Worried about whether I made the right decision

I had signed up for BT Infinity on 14-06-2011 and I was moving over from VM so I made a request to move my number over to BT. I had made a upfront payment of £120 to cover the yearly telphone rental charges.
VM came back with "matching" offer but I had attached some conditions to the new offer and said I will only accept the offer if my conditions were met. A few days later unknown to me my BT order got cancelled, which I only came to know when a BT CS called me up to inform me about the cancellation. She assured me that the payment £120 will be refunded to me within 5-7 working days.
I had contacted the online billing chat service twice and each time they told me that the refund has been authorised and I should receive my refund in the next 5-7 working days. I also posted on the billing forum and contacted the mods as suggested. I am yet waiting for somebody get back to me.
I have been waiting for this refund for over 2 weeks now and still no sign of it.
In the meantime VM couldn't "agree" to my conditions so I placed a order once again with BT, which is going to be installed next week.
I never had any billing related problems with VM and they always resolved it without any issues.
BUT now I am worried whether I made the right decision.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

olisun wrote:
I have been promised that the refund will be in my account by Saturday...
My installation is tomorrow... Fingers crossed...
Hope the installation goes smoothly (it should), then you can go down the pub Saturday and celebrate with the £120
toekneem
http://www.no2nuisancecalls.net
(EASBF)

Similar Messages

Hope I made the right decision!!

After at least a couple of weeks of debate and reading these forums minimum of twice a day, I broke down and ordered a refurb 15" 1.67ghz Powerbook vs getting a MacBook Pro. Of course the sudden availability of refurb MacBook Pros at the Apple Store kind of slowed me down but I still went with the PB. I figured as follows:
- PB is last of the PPC series and should be the pinnacle of that technology.
- being a refurb hopefully any of the screen issues etc should have been worked out.
- all my main apps would require Rosetta on the MBP for up to a year (Adobe) and this time will let the MBP get over its growing pains and I won't really be taking any of a performance hit in the mean time.
- the PB still has some desirable features such as the DL Superdrive, PCMCIA slot (I already own some cards that I can't easily replace) etc.
- taking advantage of rebates I saved about $300 vs a refurb MBP which I can use for RAM, etc. Plus I'm not sure how secure I would have been with a refurb early model MBP anyway so the savings might really be closer to $500.
- I can continue to look forward to a MBP down the road while enjoying my PB.
Anyone think I made the wrong decision? Comments welcome.
Powerbook, iMac Mac OS X (10.4.3)

How was your refurbed PB15 when you received it. I have purchased other refurb equipment (iPods, etc) from Apple and it arrived looking like new. I am hoping that any issues with the screen etc will have been repaired/resolved before being sent out to me.
I was thinking about a cinema display with the PB especially to get the double coverage from Applecare. However, I have a 20" G5 iMac which will remain my main machine for the forseeable future with the PB just for travel and when I don't want to work at my desk. Once the whole line-up is out with the Intel processors and has been proven solid then I will re-think my hardware at that time.
I am pretty well committed to the next version of ACS anyway as I skipped CS2 and am still happy using CS1. My other main apps are the MS Office products and I will wait to see if the Intel upgrade is a major feature upgrade as well or just releasing the Universal version.
Powerbook, iMac Mac OS X (10.4.3)
Powerbook, iMac Mac OS X (10.4.3)

My right ear headphones won't work on my iphone 4s. I restored the iphone and set-up as new phone, this made the right ear headphone work fine. But as soon as I restored the iphone from back-up it stopped working. Pls help

My right ear headphones won’t work on my iphone 4s. I restored the iphone and set-up as new phone, this made the right ear headphone work fine. But as soon as I restored the iphone from back-up it stopped working. Pls help

Restore as New...
Redownload your Purchased and Free Apps using the Apple ID you Originally used...
iPhone User Guide
http://manuals.info.apple.com/en_US/iphone_user_guide.pdf

The software is cutting off about 1/4 of the right hand side of the frame. Is there a fix??

the software is cutting off about 1/4 of the right hand side of the frame. Is there a fix??

unrecobc
You said important word "mod". Are you dealing with mod widescreen files? If so, there is a serious problem with them in Premiere Elements 13. I have written about this in detail.
So, let us rule out or in the above before going further.
Please see if the details written about in the following apply to your situation....
ATR Premiere Elements Troubleshooting: PE: 13 Serious Problem With .MOD Widescreen Files
I have also posted a thread here on the subject. But Adobe Staff has not seen it or has not found time to respond to the matter.
Premiere Elements 13 Major .MOD Widescreen Concerns
Please review and consider the above, and let us know if this applies to you.
Thank you.
ATR

BT Infinity - Have i made the right choice?

