Workflows and UWL

Hi All,
There is a step in the worklfow where i am sending a mail to user's SAP inbox.But i want that instead of the mail going to the user's SAP Inbox it should be delivered to the portal's UWL.
Kindly help regarding the same.
TIA.
Regards,
Richa Sinha

Hi Richa,
check this
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/d6/eddef503944dc6bbe8d81a2cec44e8/frameset.htm
Thanks & Regards
Hari Sankar M

Similar Messages

  • MDM Workflows and UWL in CE 7.11

    Hello,
    I am working with MDM Workflows and UWL in CE 7.11.
    For configuring the UWL, we need to set some property of MDM Result Set iView to
    connect and display MDM workflows for an MDM repository in EP 7.0.
    But in CE 7.11 the concept of Result Set iView is replaced by ResultSet component which we use as a used component in the custom wrapper (DC).
    How to use ResultSet component  to configure UWL in CE 7.11 ?
    Thanks in Advance..
    Regards,
    Yogita.

    Hi Yogita,
    Here is a document for you.l  It shows how to configure MDM & BPM.  From within this there is information in regards to the Universal Worklist:
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/50d7ad1f-6b27-2d10-448e-9c115ce7f5b3?
    You may also want to raise a post for this in MDM forum.
    Beth Maben
    EP - Senior Support Consultant
    AGS Primary Support, Business Suite & Technology
    Please see the UWL Wiki @
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/wiki?path=/display/bpx/uwl+faq  ***

  • Time mismatch between BSP workflow and UWL in portal

    Hi All,
    I am using a portal application where ,for the same work iteam ,BSP workflow and UWL in portal are displaying two different date and time.
    Has anybody come accross the same issue?
    Need your help.
    Regards
    Rajib

    Hello,
    There might be some mismatch of attributes between BSP workflow and UWL configuration.Please check the UWL configuration file and check the display attribute name. Please check UWL configuration guide for more details
    Jojo

  • MDM workflows and UWL

    Hello,
    We have recently upgraded ourselves to MDM 5.5 SP4 Patch pack 4. This patch pack was intended to solve an earlier problem we faced when integrating Universal Worklist (UWL) with MDM.
    Earlier the UWL would return error in case the MDM workflows had worklfow jobs which the user had to not "Accepted". If the user "Accepts" it using MDM Data Manager, then the record would appear on the UWL.
    I wish to know how we can configure the "Accept" button on the UWL, so that the user sees all the "Available" workflows and can "Accept" the workflow job which he plans to work upon.
    Thanks in advance,
    PKS.

    Hi Yogita,
    Here is a document for you.l  It shows how to configure MDM & BPM.  From within this there is information in regards to the Universal Worklist:
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/50d7ad1f-6b27-2d10-448e-9c115ce7f5b3?
    You may also want to raise a post for this in MDM forum.
    Beth Maben
    EP - Senior Support Consultant
    AGS Primary Support, Business Suite & Technology
    Please see the UWL Wiki @
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/wiki?path=/display/bpx/uwl+faq  ***

  • How to invoke Workflow and UWL through Webdynpro for Java

    Hi,
    In my Development Component there are three applications .The requirement is that the data will flow between one application to another only through workflow in
    UWL.
    Can anybody help me out as to how to invoke workflow programatically from Webdynpro for Java .
    After data goes from one application to workflow UWL, how the second application will work on it . If possible please send me the links of some tutorials .
    I searched in Webdynpro Tutorials site but there are no tutorials available there .
    Thanks a lot .

    Hi,
    Check the following Threads,U will get lot of details......
    WebDynpro application that can work with SAP workflow work items?
    /thread/142477 [original link is broken]
    Configuring UWL with WebDynpro
    /people/niharika.jeena/blog/2006/06/06/launching-webdynpro-from-universal-worklist
    Sample Application,
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/xi/how%20to%20configure%20the%20universal%20worklist.pdf

  • Workflow and UWL

    Hi.
    Workitems are not started from UWL.
    Please help me to configure UWL.

    Hi,
    See this link. There are four further link inside. But you select the last one i.e. Universal Worklist in which you will get the 'How to configure Universal Worklist'.
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/advancedsearch?cat=sdn_media&query=uwl&adv=false&sortby=cm_rnd_rankvalue#
    Regards,
    Manorama Singh
    Reward points if helpful answer.

