Workstation Advice

Hi -- I'm getting started in motion graphics and visual effects, and intend to start freelancing in addition to my full-time web job. I'd like to invest in a workstation between now and January for $3000-$6000, but am having some difficulty in understanding all the technical aspects of AE and hardware configurations. Mainly I don't want to have to say "no" to a gig because I can't do something a client would want or because it would take me too long (because of the computer being is too slow, that is).
I've spoke with Adobe, and they recommend:
Processor: Xeon E5, at least 3.0GHz, 8 cores
RAM: 32GB
Graphics: NVIDIA Quadro 4000
SSD: at least 512GB
I've been considering the HP Z840 (approx. $4000 + $400-600 for an SSD)
Operating system
Windows 7 Professional 64 (available through downgrade rights from Windows 8.1 Pro 64)
Processor
Intel® Xeon® E5-2630 v3 (2.4 GHz, 20 MB cache, 8 cores)
Number of Processors
1
Standard memory
16 GB 2133 MHz DDR4 ECC Registered RAM (2 x 8 GB)
Memory slots
8 DIMM (with 1 processor) and 16 DIMM (with 2 processors)
Internal drive
1 TB 7200 rpm SATA
Optical drive
Slim SATA SuperMulti DVD writer
Graphics
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 (4 GB)
Drive Bays
Four 3.5"
Network interface
Integrated Intel I210AT PCIe GbE
Integrated Intel I218LM PCIe GbE
Storage controller
Integrated SATA 6.0 Gb/s
These specs run low to what Adobe recommended, but I don't know how to figure out what the difference makes in terms what AE is actually capable of doing for a client.
I've also been considering the MacPro, but didn't know how significant the lack of NVIDIA is, and if it is significant, if Mac offers the option to get a Quadro 4000 (it's not clear on their website).
I'd like to be able to do 3D work (probably with Cinema 4D) but don't know how 3D integrates into a motion graphics workflow--if being able to work in 3D would accelerate projects.
The Adobe agent said there were problems with both Mavericks and Windows 8.1.
For someone just getting into motion graphics, but also wanting to make money, are the MacPro or Z820/840 overkill? If not, then is $3000 way too low of an expectation to be able to get the hardware I would need? If I go up to $6000, where is AE going to get the most value (performance/$)?
Thank you so much!
Tom

--Here's my rig:
i7-3930k CPU
AsRock X79 Extreme6 Mobo
Nvidia Quadro 4000
32Gb (4x8Gb) G.Skill RAM
Thermaltake 2.0 water cooler
250Gb Samsung SSD for OS and apps
10Tb (2x3Tb and 2x2Tb Seagate HDDs) of internal storage
OCZ ZX 1000W PSU
Win 7 Ultimate SP1
I built it last year and (knock on wood) didn't have any problems with the workstation yet.
Most of my work is animation/motion graphics for clients on [often] tight deadlines and I usually have AE/PPro/Illustrator, Photoshop and Bridge running at the same time, sometimes C4D as well
--Performance improvements in comparison to my previous workstation (same GPU, quad-core i7 CPU):
Cinema4D v14 render - 30%
After Effects CS6 render - 50%
Adobe Premiere CS6 Exporter (mixed 2K and 4K footage to QT HD) - 45%
Adobe Media Encoder (from folder to folder, not through Premiere Pro) - 40%
Improved scrubbing and preview in 2K and 4K sequences and multitasking.
*benchmark from a year ago
-Previews and scrubbing in After Effects and Premiere Pro rely on the video card, rendering utilizes 100% of CPU, same goes for Cinema4D. Preview chokes a little when scrubbing 5k footage in premiere, but in 1/2 rez plays back fine. I believe next gen graphics card would fix it, but not sure.
Hosting your media cache folders for PPro and AE on SSD drive helps a lot.
-Sometimes I run performance manager when rendering effects-heavy AE comp or rendering 5K footage and never noticed any tasks that would require more than 28Gb of RAM. My MoBo can support 64, but as of yet, I didn't see the need for the upgrade.
-I bought BluRay burner about 3 years ago, burnt exactly 1 job on it, and it just sits in the tower, collecting dust. I'm not quite sure if DVD/BR burner is a necessary part of a rig now days, unless you do wedding videos or something. In fact, I can't even recall using it as a DVD/BR reader.
--Few things to consider-
Hexacore processor runs pretty hot - water cooling is suggested
This particular video card runs pretty hot too - 90C while idling. I spoke with PNY engineer and he suggested NVIDIA Quadro 4000K - it's cooler and has 3Gb of VRAM and the difference is only about $150. Crossfire is not really supported by Quadro 4000 either.
My workstation is currently worth around $2800, according to pcpartpicker.com, not counting monitors, wacom tablet and other, and it's still up to speed with competition and relatively future-proof - all i can think of upgrading right now is a graphics card - and be good for another few years or so. But this is not the first system i built, so if you want a plug-and-play solution, get a Mac Pro - specs on that thing are rather sweet and my colleague is very happy with it.
hope that helped

Similar Messages

  • New System Build feedback/advice, please...

