transfer order on release
Therefore normally TR gets generated for all the items in the order at the time of release. After release if u add any line item in the order then separate TR gets generated for that particular item.
If you want to restrict that if TR is not generated for any one of the item then u can restrict TR generation for all other items too by checking the tick box (Complete Transfer Requirement) in production scheduling profile.
Hope above throws some light on your issue.
Please correct me if i am wrong.
Regards
Suri

Similar Messages

Two external interfaces; one to be used for outboud; second to be used for incoming VPN\Web traffic.

I'm configuring our ASA and we have two AT&T circuits which we're only using one with our current Juniper firewall. I know the ASA doesn't support policy based routing so I'm wondering if the following hypothetical "config" is possible.
External Interfaces:
OUT_01 - 12.133.X.X
OUT_02 - 201.61.X.X
I would route all internal traffic to go out through OUT_01.
We have over 5 site-to-site VPN and 30 external facing servers. Could I use OUT_2 to configure all the inbound connections for the VPN and NAT rules?

You can configure the ASA to allow asynchronous routing, as you are describing, by configuring TCP bypass.
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/asa/asa82/configuration/guide/config/conns_tcpstatebypass.html
What this will do is you will still need to send traffic out one interface but the ASA will accept return traffic on either of the outside interfaces. Configuring this can be a security risk as the ASA will ignor the state table.
Or you could wait until ASA version 9.4 which will have support for PBR. Ofcourse this is the first version that will support it, so don't be suprised if it has a few bugs.
Please remember to select a correct answer and rate helpful posts

Set up IPMP Solaris 10 -- two interfaces, one IP

I have a tasking to set up failure-based IPMP on a T5120. I have been reading all the Sun documentation on setting up IPMP, but cannot find exactly what I am looking for. I have one IP address, and two connected NICs, and my task is to set up IPMP so that if e1000g0 fails, e1000g1 will take over. Is this possible, and if so, how?

If you have two interfaces and only want link-based failure detection, just put the group $YOUR_GROUPNAME statement in /etc/hostname.$INTERFACE file.
Say you have the two interfaces e1000g0 and e1000g1, your hostname is MyHostname and your group is MyGroup you would do the following:
put
MyHostname group MyGroup in /etc/hostname.e1000g0.
Put group MyGroup in /etc/hostname.e1000g1.
Either reboot the machine or manually configure ipmp:
ifconfig e1000g0 group MyGroup
ifconfig e1000g1 plumb group MyGroup up
in /var/adm/messages you there should be an info that no test-adress was given and that ipmp will operate in link-failure detection mode only.
Please note that officially you should create an ipmp instance first by issuing something like ifconfig $MyIPMP-Instance group MyGroup, but that step could be left out as ipmp instances are created implicitly.

ODI Interface - One to many Transactional table to Flat Table

Hi,
In my transactional system I have two tables Program and Program Details, Program and Program Details is one to many relationship. I need to create a target table with few columns from Programs and all columns from Program Details as a flat target table, please let me know how to design the interface. Thanks for your time and help.

HI,
create a data store with required columns
and specify the file format as filename.txt at resource name(available at definition tab in data model) then your target will be created at yout logical schema path.
Thanks,
Swaroopa
Edited by: 989684 on Mar 7, 2013 9:03 PM

EHP4 flexible appraisal - How to use one coloum mutiple times

Dear PMS gurus,
I have a requirement as follows
Is there a possibility to use a column many times in a criterion group or criteria. Like,
There are five objectives created in a criterion group and all the fine objectives have to evaluated as
1. Target to be achieved
2. Actual target achieved
For every target we need to have these columns. Is there a possibility we can do that in the standard.
Also is there a possibility we can have the coloums in horizontal manner instead of the current vertical way the standard gives
Thanks
Balaji

Hi Balaji
Yes in a flexible appraisal template you can use a column more than once in a criterion group or criterion.
With regards to layout of Columns , no you cannot have it vertical instead of horizontal (unless you enhance the webdynpro) . If you wish to have it vertical , you can change the layout in the offline download of form which means the users will always have to work in the offline download mode and upload the appraisal doc. Also you need to check if the ADOBE user licenses allows you to change the offline ADOBE form as it needs ADOBE designer .
Hope this helps
Regards
Urmila Pereira

Multiple Public IP's on one physical interface for devices behind Router.

