Workflow Logs Issue

Hi Everybody,
I have one more issue now, please anyone help me to solve this.
When I create a PO, the WF is getting triggered and when all the approvals are done the PO is getting released. - This is fine, the issue is when I change the PO that is already released, I am getting two WF logs with status 'In progress'.
Out of the two WFs Logs, one WF went to Approvers inbox and the other one got struck at one of the Steps.
Could anyone please let me know what could be the possible reason.
Let me tell you, when I change the PO before releasing everything is working fine. One issue is happening when I change the released PO.
Thanks in Advance,
Murali.

Hi Atul,
The WF triggering conditions are looking fine and both create and change are working fine. The problem is occuring only when the PO is completed processed, means released and then changed qty or some other value on PO.
When a released PO changed, the Release indicator is reset(Standard Functionality). The issue is occuring when the Release indicator is reset. My WF has one of the steps to Reset Release indicator using the FM 'BAPI_PO_RESET_RELEASE' and now I have commented out this FM in the step. Even after doing this it is showing two logs in WF.
Please let me know if I need to check anywhere else.

Similar Messages

Refresh workflow item issue after task processing

Hi expert,
We have a urgent client issue regarding work item in SAP inbox. I am new in workflow process.
He has 142 work item in his inbox for invoce processing. But he has processed 70 from them. After processing these 70 invoices, all processed workitem should be gone from his workitem list. But some of wotkitem which has been processed, are still there in his inbox after refreshing inbox. I have check standard task TS30001128 has been used in workitem.
Please sggest.
Also How we can find workflow from TS30001128. Each work item has a workflow id. How we can check it?
Regards
Anutosh

Hello,
To find where a task is used, go to e.g. PFTC_DIS, fill in Standard Task and the task number, click Display, then click on where-used.
For this case, I would look at the user's inbox in SWI5 and then click on the list of workitems to see the workflow log. It should tell you why the workitem is coming back (if he really did refresh).
regards
Rick Bakker
hanabi technology

Enable service of objects -workflow overview-workflow log for IDOCS?

Hi everyone,
I need to enable service of objects -workflow overview-workflow log for IDOCS. Using object key i know how to go to log.Users need that functionality to be enabled for Idocs.For po and pr I can see so its not parameter settings.I feel its configuration somewhere I dont know where?
Can someone help?
Thanks in advance..

Hi VJ,
I'm facing the same issue, the workflow overview is not displaying the log from ME52N. But i have delegate my business object. Is there anything need to be done further.
Thanks & Regards,
Tina

Cannot view workflow log via Services for Object Workflow Overview

We recently had an upgrade of R3/ECC and discovered a new issue. For some reason we can no longer view workflow log via Services for Object > Workflow Overview for Material Master (transaction MM03). We get the message "There are no workflows that have already worked with this object". However, we have confirmed via SWEL and other t-codes that the workflow and log do exist. This seems to be the only object we have this issue for after the upgrade.
Anyone know what issue is and how to fix?   Or at least path to config in SPRO for "generic object services" where we can see if anything changed via upgrade for this object?
Thanks,
Matt
Edited by: Matthew Huth on Apr 22, 2008 9:23 PM

