Write-off Storage Type 999

Dears,
The customer accidentally wrote off the complete Storage Type 999 via LI21.
We were able to retrieve the full list of articles and quantities of what was written off. In order to restore the situation, we would like to 'refill' Storage Type 999 with these articles.
Could someone please advice on how to accomplish this? (Inventory on all involved articles is too time-consuming)
Thanks in advance.
M

As per Jacob suggestion you can go with 711 if 712 is posted or 712 if 711 is posted but the basic question is if there is no stock mismatch then why the stock was there in 999 is there any business need to store the stock in 999 as per standard SAP 999 is resolution and ideally if any stock exist then you should reconcile that

Similar Messages

HU without inventory management and message L3778 in storage type 999

Hi experts,
Need suggestion on the process to add inventory of an HU with status 'HU without inventory Management'. This issue has occurred out of the below scenario:
1. our warehouse is HU & WM managed.
2. We have a transfer order for a delivery document requesting to pick up 100 cases of MAT1 which is assigned to HU1.
3. While confirming the transfer order user has confirmed difference for the full quantity of 100 because the SU/HU was not found in the bin.
4. The system has set the status of HU as 'HU without inventory Management'. The HU is empty.
5. system has moved the stock from the bin to difference storage type 999.
Now user has found the stock for this HU and he wants to post the stock back into the bin. system does not allow to move the stock back to bin using LT01 as we get error message 'L3 778'.
What will be the best practice to get the stock back into the bin and post the stock into the same old HU.
Is there a process wherein we can post this stock to another bin and repack into the old HU?
Thanks,
Harish

Thanks Manish on the hint. I was able to transfer stock to partner location and then bring back to original Storage type/Bin. Below steps was used to fixed the issue:
1. Initiate a transfer of stock from WM/HU Sloc where the IM stock resides into Sloc 9099. An outbound delivery is created during this process.
2. Create a transfer order with reference to delivery and pick the stock from 999 storage type.
3. Create a Pick HU using LH01 and assign the HU on the pallet to the transfer order.
4. Confirm the transfer order using LT12.
5. Perform PGI for the delivery.
6. Use HUMO to display the HU and then you can transfer the stock back to WM/HU location using the storage location transfer option available on the HUMO screen(EDIT à change HU posting à Storage location)
7. Perform Bin to bin transfer to move the SU from 921 storage type to putaway the HU/SU back to the destined Storage type/Bin.
Best Regards,
Harish

Stock in storage type 999

Hi,
       Actually when we confirm a picking stock transfer order, if it has diferences, stock goes automatically to 999 storage type.
We have the problem that ATP (sales availability) looks at plant level, so if the stock in 999 is unrestric, sales orders confirm that stock (if no stock in other storage type).
So, we have to block or to put in quality control.
There is an standar procedure that when we confirm diferences in the picking stock transfer, stock goes automatically to 999 storage type, but like block stock? It means, that sap change the status automatically of the stock that goes to 999 storage type?
Thanks in advance for the help.
Regards
Enzo

Hello,
During sales order creation, avaibility check carried out at IM level. Hence even though you block the quant at storage type level, stock would be available for sales. I would suggest following
( 1) configure posting change LQ02- of WM-IM by going in to following path
       OLML--->WM>Interface>Inventory management-->Define posting change -
>define movement type
      configure unrestricted to block and block to unrestricted movement type for your warehouse.
(2) Schedule background job of LQ02 transaction code -- Program RLLQ0200 with variant as 999 storage type, your warehouse number and WM movement type of unrestricted to block. Schedule the job at regular interval.
The result of this schedule is, stock would be blocked in IM as well as WH level and will not be available for sales.
Thanks,
Milind

Write-off (Mvt type: 551) in batch

Hi experts, as titled, I am looking for ways to do write-off using movement type 551 in batch, as in doing write-off for a couple of sites (stores) at the same time.
I have come up with below.
1. Either to do stock adjustment (e.g. MIGO, MB1C, MB1A) in batch, but the standard only supports doing adjustment one site by one site
2. Use T-code MI31 which supposedly can support adjustment in batches, but it has predetermined movement type of 701/702.
Would you have other greater methods for this scenario?
Thanks and BR
Dom

