Wrong account group selected at the time creation of G/L master record

hi,
At the time creation of depreciation G/L master account , which has been selected as balancesheet account instead of Pand L account , and the transactions have been posted. when i try to change to P and L account in FS00 it says trasactions exist we cannot change. now how should i change to P and L account is there any way to chance of changing into Pand L account .
if not what should i do please let me know.
regards
santhoshkalva

Dear,
Create a new GL (Depreciation) with P and L account then transfer the balance from the existing Balance sheet GL to P&L GL, then try to block or set a deletion flag for the Balance sheet GL.

Similar Messages

Account Group problem at the time of LSMW

Hi I have created following GL accounts group:
101     Fixed Assets
102     Accumulated depreciation
103     Investments
104     Inventories
and others
When i go to FS00, i select from drop down. But in drop down i can see full name (like fixed assets, Accumlated Depreciation, etc) instead of 101, 102.
So i select it and create GL account.
In LSMW also i can see full name and i create the recording.
When all steps are done, i upload my file. In dilsplay step, i can see that only four characters are recognised i.e. FIXE or ACCU.
So while uploading it gives error FIXE does not exists. If i put 101 in GL master file, it gives same error. Please tell me how to solve this problem.
Edited by: Deepak Agrawal on Apr 20, 2010 7:45 PM

Hi,
1) Press ALT-F12    > Select options > Tab Expert > Tick   "Show Keys in all Dropdown lists"
     After relogging you will see the "101"
2) When you see the key the error should be solved. It is probable that your key is actually 0101 which is not the same as 101.
Kind regards

GL account created in wrong account group

Hello I have a GL account created in wrong account group? Some transactions have been posted to this GL account already. How can I reconcile the transaction if I want to create it in the correct account group?
Best Regards
Prabin

Hello,
Create a new GL account, post your future postings to that.
Make a transfer entry from old GL to new GL.
Block the current GL for future postings.
Regards,
Ravi

BOM selection at the time of confirmtion

Dear Experts,
My client has requirement that BOM should be selected at the time of confirmation if there are multiple BOM's are available for the same material.Is it possible ??.
Edited by: manjit_pune on Mar 7, 2012 10:07 AM

Hello Manjit,
As a SAP fucntion, BOM should be selected/exploded at the time of MRP so that SAP would be in position to plan the components accordingly. What the reason or benefit of selecting relevant BOM at the time of confirmation ??
In any case, this function is not possible in standard SAP.
Regards,
Anup

Entering Product Group / Category at the Lead Creation Stage

Hi
Our Client requires to capture the Product Group / Category at the Lead Creation Level.
At the lead creation level the sales engineer is not exactly aware of the product pricely which the customer wants to buy but knew which Product Group / Category the customer is interested in. So is there any way to capture the Product Group / Product Category at the Lead Creation Level.
Regards
Punit Kapoor

1. Use TCode 0VVW for creating a Z Item Usage, say, ZPO1
2. Do an item Cat determination in VOV4, as
Sales Doc type
Item Cat Group
Usage
Item Category
OR -
NORM -
ZPO1 -
TAB
3. Maintain Customer Materials Info Record by using VD51.
In item screen for Cust-Mat combination maintain Item usage
Regards
JP

User Exit at the time of Saving in Vendor Master

Hi,
I am trying to put a check through Enhancement "SAPMF02K" in Vendor Master to make Tax No fields as Mandatory for to some particular Company Code and Account Group.
But the problem is enhancement triggers at the time of saving, so what ever error message check i have implement will trigger at the time of saving the data. Now my requirement is it should trigger to the screen where i need to maintain the fields, instead of the error showing in the last screen ( As user need to check in which screen he/she need to maintain these fileds in the list of screens by going back).
Please reply with the appropriate solution.
Regards,
NSK

Hi Shashi,
Did you check with your functional side. It is possible with configuration.
Regards,
Madhu.

