Write-on/Write-off Vehicle

Hi All,
I am new to VMS..
My Requirement ---write-off the vehicle. using movement type and cost center...
Is there any standard transaction available for Write-off/write-on...
Please provide valuable Suggestion ..
Moderator message: please search for available information/documentation.
Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Oct 28, 2011 10:50 AM

I am getting confused
You and me both!!
I am as certain as I can be that after doing my 702 write off there were no TOs or TRs created and the WM stock is sitting in the exact same storage type in LS26 as it was before I wrote off the stock and there doesn't appeart to be any other negative stocks in LS26 corresponding to my write off.
I have discussed it further with the business and for the write-off issue, they are happy to write stock back on using a 701 movement and then write it off correctly using the 712 movements. e.g.
Current
WM 10
IM 0
701 Write On
WM 10
IM 10
712 Write Off
WM 0
IM 0
This will satisfy them for the write offs as from an IM point of view it will be a write on followed by a write off and from a WM point of view the stock will then leave correctly.
However, we can not do the same thing for our stock that was wrote on as it has already been moved on from an IM point of view so the orginal question is still there. Is there a way we can write on stock from a WM point-of-view without updating the IM stock.

Similar Messages

Is there a way to turn off using ram as intermediary when transfering files between 2 internal hdds? (write cache is off on all drives)

right forum? first time here. none of the options seem perfect. so i guess this applies to 'setup.' i tried to describe what's happening verbosely from the start of a file transfer to completion of writing file to 2nd hard drive.
win 7 64bit home - i2600k 3.4ghz - 8gb of ram - 2hdd 1 ssd
I have this problem when transferring files between 2 internal hard drives. one is unhealthy (slow write speeds but not looking for advice to replace it because it serves its unimportant purpose). so, the unhealthy drive drops into PIO mode - that's acceptable.
however, a little over 1gb of any file transfer is cached in RAM during the file transfer. after the file transfer window closes, indicating the transfer is "complete" (HA!), it still has 1gb to write from RAM which takes about 30minutes. This would
not be a problem if it did not also earmark an additional 5gb of ram (never in use), leaving 1gb or less 'free' for programs. this needlessly causes my pc to be sluggish - moreso than a typical file transfer file between 2 healthy drives. i have windows write
caching turned off on all drives. so this is a different setting i can't figure out nor find after 2 hours of google searches.
info from taskmanager and resource monitor.
idle estimates: total 8175, cached 532, available 7218, free 6771 and the graph in taskman shows about 1gb memory in use.
at the start of a file transfer: 8175, 2661, 6070, 4511free and ~2gb of ram used in graph. No problems, yet.
however, as the transfer goes on, the free ram value drops to less than 1gb (1gb normal +1gb temporary transfer cache +5gb of unused earmarked space = ~7gb), cached value increases, but the amount of used ram remains relatively unchanged (2gb
during transfer and slowly drops to idle values as remaining bits are written to the 2nd hard drive). the free value is even slower to return to idle norms after the transfer completes writing data to 2nd hard drive from RAM. so, it's earmarking an addition
5gb of ram that are completely unused during this process. *****This is my problem*****
Is there any way to turn this function off or limit its maximum size. in addition to sluggishness, it poses risk to data integrity from system errors/power loss, and it's difficult to discern the actual time of transfer completion, which makes it difficult
to know when it's safe to shutdown my pc (any data left in ram is lost, and the file transfer is ruined - as of now i have to use resmon and look through what's writing to disk2 -> sometimes easy to forget about it when the transfer window closed 20-30minutes
ago and the file is still in the process of writing to the 2nd disk).
Any solution would be nice, and a little extra info like whether it can be applied to only 1 hard drive would be excellent.

