Working with NIK Collection reduces file size

HDR Efex produces out of three RAW-files with each 24 MB one JPG-file with 27 MB. Sharpening this with HDR Sharpener reduces the size to 19 MB. The following noise reduction leaves me with 9 MB. Why is this and what does this mean?
Thanks for any explication

Export the DivX clip as a DV-AVI file using File>Export>Movie. Then replace the DivX clip on the timeline with the DV-AVI clip.

Similar Messages

What should I work with for an initial file size for final print pieces that range from 18"x12" to 40' x 20'.

I am shooting in Canon RAW and using background plates with green screen images. I am not certain whether I need to create the initial file in multiple sizes for the various final print pieces, or if a single file size should be used and then down-rezzed or uprezzed based on what needs to be printed.
File sizes are:
18" x 12" (inches)
40" x 27" (inches)
30" x 60" (inches)
60" x 120" (inches)/5' x 10' (feet)
20' x 40' (feet)
The largest size format we are doing as 1/10 scale at 720 dpi to go down to 72 dpi for print.
Any suggestions would be helpful. Much thanks.

Is it ok to delete the stuff from the Final Cut Express Documents since I don't need it anymore?
No problem.
Regards the external drive. Check that it is formatted to Mac OS Extended or you will strike trouble and connect it with a firewire cable, not USB.
Al

PDF reduce file size filters and CMYK to RGB conversion

This doesn't seem to be on-topic to this forum, but I'm hoping someone here has the expertise to answer my question. We have some scripts which take a series of press-quality pdfs and use the "reduce file size" filter to prepare them for viewing on the web. We run these scripts on a 10.4 machine, and the filter works very well, reliably reducing file sizes of all sorts of pages.
When we tried to upgrade the machine, we discovered that the quartz filtering has changed in 10.5 and 10.6. While it's usually an improvement, getting maybe 5-10% better compression ratios, it has become unreliable in that about 5% of my files fail spectacularly -- they blow up to 3, 4, 5, 6 times the original size.
The other thing that happens is that the 10.5/10.6 filters munge the colors up. I found the solution to this -- in the ColorSynchUtility, make a duplicate of the Reduce File Size filter, and add a Color Management Component called Convert To Profile. This allows me to set a filter that converts the CMYK content to RGB. The problem is that there are about 40 choices of profiles, and it's not at all clear what I should use. Many of them have printer manufacturer's names in them, some say "Adobe", others have cryptic codes (probably referring to various RFCs and schemes). I've tried a couple of the ones that don't look like they are for printers, basically chosen at random. They all produce files of slightly different sizes for the reductions that go well, but on the files that blow up, some filters are better than others. (For example, I have a 5MB page which reduces to 1.4MB with the 10.4 filter, but blows up to 27MB with the "sRGB IE61966-2.1" profile, but only 12MB with the "Adobe RGB" profile.)
So I have 2 questions:
1) Is there any way to configure a 10.5/10.6 custom profile so that it behaves as reliably as the 10.4 "stock" PDF Reduce File Size works? It doesn't have to be the most wonderful compression algorithm out there, just so that it never or rarely has a file blow up in size.
2) For converting press documents to pdfs that are going to go on the web, what is a good "Convert to profile" to use of the 40-some choices on the pull-down menu?

Cathy,
You have posted your question in a forum dedicated to the Final Cut Studio application Color. It is a very specialized program to grade (adjust) the color in video/film images. We know nothing regarding PDFs.
Have you tried posting this on an Adobe support site?
Good luck,
x

Save As Does NOT Reduce File Size

I have tried everything to reduce the file size of my Adobe Acrobat Pro X Form with Save As (Reduce File Size, As Optimized, etc...). Unfortunately, the file size does not reduce. I send to a friend who has Acrobat 9 and he is able to reduce the file from 45mb to 182kb...what gives? He sent my original file to his co-worker who has Acrobat Pro X and he has the same issue that I do. This appears to be a version issue. Any help would be appreciated as I have about 150 of these that I need to get down to a reasonable file size.

