Write Off Inventory

Hi
I need To write Off the Inventory Of a entire Plant, which I can do by Movt Type 551.
Do I Need To do any other actions after scrapping the Inventory. Is there any follow up required after scrapping within SAP MM.
Regards
Shilpi

Hello,
If the materials are excisable, after scrapping, goto T.Code J1IH and select the option ' material write off'.
Enter the material document number along with other details and post the excise JV for the excise value of the scrapped materials.
Regards

Similar Messages

  • Write-off the MM inventory stock

    Dear expert,
    I want write-off the MM inventory stock which is expired, please give the step & procedure.
    Regards,
    PK

    Dear Learn New,
    PI Process -
    Creation of Physical Inv Doc by MI01
    Entering ZERO COUNT (Tick of ZC Box in PI Document by T CD - MI04
    and posting the document by MI07 (individual document) or MI20( List of documents)
    System will adjust inventory automatically by 702 movement type as a issue and financial impact will be in Loss Account as loss due to Physical imbalance in stock.
    You can alternatively withdraw stock for Scrapping by movement type 551.
    Thanks
    Raghavan

  • Physical Inventory IM write off report with values

    Hi All
    I am having difficulty in finding a standard transaction that will detail IM write off with a value/cost.
    I can see tha values in the LI20 trx which is at WM. However, when you write it off at IM (LI21) it only shows material and quantity and not value. I cannot bring the field in using the layout.
    The only way i can currently get the info is to export the data from MB51 (711 and 712 movements) and merge the table in excel with a material cost table and calculate the vaule written off that way.
    I need to know the cost to be written off at IM level before I click on the Write Off button.
    Any ideas?
    Darren

    Not really clear what you want or why you are complaining.
    LI20 is clearing WM differences. Which is a madatory step in the physical inventory cycle. This one will show you the value. and this one is before you post the differences to IM.
    LI21 will not show costs. If you wait with LI21 then you  might get other costs than shown in LI20, however, more critical is the stock inconsistency that you have between WM and IM  until you execute LI21.
    MB51 has the value within, no need to export to Excel and valuated it with a price from another download.

  • Project Billing "write-off" options

    I'm attempting to determine the best method of "writing off" transactions on direct projects that have been reported as billable, accrued revenue but will never be billed. Please consider the following narrative as an example:
    A consultant (consultant x) charges April time and expense to project 10001 in a billable capacity (charged transactions to a billable task). The transactions are cost distributed, revenue distributed and an invoice is subsequently produced. All cost and revenue transactions are produced, interfaced and ultimately posted to the general ledger in April. The month of April is closed in PA and the invoices for the April billing cycle are produced. Project 10001's draft invoice includes those charges reported by consultant x and is distributed to the project manager for approval. The project manager reviews the invoice review and determines that consultant x's transactions will never be billed and instructs the accounting group to write off the transactions.
    Challenge: we need a way to "write-off" (reduce revenue and change billing status) transactions that will allow for consistent reporting and measurement. Specifically, we need to be able to determine all write-off's (revenue/billing reductions) in a given period that relate to original transactions from an earlier or different period. In short, we want to establish a policy and procedure for consistently processing and reporting these types of conditions.
    Proposed Options:
    1) use the "special" non-billable adjustment option from either expenditure inquiry or invoice review to change the billing status from billable to non-billable.
    Pros:
    a) transactions will remain on the project in the capacity they were reported by the employee
    b) an adjustment record will be created in the PA_Expend_Item_adj_Activities table which will include the adjustment activity code (i.e. Billable Reclass, Non-billable reclass, billing hold, billing hold release, etc.)
    c) history of who created original transactions and adjustments is available (full audit trail)
    d) a reversing revenue entry will be created in the PA_Cust_Rev_Dist_Lines_all table which will allow us to track the dates (gl period) of the revenue adjustment and compare it to the original transaction dates.
    Cons:
    a) to the average users the transaction on a billable task flagged as non-billable with no corresponding revenue may look unusual because there is no description explaining why the adjustment existed. the only way to determine that revenue existed and was subsequently reversed is to look at item details- revenue details.
    b)The revenue write-off will be charged to the same accounts (revenue and inventory) that the original transaction was booked to but in reverse. we don't have the ability to deflect the "write-off" to a bad debt account versus a direct write-off of revenue.
    c) The employee's utilization calculations will be impacted by changing the billing status of the transactions and reducing the corresponding revenue. we may need to update the utilization report to reflect these types of transactions differently.
    2) use the "special" transfer adjustment option to transfer the transaction from the originating billable task to a non-billable destination task on the project in question.
    Pros:
    a) the average user will easily see that the transaction in question has been reversed and b) the revenue subsequently written off by the negative revenue on the reversal transaction
    c) an adjustment record will be created in the PA_Expend_Item_adj_activities table which will include the applicable adjustment activity code(s) (Transfer Back-out, Transfer Originating, Transfer Destination).
    d) history of who created original and adjustments is available.
    a reversing revenue entry will be made via e) the negative reversal entry created in the PA_Cust_Rev_Dist_Lines_All table.
    Cons:
    a) the original transaction is being altered (transferred) by accounting. the integrity of the transaction as it was submitted by the source employee may be compromised.
    b) there is no easy way for the average end user to know where the transaction was transferred to. the information is available via ad hoc reporting from database tables but looking at expenditure inquiry for a given project you will not be able to determine where the transaction went if it was transferred to another task and many tasks exist or if it was transferred to another project entirely.
    c) The revenue write-off will be charged to the same accounts (revenue and inventory) that the original transaction was booked to but in reverse. we don't have the ability to deflect the "write-off" to a bad debt account versus a direct write-off of revenue.
    d) The employee's utilization calculations will be impacted by changing the billing status of the transactions and reducing the corresponding revenue. we may need to update the utilization report to reflect these types of transactions differently.
    e) As a common practice, each project will need at least one "non-billable" task to capture such write-off transfers.
    3) use a write-off event (both revenue and billing) to reduce the project by the aggregate amount of all transactions in question.
    Pros:
    a) employee specific transactions and ultimately utilization results will not be impacted by the independent event transaction.
    b) by modifying our autoaccounting rules we will be able to book the "write-off" to an account other than a revenue account. (I believe, more research necessary)
    Cons:
    a) No link back to actual transactions.
    b) original transactions will remain untouched and will appear as though they were billed and will show up on the invoice and detail reports to the client along with an aggregated event for the total write-off amount.
    Any thoughts or opinions you can provide about the best practice in Oracle will be greatly appreciated.
    null