Manual BOM selection at the time of order creation

Dear Experts,
Could you help me to understand if there is any provision to select BOM by user at the time of order creation without the help of production version.Is there any configuration required to make BOM selected manually.
Regards,
Krishna Mohan

Hi karishna,
Please go to T-code OPL8 and in production version use( 1 )Manual selection of production version. Then user can select manually instead of automatic selection.
Regards
Muhammad Umar

Batch selection at the time of GR for Process Order

HI experts,
I have the following problem -
I have got a process order of 51, at the time of order creation I have assigned/created 2 batches for the process order using some development and making use of user field. Now at the time of GR after final confirmation, I want to select the batch number for the required quantity, i.e I want to do the GR for both batches, and I want to select the specific batch from the assigned 2 batches. I am facing a problem that , the GR by default selects the first batch of the order and the batch number field greys out. I am not able to select the second batch if I go for second GR of the same process order.
How can I make the field selectable , such that I can select the required batch at the time of GR.
Regards
A S K

There is a possibility to use batch split- kindly check if you are able to do this
Reg
Dsk

AD ACCOUNT GETTING DISABLED ALL THE TIME

Hi all,
Helpdesk has reported that user account get's disabled all the time & they have to enable it.
What could be the cause of this & how to troubleshoot.

Hi all,
Helpdesk has reported that user account get's disabled all the time & they have to enable it.
What could be the cause of this & how to troubleshoot.
Remove the help-desk access to user objects and see if it gets disabled again or not. :)
If you have third party tools which manage user accounts, review their configuration. FIM for example is one of the tools that has authority to disable/enable the accounts. Also If I had no clue what is going one I would enable auditing on user objects and
filter my security event viewer for user changes to see who is disabling them.
AD DS Auditing Step-by-Step Guide
Mahdi Tehrani |
|
www.mahditehrani.ir
Please click on Propose As Answer or to mark this post as
and helpful for other people.
This posting is provided AS-IS with no warranties, and confers no rights.
How to query members of 'Local Administrators' group in all computers?

Alternative items to be selected at the time of confirmation

I maintain alternative items by using alt group in the bom.But while confirmation of parent material,the material which has the first priority is coming.but if i want to choose different material then what should i do?
first thing:
I dont want to touch bom as user dont have authorization for the same.
second thing:
can it is possible alt materials will be selected on the basis of stock avl in sto loc

I know that on the basis of priority ,i can select the required component for confirmation but please tell me how i can select material on the basis of stock available.because suppose in bom i maintained 110022 material as first prioriry and i want to select 110023 at the time of confirmation .
I know user can change the component 110022 to 110023 on confirmation screen manually .
also if we dont want user to change this manually .
Is there any solution that all alt items will appear on the screen and user can choose as per requirement.

Alternative item selection at the time of confirmation.

Hi, please suggest how to maintain alternative items and also how to choose alt items at the time of confirmation of specific material.

Hi,
Alternative item has to be maintained in respective BOMs.
Give the same item no in the BOM for the alternates.
Double click on one of the alternate item, the header data for the item will appear.
In the basic data Tab, enter the ALTITEM GRP value it can be any number or character.
CLick on the arrow button that will appear after entering the alternate item.
Give the Priority, Strategy & usage probability. BAsed on these values the alternate item is selected during BOM explosion.
The alternate item group value should be same for both the alternate items.
For further details refer
[Alternate Item|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/f4/7d2ba044af11d182b40000e829fbfe/frameset.htm]

House Bank selection at the time of Payment run

Hello All,
At the time of automatic payment program, The user has to select the house bank for the payment irrespective of ranking order maintained in the FBZP. And I dont want to give the house bank in all the line item at the time of posting or reallocate at the time of payment run.
Is there any option to maintain the house bank in a single place before the payment run, so that for that particular payment run picks the house bank.
Hope the question is clear.
Raja.A

Hi,
the user should use the "available amounts" in bank selection and put zero in the bank he doesn't want to use, and put an amount in the bank he wants tu use.
The available amounts may be changed from the F110 transaction, environment menu, maintain config, bank determination.