    Time to build a new WorkStation. My motivation for upgrading is that I have been using a mediocore laptop (i7m, 8gb, 250gb ) from my work as my home system for the last 2 years, I am starting to get more freelance coming in and need a good desktop.
    I am not so sure about my processor, mother board and video card choice. I am more interested in app usability than absolute throughput and want to maximise my dollar investment.
    Purchase date: this week
    Budget:  I'd like to stay close to $1000-1300, but can spend more for significant performance gains. As I do more  research, my inclinations are trending higher.
    System Usage: My primary uses will include photo editing with Lightroom and Photoshop, 3D graphics using 3D studio Max, Maya and Mud Box, HD video editing using Premiere and After Affects and  Web Design. I will also use it as an HD media player and hifi audio is important. Maximizing cs6 performance in premiere & pShop is my main target. I am focused mainly on user experience while running these apps. If I need to encode hrs of video or crank out frames in max/maya, I can do it at work. I seldom run games.
    Monitors: I'm running two Dell U2410's IPS, calibrated w\Color Munki, one portrait one lanscape.
    Parts to Upgrade: Full system build
    O/S : Win7 Ultimate, I might play with Ubuntu/Virtualization
    Vendor: Newegg unless I can save big $$ else where. I like B&H.
    It needs to be an Intel machine & I have chosen lga 2011 becuase I'll eventually go to 64gb. I'll do some modest overclocking.
    Any advice is appreciated. Thank you for your expertise.
    Processor:
    Intel Core i7-3820 Sandy Bridge-E 3.6GHz (3.8GHz Turbo Boost) LGA 2011 130W Quad-Core Desktop Processor BX80619i73820
    $299 w/ship
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115229
    or
    Intel Core i7-3930K Sandy Bridge-E 3.2GHz (3.8GHz Turbo) LGA 2011 130W Six-Core Desktop Processor BX80619i73930K
    $569 w/ship
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819116492
    Do you have any feeling about how much I'll gain by going to the 6 core cpu over the 4 core? Remember, for me usability in the cs6 apps is more important than marginal gains in throughput.
    Mobo:
    MSI X79A-GD45 (8D) LGA 2011 Intel X79 SATA 6Gb/s USB 3.0 ATX Intel Motherboard with UEFI BIOS
    $218 w/ship
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813130635
    or
    ASRock X79 Extreme6 LGA 2011 Intel X79 SATA 6Gb/s USB 3.0 ATX Intel Motherboard
    $240 w/ship
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813157289
    or
    MSI Big Bang-XPower II LGA 2011 Intel X79 SATA 6Gb/s USB 3.0 XL ATX Intel Motherboard with UEFI BIOS
    $380
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813130626
    I would really appreciate any feedback on mobos in regards to maximizing cs6...7...8 performance, system logiveity, and performance. Is it worth it to go for a higer end mobo? If so which one. I like the msi's based on eventually ug to 128 gb, but are they money well spent? Any probs w/these mobo's?
    Memory:
    G.SKILL Ripjaws X Series 32GB (4 x 8GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1600 (PC3 12800) Desktop Memory Model F3-12800CL10Q-32GBXL
    $130
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820231490
    Hard Drive:
    SAMSUNG 830 Series MZ-7PC256B/WW 2.5" 256GB SATA III MLC Internal Solid State Drive (SSD)
    $160
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820147164
    Video:
    GIGABYTE GV-N65TOC-1GI GeForce GTX 650 Ti 1GB 128-bit GDDR5 PCI Express 3.0 x16 HDCP Ready Video Card
    $160 w/ship
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814125447
    or
    MSI N660 Ti PE 2GD5/OC GeForce GTX 660 Ti 2GB 192-bit GDDR5 PCI Express 3.0 x16 HDCP Ready SLI Support Video Card
    Item#: N82E16814127696
    $300
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814127696
    I am still a little unsure of the real world differnces that I'll realize by doubling my video card expense, advice please?
    Optical Drive:
    LG Black 14X BD-R 2X BD-RE 16X DVD+R 5X DVD-RAM 12X BD-ROM 4MB Cache SATA BDXL Blu-Ray Burner with SW, 3D Play Back - BH14NS40
    $70
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16827136250
    Case:
    COOLER MASTER HAF 912 RC-912-KKN1 Black SECC/ ABS Plastic ATX Mid Tower Computer Case
    $60
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811119233
    Power Supply:
    FX Core Edition PRO650W (P1-650S-NLB9) 650W ATX12V 2.2 & ESP12V 2.91 SLI Ready CrossFire Ready 80 PLUS BRONZE Certified Active PFC Power Supply
    $90
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817207014
    Total     $1190
    or    $1760
    I have picked the MSI motherboard due to its support for 128gb ram, superior audio and other high end features. The AS Rock for its rep for solid value/performance. Opinions?
    Finally, I would like some advice on video cards. I prefer nVidia to ATI, but I'm not sure which chip to go for. The six fifties are cheaper, but the 660 ti provides more CUDA cores.

    Alex,
    I sure wish you would quick picking fights with lots of knowledgeable people just trying to help people build good PCs for running Adobe Premiere. (I am stating that based on not just this thread, but rather the strong challenges you seem to bring to about half of the threads that you've chosen to participate in).
    I was the original poster to suggest that Neal select a larger case. Next Harm agreed and cited 6 points which I would agree with regarding why a larger box is better for a video editing rig.
    What are the typical goals for someone wanting a video editing PC? I would expect that most users want:
    - robust, runs and never fails
    - has incredible power; face it, video editing with AVCHD is one of the most taxing applications a PC can face today
    - quiet; who wants to be doing creative work with any server room like wind noise
    Now let me be specific where you are simply WRONG WRONG WRONG:
    You stated: "Back pressure increases in larger spaces due to natural impedance of airflow (much like with electricity traveling over distance)"
    Fact: Exactly the opposite; Back pressure decreases in larger spaces due to more room for the air to flow (much like thicker copper passes electricity with less resistance than a thin wire)
    Your stated: "Open non-compartmentalized spaces are a recipe for hot spots - areas of turbulence with higher temperatures." and then cited a server room article talking about cooling air taking the path of least resistance -- going under the floor in a server room, instead of through rack mounted servers.
    Fact: Lots of open space for large, slow moving fans to keep a video editing box cool is a great way to go
    You stated: "Full towers - in themselves - are worse for cooling"
    Fact: That is one crazy indefensible statement!
    I seriously doubt that you fully comprehend the differences and importance of thermal conductivity, heat capacity, conduction, convection, and radiation for you to make the statements that you have so far and these are the staples for discussing how heat transfer takes place.
    Note to other readers... There are lots of ways to cool components including cpus, hard drives, gpus and memory. I suspect that the noise levels brought by servers and some gamers would be totally offensive to the ambient noise level that you want in the room with you for video editing. Therefore we are left with just a few quiet alternatives: 1) lots of volume at low velocity (large cases, large fans, slow rpm), 2) liquid cooling, and 3) Cases with doors or baffles to keep the sound from a noisier solution from getting back to your ears.
    Regards,
    Jim

  • Need to upgrade my hardward...advice please?

    BeeJay just answered a similar question, but this is slightly different. Help is appreciated...
    The new Mac Pros are up, which I'm sure we've all seen, and I have been holding out.
    I'm running currently, Logic 7, on dual 2.3G processors, on a G5, 10.4.11
    I'm budgeting around $2500, and I'm going to upgrade to Logic 8.
    Should I go with the the brand new Quad-Core
    Mac Pro Quad Core
    One 2.66GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon "Nehalem" processor
    3GB (three 1GB) memory 640GB hard drive 1 18x double-layer SuperDrive
    or macmall.com is selling the (now older)
    Mac Pro 8-Core Workstation - 2 Quad-Core 2.8GHz Intel Xeon Processors, 2GB RAM, 320GB HD, 16x SuperDrive, OS X 10.5 Leopard
    You know what I mean? I could go with the quad core brand spanking new with more memory but one less processor, or go with the older dual quad core for the same price. Will I be frustrated with the older one because it becomes obsolete now, or will I be frustrated with the single quad core?
    Any advice???Please?

