Would a 64GB iPad take longer to sync than 32GB?

I have been using 16GB iPhones for a few years and am getting ready to buy an iPad.
I have a LOT of music and movies and am really leaning towards buying a 64gb model so I will be able to keep more with me
(I have limited access to 3G and to WIFI sites so "streaming" it or using iCloud often wouldn't work for me).
My only concern about getting the 64GB model is... I am wondering if it will take significantly longer to sync a 64GB iPad than a 32GB model.
Anybody have any real-world experience with this sort of thing?
I know there are going to be a lot of variables involved....
I'm just curious how much does the total memory capacity affect sync times?

Wow - thanks for a quick reply!
I understand what you're saying.
Theoretically if I have two units - a 64GB unit and a 32GB unit and I am loading up 25GB of music they should take the same amount of time to sync.
Theoretically.
But the real world doesn't always work out like expected.
So - I'm looking for firsthand comments/experience with this.

Similar Messages

Take long to sync contacts and notes calandario 6800 and with Microsoft Outlook already have 2 hours and not finish the process please help

take long to sync contacts and notes calandario 6800 and with Microsoft Outlook
already have 2 hours and not finish the process please help

Where error messages are you getting?
Can you not do both? Send and Receive?
Check but I think yo have the right setting described here:
iCloud: Mail server information

Does Mac OS X in 64 bits takes longer to boot than in 32 bits?

Hello, Does Mac OS X 10.6.3 in 64 bits mode takes longer to boot than in 32 bits mode?. If I boot Mac OS X in my MacBook Pro 5.1 in 64 bits mode it takes 51.3 sec, and if I boot it in 32 bits mode it takes 33.1 sec. I just want to know if this is normal or not. And in case this is normal I would appreciate it a lot if someone could explain me why it takes longer to boot in 64 bits mode than in 32 bits mode.
Thank you a lot for any help that you could give me

Just the opposite for me. My early 2008 Mac Pro definitely boots (and runs) faster in 64 bit mode. As Barry mentioned though, you may not want to do this.
The main rule is kernel extensions. If you have anything that needs to load on boot that is only 32 bit (mouse, keyboard, scanner or other type of driver/software), then you must boot in 32 bit mode or they won't load.
As long as all of your boot software is 64 bit compatible, then booting 64 bit is fine. 32 bit software you launch after the OS is up and running will still run as 32 bit with the OS in 64 bit mode.

4" x 6" videos take longer to open than a 3" x 5" vid? Load time affected?

I think I know the answer to my question but I want to make sure before I go and change the sizes of all my little mini videos:
Does the speed at which a video opens depend (among other things) on the DIMENSIONS OF THE VIEWING BOX? So that a 3“ x 5” picture takes longer to open than, say, a 4“ X 6” picture?
Is the difference a noticeable one? If a larger picture means waiting only two more seconds for the video to open and show, then that seems an Ok payoff to me. But if the wait becomes considerably longer, than it probably is not Ok to the visitor.
Thank you.
~ Lorna in Southern California
http://web.mac.com/lorna6

Winston C... I mean at the point where a visitor to my website has already opened the Big Album Index page and clicks onto one of my mini videos, like the Dominatrix Rise Up vid. If I were to make smaller the box in which you see the Dominatrix speaking, would that page open up faster? If yes, then is it substantially faster? Or am I ok just leaving the dimensions of the box alone?
~ Lorna in Southern California
mywebsite

IPads no longer appear/sync in iTunes 11.0.4

Since iTunes 11.0.4 update (OS X 10.8.4), all the iPads no longer appear as devices in iTunes and thus won't synchronise.
iPod classic & nano still show up when connected and sync. fine.
The iPads no longer show up either via WiFi or USB connection: 2 x iPad 2, iPad 3, iPad mini.
Their backups have also vanished from Prefs -> Devices.
Don't see any logs appear when they connect via USB.
Tried connecting an iPad to a MacBook Pro running iTunes 11.0.3 and it showed up fine.