Hi Dom,
what do you mean one site by one site? Each document line has it's own plant, you can have different plants in different lines...
regards,
Edgar

711 PI write off question

Hi All
To speed up the PI process I have tested that you can move the 'lost stock' quantity from one storage type and bin to the 999 storage type using LT01 and then write off using LI21.
It creates the correct 711 movement type for stock write off.
What are the pitfalls in adopting this method?
Thanks in advance
Darren

Hi Jurgen
Strange but true!
I counted the actual clicks and key presses it takes to process an individual stock adjustment for one part number using LICC, LI11N, LI20 and LI21. It took less clicks and key presses using standard SAp PI than any other write off process I have tested. They included writing off to a cost centre and my previous test of moving the stock difference from its bin to a bin in storage type 999 that just needed LI21 to write off. (even when the processes I have tested have less T-codes!)
I was going to use the LT01 and LI21 process that I tested for just writing off stock adjustments as and when the warehouse staff find a discrepency.
I have a company reluctance to use SAP PI as it "has too many transactions and is too complicated".
Thanks for your suggestion Jurgen, I will enlighten the necessary people.....
Regards
Darren

Issue with clearing the Differences in 999 storage type in HU managed S.Loc

Hi Experts,
We are trying to writeoff the differences stocks which are there in 999 storage type, but getting an error message 'Quantity difference document line item for HU's' with Message class L6 & Message number 606. Any idea how this can be resolved?
I can see that for this product/batch combination there is another HU in packing area 923 which is acting as a SU because the item level details are deleted for this HU. Could this be the issue for the errror? Would need some pointers to clear this stocks.
Thanks,
Harish

The item details of the HU seems to be have deleted, causing the difference between HU, IM/WM stocks. We have deleted the HU using HUMO & then the HU difference quantity was posted using HUDIFF.
Thanks,
Harish

Auto Confirmation of transfer order - 999 mvt from storage type W01 to S01

Hi,
I am trying to automate the confirmation of transfer orders between storage type W01 and S01 using a 999 movement type. The 999 movement type appears to work perfectly when doing a bin to bin movement within the W01 storage type (for example move batch abc from bin 01 to bin 02) no confirmations are required. However if I transfer from a bin in W01 storage type to the S01 storage type (which only has a single bin to represent a staging area) a manual confirmation of the transfer order is required via lt24 or lt12. It appears therefore that the issue is with the storage type S01 for this particular Warehouse. The setting to confirm the TO immediately is already activated for movt 999 in customizing, is there a setting for the storage type that must be defined.
Regards,

F1 help for field V_T333-SQUIT:
Means that the transfer order item can be confirmed immediately during the creation procedure.
SAP online help:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/c6/f83e4d4afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
To set the confirmation requirement for foreground processing, select the indicator for TO item can be confirmed immediately.
As per my understanding the immediate confirmation indicator does not mean that the transfer order will be confirmed immediately. It makes possible that during the creation of transfer order you CAN put a flag in the confirmation checkbox.
If you use it together with "propose confirmation" flag (setting for WM movement type; V_T333-VQUIT), the falg in confirmation check box will be populated automatically during TO creation.
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on May 10, 2011 11:22 AM

No difference qty was posted to 999 storage type

Dear Experts,
I confirmed a TO with differences.   The Confir Diffrences winod pops up in LT12 and I confirm the TO with differences.
But however, no difference qty was posted to 999 storage type.   999 storage type has no qty
Why is this so?   what is the config needed?   Please advise
Regards
Shetty

Found answer: Channged difference indicator

MR11 Write-Offs (KP doc type) not clearing

A maintenance adjustment transaction (MR11) was executed to 'write-off' the open receipts on a purchase order. All purchase order items have the same accounting (Profit Center, GL Acct, Comp Code). The MR11 transaction creates a KP (account maintenance document) which is posted against the PO line and is cleared against the receipt accounting document(s).
A clearing document should be created to offset the receipt/invoice document with the maintenance document.
For some reason, part of the items that were 'maintenanced' on the PO did not get cleared, while other items did get cleared. Our internal SAP GL super users have reviewed the documents and cannot understand why some of these did not clear.
Thoughts?