Batch selection at the time of 543 movement

Hi All,
This is regarding subcontracting process.
Whiles preparing 57f4 challan, we made a 543 movement with specific batch, now while taking GRN for same PO we need to select batch for 543 movement which system shows as FIFO defined in batch search strategy, but user can select any batches out of nos of batches.
We need that system should alllow only those batches which we issued at the time of 541 mvt.
Can anybody suggest?
Thanks
Nilesh M.
Edited by: Nilesh Malvi on Dec 23, 2010 8:21 AM

There is no way to exactly Map 541 batch with 543 batch .
Practically its not possible to determine and point that the 541 batch and 543 batch will be one and the same.
Once you have sent the material to the vendor, it is in his custody, and you cannot control in what order he has consumed the batches. Thats why we use FIFO method.
Only way is to enter the batch in the PO->Components screen itself.
check below thread
Re: Batch Determination - Sub contracting

'completing task' accounts for 90% of the time

I'm running some mappings and they are taking a huge amount of time to complete in OWB. I noted that the execution window is spending most of the time in the 'completing task' state. So I checked and all the rows have been inserted correctly into the target table. I'm talking a couple of seconds to insert the rows and 1+ hours for the task to actually finish within OWB.
Can anybody tell me what's going on here and what I can do, if anything, to make the task 'complete' more quickly?
Thanks
Brian

Actually, you could try following:
-     Open WF Monitor, connect to DB via sqlplus or other tool to prepare to run process.
-     Start mapping execution, verify your session is waiting queue message
-     Wait process to complete, verify it by WF Monitor
-     Check wait state of session if it still in queue message, it waits completion report from runtime platform.
Our current configuration is: OWB 9.2.0.4 + DB 9.2.0.7.
We have faced similar issues with OWF (dont know your environment, but in ours OWF work under heavy load with concurrent executions of different types of processes) session could wait indefinitely long for process to complete while process had finished long time ago.
Unfortunately, this is not the only implication of the issue. Once you could notice that your processes simply hang in active state. Activities within process are notified, but not started.
We took two steps independently and now our situation with OWB/OWF is much better:
- First. In the runtime schema of OWB there are a lot of foreign keys without indexes on child side we created indexes, rebuild them, alter move all tables etc. This came from the recent investigation in this forum about performance of OWB while purging the logs. I suppose the issues that raised in that discussion have their implications on environment with concurrent process executions also.
- Second. I applied 9.2.0.7 Patch Set (plus one one-off-patch) on DB this make OWF behavior to improve dramatically. No notified-but-not-started activities, or indefinite-waiting-for-process-completion sessions noted since New Year. Previously we have to fight these issues every day and even worse.
Serhit.

Creation of new vendor master record

When I assign Account Group, getting following error "Acc. group uses internal no. assignments, leave blank".
if leave blank; asking to enter account group. Can anyone suggest how to select external number assignment while creating a new account group?
Edited by: Kushal Pal on Jun 11, 2011 5:46 PM

Hi Atif,
I have solved the problem myself. we assign external numbers in the customization through SPRO u2013 SAP reference IMG u2013 Finance Accounting u2013 Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable u2013 Vendor Accounts u2013 Master Data u2013 Preparation for Creating Vendor Master Data u2013 Create Number Ranges for Vendor Accounts ans selecting Ext check box as first step.
In the second step, by selecting "Assign Number Ranges to Vendor Account Groups" in the same customization.
Your suggestion was helpful but I had already worked out. XKN1 is the correct Trans. to look into assigned ranges.
Thanks.
Edited by: Kushal Pal on Jun 13, 2011 4:55 AM

Wrong account group selected at the time creation of G/L master record

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for