Found the solution. See OSS note 553246. This has been tested and works for us.   -Matt
Note 553246
Summary
Symptom
In the material master, the system no longer displays the attachments for the material or workflow items in the Generic Object Services.
Other terms
MM01, MM02, MM03
Reason and Prerequisites
As of Release 4.6B, business object BUS1001006 is valid for the material master. Until you have implemented Note 452424, the Generic Object Services is still published for the old BUS1001 business object. After implementing the note, all attachments, relationships, notes and workflow items that are assigned to business object BUS1001 are no longer displayed.
Instead, all new attachments are assigned to business object BUS1001006. As a result, attachments cannot exist for both systems.
For workflow items, the assignment to the business object occurs in the respective tasks. It may be very time consuming to convert the business object, depending on whether an individual subtype (assigned to BUS1001) is created.
In other words, after you implement the note, the workflow items for business object BUS1001 can no longer be displayed in the material master.
Solution
With the following correction you can call the Generic Object Services for both business objects. When it is called, the system displays a dialog box in which you can choose the required business object, that is, BUS1001 ('Material') or BUS1001006 ('Standard material').
This correction is delivered as a modification supported by SAP only. This is because the additional option means that attachments can be maintained as required in either of the business objects and users may therefore require extra training.
However, the corrections enable you to display attachments and workflow items for both business objects without the need for a major conversion; this means that you do not get the impression that these have been lost.
Alternatively, as of Release 4.70 (or Basis 6.20) you can, without making a modification, implement method ADD_OBJECTS of BAdI GOS_MULT_PUBLISH for filter attribute WF_OVERVIEW ('Workflow overview'), SRELATIONS ('Relationships') and VIEW_ATTA ('Attachment list'). The implementation should be similar to the following:
METHOD if_ex_gos_mult_publish~add_objects .
DATA:
    ls_lporb TYPE sibflporb.
READ TABLE ct_lporb INTO ls_lporb INDEX 1.
if ls_lporb-typeid = 'BUS1001006'.
    ls_lporb-typeid = 'BUS1001'.
    append ls_lporb to ct_lporb.
endif.
endmethod.

Workflow Escalation Issue

Hi All,
We have many workflows in our project the current issue is related to Escalation.
Manager (Level 1) approve the Employee Leave request then also his work item is escalated to his higher level manager ( level 2).
Could you please guide me or provide me the solution where the problem ? Because I am a beginner to Workflow.

Hi,
(Tip: You might get more responses in the 'SAP Business Workflow' space.)
Use transaction SWI2_FREQ to find an example of a workitem with this issue, then drill into the workflow log (by clicking on the 'scroll' button). It tells you exactly why an item was escalated, and when, and to who.... if you know how to read a workflow log!
From the log, you can also drill down into the workflow builder to see the design of this particular workflow.
cheers
Paul

OER workflow refresh issue

Automation scripting in OER, While working on workflow.xml , I added few more assets and wanted to push them on OER but refreshment on OER console not displaying those new assets and new projects.
I am referring to Oracle Fusion Middleware Configuration Guide for Oracle Enterprise Repository document, Page 247. Section : 9.5.4.1.1 Setting the Community for an Oracle Enterprise Repository Project.
Let me know if anyone face this issue..
Good Luck!! Vishal

Hello,
To find where a task is used, go to e.g. PFTC_DIS, fill in Standard Task and the task number, click Display, then click on where-used.
For this case, I would look at the user's inbox in SWI5 and then click on the list of workitems to see the workflow log. It should tell you why the workitem is coming back (if he really did refresh).
regards
Rick Bakker
hanabi technology

Recipients view in workflow log

Hi all,
Today I noticed that Recipients list in workflow log for a particular task looks different if I log on with two different users.
For example I have a decision step with two possible agents US 00000001 and US 00000002.
If I logon with my user id I see recipients list like this:
Approval process
|--> US 00000001
|--> US 00000002
But If logon with another user id I see recipient list like this:
US 00000001
|--> US 00000002
Do you know if it is something related with configuration?
If yes what should we do to change it?
Thanks!

Thanks for your answers,
I tryed changing WLC parameter Id but it did not worked.
Below I add two screenshots with view differences:
[https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-m2jdjm8X5qU/Tab0sWd6_YI/AAAAAAAAAQs/wEdtyRaF2zA/s288/untitled2.JPG|https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-m2jdjm8X5qU/Tab0sWd6_YI/AAAAAAAAAQs/wEdtyRaF2zA/s288/untitled2.JPG]
[https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-TSg8eQrQ5qg/Tab0sVo8i-I/AAAAAAAAAQw/i220aJIbMIw/s288/untitled1.JPG|https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-TSg8eQrQ5qg/Tab0sVo8i-I/AAAAAAAAAQw/i220aJIbMIw/s288/untitled1.JPG]
Hope someone can help me.
Thanks!

What is the current schedule for 6.1.2 and will it fix the Exchange transaction log issue in 6.1?

