Workaround for AW607

Hi expert,
Need your expertise on how to workaround the error in AW607.
We are in version 4.7, we have a WBS cost which is cumulated in 2010 (monthly settled to AUC in 2010). We now want to final settle it to GL in 2011 thus encounter error AW607 (settlement of old asset data to receiver type G/L not allowed). We know SAP advise is to switch the error into warning. But our company does not agree to that, so we try to work around it by reversing the cost in 2010 and transfer it to 2011 but the error is still there, in brief these is what we tried:
1. Reverse the cost in 2010 into balance sheet account in 2010
2. Rerun CJ88 of period 12.2010
3. Check AUC for 2010 is now zero
4. Post the cost in 2011
5. Run CJ88 for period 1.2011 (system gives us AW607)
Really appreciate for any suggestion how to workaround it. Thanks in advance for any reply.

The error being reported for the latest settlement indicates that old cost is being posted to G/L account in 01.2011. Based on your description it seems that cost needs to be posted to an asset. Kindly check the settlement rules and restrict the old rules (specially the one with reciever type G/L account) via the 'To period' and 'To year' field.
Also ensure if the correct processing type has been selected in CJ88.
Regards,
Ammar

Similar Messages

Extensions like Ghostery, WOT or AdBlock stop working after two or three times. Restarting the webpage in a new tab the extensions will work again for several times and then stop again. Has anybody an explanation or a workaround for this bug in Safari 5?

Extensions like Ghostery, WOT or AdBlock stop working after two or three times. Restarting the webpage in a new tab the extensions will work again for several times and then stop again. Has anybody an explanation or a workaround for this bug in Safari 5?

Remove the extensions, redownload Safari, reload the extensions.
http://www.apple.com/safari/download/
And if you really want a better experience, use Firefox, tons more choices and possibilities there.
Firefox's "NoScript" will block the Trojan going around on websites. Best web security you can get.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/noscript/
Ghostery, Ad Block Plus and thousands of add-ons more have originated on Firefox.

Workaround for JSFL shape selection bug?

There seems to be a bug in the document selection reporting in JSFL in CS4 (haven't tested earlier versions). I submitted it as a bug to Adobe but I'd really like to find a workaround for it. I've included my bug report below. Has anyone else encountered this? If so, have you figured out a workaround? It's pretty annoying, making the tool I'm working on really difficult to manage.
******BUG******
After performing a publish preview, fl.getDocumentDOM().selection reports an incorrect selection of raw shapes.
Steps to reproduce bug:
1. Create a JSFL command with the following contents:
doc = fl.getDocumentDOM();
fl.trace("there are " + doc.selection.length + " items selected");
2. Start the authoring environment fresh, with a new document.
3. Draw several shapes on the stage, not touching each other, all in the same frame and layer.
4. Select one of those shapes but leave the others unselected.
5. Run the previously created JSFL command. It will send the following text to the output panel, as one would expect:
"there are 1 items selected"
6. Do a publish preview (either Flash or HTML).
7. When it comes up, close the preview window.
8. Deselect all and then select one of the shapes (again, keeping the others unselected).
9. Run the JSFL command again. This time, it will say that there are n items selected (where n is the number of shapes you drew in step 3). So if you drew three shapes, it will print out the following:
there are 3 items selected
Note that this result will be the same even if you go to a different document, do a publish preview on that document, then return to the original. It seems that simply doing a publish preview alters Flash's state to report the selection incorrectly.
Results: The JSFL command reports that all the shapes are selected, despite the fact that only one of them is. The only way I've found to get Flash back to its normal behavior is to restart the authoring environment.
Expected results: In the steps above, the JSFL command should always print out that there is one element selected. There's no reason that doing a publish preview should change that.

When selected all shapes in selection are treated as one. You can see it if you run this script with selected multiple shapes:
fl.trace( fl.getDocumentDOM().selection[0].contours.length );
It will output you twise bigger number then selected shapes (because each Shape has two contours - one clockwise, other counterclockwise).
Of course this. implementation is strange for me too. Thats how i found your post

ITunes Match/iOS 7 iPhone music workaround for excessive data usage?

