Word Document size is increased after migration?

Hello
We migrated from Sp2003 to Sp2010 and noticed that all item documents in each document library, file size is increased.
I compared the couple of documents, everything is same.
Is it by default depending on framework or what is logic behind this.
Can any one please explain on this?
Avi

I did experience this after a migration, and attributed it to differences in versions of sql server that were being used. Random checking resulted in identical results, just like you. After using it for many months, we got no end user complaints about it.
Needless to say, having documents of different sizes after a migration can be very discomforting for just about all involved parties.
In my case, there was a difference, when migrating via a 3rd party tool there
were file size differences, when migrating via standard MS tooling (by exporting individual site collections, but also by attaching content db's), we experienced
no differences.
Kind regards,
Margriet Bruggeman
Lois & Clark IT Services
web site: http://www.loisandclark.eu
blog: http://www.sharepointdragons.com

Similar Messages

Is it possible to retrieve word documents from my imac after upgrading with yosemite from a 10.8 to a 10.10?

I have just upgraded my iMac from a 10.8 to a 10.10 with OS X Yosemite and have lost Microsoft Word. Is there any way to retrieve my lost documents and what is a replacement for the microsoft word program? When I try to open a word document a notice comes up informing me 'you can't open the app "Microsoft Word" because PowerPC apps are no longer supported'. Are there any options here? Appreciate any info.

LibreOffice
OpenOffice
Office Alternatives - Free

Sharepoint 2013 Content DB increases after migration

Hi,
We are migrating the Sharepoint 2010 site to Sharepoint 2013, we are using Windows server 2012, SQL server 2012 in a seperate DB server. When we copy the DB from SP 2010 its size was 100 GB, after the migration the Size of the DB increases twice and
now the DB size is 300 GB.
I don knw what happened. What might be the reason for the size increase and the site is not used by any users till now.
Any help is much appreciated.
Smile Always

That would make sense if you were moving from RBS to non RBS or in a 2007 to 2010 migration. 2010 to 2013 is less expected to cause this as the 2010 schema shouldn't change in that respect.
A Shrink DB might do the job (note: it'll shrink then expand back a bit when it starts getting used), there's a less invasive proces below.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sowmyancs/archive/2012/06/29/alldocversions-amp-alldocstreams-table-size-after-upgrading-to-sharepoint-2010.aspx

Documents won't save after migration

I recently bought a MacBook Air. I did a migration of my MacBook Pro to my new Air. Now, when I open documents on the Air from the Macintosh HD icon on my desktop (e.g. word or excel so far in my experience), after I make changes to those documents I can't save them. I get a messge that it's 'read only'. So I change the name and hit save. But then I get an error that I can't save it to the HD, so I save it to the desktop.
Now, I also have multiple copies of the doc that I'm working on saved to my desktop (I guess from saving during the time I work on them), and I'm forbidden from dragging them to the trash.
This of course must have something to do with the migration but I can't figure it out.
Please help??!

Thank you so much, that fixed it! It seemed so easy but I would never have figured that out

Backup size is increased after resync catalog

Hi everyone,
I have describe my problem, if anyone have a solution please provide me.
Rman catalog database version : 10.2.0.1.0, OS : red hat linux
Target database version : 10.2.0.5.0, OS : solaris 10
rman catalog database space is full, then i move my example tablespace to another location, but i forgot to change the ownership of new file.
And I have no backup of my rman catalog database. so i offline the datafile first for opening the rman catalog database after opening the database I have offline the whole example tablespace and this tablespace cannot contain any thing related the catalog.
after that I used the command : crosscheck archivelog all;
DELETE EXPIRED ARCHIVELOG ALL
then i run the command : CROSSCHECK BACKUP;
DELETE EXPIRED BACKUP;
then i run the command : report obsolete;
delete obsolete;
then i run the command : RESYNC CATALOG;
then i run the command : change archivelog all validate;
after doing all the thing when I am taking a backup of archive log by using following command :
run {allocate channel c1 device type disk format '/appl2/prodback_rman/prod_fullbackup/ARCH_%d_%s.bak';
backup archivelog all;
before performing all the above thing my archive backup of whole day is around 5gb but after the above thing my archive backup of one day is around : 126gb
and my level0 backup is alright after and before the above thing and the size is around : 139gb
the script for the full backup is :
run {allocate channel c1 device type disk format '/appl2/prodback_rman/prod_fullbackup/FULL_%d_%s_%c.bak';
backup incremental level 0 database skip offline;
after that I have perform the incremental level 1 backup by using the following script :
run {allocate channel c1 device type disk format '/appl2/prodback_rman/prod_fullbackup/INC1_%d_%s_%c.bak';
backup incremental level 1 database;
before the above activity the size of incremental backup is around : 4.5gb but after performing the above activity the incremental backup size is around : 120gb
it is very critical for me, if any one have the solution please provide me as early as possible.
Thanks & Regards
Rakesh Kumar

