Workflow issue after transport to QA system

Greetings,
After transport to QA my workflow does not execute the job I've assigned to my step.
I have a program assigned as a background job in a step that gets triggered by a typical workflow event.
I believe this is the first workflow for their system... and it's definately my first as well.
I can see the workflow executing using the trace.... but my job never runs.
I'm beginning to suspect I need to refresh the workflow buffer... but perhaps it's an authorization issue
Please advise...
Doug -

Doug:
First refresh the memory of the workflow to take the new changes ok, transaction SWU_OBUF.
Just to be sure, check the transaction SWU3 and check if everything is OK.
The posible authorization problem is for the User WF-BATCH, so check the authorizations for this user.
Best Regards,
Jessica

Similar Messages

Condition doesn't work after transport to QAS system.

Hi all:
the condition doesn't work after the workflow transported to QAS system. the workflow designed has a constraint that only the creation of the document of Type M4 can trigger the workflow, but creation of Type M5 document can also trigger the workflow, could you please tell me the possible reason?
Thank you very much

Hi,
Once Try checking as pavan suggested whether the Customizing requested is transported.
To Maintain Workflow start conditions you can also maintain through SWB_COND and ensure its transported.
Regards
Narin

Issue whilel transporting from production system to quality system

Hi All,
    I am facing issue in process chain when I transport it from production system to quality system. Process chain is related to deleting PSA logs. When transported to quality system object_type and object_name fields in display variant becomes blank. In production system it is showing 8ZXXX_CA, it should become 8ZXXX_HA in quality system.
   Thanks for your help.
Regards,
Shankar

Hi,
    sorry it was frm dev system to quality system, not prod to quality.
Regards,
Shankar

Workflow issue after upgrade to ECC 6.0

Hi,
we are facing an workflow issue and thought if someone has faced similar issue and could help us.
We've an approval workflow for purchase requisitions through release strategies. For some steps, if the approver is 'WF-BATCH' user, we are executing that step using a program. This program first set the workitem to completed status( this part is working), then it will close the purchase requisition to release status for a particular release code( this part is working) and then we are triggering the 'RELEASE' event for the business object providing the Object key which should take it to the next step( THIS IS NOT WORKING). The business object is custom. This was working perfectly in 4.7 version of SAP but this logic is not working in ECC6.0. we are using SAP_WAPI_CREATE_EVENT to trigger the event. But the workflow doesn't move on to next step.
Have anyone of you have any idea as why this might be happening. Any information on this would be of great help.
This is happening in ECC 6.0. USED TO WORK IN EARLIER VERSION.
Regards,
Sam K

Hi,
Is WF-BATCH having proper auth. ?
Or, if you are using the FM SAP_WAPI_CREATE_EVENT in some program and is scheduled as a batch job, then that user under which this batch job is runnign should have proper auth. to raise the event. Please check those.
Also, what the error (if any) says in SWEL ?
venu

Incorrect Workflow version after transport

Hi,
A modification was made to the standard Booking Approval workflow (WS01200151). The changes were successful and a new runtime version was generated on the development system.
There seems to be a problem with the activation of Workflows transported to the QA system. After the transport no new version were activated on the QA system although the active version was included in the transport. (landscape: Development > QA > Production). I created a new version and also transported this, but the new version were not active. The status on QA was still "Runtime version, Saved".
I checked the transport log and there were no errors and all objects were moved to the QA system. However, when I check the workflow versions on QA, there are multiple inactive versions now QA. There are only 7 on development but there are about 60 on the QA system. The 2 workflows are not in-sync.
The QA system is not open for changes and it is not ideal to open it either because then we will have to open the Production system as well. Does anyone know why the active version were not transported and how to fix this besides opening the QA system for changes?
I am quite new to workflow and your help will be much appreciated.
Regards
Liza-Marie