I just got an email from AT&T indicating I had exceeded 150GB of home data usage this month. It was because I used my home wifi to download 5000 songs to my iPhone from iTunes Match to fill it.
I'm frustrated, since it used to be so easy to make iTunes Match work for a large amount of music: In iOS 6 what I used to do (if I had to restore iPhone and set up as new phone): Plug iPhone 5 into computer, set up phone as new, check "manually manage music and videos" and "prefer 128kbps" and make sure iTunes Match was off in phone settings. Then drag & drop 5000 songs (about 40GB) from iTunes into phone. Once that was completed (a couple of hours), I could disconnect the iPhone from my Mac, turn iTunes Match to "on" in phone settings, and I'd get a message on the phone saying "All music on this device will be replaced" which is fine, but other than taking a while to update the remainder of my iCloud stored music, it used very little data.
Fast-forward to this past weekend. After updating to iOS 7.0.2 and having to do a restore and set up as new iPhone, this approach didn't work: When the step came "All music on this device will be replaced," all of the 5000 songs entirely re-downloaded all over again, which took 27 hours and burned through 40+ GB of home data (not phone data, since I was on Wifi). I kept my phone at home, plugged in and on wifi all weekend so as not to burn through all of my LTE data.
What is the deal? If I have to do this again (let's hope iOS 7.0.3 or 7.1 doesn't force my phone into recovery mode again), I certainly don't have the time or patience to let iTunes Match redownload all music again, and I certainly don't want to use up 40+ GB of home data.
Is there a workaround for this? Have others been successful transferring music via computer first and then turning on Match without problem in iOS 7.0.2? I'm sure it worked that way in iOS 6, and without completely redownloading all the music again, since that process would have taken several hours and a lot of home data, and I have not had any problems like this prior to iOS 7.

I think a better question is why do you "have to" restore your iPhone and set it up as a new device as often as you seem to? This seems to be more of a problem for you.
I followup question is why do you have iTunes Match turned on if you're syncing all your music to your iPhone?
Perhaps you should examine how you're using your iPhone and iTunes Match?
brsedu wrote:
Have others been successful transferring music via computer first and then turning on Match without problem in iOS 7.0.2? I'm sure it worked that way in iOS 6, and without completely redownloading all the music again, since that process would have taken several hours and a lot of home data, and I have not had any problems like this prior to iOS 7.
To answer this question, yes I have. It has always worked this way for me.

Workaround for not being able to reference a multi-select field in a calculated field?

Does anyone have a workaround for the fact that SP doesn't allow the use of a multi-select choice field to be used in a calculation in a calculated column? I have a list that WAS a single choice in a Status field with three other calculated columns
that were dependent upon that field. Then I had to change the Status field to be to multi-select (checkboxes). Now of course my calculated columns don't work. In addition, the end user can't fill them in either.
I've got a Status field (multi-select), a Status Date field and Expiration Date field (calc). The expiration date's calculation is shown below. This worked great until I was asked
to change the Status field to multi-select.<o:p></o:p>
=IF(Status="NoI
Review",DATE(YEAR([Status Date]),MONTH([Status Date]),DAY([Status
Date])+21),"")<o:p></o:p>
There are no mistakes; every result tells you something of value about what you are trying to accomplish.

Hi run4it,
Since SharePoint calculated column cannot reference the choice field with multiple-select value enabled, a workaround is to use workflow to copy the "Status" column value to another single line text column, then reference this single line text column in
calculated column.
Thanks,
Daniel Yang
Forum Support
If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected]
Daniel Yang
TechNet Community Support

Can someone help me find a workaround to get flash to work in XP Pro 64 bit, like there is a workaround for vista 64 bit?

Can someone help me find a workaround to get flash to work in XP Pro 64 bit, like there is a workaround for vista 64 bit?
I am trying to get rid of all my 32 bit apps because the more of them you run in 64 bit the less resources are available.
Firefox has a 64 bit browser they call the Shiretoko build. I love it, it's twice as fast as a heavily tweaked 32 bit firefox. Java has a 64 bit plugin that works with it.
The last holdout is Adobe.
Microsoft is making Vista and Win 7 64 bit as easy and smooth as the 32 bit versions as a means to get people to start using them.
Linux has a way to make flash work with 64 bit.
Remember when we all had a 16 bit operating system and how much better things got with 32 bit?
Adobe, it's time!.. don't you see that?
Can someone help me solve my problem? Please?

lostchild wrote:
sorry but that doesnt help my options the guy i called said they discontinued the audigy 4 and 2. I dont know why he would say that but he said his supplier cant get them. Are they really discontinued? Also, isnt the audigy 2 zs or whatever its called for notebooks? i cant use an external one. Well not that i cant, i dont want to. I just want a good sound card mounted into my computer...
Thanx in advance.
no the audigy 2 zs is pci based. they have another called audigy 2 zs notebook and that's the one for laptop. if you can't find it from your vendor, you can always try getting it from someone else.

Workarounds for lack of sub-folder support

I'm trying to find a workaround for the lack of sub-folder support for photos. For example, are there any apps that synchronise my photos with the original folder structure from my PC? I've spent quite a lot of time searching, but can't find the right solution.

