Workflow not triggered for PR from MRP run

Hi,
I have PR Release strategy workflow configured, working well when i try to create PR manually, triggers workflow.
PR's created thorugh MRP run, triggers release strategy but not workflow.
I checked the event trace 'releasestepcreated' event not triggered through MRP run.
Please respond ASAP.
Your inputs will be highly appreciated.

The response i got from SAP.
Please see note 67866 Purchase req. from materials planning -> no workflow
Thanks,
Indira

Similar Messages

Schedule lines are not coming for HALB after MRP run

Dear All,
I am not getting schedule line after mrp run, inspite of all required setting only purchase requisitions are coming.
Material type is HALB and involve a subcontracting process (30). For raw material I am getting the schedule line but in the case of HALB, it is not coming.
Pls let me know if I am missing something and guide me further on this.
Thanks & Regards
Kundan Kumar

Hi,
In transaction OMDT you have to enable the indicator create schedule lines
In MD02 MRP control Prameter here select the Delivery schedules -3- Schedule line. Processing Key as NETCH and Planning Mode - 3 delted and recreated.
Maintain source list ME01, in that put MRP indicator as '2' i.e. schedule lines via MRP.Put your agreement no in that.
If u run MRP properly u will get schedule lines automatically in ME38.
Make the schedule agreement, make it source relevent in the source list make is FIX and MRP indicator as 3.

Workflow not triggered for BP when start condition's field is set by BADI

Hi guys,
I have created a workflow and given the start Event "Changed" of object BUS1006. In this I have given a start condition which triggers this event when a particular field on transaction BP is populated.
Now the problem is that when I myself explicitly populate the field and press save the workflow is triggered fine, but when I populate that field automatically in a Save BADI (BUPA_GENERAL_UPDATE), the workflow is not triggered. Tcode swel just returns the msg that Start condition returns 'FALSE' for object.
Can someone please help me in this or let me know where I can find its cause in system.
Any help would be really appreciated.
Regards,
Shaili

If this is just one field, create your own custom event and code launching it when saving BP with your field changed.
Maybe event Changed is executed only for changes in GUI.
If you program your own one you will have 100% control of it.
Regards
Radek

Workflow not triggered for BUS2014

Hi experts,
I have created a workflow to send a mail to SAP inbox whenever a contract is created. I have tried using BUS2014 , but workflow is not trigerred. But wen BUS2012 is used WF is trigerred. But this WF sends mail on both PO and contract creation. Is der any other objects to use instead of BUS 2014 ?

Hi,
1)First try to get unique event for your requirement(Only contract creation).
2)If you are not finding any standard unique event find the enhancement point or BTE while saving contract.
3) Create custom event name in ZBUS2014.use this event inside your workflow.Create a same custom event using FM 'SWE_EVENT_CREATE' inside the enhancement point of BTE.
Thanks and regards,
Ragavendran K.

Number Range for PR converted from MRP Run

Dear Experts,
We are experiencing problems with our number range when converting our MRP generated planned orders into PRs. We convert planned orders to purchase requisitions using MD03. We have 1 Plant with 2 MRP Groups which assigned to specific document types and number ranges as well. For example:
In T-code OMI8:
Plant AAAA --> Number Range 1111111111
(Because 1 Plant only able to have 1 number ranges)
In T-code OPPZ:
Plant AAAA, MRP Group : A01--> PR Document Type : ZZZZ
Plant AAAA, MRP Group : A02 --> PR Document Type : XXXX
In T-code SPRO "PR Document Types" and "PR Document Ranges"
PR Document Type : ZZZZ --> Number Ranges 1111111111
PR Document Type : XXXX --> Number Ranges 2222222222
When I run MD03, the result is:
MRP Group : A01 --> PR Document Type : ZZZZ --> Number Ranges : 1111111111
MRP Group : A02 --> PR Document Type : XXXX --> Number Ranges : 1111111111 (Why the number ranges is not 2222222222 ???????)
Does anyone have idea? Please help. Thanks a lot..

