Workflow Approvals issue

I'm creating an access request form using a SharePoint list. The following is what I am trying to do:
User:
ID:
Environment:
Justification:
User Submits Form --> Routes to approver based on Environment --> If Approved --> Creates task to group for user setup
* OR *
User Submits Form --> Routes to approver based on Environment --> If Rejected --> Ends
Issue I'm having: If I put in "Stop the workflow and log REJECTED" in the "Change Behavior of a single task" the workflow ends, no "User Setup Task" is created BUT the task and workflow status stays in Pending Approval.
If I do not put this in, the task closes as rejected, but it still creates the User Setup Task.
Any help is appreciated!

Hi mgreerzy,
How many approvers did you have?
For troubleshooting your issue better, I suggest you provide your workflow special for "Creates task ti group for user setup" and "Stop the workflow and log REJECTED". It will make others easy to find a solution for you.
Best Regards,
Wendy
Wendy Li
TechNet Community Support

Similar Messages

  • Archival and Purge for Workflow Approvals

    I am looking for a way to archive at least 10 years worth of Workflow Approvals for Oracle R12 EBS Financials environment. I cannot find any good notes on My Oracle Support or whitepapers other than a basic paper on general archival and purge programs for Oracle R12 EBS. Any tips on how to setup an archival process for Oracle R12 EBS Workflow approvals would be appreciated.
    Thanks
    Ben

    1. SHould have automatic schedules that run to purge/archivePlease see this link -- https://forums.oracle.com/forums/search.jspa?threadID=&q=data+AND+archival+AND+tool&objID=c3&dateRange=all&userID=&numResults=15&rankBy=10001
    2. Keep log of data that is archived/PurgedPlease see this link -- https://forums.oracle.com/forums/search.jspa?threadID=&q=data+AND+archival&objID=c3&dateRange=all&userID=&numResults=15&rankBy=10001
    Thanks,
    Hussein

  • SCRM Workflow + sourcing approvals issues

    Hello,
    I am testing the SCRM workflow set up and I'd like to be clarified on the following issue:
    when I need to add a user/group to the owner section for example, the system allows me to put author + another user.
    I assume "author" would be the creator of the workflow (myself), so how is it possible to set up another user = author as owner of the workflow?
    Also, what is the impact of the "optional" field to be ticked? would you please give me some examples?
    Finally, when creating a sourcing approval I'd need to fill in the supplier item field and flag the supplier signed spec.
    I assume the supplier item would be the crossed reference supplier number in another system. Am I right?
    When should I tick the supplier signed spec instead? when would it be necessary? Would you please give me a few example to better understand the need for the supplier to sign a sourcing approval?
    Thanks and regards
    Daniele

    "when I need to add a user/group to the owner section for example, the system allows me to put author + another user.
    I assume "author" would be the creator of the workflow (myself), so how is it possible to set up another user = author as owner of the workflow?"
    The "Author" token represents the originator of the Sourcing Approval or GSM specification. To set other users up as owners you need to add them to the owners grid in the step. The first step and terminating step don't have the owner grid option. The Administrators User Guide discusses this further on page 7-10
    "Also, what is the impact of the "optional" field to be ticked? would you please give me some examples?"
    You can make it optional for the end user to select an owner, notification recipient or signature requestee. This means the end user when workflowing the object could choose not to select one of these. If the selection was not marked optional then the user would be told that they are required to select something before continuing. For example, if you wanted all members of the Labeling group to be notified you wouldn't make that an optional selection for the end user workflowing the sourcing approval or specification. If you allow the end user to decide when and who needs to be notified you would make that selection optional.
    "Finally, when creating a sourcing approval I'd need to fill in the supplier item field and flag the supplier signed spec.
    I assume the supplier item would be the crossed reference supplier number in another system. Am I right?"
    It could be and you could manually fill out the cross reference related to that supplier in the supplier item # field.
    This could also be a temporary number that you are using for the supplier's material until it is an approved/purchased material with an assigned cross reference.
    "When should I tick the supplier signed spec instead? when would it be necessary? Would you please give me a few example to better understand the need for the supplier to sign a sourcing approval?"
    Supplier Signed Spec means that the supplier literally signed off on the specification and agrees to supplier what the specification dictates. It allows you to say they signed off, what date they signed off on the spec and any other comments that are necessary around that approval. There is another feature you can use to automate this sign off. You can send the specification to a supplier, have them review it, then they can approve or reject suppling the material as the specification dictates. This interaction is captured on the sourcing approval. When they approve the spec the supplier signed box is checked, the date is captured and their comments are also recorded. You can learn more about this feature in a white paper hosted with the product documentation. Its "Supplier Approval of Specifications Whitepaper" You can find it in the white paper section of http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/documentation/agile-085940.html#plmprocess