  • Appraisal workflow in UWL

    Hello all,
    I am trying to create a new view in UWL for appraisal workflows.
    My requirement is to get the Appraisal workflows into UWL. However, when appraisal item is selected from UWL it should not take us to the appraisal form, instead it should display the details view (the one which is displayed in the item preview) in pop-up.
    I created new configuration and for task 'TS12300096' in UWL configuration and selected 'UWL view detail' as action launcher when clicked on the workitem in UWL.
    When i open the UWL iView, there are no items related to appraisal task mentioned above are visible and if i delete the configuration file for the task which i've created, it appears.
    Below are the configuration files:
    1. com.appraisee_chge: configuration file for workitem registration
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <!DOCTYPE UWLConfiguration PUBLIC '-//SAP//UWL1.0//EN' 'uwl_configuration.dtd'
      >
    <UWLConfiguration version="1.0">
      <ItemTypes>
        <ItemType name="uwl.taskTS12300096.SAP_ECC_HumanResources" connector="WebFlowConnector" defaultView="uwl.taskTS12300096.SAP_ECC_HumanResources_view" defaultAction="defaultAction">
          <ItemTypeCriteria systemId="SAP_ECC_HumanResources" externalType="TS12300096" connector="WebFlowConnector"/>
          <CustomAttributes>
            <CustomAttributeSource id="ABAP_BOR" objectIdHolder="externalObjectId" objectType="APPR_DOC" cacheValidity="default">
              <Attribute name="DOCUMENTNAME" type="string" displayName="Document Name"/>
              <Attribute name="ID" type="string" displayName="Apprasisal ID"/>
            </CustomAttributeSource>
          </CustomAttributes>
          <Actions>
            <Action name="defaultAction" groupAction="" handler="UIActionHandler" returnToDetailViewAllowed="yes" launchInNewWindow="no">
              <Descriptions default="defaultAction"/>
            </Action>
          </Actions>
        </ItemType>
      </ItemTypes>
      <Views>
        <View name="uwl.taskTS12300096.SAP_ECC_HumanResources_view" selectionMode="SINGLESELECT" width="98%" supportedItemTypes="uwl.task" columnOrder="subject, isEscalated, creatorId, createdDate, priority, attachmentCount, dueDate, status, DOCUMENTNAME, ID" sortby="priority:desc, dueDate:asc, createdDate:desc" tableDesign="STANDARD" visibleRowCount="10" headerVisible="no" queryRange="undefined" tableNavigationFooterVisible="yes" tableNavigationType="CUSTOMNAV" actionRef="" refresh="300" dueDateSevere="86400000" dueDateWarning="259200000" emphasizedItems="new" displayOnlyDefinedAttributes="yes" dynamicCreationAllowed="yes" actionPosition="bottom" referenceBundle="tasks">
          <DisplayAttributes>
            <DisplayAttribute name="createdDate" type="date" width="" sortable="yes" format="medium" referenceBundle="sent_date" hAlign="LEFT" vAlign="BASELINE" maxTextWidth="0" headerVisible="yes"/>
            <DisplayAttribute name="escalatedBy" type="people" width="" sortable="yes" format="default" referenceBundle="escalated_by" hAlign="LEFT" vAlign="BASELINE" maxTextWidth="0" headerVisible="yes"/>
            <DisplayAttribute name="attachmentCount" type="int" width="1" sortable="yes" format="default" referenceBundle="attachments" hAlign="CENTER" vAlign="BASELINE" maxTextWidth="0" headerVisible="no"/>
            <DisplayAttribute name="statusIcon" type="image" width="1" sortable="yes" format="default" referenceBundle="status_image" hAlign="LEFT" vAlign="BASELINE" maxTextWidth="0" headerVisible="no">
              <ImageMapping default="enum">
                <ImageMap value="EXECUTED" imageName="ico16_task_confirmed.gif" referenceBundle="confirmed_task_status"/>
                <ImageMap value="COMPLETED" imageName="ico16_task_complete.gif"/>
                <ImageMap value="INPROGRESS" imageName="ico16_task_start.gif" referenceBundle="start_task_status"/>
                <ImageMap value="enum" imageName="ico16_task_new.gif" referenceBundle="new_task_status"/>
                <ImageMap value="NEW" imageName="ico16_task_new.gif" referenceBundle="new_task_status"/>
              </ImageMapping>
            </DisplayAttribute>
            <DisplayAttribute name="substitutedFor" type="people" width="" sortable="yes" format="default" referenceBundle="substituted_for" hAlign="LEFT" vAlign="BASELINE" maxTextWidth="0" headerVisible="yes"/>
            <DisplayAttribute name="dueDate" type="date" width="" sortable="yes" format="medium" referenceBundle="due_date" hAlign="LEFT" vAlign="BASELINE" maxTextWidth="0" headerVisible="yes"/>
            <DisplayAttribute name="status" type="string" width="" sortable="yes" format="default" referenceBundle="status" hAlign="LEFT" vAlign="BASELINE" maxTextWidth="0" headerVisible="yes"/>
            <DisplayAttribute name="isEscalated" type="image" width="10" sortable="yes" format="default" referenceBundle="data_escalate" hAlign="LEFT" vAlign="BASELINE" maxTextWidth="0" headerVisible="no">
              <ImageMapping default="0">
                <ImageMap value="0" imageName="">
                  <Descriptions default=""/>
                </ImageMap>
                <ImageMap value="1" imageName="ico16_escalated.gif" referenceBundle="data_escalated"/>
              </ImageMapping>
            </DisplayAttribute>
            <DisplayAttribute name="creatorId" type="people" width="" sortable="yes" format="default" referenceBundle="from" hAlign="LEFT" vAlign="BASELINE" maxTextWidth="0" headerVisible="yes"/>
            <DisplayAttribute name="memoCount" type="int" width="1" sortable="yes" format="default" referenceBundle="memo" hAlign="CENTER" vAlign="BASELINE" maxTextWidth="0" headerVisible="no"/>
            <DisplayAttribute name="itemTypeIcon" type="image" width="1" sortable="no" format="default" referenceBundle="item_type" hAlign="LEFT" vAlign="BASELINE" maxTextWidth="0" headerVisible="no">
              <ImageMapping default="none">
                <ImageMap value="uwl.task" imageName="task.gif" referenceBundle="tasks"/>
                <ImageMap value="none" imageName="">
                  <Descriptions default=""/>
                </ImageMap>
                <ImageMap value="uwl.notification" imageName="notification.gif" referenceBundle="task_notifications"/>
                <ImageMap value="uwl.alert" imageName="alert.gif" referenceBundle="task_alerts"/>