Just spent the entire night with virtually no sleep with our firm's group of IT engineers trying to keep our Exchange system online due to massive transaction log growth. Confirmed the issue related to 6.1 calendar bug with Activesync. The workarounds are not practical for large groups of users who depend on their mobile devices for work. Our users have no way of knowing that they are causing an issue so the Apple guidance isnt terribly useful to communicate to 1000 users. When can we expect a resolution? The problem is only going to get worse as more and more users hit the bug. Does anyone know if the issue will resolve as soon as someone installs the 6.1.2 update, assuming that has the fix. Im not trying to bash anyone but this is a very serious problem in enterprise deployments.

The update was released some time today. 6.1.2 appears to specifically fix the Exchange issue causing excess comms and logging issues. However, although the update is available i do not see the notification badge on the Settings icon. Is this controlled by Apple or is there a user setting i am missing somewhere? I would prefer that all users see the badge to expedite user action.

Config certificate and log issues

I config certificate and use it to connect ipsec vpn ， I just config
jinan-neusoft(config)#ip domain-name neusoft.com
jinan-neusoft(config)#crypto key generate rsa general-keys
The name for the keys will be: jinan-neusoft.neusoft.com
Choose the size of the key modulus in the range of 360 to 4096 for your
General Purpose Keys. Choosing a key modulus greater than 512 may take
a few minutes.
How many bits in the modulus [512]:
% Generating 512 bit RSA keys, keys will be non-exportable...
[OK] (elapsed time was 0 seconds)
jinan-neusoft(config)#
Nov 16 01:05:44.435: RSA key size needs to be atleast 768 bits for ssh version 2
jinan-neusoft(config)#
Nov 16 01:05:44.435: %SSH-5-ENABLED: SSH 1.5 has been enabled
jinan-neusoft(config)#crypto pki trustpoint CA1
jinan-neusoft(ca-trustpoint)# enrollment url http://59.44.43.217:80
jinan-neusoft(ca-trustpoint)# revocation-check crl
jinan-neusoft(ca-trustpoint)# rsakeypair DMVPN-SY-KEY
jinan-neusoft(ca-trustpoint)# auto-enrol
jinan-neusoft(config)#crypto pki authenticate CA1
Certificate has the following attributes:
       Fingerprint MD5: D5F9D56B 4D9A4260 43F21D39 811D7AD5
      Fingerprint SHA1: 1E49B228 DD57F4DB 43DD2C2F 03870C18 840DA12A
% Do you accept this certificate? [yes/no]: y
Trustpoint CA certificate accepted.
then I have log issues like below ，even I config auto-enroll , I don t get certificate pending information from my certificate server ，
my device is C3925 and ios is c3900-universalk9-mz.SPA.151-4.M4.bin ，how to deal with it ，top players ， THX~~~~
Nov 16 01:07:54.871: %PKI-6-CERTRENEWAUTO: Renewing the router certificate for trustpoint CA1
Nov 16 01:07:54.951: %CRYPTO-6-AUTOGEN: Generated new 512 bit key pair
Nov 16 01:07:55.115: CRYPTO_PKI: Certificate Request Fingerprint MD5: 939AF8C1 854DDA90 8FE03058 5635468F
Nov 16 01:07:55.115: CRYPTO_PKI: Certificate Request Fingerprint SHA1: 50F869D2 C0814317 7EB2ECC9 90461F3A 353E7089
Nov 16 01:07:55.119: %SYS-3-INVMEMINT: Invalid memory action (malloc) at interrupt level
-Traceback= 5564384z 68B3034z 945A8D0z 6D05DF0z 6
jinan-neusoft(config)#D05F70z 6D06B50z 6D07268z 6D43018z 6D25044z 6D1988Cz 6D4CCE0z 91F0154z 91F0CC4z 91F0DA4z 4ACB9F4z 4127784z
Nov 16 01:07:55.119: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 40 bytes failed from 0x6D05DEC, alignment 0
Pool: Processor Free: 731143916 Cause: Interrupt level allocation