Hi all. Hope this helps...
There is NO sub-folder (two or more folder levels) support in OS3x and OS4x until today. Hope this will change in near future, however that also means foregoing smoothness operation of the iDevice due to how the internal memory works inside (so far, thousands of photos can be viewed without a lag because how fast the iDevice can find the memory location of each file inside its big memory, and creating sub-folders will take great amount of time for the processor to find, put-together, and present the many photos to screen).
There are other applications that support photos with sub-folders (folders inside folders inside folders inside folders inside folders and so on), however these are not specialized photo viewing app and will not show picture thumbnails but file listing instead:
- GoodReader
- OPlayer
Two good photo and video viewing apps with privacy security; Photo Safe and Video Safe, are also available, which supports high-definition without reducing photo quality as in original iDevice, BUT does not support sub-folders (only one level folders/albums).
I was hoping iOS4 had the Sub-folders feature for its iPhoto... doesn't have to be three-folder levels, but just additional one level sub-folders would be great.
Cheers!

SSAS Tabular in DirectQuery - What are the workarounds for formula limitations?

Hello,
I need to create an SSAS Tabular model against the database of a live, real-time, line of business transactional system (i.e. a CRM).
The business requirement behind it is that we need to create some complex reports against live data, and our DW is only updated daily.
This live model will however be partitioned with a time-variance limitation (e.g. only records which are XX old can be returned).
Now here is the challenge. Since I am querying live data, then I believe the model must be configured in DirectQuery model. Am I right?
The issue is that DirectQuery mode is full of formula limitations. So my concern is, if I need a calculated column or measure that I cannot make it work due to DirectQuery limitations, then what are the alternatives?
Remember that the data source is from a live system, so it is not like I can create columns and measures in the underlying relational database.
Please advise.
Regards,
P.

Hi pmdci,
According to your description, you want to use some functions in calculated measure which are not supported in DirectQuery mode. Right?
In Analysis Services Tabular, since DirectQuery has the real time access and scalability, this comes with a price of restrictions on a number of DAX functions and missing Calculated Column feature. Generally the workaround for these scenarios
is replacing those functions with other functions which are supported in DirectQuery mode, or create columns in the data source. However, as you said, your environment is not possible to create columns in the database. And a lot of those limited
function are not replaceable, like time intelligence functions. So actually, there's no really effective workaround currently.
For you requirement, I suggest you submit Microsoft a feature request
at https://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer
so that we can try to modify and expand the product features based on your needs.
Best Regards,
Simon Hou
TechNet Community Support

Workaround for ORA-04030 error

hi,
we've encountered the following error:
ORA-04030: out of process memory when trying to allocate 296 bytes (callheap, koposal dvoid)
all of the research i've done points to setting up the database with a Very Large Memory configuration, which will be carried out at a later date as we're still in the development stage.
is there a possible workaround for this error?
thanks
santosh sewlal

hi,
we're inserting into tables - spatial data and images, from a C#.net application that sends data to the db in a BLOB

Workaround for Invalid Certificate with Acrobat 9.0 and Adobe Reader v.7.0?

Hello!
In Adobe Acrobat 9.0 Professional, is there currently a workaround for the following scenario?:
At our company, the source document is created in Word and then a PDF document is created using Adobe v.9.0. My colleague, who uses Adobe 9.0 Professional, places a certificate in the Header of the PDF document.
When this document goes out for sign off, the users only have Adobe Reader v. 7.0. Once these users open the PDF document and try to place their signature in to the digital signature fields, the certificate in the document becomes invalid.
Is there a way to save off the PDF in v.9 in different formats (A, F, etc.).
Would saving off the PDF in another format retain the validity of the certificate in the PDF document when other users with Reader v.7.0 try to sign the document?
Thx again for everyone's help!
Susan Steen

Hi Steve,
fwiw - at the Forums' entry http://forums.adobe.com/index.jspa
there is this announcement.
Announcement: File Attachments Temporarily Disabled
Hide Details
We have temporarily disabled the ability to upload files to the forums in order to protect our customers/users from a potential security issue. Thank you for your patience while we mitigate this issue.
by adobe-admin at Feb 22, 2010 12:20 PM
So a file attachment may not be an option (?).
Be well...

Workarounds for searching a text field in SQL Server 2000

Hi,
I have a need to search within a text field in SQL Server 2000. In the
limitations section it notes that this is not possible. Is there a
recommended workaround for this in terms of performance? I have no way
of knowing the length of the text field in advance, and this could be
fairly large. Also, the number of objects that could contain the text
can be fairly large as well.
Thanks in advance,
Khamsouk

