Workflow Issue for transaction IMA11

HI All,
I am replacing standard WF copying standard one, and decativated standard one and so that new workflow should only be triggered.
Issue is, In SPRO goto below path:
-Invetset management-Appropriation Requests-Approval-Activate Event-Linkage for Workflow Task
There is a setting which shows standard workflow and actiavte button which make sure that if this is activated. then only workflow approval process should be run and in transaction IMa11 approval button shld be greyed out.
But in my case I am not able to config my new WF No. there and as i had decatiavted older workflow so In SPRO its showing deactivated status and making approval button active and because of that approval button is becaming active and now user able to approve request from IMA11 and beside this, workflow is also running for approval process.
so process would at a time either workflow shld approve or tarsnsaction.
Now I want to know how i will config new workflow number in SPRO by replacing older WF No.

Hi Sandeep,
We have a transaction SWETYPV to see and chaneg Work flow linkages.
Please try out there.
Hope this helps.

Similar Messages

User exit for transaction IMA11

Dear friends,
I want to update the "user responsible" field of transaction IMA11 under the user fields tab.The updated "user responsible" has to be updated in table PROJ and PRPS.I have searched for the exits available.the exit AAIR0006 allows us to update PRPS table only.Can anybody suggest how to update PROJ in this case?
Solution will be awarded points!!!!!
Thanks,
Rajesh Sahal

Hi Rajesh
Check these User-Exits
Exit Name           Description
AAIR0001            IM-IS: User value fields in app.req. reporting
AAIR0002            IM-FA: User fields for app. requests
AAIR0003            IM: Workplace assignmt when creating PM order from app.req.
AAIR0004            IM Drilldown: Definition of User-Defined Characteristics
AAIR0006            IM-FA-IA: Data Transfer from App. Req. to WBS Element
Reward points if useful..
Regards
Nilesh

Workflow issue for leave request

Hi All,
we have workflow which apporves the leave rquest created by an employee through MSS.
It's a standard workflow.The workflow number is 01200003.
The problem is workflow sits in waiting position forever to lock the employee.i.e it doesn't lock the employee neither it gives an error.
The workflow log just shows waiting process.
I tried to check the method which the lock employee task calls and it's a standard method to enqueue employee.
The method works perfectly when it's checked independently through business object.
but when executed through workflow it stucks there.
My problem is the same workflow and the same version is working in our development system but not in qulaity system.
Can anybody tell me how can I find that what's going wrong in there and what can i do to correct it and also how can I stop this waiting workflow.
Thanks
Umang

Hi Umang,
The problem is with DEAD LINE MONITORING of the work flows,
In transaction SWU3, CHeck for the scheduled Background job for Missed dead lines is set or not.
If it is not then you have to set that, it will solve your issue.
Reward points if it resolved your issue.
Regards,
Krian I

Authorization access Issue for Transaction Codes PA10 to PA40

Hi Experts,
I have created Custom role for accessing ALL HR Transaction codes in IDES System and added to the user & Tested.
All transactions codes are working fine except PA10,PA20,PA30 &PA40
We have new installation of ECC6.0 (HR) IDES System.
I am new to HR Security.
Here anything needs to configure in HR System for accessing transaction code PA10 to PA40.
Please help me regading this.
Advance Thanks,
BBC

I have checked in SM01, Transaction codes PA10 to PA40 are not locked.
We are facing two issues
1) when accessing T- Codes PA10 to PA40, System showing message: You are not authorized to use Transaction code.
Thatz the reason i suggested you to check with basis consultant. Becuas he is the power user he can only see that from his window all the autharizations
May be you checked from your user your user might have autharization. that user might be end user who getting msg might not have authorizatoins.
2) function module : HR_READ_INFOTYPE.
When Debuging this, It calls internal FM
HR_CHECK_AUTHORITY_INFTY and returns exception
no_authorization=1
See this means that that user have NO autharizatoins
Best Regards

Workflow Events for transaction FP09

Hi All,
The requirement is to trigger a workflow when the user posts a return lot through transaction FP09. I used the event trace but this transaction does not fire any event when we post a Return Lot. I tried to find some user exits but with no luck. Is it possible to fire an event when a field in the database table changes ? The table is a standard table(DFKKRK) and the field is STARS. When this field holds a number 5 then it depicts that the document is posted.
Best Regards,
Sudhi

Hi Sudhi,
Have you checked for a BADI? It is not possible to fire an event when a field in the database table changes if no change docs exist.
What specific industry solution/extension are we dealing with here? Both the transaction and table are not available at my installation.
Ramki Maley.