              </ImageMapping>
            </DisplayAttribute>
            <DisplayAttribute name="systemId" type="string" width="10" sortable="yes" format="default" referenceBundle="system_id" hAlign="LEFT" vAlign="BASELINE" maxTextWidth="0" headerVisible="yes"/>
            <DisplayAttribute name="isLaunched" type="image" width="1" sortable="no" format="default" referenceBundle="launched" hAlign="LEFT" vAlign="BASELINE" maxTextWidth="0" headerVisible="no">
              <ImageMapping default="0">
                <ImageMap value="0" imageName="1x1.gif" referenceBundle="not_launched"/>
                <ImageMap value="1" imageName="/irj/portalapps/com.sap.portal.htmlb/mimes/common/statusicons/s_sta_ok.gif" referenceBundle="is_launched"/>
              </ImageMapping>
            </DisplayAttribute>
            <DisplayAttribute name="DOCUMENTNAME" type="string" sortable="no" maxTextWidth="0" headerVisible="yes">
              <Descriptions default="Document Name"/>
            </DisplayAttribute>
            <DisplayAttribute name="subject" type="link" width="" sortable="yes" format="default" actionRef="viewDetail" referenceBundle="subject" hAlign="LEFT" vAlign="BASELINE" maxTextWidth="0" headerVisible="yes"/>
            <DisplayAttribute name="priority" type="string" width="10" sortable="yes" format="default" referenceBundle="priority" hAlign="LEFT" vAlign="BASELINE" maxTextWidth="0" headerVisible="yes">
              <Menu>
                <MenuItem name="Low" actionRef="priorityLow" referenceBundle="menu_priority_low"/>
                <MenuItem name="Normal" actionRef="priorityNormal" referenceBundle="menu_priority_normal"/>
                <MenuItem name="High" actionRef="priorityHigh" referenceBundle="menu_priority_high"/>
                <MenuItem name="VeryHigh" actionRef="priorityVeryHigh" referenceBundle="menu_priority_v_high"/>
              </Menu>
            </DisplayAttribute>
            <DisplayAttribute name="ID" type="string" sortable="no" maxTextWidth="0" headerVisible="yes">
              <Descriptions default="Apprasisal ID"/>
            </DisplayAttribute>
          </DisplayAttributes>
          <AllowedFilters>
            <CompoundExpression logicalOperation="AND" defaultViewFilter="yes" referenceBundle="filter_display_all"/>
            <CompoundExpression logicalOperation="AND" defaultViewFilter="no" referenceBundle="filter_new">
              <Expression name="status" value="NEW" comparator="Equals"/>
            </CompoundExpression>
            <CompoundExpression logicalOperation="AND" defaultViewFilter="no" referenceBundle="filter_inprogress">
              <Expression name="status" value="INPROGRESS" comparator="Equals"/>
            </CompoundExpression>
            <CompoundExpression logicalOperation="AND" defaultViewFilter="no" referenceBundle="filter_duetoday">
              <Expression name="dueDate" value="Today" comparator="Equals"/>
            </CompoundExpression>
            <CompoundExpression logicalOperation="AND" defaultViewFilter="no" referenceBundle="filter_overdue">
              <Expression name="dueDate" value="Today" comparator="LessThan"/>
            </CompoundExpression>
          </AllowedFilters>
          <Actions>
            <Action reference="defaultGlobalWizard"/>
            <Action reference="addToNavigation"/>
            <Action reference="removeFromNavigation"/>
          </Actions>
        </View>
      </Views>
    </UWLConfiguration>
    2. com.appraisee_chge.TS12300096.wiz - What action to be triggered when an item is selected in UWL:
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <!DOCTYPE UWLConfiguration PUBLIC '-//SAP//UWL1.0//EN' 'uwl_configuration.dtd'
      >
    <UWLConfiguration version="1.0">
      <ItemTypes>
        <ItemType name="uwl.taskTS12300096.SAP_ECC_HumanResources" connector="WebFlowConnector" defaultView="uwl.taskTS12300096.SAP_ECC_HumanResources_view" defaultAction="defaultAction" executionMode="default">
          <ItemTypeCriteria systemId="SAP_ECC_HumanResources" externalType="TS12300096" connector="WebFlowConnector"/>
          <CustomAttributes>
            <CustomAttributeSource id="ABAP_BOR" objectIdHolder="externalObjectId" objectType="APPR_DOC" cacheValidity="default">
              <Attribute name="DOCUMENTNAME" type="string" displayName="Document Name"/>
              <Attribute name="ID" type="string" displayName="Apprasisal ID"/>
            </CustomAttributeSource>
          </CustomAttributes>
          <Actions>
            <Action name="defaultAction" groupAction="" handler="UIActionHandler" returnToDetailViewAllowed="yes" launchInNewWindow="no">
              <Descriptions default="defaultAction"/>
            </Action>
          </Actions>
        </ItemType>
      </ItemTypes>
      <Views>
        <View name="uwl.taskTS12300096.SAP_ECC_HumanResources_view" selectionMode="SINGLESELECT" width="98%" supportedItemTypes="uwl.task" columnOrder="subject, isEscalated, creatorId, createdDate, priority, attachmentCount, dueDate, status, DOCUMENTNAME, ID" sortby="priority:desc, dueDate:asc, createdDate:desc" tableDesign="STANDARD" visibleRowCount="10" headerVisible="no" queryRange="undefined" tableNavigationFooterVisible="yes" tableNavigationType="CUSTOMNAV" actionRef="" refresh="300" dueDateSevere="86400000" dueDateWarning="259200000" emphasizedItems="new" displayOnlyDefinedAttributes="yes" dynamicCreationAllowed="yes" actionPosition="bottom" referenceBundle="tasks">
          <DisplayAttributes>
            <DisplayAttribute name="createdDate" type="date" width="" sortable="yes" format="medium" referenceBundle="sent_date" hAlign="LEFT" vAlign="BASELINE" maxTextWidth="0" headerVisible="yes"/>
            <DisplayAttribute name="escalatedBy" type="people" width="" sortable="yes" format="default" referenceBundle="escalated_by" hAlign="LEFT" vAlign="BASELINE" maxTextWidth="0" headerVisible="yes"/>
            <DisplayAttribute name="attachmentCount" type="int" width="1" sortable="yes" format="default" referenceBundle="attachments" hAlign="CENTER" vAlign="BASELINE" maxTextWidth="0" headerVisible="no"/>
            <DisplayAttribute name="statusIcon" type="image" width="1" sortable="yes" format="default" referenceBundle="status_image" hAlign="LEFT" vAlign="BASELINE" maxTextWidth="0" headerVisible="no">
              <ImageMapping default="enum">