Hi,
I currently have BT Total Broadband but have today upgraded to BT Infinity which will be installed within two weeks. I have been told that i should recieve a 40mb download and 10mb upload.
The reason for me moving to Infinity was due to the overall speed of the broadband especially with torrents (legal) before anyone asks they downloaded at 2.7kbps on a 2mb line.
Has anyone else made the same move and was it worth it?
Thanks

mikem87 wrote:
Hi,
I currently have BT Total Broadband but have today upgraded to BT Infinity which will be installed within two weeks. I have been told that i should recieve a 40mb download and 10mb upload.
The reason for me moving to Infinity was due to the overall speed of the broadband especially with torrents (legal) before anyone asks they downloaded at 2.7kbps on a 2mb line.
Has anyone else made the same move and was it worth it?
Thanks
Ok, BT have never published and will unlikely too on what port clamping is in place at particular parts of the day. However, my friend was upgraded to Infinity (lucky cow) last week and suffored slow speeds. When i went over today (and got a free chinese meal) I change the BT Home Hub 3 wireless settings to transmit a Wireless N signal only, now we are getting about 21mb download speeds and 8Mb upload speeds whereas before we where getting about 10/4 ish
But again, it depends on where you are downloading your 'friends' legal file from and what their upload speeds are and what clamping measures they have on their line!
CG Over An Out

HT3702 Hey am in South Africa an am using a FNB Visa card bt iTunes does not allow me to buy anything they always say it's disinclined but all the information I put in about my card is the right information please help me out

Hey can someone help me fix my account because I can't but anything using my FNB account please I really need help because all the information I puts in is the right one but it tells me disinclined

