Workflow doesn't determine WBS owner for SC with Combination of CC & WBS

Dear Friends,
We had an issue in SRM 7.0 workflow that workflow is not determining Project Manager as approver for the SC created with combination of cost center and WBS element, instead Worklfow is triggering to CC Manager for WBS line item. If SC created with single item with WBS element then it is fine. The workflow problem comes when the SC created with combination of CC & WBS only.
Can anobody throw some light on the issue.
Regards,
Kumar

Hi
Check if workflow is at all getting activated for this SC using SWI6.
If you are using Process controlled workflow, check SLG1 logs for evaluations of your bRF expressions whether the schema and process level are getting activated or not....
One more thing, check whether Object Type LInkage is active or not in SWE2
Virender Singh

Similar Messages

Why Apple doesn't provide .jpg-files for photos with date and our like Blackberry and Samsung?

why Apple doesn't provide .jpg-files for photos with date and our like Blackberry and Samsung?
I have to save photos (for medical use) on my pc and this suffix would be useful to identify them quicker.
Thanks

http://www.learn.usa.canon.com/resources/blogs/2014/20140708_winston_filenames_b log.shtml

ITunes doesn't show some playlists for sync with iPhone ...

I've got a few smart playlists.
The annoying thing now is that some of them do not show up under "my iphone" / Music / Playlists.
So I can't sync them to my iPhone ;-(
I used to have this smart playlist in the iPhone section of iTunes - but I can't remember when it disappeared.
For instance, I've got a smart playlist that contains some of the latest episodes of some podcasts.
It is populated fine, but it does not show up in the playlists for sync with my iPhone.
Another smart playlist (which I call "random pop") contains some music from my music collection.
This one does show up in the iPhone section of iTunes ...
BTW, just in case you wonder why I have this smart playlist containing some episodes of the podcasts: first, there are some episodes that I don't care for on my iPhone; second, with this little trick I can jump by a simple double-click to the next episode, no matter which podcast it belongs to, while listening to my iPhone.
Any insights, tips, and suggestions will be highly appreciated!
Best regards,
Gabriel.

Mystery solved: the playlist is now under "my Iphone" / Podcasts / Include Episodes from Playlist ...

Not possible to determine posting period for date

Hi SAP Guru
While Creating the Shipment cost document in [VI01] transaction I am getting the error
Not possible to determine posting period for date with error Message no. SE105. There is no long text available
Please provide the solution for the same
Regards
Rahul

Hi Friend,
Check the posting periods for the company code in OB62 and OMSY.
Check whether they are in currenct date or not.
if not maintain them in MMPV for Company code.and OB62 for the fiscal year variant.
regards,
santosh

Workflow notification to several SPM owners

Hello,
we are trying to implement SPM using CUP for super user provisioning. In the workflow settings we have set "Super Access Owner" as a approver determinator. For we have several owners for one FF-ID we need all owners to be notified by CUP workflow. Unfortunetaly only the first owner (the first dataset in table /VIRSA/ZVIRFFIDS) gets a mail notification. Is it possible to send an e-mail to all owners?
Kind regards
Dennis Gruschka

when two customer report same issue.....
then mostly it turns out to be a bug..... sorry to annoy you
THANKS
regards,
Surpreet
... you are third one.......
Edited by: Surpreet Singh Bal on Nov 16, 2010 7:29 PM

How to determine the owner of the current package ?

From a package (that is defined with invoker's rights: AUTHID CURRENT_USER) I want to determine the owner of that package. (We plan to deploy the same code into multiple schemas.)
One approach would be to parse the results of DBMS_UTILITY.format_call_stack . . . any other ideas?
Thanks,
Mike

