Wrong BED is flowing to MIRO

Hi
Its related to Indian Excise,
During MIRO Basic Excise Duty calculation is wrong.That is when you click on calculate tax,the tax amount being calculated is entirely diffrent.I noticed Base amout is correct,BED is wrong(For instance 41.05% of BED is showing instead of 16%) and E cess & SHE cess values are according to BED.
I have done following analysis,fyi
1)Tax code entered in MIRO is correct(Both at header & item)
2)Correct tax code is used in PO(16%,2%,1% and 4% VAT)
3)Excise & Tax calculations in PO are correct.
4)Percentages in FTXP are correct(ie 100%,2%,1% and 4%)
5)Percentage in FV12 for BED condition type is 100%.
5)16% is maintained for that chapter id in J1ID.
Can you pls advise,where could be the problem? why the incorrect BED is flowing to MIRO?
Your inputs are highly appreciable & rewardable.
Regds

Hi Rajaram,
thanks for reply.
In J1Id i have maintained Exc rate 16% ,ECS rate 2% and AT1 1%
and below r the cond types used in tax code
JMO1 for BED
JECE - Ecess
JECH -SHE cess
JIP6 for VAT(deductible)
And pls note whatever % maintained for JMO1 in FTXP will appear in FV13,i have not maintained any % seperately in FV11.
pls advise.
regds

Similar Messages

Correct values not flowing in MIRO when values are changed in J1IEX

D/ Friends,
In Purchase Scenario with mov typ 101, when we capture excise duty thru T.Code J1IEX, sometimes we need to change the Duty Rates as well as Excise base Value (i.e.***. Value). We change these 2 things & we also change the BED, ECess & SH Cess values manually. Thereafter we do GRN & then post the EI.
Now the issue is that when we do MIRO, the duties Posted in EI in J1IEX, are not flowing in MIRO. Pls note that such scenario is occurring only when we change the above 2 things in J1IEX. Pls advice.
Rgds.

pl check excise defalt for your tax procedure JCV1 condition assigned or not.
regards
karthik

ADC for Domestic Purchase not flowing in MIRO for particular MIGO Document

Hello Experts,
    We've a scenario in which we pay ADC to domestic vendor. The procedure we follow is as below:
          1. Condition record for JAOP with 0% rate maintained in FV12.
          2. PO created with JMOP 10%, 2% ECS, 1% SECS & 4% VAT.
          3. During MIGO (also excise invoice capture), AED value is maintained
          4. After J1IEX, at the time of MIRO this ADC along with other duties flows in simulation
    Now in my case, there are number of GR documents for which MIRO is performed, but for particular GR, ADC is not flowing in MIRO and also excise duty is incorrect, it's not flowing from GR.
   So what is the probable solution for this, I've already checked MIGO & excise invoice documents & found to be ok.
Thanks in advance
        Amit

Hi,
Have you maintained material price including AED price??
If yes then check whether you have maintained JAX1-100% or not?
I think this should be treated as a dealer purchase as you are maintaining 0% amount for JAOP.
Regards,
Piyush

Baseline date not flowing in MIRO transaction

Hi
Baseline date not flowing in MIRO while doing transaction.
We have maintained Payment terms in vendor master record
and payment terms maintained in PO also.
We have done the GR posting.
please help
Thanks and regards
Aakash

Are you use an MIRO with amount split? and does your payment term is configured with "No Default Date'? Then refer to OSS 495303.

PO Conditions not flowing in MIRO

Hi,
This is a case of Import Purchasing where Invoice Verification (for Custom/CVD) is done before goods receipt.
It is observed that in the screen MIRO the condition values (for duties of Custom/CVD) are not flowing from PO although values are maintained in PO. Amount and quantity need to be entered manually in MIRO in this case.
Is this a standard behaviour of SAP that if IV is done before GR then condition value doesn't flow from PO and need to be entered manually in MIRO? And is there any way out / work around in order to get the condition values flown from PO to MIRO if IV is done before GR?
Can any one assist in getting this query resolved?
Thanks in advance

yes, this is the standard behaviour. In import procurement we need to enter manually the value of conditions.
No, there is no any customization through which we can get the flow of value automatically.
But, u can drag the value and qty of conditions---
when u will do IV against the layout of PLANNED DELIVERY COST, there u will find the right side two columns Recieved QTy and Value. from that columns, u can drag the value and qty.
thanks