Alternate Pool: None Free: 0 Cause: Interrupt level allocation
-Process= "<interrupt level>", ipl= 3
-Traceback= 5564384z 6892328z 68B3064z 945A8D0z 6D05DF0z 6D05F70z 6D06B50z 6D07268z 6D43018z 6D25044z 6D1988Cz 6D4CCE0z 91F0154z 91F0CC4z 91F0DA4z 4ACB9F4z
Nov 16 01:07:55.119: %SYS-3-INVMEMINT: Invalid memory action (malloc) at interrupt level
-Traceback= 5564384z 68B3034z 945A8D0z 6D05DF0z 6D05F70z 6D06B50z 6D07268z 6D4308Cz 6D25044z 6D1988Cz 6D4CCE0z 91F0154z 91F0CC4z 91F0DA4z 4ACB9F4z 4127784z
jinan-neusoft(config)#
Nov 16 01:08:09.719: %PKI-6-CERTRENEWAUTO: Renewing the router certificate for trustpoint CA1
Nov 16 01:08:09.879: CRYPTO_PKI: Certificate Request Fingerprint MD5: 939AF8C1 854DDA90 8FE03058 5635468F
Nov 16 01:08:09.879: CRYPTO_PKI: Certificate Request Fingerprint SHA1: 50F869D2 C0814317 7EB2ECC9 90461F3A 353E7089
jinan-neusoft(config)#
Nov 16 01:08:09.883: %SYS-3-INVMEMINT: Invalid memory action (malloc) at interrupt level
-Traceback= 5564384z 68B3034z 945A8D0z 6D05DF0z 6D05F70z 6D06B50z 6D07268z 6D43018z 6D25044z 6D1988Cz 6D4CCE0z 91F0154z 91F0CC4z 91F0DA4z 4ACB9F4z 4127784z
Nov 16 01:08:09.883: %SYS-3-INVMEMINT: Invalid memory action (malloc) at interrupt level
-Traceback= 5564384z 68B3034z 945A8D0z 6D05DF0z 6D05F70z 6D06B50z 6D07268z 6D4308Cz 6D25044z 6D1988Cz 6D4CCE0z 91F0154z 91F0CC4z 91F0DA4z 4ACB9F4z 4127784z
jinan-neusoft(config)# Nov 16 01:07:54.871: %PKI-6-CERTRENEWAUTO: Renewing the router certificate for trustpoint CA1
Nov 16 01:07:54.951: %CRYPTO-6-AUTOGEN: Generated new 512 bit key pair
Nov 16 01:07:55.115: CRYPTO_PKI: Certificate Request Fingerprint MD5: 939AF8C1 854DDA90 8FE03058 5635468F
Nov 16 01:07:55.115: CRYPTO_PKI: Certificate Request Fingerprint SHA1: 50F869D2 C0814317 7EB2ECC9 90461F3A 353E7089
Nov 16 01:07:55.119: %SYS-3-INVMEMINT: Invalid memory action (malloc) at interrupt level
-Traceback= 5564384z 68B3034z 945A8D0z 6D05DF0z 6
jinan-neusoft(config)#D05F70z 6D06B50z 6D07268z 6D43018z 6D25044z 6D1988Cz 6D4CCE0z 91F0154z 91F0CC4z 91F0DA4z 4ACB9F4z 4127784z
Nov 16 01:07:55.119: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 40 bytes failed from 0x6D05DEC, alignment 0
Pool: Processor Free: 731143916 Cause: Interrupt level allocation
Alternate Pool: None Free: 0 Cause: Interrupt level allocation
-Process= "<interrupt level>", ipl= 3
-Traceback= 5564384z 6892328z 68B3064z 945A8D0z 6D05DF0z 6D05F70z 6D06B50z 6D07268z 6D43018z 6D25044z 6D1988Cz 6D4CCE0z 91F0154z 91F0CC4z 91F0DA4z 4ACB9F4z
Nov 16 01:07:55.119: %SYS-3-INVMEMINT: Invalid memory action (malloc) at interrupt level
-Traceback= 5564384z 68B3034z 945A8D0z 6D05DF0z 6D05F70z 6D06B50z 6D07268z 6D4308Cz 6D25044z 6D1988Cz 6D4CCE0z 91F0154z 91F0CC4z 91F0DA4z 4ACB9F4z 4127784z
jinan-neusoft(config)#
Nov 16 01:08:09.719: %PKI-6-CERTRENEWAUTO: Renewing the router certificate for trustpoint CA1
Nov 16 01:08:09.879: CRYPTO_PKI: Certificate Request Fingerprint MD5: 939AF8C1 854DDA90 8FE03058 5635468F
Nov 16 01:08:09.879: CRYPTO_PKI: Certificate Request Fingerprint SHA1: 50F869D2 C0814317 7EB2ECC9 90461F3A 353E7089
jinan-neusoft(config)#
Nov 16 01:08:09.883: %SYS-3-INVMEMINT: Invalid memory action (malloc) at interrupt level
-Traceback= 5564384z 68B3034z 945A8D0z 6D05DF0z 6D05F70z 6D06B50z 6D07268z 6D43018z 6D25044z 6D1988Cz 6D4CCE0z 91F0154z 91F0CC4z 91F0DA4z 4ACB9F4z 4127784z
Nov 16 01:08:09.883: %SYS-3-INVMEMINT: Invalid memory action (malloc) at interrupt level
-Traceback= 5564384z 68B3034z 945A8D0z 6D05DF0z 6D05F70z 6D06B50z 6D07268z 6D4308Cz 6D25044z 6D1988Cz 6D4CCE0z 91F0154z 91F0CC4z 91F0DA4z 4ACB9F4z 4127784z
jinan-neusoft(config)#

