Wm - process posting change

Hi experts,
I am transfering a material from wm managed storage location to wm managed s.location.In MB1B with 311 mvt i have created material document.when i am doing lt06 two types of screens appearing.one is Process posting change:stock overiew which is LT05 screen.some times another screen appearing i.e Process posting change:generate t.o item (stock placement).please send suggestions. Rewards on helpful answers.

Dear Milind,
Please have a look at OSS notes nos. 965094 and 566090. As a rule, direct transfer order creation is possible if the posting triggered by the usage decision (to unrestricted use stock, for example) refers to the entire inspection lot quantity.
Best regards,
Christiane

Similar Messages

Issue with posting change note processing using movement type 309

while processing Posting change note using transaction LT05, i am getting error 'Available quantity is less than selected quantity'. we need the quantity in posting change note to be picked from same storage bin from where it has been picked during transfer posting using 309. currently, it is showing all storage bins in ascending order for selection while Posting change note posting.
if we reqwhile mass porcessing of Posting change note using LSMW, it pickes the 1st storage bin. if 1st storage bin quantity is less than selected quantity of PCN then it is showing above error.

Hi Vishal,
The materials are managed by batch? Please check the batches of the material in the different storage bins. SAP asign the storage bin taking into account the material batch number and the oldest quant.
When the storage bin is not indicated, SAP looks at the batch number, and goes to the storage bin where this batch for the material is allocated. If SAP find more than one storage bin, SAP consumes from the batch that has the oldest quant.
I really dont understand deeply your question.
Hope it helps.
Regards
Enzo

In wms posting change process

Hi gurus ,
Here the issue is in posting change what are the process how to transfer the material from
unristricted to blocked stock. can you give the process step by step .
and can explain the defference between the inventory management and warehouse management.
thanks inadvance.

Follow the process as below
Posting Changes
Bin to Bin Movements
1. Logistics  Logistics Execution  Internal Whse Processes  Bins and Stock  Bin Stock per Material u2013 LS24
2. Logistics  Logistics Execution  Internal Whse Processes  Stock Transfer  Create Transfer Order  No Source Object.
3.Transfer Order  Confirm  Transfer Order
4.Logistics  Logistics Execution  Internal Whse Processes  Bins and Stock  Bin Stock per Material
5.Logistics  Logistics Execution  Internal Whse Processes  Stock Transfer  Create Transfer Order  From Stock List
Posting Changes
Transfer Posting u2013 Material to Material
1.Logistics  Logistics Execution  Internal Whse Processes  Post Change  Via Inventory Management  Enter Posting Change
2.Environment  Stock Overview  Stock Material. To see the WM inventory, select the line, then select Environment  WM Stocks.
3.Logistics  Logistics Execution  Internal Whse Processes  Post Change  Via Inventory Management  Transfer Order  Create  From List of Posting Change Notices
4.Confirm TO, One Step
Why Warehouse management
Although it is possible for you to manage warehouse inventories using the Inventory Management (IM) application component, the primary difference between managing stock in WM and in IM is that in IM, the system can only display the total stock of a material for a storage location. If a warehouse is small and easily manageable, then the use of IM may be sufficient to fulfill your needs.
WM, on the other hand, offers the capability to manage stock quantities in each individual storage bin in highly complex storage facilities. This means that, with WM, you can optimize the use of all storage bins, mix pallets belonging to several owners in randomly slotted warehouses and know exactly where a particular material is located in the warehousing complex at all times.

How to clear Open Posting Changes in LU04

Dear Expert,
How to process the Stucked PCN in LU04 Because when i am trying to create a TO w.ref to PCN in LU04 it shows
that BIn qty is zero & when I check LS24 for that material & I found bin qty is zero.
So now how to clear from PCN
Thanks & Regards,
Olet Malla

if you get the message "Dest. data" is the same as the "Source data" in all fields" then it is exactly so, and the movement does not make any sense as it does not change anything.
You have to stop such movements already in MM to avoid this error.
SAP explains this in OSS Note 384044 - Error L2146 when processing posting change notice
Solution
You can set the status of the posting change notice to completed by canceling the respective material document. In future, you can avoid those cases by setting message M7104 to 'E' (error) in table T160M; after this, the material documents which contain identical destination and source data can no longer be posted and therefore the system does no longer create such posting change notices. Before you should however cancel all available material documents with identical source and destination data for which there are open posting change notices. Otherwise the cancellation is terminated with error message M7104.