  • SharePoint foundation 2010 workflow performance issue

    I need clarification for the below issue.
    I have designed state machine approval workflow through VS2010.
    It was worked fine for 3 months and now it is taking long time for each level of execution.
    I have checked the running workflow instances in site, it is around 1800 instances for each sub site.
    Application: SharePoint Foundation 2010                                                                              
    Farm configuration
    Web server
    Application Server
    Database Server
    Processor
    Intel® Xeon® CPU E5-26670 0 @2.90GHz 2.89GHz
    Intel® Xeon® CPU E5-26670 0 @2.90GHz 2.89GHz
    Intel® Xeon® CPU E5-26670 0 @2.90GHz 2.89GHz
    RAM
    8 GB
    8 GB
    14 GB
    OS
    Windows Server 2008 R2 SP 1
    Windows Server 2008 R2 SP 1
    Windows Server 2008 R2 SP 1
    Anandhan.S Remember to 'mark or propose as answer' or 'vote as helpful' as appropriate.

    I have done the below configuration in production servers. Still the problem exists.
    System took around 13 hours+ to proceed to next approver. Suggest some ideas to increase workflow performance.
    Decreased DB server memory configuration
    (Database server)
    Maximum memory in SQL server reduced from
    10GB to 8GB.
    Increased Workflow throttle configurations
    (Application & Web server)
    PS C:\Windows\system32> stsadm -o getproperty -pn
    workflow-eventdelivery-throttle <Property Exist="Yes" Value="150" />
    (Default value is 15)
    PS C:\Windows\system32> stsadm -o getproperty -pn
    workitem-eventdelivery-batchsize <Property Exist="Yes" Value="150" />
    (Default value is 100)
    PS C:\Windows\system32> stsadm -o getproperty -pn
    workflow-eventdelivery-timeout <Property Exist="Yes" Value="10" />
    (Default value is 5)
    PS C:\Windows\system32> stsadm -o getproperty -pn
    job-workflow -url http://myweb:1333 <Property Exist="Yes" Value="Every 10 minutes between 0 and 30" />
    (Default - Property Exists = “No”)
    Site collection analytics
    Sub-Site1: Total running workflow instances: 302
    Sub-Site 2: Total running workflow instances: 58
    Sub-Site 3: Total running workflow instances: 1234
    Sub-Site 4: Total running workflow instances: 2
    Sub-Site 5: Total running workflow instances: 2306
    Sub-Site 6: Total running workflow instances: 512
    Sub-Site 7: Total running workflow instances: 1631
    Sub-Site 8: Total running workflow instances: 7
    Sub-Site 9: Total running workflow instances: 38
    Sum of workflow instances from all sites:
    6090….
    Farm configuration
    Web server
    Application Server
    Database Server
    Processor
    Intel® Xeon® CPU E5-26670 0 @2.90GHz 2.89GHz
    Intel® Xeon® CPU E5-26670 0 @2.90GHz 2.89GHz
    Intel® Xeon® CPU E5-26670 0 @2.90GHz 2.89GHz
    RAM
    8 GB
    8 GB
    14 GB
    OS
    Windows Server 2008 R2 SP 1
    Windows Server 2008 R2 SP 1
    Windows Server 2008 R2 SP 1
    Anandhan.S Remember to 'mark or propose as answer' or 'vote as helpful' as appropriate.