                <ImageMap value="EXECUTED" imageName="ico16_task_confirmed.gif" referenceBundle="confirmed_task_status"/>
                <ImageMap value="COMPLETED" imageName="ico16_task_complete.gif"/>
                <ImageMap value="INPROGRESS" imageName="ico16_task_start.gif" referenceBundle="start_task_status"/>
                <ImageMap value="enum" imageName="ico16_task_new.gif" referenceBundle="new_task_status"/>
                <ImageMap value="NEW" imageName="ico16_task_new.gif" referenceBundle="new_task_status"/>
              </ImageMapping>
            </DisplayAttribute>
            <DisplayAttribute name="substitutedFor" type="people" width="" sortable="yes" format="default" referenceBundle="substituted_for" hAlign="LEFT" vAlign="BASELINE" maxTextWidth="0" headerVisible="yes"/>
            <DisplayAttribute name="dueDate" type="date" width="" sortable="yes" format="medium" referenceBundle="due_date" hAlign="LEFT" vAlign="BASELINE" maxTextWidth="0" headerVisible="yes"/>
            <DisplayAttribute name="status" type="string" width="" sortable="yes" format="default" referenceBundle="status" hAlign="LEFT" vAlign="BASELINE" maxTextWidth="0" headerVisible="yes"/>
            <DisplayAttribute name="isEscalated" type="image" width="10" sortable="yes" format="default" referenceBundle="data_escalate" hAlign="LEFT" vAlign="BASELINE" maxTextWidth="0" headerVisible="no">
              <ImageMapping default="0">
                <ImageMap value="0" imageName="">
                  <Descriptions default=""/>
                </ImageMap>
                <ImageMap value="1" imageName="ico16_escalated.gif" referenceBundle="data_escalated"/>
              </ImageMapping>
            </DisplayAttribute>
            <DisplayAttribute name="creatorId" type="people" width="" sortable="yes" format="default" referenceBundle="from" hAlign="LEFT" vAlign="BASELINE" maxTextWidth="0" headerVisible="yes"/>
            <DisplayAttribute name="memoCount" type="int" width="1" sortable="yes" format="default" referenceBundle="memo" hAlign="CENTER" vAlign="BASELINE" maxTextWidth="0" headerVisible="no"/>
            <DisplayAttribute name="itemTypeIcon" type="image" width="1" sortable="no" format="default" referenceBundle="item_type" hAlign="LEFT" vAlign="BASELINE" maxTextWidth="0" headerVisible="no">
              <ImageMapping default="none">
                <ImageMap value="uwl.task" imageName="task.gif" referenceBundle="tasks"/>
                <ImageMap value="none" imageName="">
                  <Descriptions default=""/>
                </ImageMap>
                <ImageMap value="uwl.notification" imageName="notification.gif" referenceBundle="task_notifications"/>
                <ImageMap value="uwl.alert" imageName="alert.gif" referenceBundle="task_alerts"/>
              </ImageMapping>
            </DisplayAttribute>
            <DisplayAttribute name="systemId" type="string" width="10" sortable="yes" format="default" referenceBundle="system_id" hAlign="LEFT" vAlign="BASELINE" maxTextWidth="0" headerVisible="yes"/>
            <DisplayAttribute name="isLaunched" type="image" width="1" sortable="no" format="default" referenceBundle="launched" hAlign="LEFT" vAlign="BASELINE" maxTextWidth="0" headerVisible="no">
              <ImageMapping default="0">
                <ImageMap value="0" imageName="1x1.gif" referenceBundle="not_launched"/>
                <ImageMap value="1" imageName="/irj/portalapps/com.sap.portal.htmlb/mimes/common/statusicons/s_sta_ok.gif" referenceBundle="is_launched"/>
              </ImageMapping>
            </DisplayAttribute>
            <DisplayAttribute name="DOCUMENTNAME" type="string" sortable="no" maxTextWidth="0" headerVisible="yes">
              <Descriptions default="Document Name"/>
            </DisplayAttribute>
            <DisplayAttribute name="subject" type="link" width="" sortable="yes" format="default" actionRef="viewDetail" referenceBundle="subject" hAlign="LEFT" vAlign="BASELINE" maxTextWidth="0" headerVisible="yes"/>
            <DisplayAttribute name="priority" type="string" width="10" sortable="yes" format="default" referenceBundle="priority" hAlign="LEFT" vAlign="BASELINE" maxTextWidth="0" headerVisible="yes">
              <Menu>
                <MenuItem name="Low" actionRef="priorityLow" referenceBundle="menu_priority_low"/>
                <MenuItem name="Normal" actionRef="priorityNormal" referenceBundle="menu_priority_normal"/>
                <MenuItem name="High" actionRef="priorityHigh" referenceBundle="menu_priority_high"/>
                <MenuItem name="VeryHigh" actionRef="priorityVeryHigh" referenceBundle="menu_priority_v_high"/>
              </Menu>
            </DisplayAttribute>
            <DisplayAttribute name="ID" type="string" sortable="no" maxTextWidth="0" headerVisible="yes">
              <Descriptions default="Apprasisal ID"/>
            </DisplayAttribute>
          </DisplayAttributes>
          <AllowedFilters>
            <CompoundExpression logicalOperation="AND" defaultViewFilter="yes" referenceBundle="filter_display_all"/>
            <CompoundExpression logicalOperation="AND" defaultViewFilter="no" referenceBundle="filter_new">
              <Expression name="status" value="NEW" comparator="Equals"/>
            </CompoundExpression>
            <CompoundExpression logicalOperation="AND" defaultViewFilter="no" referenceBundle="filter_inprogress">
              <Expression name="status" value="INPROGRESS" comparator="Equals"/>
            </CompoundExpression>
            <CompoundExpression logicalOperation="AND" defaultViewFilter="no" referenceBundle="filter_duetoday">
              <Expression name="dueDate" value="Today" comparator="Equals"/>
            </CompoundExpression>
            <CompoundExpression logicalOperation="AND" defaultViewFilter="no" referenceBundle="filter_overdue">
              <Expression name="dueDate" value="Today" comparator="LessThan"/>
            </CompoundExpression>
          </AllowedFilters>
          <Actions>
            <Action reference="defaultGlobalWizard"/>
            <Action reference="addToNavigation"/>
            <Action reference="removeFromNavigation"/>
          </Actions>
        </View>
      </Views>
    </UWLConfiguration>
    Any suggestions or inputs appreciated.
    Thanks
    Karthik
    Edited by: Karthik on Feb 21, 2008 1:21 AM