Wrong Excise Duty amount in MIRO

Hi Gurus,
I have done MIGO , in which I have captured Excise Duties as BED - 35000.00, 2%ECS- 700.00, 1%S&H Cess - 350.00, but in MIRO it is showing as BED - 35000.00, 2%ECS- 35000.00, 1%S&H Cess - 350.00.
My client is using TAXINJ, we have recently added two condition types as JEC1 for 2% & JAX2 for 1% and assigned to tax Code. In PO , I have maintained the tax rate in J1ID as 1421. In PO Invoice tab Condition Value is shown correctly against as BED (JMO1)- 100%, - 35000.00 , (JEC1) ECS-14% - 700.00 & (JAX2)S&H Cess-1%- 350.00 but in Amount column it shows as BED (JMO1)- 100%, (JEC1) ECS-14% & (JAX2) S&H Cess-1%.
System is taking value as 35000.00 for 2%ECS instead of 700.00
Pl. guide
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Vikas

u have to maintain the JEC1 as 2% in FV11, as per ur query u specified it is 14%.Check.
regards,
BSK

BED not flowing for import po in migo

Dear all,
I am doing import po.while doing migo i am getting the excise tab.in excise BED is not flowing where as Ecess and se cess are flowing.In spro in excise defaults i have maintained cvd condition type JCV1same as in calculation schema.When i am doing normal PO with same vendor and material the values are flowing.Can you please guide me to where to set this.
regards
vithal

Hi,
Check the settings in J1ID and Excise defaults in SPRO.
If all settings are OK,check whether Z0 tax code is mentioned in the Line item of PO in Item detail.
Please check whether u have given the CVD account in Company Code Settings in SPRO
Regards
Edited by: Varaghamurthy Chakravarthy Kannan on May 11, 2009 7:36 AM

BED NOT FLOWING TO EXCISE INVOICE J1IIN

HI SAP GURUS
can anybody help me the bed value is not flowing from invoice to excise invoice ecess,hecess,is coming properly we are using taxinn procedure i checked in excise defaults there it is jexp only i also assigned ett to concern gl accounts and i assigned jexp in classify condition types to zinfac to jexp.one thing is we recently changed taxinn to zaxiin.

IMG->Logistics general->Tax on goodsmovements->India->Basic settings->determination of excise duty->Maintain Excise defaults. Here you maintain your excise condition types.
Check whether you maintain G/L accounts for your transaction types just under excise acoounts for excise transaction.
Regards,
Deepu Pillai

Prob. in Implement User Exit for wrong calculation of Surcharge during MIRO

Dear All,
In our system the calculation of Surcharge is wrong during MIRO.
So i write this issue to the SAP, the below solution is provided by them :
Use the user exit 'J_1I7_USEREXIT_PROCESS_TKOMV' to redetermine
the additional VAT condition type value. This user exit will be
called after the FM 'J_1I4A_TAX_CONDITIONS', where the
redetermination of the VAT will take place on the basis of
the changed excise duties.
So, userexit can be implemented by CMOD and SMOD, but this userexit actually a Function Module.
But now the problem is how can i implement the 'J_1I7_USEREXIT_PROCESS_TKOMV' function Module.
Regards,
Nitin Garg

Dear,
Thanks. I already make a enhacement in this function Module and write the below code:
ENHANCEMENT 1 ZMIRO. "active version
DATA : WA_XKOMV TYPE KOMV.
DATA : WA_KBETR TYPE KOMV-KBETR,
IDX TYPE SY-TABIX.
LOOP AT XKOMV WHERE KSCHL = 'ZSUR'.
IDX = SY-TABIX.
WA_KBETR = XKOMV-KBETR / 10.
READ TABLE XKOMV INTO WA_XKOMV WITH KEY KSCHL = 'JVRD'.
XKOMV-KWERT = WA_XKOMV-KWERT * WA_KBETR / 100.
MODIFY XKOMV INDEX IDX TRANSPORTING KWERT.
ENDLOOP.
ENDENHANCEMENT.
ZSUR is a custom surcharge condition type. But still surcharge is wrong calculated.
Nitin Garg.

