Workplan Version Name

Anyone have a way to turn off the workplan version naming convention that Oracle Projects uses each time you publish a new workplan.....the system generates it something like this unless you manually change the name:
Copy: Copy: Copy: Copy: Copy: Copy: Copy: Copy: Copy: Copy:version 3

From the front end there is no way to change this behavior. I think you can have a custom solution for this. May be a trigger to check the pa_budget_versions table, whenever a new record is inserted, just try to change the version name.
Hope this helps!
Sathish Raju
www.projectsaccounting.com

Similar Messages

  • API to create a new Workplan Version

    Hi,
    We are trying to Create a new workplan version in Oracle Projects Suite .Can anybody please guide me as which API can be used for creation of a NEW WORKING version of workplan for the project.
    This is urgent and your input is highly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Manjula

    Can you specify the name of the API in PA_PROJECTS_PUB to create a new Work plan version for a given Budget.

  • Good evening. When I try to rename a master file or export a master file, it only allows 9 spaces for my new name, even though Aperature 3 allows many more spaces than that for version names. This creates a lot of problems and headaches for me.

    Good evening. When I try to rename a master file or export a master file, Aperature 3 only recognizes the first 9 spaces for raw .NEF files, even though it easily uses twice that many spaces for version names. I have a system in place that works really well for me, wherein by changing the file name I can recognize what's important to me just by glancing at the file name, no matter what system it is in, I do not have to open or mouse over anything to know what the file is. My files also arrange themselves in order no matter what file system they are in. Can someone please tell me if there is a setting, or something I am doing wrong, that prevents me from using a longer Master file name. I can't be the only person who would like to have his Master File names correspond to the name that appears in the Aperature library, and would like to use at least 16 spaces (numbers, letters, etc.)
    Thanks,
    Photo Al

    Hi Frank,
    As you suggested, I am attaching several screen shots. In the first one you can see how I set up my preset. I used "Custom Name" and "Counter" with a dot between the two drag ins, followed by "D90". I also have a dot to seperate the 8 digits in the Custom Name and make it easier to read.
    I then click "OK" which takes us to the second screen shot. Here you can see that in the Example File Name everything looks perfect, and you can see I have clicked on "Apply to Master Files".
    In the third screen shot you can see that the version in my library did in fact change correctly. With the "mouse over" pop up screen you can see, however, that the Master File name was changed  to "1933.1017.NEF". It failed to carry the "12D90" and if I go to where my masters are stored that is exactly what the name was changed to.
    In the fourth screen shot I attempt to export the master. You can see how my "Version Name" is set up.
    And finally on the 5th screen shot you see in the File Name Example the name "1933.1017.NEF" once again, which when I export the master is exactly how the name will appear. Since I will export more than one file at a time , a (1) and  a (2)  etc., will appear at the end of the names because all the files are being given the same "1933.1017.NEF" name.
    I hope this reply does a better job of clarifying my problem. I am anxious to see if this is something I simply misunderstood, or if I am simply doing something wrong.
    Thanks,
    Photo Al

  • Contact page and Version name question

    When making a contact sheet, is it possible to just have the image number under each photo and NOT the words "Version Name"?
    Thanks.

    I'm trying to find out whether this is possible as well. It's annoying having "Version Name" print out on something I'd like to show a client!

  • Question about Contact Sheets and Version name.

    When making a contact sheet, is it possible to just have the image number under each photo and NOT the words "Version Name" in front of each number?
    Thanks for any help.

    Hi John Cardamone;
    When I saw your question I had thought I had seen it before and was wondering if there was an answer on the other posting. So I did a search which brought up your seven posting of the same question that is all.
    Allan

  • How to batch change Caption with version name?

    I'm using Aperture 3.0.2. I want to caption the photos based on version name. This way when I export the photos from Aperture to Picasaweb, the caption will show. This will allow the visitors to tell me which image proof that I need to re-touch.

    I found my own answer. I wrote this AppleScript. It's my first AppleScript ever. It's nice to Goggle and found some other resources.
    tell application "Aperture"
    set imageSel to (get selection)
    if imageSel is {} then
    error "Please select an image."
    else
    repeat with i from 1 to count of imageSel
    tell library 1
    tell item i of imageSel
    make new IPTC tag with properties {name:"Caption/Abstract", value:get name}
    end tell
    end tell
    end repeat
    end if
    end tell

  • How to set Caption from Version Name?