  • Sharepoint designer 2013 workflow kickoff issue from code

    Problem Statement: Start a  SharePoint 2013 designer Reusable Workflow with STS Authenticated User. We are trying to start to SharePoint 2013 designer Reusable Workflow with
    STS authenticated user using code but when we do that, we get following error. RequestorId: a3ce6dc6-31ec-23f3-0000-000000000000. Details: RequestorId: a3ce6dc6-31ec-23f3-0000-000000000000. Details: An unhandled exception occurred during the
    execution of the workflow instance. Exception details: System.ApplicationException: HTTP 401 {"error_description":"The server was unable to process the request due to an internal error. For more information about the error, either turn on IncludeExceptionDetailInFaults
    (either from ServiceBehaviorAttribute or from the <serviceDebug> configuration behavior) on the server in order to send the exception information back to the client, or turn on tracing as per the Microsoft .NET Framework SDK documentation and inspect
    the server trace logs."} {"x-ms-diagnostics":["3001000;reason=\"There has been an error authenticating the request.\";category=\"invalid_client\""],"SPRequestGuid":["a3ce6dc6-31ec-23f3-b3ab-aef56fc7e299"],"request-id":["a3ce6dc6-31ec-23f3-b3ab-aef56fc7e299"],"X-FRAME-OPTIONS":["SAMEORIGIN"],"SPRequestDuration":["65"],"SPIisLatency":["0"],"Server":["Microsoft-IIS\/8.0"],"WWW-Authenticate":["Bearer
    realm=\"de9da885-f7bf-4564-a3a5-
    Alternate approach we are following : We have created a windows authenticated user and gave him all the necessary permission to trigger the workflow(contribute, full control). Then we are creating the User token
    for that user and opening the site with the help of the generated user token. By this approach workflow is getting triggered.
    The problem in this approach is after ¾ days it gives error when trying to kick off workflow from code with user who has not logged in as we are using this AD user only for kickoff purpose.
    InvalidOperationException:
    Operation is not valid due to the current state of the object
    MCTS Sharepoint 2010, MCAD dotnet, MCPDEA, SharePoint Lead

    There is a userprofile for the user and the issue is not a userprofile. We are using direct AD import and we have full sync every 5 minutes. The workflow gets kicked off using a fix user who never logs in but after 4/5 days the token or something gets expired
    and then we have to manually login with that user and then only code can kickoff workflow with that particular user.
    The problem in this approach is after ¾ days it gives error when trying to kick off workflow from code with user who has not logged in as we are using this AD user only for kickoff purpose.
    InvalidOperationException:
    Operation is not valid due to the current state of the object
    We can not kickoff with current user as current user can not be given contribute rights and we can not do it with system account as its not able to kickoff using system account by design of sp2013 workflow.
    So we need to know how to kcikoff workflow with a user who never logs in or logs in only for the first time and then never in production.
    Below code works for few days and then as user does not login with which we kick off workflow the token or something gets expired after 4/5 days.
    userToken = oSPWeb.EnsureUser(“UserAccountName”).UserToken;
    using (SPSite
    oSPSite = new
    SPSite(SPContext.Current.Web.Url,
    userToken))  //Site collection URL
    using (SPWeb
    oSPWeb = oSPSite.OpenWeb())  //Subsite URL
    SPList list = oSPWeb.Lists["Proposal"];
    try
                                oSPWeb.AllowUnsafeUpdates =
    true;
    SPListItem item = list.GetItemById(proposalID);
    var workflowServiceManager =
    new
    WorkflowServicesManager(oSPWeb);
    var workflowSubscriptionService = workflowServiceManager.GetWorkflowSubscriptionService();
                                //get
    all workflows associated with the list
    var subscriptions = workflowSubscriptionService.EnumerateSubscriptionsByList(list.ID);
    foreach (var
    workflowSubscription in subscriptions)
    if (workflowSubscription.Name ==
    "Proposal Workflow")
    //initiation parameters
    var inputParameters =
    new
    Dictionary<string,
    object>();
    inputParameters.Add("Comments",
    "TEST");
    inputParameters.Add("ItemId", item.ID);
    inputParameters.Add("WorkflowStart",
    "StartWorkflow");
    workflowServiceManager.GetWorkflowInstanceService().StartWorkflowOnListItem(workflowSubscription, item.ID, inputParameters);
    break;
                                oSPWeb.AllowUnsafeUpdates =
    false;
    catch (Exception
    ex)
                                Classes.Logger.WriteErrorLog("Sumbit",
    "kickoffWorkflow1", ex,
    MCTS Sharepoint 2010, MCAD dotnet, MCPDEA, SharePoint Lead