Have the same problem - im in venezuela

Deciding whether TestStand is the right solution for my company

I'm working at a growing company and we recently started a push in our Test group to try and standardize our future development as much as possible to allow as much re-use of code as possible. I don't want to say exactly what it is we make for confidentiality reasons, but let's just say that 90% of what we make is the same basic type of product, but it comes in literally hundreds of models ranging in size from about the size of a dime to the size of a small washing machine. We're considering switching to TestStand on all new stations and on all updates of previous stations to assist in rapid development with increased efficiency.
Over the years we've made about 20 or so test stations as new versions of our product came out, each able to fit products of a different size and with different test requirements, but because our main products are all so similar to each other, there's only a pool of about 6 different types of tests we need to run, with some products needing only one of those tests and others needing all 6, and plenty in the 2-5 range. The size differences among different products also mean we have a large amount of different power supplies, and for various other reasons the measurement devices for the test stations aren't terribly standardized as well.
Step 1 was that we standardized the database we used to store all of the test data. We now have one database that can store data from all of our test stations in the same way. A few of the old stations had to have some creative workarounds done (i.e. instead of rewriting their current test program, write something that takes their old output format and converts it to the new database format, then upload it), but this step is 100% complete.
Step 2 was to abstract out the most common pieces of hardware, so we have started basically putting the IVI types in a LVOOP wrapper. Now instead of being limited to interchangability among IVI devices we can also swap in any of the other assorted devices we've accumulated over the years, many of which don't have IVI drivers and even a few that don't follow SCPI standards, as this is a great use of inheritance and overrides. We're also implementing a few device types that don't have IVI classes. This effort is already well underway and we're OK here.
Step 3 is where we're at now. As we standardized on hardware interfacing, we also figured it would be a good idea to attempt to effectively write each of the 6 or so tests one last time each with very flexible setup parameters as inputs, using the abstracted hardware classes so that it wouldn't matter which hardware we had, so that all the tests would run the same way. So we started looking at solutions to some form of sequence management, and we came up with a couple of possibilities for homegrown versions but after debating those for a while we started to ask ourselves, "Are we just re-inventing TestStand here?"
We use TestStand on a few stations here already so we had licences for development, but the stations we use it on at the moment fall into the 10% of outliers that we have and are somewhat non-standard. So none of the 6-ish usual tests were used on them and they're for a very different product type, so we never tried to use them with our standardized database. They also were all made before I came on board here, so I don't have much experience with TestStand myself, and I've run into some roadblocks when trying to come up with a framework for how to integrate our standard database and our standard instrument LVOOP classes into a TestStand environment that meets our current and future test requirements.
The first roadblock is that our database standardization and TestStand's built-in reporting don't mesh at all. Right now, all of our test stations use the same "mega-cluster" to store their data in, which is a type-def cluster of all the things our products could ever be tested for on any of our stations. We pass it to a common database write function that writes everything that has changed from the default values (NaN and blank strings\arrays) and ignores the rest, so we don't fill the database with zeroes for the tests we don't do. I do want to emphasize how big this cluster got in order to have all of the potential save values we might ever need in it. It is a cluster of 13 other clusters, the largest of which has 10 items in it, and one of those is a 1-D array of another cluster with 19 elements in it, and one of those elements is another 1-d array with a cluster of 24 units in it. If all of the controls in the mega-cluster are shown on the front panel at once, I can't fit them on 2 full-size 1080p screens at the same time. The context help for the main cluster is 5 screen heights tall just for the listing of all of the elements.
So I really can't see this being integrated with the built-in TestStand reporting system. Additionally, the "Type" system in TestStand appears to be unhelpful when attempting to pass this cluster between steps, and even worse when trying to pass it between sequences. When I add the mega-cluster to it, it also creates over 30 other types, one for each of the other clusters contained inside of it. Within LabVIEW alone this is pretty easy to manage, as we just have a centralized repository of typedefs in source control that gets checked out to a common directory on each computer, as we do minor changes to acommodate new products a few times a year. However, on TestStand, I can't find a method that's the equivalent for just storing a bunch of .ctl files in the same shared directory like we do with LabVIEW. I see that they can be stored in certain INI files or in sequence files. The INI files appear to all be station-specific, and since all of our 20ish test stations have different hardware and capabilities, we can't just synchronize those files. And if I want to pass the mega-cluster type between sequence files that call sub-sequence files, every one of those files will need to be manually updated to get their types to match... and we'lll be needing at least 200 sequence files when we're done, at a guess. Unless there's some method I'm missing here, I don't see how to use TestStand to move this data around. We could use something like just passing it by reference, but then if we do that I don't actually see much of a benefit here of using TestStand instead of just pure LabVIEW as two of the things that TestStand is supposed to handle (reporting steps as pass/fail against limits and reporting and logging the results afterwards). Plus then we have the additional burder of making sure the module holding the reference in LabVIEW doesn't unload before we're done using it.
Is there some better way of handling massively complex types in TestStand that I am not seeing?
There may be more that I'm not seeing yet, but if there isn't a way to handle these massively complex types in TestStand, all we'd be getting out of it is a slightly easier method of managing sequencing than we have now, which I don't see as being worth the investment in time and licenses it would take.
I'd be grateful for any feedback. Thanks!

Considering you already seem to be leveraging LabVIEW heavily and before jumping into TestStand I would look at the PTP Sequencer. This seems to be a cutdown version of TesStand but inside LabVIEW and is a simple install from the LabVIEW Tools network using VIPM.
If you are happy to look at alternative representations then maybe check out NI's StateChart Module or the Open StateChart by Vogel (available as an install from VIPM).
The advantages of any of the above is they will be alot cheaper than TestStand and the required run time licences if you don't require all the power of TestStand (extensible everything).

I'm afraid I made the wrong decision

I happened to bump unto this forum, and I was surprised to see a lot of "Problems" with iPod shuffle. I just purchased one about a week ago, and I hope I didn't make a wrong decision >.<

Right.
Imagine you're an alien and visited a hospital as Wade suggests. That's the first thing you see and everyone there except a few doctors are sick. Oh, no, everyone is sick. If you would have gone outside first and seen a bunch of healthy people, you'd realize the hospital is a small sample. I for one have gotton two members of my family shuffles and they work perfectly. There are also two minis in my family which work perfectly, along with my iPod. This does not include all the people I know. I have not meant one person who's iPod was broken. Only once did someone's iPod not turn on because their brother dropped it. I reset it and bam! it turned on .
Keep in mind that I'm not going to post everyday, "My iPod works great ". That's not why there is a forum here
btabz

Need help with PC build for use with Photoshop CS4 Extended - Have I made the right choices?