Hi Mallinath,
thanks for your info.
Note 46919 has been implemented in the system, and also i have maintain Tcode - OMI3:
* Object Type : 2 (PR) --> PR Document Type : ZZZZ --> Internal number range : 1111111111 --> external number range : " " (blank) --> Reservations : 01
* Object Type : 2 (PR) --> PR Document Type : XXXX--> Internal number range : 2222222222 --> external number range : " " (blank) --> Reservations : 01
But still system pick wrong number ranges (1111111111, instead of 2222222222 ) for PR Document Type XXXX if generated from MRP run.
Do you have any other idea? Thank you.

How to exempt a storage location from MRP run

Hi all,
How do I exempt a storage location and all its materials from MRP run.
I am creating a new storage location and this should not be considered for MRP and no idoc should be generated if a purchase order or a delivery is created from this storage location( should we stop entering this storage location in BD64 filters or anything more to prevent triggering of the idoc).
Can somebody please through some light on these issues.
Kind Regards
Chakradhar
<REMOVED>

Hi
You need to set up master data for that material.In Mrp-4 View set storage location indicator as 1(one) .In this case your storage location stock will be exclude from MRP .
Hope this will help
Dilip

How to exclude the manually create SAP PO from MRP Run?

Dear all
There is this situation that due to the long procurement lead time, certain PO is created manually in SAP in advance based on the sales order enquiry made by customer. (In normal case, we will create a sales order in SAP and then run MRP to create PR to converted to PO)
Most of the time, customer will confirm their enquiry so that we can create sales Order in SAP and this will make it just in time for our raw material to arrive. However, when the PO is created in advance without triggered by MRP caused by Sales Order, this PO booked quantity is often taken up by the consideration of MRP RUN by other sales order. And if later customer confirms their enquiry and there is no PO stock for this due to this stock is already considered by other sales order.
Is there a way that I can exclude the manually create SAP PO from MRP Run?
Please advise.

Dear Csaba Szommer
Thanks for your reply.
Sorry for confusing you.
1. We are in a MAKE TO ORDER (MTO) environment.
2. There is this situation that due to the long procurement lead time, certain PO is created manually in SAP in advance based on
    the sales order enquiry made by customer. (In normal case, we will create a sales order in SAP and then run MRP to create
    PR to converted to PO).
3. Most of the time, customer ABCwill confirm their enquiry so that we can create sales Order in SAP and this will make it just in
    time for our raw material to arrive.
4. However, for the PO that is created in advance (not created by PR triggered by MRP caused by Sales Order), this PO
    On Order Quantity is often taken up by the consideration of MRP RUN by other sales orders.
5. It creates problem that if later this customer ABC confirms his enquiry and we create SAP Sales Order in the system, the
    stock of PO created previously is already eaten up by other sales orders.
We are using MTO and do not use Forecast. And MTO Strategy is set at the material master level and as such I do not think we can simply modify the MRP Strategy to suit this unique case, as for the very same material, in one PO it should be considered by MRP but in another PO, it should be excluded from MRP Run.
Is there a way that I can exclude the manually create SAP PO (for the case of Customer ABC email enquiry without creating Sales Order in the System first) from MRP Run?

Production orders not to be considered during MRP run

Dear SAPeers,
i want to know how to ensure that open production orders are not considered during the MRP run.
the following is the scenario.
PIR for march after MRP run creates a planned order. this planned order is converted to production order. now this production order is processed but not completely confirmed and TECOed after a certain quantity has been produced.
now we delete the old PIR and create a new PIR in the next month. now we revoke the TECO status of the production order and run MRP. I want to know how to avoid MRP from considering the open production order and create planned order for the complete PIR quantity.
Thanks and Regards
Srinivasan