Note that some databases (or Oracle, at least) provide alternatives to
LIKE '%foo%' that are more efficient for large text blocks, given that
you have the appropriate indexing plugins etc. etc.
To use one of those types of search operators, you'd have to put
together a custom extension.
-Fred
Fred Lucas <[email protected]> wrote:
I'm assuming that when you say 'a text field', you're referring to a
SQLServer TEXT field, as opposed to just any old field that contains
text.
Like I said, I'm by no means a SQLServer pro, but I just ran:
SELECT CLOBSTRINGX
FROM LOCATORTESTOBJECTX
WHERE CLOBSTRINGX LIKE '%o%';
and got back my test row with 'foo' in the CLOBSTRINGX column.
CLOBSTRINGX is a TEXT column.
So, it is possible that our stringContains() extension will just work.
But then again, maybe not. I'm guessing it will.
Give it a try and, if you get an error, post the generated SQL (turn on
SQL output by setting the com.solarmetric.kodo.Logger property to
'stdout') and the error that you get. Also, try executing the generated
SQL directly against your data store to see if it works there.
-Fred
Khamsouk Souvanlasy <[email protected]> wrote:
Basically I just want to use kodo's extended stringContains syntax on a
text field. Is this possible?
Khamsouk
Fred Lucas wrote:
I'm not intimitely familiar with SQLServer's text searching
capabilities, but I'm confident that you could create a query extension
that would do what you need it to do.
What is the SQL that you are trying to generate?
-Fred
Khamsouk Souvanlasy <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
I have a need to search within a text field in SQL Server 2000. In the
limitations section it notes that this is not possible. Is there a
recommended workaround for this in terms of performance? I have no way
of knowing the length of the text field in advance, and this could be
fairly large. Also, the number of objects that could contain the text
can be fairly large as well.
Thanks in advance,
Khamsouk
Fred Lucas
SolarMetric Inc.
202-595-2064 x1122
http://www.solarmetric.com

"Adobe has found a solution or workaround for the recent crash in Adobe Flash CC" ...not really.

Hi guys,
My Flash CC crashes all the time, it's always been doing it since when I started using it on CS4, and I've somewhat given up on this bug being fixed, it crashes at least 20-30 times every document I create. I'm using a Wacom Bamboo Fun Pen&Touch tablet and drawing a lot, I think the problem is that it can't handle this much drawing.
Anyways, it just crashed and for the first time after reopening I found this nice message from Flash:
"Adobe has found a solution or workaround for the recent crash in Adobe Flash CC.
Please click here for further details."
Excited, I clicked on it! At last, a solution! Amazing!
...but it just points to http://www.adobe.com/
... I don't understand.
What's happening? I'm genuinely puzzled.
Also, anybody else experiencing frequent crashes?
Thanks!
Ciao!

Yes, this is not good -- you're already mad when it crashes, then "We found a solution!" But, for me clicking on the link does nothing - no link even to adobe, just a tease - nothing opens.
It's bad enough crashing a couple times a day and losing work (I do save every chance I get), but then to get taunted with this bogus message, it's discouraging and exactly the best 'user experience' for a really expensive product from company that is all about helping professionals create good design/user experience ..
I like the way this is headed though! it just doesn't work right now.

I don't like itunes 10 and so I'm using itunes 9. However, now my phone can't connect to itunes because it says it requires itunes 10.5 or later. Is there a workaround for this?

I don't like itunes 10 and so I'm using itunes 9. However, now my phone can't connect to itunes because it says it requires itunes 10.5 or later. Is there a workaround for this?

No.
If you don't want to update to the supported software you can't use the device.

10.2 crashes when I try to convert old libraries for use in the new software. Is there a workaround for this? Or will i have to continue using the previous version to complete older projects?

Final Cut Pro X 10.2 crashes when I try to convert old libraries for use in the new software. Is there a workaround for this? Or will I have to continue using the previous version to complete older projects? the only foreseeable solution is to begin any new projects on 10.2 or importing footage on 10.2 and starting form scratch--which is something i definitely don't want to do or have time to do. ANY advice, thoughts, or opinions would be greatly appreciated! Thank you!
Running 10.10.3 // MacBook Pro (Retina, 15-inch, Early 2013) // 2.4 GHz Intel Core i7 // 8 GB 1600 MHz DDR3

Exactly the same problem with me.
Some other threads advice to remove fonts, clean the caches, remove add ins but nothing works consistenty, for some it looks like it works, for me it failed.
What I did not try yet, was to move the Render files out of the malicious library to trash.

How can I backup my iphone 4 using iTunes 9.1.1? Is there a workaround for this?

How can I backup my iphone 4 using iTunes 9.1.1? Is there a workaround for this? I need to backup my phone for replacement but it tells me I need 10.1 or later. All software is up to date, Operating system is 10.4.11. Thanks!

No sorry. You need to upgrade to v10.5 Leopard (minimum) in order to sync an iPhone 4.
iPhone minimum requirements:
Mac computer with USB 2.0 port
Mac OS X v10.5.8 or later
iTunes 10.1 or later
iTunes Store account
Internet access
You can upgrade to Leopard if your Mac meets v10.5 requirements.
Requirements for Mac OS X v10.5
If your Mac is Intel, you can upgrade directly to Snow Leopard if your Mac meets 10.6 Snow Leopard - Technical Specifications

Workaround for AW607

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for