I do not have the answer but have exactly the same issue, looks as if it is a bug of some kind :
Cisco CISCO3945-CHASSIS (revision 1.0) with C3900-SPE150/K9 with 980992K/67584K bytes of memory.
Processor board ID FCZ163371P3
6 FastEthernet interfaces
3 Gigabit Ethernet interfaces
1 terminal line
1 Virtual Private Network (VPN) Module
DRAM configuration is 72 bits wide with parity enabled.
255K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
250880K bytes of ATA System CompactFlash 0 (Read/Write)
System image file is "flash0:c3900-universalk9-mz.SPA.151-4.M4.bin"
Nov 16 07:37:16.611: CRYPTO_PKI: Signature Certificate Request Fingerprint MD5: 358FF778 7C2E66AE 895BF088 BF022442
.Nov 16 07:37:16.615: CRYPTO_PKI: Signature Certificate Request Fingerprint SHA1: 5F7A4300 20B62132 83D08C6E 2D315DF4 51EFE94D
.Nov 16 07:37:16.623: %SYS-3-INVMEMINT: Invalid memory action (malloc) at interrupt level
-Traceback= 5564384z 68B3034z 945A8D0z 6D05DF0z 6D05F70z 6D06B50z 6D07268z 6D4308Cz 6D25044z 6D1988Cz 6D4CCE0z 91F0154z 91F0CC4z 91F0DA4z 4ACB9F4z 412
7784z
.Nov 16 07:37:16.623: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 72 bytes failed from 0x6D05DEC, alignment 0
Pool: Processor Free: 704933204 Cause: Interrupt level allocation
Alternate Pool: None Free: 0 Cause: Interrupt level allocation
-Process= "", ipl= 3
-Traceback= 5564384z 6892328z 68B3064z 945A8D0z 6D05DF0z 6D05F70z 6D06B50z 6D07268z 6D4308Cz 6D25044z 6D1988Cz 6D4CCE0z 91F0154z 91F0CC4z 91F0DA4z 4AC
B9F4z Nov 16 07:37:16.611: CRYPTO_PKI: Signature Certificate Request Fingerprint MD5: 358FF778 7C2E66AE 895BF088 BF022442
.Nov 16 07:37:16.615: CRYPTO_PKI: Signature Certificate Request Fingerprint SHA1: 5F7A4300 20B62132 83D08C6E 2D315DF4 51EFE94D
.Nov 16 07:37:16.623: %SYS-3-INVMEMINT: Invalid memory action (malloc) at interrupt level
-Traceback= 5564384z 68B3034z 945A8D0z 6D05DF0z 6D05F70z 6D06B50z 6D07268z 6D4308Cz 6D25044z 6D1988Cz 6D4CCE0z 91F0154z 91F0CC4z 91F0DA4z 4ACB9F4z 412
7784z
.Nov 16 07:37:16.623: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 72 bytes failed from 0x6D05DEC, alignment 0
Pool: Processor Free: 704933204 Cause: Interrupt level allocation
Alternate Pool: None Free: 0 Cause: Interrupt level allocation
-Process= "", ipl= 3
-Traceback= 5564384z 6892328z 68B3064z 945A8D0z 6D05DF0z 6D05F70z 6D06B50z 6D07268z 6D4308Cz 6D25044z 6D1988Cz 6D4CCE0z 91F0154z 91F0CC4z 91F0DA4z 4AC
B9F4z

Document change via workflow log.......