Actually, I found something else. It's very curious.
The form fields themselves are OK, and there is only one tiny copy of CopperPlate Light.
There is a place in a PDF where there is supposed to be a copy of each font used a form field. This lists (presumably) every font you own and then some - over 500 fonts, all embedded. This is clearly not what you wanted and not what the software should do.
It would be interesting to know the life cycle of this form (by which I mean how it was born and what happened along the way). It was made with Acrobat 10 from Word, but that (presumably) didn't do the bad thing. Can you remember what happened to the file in the mean time? Was it only EVER edited in Acrobat X, or were any other utilities used on it - even if they didn't seem to be related to form fields at all? Do you have any old copies before it grew in size?

Adobe Acrobat Pro XI 11.0.06 when I reduce file size or try to optimize, I get this error: The document could not be saved. A number is out of range. I do the exact same thing every month and it works. I did it a few days ago and it worked. I receated the

Adobe Acrobat Pro XI 11.0.06 when I reduce file size or try to optimize, I get this error: The document could not be saved. A number is out of range. I do the exact same thing every month and it works. I did it a few days ago and it worked. I receated the pdf, I renamed it. tried to do it before I imported more pages. no go. the 16 mg pdf will normally reduce to 5 or 6

Hi,
Are you facing the issue with any pdf file?
Please try updating Acrobat to 11.0.7 and check.
You might also want to repair Acrobat and see.
Regards,
Rave

Reduce file size with action wizard

(German version below)
Hey,
I got two questions for action wizard in Acrobat XI Pro.
I try to reduze file size of many PDFs using acion wizard. My tests worked fine but now I got some problems I try to explain now:
1. I add a directory with many subdirectorys to my process list. Adobe now adds not only PDFs to my list, it also adds JPGs, DOCs etc. That means I have to delete every single file I not want to convert to PDF cause I only want to reduce file size of excisting PDFs. Is there any possibility to only add PDFs in my processing list?
2. If a PDF is opend by any other user I get a information about it. This info I need to acknowledge every time it pops up cause my process interrups. Is there any possibility to ignore this info?
I´m happy for any help i can get here. Thx.
Regards
(Sorry for bad english, it´s not my favorite language )
Hallo Leute,
ich benötige Hilfe beim Benutzen des Aktionsassistenten im Acrobat XI Pro.
Ich versuche bei sehr vielen PDFs die Dateigröße zu verringern. Dazu habe ich mir eine Stapelverarbeitung per Aktionsassistent erstellt die bei meiner Testumgebung auch super funktioniert. Leider habe ich noch einige Probleme für die ich Hilfe benötige:
1. Wenn ich einen Ordner mit sehr vielen Unterordnern und verschiedenen Inhalten einfüge möchte ich eigentlich nur die PDFs verarbeiten. Leider fügt Acrobat auch alle JPGs DOCs etc. hinzu. Ich muss also alle unerwünschten Dokumente herausfiltern, da auch keine sortierung vorhanden ist. Bei mehreren Tausend Dokumenten nicht leistbar. Gibt es hier eine Möglichkeit nur PDFs in die Stapelverabeitung aufzunehmen?
2. Sollte die Verarbeitung mal laufen kommt es hin und wieder vor das die PDFs durch einen Benutzer geöffnet sind. Ich bekommen hier eine Meldung von Acrobat die ich erst bestätigen muss bevor es weiter geht. Da das Programm eigentlich über mehrer Tage/Wochen im Hintergrund laufen soll passt mir das gar nicht wenn ich alle Stunde überprüfen muss ob die Stapelverabeitung noch läuft.
Ich hoffe es gibt jemanden der mir helfen kann. Ich bin über jede hilfreiche Antwort glücklich.
Gruß