    Issue Resolved

  • How to implement workflow without UWL in portal?

    Hi,
    Our project has a requirement where we have to implement workflow. We need to display notifications and workitems(approve or reject) in the enterprise portal. The problem is that the client says we cannot use UWL as its their policy.
    My question is whether it is possible to create a workflow and execute the tasks in the portal without UWL. Is there any alternative like connectors or third party tools etc? please help asap

    Hi Gokul,
    I had faced the same issue in my project.
    In case you aren't able to use UWL you could directly call the transaction associated with SBWP(Sap Business WorkPlace) in the portal by calling the link associated with transaction SBWP.
    for example in my case instead of Portal I had to work in BSP wherein I used this method by directly calling the link associated with SBWP.
    the link as was used by me is:-
    http://SAP Servername.com:8001/sap/bc/gui/sap/its/webgui/!?sap-client=100&sap-user=sapuserid&sap-password=saplogin password&~transaction=sbwp
    please note that you need change in the server name after Http:// in my case the server name was blrkecisbank.ad.infosys.com in your case it will be different. so try it out from your end and let me know whether you were able to get results.
    Edited by: Rajwin Singh Sood on Jan 20, 2009 9:37 AM
    Edited by: Rajwin Singh Sood on Jan 20, 2009 9:38 AM
    Edited by: Rajwin Singh Sood on Jan 20, 2009 9:38 AM

  • Workflow to UWL to ABAP WebDynpro ( Binding not happening)