Hi guys, I am trying to find information on applying multiple IP addresses to a router
basically one for the Router itself and then some for the devices behind the router, Which i am sure I need to apply some 1 to 1 NATs. I just do not know if i need to specify all the IP addresses on the main interface.
Example being I have a router with WAN ip of xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/25 , it only has 2 interface one for WAN one for LAN, i have a server I would like assigned its own public IP address. but still on the same LAN network.
Could someone help me out and point me in the right direction with a sample config

I agree with the previous response that you need a static NAT to allow outside resources to initiate traffic to your server. You also will need NAT or PAT using the router interface address to allow the other hosts in your network to access outside.
You do not need to configure any other of the addresses on the router interface other than the primary IP that you assign to the router interface. As long as the other addresses are used for NAT/PAT they are configured in the nat statements and not on the physical interface.
HTH
Rick

BPM with 2 JDBC outbound interfaces and one inbound file interface

Hi,
I have a scenario where data is coming from different databases into XI and after processing the data it creates a file at the target side. Some calculations are to be done in the middleware and the result will be sent through a file.
My question is
1. BPM will be used in this scenario?
2. There will 2 outbound interfaces(one for each database access), 2 abstract interfaces and one inbound interface(file). Please correct me if I am wrong.
3. I have to multiply the value of field from one database to a particular value in another database and get the final result. For e.g exchange rate from one database is multiplied to Transaction currency in another database and get the group currency value in the output. Can anyone give the sequence of steps in the intergration process for this scenario as I am new to BPM.
Thanks,
Aparna

Thanks a lot Liang and madhusudana for your responses.
Since I can use JDBC lookup for this in my nornal scenario I think no need for BPM.
I have created the advanced UDF for JDBC lookup code. Below is the code.
String Query = " ";
Channel channel = null;
DataBaseAccessor accessor = null;
DataBaseResult resultSet = null;
MappingTrace importanttrace;
importanttrace = container.getTrace();
// Build the Query String
Query = "Select home_cur_code FROM gltrxcp WHERE company_code = '" + a[0] + "' ";
try{
//Determine a channel, as created in the Configuration
channel = LookupService.getChannel("BS_JDBC_send","cc_JDBClookup_rec");
//Get a system accessor for the channel. As the call is being made to an DB, an DatabaseAccessor is obtained.
accessor = LookupService.getDataBaseAccessor(channel);
//Execute Query and get the values in resultset
resultSet = accessor.execute(Query);
importanttrace.addWarning("resultset" + resultSet );
for(Iterator rows = resultSet.getRows();rows.hasNext();){
Map rowMap = (Map)rows.next();
result.addValue((String)rowMap.get("HOME_CUR_CODE"));
importanttrace.addWarning("result" + result );
catch(Exception ex){
result.addValue(ex.getMessage());
finally{
try{
if (accessor!=null) accessor.close();
catch(Exception e){
result.addValue(e.getMessage());
But I am not getting the desired result. I am getting result as 'Null'.
Can you please help in resolving this issue. I have also used trace for find out where it is passing Null and found that 'result' is coming null. Do i also need to parse it before passing it to 'result'?
Can anyone send sample code for JDBC lookup.

Launching multiple interface at one time

Can we launch multiple interface at one go? I have scenario .In that scenario I have created a package and defined the multiple stages. After the completion of one stage next step will be launched. In one step I have to populate 5 tables for different kind of validation and transformation and after successful validation I have to do next processing. For this I have to create 5 different interfaces. But I don’t want to run these 5 interface one by one .I want to do it in parallel. Can I achieve this?
Regards,
Vineet

Hi,
I couldn't see this option at diagram. Could you, please, give more details about how to put "multiples" next steps? I could use just one. (what ODI version are you?)
In the way that I know, you need to generate scenarios of the 5 interfaces and "drag and drop" it at a package and create the flow (green line) between them.
At each interface scenario, go to options tab, "Synchronous/Asynchronous" option and choose Asynchronous.
This will start the interfaces at parallel.