For starters, let's refer to your original post: "this is indeed a serious problem and step back in functionality..." This statement is a quite ridiculous assertion, unnecessarily dramatic, wholly inaccurate, and unhelpful. Your statement "is this a joke" and "I know Acrobat tends to choke...etc..." is just pure gibberish and polemical. It is quite easy to feed any application enough data to cause a performance failure, but one would really need to question one's motive and prudent use of one's time at this point - unless you are tasked with stress and load testing the software to determine minimum working requirements.
'Batch Processing' is, since Acrobat 9.x, dead and gone, Acrobat 11's approach is to aggregate many hitherto unavailable tools and commands and allow the user to create custom workflows. More interactivity has been built into the process, which may or may not be desirable in each case depending on the workflow context and requirements. But we have obviously moved away from the concept of processing a large number of files and towards a more targeted and effective processing of smaller sets of files. The default Actions we deliver with Acrobat 11 reflect this intention.
The feature "Batch Processing", which was an Acrobat feature from A5 (I believe) up to A9, previously had been hidden in Menu/Advanced/Document Processing/Batch Processing has been wholly replaced by a completely overhauled framework called Actions, now part of the Tools panel, and will be immediately accessible when Tools is called in the UI.
Thus the obscured Batch Processing may have been a tool considered and used by an extremely small set of users to do exactly that, i.e., batch process a large number of files, but had been fairly inflexible, generally speaking, and buggy. We were very well aware that if we were to overhaul the feature, add a considerably larger number of available tools and commands in Acrobat, provide wide possibilities for customization built towards specific workflows, and bring it to the forefront, we were going to sacrifice some of the aspects of batch processing a large number of files. Not calling it "Batch Processing" anymore - because it isn't - may be an indication of this intention.
Personally I have used and tested Batch Processing periodically during various Acrobat projects, but I don't remember encountering the "Reduce File Size" command - which is a subset of Save and file optimization - to use within a batch sequence. I may be wrong, and your screen shots would be welcome here. In fact go ahead and construct a batch sequence that (1) uses 'Reduce File Size and (2) applies file type filters to it, and post it either here or to me privately. I would be happy to be wrong. But regardless, we are grateful for positive input that points out defects, allows us to improve the functionality of the product, providing the intended changes are reasonable, and that the communication of said issues remain respectful of this process and of the individuals we depend upon to implement these changes. The tone of your response comes very close to rendering a proper consideration of this issue irrelevant.

Reduce File Size doesn't work!

When I click the (new) option 'Reduce File Size' in Keynote '09 the app prompts a estimated new size which is smaller than the current size. When I click on 'Reduce' the app doesn't do anything except for showing an error report which tells me something like: "..the file size was not reduced", for all of the files included. They are just regular .jpg/.png and .psd files. Did anyone else notice this bug..?

PeterBreis0807 wrote:
I'd say if it is a very large file with multiple large images, it might not be actually freezing, just taking its sweet time.
It's why I leave Activity Monitor running when I use iWork applications.
This way, I know ifd the app is dead or if it's heavily busy.
Either that or it has nothing to do. It trims and reduces the resolution of bitmap images to 72dpi. There will be a fair bit of work if you have transparency in the document.
It doesn't do a very good job IMHO and to reduce the file by 90% is a big ask.
The 'Reduce FileSize' feature isn't linked to the 'export to PDF' feature.
As explained, before applying "Reduce file size" it's good practice to "Reduce Image File Size".
This will drop the parts of the pictures which aren't displayed.
The asked task doesn't imply a reduction of the pictures by 90%.
As I already wrote several times, it's more efficient to crop images to the really used area *_before inserting them in a Pages document_*.
A Pages document is huge by nature because the Index.xml file describing its contents is highly verbose.
If the document was saved with the 'embed Preview.pdf' feature active, the size of this PDF is adding a lot of used space.
I'd print to pdf and reduce the quality in Acrobat Pro.
Most of us don't own Acrobat Pro.
I feel that it would be a bit silly to buy an application whose price is : 450$ as a complement for a 80$ set of applications.
Before doing that, I would
(a) crop pictures before inserting them
(b) try to enhance Pages behaviour for free installing enhanced PDF filters.
Yvan KOENIG (VALLAURIS, France) dimanche 29 août 2010 09:53:44

I have to zip pdf files to email them to someone with a PC. The problem is they aren't smaller after zipping and I can't email them. I tried adjusting the Quartz filter to the Reduce file size. Now they're smaller, but the recipient can't read them. Help!

I need to zip pdf files to email them to a PC user. The problem is file size is not reduced.
I tried zipping them in Win 7 (which I use via Parallels 7) and sending them to the Finder to email.
But lately nothing is reduced. I tried choosing the Reduce File Size option in the Quartz Filter when I save the doc. The file size was reduced. However, the recipient could not read the file. Everything was blurry.
Is there a solution?