mtefft wrote:
We are using Total Recall aka Flashback Data Archive.
If you have a Flashback Data Archive on a table, you can not drop it without removing the archive, and to do that you need ADMINISTER FLASHBACK ARCHIVE privilege. We want to give users the ability to remove the flashback archive (this is an ALTER TABLE) from their own tables without granting that privilege.
So, we have a utilty schema which has this privilege. We created a definer-rights package to issue the alter, but it does not have ALTER ANY TABLE privilege. So, we added an invoker-rights package that the table-owner can call. This first issues GRANT ALTER ON [input-table-name] TO itself, then calls the definer-rights package, which now has both the system privilege and the object privilege needed. Why not just create a procedure owned by an "admin" user that does the alter table and grant execute on the proc to the utility schema ?
As an example with scott and sys (using sys in a real-world system would be a Bad Idea© but I'm on a playground database on my laptop) :
As Scott :Scott@my11g SQL>!cat createTable.sql
create table mytable (
id integer,
val varchar2(30),
constraint mytable_pk primary key(id)
Scott@my11g SQL>@createTable
Table created.As admin user :Sys@my11g SQL>!cat startFlashback.sql
alter table scott.mytable flashback archive fl_archive;
Sys@my11g SQL>alter table scott.mytable flashback archive fl_archive;
Table altered.
Sys@my11g SQL>select * from dba_flashback_archive_tables;
TABLE_NAME                     OWNER_NAME                     FLASHBACK_ARCHIVE_NAME
ARCHIVE_TABLE_NAME                                    STATUS
MYTABLE                        SCOTT                          FL_ARCHIVE
SYS_FBA_HIST_79498                                    ENABLEDAs admin user, I create the procedure and grant execute to scott :Sys@my11g SQL>!cat createProc.sql
create or replace procedure remove_flarch(
p_tabname varchar2
is
l_strcmd varchar2(200);
begin
for cur in (
select owner, table_name from dba_tables where owner=user and table_name=upper(p_tabname)
) loop
l_strcmd := 'alter table '||cur.owner||'.'||cur.table_name||' no flashback archive' ;
execute immediate l_strcmd ;
end loop;
end;
sho err
grant execute on remove_flarch to scott;
Sys@my11g SQL>@createProc.sql
Procedure created.
No errors.
Grant succeeded.As Scott I cannot disable the flashback archive explicitly :Scott@my11g SQL>alter table mytable no flashback archive ;
alter table mytable no flashback archive
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-55620: No privilege to use Flashback ArchiveBut I can do it using the procedure :Scott@my11g SQL>begin
2 sys.remove_flarch('MYTABLE');
3 end;
4 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.Checking from admin point of view :Sys@my11g SQL>select * from dba_flashback_archive_tables;
no rows selected
mtefft wrote:All is well, except for the fact that we want to deploy this under multiple schemas. So we need to know 'to whom should the ALTER TABLE grant be given?'Just grant execute on the procedure to your different users.

Hello sir i purchase second hand iphone4s now my iphone ask for activation with id and password i contact with previous owner and use that id and password but that also not work what i do ola help me i try all other method restore ' upgrade

hello sir i purchase second hand iphone4s now my iphone ask for activation with id and password i contact with previous owner and use that id and password but that also not work what i do ola help me i try all other method restore ' upgrade etc but none work plz say what i do if u find some solution tham msg me on
iPhone 4S

oenkz33 wrote:
this does not help at all for the second owner, after making the first owner id with careless, sorry for my english ...
Careless? Possible, but unlikely. Most likely the phone was stolen from the first owner. It would be a VERY careless iPhone owner who did not erase their personal information from a phone before selling it, and to do that it is necessary to disable Activation Lock. In most places in the world knowingly using stolen property is a crime, so the fact that the phone doesn't work may be the least of one's risks.

ALDSP 3.0 -- schema owner for stored procedure or SQL Statement

Using ALDSP, I have a need to create a physical service based on a stored procedure or a SQL statement. I am wondering what will happen when I move to another deployment environment where the schema owner changes. In our QA and Prod environments, we have a different schema owner for all tables in the application (the DBAs believe this prevents unwanted updates to a prod environment). DSP elegantly supports this for normal table- and view-based physical services by mapping schemas through the DSP console after deployment. Will I get the same type of mapping capability for stored procedures and SQL statements? I noticed that I can add a SQL-based function to a physical service...is there a way to pass in the physical table name from that data service to the procedure or SQL statement?
Thanks,
Jeff

Schema name substitution should work for stored procedures just like it does for tables. If it doesn't - report a bug.
You don't get any help for sql-statement based data services - dsp doesn't parse the sql provided. One thing you could do is use the default schema (following the user of your connection pool), and not specify the schema in your sql-statement.