Srini,
what i am worried is shortfall of raw materials in case they were to open the production order in the current month after the planning has been done. how do we allocate raw materials for both the plan as well as the open production order?
Okay, you presumably had RM available for all of your production orders (and those RM were balanced by the reservations from the production orders). Now, you TECO the production order. In effect, any un-issued RM are now released and freely available for other orders/planned orders. Now you plan the following month. Those RM that were freed can and will be used for the new plan. Odd business process, but OK. Now, you re-open the production orders, and, yes, you will have a shortage unless you run RM MRP again. This is, ah, inconsistent with any business process I have ever seen.
The question that jumps to mind is, "Why re-open the old production orders at all? Alternatively, why were they TECOd in the first place?" If one knows that he intends to complete an order in production, one does not normally TECO the order, and then later reverse the TECO.
With respect to my name, I must unfortunately keep a low profile. Ever since I escaped from the mental institution, the thought-police have been hunting for me. I do not wish to be the recipient of any further electroshock 'treatments'.
Rgds,
DB49

Excluding storage location from MRP run in Long Term Planning

Hi,friends,
In my scenario , i want to exclude storage location from MRP run in long term planning.When i set storage location MRP indicator "2" in SPRO and SLoc MRP indicator "1" MRP4 in material master, i can exclude the storage location after run MRP with MD01/MD02,and i can see the expected result in MD04.But in Long Term Planning scenario the storage location can not be excluded after run MRP with MS01/MS02,and the requirements list in MS04 include the stock in the storage location i want to exclude. i dont know if i miss something.Plz give me some advice.
Regards
Joey

Hi,
Refer the OSS Note 208017 - LTP: Long-term planning and storage locations
==========================================================================
Symptom
In long-term planning (Transactions MSBT / MS01 / MS02 / MS03), the MRP indicator of a storage location for a material is not taken into account (material master, view MRP 2 [up to and including Release 3.1I] or MRP 4 [as of Release 4.0A]).
The storage locations excluded by MRP or planned separately are also planned in the plant segment.
Additional key words
LTP, MM01, MM02, MM03, master data, MRP indicator, LGORT ...
Cause and prerequisites
The MRP indicator for a certain storage location of a material is only taken into account in operative planning (requirements planning, MRP).
The long-term planning occurs exclusively at plant level.
Solution
This is no error. The system works as intended.
The individual storage locations should not be distinguished in the long-term planning, in order to perform a comprehensive long-term planning.
This is important, for example, within the kanban processing where the storage locations with kanban MRP are excluded from the MRP, but in spite of that should be included in the long-term planning.
==========================================================================
Regards,
Siva

MRP-Exclude STO document type from MRP Run

Hi,
I want to exclude STO document type from MRP run, so that STO Open qty will not be considered as open qty while doing MRP.
I have checked below settings but didn't worked.
1. In OMI8 - I have unchecked "Stock in Transfer"
2. SPRO->Materials Management->Consumption-based Planning->Planning->Define torage Location MRP per plant
     Here I have excluded ONE storage location from MRP and same storage location has been used in the STO.
Can anyone know how to resolve this ?
Regards,
Rakesh

Rakesh,
Yes, they will not be relevant for MRP. Neither will anything else in that storage location. However, the setting is not in configuration, but in the material master (MRP4 tab).
The configuration setting you mentioned has no impact on existing material masters, it is only used to determine the default settings for newly created storage location entries for a material/plant..
You can set a particular material/plant/stlocn to be irrelevant for MRP. This relevancy is irrespective of document type, it can be a STO, a purchase req, a sales order, a production order, or it could be stock (inventory) - all supply and demand in this material/plant/stlocn are excluded from MRP processing.
MRP relevancy of storage location is set at the material/plant/storage location level in the material master.
If you do not wish to exclude a storage location from MRP, then you will have to find another way to make your STOs Irrelevant for MRP. As I said earlier, STOs (like any other Purchase orders that are configured to process stock ), are generally considered to be relevant for MRP.
If you were a client, I would suggest that you rethink your business model that drives this requirement.
If the business model cannot be altered, and the storage location solution is unacceptable, then you will be stuck with a customized solution.
Best Regards,
DB49

Storage location to be excluded from MRP Run

Dear Gurus ,
We are trying to exclude perticular Storage location from MRP Run with the Configuration setting
IMG >>> Production >>>.MRP >>>.Planning >>>>.Define Storage Location MRP per plant >>>> Indicator 1 is set
Still the Stock is being considered
As I know this can be done thr' MRP4 view , but we don't want to go Part No wise ,
Suggest better sloution
Thanx in advance

Vasu,
Above IMG path is only used for defulting the storage location exclusion in material master.
Whenever materials are extended to this storage nlocation in mm01 or mmsc, this defult value would be proposed automatically .
However this does not mean setting it in IMG would change existing materia storage location extensions automatically. Also MRP will not pick from above IMG settings.
Once again above setting is only valid from defulting the values while extending the Materials to storage locations.
Hope it helps.