I am having some PDF sizing issues also, I am a BETA tester for TurboCAD Mac, and with the usage of (public) version 5, I have had some scaling issues. I have had (auto sent) 15 plus crash reports, (available as text) and had posted my scenario within the "lion- problems so far" article, so not to use up extra bandwith- or whatever- there are pictures there. I was not able to upload a PDF on site, and the staff @ Turbo CAd is working on it also. this is Lion specific new update, as I have posted many large format PDF's
Here (edit to add url)
Thanks for the helps!
Johnny

Reduce file size not working

I have Adobe Acrobat 7 Professional. I scanned an 868 page text only document using two different professional scanners at my work, Xerox Docucolor and Canon DR-6030 Scanner.
The scanned settings were 300 dpi, black and white, duplex. No photos, not even line art.
1. The result was a 32 mb file. I don't know why it's so big. It should be no more than 4-6 mb.
2. Furthermore, the file size remained unchanged after I used the reduce file size command.
I am baffled, any help would be appreciated.
Thank you.

Try the PDF Optimizer. You could also try a ClearScan OCR. If you did OCR, but did not do ClearScan, then you are simply looking at pictures of your scan. The ClearScan will replace photos of text with actual text and a text file. You have left a lot out of what you have done in the scan. Also, scanners or the translations often give you a 24-bit graphic file even if it is really only B&W. Often the best results for OCR are gotten from a Gray Scale form in my experience. So, the structure of your PDF may be the issue. The PDF Optimizer also has an audit feature to show where most of the memory is being used.

How do you reduce file size of a PDF if Save As doesnt work?

I have been trying to reduce the size of a PDF, using the Save As > Optimized PDF method.
I have also tried Save As > Reduced Size PDF.
This is on a file made up of 20 pages of full page Jpegs. (These were generated by the script in Photoshop that generates Jpeg files from Layer Comps within the document.)
If I use Reduced Size PDF, I get a greatly reduced file size but the image quality suffers greatly. (Lots of artifacts and blurryness)
There are no options to choose the level of compression I want.
If I use Optimized PDF method, I cant seem to reduce the file size no matter what I set the Jpeg compression to.
Is there some way to cut the size of the file down but not lose so much image quality?
Any suggestions?

Part of the problem here is that the files that are produced when I run the script to output files from layer comps are very big.
If I "save for web" for each layer comp, I wind up with way smaller Jpegs. Thus a much smaller PDF.
So the question is: Can you make the script, Layer Comps to Files, create smaller more optimized Jpegs? (Like you get when you save for web)

What do I loose with "Reduce File Size" to Acrobat 8.0 compatability?

When scanning documents using the Acrobat interface in 9.0, I find that the file sizes are very large...about 1.5MB per page. If I then select the "reduce File Size" option from the Document tab, and select Acrobat 8.0 and later compatibility, the file size is reduced by 10 fold....to something approaching 150 KB per page. I don't see degradation of the scanned image on my screen....but am I loosing image quality?

I tried it at home & I used the optimize pdf thing. It went from 17MB to 12MB so I re-optimized it & got it down to 3MB. It's as good as it is going to get. The big problem is that the .pdf that I have was scanned on a copier machine.
I printed the 3MB pdf on the color printer & it came out okay, but then I printed it on the black & white printer & it barely had any ink on the page....
I am just going to not bother with it anymore. Not much I can do with a scanned document & it's not even my job to begin with!
Thanks Bill.
Jules

Reduce File Size - File smallest with Acrobat 4.0/5.0 compatibility

This is with Acrobat 8.
Contrary to the information on the Reduce File Size dialog which says, Setting Compatibility to later versions of Acrobat will allow greater reduction in file size, I have a number of PDF files which gain the most reduction in size when set to Acrobat 4 and later.
Here is the various sizes by Acrobat revision chosen for one of the documents:
Make Compatible With
File Size
Retain Existing
79,202,311
Acrobat 4.0 and later
19,884,757
Acrobat 5.0 and later
19,884,773
Acrobat 6.0 and later
27,611,913
Acrobat 7.0 and later
27,611,909
Acrobat 8.0 and later
27,611,920
After the conversion when the file is reopened in Acrobat the file appears the same visually.
So the question is, am I losing any content by choosing the reduction to the smaller file size of Acrobat 4.0/5.0?
As I have a large number of these files the additional space saving would be good but not at the loss of significant information.
Thanks,
Jay

You will lose any information that is not compatible with AA4 or AA5. It may be that the information is not needed and so there is no visual difference.