SRM Contract alert management Workflow - WS10400022 Agents determination

Hi Experts,
I am trying to implement Alert management for SRM Contracts that are expired/ or the threshold is exceeded.
All the necessary configs are done and the event linkage is also done for the workflow Template WS10400022.
The task used in this workflow TS10407926, for agent determination, used the expression &Agents_0001.Agents&
This container value is neither passed from the event linkage binding.
Can anyone explain how this agent determination is done for this workflow?
Your replies are very much appreciated
Cheers,
Prem.

Hello,
OK, i did not see the event linkage between event and workflow...
Currently, &Agents_0001.Agents& is not populated with data coming from the event:
Event is managed by BBP_EV_API_EVENTS_SAVE function modul, and inside this FM by CL_BBP_EVENTS class.
Maybe you should open an OSS message and check all OSS notes dealing with BBP_CONTRACT_CHECK report.
Regards.
Laurent.

Org.data determination is possible for product scenario

org.data determination is possible for based on product scenario in transaction like for BP ? how can we do this? Pls guide me?
Thanking u in advance.

Hi
Marketing Organization
The marketing organization is an attribute of marketing plans and campaigns. It is part of the SAP organizational model that enables you to define how your company structures responsibilities in its marketing activities. You use the marketing organization to map the marketing logical enterprise structure to the organizational units in your company.
The marketing organization has the following attributes:
Product category
Country
Reference currency
You use these attributes to describe the marketing organization. For example, if you base your organizational units on brands, you can use the product category for the brand.
The marketing organization can be completely different from the sales organization or the service organization in CRM.
Marketing organizations are relevant for campaigns and marketing plans only. They are not relevant for trade promotions or deals. Consequently, the Marketing Org. field is available for campaigns and marketing plans only.
You can use the marketing organization attribute for:
Authorization checks
You can use the marketing organization in authorization checks, for example, to determine whether a user is authorized to change a particular campaign.
There are no marketing-specific authorization objects for the marketing organization. You can add authorization checks on the level of the marketing organization by using standard Organizational Management structural authorizations, or authority object PLOG. You can go down to the level of user name to build the authorization environment. To make settings for the structural authorizations, see Customizing for SAP Web Application Server, under Application Server Business Management SAP Business Workflow Authorization Management Structural Authorizations .
Automatic entry and checking of marketing attributes
The system can use the marketing organization for providing default entries to certain fields in Marketing.
Partner determination
For example, you can use the marketing organization to determine the appropriate marketing manager for the assigned marketing organization, and assign it to the campaign (on the Partner assignment block).
Workflow routing
You can assign a marketing organization to a campaign, and then start a workflow based on the attributes of the campaign. For example, you change the status of a campaign with a particular product category to For Approval. The system routs a workflow item to all users who are assigned to a marketing organization with this particular product category.
Cost planning
Cost planning enables you to split key figures across multiple dimensions. For example, you can use the marketing organization to distribute the costs of a campaign across several marketing organizational units.
Reporting
You can use the marketing organization in reporting. For example, you can measure the success of a particular organizational unit.
Regards
Manohar

UAR Approvals for roles with multiple owners

Hi All, We have in many cases, two role owners for roles defined in CUP. When running the UAR, both owners are notified.
However, when one of the owners submits the approved/removals UAR request, the request closes out and the other owner does not have the opportunity to validate the request also.
Any suggestions how to be able to accomodate both owners?
The UAR CAD option is out of scope since it makes no sense to upload and maintain 4000 roles in the CAD.
Thanks! -Dylan

FYI, We were not able to find an acceptable workflow solution but decided to restrict access via authorization. We will allow the role primary Role Owner to make the UAR line item updates but not allow the Role Owner to submit the UAR.
The Secondary Role Owner will be allowed to Submit final version of the UAR.
Role makeup:
ZAE_UAR_ROLE_OWNER (UAR Role Owner Approver)
AE.ViewAccessEnforcer
AE.ViewRemoveAccess
AE.ViewApprove
AE.ViewSaveRequest
ZAE_UAR_QUARTERLY_OWNER (UAR Quarterly Owner Approver)
AE.ViewAccessEnforcer
AE.ViewSubmitRequest
Hopefully, more workflow flexibility is will be built-in to the UAR just like with normal CUP requests.
Best Regards, Dylan

Determine Correct Agent for Escalation (Latest End)