  • Workflow Susspend Issue

    Hi All,
    I am facing an issue with SP2013 Custom Workflow developed using Visual Studio 2012.
    Objective of the Custom workflow: User fills the form and submit, list get updated and workflow will initiate and go for the process.
    Issue: After the deployment of WF, for first time when user is filling the form and submit, list is getting updated. But the Workflow Goes to "Suspend" mode. (
    This Custom Workflow has a configuration file where we are providing other details including ID of Impersonator (farm is running under Claim Based Authentication).
    Work flow works fine once when the Impersonator initiate the workflow (Fill the form and submit for approval) and everything works fine after that.
    Following steps are already performed
    1.Make sure User profile synchronization is started.
    2.Make sure the user is not the SharePoint system user.
    3.Make sure the user by whom you are logged is available in User Profile list.
    4.Step full synchronization of User Profile Application.
    From the ULS logs it seems the user's security token from the STS service and User profile service is not being issued.
    Appreciate any thoughts or solution.
    Following are the log files.
    <-------------------------------Information taken from "http://YYYY.XXXXX.com/sites/xxxx/_layouts/15/wrkstat.aspx" where it is showing workflow status as "Suspend"------->
    http://yyyy.XXXX.com/sites/xxxx/_vti_bin/client.svc/sp.utilities.utility.ResolvePrincipalInCurrentcontext(input=@ParamUser,scopes='15',sources='15',inputIsEmailOnly='false',addToUserInfoList='False')?%40ParamUser='i%3A0%23.w%7CXXXXX%5Csps_biscomdev'
    Correlation Id: f5bd8793-a53c-2127-bfb1-70bc172425e8 Instance Id: 14a985a0-60c8-42db-a42c-c752190b8106
    RequestorId: f5bd8793-a53c-2127-0000-000000000000. Details: RequestorId: f5bd8793-a53c-2127-0000-000000000000. Details: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the workflow instance. Exception details: System.ApplicationException: HTTP 401
    {"error_description":"The server was unable to process the request due to an internal error. For more information about the error, either turn on IncludeExceptionDetailInFaults (either from ServiceBehaviorAttribute or from the <serviceDebug>
    configuration behavior) on the server in order to send the exception information back to the client, or turn on tracing as per the Microsoft .NET Framework SDK documentation and inspect the server trace logs."} {"x-ms-diagnostics":["3001000;reason=\"There
    has been an error authenticating the request.\";category=\"invalid_client\""],"SPRequestGuid":["f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8654-672758a68234"],"request-id":["f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8654-672758a68234"],"X-FRAME-OPTIONS":["SAMEORIGIN"],"SPRequestDuration":["34"],"SPIisLatency":["0"],"Server":["Microsoft-IIS\/7.5"],"WWW-Authenticate":["Bearer
    realm=\"b14e1e0f-257f-42ec-a92d-377479e0ec8d\",client_id=\"00000003-0000-0ff1-ce00-000000000000\",trusted_issuers=\"00000005-0000-0000-c000-000000000000@*,[email protected]79e0ec8d\"","NTLM"],"X-Powered-By":["ASP.NET"],"MicrosoftSharePointTeamServices":["15.0.0.4420"],"X-Content-Type-Options":["nosniff"],"X-MS-InvokeApp":["1;
    RequireReadOnly"],"Date":["Fri, 10 Apr 2015 19:48:07 GMT"]} at Microsoft.Activities.Hosting.Runtime.Subroutine.SubroutineChild.Execute(CodeActivityContext context) at System.Activities.CodeActivity.InternalExecute(ActivityInstance
    instance, ActivityExecutor executor, BookmarkManager bookmarkManager) at System.Activities.Runtime.ActivityExecutor.ExecuteActivityWorkItem.ExecuteBody(ActivityExecutor executor, BookmarkManager bookmarkManager, Location resultLocation)
    <----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
    <-----------------------ULS Log--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
    04/16/2015 15:49:10.51 OWSTIMER.EXE (0x3B3C) 0x39A4 SharePoint Server Search Administration aij4q Medium SystemMetricsTraceAggregator error getting next value System.ComponentModel.Win32Exception (0x80004005): Unknown error
    (0xc0000bc6)     at Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Performance.Pdh.CheckReturnValue(PDH_STATUS status, Boolean throwOnError)     at Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Performance.PerformanceCounter.NextValue(Int32 retry,
    Int32 retryInterval, Boolean initialize)     at Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Monitoring.SystemMetricsTraceAggregator.Flush(ILoggingProvider persist) 3f5ffd9c-1ea7-d0c8-efd5-08730af690a1