    Sorry pmelley if I sounded rough about it. I said you cant go wrong with either choice. My point was that any new Mac Pro you buy will not be obsolete for a long time. You used the word FRUSTATED and I was trying to CALM your CONCERN. I also get STRESSED when I buy electronics because I also do alot of research. I spent alot for my 8 core and my extra RAM so I know how you feel. Just remember these new Macs are way ahead of any software currently available. Once again I apologize.
    Paco The Dancer

  • Can I use my New Imac as a server and a workstation/client at the same time ?

    I havea  brand new (2 months Old) Imac - 4 Gig, fully loaded and want to use it as a server using lion server app.  I want to use it for ical server, Addressbook and fileshareing with a bit more security.  I dont want to buy a new computer, just use the existing one to do these services.  At the same time, I want to still use this computer for my regular work. 
    There will be a few users with low traffic.  At the beggining, there will be only 1 other user for the calander, addressbook and file server.  Later it might grow to 4.
    Any thoughts would be appreciated !!!
    PS - Any advice on how to set this up or tricks would be appreciated
    Thanks Again

    Arik From Tel Aviv wrote:
    great Idea !!  Lets assume I dont want to go virtual - what is your thought on that ?
    Lion Server is a "layer" on top of client. The services run in the background and do consume resources like the RAM, CPU, and HD, while you're using the computer as a client. That said, when running a VM with say VMWare Fusion you dedicate Cores and RAM to VM, even if the VM doesn't need all the CPU horsepower or RAM for your server tasks. So it may be that running a full blown Lion Server as VM along side client is more resource intensive on your computer than just running Lion Server while also using it as a workstation.

  • Need your advices on MacBook Pro Retina

    Hi all !
    I'm in the market for getting a new laptop.
    To put you in context, I'm a student studying electronics. Normally, I know what I'm talking about ;-) lol
    I work as a park supervisor. I could not get a better summer job since I can study while working ! Every day, I sits in the park, turn on my laptop and start coding, reading and studying. Being paid to study is sincerly amazing ! ahah !
    So, I study most of the time in the park, on my laptop.
    I also have a powerful workstation (Asus P8P67 WS Revolution, Core i7 2700K 4.5 GHz, Asus GeForce GTX 680 DirectCUII, 16 GB RAM, RAID 0 SSD, a beautiful monster) for long works and coding session. I also do a lot of virtualization with VMWare Workstation. In fact, I've built a virtualization concept which segregates each tasks in different VMs.
    But, my laptop is an essential tool for me because I use it as much as my workstation. I'm used to carry it at school and at work. So usage is about 50/50 between my Workstation and my laptop.
    I started learning the CUDA API and massively parrallel programming. I bought the Cuda By Example book ( http://www.amazon.ca/CUDA-Example-Introduction-General-Purpose-Programming/dp/01 31387685 ). My Asus UL30VT has a CUDA-Capable GPU in it, along with the integrated Intel chipset. So I setup everything for Visual Studio, install the nVIDIA SDK, and start programming.
    Here comes the trouble.
    Neither Visual Studio nor the nVIDIA SDK (which contains code samples) see the GeForce G210M in my laptop.
    I searched a little over the internet and found that the integration of the graphics processors in this laptop is the worst kind of integration ever built in a laptop. The GPU switching technology is the "beta" version of the nVIDIA Optimus technology. The video drivers are more than obselete (197.xx driver version!!!!) and no more recent version is available, even with tweaks.
    Absolutely no CUDA code would run in my laptop.
    Sure, I could code on my workstation. But it's summer, and being stuck in the house basement while it's sunny outside ... ***** ... lol
    And as I said, since I study most of the time (~90%) in my park, it's not very usefull to have a laptop that cannot do what you want anymore...
    So I started my research to find a new laptop that would fit my needs. Easier to say than to do...
    There is one month, Apple has announced the new MacBook Pro 15 Retina Edition.
    I went in an Apple Store to take a look at these nothing else than piece of art.
    And you'll guess it : I've fallen in love with this machine.
    Thin, lightweight, good battery life, incredible display, amazing hardware. Everything on this laptop is incredible. Even the price ..................
    Sure, the non-retina display is also a good machine, but being used to an ultraportable laptop (pre-ultrabook fashion), I would like it to be has thin and light as possible. And the non-retina has less high-end hardware too...
    Since I saw this machine, the idea of getting one haunts me!
    I tell myself that I could do more shots with one rock. I could learn the OS X environment which is, according to everyone who has an Apple computer, the best working environment ever created. And since I do a lot of virtualization but never could do this with my ultra-low-voltage CPU, the MacBook would also enable this possibility.
    More and more programmers are adopting OS X to code. nVIDIA has also said that the new MacBook is one of the best CUDA development platform.
    ( http://blogs.nvidia.com/2012/06/new-macbook-pros-make-for-great-cuda-dev-platfor ms/ ). Sure, I have a long road to go throught before being a real developper, but as you might have seen, I like to work on things that really work well.
    So, the 2700$-question : according to you and all the details I wrote here, does a MacBook Pro would be a nice choice for me ?
    For this price (in Canadian dollars, I live in Montreal, Quebec), I have the MacBook, the Apple Care for 3 years and VMWare Fusion. It's a 400$-discount that I get because I'm a student (200$ on the machine, 100 $ on the Apple Care, and a 100$ gift card to get the iWork Suite and other softwares if needed).
    The Non-Retina model is not an option, since I must upgrade it with SSD, 8 GB RAM et would like a better screen resolution. With all these upgrades, it's even pricier than the Retina which come more equiped.
    I've looked to other laptop manufacturers too. Dell offers the XPS 15, but it's bulkier, doesn't feature has much as the MacBook, and I would not pay 1900 $ for a "Dell"......... Lenovo makes great laptop too, but I don't know ... Thinkpad are sure the reference as business laptops, but are heavy and bulky. Maybe I've missed a model... The IdeaPad is a nice ultrabook, but once again, it's an Ultra low voltage CPU, so virtualization would be so-so I guess... And Asus has nothing really exciting avalaible at NCIX (the main Asus online reseller in Canada and also the online shop where I buy all my system components).
    One other thing : with all non-Mac laptops, I'm at the "mercy" of the manufacturer regarding GPU drivers, just like my Asus UL30VT... Most of the time, the Verde drivers would not install and you get the very nice message "Please refere to your laptop manufacturer for drivers" ......... -_-"
    I request your experience and advice to clarify my choice.
    Thank you very much !!!