Hi
Please check whether there are "quantity differences" in those POs. If not, then MR11 will not do. Also please check whether the account assignment of those POs are "order". If so, settlement is the way forward to close the PO.
Jayaram

Write off Stock at Subcontractor End

Hi Experts,
We want to write off the stock lying at stock subcontractor end in SAP thru Physical Inventory Adjustment. No storage location is assigned to subcontractor stock in SAP. Therefore we are finding it difficult to do it thru MI01, MI04, MI07.
Please guide how it is possible
Regards
( Rajneesh Gulati )

Why do Physical Inventory, presumably the SC is telling you, you aren't physically checking. Why not just process a goods issue to destruction, Movement Type 551 etc., through MIGO for O stock category ?
Cheers,
Nick

Regard an error "Storage type & notsuitable as interface (SU mgmt is active

Hi All,
I am trying to do the inventory clearing in both warehouse and Inventory management using the transactions LI20 and LI21 after counting the inventory. But whenever I am trying to do the writeoff's I am facing with an error "Storage type & not suitable as an interface (SU management is active)"
I couldnt able to figure out the main cause for this error. Your valuable suggestions would be highly appreciated.
Regards,
Shane

Hi Jürgen L,
My objective is to do physical inventory and of ther are any differences then write them........in this sytem Both Grants and fund management is involved?
I am getting this message while I am doing LI21. And you have suggested that, the difference storage type SU managed. which is a 999 storage type. and this is not SU managed.
I would also like to ask regarding the clearing of differences in warehouse and Inventory mangement. I am using the mvmt types 711 and 712, But what account documents will get generated. I am thinking there will be no account documents that will get generated. Adding to this I am getting "Account 6701 requires an assignment to a CO object with Message no. KI235". If we do this assignment to this CO object......... doesnt the transaction go and hit the balance sheet account.
I am lil baffled with this whole process. If you could give me your valuable information, that will help me a lot.
Shane.

LT04 - User exit to add storage type and storage bin

Hi!
I am looking for a user exit to populate the destination storage type and storage bin (Fields-LTAP-nltyp and LTAP-NLPLA). The user uses tcode LT04 to createt transfer orders from transfer requirements.
The program name is SAPML03T.
Please let me know if anyone has any clue.
Thanks in advance,
Manasa
Message was edited by:
        manasa

