WQHD IPS Monitor support

I currently am operating on a 2010 Mac Pro with a ATI Radeon HD 5770 video card (two minidisplay port, and a single dual-link DVI) . The machine has been upgraded to 10.8.X, and has 16GB or RAM. My 30" Apple display is on its last legs. I cannot confirm whether the following display could be fully utilized with the installed video card-
http://www.lg.com/us/monitors/lg-34UM95-P-ultrawide-monitor

Your proposed monitor is:
3440x1440
These
better replacement for ATI Radeon HD 5770
http://www.amd.com/en-us/products/graphics/desktop/5000/5770
would say no since only supports max
Integrated dual-link DVI output with HDCP8Max resolution: 2560x16009
Integrated DisplayPort outputMax resolution: 2560x16009
HDMI® (With 3D, Deep Color and x.v.Color™)Max resolution: 1920x12009
Integrated VGA outputMax resolution: 2048x15369

Similar Messages

No Scaling Option for Dell WQHD IPS Monitor

I have a Dell UltraSharp U2713HM which have a Native Resolution2560 x 1440 at 60 Hz .
I used MDP to DP cable ant my new macbook pro retina is driving it @Native Resolution2560 x 1440 at 60 Hz just fine.
My RMBP's "Colour LCD" is scaling perfectly. but my U2713HM have no scaling options like RMBP screen.
I can Downgrade resolution to 1080p or something other than that there is no option.
I see some videos on youtube that OS X support 4k display with same scaling options on my RMBP display.
On my U2713HM native resolution looks good but difficult to browse Facebook etc.
it is too small. if i downscale resolution it is not as good as 2560 x 1440.
How to solve this problem?
This is my first mac

Hi Rich,
Normally I wouldn't recommend cross-posting, but if this isn't a MBP hardware issue, there is also a Windows Compatibility forum you may want to post in. Good luck.
http://discussions.apple.com/forum.jspa?forumID=687

[SOLVED] IPS Monitor Resolution Not Detected

I just got one of the new Catleap 27" IPS monitors. It works fine in Windows at its native 2560x1440 but arch doesn't seem to be detecting it properly
Screen 0: minimum 8 x 8, current 2720 x 1080, maximum 16384 x 16384
DVI-I-0 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
DVI-I-1 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
DVI-I-2 connected 800x600+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 0mm x 0mm
800x600 60.3*+
HDMI-0 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
DP-0 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
DVI-I-3 connected 1920x1080+800+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 531mm x 298mm
1920x1080 60.0*+ 60.0
1440x900 59.9
1280x1024 60.0
1280x800 59.8
1152x864 75.0
1024x768 70.1 60.0
800x600 60.3 56.2
640x480 59.9
DP-1 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
DVI-I-3 is my second monitor (a regular LCD) which works fine. I think DVI-I-2 is the Catleap. Oddly, the manual says it supports 800x600 but it won't even turn on when X is started. Also it works fine when X isn't started. Whenever I switch to a different TTY my second monitor turns off and the Catleap turns on (albeit at a low resolution).
I've tried adding a new resolution mode with xrandr, but that gives me an error
# xrandr --newmode "2560x1440_60.00" 312.25 2560 2752 3024 3488 1440 1443 1448 1493 -hsync +vsync
# xrandr --addmode DVI-I-2 2560x1440_60.00
X Error of failed request: BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes)
Major opcode of failed request: 153 (RANDR)
Minor opcode of failed request: 18 (RRAddOutputMode)
Serial number of failed request: 37
Current serial number in output stream: 38
I've tried various xorg.conf settings and using nvidia-settings, but nothing I do can get it to use a higher resolution or even turn on for that matter. I'm not sure if my dual monitor setup could be screwing with it. I've tried disconnecting my second monitor but that doesn't seem to help.
I found this article, which says that the Catleap's EDID isn't in Linux by default so you can specify it manually. So I set up my xorg.conf.d directory as follows
# 90-serverlayout.conf
Section "ServerLayout"
Identifier "Main"
Screen 0 "Acer V243"
Screen 1 "Catleap Q270" LeftOf "Acer V243"
Option "Xinerama" "1"
EndSection
# 30-screen-acerv243.conf
Section "Monitor"
Identifier "Acer V243H"
HorizSync 31.0 - 83.0
VertRefresh 56.0 - 76.0
Option "DPMS"
EndSection
Section "Screen"
Identifier "Acer V243"
Device "GTX 570 DVI 2"
Monitor "Acer V243H"
DefaultDepth 24
SubSection "Display"
Depth 24
EndSubSection
EndSection
# 30-screen-qhd270.conf
Section "Monitor"
Identifier "QHD270"
VendorName "ACB"
ModelName "QHD270"
VertRefresh 60
Mode "2560x1440"
DotClock 241.500000
HTimings 2560 2608 2640 2720
VTimings 1440 1443 1448 1481
Flags "-HSync" "+VSync"
EndMode
EndSection
Section "Screen"
Identifier "Catleap Q270"
Device "GTX 570 DVI 1"
Monitor "QHD270"
DefaultDepth 24
Option "UseEdid" "FALSE"
SubSection "Display"
Depth 24
Modes "2560x1440"
ViewPort 0 0
Virtual 2560 1440
EndSubSection
EndSection
# 20-nvidia.conf
Section "Device"
Identifier "GTX 570 DVI 1"
Driver "nvidia"
VendorName "NVIDIA Corporation"
BoardName "GeForce GTX 570"
Screen 1
Option "UseDisplayDevice" "DFP-0"
Option "DynamicTwinView" "FALSE"
EndSection
Section "Device"
Identifier "GTX 570 DVI 2"
Driver "nvidia"
VendorName "NVIDIA Corporation"
BoardName "GeForce GTX 570"
Screen 0
Option "UseDisplayDevice" "DFP-3"
Option "DynamicTwinView" "FALSE"
EndSection
Which doesn't work. The Catleap still won't turn on and the mouse position is all screwed up on my Acer. If I comment out the screen 1 line in the ServerLayout, the Acer works fine on its own.
Last edited by silverhammermba (2012-11-14 02:00:51)