Thanks for the feedback, I learnt something new.
The version in table HRS1205 on Development is 0007 and on QA it is 0006 and I executed function module SWD_WFD_REPLICATE_FROM_9999 but nothing is updated. I debugged the FM and found that it exits (without any exception) as the transport version details (date & time) is the same as the 9999 version (code line 91).
SWD_WFD_REPLICATE_FROM_9999 reads table SWDSHEADER and in this table the last version is 0182! I don't know how all the versions from 0007 and 0182 was created but this seems to be causing problems. I don't want to write a program to delete those redundant entries as I'm not sure what the impact would be. Do you know if there is a FM to delete the entries from table SWDSHEADER or any other table that would get rid of these versions?
To answer your question, I can view the WF in PFTC, there are no messages.
I will check OSS if I can find something.
Thanks for you help, it's much appreciated.
Liza-Marie

SharePoint 2007 performance issue after upgrading the operating system

We upgraded the operating system of our SharePoint Server 2007 from 2003 to 2008 R2. After upgrade we rebuilt the SharePoint using content DBs we backed up before upgrade. All settings is same except that we moved the DBs to new SQL servers. Now users are
reporting performance issue with sites. I experienced it myself some of the pages takes 9-30 seconds to load. Also our SharePoint server is single server. I monitored the SharePoint Server and it is fine. I did fiddler trace and here are the result. I see
lots of 401 (login failed) errors then 302 (redirect) then 200 (OK). Do you know why we are getting 401 errors?
Result
Protocol
Host
URL
Body
Caching
Content-Type
Process
184
401
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/bif/EUROPE-AMA
341
text/html; charset=us-ascii
iexplore:15344
185
302
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/bif/EUROPE-AMA
196
text/html; charset=UTF-8
iexplore:15344
186
401
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/bif/EUROPE-AMA/default.aspx
341
text/html; charset=us-ascii
iexplore:15344
187
200
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/bif/EUROPE-AMA/default.aspx
105,487
private, max-age=0; Expires: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 21:37:48 GMT
text/html; charset=utf-8
iexplore:15344
188
401
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/_layouts/1033/styles/calendar.css?rev=BrbrIU86qTG2EHx1ZUuFBQ%3D%3D
341
text/html; charset=us-ascii
iexplore:15344
189
200
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/_layouts/images/prevbuttonltr.gif
76
max-age=31536000
image/gif
iexplore:15344
190
200
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/_layouts/images/nextbuttonltr.gif
78
max-age=31536000
image/gif
iexplore:15344
191
200
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/_layouts/images/day.gif
1,051
max-age=31536000
image/gif
iexplore:15344
192
200
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/_layouts/images/month.gif
1,068
max-age=31536000
image/gif
iexplore:15344
193
200
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/_layouts/1033/styles/calendar.css?rev=BrbrIU86qTG2EHx1ZUuFBQ%3D%3D
28,814
max-age=31536000
text/css
iexplore:15344
194
200
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/_layouts/images/week.gif
1,057
max-age=31536000
image/gif
iexplore:15344
195
200
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/_layouts/images/weekbox.gif
149
max-age=31536000
image/gif
iexplore:15344
196
200
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/_layouts/images/alldayDefault.gif
157
max-age=31536000
image/gif
iexplore:15344
197
200
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/_layouts/images/calnumBttntoday.gif
146
max-age=31536000
image/gif
iexplore:15344
198
200
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/_layouts/images/calnumBttn.gif
95
max-age=31536000
image/gif
iexplore:15344

Hi
when you request a Site collection (http://domain/) or a Site (http://domain/foo/) of your Publishing Site you get redirected to the http://domain/Pages/<WelcomePage>.aspx. SharePoint 2007 uses the 302 header (location temporarily moved) for
this purpose. Surprisingly even WSS uses the 302 header to redirect a root url to the default.aspx. In comparison ASP.NET uses an internal redirect to render the default page when the root url requested: there is no redirect in this situation.
Check the link which can give more input
http://blog.mastykarz.nl/sharepoint-2007-redirect-solved-using-301-instead-of-302-redirects/
for error 401 you can check this link
http://discussions.citrix.com/topic/97027-no-resources-401-unauthorized/d
and check SharePoint ULS logs and event viewer for any exceptions.
Please mark the Answer and Vote me if you think that it will help you to resolved your issue

CUA issue; after roles are removed systems assigned to users remain?