Thanks for the reply.
(Although i have an undergrad degeee in computers, it's been 15years and my vocab is terrible. so, i will try my best. keep an open mind. it's not my occupation, so i rarely have to communicate ideas regarding PCs)
It operates the same way regardless of the write-cache option being enabled. It's not using the 5gb for read/write buffer - it's merely bloating standby memory during the transfer process at a rate similar to the write speed of destination (for my situation).
at this point i don't expect a solution. i've tried to look through lists of known memory leaks but i dont have the vocabulary to be 100% certain this problem is not documented. as of now it can't affect many people - NAS's with low bandwidth networks, usb
attached storage etc. do bugs get forwarded from these forums? below i can outline the consistent and repeatable nature not only on my pc but on others' pcs as well (2012 forum post i found).
I've been testing and paying a little more attention and i can describe it better:
Just the Facts
Resmon Memory Info: "In Use" stays consistent ~1gb (idle amount and roughly the same when nothing else is running during file transfer)
"Modified" contains file transfer
data (meta data?) which remains consistent at little over 1gb (minor fluctuations due to working as a buffer). After the file transfer window closes "Modified" slowly diminishes as it finishes lazy writing (i believe that's the term). I forget idle
pc amount, but after transfer this is ony 58mb)
"Standby" as the transfer starts it immediately rises to ~2gb. I'm sure this initial jump is normal. However, it will bloat well over 5gb over time with a large enough transfer increasing at a consistent rate during the entire transfer
process. the crux of the matter.
"Free" will drop as far as 35-50megabytes over time.
as the transfer starts, the "Standby" increases by an immediate chunk then at a slow rate throughout entire transfer process(~1mb/s). once writing metadata to RAM no longer occurs, the "Modified" ram slowly (@500kb/s matching resmon disk
activity for that file write) diminishes as it finishes lazy writing, After file is 100% written to destination drive, "Standby" remains a bloated figure long after.
a 1.4gb transfer filled 3677MB of "Standby" by the time writing finished and modified ram cleared. after 20minutes, it's still bloated at 3696MB. after 30-40mins it's down to 2300mb - this is about what it jumps immediately to when transfer starts
- it now remains at this level until i reboot.
I notice the "standby" is available to programs. but they do not operate well. e.g. a 480p trailer on IMDB.com will stop-and-go every 2-3seconds (stream buffers fine/fast) - this would be during the worst case scenario of 35-50mb "Free"
ram. my pc isn't and never was the latest and greatest, but choppy video never happens even with 1 or 2 resource hogs running (video processing/encoding, games, etc).
Conjecture Below
i think it's a problem when one device is significantly slower at writing than the source device - this is the factor that i share with others having this problem. when data is written to modified ram then sent to destination, standby memory is expanded
until it completely or nearly fills all available RAM - If the transfer size is large enough relative to how slow the write speed of destination device is. otherwise it fills it up as much as the file size/write speed issue allows. the term "memory leak"
is used below but may not technically be one, but it's an apt description in layman's terms.
i saw a similar post in these forums (link at end). My problem is repeatable and consistent with others' reports. I wasn't sure if i should revive it with a reply. some of these online message boards (maybe not this one) are extremely picky
and sensitive, lol.the world will end if an old thread revives - even if for a good reason.
i can answer some of the ancillary issues. one person (Friday, September 21, 2012 8:33 PM) mentions not being able to shutdown, i asume he means stuck on the shutdown screen - this is because lazy writing has not completed - his nas write speed is significantly
slower than reading from source - the last bits of data left in ram still needs to be writen to the destination. shutdown will stall for as long as needed until the data finishes writing to destination to prevent data loss.
another person (Monday, September 24, 2012 6:31 PM) mentions the rate of the leak, but the rate is more likely a function of read speed from source relative to write speed of destination. which explains why my standby expands closer to a 1:1 ratio compared
to his 1:100 (he said 10mb per 1000mb)
we all have the same exact results/behaviour, but slightly different rates of bloating/leaking. as the file is written from from the ram to the destination, standby increases during this time - not a problem if read and write speeds are roughly equal (unless
your transfering a terabytes then i bet the problem could rear its head). when writing lags, it gives the opportunity for standby ram to bloat with no maximum except the amount of installed ram. slower the write speed, the worse the problem.
The reply on Wednesday, September 26, 2012 3:04 AM has before and after pictures of exactly what i described in
"Just the Facts". Specifically the resmon image showing the Memory Tab.
The kb2647452 hotfix seems to do some weird things relative to this problem. in the posts that mention they've applied it: after file completes it looks like the "standby" bloat is now "in use" bloat. as per info from Tuesday, October
09, 2012 10:36 PM - bobmtl in an earlier post applies the patch. compare images from earlier posts to his post on this date. seems like a worse problem. Also, his process list indicates it's very unlikely they add up to ~4gb as listed in the color coded bar.
wheres the extra gb's coming from? likely the same culprit of what filled up "standby" memory for me and others. it looks like this patch relative to this problem merely recategorizes the bloat - just changes the title it falls under.
Link:
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windows/en-US/955b600f-976d-4c09-86dc-2ff19e726baf/memory-leak-in-windows-7-64bit-when-writing-to-a-network-shared-disk?forum=w7itpronetworking