    I was going to try to convince you to go with a PC notebook, but I know nothing about them. As you're concerned about weight, CUDA development, etc., I think that the MBP-R would be an excellent choice. I'm in a wheelchair and carry my MBP around in my backpack on back of my chair, so I don't worry about weight too often...
    It sounds as if you're bright enough to be able to learn new things quickly, so there's no need, I think, to go with the usual "if you're already familiar with Windows, why not... etc."
    It also sounds as if you've both thought things through and have decided on what you need. My opinion? Go with your gut feelings and thoughts. Just remember that you're going to be on the bleeding edge, somewhat. There are some here who have had problems with their new MBP's - and not just the Retina models. But then, we don't hear about the thousands (tens of thousands?) out there who are having no problems.
    Three things to remember - if you have trouble with your new computer during the first two weeks, Apple will replace it, refund your money, whatever. Second, AppleCare (which I always buy) extends your one year warranty and 90-day phone support to a three year warranty with three years of phone support. And third, this is a large community and there will always be someone here who can help you through minor glitches you may have.
    Go with your gut - get that new MacBook Pro with Retina display. I'm sure that you'll be happy with it. I would go ahead, though, and pay the $79 for the external USB SuperDrive - not to carry around with you but just as insurance should you ever need an optical drive.
    Best of luck,
    Clinton

  • I need advice on buying a new computer and monitor.

    Without going into huge detail, I am ready to buy a new desktop for my photography hobby.  I am still running
    CS3 (hoping that will work with Windows 7?), Corel Paint Shop Pro X (yeah, I know I have really old software, but I
    don't feel the need to upgrade just yet), Picasa, and all the software that comes with my Canon 40D.  I take all my pics in
    .raw and then edit/convert.  I have a 1 terabyte eternal drive where I store my photos, but editing from that source is S-L-O-W.
    Someone mentioned on another site something about aneSata drive.  Need more info. (I want an easy way to backup my
    photos monthly, because I have a fear of someone breaking in my home, stealing my pc and then all my photos are gone.
    With the external drive, I can put it in my safe deposit box.)
    I want a monitor (preferably not widescreen) that will be accurate with color and not have a glare, maybe 20" or so.  I print photos at home on my HP Photosmart printer, but I also have some printed professionally.  I would like recommendations on monitor calibration gadgets/software
    so that what I see is very close to what will print.
    This computer will have MSOffice 2010 on it. Will have quite a few other softwares on it that are currently on my old pc.
    We don't watch movies on the PC or do any gaming so the video card will mainly be used for photography and some light video use.  We do skype.
    Would like to stay in the range of $1500-2000 if possible.  I've basically purchased Dell's in the past due to the ease of designing my system,
    but I have had two lemons and am certainly not tied to Dell.
    I know I want a wireless mouse/keyboard.  Currently have Dell Speakers 5/1, which are decent enough for my use, as long as I can connect them to my
    new PC.
    Thanks for good advice!!  (And I want this PC to last me about 5 years so I would guess I need at least 8 g ram, 3.5 GHz processor, preferably Intel.
    Also want 4 or more USB ports on the front or side, as my PC location is not suitable to use the back ports easily.)   Thank you!

    picture-me wrote:
    Would like to stay in the range of $1500-2000 if possible.
    I've taken quite a "non-standard" approach to this...  a little while back I purchased a powerful Dell Precision T5400 workstation that's come off lease from eBay, then populated it with good hardware.  Result?  Dual quad core Xeon 3.16 GHz 16 GB system with 3 TB of internal RAID disk storage and a good modern video card for about $1500.  This is a system that would have sold new for probably $6,000 just a few years ago.
    I didn't have to buy any of the external stuff (monitor, backup drives, keyboard/mouse, etc.) because I upgraded from an existing workstation and was able to re-use all that stuff, plus one 1 TB drive from the old system - which I then sold for $700 to recoup some of the cost (total outlay was then only $800).
    I describe the system and how I put it together in some detail here:
    http://forums.adobe.com/thread/827500
    This is a far more powerful system than anything I could get new for the same price.
    Just a quick glance at eBay and I see that some T5500 workstations are becoming available for reasonable prices now.  I see, for example, a dual quad system with 12 GB of RAM for a Buy It Now price of a hair over $1000.
    -Noel

  • Advice sought for a new PC build

    Hello,
    I could use a little advice about an "as silent as silent can be" system that I am trying to put together right now. I plan to build it myself. I have installed / replaced components in PC systems before but it will be the first time I build a PC from scratch.
    Purpose of PC
    To blitz anything that CS6 can throw at it right now and still be putting up a respectable fight when CS11 is eventually released. In order of importance, the system needs to excel at:
    Video editing and effects using Premiere and AfterEffects
    3D animation using Autodesk 3DS Max etc
    Multimedia content authoring    (Flash, Photoshop, Illustrator, Fireworks, Dreamweaver)
    Music production     (Propellerhead Reason, REAPER)
    Internet browsing, emails, iTunes and all other 21st century time-wasting activities.
    Before I place any orders, I would appreciate it if you would let me know if you can see anything that I might have forgotten, any potential incompatibility issues or just any terrible decisions that I really need to rethink.
    Components
    Windows Professional  64bit OS
    Do I need Ultimate?
    Corsair Obsidian Series 550D Quiet Mid-Tower Case
    Is this case cool and quiet. Are there better options than this that don’t look like either a teenage warrior’s wet dream or a hotel minibar?
    Corsair Professional Series AX 760 Watt ATX/EPS Fully Modular 80 PLUS Platinum PSU
    Honestly I have no idea. I picked it because it is highly rated for efficiency and should go with the case. Are there better options at a similar price point, especially in terms of heat / noise / known reliability issues?
    Intel  Core i7-3930K 6-Core Processor
    I am definitely going with this CPU. I think.
    Corsair 120mm Hydro Series H80i Digital High Performance Liquid CPU Cooler
    I chose this rather than the 100i because it can exhaust out the back of the case. I think this will be a better configuration for the case I have chosen and the location where the PC will live.
    Asus P9X79 PRO Motherboard (Socket 2011, Intel X79 chipset)
    It has all the features I want except on-board firewire which is not a deal breaker and has had good reviews. Can anyone recommend something better at a similar price point? Is it worth spending more to get a higher specified / workstation grade motherboard?
    Asus Nvidia GeForce 2GB GTX 670 DirectCU II Graphics Card
    Supposedly one of the quietest GTX670 cards on the market and ought to be fully compatible with the motherboard.
    Pioneer BDR-208DBK 15X SATA Blu-ray writer
    Storage Components
    Corsair Vengeance Vengeance Performance 32GB DDR3 1866MHz CL10 (4 x 8GB) RAM
    I am also considering getting 64GB and using 32 – 40GB as a RAM disk. Good idea? No?
    Corsair Force Series 3 GT 180GB SSD  
    Windows OS, Programs and Pagefile(s).
    Corsair Force Series 3 GT 180GB SSD  
    Caches, Previews, Temporary files for all CS6 programs
    4 x WD Caviar Black 1TB in RAID 10 configuration
    Media files, project files, exported / rendered files, sample library. Is it worth getting a dedicated RAID controller or should the motherboard be able to handle this without hurting performance elsewhere?
    1 x WD Caviar Black 1TB
    Everything else.
    My budget is reasonably flexible but I do not want to waste money on components that offer only minimal performance benefits.  Also, I have no plans at present to get into overclocking etc. Far too scary for a newbie.
    If you made it this far, thank you for taking the time to read this and any advice at all would be very much appreciated.
    Regards
    Michael