    04/16/2015 15:49:10.95 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x20CC SharePoint Server Workflow Services aj526 Medium WorkflowMessagingClient is using MSMQ 3f5ffd9c-fec7-d0c8-efd5-089b983d7c28
    04/16/2015 15:49:14.11 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1E74 SharePoint Portal Server User Profiles aj2aw High [Forced due to logging gap, Original Level: Verbose] GetPartitionPropertiesCache :: ApplicationId = {0} 405ffd9c-ae9d-d0c8-efd5-045b09583aac
    04/16/2015 15:49:15.43 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x2AA4 SharePoint Portal Server User Profiles ae0s1 High Identity claims mapped to '0' user profiles. Claims: [nameid: '', nii: 'windows', upn: '', smtp: '', sip: ''], User Profiles: f5bd8793-a53c-2127-a845-3695a6bf9678
    04/16/2015 15:49:15.45 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x2AA4 SharePoint Portal Server User Profiles ae0sr Unexpected UserProfileException caught.. Exception Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileNoUserFoundException: 3001002;reason=The
    incoming identity is not mapped to any user profile account in SharePoint. Possible cause is that no user profiles are created in user profile database. Contact your administrator.     at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.GetSingleUserProfileFromClaimsList(UserProfileManager
    upManager, IEnumerable`1 identityClaims)     at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.<>c__DisplayClass2.<GetMappedIdentityClaim>b__0() is thrown. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-a845-3695a6bf9678
    04/16/2015 15:49:15.45 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x2AA4 SharePoint Portal Server User Profiles ae0su High The set of claims could not be mapped to a single user identity. Exception 3001002;reason=The incoming identity is not mapped
    to any user profile account in SharePoint. Possible cause is that no user profiles are created in user profile database. Contact your administrator. has occured.  f5bd8793-a53c-2127-a845-3695a6bf9678
    04/16/2015 15:49:15.46 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1E74 SharePoint Server Search Query dn4s High FetchDataFromURL start at(outside if): 1 param: start 405ffd9c-ae9d-d0c8-efd5-045b09583aac
    04/16/2015 15:49:15.56 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x0518 SharePoint Portal Server User Profiles ae0s1 High Identity claims mapped to '0' user profiles. Claims: [nameid: '', nii: 'windows', upn: '', smtp: '', sip: ''], User
    Profiles: f5bd8793-a53c-2127-94b8-bfec2dd819f1
    04/16/2015 15:49:15.56 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x0518 SharePoint Portal Server User
    Profiles ae0sr Unexpected UserProfileException caught.. Exception Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileNoUserFoundException: 3001002;reason=The incoming identity is not mapped to any user profile account in SharePoint. Possible
    cause is that no user profiles are created in user profile database. Contact your administrator.     at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.GetSingleUserProfileFromClaimsList(UserProfileManager upManager,
    IEnumerable`1 identityClaims)     at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.<>c__DisplayClass2.<GetMappedIdentityClaim>b__0() is thrown. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-94b8-bfec2dd819f1
    04/16/2015 15:49:15.56 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x0518 SharePoint Portal Server User Profiles ae0su High The set of claims could not be mapped to a single user identity. Exception 3001002;reason=The incoming identity is not mapped
    to any user profile account in SharePoint. Possible cause is that no user profiles are created in user profile database. Contact your administrator. has occured.  f5bd8793-a53c-2127-94b8-bfec2dd819f1
    04/16/2015 15:49:17.68 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Server Search Query dn4s High FetchDataFromURL start at(outside if): 1 param: start 415ffd9c-fe81-d0c8-efd5-069f50839f81
    04/16/2015 15:49:18.05 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x2554 SharePoint Server Search Query dn4s High FetchDataFromURL start at(outside if): 1 param: start 415ffd9c-7e98-d0c8-efd5-036cbbbe1377
    04/16/2015 15:49:19.99 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x3BBC SharePoint Server Search Query dn4s High FetchDataFromURL start at(outside if): 1 param: start 425ffd9c-8e0d-d0c8-efd5-0dc40744b558
    Regards
    Sakti