Getting "IPSEC(epa_des_crypt): decrypted packet failed SA identity check" messages on packets from only one of two far-end sources sharing the same tunnel, the other source works fine. What exactly does this error mean?

One computer at COMPANY-A is attempting to communicate with two
computers located at COMPANY-B, via an IPsec tunnel between the
two companies.
All communications are via TCP protocol.
All devices present public IP addresses to one another, although they
may have RFC 1918 addresses on other interfaces, and NAT may be in use
on the COMPANY-B side. (NAT is not being used on the COMPANY-A side.)
The players:(Note: first three octets have been changed for security reasons)
COMPANY-A computer      1.2.3.161
COMPANY-A router        1.2.3.8 (also IPsec peer)
COMPANY-A has 1.2.3.0/24 with no subnetting.
COMPANY-B router        4.5.6.228 (also IPsec peer)
COMPANY-B computer #1   4.5.7.94 (this one has no issues)
COMPANY-B computer #2   4.5.7.29 (this one fails)
COMPANY-B has 4.5.6.0/23 subnetted in various ways.
COMPANY-B also has 9.10.11.0/24, but it is not involved in the issue.
What works:
The COMPANY-A computer 1.2.3.161 can communicate via the single IPsec
tunnel to COMPANY-B computer #1 4.5.7.94 without problems.
The "show crypto session detail" command shows Inbound/Outbound packets
flowing in the dec'ed and enc'ed positions.
What doesn't:
When the COMPANY-A computer 1.2.3.161 attempts to communicate
via the single IPsec tunnel with the COMPANY-B computer #2 4.5.7.29,
the COMPANY-A router eventually reports five of these messages:
Oct 9 15:24:54.327: IPSEC(epa_des_crypt): decrypted packet failed SA identity check
Oct 9 15:24:57.327: IPSEC(epa_des_crypt): decrypted packet failed SA identity check
Oct 9 15:25:03.327: IPSEC(epa_des_crypt): decrypted packet failed SA identity check
Oct 9 15:25:15.328: IPSEC(epa_des_crypt): decrypted packet failed SA identity check
Oct 9 15:25:39.329: IPSEC(epa_des_crypt): decrypted packet failed SA identity check
Oct 9 15:26:27.328: IPSEC(epa_des_crypt): decrypted packet failed SA identity check
and the "show crypto session detail" shows inbound packets being dropped.
The COMPANY-A computer that opens the TCP connection never gets past the
SYN_SENT phase of the TCP connection whan trying to communicate with the
COMPANY-B computer #2, and the repeated error messages are the retries of
the SYN packet.
On the COMPANY-A side, this IPsec configuration has been set up on a 3745,
a 3725, and some 76xx routers were tried, all with similar behavior,
with packets from one far-end computer passing fine, and packets from
another far-end computer in the same netblock passing through the same
IPsec tunnel failing with the "failed SA identity" error.
The COMPANY-A computer directs all packets headed to COMPANY-B via the
COMPANY-A router at 1.2.3.8 with this set of route settings:
netstat -r -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags   MSS Window irtt Iface
4.5.7.0         1.2.3.8         255.255.255.0   UG        0 0          0 eth3
1.2.3.8.0       0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U         0 0          0 eth3
10.1.0.0        0.0.0.0         255.255.240.0   U         0 0          0 eth0
169.254.0.0     0.0.0.0         255.255.0.0     U         0 0          0 eth3
10.0.0.0        10.1.1.1        255.0.0.0       UG        0 0          0 eth0
0.0.0.0         1.2.3.1         0.0.0.0         UG        0 0          0 eth3
The first route line shown is selected for access to both COMPANY-B computers.
The COMPANY-A router (IPsec tunnel endpoint, 1.2.3.8) has this
configuration:
crypto isakmp policy 10
encr 3des
authentication pre-share
group 2
lifetime 28800
crypto isakmp key XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX address 4.5.6.228
crypto ipsec security-association lifetime seconds 86400
crypto ipsec transform-set COMPANY-B01 esp-3des esp-sha-hmac
crypto map COMPANY-BMAP1 10 ipsec-isakmp
description COMPANY-B VPN
set peer 4.5.6.228
set transform-set COMPANY-B01
set pfs group2
match address 190
interface FastEthernet0/0
ip address 1.2.3.8 255.255.255.0
no ip redirects
ip virtual-reassembly
duplex auto
speed auto
no cdp enable
crypto map COMPANY-BMAP1
ip forward-protocol nd
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 1.2.3.1
ip route 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 10.1.1.1
ip route 1.2.3.8.0 255.255.255.0 FastEthernet0/0
access-list 190 permit ip host 1.2.3.161 4.5.7.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 190 permit ip host 1.2.3.161 9.10.11.0 0.0.0.255
bridge 1 protocol ieee