Need to an OutputStream or Writer to write in a file

Hello,
I my java class, I need to an OutputStream or a Writer to write in a file. The problem is that I am in a webapp.
To get an inputStream, I use this :
InputStream is = this.getClass().getResourceAsStream("RELATIVE_PATH_IN_WEBAPP");
But it doesn't exist a correspondance for the outputstream.
With this code :
Writer writer = new FileWriter("RELATIVE�_PATH_IN_WEBAPP");
I cannot find the file because it looks for my application server relative path.

Ok but I think it doesn't help me.
To explain : I have a servlet that calls a service in a Java class :
public class MyServlet extends HttpServlet{
public void init(){
MyService service = new MyService();
String file = "RELATIVE_PATH_IN_WEBAPP//myfile.xml";
service.createFile(file);
In MyService class :
public void createFile(String file){
XMLWriter writer = new XMLWriter( //dom4j API
new FileWriter(file) );
writer.write( document );
But this doesn't looks for my file in the relative path of the webapp.

What triggers a write-through/write-behind of entry processor changes?

What triggers a write-through/write-behind when a cache entry is modified by a custom entry processor (subclass of AbstractProcessor)? Is it simply the call to Entry.setValue() that triggers this or are entry modifications detected in some other way?
The reason I am asking is that in our Coherence cluster it looks like some entry modifications through entry processors have not triggered a write-behind, and I see no logical pattern as to which ones have and which ones haven't except that some specific entries are just never written to our database. We see from our logs that our implementation of the CacheStore.store() method is not called in these cases, and we also see that the cache entry has been modified successfully.
We are using Coherence 3.3 on a three machine cluster with 8 nodes on each machine, accessed from clients through a TCP extend proxy.
Regards,
Mikael Carlstedt
mBlox Inc
Edited by: user3849225 on 16-Sep-2010 04:57

Hi Mikael
Calling setEntry() will result in a call to the CacheStore.store() method unless the value you are setting is the same as the existing entry value. If you are using writebehind then storeAll() will be called instead of store() if there are multiple entries waiting to be stored. Writebehind will also coelesce entries so that only the last entry for a given key will be stored.
What patch level are you using?
Paul
Edited by: pmackin on Sep 17, 2010 12:08 AM

Serial Write - 8Mb file to write. Write command can only do 256 Bytes at a time. How to split up?

First, thanks for this resource. I've used this forum quite a bit as a "lurker" and it's gotten me this far. Hoping to learn a bit, so I can contribute
Anyway, my issue is this:
I am ultimately trying to write an 8Mb binary file to an 8Mb Serial Flash device via the Total Phase Aardvark. The writes to the flash device I am using are limited to 256 bytes per write command. The vi program attached is capable of writing 256 bytes at a time, but not anything more. I realize I need to incorporate some sort of "For Loop" (and I understand that I'd want to do it =(File Size)/256 interations, but I can't seem to figure out how.
Does anyone have any quick advice to drive me in the right direction?
Thank you!
Attachments:
Aardvark bin test 02.vi ‏33 KB

Well, you seem to have answered your own question, so it's not clear what your specific issue is. Is it how to extract 256 bytes at a time?
As for the code... umm... I'm not entirely sure what you're trying to accomplish with the whole top half of your code, but it seems to me that almost the whole thing can be replaced by a single call to the Read Binary File function. What is the format of these binary files?

HP dvd writer/cd writer combo on HP Pavilion 735w not working in Windows 7 Home Premium

My cd/dvd writer combo on my HP Pavilion 735w is not working at all now. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Hi,
Try this link and see if you can find a firmware up date.
Have you tried running diagnostics on the CD/DVD drive?
This is a User Forum so HP Tech support does not monitor the postings.
HP DV9700, t9300, Nvidia 8600, 4GB, Crucial C300 128GB SSD
HP Photosmart Premium C309G, HP Photosmart 6520
HP Touchpad, HP Chromebook 11
Custom i7-4770k,Z-87, 8GB, Vertex 3 SSD, Samsung EVO SSD, Corsair HX650,GTX 760
Custom i7-4790k,Z-97, 16GB, Vertex 3 SSD, Plextor M.2 SSD, Samsung EVO SSD, Corsair HX650, GTX 660TI
Windows 7/8 UEFI/Legacy mode, MBR/GPT