Authorization Issue for Transaction Codes PA10,PA20,PA30 &PA40

Hi Experts,
I have created Custom role for accessing ALL HR Transaction codes in IDES System and added to the user & Tested.
All transactions codes are working except PA10,PA20,PA30 &PA40
Please help me regading this.
Advance Thanks,
BBC

Hi,
I had check with basis Team, they told that I have all authorizations.
This is New Installation for R/3 HR IDES System. even basis Team also created role for above transaction code but not getting access.
We can accesss all transaction codes except these.
All are new for HR. here anything needs to be configure for access PA10 to PA40 Transaction codes.
Please advice me.
Thanks & Regards,
BBC

Workflow Issue For Documentary

I'm about to start importing clips for an hour long documentary. I have a G4 Powerbook with Final Cut Express and this computer a G4 with FCP5.
Ideally, I would like to be able to digitize my sound bytes into the Powerbook so that I can take it with me for transcription purposes.
I've never done this before and I haven't used an EDL since my AVID days. I'd like some suggestions on the best way to go about this. I do have an 80gig Lacie Drive that I can move between computers. Of course, the more organized and sensible I can be in the editing process the easier the edit will be.
An engineer for CNN I ran into at CompUSA suggested that I edit in offline RT on the laptop and then transfer everything to my G4. Evidently many CNN editors doing long-form in the field do this.
Anyway I'm not sure how to go about that so I don't even know what questions to ask at this point.
Any ideas would be appreciated.

Yeah, I think there's one issue you might want to know about. Check out this review at Ken Stone's and see what the situation is with timecode in the Viewer:
Review: Final Cut Express
. . . as in, you won't see any. Only the relative position from frame 1 of the captured clip. But, when you bring the project into FCP, the timecode will magically appear. So, it's a little weird to work in FCE w/o TC, but if you're going to FCP, it rights itself.
Second, if you plan on adding any filters with keyframes, you'll find that FCE is limited to two - the first frame and the last.

Workflow issues for checking in content in URM

I am pretty new to the whole workflow thing and am giving it my best shot.
I am trying to trigger the workflow for all new content that has the account 'ABC'. Setting up the criteria was the easy part.
The hard part for me is the statements that actually trigger the workflow.
I used the following statements, where my name is entered into the metadata field xvg_busconname and received this error:
<$wfSet("wfMailSubject","workflow item " & DocName)$>
<$wfSet("wfMessage", "This item has been checked in." & DocName)$>
<$wfNotify(xvg_busconname,"user")$>
Error executing script:
Evaluated value: <$wfSet("wfMailSubject","workflow item " & DocName)$>
<$wfSet("wfMessage", "This item has been checked in." & DocName)$>
<$wfNotify(xvg_busconname,"user")$>. Offset in runtime evaluation is at line 3 and character 27. Could not find the parameter 'xvg_busconname'&lrm;.
wfMailSubject=workflow item
wfMessage=This item has been checked in.
I also tried it slightly different, where my email address was entered into the metadata field xvg_busconeemail:
<$wfSet("wfMailSubject","workflow item " & DocName)$>
<$wfSet("wfMessage", "This item has been checked in." & DocName)$>
<$wfNotify(xvg_busconemail,"emailformat")$>
and recieved this error:
Error executing script:
Evaluated value: <$wfSet("wfMailSubject","workflow item " & DocName)$>
<$wfSet("wfMessage", "This item has been checked in." & DocName)$>
<$wfNotify(xvg_busconemail,"emailformat")$>. Offset in runtime evaluation is at line 3 and character 27. Could not find the parameter 'xvg_busconemail'&lrm;.
wfMailSubject=workflow item
wfMessage=This item has been checked in.
If anyone sees an obvious problem with where I am going wrong, please let me know.
Thanks.

Hi liqian,
Download the ContentIntegrationSuite which gives you Java API's to interract with URM.
I would like to know about the usage of agent services / web services to checkin / checkout the content from Content Server.
regards
Ravi.

