Work Order Settlement Rule Determination

Hi Experts,
For T-code : IW32, can any one suggest any enhancements which triggers during following conditions:
1)While Releasing the Work order.
2)To redetemine settlement Rule i.e. I need to over wrtie a filed in Settlement rule i.e. "Setllement Reciever" with Cost center value.
3) Overwrite the default costcenter value in Location Tab with custom field value.
Thanks in advance,
With regards.

Hi Vani.
You must use either EXIT_SAPLCOIH_009 user exit or must configure workflow (STD object ISUSMORDER) .
Thanx
suresh.

Similar Messages

  • Work order SETTLEMENT RULE Error

    Workflow Work order SETTLEMENT RULE Error, but settlement is done no problem in updation. But notification error there.
    Notification of completion cannot be generated
    Problems occurred when generating a mail
    Error '9' when calling service 'SO_OBJECT_SEND'
    Error handling for work item 000112476185
    Work item 000112476185: Object 000020154849 method UPDATESETTLEMENTRULE cannot be executed
    Call transaction was canceled.
    No errors occurred -> Details in long text
    No errors occurred -> Details in long text
    Please advice what could be the reason this error.
    Best Regards,
    Prabhakar

    Message no. WL821
    Message no. FD009
    Message no. WL863
    Problems occurred when generating a mail
    Message no. SWF_RUN534
    Error handling for work item 000133673828
    Message no. SWF_RUN630
    Error '9' when calling service 'SO_OBJECT_SEND'
    Message no. SWF_RUN535
    Thanks,
    Prabhakar

  • Defaulting G/L account in work order settlement rule

    Hello,
    I have set my work order settlement profile, the default object to be G/L.  However, in the equipment master record, at the Organization tab (account assignment group), i don't see any field for G/L account.
    When i create settlement rule with default, i get error that rule cannot be created with default.
    Where can i enter the G/L account in the equipment master to enable the auto settlement rule creation?

    you can always explain the concept of FI account through Cost Center and CO account through Cost Element from Plant Maintenance and FI/CO organisation point of view and in relation to business process.
    As you cant define in master data you cant get it automatically copied into settlement rule and hence have to maintain it manually as system dont know which GL to use as settlement receiver as not maintained in master data.

  • Settlement rule determination in case of FXA

    Hi Experts
    My project is meant for settlement to asset.
    W.r.t. Networks, the settlement rule can be automated using strategy as 'receiver is WBS'.
    But, can we automate settlement rule determination except the specification of receiver for WBS?
    Because, each WBS is to settled for individual sub asset
    warm regards
    ramSiva

    Hi Virendra
    In my case, the client is initially creates CWIP assets manually (Capital work in progress, nothing but the AUC, however it can be seen as fixed asset)
    The CWIP assets can be more in number per project (one for each WBS or activity)
    Until completion of project, the settlements are made to CWIP assets.
    At completion, the transfer of all CWIP's to fixed asset is carried out in asset accounting.
    So, the different assets are available initially, but need to be manually assigned.
    Any standard program interface to upload based on the project strucxture?
    warm regards
    ramSiva

  • KO8G open work order settlement

    Hi,
    I am facing an issue with open work order settlement using KO8G or KO88.
    We are on 6.0 and PSM turned and New GL activated with a document splitting on fund mandatory flag turned on.
    When open work orders undergo WIP calculation through KKAI, it shows the the calculated amount in the GL account but when we execute KO88 or KO8G to settle this open work order amount to the GL, it gives me the below error
    GLT2201 "Balancing field "Fund" in line item 001 not filled"
    On debugging the KO88, its seen that the field fund does not flow in from the work order.
    This means that both my P&L accounts and my balance sheet accounts that offset the WIP posting does not have the fund field (which is a mandatory field for posting any document in the system).
    Has anyone come across such a situation?
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Pradeep
    Edited by: Pradeep Giri on May 30, 2009 4:07 AM

    Hey Vanessa,
    Sorry i have been really busy with work off late. I just got a moment and wanted to thank you for the help.
    I found a solution for it, we had FMDERIVE default the fund on the accounts used in WIP settlement as they are dedicated for those process.
    The cost is picked from the order and deposited on the P&L account which is now attached to the fund and this is further transferred to the balance sheet account with the fund information.
    Problem solved.
    Do you see any other implications on this?
    Thanks again.
    Pradeep