Hello,
I'm very new to the inner workings of a PC...this will be first time building one from scratch. I know enough to be dangerous but not enough to be confident. I will use the PC primarily for editing, secondarily for iTunes management. I've heard that I should have, at the very least, an SSD for PS, other apps and the O/S. I'll also have a hard drive for data storage. Do I need yet another SSD for scratch? If so, any recs for one? Also, my current build (which does not include any SSDs) is about $800. What can I skinny down, without sacrificing a huge amount of speed/performance? I am looking for major guidance here...I'm ready to order, but I keep second-guessing my choices. I want to make sure I get this right the first time around. I want this machine to last me a good long while. Any help at all will be HUGELY appreciated!
Here are my current picks:
Part list permalink: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/1bwi
Part price breakdown by merchant: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/1bwi/by_merchant
CPU: Intel Core i5-2500K 3.3GHz Quad-Core Processor ($214.99 @ SuperBiiz)
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P67A-D3-B3 ATX LGA1155 Motherboard ($104.99 @ Newegg)
Memory: G.Skill Ripjaws Series 16GB (4 x 4GB) DDR3-1333 Memory ($85.00 @ Newegg)
Hard Drive: Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive ($49.99 @ Newegg)
Video Card: XFX Radeon HD 6850 1GB Video Card ($129.99 @ Newegg)
Case: Cooler Master Elite ATX Mid Tower Case ($60.00 @ Amazon)
Power Supply: Corsair 500W ATX12V Power Supply ($49.99 @ Newegg)
Optical Drive: Lite-On iHAS124-04 DVD/CD Writer ($19.99 @ SuperBiiz)
Operating System: Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium SP1 (64-bit) ($91.98 @ Amazon)
Total: $806.92
(Prices include shipping and discounts when available.)
(Generated 2011-09-19 18:29 EDT-0400)
Thanks!
Andrea

Make sure the motherboard is the third revision as the earlier two had problems with the i5-2500K (Sandy Bridge)
I prefer Asus motherboards but doesn't mean the Gigabyte is a problem. (I note that it scored 4 eggs...)
May not make a difference in Photoshop but for Premiere the Geforce video cards with GDDR5 are preferred.
The LiteOn iHas 224 does lightscribe which is a nice touch for clients/gifts.
There is no room to save as I would consider your build minimum specs for a nice photoshop experience.
As for SSD drives...my research of reviews and articles makes me feel the technology is not ready for mission critical work. So if you are running a business then I recommend not using SSD drives. Rather look at Raptor 10,000 rpm drive for Windows and Photoshop and use the Spinpoint for storage. If not business then I've read the intel x25 SSD drives are solid but I have no personal experience with them.
Cheers,
Steve

I bought an iMac last year and now have a flashing folder on start up. I tried to reboot but am unclear about whether or not the time machine has backed up everything I have on there or how I can do it so I don't loose important data. Thanks in advance!

My iMac which I bought in May 2011, (yes the warranty for one year just ran out) but I have 3 years through Best Buy, was making a really loud humming noise yesterday so I shut it down and restarted and now I have the flashing folder on a grey screen. I don't know if I have lost everything on that computer as I am not sure if I set up or needed to set up the time machine when I bought it. I am not super mac savvy (yet) and would love some help to try and not only fix this issue but to find out how I can check and see if what I have on there is automatically backed up or not. I need help! Thanks in advance!!!

Do you have an Install Disc?
If so...
"Try Disk Utility
1. Insert the Mac OS X Install disc, then restart the computer while holding the C key.
2. When your computer finishes starting up from the disc, choose Disk Utility from the Installer menu at top of the screen. (In Mac OS X 10.4 or later, you must select your language first.)
*Important: Do not click Continue in the first screen of the Installer. If you do, you must restart from the disc again to access Disk Utility.*
3. Click the First Aid tab.
4. Select your Mac OS X volume.
5. Click Repair Disk, (not Repair Permissions). Disk Utility checks and repairs the disk."
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=106214
Then try a Safe Boot, (holding Shift key down at bootup), run Disk Utility in Applications>Utilities, then highlight your drive, click on Repair Permissions, reboot when it completes.
(Safe boot may stay on the gray radian for a long time, let it go, it's trying to repair the Hard Drive.)
If perchance you can't find your install Disc, at least try it from the Safe Boot part onward.
If 10.7.0 or later...
Bootup holding CMD+r, or the Option/alt key to boot from the Restore partitirion & use Disk Utility from there.