Fixed!
Downgrading to 11.0.3 didn't help, but it meant I could re-upgrade it again.
Downloaded the installer from Apple rather than via App Store and bang - all the iPads are now seen again.
All the iPad backups are now shown again too, including the gen. 2 iPod touch that I've not synced for ages (because all the apps I used to use on it no longer support its version of iOS).
Strange. Will download the full installer from now on.

IPad takes hours to sync photos

Hi all
When I first got my iPad in October, it synced all photos fine. I had loads of folders on there and could add new ones whenever I wanted to, quickly.
All of a sudden when I sync my iPad it optimizes every single photo and takes hours and hours to sync.
This is utterly ridiculous considering there are over 2000 photos, it does it for every one each time! How can I leave my iPad syncing for hours every single time I want to add new photos, why cant it just be like adding new music it takes a few seconds to add the new items!
I have searched and searched on internet forums for an answer and they all just say NO cant turn it off. So basically I cannot have photos on my iPad as the function is NOT efficient and fast like it used to be. I havent changed anything at all, all I want is my photos of my baby girl on my iPad.
Please someone help, there must be a way around this.
Thanks

This happened to me, and I found that the process was slow because I was using a separate hard drive (connected to my wireless modem) to store the photos on.
When I connected my pc directly to my wireless modem using a cable, then disabling wireless, I found the sync speed was much faster.

Mac OS 10.4 Mail takes longer to receive than on Outlook Express 5

I receive email via Outlook Express 5.0.6 within an hour (but hate to use it). It can take Mac OS 10.4.8 Mail up to 24 hrs longer. Mail Preferences are set to: Check for new mail:” Every 30 min.” Under Accounts>Advanced: “Enable This Account” and “Include when automatically when checking for new mail” are both checked. The ISP is Comcast. What is the problem?

We have the same problem. The user rights under Leopard are not interpreted correctly while the Tiger clients show the correct entries. I´ve posted another topic to that thing...

ICloud account takes longer to send than other accounts.

I have several accounts configured on my iPhone 4. I've got Yahoo, Gmail and Outlook.com. I just created an iCloud mail account yesterday. So far it takes a fee minutes before my email from my iCloud account gets sent while I have no problems of delay whatsoever in sending with any other of my accounts. How come?

I was having the same problem; but I've found a workaround that might help. Here's what to do:
Set up your iCloud account on your iPhone/iPad with whichever email address you want as your main one; either .me or .mac.
Set up a Gmail account if you don't already have one. It doesn't matter if you don't ever intend you use it for sending email.
Go to your 'Mail, Contacts, Calendars' settings on your iPhone/iPad, and add the Gmail account if you don't already have one set up.
Go into your Gmail settings and under 'Account' list all the email addresses you want want to send from as your secondary option. In my case, I had already set up iCloud with .mac so I've listed the .me one in my Gmail settings. Put a comma and space between each email address. I've got three email addresses listed here. (See screen grab). Oddly, I didn't seem to have the comma key available on my iPad, so I listed my email addresses in 'Notes' and cut/pasted them in.
Now when you send an email, you should have all those addresses available to send from.
Hope this helps.
Tom.

DELETE query takes long time more than 30 min

Hi
I have delete query as below.It takes 1300 sec to execute .Please let me know how to reduce the time of execution.I have indexes on both the columns jdoid,jdoversion of deletion.
DELETE FROM SIT7016.DEVICEINTERFACE WHERE JDOID = :1 AND JDOVERSION = :2
Regards
Pandu

udnapp wrote:
I have delete query as below.It takes 1300 sec to execute .Please let me know how to reduce the time of execution.I have indexes on both the columns jdoid,jdoversion of deletion.
DELETE FROM SIT7016.DEVICEINTERFACE WHERE JDOID = :1 AND JDOVERSION = :2Pretty meaningless information without an the execution plan.