    I am looking for an automated/batch method to write Caption from Version Name for thousands of photos.
    HAVE
    File Name: P1001.RAW
    Version Name: Red apple
    Caption:
    WANT
    File Name: P1001.RAW
    Version Name: Red apple
    Caption: Red apple

    http://homepage.mac.com/jlarson7/metadata/index.html has the following script, which may be closer
    ==============
    tell application "Aperture"
    tell library 1
    tell project "untitled project"
    tell image version "image001"
    --set value of IPTC tag "Caption/Abstract" of image version "Canon 1Ds" to "hello"
    --the above won't work IF the tag doesn't already have a value because the class doesn't exist until it does. Therefore you have to make the class then set its value. See the next tell block.
    end tell
    tell image version "image001"
    make new IPTC tag with properties {name:"Caption/Abstract", value:"hello"}
    --this line will work every time even if a value for the tag exists or not.
    end tell
    end tell
    end tell
    end tell
    ==============

  • Version name is not shown in browser, Aperture 3. I had it, but by accident I removed it.

    Version name is not shown in browser, Aperture 3. I had it, but by accident I removed it.
    I could not find the solution in Aperture Help.
    What is the command / option that makes the version name visible in the browser?
    Best regards,
    b adrian

    View->Metadata Display will show all the oprions and shortcuts.
    Metadata display is very rich in Aperture and appears in a lot of different areas of the display. Getting familiar with it all will make your Aperture experience a lot more rewarding.
    See Working with Metadata in the manual.

  • Import iPhoto Title as Aperture Version Name?

    QUESTION: How do you import your iPhoto library such that the Titles you've applied in iPhoto become the Version Names in Aperture?
    DETAILS: Upon import, Aperture ignores my custom iPhoto Titles ("Lunch at Summit", for example) and replaces them with the original file name (DSCF2966, for example). I hate looking at a screen full of DSCxxxxx names. Worse, I've spent a lot of time titling my pictures in iPhoto. I don't want to lose that work.
    BACKGROUND: In iPhoto, I typically Batch Change a just-imported set of photos, setting the Title to nothing. Then I give meaningful names to pictures that I care about titling. This way, I reduce visual clutter on the photo display; any title text I see is there because I typed it in. When I try this trick in Aperture, it displays "<untitled>" for any pictures I remove the camera's DSCxxxxx from.
    QUESTION 2: Is it a bad idea to get rid of the camera DSCxxxx Version Names?
    I've experimented with the Import settings, searched these forums, the web, and the Aperture help files, to no avail.
    Thanks!
    David Long

    Kirby, thanks for your helpful response. I just experimented with the Version Name field in the iPhoto import dialog and found that setting Version Name to Version Name in the
    File-->Import-->iPhoto Library...
    import dialog still does not preserve the Titles from iPhoto.
    However, using
    File-->Import-->Show iPhoto Browser...
    DOES preserve the iPhoto Titles. Unfortunately, this method loses much of the Places information in the iPhoto library. I describe which Places info gets lost in this forum post:
    http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=11229662#11229662
    So, this leaves us with a conundrum:
    -If we use the "Show iPhoto Browser..." method to import, we retain our Titles but lose our Faces and Places data.
    -If we use the "Import-->iPhoto Library..." method, we retain [most of] our Places and Faces data, but completely lose our Titles from iPhoto.
    Either way, we lose some of the metadata work we put into our iPhoto library.
    Anybody know a solution to this problem?
    ...David

  • Any way to stop facebook exporter from using version names as the caption

    I tried the Aperture 3 facebook export and it is using the version names as the caption. If I change the caption on facebook it then changes the version name in my aperture library when it syncs with facebook. Is there anyway to have it use the caption meta data field instead? You would think if they had that option for mobile me they would have it for FB too.

    Add me to the list of people interested by this issue - but AFAIK there is no way to change this. Let's hope Apple fixes this soon.

  • What exactly is the "Version Name" to be used for?

    Hi -
    I just picked up Aperture and have been trying to figure it out. And to be honest, I'm pretty darn OCD about photo organization - which is one reason Aperture appealed to me more than iPhoto, which I've been using forever.
    So I've literally been going around tagging all 4000 photos I've imported, but I'm wondering what the "Version Name" is supposed to be for. I've been told this is very important for when you create new versions from the master, that they should all be different. However the majority of my photos are just old high school photos and whatnot that I could care less about touching up ever.
    So then what exactly should I do with the "Version Name"? Is this supposed to be a specific name (such as, "dan at the beach, edited", etc) or should I just called them something like "original" or "master"? Does this affect the actual filename? What is the general usage of this?

    it's basically the name of the photo. it's the name/title that will appear in your albums, books, etc. if you have more than one version of a photo, you might use different names to distinguish them; eg, adding 'B&W' for black and white versions, etc.
    many people; myself include; use 'caption' for descriptions.