    Diana,
    Here's another response from a (very) senior Projects consultant. Her comments are in CAPS, so they can be dinstinguished from your comments:
    "I recommend following the approach she outlines in Section 2, with the following additions:
    SECTION 2) use the "special" transfer adjustment option to transfer the Transaction from the originating billable task to a non-billable Destination task on the project in question. CORRECT.
    A) SET UP THE WBS TO HAVE A TOP LEVEL NON-BILLABLE TASK, ON EVERY PROJECT, WITH A TASK NUMBER OF :"WRITE-OFF".
    B) WRITE AUTOACCOUNTING RULE , BASED ON TASK NUMBER, TO ENSURE THAT ANY TRANSACTIONS CHARGED (TRANSFERRED) TO "WRITE-OFF" TASK WILL BE POSTED TO A "WRITE-OFF/BAD DEBT" ACCT IN GENERAL LEDGER.
    C) CREATE A DFF AT THE EXPENDITURE ITEM LEVEL WHICH CAN BE POPULATED AT THE TIME OF TRANSFER, TO INDICATE WHERE THE TRX IS BEING TRANSFERRED TO. IT IS TRUE THAT TRANSFER ACTIVITY REPORT WILL TELL YOU THIS AS WELL, BUT IF YOU
    WANT TO SEE IT ONLINE DURING EXPEND. INQ, THEN DFF IS FINE.
    D) AS TO CONCERNS ABOUT "THE INTEGRITY" OF THE TRANSACTION AS IT IS SUBMITTED BY THE EMPLOYEE BEING COMPROMISED, THIS IS CERTAINLY POSSIBLE, BUT IF THIS IS A SERIOUS BUSINESS CONCERN, THEN I WOULD CONSIDER CREATING AN ALERT TO THE EMPLOYEE WHO ENTERED THE ORIGINAL TRX, ADVISING THEM OF THE CHANGE AND REQUESTING THEIR REVIEW AND OR APPROVAL OF THE TRANSFERRED TRX. I CAN SEE THIS BECOMING QUITE CUMBERSOME THOUGH, AND, OVERALL, ACCOUNTING DEPARTMENTS MANIPULATE TRANSACTIONS FOR ACCOUNTING PURPOSES ALL THE TIME AS STANDARD PRACTICE, SO I'M NOT SURE WHY THIS IS AN ISSUE HERE.
    E) AND LASTLY, IT IS TRUE THAT AS A COMMON PRACTICE, EACH PROJECT WILL NEED A
    'WRITE-OFF" TASK AS A STANDARD PART OF IT'S WBS-- SO WHAT? IT'S JUST ONE MORE TASK IN YOUR WBS. BUILD IT INTO YOUR PROJECT TEMPLATES, AND MAKE IT NOT CHARGEABLE UNTIL WRITE OFFS BECOME NECESSARY. AS TO UTILIZATION, THERE IS NOT ENOUGH INFO IN THE CLIENT QUESTION TO ADDRESS THAT ISSUE PROPERLY.
    THAT'S ABOUT IT. HOPE THIS HELPS.
    BEST REGARDS, PAT"
    null