Wrong PAyment Term Picked During MIRO

Hello,
I have an issue,
1) I create PO .
2) Then do MIGO and assign DELIVERY NOTE Feild .
3) Then Further I create a MIRO giving DELIVERY NOTE feild as 'PO REFRERNCE' .
NOw During MIRO its picking Wrong PAYMENT TERM.
I checked Vendor master for PAYMENT TERM its maintained properly.
I even checked OBB8 for proper assignment of Payment Terms.
Eg For Vendor -123 Payment Term assigned is '3000'
in PO its picking 3000
but During MIRO it gives Incorrect Value '9000'
Kindly suggest.
Thanks & Regards,

In MRM_PAYMENT_TERM
Payment term feild (ZTERM) is not Export parameter,how can we Use this..
It picks wrong payment term when Delivery note is selected During MIRO for 'PO Reference'
If he uses PO number it gives correct payment term..
Regards,

Wrong BED calcualtion in MIGO

Hello,
In my BED calcualtion, its' adding Rs. 100 in all the cases..
i don't know frm where its adding 100 rs. if any has right ans.pls revert
For ex.
Base price - 1000
BED - 14% - 140
Ed cess 2% - 2.80
Se cess 1% - 1.40... this is the normal flow, where mine is flowed like
blw;
Base price - 1000
BED - 14% - 154
Ed cess 2% - 2.80
Se cess 1% - 1.40

HI Pankaj,
I didn't maintained JEXC in m/08.. i have used tax code and rates are maintained in fv11. . In po, invoice tab, taxes are flowed correctly. The only issue is in migo it's adding Rs. 100 , what ever qty / value if i changed.. pls tell me , what else i need to check
Edited by: Mahesh J on Oct 7, 2008 7:42 AM

Wrong calculation of Tax in miro

Hi Experts,
While positing MIRO i am facing the following error.
The issue now is i maintained a Tax code in FTXP with 10% in IN:A/P LST and tick the Tax calculator in MIRO the tax is calculated with 30%.
Eg: Invoice amount is 10000 for which tax is 10% then tax amount should be 1000 but it displaying as 3000.
Inputs please.
Regards,
Nani.

hi,
plz check in FV12, what is the record maintained there.
regards
jash
Edited by: diptasya jash on Apr 30, 2009 9:25 AM

Wrong accounting entries @ time custom miro

HI expert
I am performing, custom miro for Asset import, when at the time of sumulating i am getting A/C
Custom a/c
To captital consumption
my captital consumption is g/l wich i have use in PO in account assignment tab.
The correct entries hve to
Custom a/c
To CVD clearing a/c
Customs clearing a/c
Regard
Nabil

Hi,
It seems that system is directly trying to book the cost to consumption acct the time of Invoice.
This scenario may happen if there is no goods receipt expected for the Purchase Order.
Can you please check the " GR non valuated " and "Goods receipt" indicators in the purchase Orders.
Rajesh

Automatically different value is flowing in MIRO for custom duty than PO?

HI
Here when I enter some custom condition like clean energy cess value in 50 INR, in MIRO automatically 49.83 INR is getting copied due to the USD condition,
How can you enable only PO values only should be copied to MIRO,
regards,
Archana

Hi
Check your exchange rate in po and in invoice ,if its fix in po you cant change in Miro,if exchange rate not fix in po you can chnage in invoice
also check from FI consultant what exchange rate they have maintain
Regards
Kailas ugale

Wrong G/L account in MIRO

Hi guys,
my problem is this: I have a Purchase Order with only flag 'Invoice receipt' because I don't want good receipt and in accounting label I have a certain G/L account.
Now I run the MIRO but I click the button 'simulate' the system takes correctly the G/l account for the vendor BUT doesn't take the G/L account in the purchase Order but the G/L account 'Accrued Receivers Auto' like if I have done a Good receipt...Why the system takes this acconunt and not the mine in the PO?
thanks in advance bye
Maximilian

Hi,
can you explain the PO type.
like Frame work order or NB doc type.
If framework order.
the you might be given G/L account w r t account assignment key.
check the OBYC what G/L accoiunt assign against the account assignment key--> account modifier.
SAM

Wrong BED is flowing to MIRO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for