Hello,
I've had this specific issue with CUA for some time, but haven't needed to try and resolve until now.
The problem is this:
- after security roles for a user have been removed for an entire system, in the system tab entries remain.
- this results in the user account remaining in the child system, even though there are no security roles assigned.
I have tried removing system entries once all roles are removed, however after saving the changes I see that the systems still exist.
So, can anyone comment on why this happens? Is there an SAP note to resolve this?
Appreciate the feedback.
Paul

Paul Vipond wrote:
Thanks Julius.
My intention is not to delete users. What I'm expecting to happen is that after I remove all the roles assigned to user for a specific child system, that user should not exist in the child system anymore.
If you delete the system assignment for a child system, A deletion of the user in that system will happen.
Paul Vipond wrote:
This is the way it has worked for many child systems, but not all. For me it's specifically my production systems where a user account remains after all the roles have been removed.
In dev/test systems I've removed all roles assigned to a user and after saving their account no longer exists in those dev/test systems.
Make sense?
If that is so, that is a bug in your dev/test system. I suggest to open an incident wiht SAP then.
It should work like in a standalone system.... Removing all roles there will never lead to a deletion of that user!
b.rgds, Bernhard

Service Group is blank after transporting into IST system

Hi All,
We have 2 CE 7.2 systems as DEV and IST which are well connected to NWDI. In DEV NWDI track, we have many WDJava components which consume web services available on DEV system. For these services, we have created a Service Group which has all these services inside it. IN DEV, I have assigned the local system to all these services inside the service group and it works fine.
Then we released all our components to IST system and this service group also got deployed in IST. I configued the service group also in IST to point it to proper system. Then some how after releaseing some new activites, all the references in IST service group are valished but the consumer proxies in IST for these services show they are part of service group.
We released new activity for service group also from Dev to IST but still the service group in IST is blank.
Can anyone explain why this could have happened and any solution for this?

Hello Panda,
Please make sure that all the report elements are collected while transporting, because some elements might have got missed or not collected in the transport request. You can collect the same report again in a new transport and check it.
Thanks
Chandran

BSP link to Workflow task after transport - trans BDLSS

I was able to call a BSP from SAPGUI inbox (trans SBWP) by doing the necessary config in transactions WF_HANDCUST and WF_EXTSRV - generate my task from WF_EXTSRV, etc. The task was generated as a local object but I converted this to a transportable object.
This worked in our development system.
I need to get this into a test system and all the config/workflows was transported correctly. However the link between the bsp and task is not on table SWLWPTSSID as in dev 010.
Iu2019m trying to run transaction BDLSS or report RBDLSMAP to convert the table but that does not appear to be working. What table should I convert in trans BDLSS? Does anyone have any idea what Iu2019m doing wrong?

All,
Resolved this. Here is the solution -
It came down to bad/missing entries in table SWLWPTSSID. This is the table that links the web service maintained in WF_EXTSRV with the workflow task. As it is a client-dependent setting, when you transport the task and webservice you also need to adjust this table using transaction SM30.
Cheers, Liz

Workflow issue after configuring DMZ.

Hi,
I am facing issues with regards to my worflow, after configuring DMZ.
Recently we have configured DMZ, As per the document 380490.1.
Database tier : bwerpdbs02
Internal Application tier : bwerp
Dmz tier : bwerpgrd04
Our SMTP server name is bsf-hc-01. whenever the internal application tier is bounced the SMTP server name gets changed to bwerpgrd04 which is not my SMTP/IMAP server name.
Everytime the internal application is bounced, i need to do the changes manually in the workflow configuration tab ie : Changing of the SMTP server name from bwerpgrd04 to bsf-hc-01.
EBS :
12.1.3
DB:
11.2.0.1
Please check and revert.
Thanks,
Fahim.