Hi Hemant K Chitale,
you said that I am using the COMPRESSED BACKUPSETs till 22-Jan, so I am posting
the rman configuration here that is used before all this happening and same
configuration is used right now.
but before resync catalog the archivelog is generated only one location then I used to archive log
dest for archive log generation then after 5 month I will resync my catalog. may be it is the
reason.
because there are no compressed backupset is defined in the rman configuration.
RMAN> show all;
RMAN configuration parameters are:
CONFIGURE RETENTION POLICY TO REDUNDANCY 2;
CONFIGURE BACKUP OPTIMIZATION ON;
CONFIGURE DEFAULT DEVICE TYPE TO DISK; # default
CONFIGURE CONTROLFILE AUTOBACKUP ON;
CONFIGURE CONTROLFILE AUTOBACKUP FORMAT FOR DEVICE TYPE DISK TO '/appl2/prodback_rman/prod_fullbackup/ctrl_%F';
CONFIGURE DEVICE TYPE DISK PARALLELISM 2;
CONFIGURE DATAFILE BACKUP COPIES FOR DEVICE TYPE DISK TO 1;
CONFIGURE ARCHIVELOG BACKUP COPIES FOR DEVICE TYPE DISK TO 1; # default
CONFIGURE CHANNEL 1 DEVICE TYPE DISK FORMAT '/appl2/prodback_rman/prod_fullbackup/prod_%d_%s_%c.bak', '/appl2/prodback_rman/usb/prod_%d_%s_%c.bak';
CONFIGURE MAXSETSIZE TO 20 G;
CONFIGURE ENCRYPTION FOR DATABASE OFF; # default
CONFIGURE ENCRYPTION ALGORITHM 'AES128'; # default
CONFIGURE ARCHIVELOG DELETION POLICY TO NONE; # default
CONFIGURE SNAPSHOT CONTROLFILE NAME TO '/appl2/prodback_rman/prod_fullbackup/snapcf_PROD.f';
Archive log generation log on the daily basis.
SQL> select trunc(COMPLETION_TIME,'DD') Day, thread#,
round(sum(BLOCKS*BLOCK_SIZE)/1048576) MB,
count(*) Archives_Generated from v$archived_log
group by trunc(COMPLETION_TIME,'DD'),thread# order by 1;
DAY THREAD# MB ARCHIVES_GENERATED
04-FEB-13 1 2776 37
05-FEB-13 1 16767 220
06-FEB-13 1 16545 216
07-FEB-13 1 15772 208
08-FEB-13 1 15056 198
09-FEB-13 1 18486 244
10-FEB-13 1 17591 232
11-FEB-13 1 18163 238
12-FEB-13 1 15062 198
13-FEB-13 1 26383 342
14-FEB-13 1 36279 462
DAY THREAD# MB ARCHIVES_GENERATED
15-FEB-13 1 34010 432
16-FEB-13 1 32230 413
17-FEB-13 1 31904 408
18-FEB-13 1 33448 426
19-FEB-13 1 34639 444
20-FEB-13 1 36684 468
21-FEB-13 1 27547 352
right know the archive log backup size by rman is around 19gb per day.
so tell me how we reduce the size of my archive log backup according to
my rman configuration and how can i reduce the archive log generation on
my production server on daily basis.
Thanks & Regards
Rakesh Kumar