Urgent run the job --SBIE0001 takes long time more than two hours

hi expert,
we run the job which cocntian the program SBIE0001 it takes so along time,
we use the job to eatra the date from our system to another satellite system, by checking the
job this is one step takes the mainly time as below.
88 LUWs confirmed and 88 LUWs to be deleted with function module RSC2_QOUT_CONFIRM_DATA
any update will be appreciated. thanks in advance.

If you have transaction ME30 active in yous system, run the program into in.
It will give more information about how the time is lost.

SAINT/SPAM UPDATE takes longer time more than 12hours

Hi everyone,
I am doing SAINT/SPAM UPDATE version 33 on NW70 systems running on windows 2003 x64 servers with oracle 10g database. The update is running for more than 12 hours and has not finished yet.
Normally SAINT/SPAM update wud take 15 to 20mins. But this is very unusual.
Has anyone faced similar problems before ?
Please suggest solutions if any
thanks
Moses

Check the import monitor and the tp system log to check the status of the patch... please post here any errors found.
Loging using DDIC
ensure 000 client you login
ensure your active login session on CI instance (in case multiple instances)
ensure to shutdown/stop all other instances (Dialog Distances) running on other hosts
This information is inacurate and missleading... You don't need to logon with DDIC you can use any user with the right authorizations, also you don't need to shutdown any instances.
Regards
Juan

Why does wifi takes longer with Lion than Snow Leopard?

My Macbook pro doesn't find my Airport nearly as quick with Lion as it did with Snow Leopard. Many times it will even jump over to another persons unlocked network even though my Airport is at the top of the preferred list of networks. It also shows a box saying that I am not connected even after I am connected, so then I have to click the box just to remove it. This is annoying as ****. Why is this happening? There weren't any similar problems when upgrading fron Leopard to Snow Leopard.

My Macbook pro doesn't find my Airport nearly as quick with Lion as it did with Snow Leopard. Many times it will even jump over to another persons unlocked network even though my Airport is at the top of the preferred list of networks. It also shows a box saying that I am not connected even after I am connected, so then I have to click the box just to remove it. This is annoying as ****. Why is this happening? There weren't any similar problems when upgrading fron Leopard to Snow Leopard.

Crashed 160GB Classic Will No Longer Hold More than 32GB of Data

So, a few months ago, my 160GB iPod Classic (which is 3 years old last Christmas), crashed on me. I was in the process of uploading some songs to it when it froze; I attempted to eject it, got no response and simply unplugged it. Upon plugging the iPod back in, I was informed that it was corrupted and had to be restored, which I did. Now I find that the iPod simply won't hold hold more than approximately 30-32GB of media before a similar process occurs: the iPod freezes during syncing and then becomes corrupted upon ejection, wherein I restore the iPod and repeat. My initial thought is that a significant portion of the hard drive has crashed and will no longer hold data, but I figured it's probably worth asking whether there's anything I can do to fix this. My AppleCare has expired, and I'm wondering if there's any way around buying an entirely new iPod to remedy the issue. Any help would be appreciated.

Hi d.a,
I work for Dr Pod, an iPod repair company.
It sounds like your hard drive is dying. This is common for an iPod of this age. First of all, I'd try restoring and see if this makes any changes. You can do this by plugging the iPod into iTunes and then clicking 'Restore'.
If this does not work, then it sounds like your iPod has a hardware fault. As your iPod is 3 years old, it is out of warranty, and Apple would charge you for any repairs. A new hard drive for this iPod usually costs around £100.
If you feel that this price is too high, then you could look to buy a new iPod from Apple. They will take your old iPod and give you a 10% discount of the cost of your iPod.
I hope that I have helped. Please get back to me if you need any more assistance,
Mark Sweeney
Dr Pod Founder

Why it takes long time to execute on Production than staging?