One of the routers tried had this IOS/hardware configuration:
Cisco IOS Software, 3700 Software (C3725-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.4(25c),
RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
isco 3725 (R7000) processor (revision 0.1) with 115712K/15360K bytes of memory.
Processor board ID XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
R7000 CPU at 240MHz, Implementation 39, Rev 3.3, 256KB L2 Cache
2 FastEthernet interfaces
4 ATM interfaces
DRAM configuration is 64 bits wide with parity disabled.
55K bytes of NVRAM.
31296K bytes of ATA System CompactFlash (Read/Write)
250368K bytes of ATA Slot0 CompactFlash (Read/Write)
Configuration register is 0x2102
#show crypto sess
Crypto session current status
Interface: FastEthernet0/0
Session status: UP-ACTIVE
Peer: 4.5.6.228 port 500
IKE SA: local 1.2.3.8/500 remote 4.5.6.228/500 Active
IPSEC FLOW: permit ip host 1.2.3.161 4.5.7.0/255.255.255.0
        Active SAs: 2, origin: crypto map
IPSEC FLOW: permit ip host 1.2.3.161 9.10.11.0/255.255.255.0
        Active SAs: 0, origin: crypto map
#show crypto sess det
Crypto session current status
Code: C - IKE Configuration mode, D - Dead Peer Detection
K - Keepalives, N - NAT-traversal, X - IKE Extended Authentication
Interface: FastEthernet0/0
Session status: UP-ACTIVE
Peer: 4.5.6.228 port 500 fvrf: (none) ivrf: (none)
      Phase1_id: 4.5.6.228
      Desc: (none)
IKE SA: local 1.2.3.8/500 remote 4.5.6.228/500 Active
          Capabilities:(none) connid:1 lifetime:06:26:27
IPSEC FLOW: permit ip host 1.2.3.161 4.5.7.0/255.255.255.0
        Active SAs: 2, origin: crypto map
        Inbound: #pkts dec'ed 651 drop 16 life (KB/Sec) 4496182/23178
        Outbound: #pkts enc'ed 574 drop 2 life (KB/Sec) 4496279/23178
IPSEC FLOW: permit ip host 1.2.3.161 9.10.11.0/255.255.255.0
        Active SAs: 0, origin: crypto map
        Inbound: #pkts dec'ed 0 drop 0 life (KB/Sec) 0/0
        Outbound: #pkts enc'ed 0 drop 0 life (KB/Sec) 0/0
The COMPANY-B device on their end of the IPsec VPN is a Juniper SSG1000
Version 6.1 (ScreenOS)
We only have a limited view into the Juniper device configuration.
What we were allowed to see was:
COMPANY-B-ROUTER(M)-> sh config | incl COMPANY-A
set address "Untrust" "oss-COMPANY-A-1.2.3.161" 1.2.3.161 255.255.255.255
set ike gateway "COMPANY-A-1-GW" address 1.2.3.8 Main outgoing-interface "ethernet2/1" preshare xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx proposal "pre-g2-3des-sha"
set vpn "COMPANY-A-1-IKE" gateway "COMPANY-A-1-GW" no-replay tunnel idletime 0 proposal "g2-esp-3des-sha-28800"
set policy id 2539 from "Untrust" to "Trust" "oss-COMPANY-A-1.2.3.161" "9.10.11.0-24" "ANY" tunnel vpn "COMPANY-A-1-IKE" id 0x309a pair-policy 2500
set policy id 2500 from "Trust" to "Untrust" "9.10.11.0-24" "oss-COMPANY-A-1.2.3.161" "ANY" tunnel vpn "COMPANY-A-1-IKE" id 0x309a pair-policy 2539
set policy id 2541 from "Trust" to "Untrust" "4.5.7.0-24" "oss-COMPANY-A-1.2.3.161" "ANY" tunnel vpn "COMPANY-A-1-IKE" id 0x309b pair-policy 2540
set policy id 2540 from "Untrust" to "Trust" "oss-COMPANY-A-1.2.3.161" "4.5.7.0-24" "ANY" tunnel vpn "COMPANY-A-1-IKE" id 0x309b pair-policy 2541
COMPANY-B-ROUTER(M)->
I suspect that this curious issue is due to a configuration setting on the
Juniper device, but neither party has seen this error before. COMPANY-B
operates thousands of IPsec VPNs and they report that this is a new error
for them too. The behavior that allows traffic from one IP address to
work and traffic from another to end up getting this error is also unique.
As only the Cisco side emits any error message at all, this is the only
clue we have as to what is going on, even if this isn't actually an IOS
problem.
What we are looking for is a description of exactly what the Cisco
IOS error message:
IPSEC(epa_des_crypt): decrypted packet failed SA identity check
is complaining about, and if there are any known causes of the behavior
described that occur when running IPsec between Cisco IOS and a Juniper
SSG device. Google reports many other incidents of the same error
message (but not the "I like that IP address but hate this one" behavior),
and not just with a Juniper device on the COMPANY-B end, but for those cases,
not one was found where the solution was described.
It is hoped that with a better explanation of the error message
and any known issues with Juniper configuration settings causing
this error, we can have COMPANY-B make adjustments to their device.
Or, if there is a setting change needed on the COMPANY-A router,
that can also be implemented.
Thanks in advance for your time in reading this, and any ideas.