Switching to the open source driver fixed my problem.

25bw IPS monitor

Never again will I buy a HP monitor. 2 1/2 months after the warranty expires, a red line appears on the right side of the screen going straight down. Called up the tech support and they try to sell me the same one for "a reasonable price". Why would I buy the same monitor that malfunctions a couple months after the warranty is gone. No thank you. I've had my IPS monitor for over 2 years, not a dang thing wrong with it. Of course I upgraded to an ASUS IPS 27"...which I'm now forced to use because I refuse to use a defected monitor...but yeah. Way to go HP. You just lost yourself a customer.

I just sent you a private message. If you are not sure how to check your forum messages, this post has instructions.
Please click the "Thumbs Up" on the bottom right of this post to say thank you if you appreciate the support I provide!
Also be sure to mark my post as “Accept as Solution" if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others who face the same challenge find the same solution.
Dunidar
I work on behalf of HP
Find out a bit more about me by checking out my profile!
"Customers don’t expect you to be perfect. They do expect you to fix things when they go wrong." ~ Donald Porter

Lenovo 3000 N200 0769-ALU Dual Monitor Support

My nephew has a Lenovo 3000 N200 0769-ALU, downgraded from Vista to XP. Does this notebook support Dual Monitor Extended Desktop configuration? If so, how is this configured?
My nephew lives in a different city, so I am not able to just go over and lay w/ his machine. I am familiar w/ the dual monitor support on my HP LapTop, but am not sure what to look for on the Lenovo. Assistance is appreciated.
~ K

Computer is working now. The hibernation is still a problem.
I got a question though, i have SATA mode disabled now, but i'd like it to be enabled. How do i install this driver:
http://www-307.ibm.com/pc/support/site.wss/MIGR-67897.html

Feature Request - Better Multiple Monitor Support

Lightroom's support for a second display has definitely helped my workflow. I hope the team will consider adding more flexible multiple monitor support in version 4. Here's why.
I've recently experimented with running one of my three screens in portrait mode. When this screen hosts Lightroom's secondary display window in Loupe view, my verticals finally get equal real estate for editing. While I've not done hard statistics on my library, I know more than 50% of my imagery is in portrait orientation.
I'd like to see LR V4 support three or more screens so I could set up as follow:
Screen 1 - main lightroom interface, would not need to be calibrated, for controls and navigation
Screen 2 - Portrait orientation, loupe view - this would be a calibrated display, all develop changes to verticals would be judged on this screen
Screen 3 - Landscape orientation, loupe view - another calibrated display, all develop changes to horizontals would be judged on this screen
If Adobe could make the app intelligent enough to route the image to the correct screen based on orientation (recognizing and respecting cropping that could change orientation) my edit sessions would certainly speed up and I could maximize the productivity of multiple screens.
I'd be happy with this, but I'm also stymied by the need to switch back to Library mode to tag images when my primary workflow has me in develop. Ultimately everything depends on the quality of the image. Before I invest in image-specific meta data, I have to process or at least "test-process" an image. IMO the Quick Develop panel is useless, once you become accustomed to the granular control of the develop sliders, it just doesn't cut it.
In the three monitor setup I described above I'd love to be able to configure screen 1, with a combination of panels from Library and Develop, so I could stay "develop centric" with immediate access to keywording and meta. The two additional screens would intelligently handle image display.
I think this might speed my workflow by 33% and having just returned from a Tour de France project that generated 23,000 images I need all the productivity help I can get.