Hi Experts,
Any help apreciated on below issue.
I have one anonymous block for updating around 1 million records by joining 9 tables.
This is proceeded to production by following environments. And all env have exact equal volume of data.
development->Testing->Staging->Production.
The funny problem is while it takes 5 mins to be executed in all environments, it takes 30 mins on production.
why it happned and what can be action points for future?
Thanks
-J
==============
If the performance is that different in the different environments, one or more statements must have different query plans in the different environments. The first step would be to get the query plans and compare them to figure out which statement(s) is/are running slowly.
If there are different query plans, that implies that something is different between the environments. That could be any of
- Oracle version
- initialization parameters
- data
- object statistics
- system statistics
If you guarantee that the data is the same, I would tend to expect that the object statistics are different. How have you gathered statistics in the various environments? Can you move statistics from an environment where performance is acceptable to the environment where performance is unacceptable?
I would also recommend following the advice others have given you. You don't want to commit in a loop and you want to do as much processing in SQL as possible.
Justin
===============
Thanks Steve for your inputs.
My investigation resulted following 2 points.
There are 2 main reasons why some scripts might take longer in live than on Staging.
1: Weekend backups were running on the live server so slowing the server down allot.
2: the tables are re-orged when they are imported into staging/Dev – so the table and index layout is optimal, on live the tables and indexes are not necessarily contiguous so in order to do the same work the server will need to do many more I/O operations.
Can we have some action points to address these above issues?
I think if data can be contigous then it may help.
Best Regards
-J
===============
But before that, can you raise this in a seperate thread as there is a different issue going on in this thread?
Cheers
Sarma.
===========
Posts: 4
Registered: 08/28/06
Re: Performance issue (Oracle 10.2.0.3.0)
Posted: May 22, 2009 2:46 AM in response to: Radhakrishna Sa... Edit Reply
Hey Sarma,
Exterme aplogies to say that I don't know how to raise a new thread.
Thanks in advnce for your help.
-J
user636482
Posts: 202
Registered: 05/15/08
Re: Performance issue (Oracle 10.2.0.3.0)
Posted: May 22, 2009 2:51 AM in response to: user527345 Reply
Hi User 527345,
Please follow the steps to raise a request in this Forum.
1. Register urself.
2. Go to the forum home and select the Technolgy where do you want to rasie a request.
eg : If is related to Oracle DATAbase general then select Oracle databse general...
3. clik on post new thread
4. Give the summary of your issue.
5. then submit the issue.
please let me know if you need more information.
Thank you

Jayashree Mohanty wrote:
My investigation resulted following 2 points.
There are 2 main reasons why some scripts might take longer in live than on Staging.
1: Weekend backups were running on the live server so slowing the server down allot.
2: the tables are re-orged when they are imported into staging/Dev – so the table and index layout is optimal, on live the tables and indexes are not necessarily contiguous so in order to do the same work the server will need to do many more I/O operations.
Can we have some action points to address these above issues?
I think if data can be contigous then it may help.First , I didn't get at all what actually was that thing when you copied some part of don't know which post in your actual question? Please read this , it would help you post a proper question to get a proper answer ,
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Now, how did you come to the conclusion that the backups are actually making your query slower? What's the benchmark that you lead to this? And what's the meaning of the 2nd point , can you please explain it ?
As others have also mentioned, please post the plan of the query at boththe staging and production, that only can tell that what's going on.
HTH
Aman....

Gif files takes long time to load..!!

Hi,
I found the gif/jpg files takes long time ( more than 5 or 6 seconds depends on size ) to render on JavaHelp viewer EditorPane.. I am using JDK 1.3 / Win 2000 / 256 MB / 1 GHz Pentium. Also found JVM uses 90% of the system resources while loading the pic files. I have noticed it as a JDK 1.3 bug from another thread.
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jsp?forum=42&thread=230409
I would like to know is there any other solution for this, keeping my JDK Version as it is?
Thanks
Reji

I would convert your images to JPegs if possible since they are so much smaller in size and therefore load much quicker. I had exactly the same problem but I sorted it out this way. I know it's a pain and it will probably screw up your view, but it will speed up your load time ten-fold and I don't know of any other work around. sorry...

Would a 64GB iPad take longer to sync than 32GB?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for