Dear all
In our scenario, I am creating a word document in workflow.After creation its going to first level approver for his decision.consider he is not executed the doc.
When I check the status of document from the workflow log(from :Work item executed by me), its allowing me to change the doc.If I made any changes its updating the document,which is already waiting for decision.......Is this correct?Is there any possibilities to restict the document changes from the workflowlog view?
Not only for Word doc.......other doc also.........

I feel you can restrict this by putting some authorization. May be there is something you can restrict in the HOLD Document option.
Thanks
Arghadip

View workflow logs in services for object tab in transaction

HI All ,
Is there any settings that need to be done to see the workflow associated witha particular Tcode in Services for Objects tab.
Actually i want to see the custom workflow logs other than using tcode swi1 .
Regards ,
Sijin K P
Moderator message: not directly related to ABAP development, please see the Workflow forum.
Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Jan 17, 2012

Hi,
You have to implement GOS (Generic Object service).
Plenty of material available for it, you can reffer to meet your requirment.
Regards,
Manish

Error in Workflow log

Hi All,
I have got very little knowledge of workflows thus seeks the help from all of you.
The problem is as folows.
When I execute tcode SWI1 and click on any task it goes to the workflow log. When I click on the details of the workflow so the agents are displayed.But when I click on the object associated to any agent, the system displays and error message 'Error triggering method for Holiday Entitlement' where Holiday Entitlement is the Object associated to an agent.
Please let me know why this error is occuring and how can I resolve it.
Regards

One possibility is insufficient authorization. I probably don't have to tell you how to resolve that.
Another possibility, especially if the workflow has status "Error" is that the object does not have a valid key. I shouldn't have to tell you how to resolve that either. However, if this is the problem, and you need help to resolve it, you should tell us how your workflow is started.
General hints: binding, binding, binding.

Workflow log in error

Hi,
I have one workflow log for ivoice.
It is in error stste in one step. I have restaterd the main workflow using swpr .
Still the workflow is in error.
User wants to complete the workflow in any case. But if I use SWIA then it says that error workflow can not be completed manually.
Please suggest how can i complete the workflow.
egards,
Sandeep

Hello,
Try it with fm SAP_WAPI_ADM_WORKFLOW_CANCEL
regards
Rick Bakker
Hanabi Technology

Parameter file not found in the location as specified by infa workflow log

Hi,
I am unable to find the Parameter file in the location, /u01/obi/inf_svr/server/infa_shared/Temp/SDE_ORA_APTransactionFact_ExpenseDistribution_Full_vxqbGa, as specified in the Informatica workflow log. But Informatica maps are succeeding without any error. Also Parameter file location specified by DAC is different ie /u01/obi/inf_svr/server/infa_shared/SrcFile and proper parameter file exist in this location. Please someone help clarify what is happening here and how the maps are succeeding with the parameter file as specified in th workflow log.

How to configure the task(Informatica workflow) which contains two sessions in it?
Because I found a recommendation that every workflow should have only one session in it and the session name must be same as that of workflow name. But my requirement is, I have to configure a workflow in DAC which contains two sessions in it.
Thanks a lot in advance for all your help sir.

Activity step is not visible in workflow log

Hi All.
I added two task in my workflow and transported it to qualityand it got transpported successfully.
then i triggered the workflow and when i am checking the log
one of my task is not visible in my log.
Please guide me in this.
Thanks in advance
Regards
Anit

I feel like you have to re check the activity steps defintion under the tab Details , in this tab, you have a section Workflow log ---> Graphical represnetation make sure that you hvae selected the In All workflow Logs....
This could be one of the reason that why the workitem is not appearing in the workflow log....
And even under the OUTCOMES tab you have a check box where you can say that if this is the outcome then do not display in the workflow log so please even recheck under the outcomes tab of the activity step if any of the check box is enabled please disable it and then try to reimport to the other system and check...

Workflow Logs Issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for