Explain plan cost it increases after migrating Oracle 9.2.0 to 10.2.0.3

Hi:
Recently the migration was made, we are testing (I'm developer) the performance in some querys, but the majority is but slow,I do not understand the reason because the new equipment has processing capacity much more.
for example , a report , in 9i it is executed in 45 segs, in 10G it is executed in 10 minutes!!!
Another example: the next explain plan, it's the same query and the same parameters . In oracle 9i COST=799 In Oracle 10G COST=2337
What happens? Any idea?
In oracle 9i COST=799
SELECT STATEMENT Hint=HINT: FIRST_ROWS 1 799
SORT GROUP BY 1 74 799
VIEW 1 74 786
SORT GROUP BY 1 100 786
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID SMRPCMT 1 27 1
NESTED LOOPS 1 100 774
NESTED LOOPS 3 219 773
NESTED LOOPS 3 177 772
NESTED LOOPS 3 171 771
NESTED LOOPS 3 123 770
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID SFBETRM 7 K 73 K 22
INDEX RANGE SCAN SFBETRM_KEY_INDEX2 7 K 24
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID SGBSTDN 1 31 1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN PK_SGBSTDN 1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID STVMAJR 1 16 1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN PK_STVMAJR 1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID STVCAMP 1 2 1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN PK_STVCAMP 1
INDEX RANGE SCAN SMRPATR_KEY_INDEX 1 14 1
INDEX RANGE SCAN SMRPCMT_KEY_INDEX 1 1
In Oracle 10G COST=2337
SELECT STATEMENT Hint=FIRST_ROWS 1 2337
SORT GROUP BY 1 66 2337
VIEW 1 66 2336
SORT GROUP BY 1 158 2336
NESTED LOOPS 1 158 2335
NESTED LOOPS 1 142 2334
NESTED LOOPS 1 140 2333
NESTED LOOPS 1 126 2332
NESTED LOOPS 3 297 2330
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID SFBETRM 7 K 73 K 67
INDEX RANGE SCAN SFBETRM_KEY_INDEX2 7 K 6
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID SGBSTDN 1 89 1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN PK_SGBSTDN 1 1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID SMRPCMT 1 27 1
INDEX RANGE SCAN SMRPCMT_KEY_INDEX 1 1
INDEX RANGE SCAN SMRPATR_KEY_INDEX 1 14 1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID STVCAMP 1 2 1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN PK_STVCAMP 1 1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID STVMAJR 1 16 1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN PK_STVMAJR 1 1
Thank you so much by advance.
(sorry by my bad english)

"Cost", as determined by the CBO, is a relative number, not an absolute number. A "cost" of 799 in 9i is not the same as a "cost" of 799 in 10g.
The CBO is 10g is substantially different as compared to 9i. Performance issues encountered after the upgrade are not uncommon. Pl refer to these MOS Doc to help troubleshoot your issue -
754931.1 - Cost Based Optimizer - Common Misconceptions and Issues - 10g and Above
466181.1 - 10g Upgrade Companion
I would also recommend you upgrade to 10.2.0.4, as it is the latest and most stable version of 10g.
HTH
Srini

Word documents won't print after upgrade

I upgraded my G4 Cubefrom OS9.2.2 to Panther successfully. I also upgraded to a new printer. When I try to print documents created in my old system on OS9 in microsoft Word, they open up OK in Classic, but the print click brings up the old printer. How do I select the new printer? The printer works fine with old Appleworks documents. Also, will my very old 1998 Word programme work in OSX or will I continue to need Classic for it to function? Any thoughts would be most welcome. Thanks.

You must install an OS 9 printer driver for the new printer and remove the driver for the old printer.
The version of Word that you have is an OS 9 only version. You can use it while running OS X via the Classic emulation but the program will not run natively in OS X. For that you will need to upgrade to an OS X version.
If you plan to continue using OS X you will need to upgrade all your old software to OS X versions including AppleWorks (6.2.9 upgrade is available for owners of AW.)

How to remove tab stops at one shot after importing a word document

HI everyone,
This is my first post in Framemaker Community as I am moving from RH to FM.
I have an issue with respect to importing word documents to Framemaker.
After I have import a word to doc to FM multiple tab stops are created.
Now, although I remove the tab stops manually once, If I place my mouse in the next line , the tab stops are seen again.
Is there any shortcut wherein I can remove tab stops at one go after I import a word document in Framemaker.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Parag

Edit > Find / Change
Find: Text: [ \x08 ]
Change To Text: [ \x20 ]
<*> Document
[ Change All ]
This would change all tabs to ordinary spaces. You can actually just type a tab and space character, but I used the hex notation so you see what you're doing. The space could be any other character(s) you desire, or no characters at all (make sure the To Text: field is empty).
Hex codes?
Found here on one of my installs:
C:\Program Files (x86)\Adobe\FrameMaker9\Documents\Character_Sets.pdf

Search is not working for MS Word documents

Hi,
serious help required for search operation.
Search operation is not working for MS Word Documents.
i noticed that, after chekin word documents its status comes as
GENWWW.
i already enable file format & extension for word file.
can somebody help me in this regard.
Thankx in advance

Hi
Please enable the tracing option for :
requestaudit,indexer
Enable Full Verbose Tracing .
Checkin the Ms-Word document and once it fails then check the view server o/p under System Audit Information page and post the error message happening for indexing operation .
Thanks
Srinath

I've created a Word document from a pdf file. How do i make it editable?

I've created a Word document from a pdf file. How do i make it editable?