    Hi All,
    I have created Workflow which need to be executed from UWL.
    The workitem in UWL will call a ABAP Web Dynpro application for approval Process.
    I have registered the my Task in SWFVISU and Maintained the necessary settings (Even Re-registered the new task in UWL ).
    When I click the workitem in UWL it successfully calls the ABAP webDynpro application.
    But the Parameter WORKITEM id is not transfered from workflow to Web Dynpro Application.
    I have created a parameter WORKITEMID in the Workflow and populating it at runtime. But the same is not being passed to WebDynpro Import Parameter.
    I see that WORKITEMID is initial at runtime while debugging in WebDynpro Application.
    Can you please help me to bind the WORKITEMID from Workflow to WeBsynpro or from UWL to WebDynpro??
    Thanks
    Praveen

    Hi,
    You have bind the work item id to the task?
    You have added the work item id parameter in SWFVISU?
    Can you show us the UWL XML code for your task?
    Regards,
    Karri

  • Error in IAC based workflow through UWL

    Hi ITS Gurus,
    I was using WS20000081 leave request service in ITS 620 and SAP Inbox(BWSP) and it was working fine. Now we have upgraded the R/3 system to ECC 6.0 and published all the services to Integrated ITS 7.00 and the Kernel patch level is 55 and Basis support package is 7.
    a. I understand from a note 841785 that BWSP cannot be used in Integrated ITS. IS it true? is there any workaround to use BWSP in integrated ITS.
    b. I started trying it with UWL. In the UWL i can see the leave request task for approval. When i click the task, i can see the approval screen. When i click approve or reject, the screen does not close and the work item does not get completed and the workflow is strucked. I tested other workflows in UWL which are not ITS based, and they are working fine, only the Integrated ITS based workflows are not working in UWL. I dont know where the problem lies, whether at UWL or at Integrated ITS.
    Would appreciate your advice to solve the problem.
    Regards
    Sundar

    Hi Sundar,
    From my point of view this is definitely no ITS problem.
    Let me explain why.
    The IAC sbwp creates a frameset which controls the complete process chain of a workflow. This means there is application (programming) logic which controls the starting, executing and ending of a workitem.
    ITS provides the technique but not the programming logic.
    The UWL is an application which can start a workflow but doesn't take care of the result and that seems to be the problem. UWL should control the execution and ending of a workitem to update his list of workitems (according to user decisions).
    It was not the decision of the ITS team to stop support for IAC sbwp with Integrated ITS. You might adress a developemnt request on the relevant component (BC-BMT-WFM) to urge them to support bwsp with Integrated ITS as well.
    Thanks and regards,
    Dieter

  • FM to read the different steps in workflow and the status at each step

    Hi All,
    Is there any FM in SAP which gives the detail roadmap of the steps taken in a workflow and the diffrent status or decision at each step.
    I am looking for something like what you see when you click on the "STARTED WORKFLOW" in the business workplace outbox.
    Which shows up the "steps in the process so far "  and the decision and the agents for each of them.
    Thanks,
    Charan.

    Hi,
      You can get the status according to the task. please check with FM "SAP_WAPI_GET_WI_DELTA".
    Regards
    SM Nizamudeen

  • Report for outstanding workflows and the agents responsible

    I need a report that shows all leave request workflows , with userid who created them and approver (agent), and approver's org unit and personnel number.
    is there a standard SAP report that can show that? or I need to develop one?
    I was looking at the SWI2_FREQ, this report shows the leave request workflows and userid who created them, but it does not report on the agent.
    Regards,
    Tiberiu

    Hi
    I think by making use of SAP_WAPI_WORKITEMS_TO_OBJECTS you can get all the workitems who created the leave wokritems.
    Regards
    Pavan

  • Siebel & "BIP Report Generation" Workflow and Bookmark Syntax

    IHAC that wants to schedule the generation of a BIP report to run every weeknight and include a list of activities for the next day. We've utilized an OOTB IO and can successfully render the report using Sample XML in MS Word. Additionally, since they are only on 8.1.1, they do not currently have access to the latest scheduling capabilities. Therefore, we're trying to implement a repeating component to call a workflow to generate the report using the 'BIP Report Generation' workflow and the associated objects (from support posting 823360.1).
    Now to the questions:
    One of the parameters for the workflow is a 'Bookmark'. This parameter does not appear to handle various 'Siebel' querying functions like 'Today()' as part of the criteria. Can someone confirm this statement?
    Currently, I can imagine one high-level possible workarounds. This would entail a revised WF and that includes a prior step to generate the 'Bookmark' by retrieving a string representation of tomorrow's date and concatenating it with the rest of the criteria.
    Next question:
    Does anyone have any other possible alternatives? Maybe a calculated field in the BC/IC for 'Today() + 1' - but this could have performance implications.
    Thanks in advance for any help.

    Suggestions/comments?
    Bump.

  • Tapeless workflows and Sandy Bridge or other PC's: KISS or LOVE?