Hello Harish,
It is believed that:
COMPANY-B computer #1   4.5.7.94 (this one has no issues)
COMPANY-B computer #2   4.5.7.29 (this one fails)
both have at least two network interfaces, one with a public IP address
(which we are supposedly conversing with) and one with a RFC 1918 type
address.   COMPANY-B is reluctant to disclose details of their network or
servers setup, so this is not 100% certain.
Because of that uncertainty, it occurred to me that perhaps COMPANY-B
computer #2 might be incorrectly routing via the RFC 1918 interface.
In theory, such packets should have been blocked by the access-list on both
COMPANY-A router, and should not have even made it into the IPsec VPN
if the Juniper access settings work as it appears they should. So I turned up
debugging on COMPANY-A router so that I could see the encrypted and
decrypted packet hex dumps.
I then hand-disassembled the decoded ACK packet IP header received just
prior to the "decrypted packet failed SA check" error being emitted and
found the expected source and destination IP addresses (4.5.7.29 and 1.2.3.161),
in the unecapsulated packet. I also found the expected port numbers of the TCP
conversation that was trying to be established in the TCP header. So, it
looks like COMPANY-B computer #2 is emitting the packets out the right
interface.
The IP packet header of the encrypted packet showed the IP addresses of the
two routers at each terminus of the IPsec VPN, but since I don't know what triggers
the "SA check" error message or what it is complaining about, I don't know what
other clues to look for in the packet dumps.
As to your second question, "can you check whether both encapsulation and
decapsulation happening in 'show crypto ipsec sa'",   the enc'ed/dec'ed
counters were both going up by the correct quantities. When communicating
with the uncooperative COMPANY-B computer #2, you would also see the
received Drop increment for each packet decrypted. When communicating
with the working COMPANY-B computer #1, the Drop counters would not
increment, and the enc'ed/dec'ed would both increment.
#show crypto sess det
Crypto session current status
Code: C - IKE Configuration mode, D - Dead Peer Detection
K - Keepalives, N - NAT-traversal, X - IKE Extended Authentication
Interface: FastEthernet0/0
Session status: UP-ACTIVE
Peer: 4.5.6.228 port 500 fvrf: (none) ivrf: (none)
      Phase1_id: 4.5.6.228
      Desc: (none)
IKE SA: local 1.2.3.8/500 remote 4.5.6.228/500 Active
          Capabilities:(none) connid:1 lifetime:07:59:54
IPSEC FLOW: permit ip host 1.2.3.161 4.5.7.0/255.255.255.0
        Active SAs: 2, origin: crypto map
        Inbound: #pkts dec'ed 376 drop 5 life (KB/Sec) 4458308/28784
        Outbound: #pkts enc'ed 401 drop 3 life (KB/Sec) 4458308/28784
Attempt a TCP communication to COMPANY-B computer #2...