I have a MBP version 10.6.8 and about 2 inches on the right side of the screen is flashing white lines. Is there anything I can do to fix it? And if not how much will it cost to fix?

I have not dropped my computer or anything, but all of a sudden the screen got all messed up. It helped to move the screen back a little bit, but now for it to go away I have to hold the screen. I tried resetting the PRAM, safe boot, repair disk utility, etc. Unfortunately, I do not have applecare. The computer is only 2 years old. Thanks for any help.

The screen is broken. Take it to an Apple Store to fix that

Help me if I made the good decision

I just ordered my first mac.
I choosed to order the higher spec macbook pro 2.53 gigahertz and also upgrade the hardrive to 7200 Rpm. I thought macbook pro is better then the I mac as if needed i can carry it around and i can allways connect and external screen to it , non apple as on big screen i dont like glossy when I am at home.
My order will be shipped in 1-2 weeks, but I slept over it and I kinda think if I need that or not also so many people complain on the macbook pros, like the heat , freezing etc etc
My 7 years old Toshiba still rocks for her age;-) so I would love if an Apple computer would be the same. Are there all those issue for all the macbook pro=s or just simply some of them are wrong?
Second
The reason i bought a higher spec macbook pro is that I can't upgrade later, i will use photoshop on it and windows and make some video editing and some gaming and in the near future i will buy for it a 24inch HD screen.,
With all that you think I need what i ordered? or not ?
I am thinking to cancel...
But I am hesitating
Many thanx guys / girls to help me decide !

I understand why you are choosing higher speed CPU 2.53 to future proof , but the hard drive can be upgraded yourself at a later date IF you need too as can the RAM , if you need it .
These are fast machines at base model .
I'm getting the base 2.4 Macbook pro in a few days and will upgrade the RAM and hard drive if I need too, at a later date .
I'll be using mine for some light photo/video editing , audio production & band promo artwork etc.
I'm expecting no issues at all and will check the machine thoroughly upon arrival ,if there are any problems Apple will sort them out , however ,I envisage an issue free purchase and many years of happy use .

Whether JavaFX is the right choice for my application??

Hi,
I am interested in creating a graphics application. I have bunch of sensors on a table and I want to create different images on the table through a projector hung on ceiling facing down. I am have some values for a gray scale. Say for example I have 250 values then I want the screen to be divided into equal 250 rectangles and each of them will be given a color based on the gray scale value I have. If I have 800 X 600 values then I will have that much resolution of the gray scale image. after certain time the values change and I have to change the image as well.
I thought of using JavaFX but I am not sure should I go with this or there is some other language or tool which will be very helpful in creating application at pixel level?
Samip

Pixel level manipulations is not the strong point of JavaFX.
For the application you describe, I recommend instead using Processing, lot of people use it for shows and exhibitions. And it interfaces well to hardware.

Thinking of getting EyeTV Hybrid to convert VHS to digital - the right move?