Error occurred during WM processing for posting change delivery

Hi Experts,
I am getting the following error when i try to create Outbound delivery aginst PO.
"L9 612 Error occurred during WM processing for posting change delivery"
Diagnosis
    The indicator AUFER from the delivery type contradicts the
    storage location constellation that was determined by the
    WM system.
    TVLK-AUFER = '<VAR2>'
    WM = '<VAR1>'
1.Purchase order is Stock transport order ME21N ( UB)
2.Try to create Outbound using VL10B and i am getting the above error,
Thanks in advance.
Cheers...Gopi

Hi Gopi,
Looking at problem you discribed, I am assuming you are using the delivery type other than "NL".
The reason for this error is the indicator "order required" in delivery type defination set to 'X : sales order required' and you have assigned this delivery type to the purshasing document UB in STO customising. So the requirement of delivery defination of having prior document as sales order is conflicting.. so the error is there.
Resolution:
Please change the assigned delivery type to NL to purchasing document type UB in SPRO> MM> Purchase order>set up for STO>assign delivery type and checking rule.
If you have custome delivery type the go to spro> LE> shipping>deliveries>define delivery type
change the order required from X to "B".
Hope this will help.
Regards,
Sudhir

WM settings of processing the posting change in the background?

Hello,
When WM is active and usage decision is made then posting change is generated in 922 area in WM. We need to process this posting change.
My question is, how can I make the process automated as follows.
u201CWhen usage decision is made in quality then, then WM stock will turn in to unrestricted and posting change generation and process should happen in the background.u201D
What are the related settings of processing the posting change in the background?
Thanks

Dear Milind,
Please have a look at OSS notes nos. 965094 and 566090. As a rule, direct transfer order creation is possible if the posting triggered by the usage decision (to unrestricted use stock, for example) refers to the entire inspection lot quantity.
Best regards,
Christiane

PI 7.31 (single stack) posting RFC gives this error: RFC_ERROR_SYSTEM_FAILURE: Processing of change number CO-01234 cancelled (raised by system ECCHostXYZ)

I'm trying to determine if I am dealing with an RFC connection issue or just an error resulting from the RFC itself.
The error says "Processing of change number...cancelled (raised by...ECCHostXYZ)".
I thought this was a problem with my RFC config because it is labeled as "RFC_ERROR_SYSTEM_FAILURE".
However, when I google that specific message, it appears to be an error specific to change order creation.
Here’s my google search: http://goo.gl/ZhKsm3
Here is the error again:
RFC_ERROR_SYSTEM_FAILURE: Processing of change number CO-01234 cancelled (raised by system ED1|ecc-host-xyz)
When I check ST22, I see no RFC errors.

Hi Jody,
No st22 exception is needed to be throwed in order to raise a controlled exception in the RFC.
You would need to check the RFC in the ECC system with the data that you are sending from PI, if the data is the same, you would need to check PI user RFC roles with the ECC roles user that you used to check the data integrity in the ECC test.
To avoid this error you can do a Z RFC to wrap the standard RFC and to control the exceptions errors with a BAPIRET2 strucutre to return to PI.
Hope this helps.
Regards.

Two TOs got created for a single Posting Change

Dear All,
A material document with movement type 309 got posted in a plant where WM is active.Here the material is moving from one batch to another batch.
The material document has 100 items.For each item when this movement happens a Posting Change will get created in WM and this will get converted to TO immediately through background job.
For all the materials except one this is happening fine, ie if for example if the quantity in the material doc is say 100 PC,then posting change will get created for 100 PC and this gets converted to single TO with 100 pc
But for one materal , for a Posting change of qty 90, two TOs got created with same qty ie 90 pcs each.
Please let me know your thoughts on this.What may be the reasons for this
Regards
Shyam