show crypto sess det
Crypto session current status
Code: C - IKE Configuration mode, D - Dead Peer Detection
K - Keepalives, N - NAT-traversal, X - IKE Extended Authentication
Interface: FastEthernet0/0
Session status: UP-ACTIVE
Peer: 4.5.6.228 port 500 fvrf: (none) ivrf: (none)
      Phase1_id: 4.5.6.228
      Desc: (none)
IKE SA: local 1.2.3.8/500 remote 4.5.6.228/500 Active
          Capabilities:(none) connid:1 lifetime:07:59:23
IPSEC FLOW: permit ip host 1.2.3.161 4.5.7.0/255.255.255.0
        Active SAs: 2, origin: crypto map
        Inbound: #pkts dec'ed 376 drop 6 life (KB/Sec) 4458307/28753
        Outbound: #pkts enc'ed 402 drop 3 life (KB/Sec) 4458307/28753
Note Inbound "drop" changed from 5 to 6. (I didn't let it sit for all
the retries.)
#show crypto ipsec sa
interface: FastEthernet0/0
    Crypto map tag: COMPANY-BMAP1, local addr 1.2.3.8
   protected vrf: (none)
   local ident (addr/mask/prot/port): (1.2.3.161/255.255.255.255/0/0)
   remote ident (addr/mask/prot/port): (4.5.7.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
   current_peer 4.5.6.228 port 500
     PERMIT, flags={origin_is_acl,}
    #pkts encaps: 402, #pkts encrypt: 402, #pkts digest: 402
    #pkts decaps: 376, #pkts decrypt: 376, #pkts verify: 376
    #pkts compressed: 0, #pkts decompressed: 0
    #pkts not compressed: 0, #pkts compr. failed: 0
    #pkts not decompressed: 0, #pkts decompress failed: 0
    #send errors 3, #recv errors 6
     local crypto endpt.: 1.2.3.8, remote crypto endpt.: 4.5.6.228
     path mtu 1500, ip mtu 1500, ip mtu idb FastEthernet0/0
     current outbound spi: 0xDF2CC59C(3744253340)
inbound esp sas:
      spi: 0xD9D2EBBB(3654478779)
        transform: esp-3des esp-sha-hmac ,
        in use settings ={Tunnel, }
        conn id: 2004, flow_id: SW:4, crypto map: COMPANY-BMAP1
        sa timing: remaining key lifetime (k/sec): (4458307/28600)
        IV size: 8 bytes
        replay detection support: Y
        Status: ACTIVE
     inbound ah sas:
     inbound pcp sas:
     outbound esp sas:
      spi: 0xDF2CC59C(3744253340)
        transform: esp-3des esp-sha-hmac ,
        in use settings ={Tunnel, }
        conn id: 2003, flow_id: SW:3, crypto map: COMPANY-BMAP1
        sa timing: remaining key lifetime (k/sec): (4458307/28600)
        IV size: 8 bytes
        replay detection support: Y
        Status: ACTIVE
     outbound ah sas:
     outbound pcp sas:
The "send" errors appear to be related to the tunnel reverting to a
DOWN state after periods of inactivity, and you appear to get one
each time the tunnel has to be re-negotiated and returned to
an ACTIVE state. There is no relationship between Send errors
incrementing and working/non-working TCP conversations to the
two COMPANY-B servers.
Thanks for pondering this very odd behavior.