Reducing file sizes with symbols when it's already too late

Is it possible to turn something into a symbol when you have already placed it multiple times on the artboard? I have created very complex artwork that my client is very happy with, but I haven't shown her the file sizes! Ultimately this has to be uploaded to a webpage so it can be downloaded and printed by many people. I think I should have used symbols rather than cutting and pasting bits of art but now it's done and I don't want to redo it if it can be avoided.
Other ways of reducing file sizes would also be helpful.
Thanks for any help!

And what does "downloaded from a website" mean? As PDF? If so, it doesn't matter. You would simply flatten and optimize the PDF. Symbols are AI specific and don't carry over to foreign formats, so it would be wasted effort trying to replace anything. if you still must, try this: http://www.illustrationetc.com/AI_Javascripts/ReplaceScripts.htm
Mylenium

ORA-19510: failed to set size with ORA-27059: could not reduce file size

Hi,
I have RMAN backup implemented and getting below error.
RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
RMAN-00569: =============== ERROR MESSAGE STACK FOLLOWS ===============
RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
RMAN-03009: failure of backup command on c1 channel at 01/12/2014 04:28:37
ORA-19510: failed to set size of 12839996 blocks for file "/home/oracle/DBBACKUP/Oracle10g1/Full_Backup/DB_Backup_201401128366598241" (blocksize=16384)
ORA-27059: could not reduce file size
Linux Error: 28: no space left on device
Additional information: 2
I have checked with following scenarios:
1. taking backup by setting the MAXSETSIZE parameter value greater than the maximum size of tablespace.
2. taking compressed incremental backup with maxsetsize as unlimited.
3. taking compressed incremental backup with maxpiecesize value as 20G/40G/80G/120G and maxsetsize as unlimited.
Following is the RMAN backup script:
RMAN> run
2> {
3> allocate channel c1 device type disk maxpiecesize 120G
4> format '/home/oracle/DBBACKUP/Oracle10g1/Full_Backup/DB_Backup_%Y%M%D%t%p';
5> backup incremental level 0 as compressed backupset database plus archivelog delete input;
6> crosscheck backup of database;
7> crosscheck backup of controlfile;
8> crosscheck archivelog all;
9> delete noprompt expired backup of database;
10> delete noprompt expired backup of controlfile;
11> delete noprompt obsolete recovery window of 15 days;
12> release channel c1;
13> }
14> exit;
Oracle database version is 10.2.0.1.
The database is on Linux system and we are taking the RMAN backup on mounted Windows NTFS disk.
The remaining space on NTFS system 1.7TB and the total database size 850GB. Used size by database is 500GB.
Regards,
Yogesh.

Hi,
First get the backup piece size its trying to allocate for file "/home/oracle/DBBACKUP/Oracle10g1/Full_Backup/DB_Backup_201401128366598241"
= 12839996*16384
= 210370494464/1024/1024/1024
=195.9GB
Its trying to allocate ~196GB for the file.
1. Make sure the RMAN backup piece won’t exceed the O/S permitted filesize limit.
2. But we can restrict the RMAN backup piece using the MAXPIECESIZE option.
You restricted it to 120GB but actual requirement to allocate backup piece file is ~196GB.
I think you need to change the MAXPIECESIZE and give it a try.
Please update if it succeeded or failed.
Thanks & Regards,
Gayu

Reducing file size #2...Preview, Quartz Filter vs Adobe Pro Optimize

Questions on reducing a pages to pdf file…I will post each question seperatly.
2) I read that you can reduce file size of a pdf in preview with a quartz filter. I created my own filer and it worked as expected. But, I also have Adobe Acrobat Pro, with save as PDF Optimized. The pro seems to have much more capability than the quartz filters.
Is one better that the other to use? The adobe optimize (standard settings) took it from 20 to 6 megs.
THanks, Bob

The Adobe Acrobat settings you chose are probably using .jpeg to reduce the file size.
.jpegs are lossy. ie You lose detail and sharpness the more you compress the image.
The Quartz filters are usually of very high quality, but they are a black box and you need to understand what the settings are in each one. Quartz filters are extremely powerful, fast and as I said usually high quality but I suggest you experiment and see if they meet your needs.
Peter

Working with NIK Collection reduces file size

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for