Dear RK and Arakish,
Thanks for the replies.
But i think i need to expalin you the issue in detail.
Problem Description:
1) Single Posting change getting converted to two TOs with same quantity each
2) Unable to go into display mode or change mode of Posting Change because of Error message. u201CPosting change quantity less than quantity already postedu201D
Message no. L2145
Sceanrio:
Material Document is posted with 309 movement,for moving a single material from single batch to different batches. The material document consists of 140 line items for the same material, but movement happening to 140 different batches.
For example First line item of the material document corresponds to movement of the material
From batch 1530040 to batch 71656W01 with quantity 105.438 DIE
Second line item
From batch 1530040 to batch 71656W02 with quantity 105.374 DIE
For each line item, once the movement is posted in IM, corresponding Posting Change get posted in WM with the same Quantity. A background job converts Each Posting Change to single TO with same quantity.
For example: For the first line item , Posting change 713513 got created with quantity 105.438 DIE which got converted to TO 1057743 with same quantity ie 105.438 DIE
Issue:
But only for one line item, the Posting Change with Quantity 90.901 DIE got converted to two TO s of quantity 90.901 each. And the posting change status is Partially Processed
Because of this, we are not able to go inside the Posting Change neither in the Display mode or Change mode due to the above mentioned error message.
Please let me know your thoughts on this
Regards
Shyam

Transfer Order auto create for Posting Change not working

Hello Gurus -
When we release an inspection lot from "Q" status, it creates a posting change notice, and we have it configured to create a TO in the background to the same bin, and auto confirm. The desired and intended result is to take something from "Q" status to unrestricted status, while keeping it in the same bin - and avoiding the user having to deal with the transfer orders. Essentially it is seamless and all in the background, the user just sees that he has changed something from quality status to unrestricted.
It works fine when the entire quantity is selected for the usage decision, but when a partial usage decision is made, the transfer order does not create - and requires processing in LU04 for the posting change.
Why would this work for an entire qty, but not work for a partial qty - and simply require someone to go in to LU04 and hit "create transfer order" - with no additional information?
Any help would be most appreciated. Does it have something to do with a setting of quants?

Hi,
In case of a usage decision for a partial quantity, it is not possible to create the Transfer Order for the generated posting change notice automatically. This is only possible when the full quantity is released. The same happens if you release a partial quantity and post the rest to blocked stock or scrap. The reason is, there needs to be a user decision, which part of the quantity has to be posted, this is necessary for example when the quantity is distributed in the warehouse over many storage bins. But even if the full quantity is on one storage bin, there is no automatic TO creation. You can see this also in the online
processing (LT05), in case of partial quantities you have to enter the selected quantity in the quant list, for a full posting this is not necessary.
Hope this helps,
Sinéad Curran

How to create automatic Transfer Order for posting change delivery mvt.321?

Hi,
We are using HU with WM functionality; While posting stocks after UD, the system creates a posting change delivery instead of directly posting the stock to unrestricted stock from quality stock.
Now that we have to process the ourbound delivery bu creating a transfer order and confirming it and also do a Post Goods Issue against delivery then only the system posts the stock into unrestricted stock.
Our client doesn't want to go thro' these process steps. They would like the stock to be posted to unrestricted automatically after UD stock posting (movement type 321). Is there a way out to automatically process the posting change delivery in the background including Transfer order creation and confirmation and PGI please?
Thank you,
Regards,
Madhavkrishnaa.

Pls see the customizing.
SPRO: Logistic Excution>Warehouse management>interfaces-->Define Quality management

Storage bin available when posting change is not confirmed completely

Dear Gurus, I have a question for you:
My costumer wants to do a posting change when the material is released from QM with a decision usage from Q to unrestricted use. The process is done in two steps: with LU04 the TO is generated and with LT12 is confirmed. When the TO is generated the position is half confirmed. With LT21 we can see the row for the ST (lets say ST 504 Open Storage type) and a second row 922 TR-ZONE. The first row appears green (as confirmed) and the second row appears red (Not confirmed).
My costumer says that " beacause of the strategy given for the storage entry, the storage bin released in the TO (not confirmed completely yet) is available at this moment.
If the storage bin is still physically full, the carrier will found not space for leaving the goods even SAP is telling him there is space available at this storage bin."
I have read that once yo start a TO the storage bin is blocked until the transaction is fully confirmed.
If this is correct I need to demostrate it and I don not find the way to do it.
I hope you understand my explanation and give me any clue.
I appreciate very much some help.
Al