VeloDramatic wrote:
Thanks for all those votes Rob. Now we just need to get the other 999,999 on board.
Actually, this topic has come up a lot on this forum. At this point, I think we just need to get Adobe on board.
VeloDramatic wrote:
There may be another thread for this one additional thought. If Adobe does improve multiple monitor support, we should be able to optimize our previews for those screens. Even after prerendering 1:1 previews there are issues with DEVELOP doing its own thing (I believe) each time a new image is loaded. I make extensive use of the PREVIOUS button moving through my shoots and there's always a lag of one or two seconds while the develop preview loads before the button is active. In a desktop environment where multiple screens allow landscape and portrait images to be displayed full screen I'd argue that 100% of the host screen resolution would be the ideal preview. Hope that made sense.
Yes, faster switching would be nice. I'm not sure what that would take. As it stands, there's like "9" previews generated when you do 1:1s - 100% down to tiny thumbnails. Still, one at exact monitor size that does not need to be resized at all does seem like it would be the fastest - I'm a bit on a limb though at this point.
Rob

Dual Monitor Support No Longer Works

Hi,
I am using Lightroom 2.0 on a MacBook Pro with OS X 10.5.4
Dual monitor support use to work with my Samsung external monitor. But now whenever I try to turn on dual monitor function, lightroom crashes. I know the external monitor and connection is working properly because I am able to use all of my other programs with both monitors, but no longer lightroom's dual monitor function.
Any insight would be much appreciated.
Thanks

It was an extremely frustrating process trying to know if indeed this was the way to calibrate this monitor, and after spending so much time and research was all I could come up with. Did you notice the graphing results of both types of calibration? The red (I believe it was) of the RBG graph line was not lined up at all with the G and B thus the weird color on the monitor, and with the Easy mode, they were at least in line, more or less.

Dual Monitor Support NEEDED

[ Mac OS 10.4.8 - G$ QuickSilver Dual 2.0 - two large monitors ]
I just tried Lightroom for the first time today, and was shocked to see that there is no support for detaching panels onto a second monitor. This is a deal-breaker for me -- lots of glitzy clutter and not enough image space. (Yeah, you can hide panels, but working with two monitors with one monitor reserved for panels is SO much nicer.) I am very concerned that this, along with the Bridge CS3 beta's lack of multiple monitor support is indicative of a very unfortunate trend with Adobe's interface design staff.
And I hope they get the message loud and clear that a deprecation of multiple monitor support is UNACCEPTABLE.
Also, the tabbed design of Adobe Camera Raw 4 as implemented in Photoshop CS3 is much nicer than the space-consuming approach in Lightroom.

Well said, Dan. I think the thing that also troubles me is what you mention about being inbuilt from the ground up. The fact that it was considered "too difficult" to get in to v1.0 indicates that the framework of the application and the architecture therein isn't built in such a way as to make a second view of a particular image or set of images possible on a secondary monitor without significant development work. This will inevitably lead to a 'bolted on' look and feel as the holdouts within the lightroom team capitulate and shove in such support.
If even partial support for simply showing one image - or heck, a slideshow - on a designated monitor (remember some people have more than 2, especially when presenting slideshows) were included in version 1, it would indicate to me that the architecture team "wanted to do it right" and had to put off some features until later. Having to completely bolt it on after the launch just means they couldn't even get it in the basic architecture.
And, yes, Richard.... that one "feature" is certainly a deal breaker for me. "Usable" is in the mind of the "user" but usefulness is obvious. Let's consider a use-case scenario:
I have a 23" cinema display, which I like to use for showing a Really Big Image, and i have a 21" Wacom cintiq on which I like to use the pen and tap on images to select or browse them and adjust sliders and whatnot. Don't tell me that the fact I can't do that with Lightroom isn't perfectly valid instant deal breaker! With Lightroom, I can either use my cinema display and get a kind-of large image and adjust with a mouse, or I can use my cintiq and get a pretty-darn-small image and use my pen. With Aperture, I can set the "main window" as my cintiq (although I do have to do this in the OS - a minor pain) but I can see the image I'm working with (or a set of several selected images) very large on my 23". Is that not an obviously better workflow? So much to possibly be a deal breaker _without_ really even getting in to some of the less-immediately-apparent features of Lightroom? For me, yes.
Does anyone think I'm _really_ comparing apples to oranges when I look at Aperture and Lightroom side-by-side? I'm sure if I worked for Apple or Adobe, I'd try to make that claim, but as a user, what I think I am looking at are applications that let me organize, tag, view, and adjust a database of images. Which ever application is the most useful for doing those tasks wins. I hold out hope that Lightroom may one day be the winner in this arms race of image management and correction applications, but right now there is absolutely no way I can credit Lightroom with even being competitive with Aperture when one of my two monitors has to sit dark when I use Lightroom.