Hello,
I am soon going to be going back to Macintosh after a failed 17 year experiment with Windows and one of the things I will be wanting to do is transfer some home videos I own into a format that I can edit likely using I-movie.
I have reviewed several discussions on-line, and think I will be going with EyeTV Hybrid but I am wanting some fresh advice to make sure I am making the right decision. The videos I will be wanting to transfer come in, what I believe, are two analog forms VHS-C (which I would play back using a VHS cartridge converter as the camera is dead) and Hi8MP which I would play back using a Samsung SCw62 Camcorder.
Essentially, I am looking for a good conversion but it does not have to be great. I would like to be able to do some editing once they are converted, but these are home movies and I am treating them that way and not looking at producing a professional quality video.
So here are the options I have gathered online. As I said, I think I am likely going to go for EyeTV Hybrid but would appreciate any feedback as to whether it’s the best option for me or whether I should be considering something else. Money is an issue and I really don't see myself going much above $200 on this.
From what I have read, EyeTV Hybrid seems like it might be my best option. Its priced at around $150 which fits my budget and I understand the results are fairly good. Any reason why I should be wary of this option? Is it fairly straight forward to use? From what I understand, I all need to buy is this and it comes with the necessary software – am I correct?
I have read that video pass through in which the camera essentially converts analog to a digital signal. This does NOT appear to be an option for me unfortunately. As I mentioned, I own a Samsung SCw62 Camcorder and I also own a Sony HDR-CX110. Reading through the manuals I could see nothing that would suggest they could do this but I would be delighted to be informed that I am wrong.
There appeared to be a consensus on the threads I read that the Grass Valley ADVC300 analog DV converter would produce a high quality transfer. However, the price that I have seen is about $400 and this is far more than I am willing to pay and I haven’t seen a used one on ebay.
The ADVC110 does fit my budget but I am wondering if it would be much better than the EyeTV Hybrid as the prices I have seen have been a little more than $200.
There appears to be a consensus that the Roxio Easy VHS to DVD will result in a fairly low quality video and is not recommended. Anyone disagree?
Are there any other options I should consider?
Finally, as I noted I want to make some nice home movies using my old analog tapes is there any reason why investing in Final Cut Express would help in the conversion process?
Thanks to everyone for your help.
Cheers

There appeared to be a consensus on the threads I read that the Grass Valley ADVC300 analog DV converter would produce a high quality transfer.
I have a drawer full of analog-to-digital converters (including the EyeTV Hybrid). After using the Grass Valley ADVC300 I find nothing else acceptable. I appreciate your concerns about the cost you just have to decide how important these videos are.
Compared to today's standards DV Video's quality is not that great, so I don't want to lose ANYTHING in my conversion, I have no quality to "spare".
I've played around with countless other conversion systems, ranging in price from $79 to $399. Short verison, this is the ONLY unit to own. No dropped frames at all, even with questionable quality tapes, no jitter, great color, excellent sound quality. Zero setup with iMovie 06 and iDVD 09/11.
This is a prosumer deck. The time code function is alone worth the price if you have old analog footage. Absolutely NO "Out Of Sync" audio.
ADVC300 is for anyone who wants to do editing and is concerned about quality of color and speed, for the novice it is an incredible gizmo that will restore VHS tapes to a state close to the original fixing midtones, highlights and shadows on the fly. Not only can you simply convert analog to digital you can actually manipulate the signal going in (if you want to).
A bit pricey but it WORKS.

Which one is the Right Approach - Re Using Page Layouts or adding Web parts directly to pages instead of page layouts in SP 2013 online site ?

Hi Team,
I am SharePoint 2013 developer. Before asking question I would like to explain the requirement in clarity.
We are developing one O365 SharePoint online site which is having 10 different page layouts with different and some common webparts and we are reusing these page layouts by deploying a sandboxed solution which is having page layouts. These page layouts contain
filter and query to display data using some condition and predefined values. By using these layouts we have to create 100+ pages. All pages will show data according to that page name and category (if it belongs any). We have not written any code to develop
the site, everything is OOB feature.
We have used below feature/list/lib of SP Online 2013:
- Document Library
- Survey
- Calendar
- Lists
- Discussion forum library
- OOB Search feature
Now, I would like to know whether this is the right approach to reuse the page layouts. Or can we add webparts directly where the logic resides in the webparts and add them to the pages instead of page layouts?
Also how to deploy page layouts/pages from one server to another? Currently we are deploying everything as a feature using sandbox solution.
Could you please let me know the right approach to follow. I am asking this question because we are facing below issues:
- Sometime page layouts gets corrupted, showing nothing.
- All written filters/logic disappear when we open layouts in Designer
- Deployment is pain using Sandbox solution
Waiting for your reply.
Thanks in Advance,
Shifa Mittal

Interesting question, to which i do not know a definitive answer.
Output Caching is used to increase performance and to reduce load on the box. However since you're in the MS Cloud you don't need to worry about the latter and MS do the worrying about the former. I wouldn't be surprised if MS have updated the behaviour
for O365 and not updated the documentation. That first office.com article is using 2010 screenshots which doesn't fill me with confidence about it's continuing relevance. Don't forget that SharePoint 2013 and O365 are technically different versions and have
very different behaviour in places.
Generally i'd say not to worry, but in this case if you do find any more information i'd love to see it.

Worried about whether I made the right decision

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for