agmogena wrote:
Ok, I will tell you the configuration I have. Lets point in a movement 921 quality to unrestricted use.
> Type Storage origin: 902 EQ and RC flags are set on. (confirmation control for storage type)
> Type storage TR: 922 are set on.
>
> Movement type 921 the flags for Confirm immed and Propose confirm are NOT set.
>
> I do a LU01 to create a intruction to change a material from Q to Unrestricted.
> with LT05 I create the TO.
> At this time if I look LT21 the TO created I see the tag source with two positions one for TS 902 green color and the second 922 in red.
> For the tag of target We can see the first position 922 In red and the second position 902 in green color.
>
> Perhaps this detailed explanation will help you to fully understand the scenario.
>
> Thank you again,
>
> Al.
From the above it isn't entirly clear that the first part of the T.O. is actualy confirmed, my settings are to autoconfirm this so I have no example to look at in my system. Perhaps the display shows the first line green before any actual confirmation..
I assume the stock status has not changed when you first view the T.O.? If the t.o. is partly confirmed I would expect to see the stock status changed and a neg in 922 until the second part is confirmed. Perhaps there is no confirmation at all yet, in LT21 what is the confirmation status? If you view the transfer order header there would be a partial confirmation showing with a yellow triangle, do you see this or no confirmation indicated at all?

Clearing posting change notices

Hi All,
I'm trying to close out posting change notices manually by marking the status as U through LU02. Not able to create TO and clear this as the stock is no longer available and these are very old ones.
The problem is that the source and destination data are the same and its throwing an error.
Can you suggest any ways to clear these open posting changes
Regards,
Ashwin

Sap provided corrrection program to clear the posting change notices.Develop this program in your system then check.We are using 4.6c version.
To set the posting change in question to processed (U), please
implement the following correction program in your system.
1) Create program 'ZLTEST00' with type '1' and application 'L' with the
following code:
report zltest00.
tables: lubu.
parameters: w-no like lubu-lgnum, "warehouse number
post-no like lubu-ubnum, "posting change notice
status like lubu-statu, "status
update. "update
select single * from lubu where lgnum = w-no
and ubnum = post-no.
write: / lubu-lgnum,
lubu-ubnum,
'Status old >', lubu-statu,
'Status new >', status.
if update ne space.
update lubu set statu = status
where lgnum = w-no
and ubnum = post-no.
if sy-subrc = 0.
write: / 'Update posting change notice'.
else.
write: / 'No update posting change notice'.
endif.
else.
write: / 'No update posting change notice'.
endif.
To run above correction program:
1) You have to indicate warehouse number, posting change number and the
status which you want to set in the posting change.
2) Without including the UPDATE-parameter, the program only shows the
posting change, or
3) When you mark the parameter UPDATE then the posting change will be
changed.

Cannot have execute_query in post-change but can have it when-radio-changed

why is it possible to put execute_query in a when-radio-changed trigger but one cannot put it in
a post-change or post-text-item trigger? (11.1.1.4)
For example I want to ask for a year, and a month. I don't much feel like creating radio items for all those years. Whenever a year
or a month is changed I want it to reconstruct the where clause and execute the query. But the year not being a radio group
is more problematic about how to get execute_query to run. What is thinking here? I think that a text item post-change deserves as much power as a radio_group change! It's unfair.