    I have the same problem, so i resolve it like :
    1. The user that launch the Workflow instance, is not exist in the profile DataBase.
    2. Connect with this user.
    3. Navigate to Profile Site of this user.
    4. Retry to retake to instance.
    5. You can also verify the Debug table of Workflow Databases, its contains all log errors

  • Workflow Notification Issue r12

    Hi
    I have two issues with Workflow notification in r12.
    1. Users get notification with a file attached called notification.html. This is not required. How can I stop workflow attaching this file when sending emails.
    2. How can I unanimously change notification preferences for all users?
    Thanks,

    what is the notification preference value of the recipient.
    If you don't want the 'notification.html' attachment in email, then set the user notification preference value as 'HTML mail' (MAILHTM2) .
    From UI
    Follow the naviagation
    user login --> Preferences tab--->Email Style -> 'HTML mail'
    In the wf_local_roles it should appear as 'MAILHTM2'.
    2. For FND user you can call the below API
    fnd_preference.put(username,'WF','MAILTYPE','MAILHTML');
    For other users you can directly update wf_local_roles with the required notification preference value

  • SharePoint Designer Workflow 2013 Issue

    Hi All,
    We have an issue with the SharePoint designer workflow with the below error message.
    "Something went wrong. To Try again, reload the page and then start the workflow"
    suggest...
    Arun Prakash

    Hi,
    According to your description, my understanding is that you got an error when you create a SharePoint Designer workflow.
    Please do an IISRESET.
    Whether the issue occurs at another site or site collection, do a test in another site or site collection, compare the results.
    If the results is same,  please uninstall Workflow Mananger from all servers, then reinstall it .
    Note : If you are on a multi-server environment, make sure you have installed Workflow Manager client on all of your farm servers.
    Here are some useful posts for you to take a look at:
    http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/forums/en-us/ad882c89-22db-4d6c-8f60-5761c5f0b0a8/problem-with-sharepoint-2013-workflows
    http://lennytech.wordpress.com/2013/06/02/configuring-sharepoint-2013-to-use-workflow-manager-1-0/
    if this issue still exists, please check the log file to find more information about this issue.
    Best regards,
    Lisa Chen

  • Indesign XML-IN workflow - Anchoring issues

    Hi all,
    We are using Indesign CS5.5 and CS6.
    For XML-IN workflow, we have developed a in-house tool for automation.
    Marginal Notes: Using Script we drag the content from the XML tree and anchor it in Margin as per layout.
    The issue here: In Pagination if they release the anchor the marginal content become Non-XML and wiped out from the XML tree.
    Is there is any work-around to handle these types of issues.
    Please advice.
    Shaji

    Hello Shaji.
    As far as i know there is no solution for this. I'we been struggling with it for a while now. The only "workaround" i found was to use copy-paste instead of releasing the anchor:
    Select the anchored frame, copy it, paste it in place, then remove the old anchor. It should create a new Story element in the XML tree. 
    It's not hard to script, if all you need is to release all anchors from the document/story, for example

  • E recruitment Approval workflow - Inbox issue

    Hi Experts,
    Im working in a  E recruitment module. So we have two systems one is HR system and Second one is E recruitment system. When ever the Candidate requested for the job, the candidate will be processed in E recruitment system and if the candidate is eligible for the job, then he will be hired using HR System.
    My issue is, I have one Approval workflow in the E recruitment module. I get the Approver details from HR System and sending the work item to the Approver's inbox. that is fine.
    But the problem is, E recruitment has separate inbox and the HR System has the separate inbox for the same person. Now the work item reaching the E recruitment inbox. But it should reach the HR system inbox.
    How the approval based workflow's working in E-recruitment module? Is any web service based approval tasks needs to be created or We can use the user decision task to get the approval?
    Please give your valuable suggestions.
    Helps will be highly appreciated.
    Thanks.