On RAID 10 - How to relieve Log Writer Slow Write Time Trace Files

We have a DELL 8 CPU 5460 3.16Ghz Xeon with Dell Open Manage RAID 10 array
Oracle 10g 10.2.0.4 on RedHat EL 5 with
filesystemio_options='' (DEFAULT)
disk_asynch_io='TRUE' ( NOT DEFAULT)
Running 2 instances 64 bit 10g 10.2.0.4 with an app that does a lot of row updates and uses BLOBs heavily.
Our storage (RAID 10) is presented through a single mount point.
I periodically see these messages in a lgwr trc file as follows
Warning: log write time 560ms, size 5549KB
*** 2010-02-25 17:22:24.574
Warning: log write time 650ms, size 6759KB
*** 2010-02-25 17:22:25.103
Warning: log write time 510ms, size 73KB
*** 2010-02-25 20:33:00.015
Warning: log write time 540ms, size 318KB
*** 2010-02-25 20:35:17.956
Warning: log write time 800ms, size 5KB
Note that most of these are larger chunks of data.
Our log wait histogram is as follows:
106 log file parallel write 1 465780158
106 log file parallel write 2 5111874
106 log file parallel write 4 5957262
106 log file parallel write 8 2171240
106 log file parallel write 16 1576186
106 log file parallel write 32 1129199
106 log file parallel write 64 852217
106 log file parallel write 128 2092462
106 log file parallel write 256 508494
106 log file parallel write 512 109449
106 log file parallel write 1024 55441
106 log file parallel write 2048 11403
106 log file parallel write 4096 1197
106 log file parallel write 8192 29
106 log file parallel write 16384 5
In discussions with the group that builds and maintains the systems (DBA's do not) we have asked for more spindles / hba's / mount points to address this issue. We have been advised that since the RAID 10 spreads the I/Os across multiple drives this is not going to affect the situation.
Our thoughts are that multiple HBAs going to separate RAID 10 devices would help relieve the pressure.
Thank you.

Is this an internal RAID array? Is it composed of SCSI (SAS) or SATA drives? How many drives are in the array?
Does the RAID controller have a built in battery backed cache (some of Dell's RAID controllers have 128MB, 256MB, or 512MB of battery backed cache). If the RAID controller has a battery backed cache, consider disabling the caching of all read operations, and set the write policy to write-back (see: http://support.dell.com/support/edocs/software/svradmin/5.1/en/omss_ug/html/cntrls.html ).
Charles Hooper
Co-author of "Expert Oracle Practices: Oracle Database Administration from the Oak Table"
http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/
IT Manager/Oracle DBA
K&M Machine-Fabricating, Inc.

In Adobe Forms where to write to write Program lines

Hi All,
In Adobe Interactive Forms , in SFP transaction where do we write Program lines.
In smar forms , roight clik flow logic and program lines creates an area for program line, what is the euqualiant to this in adobe forms.
Please help me out on this.
Thanks,
Praveen

Hi,
Please check the following links,
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/d4fe7fca-0b01-0010-569a-9a9c1ddf4132
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/docs?rid=/webcontent/uuid/7c3bc67e-0c01-0010-dbb3-908315896909 [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/docs?rid=/webcontent/uuid/7c3bc67e-0c01-0010-dbb3-908315896909 [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
/people/vani.krishnamoorthy/blog/2006/05/17/fillable-adobe-forms-using-abap

How can I see what I write while "write on" is enabled

I want to track what I write on my graphic tablet. When I apply the "Write On" behavior afterwards, all strokes are "written" with the same speed, so it has to be the "live" version of "Write On".
My problem is: When I lift the pen, for example to draw the dot on the "i", I cannot see what I drew before. In the case of the i-Dot this is OK, but when it comes to multiple letters, its a problem. Is there a way to display what I wrote immediately after I lift the pen, so I don't have to write "in darkness"?

Select it in the Finder and choose Get Info from the File menu.
(86668)

Why write(13), write(10)?