Over the years, I have found that the people that complain about Oracle Forms the most are the people that refuse to learn how Oracle Forms works. You can't expect to develop in a any framework unless you learn the rules of the framework. I've seen numerous complaints about the lack of documentation on Forms and yet the single most important form of documentation is the Oracle Forms Help system. The answer to virtually every question you might have can be found in the Forms help system, but it helps to understand a little about how Forms functions so you can ask the right questions in the help system.
I also find it hard to understand how an employer will throw someone, with little or no exposure to Oracle Forms, into a Forms project and expect them to "Pick it up" along the way rather than take the time and expense to send them to an Oracle Forms class. How can the employer expect the employee to be successful if they are unwilling to give them the resources they need to be successful. If you are one of the unfortunates that are in this situation, then you could at least perform a simple Google search on "Forms Tutorials" and you will find numerous on-line "Free" tutorials. Don't worry about the Forms version used by these tutorials as you are only going through the tutorial to learn how to create a Form and how the Forms tool interacts with the database; which is doesn't matter which Forms version you are using because this part hasn't changed all that much between the Forms versions.
There are even some really good books (however, quite old) that you can purchase that teach you all the basics of Oracle Forms. Here are just a few:
Developing Oracle Forms Applications by Albert Lulushi
Oracle Forms Developer's Handbook by Albert Lulushi
Oracle Developer: Advanced Forms and Reports by Peter Koletske
Programming with Oracle Developer by Matthew BennettThese are just a few books and yes they are all for older versions of Oracle Forms. But the concepts you will learn apply to any Forms version.
While I admit that it is inconvenient that I can't call a Restricted built-in from certain triggers once you understand the reasons why you can't call Restricted built-ins it make sense why Oracle built their event model the way they did. By calling certain restricted built-ins in a trigger, such as the When-Validate-Item trigger, you could very easily cause an an endless loop to occur in your application. For example, if you were allowed to call the GO_BLOCK or GO_ITEM built-ins from a When-Validate-Item trigger you could cause cascading validation events to occur. While this is not a bad thing in and of itself, but what would happen if I sent the Forms Navigation cursor to go to an item before I had completed my validation logic. The item I sent the cursor too also happens to have validation logic assigned to it that just so happens to send the navigation cursor to the item I just left. Understand, the first item has not yet completed it's validation process and the second item sends the cursor right back the first item - which triggers a new validation event on the first item. Now I've got compounding events in the execution stack and I've put my application into a loop that I will never get out of because I've got validation logic that never completes successfully so the validation event never exits - it just keeps running and running.
At first, you might say that it is the developers responsibility to ensure this does not happen and the developer should be more careful with their code to prevent this from happening and you would be right. We (developers) are responsible for writing safe code. However, after a while, software manufacturers eventually put restrictions in place because there are enough irresponsible developers out there causing problems and the only way to fix the issue is through the use of framework restrictions.
Having said that, Oracle Forms has certain restrictions for good reasons. Because you don't understand what those reasons are is not a good reason to complain about the restrictions. Rather, I would hope, that your lack of understanding of a particular framework/methodology would encourage you discover the "Why's" and "How come's" of the framework.
The simple fact of the matter is you cannot be successful with Oracle Forms unless you learn how to program within the Forms Framework. You can't take C++, Java or any other programming language and apply the rules of programming these languages to Forms. You absolutely must learn how Oracle Forms operates and what the rules are for developing successful Forms applications.
That's my two cents on the topic. I'm trying to start a flame war; I'm just tired of hearing people complain about Forms just because they don't understand or haven't taken the time to understand how Forms operations and what the rules are for developing within Oracle Forms.
Sincerely,
Craig...
Edited by: CraigB on Aug 2, 2011 12:38 PM

RF Queue - Posting Changes Not Appearing

Hi All,
We are currently implementing RF in our warehouse.
I have a problem with regards to posting changes - I cannot get them to appear in a queue. Every time I create a posting change TO, it does not adopt the queue (LTAK - QUEUE) as defined in customising, so therefore does not appear in the RF monitor.
We do have a strange set up....in that we use a QM posting change as part of our goods in process, so it may be something to do with that.
It may help if someone could explain how posting changes are handled within a normal RF environment. What are they typically used for and how would the queue assignment be configured?
Any help appreciated.
Thanks
Guy

Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
Yes, I do have entries against transfer type 'U'.
May I ask which screen control setting should be used? I have tried 'Preparation screen for placement into stock' - I can't get any TOs to appear with this setting.
However, when I use ' Single item screen' I can at least get an entry in the RF monitor, although I can't make any queue differentiation.
I think this issue may be of our own making, as we are effectively using posting changes to perform putaway -- I presume normally posting change TOs would not be moving stock from one place to another?
Regards
Guy

JClient equivalent post-change trigger and JTextField issue.

Hi,
JClient 10.1.2
What is the equivalent event listener I could use to obtain the forms post-change functionality?
With following components:
JTextField
JComboBox
JCheckBox
For example on a JComboBox I would like to display a warning message dialog if a special value has been selected.
I've tried using itemStateChanged method on a combo box but the message dialog is displayed everytime the row gains currency.
Should I use focusGained to store the previous value and in the focusLosted method, check for a change?
What would you recommend?
One more question on JTextField, what is the method to track "global changes".
I've tried using the DocumentListener, but the methods changedUpdate,insertUpdate and removedUpdate are fired on each keyboard action.
Is there a way to track "global changes" on the whole text?
Thanks
Frederic

You can work at setAttribute (Vo or Entity) level.
You should be carefull, however, because in a cliente server environment it looks like the forms post-change event but in a 3 tier J2EE environment it's a server event and is not possible to interact with the screen in processing that event.
Any other comment is wellcome.
Bye
Tullio

Wm - process posting change

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for