  • Open Work Order settlement - KO8G or KO88

    Hi,
    I am facing an issue with open work order settlement using KO8G or KO88.
    We are on 6.0 and PSM turned and New GL activated with a document splitting on fund mandatory flag turned on.
    When open work orders undergo WIP calculation through KKAI, it shows the the calculated amount in the GL account but when we execute KO88 or KO8G to settle this open work order amount to the GL, it gives me the below error
    GLT2201 "Balancing field "Fund" in line item 001 not filled"
    On debugging the KO88, its seen that the field fund does not flow in from the work order.
    This means that both my P&L accounts and my balance sheet accounts that offset the WIP posting does not have the fund field (which is a mandatory field for posting any document in the system).
    Has anyone come across such a situation?
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Pradeep

    Ashok,
    Thanks for the reply.
    We have a user exit to populate the order during its creation. this means the fund field is already residing on the order. so during settlement process, closed orders dont have a problem but when open orders are subject to settlement i.e WIP settlement, the cost on the order is not transferred to the GL account because of the fund missing as our financial statements should be balances by fund.
    Do you think an user exit can suffice this ? have you ever tried or come across such a scenario.
    Thanks
    Pradeep

  • For internal order settlement rule amount column is requied instead %

    Hi Gurus,
    For internal order settlement rule percentage is there but business wants  to settle from AUC to final asset by amount wise how can we do this.
    I tried to change the investment profile but it is coming amount field while saving it is not displaying.
    Please help in this regard
    Thank you.
    Ranganadh

    Hi
    Check the path
    IMG>Controlling>Internal Orders>Actual Posting>Settlement>Maintain Settlement Profile>Maintain Settlement Profile.
    Here there is a tick for amount settlement under Indicators. You need to maintain this check box for your requirements.
    Regards
    Sanil Bhandari

  • How to open field WERKS in Internal order settlement rule

    Hello experts,
    Could you explain please  how to add field PLANT (WERKS) in internal order settlement rules. I would like to fill out this field during the settlement process.
    Any advices will be very appreciated.
    Regards,
    Ivan

    HI Ivan,
    Please post more details on your business scenario. Why you want to add plant field in the rule?
    To which receiver you want settle your internal order? If you want to settle to a material for instance, plant will be one of the field available. Try double click on settlement rule to get to detailed screen.

  • Maintain internal order settlement rule using LSMW

    HI ALL
    I want to do mass maintenance of internal order settlement rule. Settlement category is PSG.
    But when I use LSMW to do KO02, I only can input one settlement receriver, the first line will be overwritten by the second line.
    I also see BAPI INTERNAL_ORDER_CREATE,but cannot find PSG as a settlement category.
    Does anyone know how to do this?
    THX
    Deelia

    Hi Lian
    When you do recording, enter two settlement rules..
    Then, before pressing the "DEFAULT ALL" button, change the Field names for the 2nd settlement rule
    The problem you described happens because the field names for both settlement rules are same.. Hence, it gets overwritten
    Assume that field name for Order is AUFNR... You can change the field name in recording to ZAUFNR for one of the fields
    See the screen shot, wherein I changed the name of the recorded field to _01, _15 and _70
    Br. Ajay M

  • Where can I define Account assignment category for order settlement rules

    Dear Gurus,
        When I used Tcode: CO07 to create a rework order for parent order. But I cann't find the Account assignment category = Ord (Order) in the maintain Settlement rule overview.
      Where can I define Account assignment category for order settlement rules?
      Please help me. Thanks!
    Regards
    Paul.

    I've resolved this question.
        Firstly, run OPJH - Define Order Types, we should assign settlement profile for the order type.
        Secondly, Run OKO7-Maintain Settlement Profile, find and mailtain the settlement profile. In 'Valid Receivers' we should set the field 'Order' = 1-(Settlement Optional).
        Thirdly, run CO07 - Create Order without material. We can find account assignment catetory 'ORD' in maintaining Settlement rule.
    Edited by: Paul Chan on Feb 16, 2009 5:15 AM

  • Reverse work order settlements

    Experts,
    I need to reverse all the work order settlements that were done in a month due to some error - Appreciate it if someone can let me know how to take care of this.
    All answers/inputs/thoughts will be duly appreciated and rewarded with points.
    Thanks,
    Nandita

    KO8G

  • Can User Exit works for Settlement Rule in Maintenance Order creation?