I have a book that contains a sample program that illustrates the use of Sockets, and there is some code in that program that I do not understand. It says:
String host = new String("somehost.com");
int port = 4444;
Socket sock = new Socket(host, port);
DataOutputStream out = new DataOutputStream(sock.getOutputStream());
out.writeBytes("Some Text");
out.write(13); //this is the part
out.write(10); //I was wondering about
out.flush();
...Why does this say write(13) and write(10)? I would really appreciate some help. Thank you.

so that the other side would know that end of line has been reached.
on unix the EOL char is \n tahts 10, but on Windows you find it to be \n\r tahts 10 and 13, and the same EOL sequence is used in networking as well (if i'm not mistaking)
i hope it's more clearer for you now.

Nano freezes when turning off vehicle (Volvo station wagon)

I just got a new Volvo wagon that has an iPod interface. I bought a new iPod Nano to hook up to its built-in adapter. When the car is running, it works fine but when I turn off the engine, the Nano completely freezes up and has to be reset.
Any ideas on how to fix thi?

I just got a new Volvo wagon that has an iPod
interface. I bought a new iPod Nano to hook up to
its built-in adapter. When the car is running, it
works fine but when I turn off the engine, the Nano
completely freezes up and has to be reset.
Any ideas on how to fix thi?
Yes... remove Nano before turning off engine.

Dvd writer/cd writer dvd-=rom hp mediA CENTER PC M7160NPENTIUM D WINDOWS XP

I Wa wondering if any body new or new how to get the location and purpose of each pin coming from dvd AND CD

Ascottbag, welcome to the forum.
Here is a guide that may help you solve your problem. Please let us know if it helps or not.
Signature:
HP TouchPad - 1.2 GHz; 1 GB memory; 32 GB storage; WebOS/CyanogenMod 11(Kit Kat)
HP 10 Plus; Android-Kit Kat; 1.0 GHz Allwinner A31 ARM Cortex A7 Quad Core Processor ; 2GB RAM Memory Long: 2 GB DDR3L SDRAM (1600MHz); 16GB disable eMMC 16GB v4.51
HP Omen; i7-4710QH; 8 GB memory; 256 GB San Disk SSD; Win 8.1
HP Photosmart 7520 AIO
++++++++++++++++++
**Click the Thumbs Up+ to say 'Thanks' and the 'Accept as Solution' if I have solved your problem.**
Intelligence is God given; Wisdom is the sum of our mistakes!
I am not an HP employee.

Why I can't use hand write to write this word "里"?

my question just like my title,
did anyone meet this problem before??

Are you receiving an error message? Try disabling the OCR function and converting your file again: http://forums.adobe.com/docs/DOC-3062

Write off cash discount in lockbox irrespective of the permitted pmnt diff

Hey,
We are in to lockboxes, at times we receive payments including discounts..and as such when the lockbox runs, it creates credit memos on customers for the discount amount, what we want is to write off the discount amount ...I know we can do it in OBA3..but that setting allows me to write off discount only to the maximum of the permitted payment difference... I want to use reason code to write the discount off (as the reason code has a check box through which I can ignore the payemnt diff)....again for this..........we have setting in OBCW.... but I am not able to use it..is there any one who has succesfully used OBCW--> "reason code for clearing payment according to payment advice"..
Thanks

any replies/suggestions

Tax relief - Bad debt write off

Hi all,
For a customer with bad debt, it appears standard practice is to use a journal entry to write the debt off to a "Bad Debt" GL account, and then manually reconcile BP balance to zero.
However, the VAT(consumption tax) for the written off amount will still be showing as owed to the government, and will still appear in the TAX report.
In the UK as in other countries, I assume there is relief on bad debt, so the VAT(consumption tax) needs to be written off as well. The only correct way I can think of doing this at the moment is doing a service type credit note with matching tax code of the original invoice specifying the bad debt GL account. In this way, the VAT will also be reversed.
Can anyone advise what method they use, or if there is a proper methodology to do this?
Thanks,
Raj

Hi Gordon,
Thanks for the reply. So as an example, am I correct in thinking the below is the "correct way" to do a write off (if we wanted to avoid doing journal entries):
AR INVOICE - Item Type
Item A x 1 @GBP100.00
VAT/TAX @GBP17.50
-->
AR CREDIT NOTE - Service Type
Bad Debt Write Off xxxxxxxxxx (GL a/c no) @GBP100.00
VAT/TAX @GBP17.50 (assuming we specify identical tax code)
-->
Internal reconciliation to zero
Thanks,
Raj

Write-on/Write-off Vehicle

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for