    Tapeless workflows and Sandy Bridge or other PC's: KISS or LOVE?
    Life used to be so simple when shooting video on a tape based camera. You shot your material, captured it for editing and stored your precious original footage on tape in a safe and dry place. Sure, it took time to capture, but the big advantage was that if you had a computer or drive failure, you would still have the original tape so everything could be recreated.
    Now with tapeless workflows we have the significant advantage of much faster import of the original footage. Connect the flash card or disk drive to the computer over USB and copy the data to a HDD on the computer, ready for editing. The data on the flash card or disk drive can then be erased, so you can reuse it for more shots. But, like Johan Cruyff has said repeatedly, every advantage has its drawback. In this case it simply means that you no longer have the original material to fall back on, in case of computer or drive failures. That is a very unpleasant and insecure feeling.
    The easy anwser to that problem is backups. Backup of the original media, backup of projects and backup of exports. This often means a bundle of externals for backup or NAS configurations. One thing is clear, it requires discipline to make regular backups and it costs time, as well as a number of disks. Four as a minimum: 1 for media, 1 for exports and at least 2 for projects. Note: This is excluding a backup drive for OS & programs.
    There are different backup strategies in use. Some say backup daily and use one disk for monday, one for tuesday, and so on.  Others say one disk for the first backup, the second for the second backup, then the first again for an incremental backup, etc. and once weekly a complete backup on a third disk. Whatever you choose, be aware that shelf live of a disk is far less than tape. There are horror stories everywhere about ball-bearings getting stuck after some time and without original tapes, you better be safe than sorry, so don't skimp on backups.
    What is the relevancy of all this? I thought this was about Sandy Bridge and other PC's.
    It is and let me try to explain.
    Card based cameras are for the most part DSLR and AVCHD type cameras, and we all know how much muscle is required to edit that in a convenient way. Adobe suggests in the system requirements to use raid configurations for HD editing and practice has shown that raid arrays do give a significant performance boost and improve responsiveness, making for a nicer editing experience. The larger the project and the longer the time-line, the more a raid array will help maintain the responsiveness.
    One thing you would not do is using a raid0 for projects, media and exports, even if you have backups. The simple reason is that the chance of disk failure multiplies by the number of disks in the raid0. Two disks double the chance of disk failure, three disks triple the chance, four disks quadruples the chance, etc.
    Remember: Disaster always strikes when it is most inconvenient.
    Imagine you have been working all day on a project, you decide to call it a day and to make your daily backup, but then the raid fails, before you made your backup. Gone is all of today's work. Then take into consideration the time and effort it takes to restore your backups to the state it was in yesterday. That does not make you happy.
    Another thing to avoid is using a software or mobo based parity raid, for the simple reason that it is slooowww and puts a burden on the CPU, that you want to use for editing, not house keeping.
    For temporary or easily recreated files, like the page-file, media cache, media cache database and preview files, it is very much advised to use a raid0. It makes everything a lot snappier and if disaster strikes, so what? These are easily recreated in a short time.
    This was a general overview of what is required with tapeless workflows. Now let's get down to what this means in terms of system design.
    Two approaches or train of thoughts
    KISS: Keep it stupidly simple or LOVE: Laughing over video editing
    The first one, the most economic one, is to use a system with 3 or 4 disks internally and 4 or more backup disks.
    A typical disk setup can look like this:
    This is a perfectly sensible approach if one does not have large or complex projects, long time-lines and is willing to take the risk of occasionally losing a whole days work, between backups. Many hobbyists and consumers fall in this category.
    The KISS approach keeps it stupidly simple. The drawback is that there is no logical way to add more disks or storage. The discipline, diligence and effort required for regular backups make it far from a laughing matter. In fact it can quickly become a bore. Add to that the fact that the disk setup is simple but not very fast, so less suited for situations where lots of clips are involved, multi-cam is a regularly recurring situation or lots of video tracks are involved.
    A number of video editors want more from their system than the occasional platonic KISS, they want to really LOVE their system, which lead to the other train of thought.
    This is more costly than the KISS approach, but you all know a fiancée or wife is more costly and dear than the occasional kiss on the cheek by an old friend.
    Let's start with a typical disk setup. It may look like this:
    Two striking differences in comparison to the KISS approach:
    1. Much easier disk organization and more disks and thus more space.
    2. It requires a hardware raid controller, causing a higher investment cost. It is like an engagement ring. You don't get LOVE for free, one of the guiding principles of the oldest trade in the world.
    These are easy statements to make, but what are the benefits or advantages, that you would fall in LOVE with such a system, and what are the drawbacks? Think back to Johan Cruyff's adage.
    The only drawback is cost. The advantages are multiple, easier organization, more speed, more storage, snappier editing, no jerkiness, lesser requirements for regular backups and - this is the major benefit - hardly a chance of losing a day's work in case of a drive failure. Keep in mind that a parity raid keeps all your data intact in case of a drive failure, so lessens the need for up-to-date backups.
    We all know, we get what we pay for: "If you pay peanuts, you get monkeys. OTOH, if you pay money to monkeys, you get rich monkeys". But in this case you get what you pay for, a much better editing experience with a much easier workflow.
    Using a parity raid (be it raid 3/5/6/30/50/60) you get security, ease of mind that you are protected against losing precious media, that you need not worry about the last time you made a backup, that the editing you did today may be lost and you save valuable time editing and a lot of aggravation because of a much more responsive system.
    How does this all relate to Sandy Bridge and other PC's?
    First of all, the price difference between a Sandy Bridge / P67 platform and an i7-950+ / X58 platform is very small. Of course the new architecture is slightly more expensive than the older one, but the differences are small, almost not worth talking about.
    So what are the differences? Look below:
    The first thing to keep in mind is that the Sandy Bridge is the successor of the i7-8xx CPU and as such it is much more evolutionary than revolutionary. The CPU power has increased significantly over the i7-8xx due to new architecture and a smaller production process (32 nm), but in essence all the capabilities have remained unchanged. Same memory, same PCI-e lanes, same version, same L3 cache and no support for dedicated raid controllers.
    It is great that the processor performs much better than the older i7-8xx CPU's, almost achieving the level of the i7-9xx range of processors, but is still limited:
    The Sandy Bridge is unsuitable for anything more than a KISS system.
    Why? Because it lacks the required PCI-e lanes to accomodate more than a 16 x PCI-e nVidia card with CUDA support to enable hardware MPE acceleration and the integrated graphics are not supported by CS5.
    You may wonder if that is a bad thing. The plain and simple anser is NO. It is a great processor, it delivers great value for money, is a solid performer, but it has its limitations. Intel had a reason to position this CPU as a mid-level CPU, because that is what it is, a mid-level performer in comparison to what is to come.
    The term mid-level performer may seem strange when compared to the old generation of i7-9xx CPU's, because they perform almost equally well, but keep in mind that there is a generation difference between them.
    So what about the i7-9xx and X58 platform?
    It still is going strong. About the same performance as a Sandy Bridge, with only the much more expensive hexa-cores clearly in the lead, both performance and price wise. The quad cores deliver about the same value for money.  The main difference however is the platform that allows a dedicated raid controller to be installed, thus making it the platform of choice for those who want to go from a passing KISS to true LOVE.
    And what lies ahead?
    Sandy Bridge E on the Waimea platform (X68). Now that is revolutionary. More than double almost everything a processor can offer: double the cores, double the PCI-e lanes, triple the memory, more than double the L3 cache, increase the PCI-e support from 2.0 to 3.0, etc...
    This is why Intel calls this a high-end CPU / platform.
    So what now?
    If you prefer a KISS approach, choose either a Sandy Bridge/P67 or an i7-950+/X58 platform.
    If you wonder whether in the future you may need multi-cam more frequently, edit more complex projects and longer timelines or even progress to RED, look at KISS/LOVE solutions, meaning the i7-950+/X58.
    If you can't have downtime, time pressure is high, delivery dates to clients are critical or you edit highly complex projects, lots of multi-cam situations or lengthy time-lines, choose a LOVE solution, an i7-950+/X58 platform.
    If you have the time to wait till Q4/2011, Sandy Bridge E/Waimea looks to be worth the wait.
    Hope this gives you some more insight into recent and future developments and helps you make wise investment decisions.