Hi;
Did you check under Configure Apache - put this in a small script (runc.sh), that way you have a record of how it was configured part at in same doc?
Regard
Helios

BADI not found in QA System after transporting from DEV system

Hi,
I had created a new implementation ZHR_IN_CALC_PTX_AMT to the BADI: HR_IN_CALC_PTX_AMT in the DEV system with Request ID. But when i had transported that request, i am not able to find that BADI implementation in SE18 and SE19 respectively in Quality system.
Please suggest me on this, as this is urgent.
Regards.
Ravi

Hi,
Can you pls repeat the BADI Definition name? I couldn't find HR_IN_CALC_PTX_AMT in SAP versions 4.7, 5.0 and 6.0. Which is the version you use for development?
Regards,
Renjith Michael.

Loads Issue after Upgrade in Production system

Hi Guys,
Yesterday we did 4.6c to Ecc6.0 upgrade,
After As a BW Team member i activate my BW Source system and Replicate the whole D/S, i Activate all the Transfer rules using RS_TRANSTRU_ACTIVATE_ALL. Then i started Loads through Process Chains but Previously loads are taken 20-40 min max right now it's takeing 3-5hours,
when i verify the detail steps in monitor step still Extractor level only, When i go to the RSA3 in Ecc 6.0 I can see the Data. but here i hav't see the data after 3 hours.
please suggest me wht r the steps i have to do after upgrade...
Thank you,
DST

Hi,
You might want to check your SMQS settings... also monitor closely transaction SM58 in the source system.... I encountered the same thing during upgrade and had to schedule a job every 10mins or so to trigger the push of the IDocs.
Hope this helps.
Cheers,
Gimmo

Local class invisible after transport to test system

Hello,
i face the following strange problem:
I have a local class within another class, and in the development system, i can access this local class via its entry in the object tree in object navigator. My class has a subnode "Local Classes" there, which also has a subnode for my specific local class.
I transported the coding to the test system and it works well there too, but for some reason i cannot see my local class in the se80. The class is apparently transported, the programm works, and if i execute my programm in debugging mode, i can even go through the code lines of the local class, but i can't find it in the se80.
Does anyone know why this happens?

Tobias Falke wrote:
> But why do i have to do this manually?
Good question. Next question?

In Process Workflow Issue after Client Copy

Hi
We have made a client copy on our training system and wish to process workflow that were created on the original client. Currently, of course, all the workflow instances have the original client. Is there a way we can change this to the new client?
Regards
Ian

Looks like there is something the basis boys ran to update these instances (and any other non workflow related thinks). It is all part of the client copy process apparently.
Cheers
Ian

Problem after transport to Quality system

Hi,
I've done the transport of my SWCV from DEV to QLD and everything works fine. I've check all the components in the IR and ID and make the necessary adjustments. But when i try to realize a test from RW with my interface all that i can get is a red box with an exclamation point inside and above this a red cross line and no message appears in XI monitor. Also i've look at Message monitoring and no message avaiable either for Integration Engine or Adapter Engine. Although when i test my interface in IR using the option Tools/Test configuration I get the following error:
Receiver Determination
Internal Error
HTTP connection to ABAP Runtime failed. Error: 403 Forbidden URL: http://ed18tci1f.appl.edinfor.pt:8078/sap/xi/simulation?sap-client= User: XIDIRUSER
Can anyone provide me some help???
Thanks in advance,
JMMatos

Hi Jose,
Please take a look at this thread..
HTTP connection to ABAP Runtime failed
cheers,
Prashanth

Workflow issue after transport to QA system

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for