Hi Kaz1,
The Word document should be editable after the conversion is complete. What happens when you try to edit it?
Thanks,
David

Adobe interactive form(ABAP WD)size is increasing & not opening from EP UWL

Hello All,
Adobe interactive form (ABAP WD) size is increasing after cleansing data from MDM and the form is not opening from portal UWL.
Same application is working fine in Dev and Qa environment. In dev and QA the form size is around 150 KB after cleansing data from MDM. Some reason in production it is more than 2 MB. FYI - We have multiple app servers in production.
/Padmanaban

Hi Babi,
In the adobe form layout library Use the Submit(which internally means submit to SAP) button from the Webdynpro Native category.
Only this button action can connect adobe to web dynpro.
Whenever we click on this particular button the event will be trigger in the ONsubmit event of interactive form UI element in the webdynpro.There we can write our abap code.Hope this will help you.
Regards,
Simi A M
Edited by: amsimi on Mar 22, 2011 11:37 AM

Increased file sizes after migrating to the Ultra2

Upgrading from a 10,000E to an Ultra2 and have noticed that many of the files that I had on my 10,000E have grown after migrating to the Ultra2. The sizes vary from doubling to fractional, but there is a consistant increase in the sizes of files. Anyone have any ideas?

Are you seeing the size increase when you do an "ls -l" and get the size or is
the space used in the file system (ls -s / du / df) just higher than it was on the last machine?
If it is the latter and the file systems are using more space, it could be due to sparse
files. In other words, files with holes in them. Utilities such as tar and cpio do
not understand holes in files and when the files are moved, the holes are filled
in and the space required for the file increases. ufsdump understands the file
system and can recreate the holes in the files.
If the actual size of the file is increasing (ls -l), that is strange and more details
would be required.
Alan
Sun Developer Technical Support
http://www.sun.com/developers/support

After scanning my document and converting to Microsoft Word the size of characters are different

After scanning my document and converting to Microsoft Word the size of characters are different and things like puntuation are distorted. How do I get the uniformity like the original?

Of course what lands in the Word file will differ from the viewed picture/image of text created by the scanner.
(The output of all scanners is always an image file. For an image of textual content the best output file format is TIFF.)
So you scan the hardcopy of text.
The scanner output image (picture) is brought into PDF.
At this point the only PDF page content that you can export to Word is the image (nope, no "text" just the image).
Consequently you use Acrobat's OCR feature to do OCR of the image of text.
With a decent paper source, proper resolution and a black and white image you'll get acceptable accuracy of recognition of the pictures of the characters.
(the Optical Character Recognition)
Acrobat's Searchable Image and Searchable Image (Exact) provides output that used text rendering mode 3 (no fill, no stroke for the glyphs).
So, invsible / hidden text.
The third OCR method is ClearScan.
You could play with each of the three to see what goes into a Word file.
Might try export to RTF, DOC and DOCX as well.
Anyway -- What is exported is the OCR output; Not the image of text.
And, of course, the image of the text is not the imprint on the paper that was scanned.
Each step to the way you have some deviation.
Once you have the exported PDF content in a Word file you can use Word to cleanup as desired / needed.
OR
Prop up the hardcopy and transcribe to a Word file.
Be well...

Mailbox sizes increase dramatically after migration to exchange 2013

After I migrate mailboxes from exchange 2010 mailbox to 2013, the size increases.
For example -
On exchange 2010 I run get-mailboxstatistics: TotalItemSize : 6.706 GB
On exchange 2013: TotalItemSize : 9.374 GB
Anand_N

Hi Anand,
Please note that the actual space used by the mailbox database will not increase. This only refers to the attribution of space used by each individual mailbox. Actually, this happens due to the inclusion of all item properties into quota calculations, providing
a more accurate computation of space consumed by items within their mailbox. However, you can adjust mailbox size and increase mailbox quota by 40% before moving.
You can follow below cmdlet in order to increase "ProhibitSendQuota" value for all users that are not using the database quota defaults:
Get-Mailbox -ResultSize Unlimited -Filter {UseDatabaseQuotaDefaults -eq $False} |
Where {$_.ProhibitSendQuota -ne "unlimited"} | ForEach {Set-Mailbox $_ -ProhibitSendQuota "$($($_.ProhibitSendQuota).Value.ToMB() * 1.4)MB" -WhatIf}
You can have a look on this link to prevent the cause :
Mailbox migration from 2010 to 2013
Hope, this will be helpful for you.

Work book size increased by 4 times after migrating from BW3.5 to BI7

Hi Experts
work book size increased by 4 times after migrating from BW3.5 to BI7
our client runs the report using BI web report and exports to excel sheet.
she asks us to investigate why the size of the work book isincreased by 4 times after migrating from BW3.5 to BI7.
please let me know what you think.
thank you for reading this.
Regards
satish

ANY suggestion would be greatly appreciated

Word Document size is increased after migration?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for