  • Accrual Write-off Amt in Accrual Write-Off & Accrual Recon report not tele

    Hi,
    Need a help here,
    Oracle EBS version : 11.5.10.2
    The Accrual Write-Off Amount in Accrual Write-off report does not tele with the Write-Off Amount shown in Accrual Reconciliation Report, any clues to investigate? This happens for the first time after we apply an Oracle mega patch, in the past, the amount from the 2 reports were always tele.
    Thanks.

    You are right contains both matched and not matched records in this table.
    This is a temp table only, so the actual data is populated from the po and ap/inventory tables
    by the accural reconciliation build process in to this table.
    This table is the staging area for managing accruals - review/write off.
    If you write off the information is marked in both the temp table and also the source tables.
    So next time you re-populate the temp table (accrual reconciliation build) you could wipe the temp
    table and bring the data again but exclude written off transactions.
    Doing mass accrual writeoff is not possible, without a customization.
    Identify what happens in a writeoff and do the same using custom code.
    I have designed such an application at one of my client.

  • Write off process--BAPI/FM ?

    Hi All,
    I've a requirement to do write off goods using a program.
    I've gone through this thread: [write-off the MM inventory stock;
    However, I need a FM or BAPI to pass movement type 551 and cost center?
    I understand to write off, that has to be 'borne' by a cost center..so, should I pass cost center also?
    Also would appreciate what other implications/ considerations I've to make while carrying out the write off process?
    sorry, if am re-posting and this has been answered already..I did some searching but couldn't find hence posting.
    Regards,
    Raghu.

    thanks! I was in the wrong direction I was looking for an Inventory Adjustment process which is done using cycle count and differences posted using MI07 which uses movement type 701/702. So decided to use BAPI_MATPHYSINV_POSTDIFF with phy inventory document and fiscal yr etc..
    Regards,
    Raghu.

  • Write off Stock at Subcontractor End

    Hi Experts,
    We want to write off the stock lying at stock subcontractor end in SAP thru Physical Inventory Adjustment.  No storage location is assigned to subcontractor stock in SAP. Therefore we are finding it difficult to do it thru MI01, MI04, MI07.
    Please guide how it is possible
    Regards
    ( Rajneesh Gulati )

    Why do Physical Inventory, presumably the SC is telling you, you aren't physically checking.  Why not just process a goods issue to destruction, Movement Type 551 etc., through MIGO for O stock category ?
    Cheers,
    Nick

  • Write Off Quantity and value

    hi,
    How do I write off the value and quantity for the stocks?
    For stock materials we do the physical inventory - entering count adjust qty and posting adjust vale . But how can I adjust for value only articles?

    Hi,
    That will be easy for you to post MI10 document .This will write of the quantity and value of that quantity.
    If you want to change the standard price of the material post a MR21 document.
    Regards,

  • Write Off Stock Provided To Vendor

    Hi all
    Could anyone please tell me what movement type to use to write off stock that is showing as provided to vendor.
    Thanks

    If you are using Physical Inventory route you can create an PI document using T Code MI01 do the rest of process as usual and then post difference with Mvt Type 702.
    Amit

  • Stock Write Off

    Hi All
    I need some help on which movement type to use to write off stock directly to a GL account without assigning a Cost Centre.
    Vishnu

    561 Initial entry of stock - unrestricted-use stock
    563 Initial entry of stock - quality inspection
    564 Initial entry of stock - blocked stock
    During initial entry of stock balances, you enter the physical warehouse stock frigures or the book inventory from your old system into the SAP System for productive operation. This data entry usually takes place by means of batch input.
    Possible special stock indicators: E, K, M, O, Q, V, W (565: only E, K, Q)

  • How to Write Off Stock at Subcontractor's End

    Hi Friends,
    Few parts are shown at Subcontractors End in the System which has actually been consumed(returned). Now we want to remove those stock from Subcontractors stock. How can we write off those stock???
    These are very old stocks, is there any other method to consume those materials??
    Please help
    Thanks in Advance,
    Ritesh

    there are diffrent ways to reduce this stock
    either do it by mb1a move typoe 551 and spectiaop stock O
    or by physical inventory  cycle MIO1
    hope this helsp