Good Day
I am currently experiencing the following issue. I am the workflow administratrator for a project that just went live in a pilot phase.When checking transaction SWF_GMP (Administrator Overview). There are several Pending instances with missed deadline. After investigation realised that the agent specified for escalation were not being filled.
Then specified the following for the latest end tab for the agent. Rule 168 is used to determine the superior for the agent who accepted the work item. In the binding for the rule specified the variable Workitem.executeuser.NameWithLeadingUS = ORG_OBJECT.
Now when using the program RSWWDHEX_DEBUG and breaking on the function mdoule SWX_GET_MANAGE from Rule 168 to see which values were passed to the function module, the value passed is the background user and not the agent expected.
If you check the variable in the workflow log, the correct agent is displayed against the work item the escalation needs to take place from. So the issue is to find the correct agent for the workflow.
thanks
BJ

Hi,
> 1. If i go with same backend ECC 6 Ehp 4 with Portal 7.3, than what are all the BP's that i have to deploy?
BP's depends upon what all functionality you want to use. e.g If you are using ESS/MSS then you need to deploy BP's for ESS/MSS.
> 2. Can i go with same Business packages those i am using currently with Portal 7.01?
You should install latest version of BP's on NW 7.3 like for ESS/MSS latest version is 1.51.
> 3. How to migrate my ESS and MSS apps (customized apps NWDI )from Portal 7.01 to 7.3
You need to migrate all these customization manually as PAR files are not more supported for NW 7.3.
> 4. in future if we upgarde our backend to EHP 5 than what happens to WD java Application. i come to know that ESS application are totally built on WD ABAP for EHP5
>
It depends upon you. If you want to use ESS/MSS for web dynpro ABAP then you need to install BP of ESS for web dynpro ABAP but if you don't want to use web dynpro then you can use same way as you are doing currently.
Check SAP Note 1450179 - ESS Based on Web Dynpro ABAP Available.
Thanks
Sunny

When i double click itunes it doesn't open it just comes up with an error saying " The itunes library.itl file cannot be found or created. The default location for this file is in the 'itunes' folder in the 'music' folder". How can i fix this?

When i double click itunes it doesn't open it just comes up with an error saying " The itunes library.itl file cannot be found or created. The default location for this file is in the 'itunes' folder in the 'music' folder. How can i fix this problem?

Anyone can help to advice how to solve this issue ?

E613 SYST: You cannot determine the period for rule 03

Dear All,
We are configuring asset module and using MSTL dep key for Tax books. When we tried to create an asset with MSTL dep key, we encountered error - 'E613 SYST: You cannot determine the period for rule 03'. when verified config OAVH Define Calender Assignments transaction, Period control '03' is missing for fiscal year variant K4. Period control is exisiting in Maintain Period Control and but not in Define Calender Assignment. What I understand these period controls are being delivered by SAP. Not sure why period control '03' is missing. all other period control keys are available.
question is how to add period control 03 so that we can use MSTL dep key. we are currently using 4.7c. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
thanks
Sunil

message went abruptly before I finish.
+++++++++
continuing from previous email
Period control 01 has following entry in the transaction
Fiscal Year Variant Per control Name of the period control Year Month Day Period Mid Month
K4 01 Pro rata at period start date blank 0 0 blank not selected
If I follow SAP help to define period control '03', then I just need to copy period control '01' which is listed above and select 'Mid Month' check box.
Wondering anyone did this in the past. MSTL depreciation key is being used in MACRS tax for US. I am sure people who have implemented assets module for US with tax dep, they might have encountered this issue.
thanks
Sunil

SharePoint Foundation 2013 Workflow Doesn't Send Email

We are trying to create a workflow that will send an email if a field in a new item in a list contains a certain value.
Example: A user adds a new item to a particular list. The workflow is supposed to send an email if the Number field = 3 in that item.
We can add the item, but the workflow doesn't appear to send the email.
The workflow looks like this:
Step 1: If Current Item:Number equals 3
Email John Doe
then Stop the workflow
Any ideas would be appreciated. Thanks.

Try adding Current Item:Number to log history and check the values are matching properly.
Validate the data types like both are number field to get your condition through. else add an intermediate variable to help this.
Check the send email functionality with out any conditions to validate your smtp configured properly at server.
Hope this helps.
Bistesh

Workflow doesn't determine WBS owner for SC with Combination of CC & WBS

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for