    Hi Nandini
      If both E-rec and HR system are connected together in landscape. As soon as job rec wf trigger from E-rec system based the logic to determine the approver to get the approver user id. After getting the user id you need to check wheather the approver belongs to which system ie E-rec to HR this can be get by using standard FM passing the userid to the FM it will give the result in which system the user id exist. After that you need the send that work item to the approver. Before sending the work item you need to find all the details in the background method of the workflow. There are standard FM to get the details of the system user id and in which system the user belongs to.
    If you have any help let me know.
    Regards
    Vijay

  • Workflow Administrator issue

    Hi,
    ebs 11.5.8
    We successfully cloned from prod to dev. DEV been up for ~1 month.
    We now have an issue with the Workflow.
    I log in as sysadmin -> system administrator responsibility then workflow -> Global Preferences
    In the html page that opens it says "Only the Workflow Administrators can edit Default settings."
    I tried with Workflow Administrator -> Global Preferences but same results.
    I check for profile (System Administrator -> Profile -> System : %workflow%) but found nothing that would indicate who is the admin of the workflow.
    I think this is due to autoconfig, setting the default value for the workflow administrator.
    How can I find who is the owner and change it?
    Thank you~
    Edited by: Nayas on Oct 27, 2010 2:03 PM

    Hi,
    I log in as sysadmin -> system administrator responsibility then workflow -> Global Preferences
    In the html page that opens it says "Only the Workflow Administrators can edit Default settings."Please see (Unable To Login As Workflow Administrator As Sysadmin [ID 396821.1]).
    How can I find who is the owner and change it?Please see (How To Reset Workflow Administrator [ID 413711.1]).
    Thanks,
    Hussein

  • Refresh workflow item issue after task processing

    Hi expert,
    We have a urgent client issue regarding work item in SAP inbox. I am new in workflow process.
    He has 142 work item in his inbox for invoce processing. But he has processed 70 from them. After processing these 70 invoices, all processed workitem should be gone from his workitem list. But some of wotkitem which has been processed, are still there in his inbox after refreshing inbox. I have check standard task TS30001128 has been used in workitem.
    Please sggest.
    Also How we can find workflow from TS30001128. Each work item has a workflow id. How we can check it?
    Regards
    Anutosh

    Hello,
    To find where a task is used, go to e.g. PFTC_DIS, fill in Standard Task and the task number, click Display, then click on where-used.
    For this case, I would look at the user's inbox in SWI5 and then click on the list of workitems to see the workflow log. It should tell you why the workitem is coming back (if he really did refresh).
    regards
    Rick Bakker
    hanabi technology

  • Vendor Confirmation workflow ( TS00008075 ) issue for IDOCs in Error ( 51 )

    Hi All,
              When IDOCs (Basic type: ORDERS02, Message type : ORDRSP ) goes in error with status 51 & comes to SAP system it calls event  u2018INPUTERROROCCURREDu2019  which is correct but it creates problem when it get re processed as it triggers event u2018INPUTSUCCESSu2019 resulting in firing vendor confirmation workflows to respective user ( this batch job re process each ORDRSP IDOC twice a day & hence 2 workflows per IDOC in error to clientu2019s inbox by triggering event u2018INPUTSUCCESSu2019).
    Could you please tell me why these IDOCs are triggering event u2018INPUTSUCCESSu2019 in case of error ( status 51 ) when they get RE PROCESSED. These kind of Idocs must only trigger u2018INPUTERROROCCURREDu2019  once  and should not create anything when these get reprocessed. Please note that these issues arise after EHP4 upgrade. Please let me know if any setting is there for triggering Vendor COnfirmation workflow ( TS00008075 ) when IDOCs in error get re processed.
    Please help us , thanks.
    Regards,
    Kartikey Rawat.