I don't the exact User-Exit...And there are like 104 of them...So why don't you use this report (Not mine) and find out yourself -:)
REPORT zdummy_atg_2.
TABLES : TSTC,
TADIR,
MODSAPT,
MODACT,
TRDIR,
TFDIR,
ENLFDIR,
SXS_ATTRT ,
TSTCT.
DATA : JTAB LIKE TADIR OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA : FIELD1(30).
DATA : V_DEVCLASS LIKE TADIR-DEVCLASS.
PARAMETERS : P_TCODE LIKE TSTC-TCODE,
P_PGMNA LIKE TSTC-PGMNA .
DATA WA_TADIR TYPE TADIR.
START-OF-SELECTION.
IF NOT P_TCODE IS INITIAL.
    SELECT SINGLE * FROM TSTC WHERE TCODE EQ P_TCODE.
ELSEIF NOT P_PGMNA IS INITIAL.
    TSTC-PGMNA = P_PGMNA.
ENDIF.
IF SY-SUBRC EQ 0.
    SELECT SINGLE * FROM TADIR
    WHERE PGMID = 'R3TR'
    AND OBJECT = 'PROG'
    AND OBJ_NAME = TSTC-PGMNA.
    MOVE : TADIR-DEVCLASS TO V_DEVCLASS.
    IF SY-SUBRC NE 0.
      SELECT SINGLE * FROM TRDIR
      WHERE NAME = TSTC-PGMNA.
      IF TRDIR-SUBC EQ 'F'.
        SELECT SINGLE * FROM TFDIR
        WHERE PNAME = TSTC-PGMNA.
        SELECT SINGLE * FROM ENLFDIR
        WHERE FUNCNAME = TFDIR-FUNCNAME.
        SELECT SINGLE * FROM TADIR
        WHERE PGMID = 'R3TR'
        AND OBJECT = 'FUGR'
        AND OBJ_NAME EQ ENLFDIR-AREA.
        MOVE : TADIR-DEVCLASS TO V_DEVCLASS.
      ENDIF.
    ENDIF.
    SELECT * FROM TADIR INTO TABLE JTAB
    WHERE PGMID = 'R3TR'
    AND OBJECT IN ('SMOD', 'SXSD')
    AND DEVCLASS = V_DEVCLASS.
    SELECT SINGLE * FROM TSTCT
    WHERE SPRSL EQ SY-LANGU
    AND TCODE EQ P_TCODE.
    FORMAT COLOR COL_POSITIVE INTENSIFIED OFF.
    WRITE:/(19) 'Transaction Code - ',
    20(20) P_TCODE,
    45(50) TSTCT-TTEXT.
    SKIP.
    IF NOT JTAB[] IS INITIAL.
      WRITE:/(105) SY-ULINE.
      FORMAT COLOR COL_HEADING INTENSIFIED ON.
* Sorting the internal Table
      SORT JTAB BY OBJECT.
      DATA : WF_TXT(60) TYPE C,
      WF_SMOD TYPE I ,
      WF_BADI TYPE I ,
      WF_OBJECT2(30) TYPE C.
      CLEAR : WF_SMOD, WF_BADI , WF_OBJECT2.
* Get the total SMOD.
      LOOP AT JTAB INTO WA_TADIR.
        AT FIRST.
          FORMAT COLOR COL_HEADING INTENSIFIED ON.
          WRITE:/1 SY-VLINE,
          2 'Enhancement/ Business Add-in',
          41 SY-VLINE ,
          42 'Description',
          105 SY-VLINE.
          WRITE:/(105) SY-ULINE.
        ENDAT.
        CLEAR WF_TXT.
        AT NEW OBJECT.
          IF WA_TADIR-OBJECT = 'SMOD'.
            WF_OBJECT2 = 'Enhancement' .
          ELSEIF WA_TADIR-OBJECT = 'SXSD'.
            WF_OBJECT2 = ' Business Add-in'.
          ENDIF.
          FORMAT COLOR COL_GROUP INTENSIFIED ON.
          WRITE:/1 SY-VLINE,
          2 WF_OBJECT2,
          105 SY-VLINE.
        ENDAT.
        CASE WA_TADIR-OBJECT.
          WHEN 'SMOD'.
            WF_SMOD = WF_SMOD + 1.
            SELECT SINGLE MODTEXT INTO WF_TXT
            FROM MODSAPT
            WHERE SPRSL = SY-LANGU
            AND NAME = WA_TADIR-OBJ_NAME.
            FORMAT COLOR COL_NORMAL INTENSIFIED OFF.
          WHEN 'SXSD'.
* For BADis
            WF_BADI = WF_BADI + 1 .
            SELECT SINGLE TEXT INTO WF_TXT
            FROM SXS_ATTRT
            WHERE SPRSL = SY-LANGU
            AND EXIT_NAME = WA_TADIR-OBJ_NAME.
            FORMAT COLOR COL_NORMAL INTENSIFIED ON.
        ENDCASE.
        WRITE:/1 SY-VLINE,
        2 WA_TADIR-OBJ_NAME HOTSPOT ON,
        41 SY-VLINE ,
        42 WF_TXT,
        105 SY-VLINE.
        AT END OF OBJECT.
          WRITE : /(105) SY-ULINE.
        ENDAT.
      ENDLOOP.
      WRITE:/(105) SY-ULINE.
      SKIP.
      FORMAT COLOR COL_TOTAL INTENSIFIED ON.
      WRITE:/ 'No.of Exits:' , WF_SMOD.
      WRITE:/ 'No.of BADis:' , WF_BADI.
    ELSE.
      FORMAT COLOR COL_NEGATIVE INTENSIFIED ON.
      WRITE:/(105) 'No userexits or BADis exist'.
    ENDIF.
ELSE.
    FORMAT COLOR COL_NEGATIVE INTENSIFIED ON.
    WRITE:/(105) 'Transaction does not exist'.
ENDIF.
AT LINE-SELECTION.
DATA : WF_OBJECT TYPE TADIR-OBJECT.
CLEAR WF_OBJECT.
GET CURSOR FIELD FIELD1.
CHECK FIELD1(8) EQ 'WA_TADIR'.
READ TABLE JTAB WITH KEY OBJ_NAME = SY-LISEL+1(20).
MOVE JTAB-OBJECT TO WF_OBJECT.
CASE WF_OBJECT.
    WHEN 'SMOD'.
      SET PARAMETER ID 'MON' FIELD SY-LISEL+1(10).
      CALL TRANSACTION 'SMOD' AND SKIP FIRST SCREEN.
    WHEN 'SXSD'.
      SET PARAMETER ID 'EXN' FIELD SY-LISEL+1(20).
      CALL TRANSACTION 'SE18' AND SKIP FIRST SCREEN.
ENDCASE.
Greetings,
Blag.