    Hello
    I finished my build at the weekend and installed the OS and so far the process has been much better than I could have hoped for. Thank you for all of your help.
    The computer is much faster and quieter than any computer I have ever owned before and (touch wood) is a joy to use. The Windows Experience rating is 7.8.
    I am still running through checks to make sure everything is OK before installing the rest of the software but I have come across one issue that I think I ought to double check before I get in too deep.
    So far I have connected 4 drives to the Intel SATA controller of my ASUS P9X79 Deluxe motherboard set to RAID mode:
    Samsung 840 Pro 128GB SSD    ---- Not in RAID
    Samsung 840 Pro 256GB SSD    ---- Not in RAID
    2 x WD Black 500GB SSD in RAID 0
    Pioneer Bluray Re-Writer BDR-208DBK
    I have a WD Black 2TB waiting to be added to the system for non performance-critical storage once I am certain that I don't have an issue with set up.
    I have 32GB of RAM installed.
    I have installed and run the Samsung Magician software and the performance benchmarks for the drives are:
    Seq Read 128K
    Seq Write 128K
    Random Read 4K
    Random Write 4K
    Test Range
    Samsung 840 Pro 128GB
    533
    226
    88655
    4788
    1GB
    Samsung 840 Pro 256GB
    534
    263
    91169
    4956
    1GB
    2 x WD Black RAID 0
    241
    265
    2610
    1462
    100MB
    The SSD read speeds look fine  but write speeds seem to be very low to me, certainly much lower than the speeds quoted by Samsung and confirmed in multiple reviews.
    Does this look OK to you and if not, do you have any ideas about how I could improve SSD write performance?
    So far I have followed the steps in the following guide to SSD/HDD optimization for Windows 7 to no avail (checked for latest firmware and drivers, turned off indexing, disabled hibernation, checked that TRIM is enabled, shrank page file to 4GB on OS drive, changed power options so drives never sleep .... have I missed anything?):
    http://www.overclock.net/t/1156654/seans-windows-7-install-optimization-guide-for-ssds-hdd s
    Finally, does the RAID drive's performance look ok.
    I am suspicious that the write performance of the SSDs seems to be pegged to the write performance of the RAID, although that might be just coincidence.
    One last thing, and thanks for your patience.
    I am tempted to switch back to AHCI mode in the BIOS and re-run the benchmarks to see if the SATA RAID mode is the problem. This won't be too much of a hassle as the system is empty at present.
    But if / when I return to  RAID mode, I shouldn't have to do any pre-installing because the RSTe drivers are now already installed and up to date, is this correct?
    My apologies if these issues have been covered before in the forum. I have looked but I couldn't find anything specific.
    Regards
    Michael

  • Just looking for some advice for a Networking 'noob'

    Hey folks,
    I manage the post-production workflow for a small agency. We're getting ready to move into a new office space, and we'll be looking to make some upgrades to our video workflow and data management.
    At the current time, we have two G5s (PowerPCs) and a new Intel Mac Pro. We may be adding a fourth (or even fifth) workstation. We shoot everything on the DVX (24p DV), but we're also (strongly) considering upgrading to an HD workflow and investing in a few HVX packages so we can have the option of shooting 720p. We will NOT be shooting anything higher than that, (no uncompressed, digibeta, no 1080p, etc.)
    Right now, when we need to access media from other computers, we simply use the AppleTalk feature of our internal ethernet and mount the drives remotely. This actually works fairly well, and we usually don't have any issues with latency. But it becomes frustrating at times when we want to search for a particular media file or FCP project file and we can't remember which drive it was stored on. We'd like to have all of our editing workstations be able to access the same media simultaneously in one shared 'Mother Ship.'
    I guess my question is: What should we get? Final Cut Server? G-Raid? Xsan?
    I'm not really an IT guy, so I can't say I really know the differences between these different options, but any advice you can offer would be most appreciated.
    And as for budget, we're prob looking to spend something in the range of $8,000-$10,000 dollars on this new system. (that's NOT including the HVXs, of course.
    qp

    Ok... here we go, not sure what you are doing except editing DV right now,
    but this will work for HDV, DVCPROHD, Uncompressed SD and some ProRes
    as long as you have a good Gigabit Router to transfer files. Please consult
    a professional if this sounds scary to you.
    *Redundant FILE SERVER* for project files, important stuff
    1. Install at least 4GB RAM in G5 #1 (max $200)
    3. Make sure there are two identical SATA drives in the G5. Install OSX Leopard Server ($499) on 1 drive. Use Carbon Copy Cloner (Free... http://www.bombich.com/software/ccc.html) and clone
    the main drive to SATA drive #2 when drive #1 is set up completely. Use drive #2 as backup.
    4. Connect CalDigit 2.56TB HDOne External Hard Drive Array (RAID-5) with PCI-X adapter ($2830)
    SubTotal: $3600...ish
    *Current MacPro* Add unprotected scratch disk for main edit suite
    1. Install Sonnet Tempo SATA e4p Serial ATA Host Adapter ($260)
    2. Connect Sonnet 2.5TB Fusion D500P eSATA Array System (RAID-0) ($1700)
    Subtotal: $2000...ish
    *2nd G5* convert to p2 Logging/backup Station
    1. Sony BWU-200S Internal 4x Blu-ray Disc Rewritable Drive (599.95)
    2. Roxio Toast ($85)
    SubTotal: $700
    *NEW Intel MacPro* will increase productivity
    1. 8 Core 3ghz Intel MacPro ($3600)
    Total: Around 9900-10,000
    (Buy from PowerMax.com or other out of state vendor to avoid sales tax)
    If you want to organize things, then FCS will help. You can install
    on G5#2 for 999.00 more. I would focus on hardware first though.