    Hello Kartikey Rawat !
                        INPUTSUCCESS  event gets fired just because it is configured as terminating event in the task.
                        If you don't want this event to get fired, either you can deactivate it  or delete the bindings related to the event  INPUTSUCCESS(doing so should not affect other two terminating events that may be required for you scenario) .
                        If you want know why it is fired, you can get to know in debug mode or check whether the event is defined through  related function modules configured in WE57,BD51,WE42 AND WE20 transaction codes.
                        In WE05 or WE02 transactions, you will get error description.Based on it too, you can figure out the reason.
    Regards,
    S.Suresh

  • TRIP Workflow approval issue

    Dear All
    We have developed custom workflow for TRIP workflow, with single level approval of line manager.
    We are raising Trip request using Transaction PR05.Workitem goes to line manager for approval in SAP inbox and
    NWBC (SAP netweaver ) for approval.On approval by manager workflow is completed instead of further processing.
    Reason for completion of workflow is Event BUS2089 CHANGE is created with event APPROVED.
    Due to this CHANGE event current workflow instance is completed,as parallely condition for CHANGE is checked for workflow completion.
    Kindly let us now this unexpected behavior of CHANGE event creation of BUS2089 on approval of trip by manager and any
    steps to control this.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Aditya

    Hi Aditya
    You may want to retain CHANGED event wait step so that if the trip is changed outside the WF, the current instance, being redundant, gets completed.
    For your case there can be two different approaches, depending how you have implemented the workflow.
    1) Check who is the user triggering the event CHANGED in this case. Is the system catching the manager user name or the user name WF-BATCH. If it is WF-BATCH, it becomes fairly simple. You do not complete the workflow after WAIT for EVENt step, instead loop back to wait step for any possible changes later on (outside the WF)....you will get the user name in the event (_EVT_CREATOR)
    2) If the username is that of the Approver, see if this works for you (Iam assuming that your approval is in one branch of the fork and the wait for event is in another branch of the fork (1 of 2 fork)).
    a) Trap the Actual Agent of the decision in the approval branch
    b) Trap the user triggering the COMPLETED event in the other branch
    c) Compare the two - if they are same, do not execute the process control step to complete the WF instead loop back to wait step for any possible changes later on (outside the WF).
    Not sure if this will work because there can be timing issues.....the Actual Agent of approval may not be written in one branch and the comparison happens in the other..... it's worth a try
    Regards,
    Modak

  • Sap workflow tutorial issue

    Hi,
    Looks like someone else has had the same issue recently (see Work flow in error when executed with a user decision.)
    but that question was marked as answered so am reposting my response here...
    Hi,
    I believe the orginal poster is following the workflow tutorial in the sap help.
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/fb/135962457311d189440000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
    I'm following the instructions and pretty sure it's been followed exactly on each step but am hitting the same issue - see 'Unit 10 - third step'.
    The log is reporting two errors
    Work item 000000014093: Object FLOWITEM method EXECUTE cannot be executed
    and
    Error when processing node '0000000039' (ParForEach index 000000)
    You reject the notification and then the work flow errors. Is the tutorial missing out a step or two or am I missing something?
    Can anyone help?

    After a bit of trial and error, it seems creating the decision task is a necessary step, though not explicitly stated.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Sound Card Trouble After -Syu

    Hello, I'm really not sure what I've done, but my sound is no longer working, and alsamixer does not detect my sound card anymore. I upgraded to kernel26 2.6.30.5-1 earlier today and so I suppose that could be to blame. I rebooted into the fallback k

  • Price in Service Plan

    Hi , How to maintain and Determine the price in Service Plan (Contract dependent). I have used an item category SPLA,and service plan product. Maintained the price in product conditions tab. But in Contract line item, there is no Conditions tab and a

  • Database recovery in Inconsistent mode

    Hi, We have mirroring at 24:00 on one of the mount point in Solaris which copy all oracle datafiles,redo files and control files and create a replica of all these files in a separate folder. But my database is running in NOARCHIVELOG mode.I am assumi

  • Netctl and bespoke ifplugd actions best practice

    Hi, Before the switch to netctl/systemd I used ifplugd to perform actions on ethernet up/down events. I'm now using netctl-ifplugd to automatically configure my ethernet interface and wonder how best to add my own actions. I apparently cannot run ifp

  • Reg external Summary tables

    Hi I am using Disc Release 4.1 I have registered a external summary in the Discoverer admin addition against my folders. My database version is higher than 8.1.6. I made sure that The options "Available for queries" = Yes "when do u want to use summa