Write-on/Write-off Vehicle

Hi All,
I am new to VMS..
My Requirement ---write-off the vehicle. using movement type and cost center...
Is there any standard transaction available for Write-off/write-on...
Please provide valuable Suggestion ..
Moderator message: please search for available information/documentation.
Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Oct 28, 2011 10:50 AM

I am getting confused
You and me both!!
I am as certain as I can be that after doing my 702 write off there were no TOs or TRs created and the WM stock is sitting in the exact same storage type in LS26 as it was before I wrote off the stock and there doesn't appeart to be any other negative stocks in LS26 corresponding to my write off.
I have discussed it further with the business and for the write-off issue, they are happy to write stock back on using a 701 movement and then write it off correctly using the 712 movements. e.g.
Current
WM 10
IM 0
701 Write On
WM 10
IM 10
712 Write Off
WM 0
IM 0
This will satisfy them for the write offs as from an IM point of view it will be a write on followed by a write off and from a WM point of view the stock will then leave correctly.
However, we can not do the same thing for our stock that was wrote on as it has already been moved on from an IM point of view so the orginal question is still there. Is there a way we can write on stock from a WM point-of-view without updating the IM stock.

Stock Write-off Report

Dear Friends,
Is there a transaction or Report available to see the write-off stock by plant or through any movement types ? Please suggest
the requirement is as fallows:
Report needs to be selectable by IPC or ICC. Or plant
The report will need to show the stock that has been written off in Quantity of the item, the cost of this stock. And where the stock was written off.
The report should provide a total cost per plant and a total cost per item. At that plant. Where multiple locations are viewed the total cost sum for the plants should be provided.
Regards
Prakash

Hi Prakash
Could you please clarify the following
1. Is this write-off stock means stock posted to scrapping (551 mvmt)?
2. What do you mean by IPC and ICC?
If you can able to bifurcate the write-off through mvmt 551 (or any other) you may get all your requirements in MB51 report itself.
Thanks/ GVRR

IS-Telecommunication RMCA - FI-CA Write offs

Dear All,
This is related to IS-Telecommunication. FI-CA
Scenario: Invoice has been posted with 1121 $ including tax of 121. It means..
Customer account    1121 Dr
Revenue Account 1000 Cr
VAT on sales 121 Cr.
When I am trying to do the write off(FP04 by using reason codes). System is posting the document as below:
VAT on sales account 121 Dr
Expense account   1000 Dr
   To Customer Account 1121.
I would like to transfer the total amount to the expense account instead of transfer to VAT account, if I use some specific reason codes (Like Bankruptcy).
Expected account entry:
Expense account 1121
to Customer account 1121.
I found there is a event 5070 (Write-off: Tax Special Features ) in order to meet the above requirement.
If any one knows about the requirement and solution. Please advise.
Thanks in advance
Ravi

HI Ravi,
path is
SPRO > Financial Accounting > contract A/R A/P > Basic functions > particular aspects of taxation procedure > tax adjustment for write offs
or
Tcode
FQZ04T
or
FQC0 and type the posting area .
thanks,
VR

Write-off Storage Type 999

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for