One sender and two receiver

Hi All,
I have a scenario in which there is only one outbound Message interface and 2 inbound message interfaces ( one sender and two receiver). In XI, how can i configure the interface determination for this? Shall i need to put * for receiver and add 2 inbound message interfaces and interface mappings.
Thanks
Michael

Use xpath in your interface determination in case you have some conditions, else u can *** multiple interfaces in your int. det.. also ref:
/people/suraj.sr/blog/2006/01/05/multiple-inbound-interfaces-within-a-service

CISCO ASR901 BRIDGE BETWEEN 2 INTERFACES WITH XCONNECT

Hi All!
I'm looking for some way to make a transparent bridge between two interfaces of a Cisco router ASR901 , is there any possibility? I ask this because I have a scenario where I would use the ASR901 to the following question :
POP01 (                            ) ASR901 g0 / 6 -------- > ISG_7206
POP02 ( MPLS CLOUD )                   g0 / 7 -------- > ISG_7206
POP03 (                            )
The ASR901 will focus EoMPLS with other points in the network and pass on to ISG routers , ie , VLANs would have to be two ports with XConnect to a remote router , the configuration would be something like this :
interface GigabitEthernet0/6
Core description : MPLS CONC PPPOE02
no ip address
negotiation auto
hold- queue 1024 in
hold- queue 1024 in October
service instance 4095 ethernet
encapsulation dot1q 4094
rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
interface GigabitEthernet0/7
Core description : 7206_PPPOE_01
no ip address
negotiation auto
service instance 4095 ethernet
encapsulation dot1q 4094
rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
end
L2VPN XConnect context TEST
ethernet interworking
member 201.55.127.202 1212 encapsulation mpls group TEST
member GigabitEthernet0 / 7 service -instance TEST 4095 group priority 1
member GigabitEthernet0 / 6 service -instance 4095
redundancy group delay 1 3 TEST
But without an interface that was redundant of other , what I need is the 2 interfaces in " bridge " making a XConnect to a remote router , and these 2 interfaces connected ISGs in 2 to make a balance .

Hello,
I do not believe that the ASR901 will do this without help from an upstream device. If I understand correctly, you want to build a bridge-domain with 3 EFPs: 2 physical ports, and one pseudowire. As of the last IOS revision that I have configured on this platform, the 901 doesn't support the pseudowire on a bridge-domain, only a service instance.
It seems to me that you would need an upstream box involved to support this.
Either:
Build 2 pseudowires to an upstream box that supports this configuration (like an ME 3600x, ME3800x, or 9k).
or
Associate both service instances to a common bridge domain that is extended to an upstream box that is initiating the pseudowire. More platforms would support this, since it does not require supporting the pseudowire on a bridge domain.
...Unless you are looking to build an LACP channel-group on the interfaces connected to the ISGs to load-balance. The 901 supports LACP, and it also supports building an EFP (service instance) on the channel-group interface. This technically makes the 2 physical interfaces one EFP. The part of this that I have not tried is building a pseudowire on an EFP on a channel-group.
Hope this helps.
Jason

Help : How to test interface mapping in n:1 scenario

I have a scenario two message interfaces==> one message interface.
Then I new one interface mapping, and choose two source interfaces, one target interface. Also filled the mapping program.
But when switch to the test tab, there is no display about the source and target message.
How to do the test in this kind of scenario?
Thanks a lot!
Edited by: kiki qin on Oct 28, 2008 2:24 PM