Workflow issue for Overtime Payment

Hello All,
Scenario: Employee enters his overtime hours through ESS.
His overtime gets approved by his manager. Once approved it updates the IT0015 addtional payments with the respective wage type & hrs.
Problem: The employee has applied for overtime for dates ex: 16.04.2008. HI overtime has also been approved by manager.
As per the workflow, it should create a record in IT0015. But its not updating/creating any record in IT005.
It gives error message: "personnel number(s) could not be locked:
My logic: As per my understanding, the personnel no has been was locked by some other process in system.
I chekced the status of the workflow through SWi1 in graphic, here it shows as " Completed" with no errors.
Kindly advice me as what needs to be done in this case.Shall we ask the user to apply again? or whats the solution?
Thanks & Regds,
Nithi

Hi Nithi,
In this case you probably can add the entry in infotype 0015 manually. But you should also take a look at the workflow. There should be check after the step for adding the entry if the update was succesful, if not you could wait for a certain period and try again. Us a counter in this loop so after a certain amount of tries you could send a task to a HR administartor (or someone like that) who should do the update manually.
This way you could avoid these kind of errors.
Regards,
Martin

Date difference issue for Purchase order in R/3 and APO

Hi,
I am sending the purchase order from APO to R/3. When I transfer the data through CIF and see the curresponding entries in stock requirement list in R/3, purchase order is 1 day earlier than in SCM.
However, when this purchase order is CIFed back to SCM, date appears correct in SCM ( as what it was before). Is this something because of timezone that difference in date appears in SCM and R/3.
Can someone who came across date issues for transaction data transfer between SCM and R/3 elaborate in more detail please.
Thanks,
Sanjay

Hello Somnath ,
I am also facing the same issue which sanju was facing earlier in PRs .
In APO I am not able to understand how system calculates the opening , start and end date .In my case the transportation time is 48 hrs , planned delivery time is 1 day and all calenders are 5*24 , GR proceeeing time .01 day . When I am creating PR at destination location on 06/06/2008 , 24:00:00 Hrs . System calculates the dates as follows :-
Start date -06/05/2008 , 00:45:00 , end date -06/06/2008, 24:00:00 , opening date -05/20/2008 ,23:25:00 Hrs . I tried to understand the formula given by you in your reply as Opening Date = Requirement Due Date - GR Time - Planned Delivery Time
Start Date = Requirement Due Date - GR time - Transportation Duration
End date = Requirement Date.
But I am not getting the desired results.
Could you let me know why the system is behaving in such way.I also want to know does system can create orders in such a way the opening date lies in past. If yes then can we restrict that ?
Regards ,
Mukesh
Edited by: Mukesh Kumar on Mar 9, 2008 1:59 PM

LR 3 Bug Report - file renaming error - significant workflow issue

System configuration:
MacPro Dual 2x2.66Ghz Dual Core Intel Xeon
9GB RAM
OSX 10.6.4
Lightroom Application on System Drive
Canon .CR2 files and Lightroom Catalog on internal software-based RAID drive
Camera Raw Cache set to 50GB and resident on System drive
Here is the issue:
Once I finish the first round of editing a group of photos, I then rename them with the title of the event and a sequence number. I use LR's batch rename feature in the Library module. If I then delete 1 or more of these photos and attempt to rename them again(same event title + numerical sequence), the new names do not properly apply the numerical sequence after the filename. Either of the following can happen, and whcih one will happen is not dependednt on what I do.
1. The files can be renamed, with the first image having a sequence number 1 number higher than the lowest number I typed into the sequence box in the batch rename dialog (if I type a number 1, the sequence starts at 2). There are also random gaps in the sequence numbering scheme. For example, the numbers will count to 15, then skip to 17, then count to 176, then skip to 178. The rest of the files might be renamed correctly, or there might be gaps. The gaps always skip a single number, and most of the time the numbers skipped are odd numbers, though numbers with a 16 are usually skipped (16, 116, 216)
2. The files can be renamed as mentioned above, but with the addition of a -1 to the end of the sequence (example: filename-200-1 or filename-3-1). The addition of the -1 is also random, though it is more common with lower-numbered files than higher-numbered files.
I have experienced this bug on groups as small as 50 photos or as large as several hundred. I have tried remaning the files to a completely different text/sequence combination and then back to the one I want, and it does not help the issue. The sequence numbering is more likely to have more gaps the more virtual copies are present in the series of photos being renamed.
This is a major workflow issue for me because the files I deliver have to be named sequentially, without gaps, following a specific text/numer naming convention. The bug is currently adding many extra hours to my post-production time. Any assitance would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you

Thanks for the detailed description. I was able to repro this with your steps and have logged a bug for futher investigation.
Becky