  • Why have my version names disappeared from Browser view?

    I know there is an easy solution to this because it has happened to me before. In the Browser viewer in Aperture 3, I can usually see the Version name under each thumbnail. The Version names have disappeared and I can't remember how to get them back. Please help!

    Dan D'Errico wrote:
    Thanks! I was looking for this info all over the internet and in Aperture Help. What does U stand for anyway? And how would I search to find that answer on the web ? Is there a corresponding menu item for this in Aperture - and where is it buried? It was really driving me crazy. Thanks again!
    Sometimes finding stuff is hard especially something like this that doesn't seem to have a particular name. But in this case the information under the image is metadata so trying a search for that in the help box got me:

  • Sharing photos by e-mail arranged by version name

    I need to send all photos in one project from Aperture by e-mail arranged by version name. That is, all photos in the letter must be ordered by version name. When i use Share button Aperture generates an e-mail where the photos are mixed.
    Does anyone know how to do it?

    unfortunately the photos mix in the body of the email message...
    probably my Aperture needs some additional adjustments...
    You can "select all" in the body of the email message and "{right-click}➞View as Icon".  This makes seeing the filenames easier, and makes it easier to rearrange the files.
    Yes! when i do this i can see the filenames mixture: 3,5,8,1,2,6, etc instead of 1,2,3,4,5...
    You can export the files to a Finder Folder, and then import them into a mail message.  This may make ordering the files the way you want them easier.
    You can ask your recipient to save the files to a Finder Folder (or equivalent) and sort on file name and view them from the Finder (using Quick View).
    You can export as a Web Gallery and send the Web Gallery to your recipient with instructions to double-click it.  This should open in their Web browser.
    yes, i know it. but it's less convenient for me

  • Set version name from IPTC Title field?

    I'm no AppleScript genius but I am sure there shouldn't be a whole lot of lines of code needed for me to grab a selection of images and change their version name to whatever the IPTC title field is.
    basically right now the version names are messed up due to tampering but the IPTC metadata is fine, so i want the metadata to prevail over whatever aperture has as name & keywords.
    Anyone got an idea of how to do this simply and quickly? I know I have a batch file renaming utility but I don't think that will help me in this case as aperture doesn't 'care' about file name does it?
    This is on Aperture 3.5 (latest version)

    Lightroom stores metadata in its own database, located:
    [Username]/Pictures/Lightroom/Lightroom Database.lrdb (Mac OS) file.
    [Username]/My Documents/My Pictures/Lightroom/Lightroom Database.lrdb (Windows) file.
    This is different to CS5/Bridge where XMP sidecars contain the metadata for proprietary raw files and in others (DNG, Tiff, jpeg, PSD) it's contained in the XMP headroom within the image file.

  • Mass Changing a Version Name

    Is there a way to select a group of photos and mass change the Version Name? For instance, I have multiple pictures of Germany that currently have a version name of IMG_XXX.JPG - I'd like to change all these to just Germany.

    This advise works if you didn't give the photos a version name during importing . I gave about 160 photos the wrong version name due to my failure to check. when i imported, it listed my previuos version name from other photos. now i try a batch change but it only adds the new version name to the one i don't want ,I've tried replace instead of append with no luck. any advise to delete existing version name and add a new version name. wayne

Maybe you are looking for

  • Unable to display tree view; Error when parsing an XML document (Premature end of file.)

    Hi folks, I am using a cascaded mapping in my OM. I have a graphical mapping followed by the Java mapping. It is a flat file to IDOC mapping. Everything works fine in Dev but when I transport the same objects to QA, the Operation mapping though it do

  • Upgrade to CS5 not printing properly

    Just upgraded to CS5 (ver 7.0.4) . Seem to be having difficulty printing documents that include graphics.      Printer is RICOH Afico SP C811DN PS.      Vista Home SP2 Files that I had no problem with in CS4, are only printing portions of the text an

  • Changing font color site-wide??

    Hi, I am trying to change the color of my font and my links site-wide. Is there any easy way to do this? Thanks, David

  • Dvd image to large to fit screen

    i have a pavillon g series laptop.playing a dvd and the image is to large to fit screen . I have tried everything I know . I can play the dvd on my wifes laptop  it works fine (not a HP). any sugestions would be great

  • License sticker is for Vista Business, but Vista Basic is pre-installed

    I just bought a Satellite Pro L300 that was supposed to have Vista Business installed. When I turned on the laptop and went through the initial operating system installation and configuration, Vista Basic installed, without ever asking me for a licen