Workflow not triggered..in client server

Hi Friends..
i have developed one workflow for po release in local system it works fine..
But i developed the same workflow in client system it was not triggered..
i checked in swue the event was triggered perfectly..
But the workflow not triggered.. if i click the workflow overview in me23n it shows
"there are no workflows that are already worked with this object" so i dont know why this problem..' occur.. this problem arises at the time time of development in local system.. but now it was cleared..at that time release strategy not maintained.. but now release strategy also maintained.. but i dont know the exact reason and how can i solve this kind of issue...
so anyone help me..urgent issue..
Thanks in advance
Gowrishankar

What is the message that you are getting for the event? Is it "No receiver entered" or something else?
Check for the event linkage between your event and workflow in SWE2. If it is not set select the checkbox "Linkage Activated" and acitivate the linkage and then try to trigger the event.
If your event linkage gets deactivated everytime you try to trigger the event, there could be some problem in binding from your event to workflow container. Check if all mandatory parameters in workflow receive data from event container.
Thanks,
Prasath N

Exclusion of Stock Transport specific MRP Elements from MRP Run

Hi,
How can we exclude specific MRP Elements from planning?
I want to exclude the MRP elements like - Ord.DS, PRqRel, PlORel etc from MRP run.
(After MRP run, they should only be displayed in MD04 and not planned)
MRP run should treat all other MRP elements normally.
Warm Regards,
Madhavi.

I think I understand what you want to do, and I think it is not possible without some major MODIFICATIONS, because it goes against the grain of what MRP is supposed to do: balance demand and supply.
One thing you might consider as a possible work-around: create a "virtual plant" say 5000, that is a plant that isn't really used for anything. Then point your special procurement keys in plant 2000 to plant 5000. This is where you then get the purchase req releases etc, and they will not affect plant 1000.
This doesn't require modifications... but it will also not display the elements in MD04 for plant 1000.
Just an idea...

STO Not to be considered in MRP Run in MTS

Dear All,
We are facing the following problem in MRP run in MTS scenario when
there are STOs in Plant.
We have 2 Plants one is production Plant (Say A) and other is Non
production Plant (Say B) from where only Deliveries will be made.
Now after final material will be produced in Plant A it will be routed
through Stock transport order (STO) to plant B.
So there will be always STOs in Plant A which will be created in Plant B.
Now we are using Strategy 11 (Gross req. Planning) for Final FERT material.
In MRP if we have PIR of 100 Qty. and STO of 50 Qty. system is creating
the Planned order of 150 quantity which is a normal system behavior.
Now our requirement is that it should not include STO in Planning (MRP Run).
Pls. Suggest.
Regards,
Vinayak.

Hi,
Go to OPJJ,
In that select your requirement type, and click details...
there is a tab,IN/OUTward movement.. In that deselect the box for incl.rel.order.reqs..
If you dont want the deliveries to be taken into consideration, then uncheck thebox for include deliveries..
hope this solves..
karthick

Excluding PO from MRP Run

Dear All,
I have one requirement that i want to exclude one PO document type( Developements PO) From MRP Run. How can i do this.
Kindly Help
Regards
Sunil

Hi,
My scenario is that when a new vendor is developed for Procurement of a existing material then at first Developement Purchase Order is raised against that vendor. After finalisation of vendor standard PO is raised against that vendor. For a material which is being Procured from some vendor there will be Regular Purchase Order, now i need more vendor for that Material then I will raise Developement PO against those vendor, then on Finalisation of vendor i will start raising regular PO for that vendor. In MRP run this Developement PO quantity should not be considered as receipt element
Regards
Sunil

Workflow not triggered for PR from MRP run

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for