    I'm upgrading from an AMD 3800+, cutting with Vegas 7 Pro. Usually shoot DSLR or HDV, sometimes P2, EX or RED. I have ridiculously cheap access to Macs, FCP/FCS, all kinds of software.
    I've been agonizing over this for the last month, was originally hoping the UD7 mobo was the solution, read the read about the NF200/PCIe issue a few days ago, http://www.dvinfo.net/forum/non-linear-editing-pc/489424-i7-980x-now-wait-sandybridge-2.ht ml- and still decided to go for a 2600k. 
    My preference is to treat my video footage the same way as my digital imagery: I make (at least) duplicate back ups of everything before reformatting the cards, never delete the back ups, and only worry about the day-to-day stuff at night. Unless I'm rendering or involved in other long processes, in which case I'll back up the work in process the next day. If I am under a really really tight deadline I might back up as I go.
    Yes, a RAID might make it easier, but I'm paranoid enough to prefer a slower, safer backup. You can always duplicate, and usually improve upon, a days work, but you can never get back original footage you lost. I have only ever had one hard drive die on me (a few enclosures crapped out, though)- it took a couple of (mostly unattended) hours to rectify. As a matter of act, I've had far more loss/damage from tapes than from hard drives.
    I ordered the UD7, 2 F4s and 4 F3Rs, understanding I will probably want to upgrade to SBE when it comes out, or maybe next year. The 2600k/mobo/RAM will likely hold its value better than a 950/X58, likely because of the marketplace as much as merit.
    The UD7 / RAID card issue is in it's early days, there may be a solution/mitigation. Probably not. But if I really really need a RAID card, then I probably really really need a 980, NAS, etc etc.
    But Harm still rocks!

  • Difference between SAP Business Workflow and CRM Workflow

    Hello guys,
    Is there any difference between SAP Business Workflow and CRM Workflow?
    Are there others workflows types in SAP?
    In all SAP Workflow Courses (BIT600, BIT601, BIT603, BIT610) only was talked about SAP Business Workflow, and nothing about CRM Workflow.
    Thanks a lot!
    Kleber

    Hello Kleber,
    There is not much of the differance between CRM workflows and SAP Business  workflows..
    Workflows are esentially part of Basis (BC) components and hence its the same across all SAP products as all these products have components of Basis(BC) in them...
    To Conclude, SAP Busines workflows and CRM workflows are the same things... However when you work on CRM, the BOR objects would be belonging to CRM and not to ECC... However conceptwise , there in no change at all.. If you learn BIT100......, you can also work on CRM workflows..
    Regards,
    Anand

Maybe you are looking for