User Exit / BADi for TCode - IMA11 (Create Appropriation Request )

Hi friends ,
            Can anyone help me in finding the User Exit / BADI for Transaction IMA11 (Create Appropriation Request , Module - FI ).I want to create search help for field "Partner" in table control "Person Involved" present in this transaction.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Nand Kishor

Hi,
The following user exits are available :
Exit Name           Description
AAIR0001            IM-IS: User value fields in app.req. reporting
AAIR0002            IM-FA: User fields for app. requests
AAIR0003            IM: Workplace assignmt when creating PM order from app.req.
AAIR0004            IM Drilldown: Definition of User-Defined Characteristics
AAIR0006            IM-FA-IA: Data Transfer from App. Req. to WBS Element
regards
Aveek

Workflow issue with interco transactions & general ledger entries in F-02

Hello Experts,
We are encountering a workflow issue when we are entering intercompany transactions with general ledger entries in F-02. Our workflow is set up with two release levels and the details are as follows:
Amount below $2500 - single release level
Amount above $2500 - two release levels
The document type that we are using is SU and it is configured with intercompany postings and trading partner enabled in the control data.
After parking a GL document that has interco amount entries below $2500 and general ledger amount entries above $2500 in F-02, the document is supposed to go to the two release levels in the workflow because the total amount is above $2500 (interco amount + general ledger amount > $2500). However, in the workflow, the document went to the single release level instead of the two release levels.
Any idea why the subledger amount takes precedent over the general ledger amounts in determining the workflow release level?
We would appreciate your help in solving this issue.

You cannot change the design of the system.
SAP may consider the change of design if all the users across the industries are reported. If a single user has a special requirement, it cannot be changed.
You need to ask, whether this is a critical requirement for your business. Otherwise, please follow the standard way.

Issue with CIF Integration model for Transaction data

Hi Gurus,
I have activated the Integration model for PO & PReqs by location wise and i assumed that transaction data is online and we need not to re activate for any new Product / location combination got created in system.
But the issue is that every time a new material got created, we need to deactivate and activate the integration model for Transaction data to get the transaction data into APO.
Is there any way to avoid the following exercise as it is taking very long time for activation.
Please guide me as it is very urgent.
Thanks for help in advance...
Thanks & Regards,
Jagadeesh

I assume 1,60,000 location products are spread around different locations.
Rather than one Integration Model it is better to have multiple Integration Models.
For example: one for each region like North America, one for Europe, one for Asia (assuming you have countries spread across the world). Or create Intgeration Model by Country.
This way you reduce the number of Products in an Integration Model.
It is very important to have manageable set of Integration Models. Let me give an example - you have some problem hence the single Material Master Integration Model is down (inactive). At that time any PP or PDS transfer will not have the Header or COmponent products transferred to APO (in effect PDS/PPM cannot be transferred). If you are creating or converting Planned Orders they will not transfer to R/3 (as Header product is not part of active intgeration model).
But if you have country spefic or region specific Integration Model - only that country is affected not all.
In fact you should have other integration model (like PDS/PPM, Procurement Relationships, Planned / Production Orders, Sales Orders, Stocks) in same manner i.e. either Country(s) specific or group of countries by region. The risk of models getting inactive or taking too much time to activate after regeneration easily outweighs management of more number of Integration Models (compared to one Global integration model per object).
Hope this gives you some direction.
Somnath

Import container contains errors issue for Release Strategy workflow

Hello Experts,
I have copied the standard workflow WS20000075 for PO approval on Release step.
the copied workflow works fine in sandbox system, but in the test system I get an error saying 'import container contains errors (are any obligatory elements missing?)' I guess 'ReleaseCode' is not getting passed to the Workflow from the PO creation T-code.
I went thru few SCN post, did check all the Linkages as said, everything seems to be ok. but still cannot trigger the workflow.
need guidance as to where I may be going wrong.
Regards,
Jibran

Hi Jibran
If the WF is working in sandbox, it means that your definition, linkages etc are correct.
Please check if the following note is relevant for you or not:
1770720 - PO workflows run into error SFW_RUN594 - Import container contains errors
It's about correcting the settings in SWEC and SWE2 (correct for your custom workflow definition)
If not, then confirm with your MM consultant if the release strategy is configured correctly or not....take hints from the following SCN thread:
http://scn.sap.com/message/14682486#14682486
Regards,
Modak

Workflow Issue for transaction IMA11

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for