  • Disk configuration and workflow help needed for lab video workstation

    Hi All,
    Setting up a video editing workstation for a research lab that will use Premeire to edit AVCHD Progressive clips (sometimes with 2 streams side-by-side, but usually single-camera) and export them to .mp4 for later viewing by video coders. We won't be using AfterEffects or adding anything to the videos other than some text (titles, maybe sub-titles).
    The other purpose of this workstation is to act as a file server and backup system for other machines in the lab. Coders will be viewing the exported videos via other networked machines and working with Microsoft Office files that will be stored on the workstation's other HDDs. I'll have a physical backup drive and cloud backup via CrashPlan.
    I've built a machine that is probably overkill, but the client (my wife) wanted it to be "fast," and the purpose of the machine might change in the future:
    i7-4770K (overclocked a bit)
    16GB RAM
    Asus Z87-Pro
    GeForce GTX 660
    I have the OS (W7) and programs on a 256 GB Samsung 840 Pro SSD and currently have two 1TB Velociraptors to use for the Premiere workflow. I'm trying to figure out how to proceed with the purchase of the rest of the drives, and I want to keep the Premiere drives separate from the large storage drives from the lab that are networked and synced to cloud backup.
    Following the recommendations for a three-disc configuration I've picked up on these forums, I could set it up like this:
    C: (256GB SSD) (OS, programs, pagefile)
    D: (1TB HDD) (media, projects)
    E: (1TB HDD) (previews, media cache, exports)
    F: (4TB HDD) (backups of media, projects, and exports and storage of other research files)*THIS DRIVE WOULD BE SHARED ON THE NETWORK
    G: (4TB external HDD) (backup of F & drive that backs up to CrashPlan)
    but it seems that would be a waste of the speed of the second 10k velociraptor. If I added another SSD and RAIDed the Velociraptors it would be:
    C: (256GB SSD) (OS, programs)
    D: (Two 1TB Velociraptors in RAID 0) (media, projects)
    E: (256GB SSD) (media cache, pagefile)
    but would I then need to add another dedicated HDD for previews and exports, or could I store those on the networked F: from above (which would be previews, exports, backups of media and projects, and storage of other research files) without taking a speed hit?
    It seems overkill to have a dedicated drive for exports and previews (let's make that the new F:), then have them copy to the first 4TB drive (now G:), then back that up to the second 4TB drive (now H:), then back that up to CrashPlan. However, people might be accessing that network drive at any time, and I don't want that to slow any part of the video process down.
    I appreciate any advice ya'll can give me!

    Hi Jim,
    Thanks for the encouraging response. I'm leaning toward the non-SSD option at this point. 
    To make sure I understand, are you suggesting I try using the Velociraptor Raid 0 in the 2 disk configuration suggested by Harm's Guidelines for Disk Usage chart? Like this:
    C: (256 GB SSD) (OS, Programs, Pagefile, Media Cache)
    D: (1TB x2 in RAID 0) (Media, Projects, Previews, Exports)?
    Where I'm still confused there, and in looking at Harm's array suggestions for 5 or more drives, is how performance is affected by having simultaneous read/write operations happening on the same drive, which is what I understood was the reason for spreading out the files on multiple drives. Maybe I don't understand how Premiere's file operations work in practice, or maybe I don't understand RAID 0 well enough.
    In the type of editing we'll be doing (minimal) aren't there still times when Premiere will be trying to read and write from the D: drive at the same time, for example during export? Wouldn't the increased speed benefits of RAID 0 for either read or write alone be defeated by asking the array to do both simultaneously?
    Maybe the reason the Media Cache is on the SSD in the above configuration is because that is what will be read while writing to something like Exports? But that wouldn't make sense given Harm's chart, which has the Media Cache also located on the array....
    Another question is, given that the final home of the exported videos will be on the big internal drive (4TB) anyway, could I set it up like this:
    C: (SSD) (OS, Programs, Pagefile, Media Cache)
    D: (2TB RAID 0) (Media, Projects, Previews)
    E: (network shared 4TB HDD) (Exports + a bunch of other shared non-video files)
    so I don't end up having to copy the exported videos over to the 4TB drive? Do you think it would render significantly faster to the RAID than it would to the 7200 rpm 4TB drive? I'd like to cut out the step of copying exported videos from D: to E: all the time if it wasn't necessary.
    Thanks again.