  • Extra Found HU posting after Write Off

    Hi Experts,
    In one of my scenario, I need to post the extra found HU's in the system after completing the Inventory PRocess ( after WM and MM write off).
    Is there nay way by which I can get the extra found HU in the my current stock now??
    Thanks in Advance.
    Shailendra

    Hi,
    If the table is BKPF then the object is BKPF, FIPP or similar. If you look in transaction SWO2 and find object BKPF it is under the area "Financial Accounting". If you then goto PFTC and enter Workflow Template for Task Type and then F4 on Task and select Structure search, goto the area Financial Accounting and you will see all the workflow templates available.
    Regards,
    Eddie

  • Stock Write-off Report

    Dear Friends,
    Is there a transaction or Report available to see the write-off stock by plant or through any movement types ? Please suggest
    the requirement is as fallows:
    Report needs to be selectable by IPC or ICC. Or plant
    The report will need to show the stock that has been written off in Quantity of the item, the cost of this stock. And where the stock was written off.
    The report should provide a total cost per plant and a total cost per item. At that plant. Where multiple locations are viewed the total cost sum for the plants should be provided.
    Regards
    Prakash

    Hi Prakash
    Could you please clarify the following
    1. Is this write-off stock means stock posted to scrapping (551 mvmt)?
    2. What do you mean by IPC and ICC?
    If you can able to bifurcate the write-off through mvmt 551 (or any other) you may get all your requirements in MB51 report itself.
    Thanks/ GVRR

  • IS-Telecommunication RMCA - FI-CA Write offs

    Dear All,
    This is related to IS-Telecommunication. FI-CA
    Scenario: Invoice has been posted with 1121 $ including tax of 121. It means..
    Customer account    1121  Dr
    Revenue Account 1000 Cr
    VAT on sales 121 Cr.
    When I am trying to do the write off(FP04 by using reason codes). System is posting the document as below:
    VAT on sales account 121 Dr
    Expense account   1000 Dr
       To Customer Account 1121.
    I would like to transfer the total amount to the expense account instead of transfer to VAT account, if I use some specific reason codes (Like Bankruptcy).
    Expected account entry:
    Expense account 1121
    to Customer account 1121.
    I found there is a event 5070 (Write-off: Tax Special Features ) in order to meet the above requirement.
    If any one knows about the requirement and solution. Please advise.
    Thanks in advance
    Ravi

    HI Ravi,
    path is
    SPRO > Financial Accounting > contract A/R A/P > Basic functions > particular aspects of taxation procedure > tax adjustment for write offs
    or
    Tcode
    FQZ04T
    or
    FQC0 and type the posting area .
    thanks,
    VR

  • R12 - Accounts Payable & PO Accrual Reconciliation Report - write offs

    Hi,
    As a relative novice to Oracle I need some help.................
    My question regards the above which is essentially a "goods received not invoiced" report.
    I have a number of items on the report which I would like to write off for two reasons:
    (1) I have a small balance left which is basically the difference between the PO and the accounts payable column - in the region of 1p to 5p (therfore a housekeeping exercise)
    (2) Items that we've never received an invoice for (we've received the stock for free!). ie there is only an entry in the PO column of the report.
    For the above I would like a method of writing off these balances from the report.* This should therefore create a credit in my P&L account.
    Your thoughts please.
    Thanks in advance.
    Jon

    This is the forum for the SQL Developer tool. You need to ask your question in an eBusiness suite forum.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Special GL posting in Logistic Invoice Verification

    Hi.. We want to post / clear down payment / Deduct the amount t to special GL Account. . SAP Standerd not suuport such functionality. Any one using such functionality in LIV (MIRO TRANSACTION).  Need your help / suggestion for same. Thanks in advance

  • A compurter to connect it to how do i fix my phone

    my phone is stuck on the itunes screen and i dont have a computer to connect it to

  • Please let me know whether the new Firefox 7 is compatible with Google Toolbar

    When I tried to download and install the previous version of Firefox (I think it was Firefox 5) on my laptop, the Google Toolbar disappeared. The above happened when the installation was finished ! Thanking you and awaiting your answer.

  • Adobe Reader Assistance

    To Whom it May Concern, I am having difficulty opening Adobe pdf files.  When I attempt to open a file, the following message appears: Adobe Reader has stopped working Windows can check online for a solution to the problem -Check online for a solutio

  • GLC-BX-D(U) SFP

    Hello. I'm choosing SFP for cisco 3750-X. In datasheet for GLC-BX-U(D) min transmit power is -9 dBm, min receive power is -19.5 dB. So max insertion loss in channal is about 10.5 dB. But in this datasheet it's just 5.5 dB for GLC-BX-D and 6 dB for GL