    Dear Experts,
    I have this situation where I tried to create an Internal Maintenance Order via IW31 for multiple equipments from different functional location (different cost centers) using the Object List.  However, the settlement rule has a problem to pull out as there's no Equipment in the reference object. That's the reason, I'm looking at the User Exit which I understand the IWO10027, can do the work.  Since I'm new to User Exit, can I enhance the settlement rule by the following condition.
    The costs spent on each equipment will be used as a basis of calculating the weightage (via equivalence no) for the settlement rule.
    Can it be done that way?
    regards,
    Abraham

    Sanjay,
    This data can be checked in the following user-exits:
    COZF0001: Change purchase req. for externally processed operation
    COZF0002: Change purchase req. for externally procured component
    PeteA

  • CProjects to Internal Order - settlement rule

    Hi,
    Having created an IO from cProjects, I get to see accouting error. Control Cockpit shows "No settlement rule exists for the Order ...".
    Going further, this error is coming in the way of the planned costs getting to IO, and subsequently the IO costs coming up in Fin Planning, in RPM.
    Please advise on the steps to correct the settlement rule issue. Resolving one issue is likely to solve many of my issues!
    Thanks.

    Yes. You cannot delete.
    If you want to use this new distribution rule from here onwards (means from this period ..) it is possible.
    Do the following
    1. For old distribution rule (i.e. for old cost center ) change the "valid to period" last month. You can directly change this by clicking the settlement rule in the order master data. 
    2. For new distribution rule give "valid from period"  whatever you want  (future periods).
    So that you need not delete the old distribution rule.. and from this month onwards your new distribution rule will work.
    Radha

  • Work order settlement issue

    Hi
    I am not an expert in Work orders and appreciate your input.
    A work order has been settled to a Sales order ( I can't understand the logic behind settling to a Sales Order). The Profit centre assigned to the sales order is wrong. I.e. they need it to be the same as that in the work order.
    1) Is it possible to reverse the settlement and
    2) change the profit centre in the Sales order
    3) Change the settlement rule of the work order
    The user informed the reason to settle the work order is just merely to close the work order. Is it mandatory to settle the work order in order to close. If so could you please explain the logic behind the requirement?
    Thanks & Regards
    Nadini

    Hey Vanessa,
    Sorry i have been really busy with work off late. I just got a moment and wanted to thank you for the help.
    I found a solution for it, we had FMDERIVE default the fund on the accounts used in WIP settlement as they are dedicated for those process.
    The cost is picked from the order and deposited on the P&L account which is now attached to the fund and this is further transferred to the balance sheet account with the fund information.
    Problem solved.
    Do you see any other implications on this?
    Thanks again.
    Pradeep

  • User exit for profitability segment in service order settlement rule

    Does anybody know if exit EXIT_SAPLKEAK_001 works for the profitability segment creation during the creation of a settlement rule of a service order?
    The context is the following: the company uses service orders which are settled periodically (it receives revenue from sales order which is posted to the service orders at time of billing, and also costs at time of goods issue). The profitability segment in the settlement rule of the service order needs to be the same as the one from the billing document that posted to the order.
    Can I use EXIT_SAPLKEAK_001 to find the characteristics from the billing document and populate it in the PSG of the settlement rule? If yes, could this be applied to only one specific service order type?
    Thank you.

    Hi
    If your settlement is triggered by a batch or is triggered by a workflow exit EXIT_SAPLKEAK_001 is not run. From release 5.00 on characteristic groups are indeed not considered any more during batch input processes because there were problems before with initial chars of a CO-PA line item resulting from a batch input process that actually shouldn't be initial.
    Refer SAP Note 581739, which put an end to usage of char groups during batch input processes. Also refer SAP Note 142628.
    Regards
    Sanil Bhandari
    Edited by: Sanil K Bhandari on Jun 23, 2011 10:12 AM

Maybe you are looking for

  • Family sharing and child's id

    i want to set up Apple id's for my children under family sharing.I only have a debit card which is used for my own I'd. Is it possible to use this for family sharing?

  • Javascript To Hide/Show Complete LOV Item On Page

    Hi All, I am trying to show/hide a page item which is a LOV page item type. I was using the $f_Hide_On_Value_Item which does not hide LOV image. What should I use to accomplish this ? It has to implemented in Javascript. Any help appreciated ... Tom

  • HR forms in ECC 5.0 and ECC 6.0

    Hi,     What are the pre-requisites and the configurations required for using HR forms? We are not able to activate the form and it gives an error of a layout file missing at the server.     Do we need to install certain softwares or files to use the

  • 11g Upgrade?

    Hi, I was curious can I upgrade from a 10.3.4 OBIEE environment to a new 11g environment and still be able to use the 10g implementation? Basically does the upgrade destroy the 10g version? Thanks in advance! Mike

  • Build XML with DOM

    Why does this loop works well if I COMMENT OUT the second node - but I get a NULL document if I try to add the second node ? //Loop through the result set for (int i=0; i < iRows; i++) { System.out.println(result.getString("SiteID")); Node newSiteIDN