  • New Workstation - System and Storage Critique Please

    Hi. I'm finalizing a new workstation config and would appreciate your advice.   Since I'm not a photo/video pro, this workstation will be used for multiple purposes:
    Video Editing (CS3 now; CS5 when released)
    Photo Editing (CS3 now; CS5 when released)
    Sotftware Development
    Stock data processing (custom app, processing daily data)
    Office and Personal Apps (Email, web browsing, personal finance)
    Below is my system config.   I'd appreciate any feedback that you have on the config, especially the disk config with an eye towards getting decent performance for editing AVCHD (w/Premiere) and still images (w/PhotoShop).
    To limit upfront expenses, I'm thinking software RAID 0 instead of hardware RAID.   A nightly (or more often) file backup would copy files to a Backup Drive.   A weekly backup would copy files over our network to a small server.   As projects becames stale, they would be copied to a removable archive disk (currently 500Gb).
    Some specific questions:
    I understand that Hardware RAID is better than software RAID.   If I start with a software RAID now, will there be any issues with upgrading to a Hardware RAID (like an Areca ARC-1210)?
    As you can see below, I'm thinking of moving the Paging File to a separate disk.  I'm thinking of a 150Gb Raptor or maybe an older 80Gb disk that I have laying around.   Does this disk have to be fast?
    I've seen several comments about buying WD RE4 (WE2003FYYS) disks are better for RAID that WD Caviar Black.   Are the RE4 cost effective for amateur use?
    Thanks,
    Dan.
    OS                              Win 7 Pro
    CPU                            Core I7-920 (OC’d to 3.8Ghz)
    CPU Cooler                 CORSAIR Water Cooling - Hydro Series CWCH50-1
    Mainboard                   ASUS P6X58D Premium
    Memory                       12 GB Mushkin Enhanced Redline DDR3 1600
    Video Card                  nVidia GeForce 9600 GT
    Power Supply              CORSAIR 850W
    Disk Controller            Intel ICH10R controller (6 x SATA 3.0 Gb/s ports) w/ RAID 0,1,5,10
                                       Marvell® PCIe SATA 6Gb/s controller (2 x SATA 6.0 Gb/s ports)
    System & App Disk     WD 300GB Velociraptor #1
    Paging File Disk          WD 150GB Raptor or maybe old 80Gb disk
    Backup Storage          1X Western Digital Caviar Green WD20EARS 2TB
    Removable Archive     1x 500Gb
    Other Disk                   Maxtor 6Y200P0 200Gb (currently owned, but not sure what to do with it
    Video Config:
    2X Western Digital Caviar Black 2TB configured RAID 0*:
    - Video Capture         
    - Preview Files
    - Sound File
    - Final Results
    * Or maybe WD RE4 2TB
    WD 300GB Velociraptor #2:
    - Project Files

    My suggestion is use another older computer for your non-video and non-photo apps.  That way you can minimize the processes on the video/photo machine and obtain maximum performance.on it and have maximum security and safety on your Internet/business machine.  If you want a common keyboard, mouse and video display get a KVM switch like I am using.  One of the biggest problems I see in analyzing the PPBM4 results that I get regularly is way to many processes/services running on machines people are trying to use as editing machines.

  • Best Practice Advice - Using ARD for Inventorying System Resources Info

    Hello All,
    I hope this is the place I can post a question like this. If not please direct me if there is another location for a topic of this nature.
    We are in the process of utilizing ARD reporting for all the Macs in our district (3500 +/- a few here and there). I am looking for advice and would like some best practices ideas for a project like this. ANY and ALL advice is welcome. Scheduling reports, utilizing a task server as opposed to the Admin workstation, etc. I figured I could always learn from those with experience rather than trying to reinvent the wheel. Thanks for your time.

    hey, i am also intrested in any tips. we are gearing up to use ARD for all of our macs current and future.
    i am having a hard time with entering the user/pass for each machine, is there and eaiser way to do so? we dont have nearly as many macs running as you do but its still a pain to do each one over and over. any hints? or am i doing it wrong?
    thanks
    -wilt

  • What is the best way to backup four Lion workstations

    I have several Mac OS Lion Workstations and have used Retrospect in the past to backup, and (with poor success) restore missing files and complete drives. I had a recent failures of this concept/system and would like some advice about what can work better.
    My (client) Mac Systems all on Lion 10.7.1 unless noted otherwise:
    MacPro (1,1) with two internal 500GB, 250GB HD
    MacBook (2,1) 500GB HD
    MacBook Pro (6,2) internal 500GB HD
    MacMini (3,1) <- runs OS X10.6.8 at this time; internal 180GB, 1.0TB IEEE FW800 attached HD of music, movies and documents set up to serve to Apple TV.
    Currently available storage for backup:
    JBOD disks: 2x1.5TB, 1.0T
    GigE network wired connections
    Apple Airport Extreme wireless network 802.11b/g/n
    Currently running backup applications:
    Time Machine using the JBOD disks to backup entire client machine
    Parallels virtual media cloning (CCC)
    Applications cloning (CCC) on each system
    Purpose/needs of a unified network backup:
    Maintain an incremental backup using minimal storage to quickly retrieve missing files for a minimum of 30 days prior to a loss by error or failure of the internal connected storage system.
    Maintain a backup of entire drive snapshot in the event of disasterous failure of the entire system, or cloning a complete system onto a new / replacement machine, with or without a OS installed.
    Maintain (possibly) separate storage of a virtual OS- Parallels 6, as the incremental backup is by design limited to a clone of the virtual machine.
    Maintain a separate storage of items like applications so that space on the incremental backup can be conserved.

    When I was using 10.4.1, which was years ago, I used SuperDuper.
    Allan

  • Connecting to SCVMM remotely via install on workstation cannot run console windows to VMs (locally on scvmm it works)

    We recently installed a SCVMM 2012 machine and connected it to a few HyperV2012 hosts.
    From the SCVMM console locally on the machine it is installed on, I can connect to the Console of the VMs on the remote HyperV machines.  However for some reason when I run it remotely from my workstation, I can connect to SCVMM just fine, but connecting
    to the console of the VMs gives me the error:
    Virtual Machine Manager lost the connection to the virtual machine for one of the following reasons:
    Another connection was established to the console of this manchine.
    The virtual machine has been shut down or put into the saved state.
    The user credentials do not have the necessary privilege to connect.
    0x0003, 0x0000
    The firewall is not detecting any dropped packets (I enabled logging) and I am logging in with the same user as I do locally to the SCVMM server, so it is not permissions.
    Any advice would be extremely helpful.  Thanks,
    Nicholas

    I also find a matching Success Security Audit for trying (even though it doesnt work):
    An account was successfully logged on.
    Subject:
    Security ID:
    NULL SID
    Account Name:
    Account Domain:
    Logon ID:
    0x0
    Logon Type: 3
    Impersonation Level: Impersonation
    New Logon:
    Security ID:
    DOMAIN\MyNonDomainAccount
    Account Name:
    MyNonDomainAccount
    Account Domain:
    DOMAIN
    Logon ID:
    0x156DC3A5C
    Logon GUID:
    {bcdbadca-0910-a383-c130-2b86551f6d33}
    Process Information:
    Process ID:
    0x0
    Process Name:
    Network Information:
    Workstation Name:
    Source Network Address:
    Source Port:
    Detailed Authentication Information:
    Logon Process:
    Kerberos
    Authentication Package:
    Kerberos
    Transited Services:
    Package Name (NTLM only):
    Key Length:
    0