External LG IPS Monitor 23 inch 23EA53 and Macbook Pro Retina 13 erros to display

Good night,
I bought a LG IPS Monitor 23 inch 23EA53 and connect it with an HDMI monitor spanning works, but with a slight drizzle white and red on the screen, also tested it with an adapter Mini Display Port to DVI, but this unfortunately also this with errors ... after a while it clears hers Monitor LG, what is happening with my Macbook Pro?

Hi mwc6zp,
I have come across exactly the same issue. Same monitor, same laptop model and year, same everything. The only way I can get it to work is by using the standard HDMI input to the laptop.
Were you ever able to work around this?

FX5900-TD128 - Dual monitor support?

?(
I'm thinking of buy a FX5900-TD128 card, but I want dual monitor support (2 CRTs). I looked on the product info page, but it doesn't explicitly say the card can actually do this... I don't want to find out the hard way by dropping $400+ on a card and then finding out it can't do something I need ;(
BTW: I assume this thing will fit fine in a 865PE Neo2-LS mobo... right?
Thanks

Quote
Originally posted by Assaf
Looks like it should fit, but I didn\'t actually try to install it in a 865PE Neo2 yet.
It would be a logical assumption that MSI's designers would get their gfx cards to fit their own mobos :D
I haven't seen anyone complain so it should be ok.
Thanks.

NB520 - Multiple monitor support

Do NB520 have multiple monitor support built in, if not, how can I have multiple monitor support for my NB520? I need for using a Pewerpoint 2007 (to display presenter view differs from audience view).
Many thanks for an answer in advance.

Hi smit_Aood,
The NB520 supports one external monitor and you can use internal + external monitor at the same time (two monitors are supported). Furthermore you can choose if you want to extend the desktop on second monitor or clone it.
Using FN+F5 key combination you can switch between different modes.
Last but not least you can also use a Beamer or TV as second monitor. A certain computer monitor is not required. ;)

UltraSharp 2407FPW 24.0-inch Wide Flat Panel LCD Monitor Supports HDCP,

The Dell UltraSharp 2407FPW 24.0-inch Wide Flat Panel LCD Monitor Supports HDCP. I am going to order a Mac Pro and it has an Ati Radeon X1900 XT which is HDCP ready. But I really want an Apple Cinema 30 inch Display. Does anyone know how long it is going to take Apple to release the new displays with HDCP? And does anyone recommend the Dell Monitor> Is it better than the Apple Cinema Displays? Thank You.

looking at both up close I think the 3007WFP looks nicer than the apple 30 inch, it also supports HDCP.

Benefits of MSI 3K IPS monitor

No matter what purpose from designer, content creator or gamer, the MSI 3K IPS monitor is truly one of the best option for them.
The specification of the 3K IPS monitor features 2880x1620 in resolution, 1000:1 contrast ratio and maximum horizontal viewing angle of 178 degree.
Indeed it offering the best precision and most satisfied color for specialist like animation engineer or video editor.
Not to mention the gamer who always looking for stunning visual effect.

nice contrast ratio, view angle and pixel per inch
definitely one of the best

Multiple Monitor support using RDP in Windows 10

Does anyone know if you can use multiple monitors when connecting through RDP in Windows 10? In Windows 7, you need to be using Windows 7 Ultimate in order for RDP to support more than one monitor.
For example, my home setup has (2) 22" monitors and I want to RDP to my work PC which also has (2) 22" monitors. We are running windows 7 Pro, so only one monitor would display on my home PC and I couldn't view my 2nd work monitor.
Thanks!

Michalsm2000,
I can't test that due to the shortage of resources.
For the RDP multiple Monitor support, it should be supposed to work on Windows 10.
Regarding what is new in RDP, you may check:
What's New in Remote Desktop Services in the Windows Server Technical Preview
Regards
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

G41TM-E43 Dual Monitor Support

Hi,
Please can you tell me whether this motherboard supports dual monitors? I am trying to build a low energy HTPC, and need to connect the TV up to the HDMI port and a monitor up to the VGA.
Cheers, Mase

That is not likely since it would require a complete re-write of the Remote
Control software.
However, Dual Monitor Support DOES exist in ZCM10.
Craig Wilson - MCNE, MCSE, CCNA
Novell Support Forums Volunteer Sysop
Novell does not officially monitor these forums.
Suggestions/Opinions/Statements made by me are solely my own.
These thoughts may not be shared by either Novell or any rational human.
"Robert Miltenberger" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:_v2Yi.1897$[email protected]..
> Is there going to be dual monitor support in zenworks 7?

WQHD IPS Monitor support

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for