Hi
First check in Message mapping first if you have one.
Secondly when you select source or target message while developing message mapping did u get message like No objects found or something.
It should show either error or source message when you test interface mapping in any case.
Thanks
Gaurav

Special G/L indicator in SD/FI Interfaces

Hi, good morning for everybody.
I have the next question: I want to know if it is possible to make posting to a G/L account with a Special G/L indicator, from the interface SD/FI.
for example, i create a bill doc with VF01 tcode, and i want to post (with the SD/FI interface), one ITEM to the customer account (this posting will go to the recon. account), but the next item i wont to go to the customer account, but with a special G/L indicator.
Thanks a Lot for out help!!

Hi Manuel,
Regarding your question, I have a similar need. Did you get to be able to to it?
thanks in advance,
Edgar

No performance gain when using local interfaces

Hello,
I'm doing some tests to compare performances between remote ejb interfaces and local ejb interfaces.
I have two stateless session beans EJB1 and EJB2, EJB1 calls a method on EJB2, this method receives one object as the only parameter and returns it immediately. The parameter is a big object (~700ko). My test consists simply of making 1000 calls from EJB1 to EJB2, one time with remote interfaces, one time with local interface. For both tests, the EJBs run in the same container, same VM.
The results show absolutely no differences between the remote and the local interface !
As I found these results a bit surprising, I changed the serialization method of my parameter object this way:
private void writeObject(java.io.ObjectOutputStream out) throws IOException {
System.out.println("writeObject(MyBigObject)");
out.defaultWriteObject();
just to check if my object is serialized when using remote interface. And the response is no.
So question is: is there an "undocumented optimization" of the stub/skel generated by weblogic which make local calls when calling a remote method inside the same VM ?
Some precisions:
- I'am using weblogic 8.1sp2
- When calling remotely my EJB2 from an external batch (running in a separate VM), I see the message "writeObject(MyBigObject)" so the serialization is done in this case.

<Fr?d?ric Chopard> wrote in message news:[email protected]..
So question is: is there an "undocumented optimization" of the stub/skel generated by weblogic which make local calls when callinga remote method inside the same VM ?
>
Some precisions:
- I'am using weblogic 8.1sp2
- When calling remotely my EJB2 from an external batch (running in a separate VM), I see the message "writeObject(MyBigObject)" sothe serialization is done in this case.
WebLogic 5.x, 6.x and 7.x do call by reference for co-located EJBs by default. 8.1 has this behavior turned off by default. You may
experience call-by-reference optimization in 8.1 only if it has been turned on explicitly in the deployment descriptor.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Slava Imeshev

Synchronous - asynchronous interface (RFC - XI - jdbc)

hello to everybody!
i want configure a synchronous - asynchronous interface (RFC - PI - jdbc) whit my PI 7.1
This RFC send 2 output tables to PI/XI and i want write it into 2 different tables in a SQL Server Database.
How can i do it?
i tried whit one mapping to a unique outbound datatype...but only header table was insert and not rows.
i tried whit 2 Receiver Interfaces but i have on mapping the follow error:
Multiple inbound interfaces not supported for synchronous calls
so??
other possibility?
BPM?
please help me
Thanks
Alessandro

Hi,
I have a similar problem; I have JMS - PI - RFC synchronous scenario. I will receive message from JMS, and depending on the data received, I should call either of two RFCs (NOT BOTH). The BAPI return message should then be sent back to JMS.
Hence, I have one "Sender/Outbound" Message Interface, one receiver determination for that Message Interface - in which there is "one" receiver (backend SAP system).
In "Interface Determination", I specifed the two BAPIs as two Interfaces, and defined conditions based on "context objects" - since I need to know the Interface Mapping "dynamically"
However, I get the error - "Multiple inbound interfaces not supported for synchronous calls ". any suggestions on how to proceed?
I am posting this question here as it is a related issue. Hope it is fine.
Thanks,
Archana

WM-PP interface - One TO / Mutiple TO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for