  • Need some graphics card advice for using 3D and Adobe

    Below are the specs for the workstation I just bought. I'm planning on upgrading the graphics card to a GeForce GTX 570 (Fermi) 1280MB. The chassis is pretty small, and I'm concerned that it might get too hot. Does anyone have any advice as to whether this machine can handle this card, and whether or not I should by extra fans, or a water cooling system for the card? Thanks in advance!
    Processor & Memory:
    Intel® Core™ i7-2600 Processor (3.40GHz)  
    Intel® H67 Chipset  
    16GB DDR3 Memory (4 slots, 32GB MAX)
      Drives: 
    2TB SATA II Hard Drive  
    12X Blu-ray Rewritable Drive: Read AND Write CDs/DVDs/Blu-Ray Discs  
    Front Panel 19-in-1 digital multimedia card reader
      Graphics: 
    Integrated Intel® HD Graphics (dual monitor capable)
      Communications: 
    10/100/1000 Mb/s Gigabit  LAN
      Audio: 
    Flexible 8-channel audio with jack sensing
      Keyboard & Mouse: 
    USB Keyboard  
    USB Mouse
      Expandability (total bays/slots): 
    2 x 5.25" external (1 occupied)  
    1 x 3.5" external (1 occupied)  
    4 x 3.5" internal (1 occupied)  
    1 x PCI-Ex16   
    2 x PCIe x1
      Ports: 
    1x DVI  
    1x HDMI  
    2 x USB 3.0 ports (rear)  
    6 x USB 2.0 ports (2 Front, 4 Rear)  
    3 x Audio Ports  
    1x S/PDIF out  
    1x RJ45
      Operating System: 
    Genuine Microsoft Windows® 7 Home Premium, 64-bit
      Additional Software: 
    Microsoft® Office Starter (reduced functionality versions of Word and Excel; not the full version of Microsoft® Office 2010)  
    Symantec Norton Internet Security 2011 (60-day trial)
      Additional Information: 
    Dimensions: (HxWxD):  13.9" x 7.1" x 16.9" (approx.)  
    Power supply: 350W  
    Lifetime, 24/7 toll-free phone support  
    1 Year Limited Parts & Labor Warranty  
    Email and fax support M-F from 9am-6pm EST

    Here are the major failings of that "workstation":
    1) The power supply is much too weak to handle an upgrade to a GTX 570. Heck, that PSU might not have been capable of actually handling even its claimed 350W - but more like 200W. As such, it's barely capable of handling even that "workstation"'s base configuration with integrated Intel HD 2000 graphics. You will definitely need a new power supply (at least 550W, but preferably 750W to 850W) right away before you can even upgrade the graphics card at all.
    2) That PC has only one hard disk. Adobe requires a minimum of at least one additional hard disk (preferably two or more additional disks) in order to run Premiere Pro acceptably well.
    3) Change out the H67 motherboard for a Z68 motherboard. H67 cannot overclock the "limited-overclockable" i7-2600 CPU at all. And even with a Z68 motherboard, the fastest that you can run that non-K i7-2600 would be 3.9GHz.
    4) As you stated, that small case will not be enough. You will need a much bigger case to handle the load from Premiere Pro plus all of the hardware upgrades that I'm suggesting.
    Also, keep in mind that the company only offers "lifetime" technical support if you don't tinker with the PC's innards at all - not even a minor hardware upgrade or only for a vendor-approved hardware upgrade such as RAM. Once you open that case for a non-vendor-approved hardware upgrade (e.g. an upgraded power supply, an upgraded GPU or upgraded cooling), you will no longer have technical support from that company that you're getting the PC from.
    As currently equipped, that system will run about 25 to 30 times slower than a fast PC. Look at payal's 622-second result running 5.0.3 on the PPBM5 results list, with the same CPU, chipset and integrated graphics as your system: It is already more than 12 times slower (in terms of the Relative Performance Index) than a fast system - and that system is already running two disks. With only one disk for absolutely everything - the OS, media, projects, previews, cache and exports - it would be much slower than even that because SATA is only a half-duplex interface, not a full-duplex interface. As a half-duplex interface, SATA can only deliver data transfers in one direction at a time. However, video editing programs like PPro require simultaneous reads and writes. This means that the single disk must wait for data transfers in a given direction to be completed before any data starts transferring in the opposite direction.

  • Flat Panel LCD Computer Monitor Advice

    I'm building an FCP workstation and have been thinking about what type of computer monitor to purchase. My current monitor is a bulky CRT, so if anyone has any advice as far as what to look for in an LCD or good brands that have worked well for you it would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Zap
    Dual 2 GHz Power Mac G5 / 2 GB Ram   Mac OS X (10.3.9)  

    hi ya, zappie!
    i've been going through this same thing in my head in preparation for a mac pro in the spring. plus, one of my vga monitors is nigh on ten years old and needs to be retired.
    i've looked into the dell monitors and the sony's and the apple 23 inch models. can't say that i'm overly impressed with any of these and especially the apple displays when reading posts about past and present color cast problems and other imaging issues.
    one model i need to demo before i purchase anything is this particular display, http://www.eizo.com/products/graphics/ce240w/index.asp
    read some nice reviews on this display and the five year warranty is nice as well.
    cheers!
    zeb

Maybe you are looking for

  • Mail gone, wont quit or display anything after update...

    Hi Folks, In the process of helping my dad upgrade his G4 mini to 10.5.6 from 10.4.something. He's on dialup still so screen sharing to get him going is not really an option and I"m trying to help him with this over the phone and it's slow going. The

  • How to create a filter based on Effective date EFFDT

    Hello to all, I am currently creating reports from an HR database that stores records by employee (EMPLID) based on effective date(EFFDT) and Effective Sequence (EFFSEQ). It is easy to get a report that shows all entries up to a certain data (using <

  • Run time error 2147467259

    Hello, while opening a query/ a workbook in the bex I get an error message "Run time error 2147467259 - The method 'position' for the object 'commandbar' was aborted." Somebody has an clue what this is about? I know this error from VBA but I don't kn

  • Random freezes-please, somebody, help me find a solution that works!

    I feel a little stupid posting a new thread for what seems to be (at the moment) a rather common issue, but almost every related thread I've come across seems to pin the blame on different things, and I want to consolidate all that I know about what'

  • List styles not showing up in Conversion Settings dialog

    In linked Frame documents, RoboHelp collapses multi-level unordered lists (bullets and subbullets) to a single flat list. So this in FrameMaker: Fruit Vegetables Carrots Peas Becomes this in RoboHelp: Fruit Vegetables Carrots Peas This happens when I