Wrong BoM explosion

Hello,
i create a BoM and a Routing for a product. Than i make a allocation for the BoM materials to different steps.
I transfer everything via CIF to APO. In check the PPM everything is fine.
If i create now a production order over APO all components are assign to the first step, when i check the order in R/3.
Why?

Hi,
1) Please run /sapapo/ccr run for production/planned order and check
any error noticed
2) Check the application logs whether any errors?
Regards
R. Senthil Mareeswaran.

Similar Messages

BOM Explosion Number in Sales Order

Hi Experts,
For a make-to-order case, I would like to assign a predefined BOM explosion number with fixed key date to a sales order item. Instead of manually assigning the BOM explosion number to the sales order item, is there any way to let the system automatically assign the BOM explosion number?
As I read from SAP Library under the BOM Explosion Number (Fixed Key Date), it states "The system can automatically specify the BOM explosion number when entering planned independent requirements or customer independent requirements or when entering the sales order." So is there any configuration to be done in advance to enable the BOM explosion number to be automatically assigned to sales order item?
Thanks,
SW

I tried also setting up the material and its BOM determination by specifying only 1 BOM out of multiple BOMs. Still,
1. When I add the said material into sales order line and save the sales order, the BOM explosion number value never appear automatically in the sales order line.
2. When I run the planning on the sales order through MD50, the planned results do not have the BOM explosion number attached.
I think your advice is more applicable to selection of a BOM from multiple BOMs instead of determining the fixed key date based on appropriate BOM explosion number, correct me if I am wrong.
Regards

BOM Explosion problem

Hi,
I have multilevel BOM (almost 10 levels with around 1500 materials), in which many materials repeat at different levels.
I am facing problem in one of the material during MRP, This material is used at 10 different levels. Altogether to produce a FG it requires in 36 numbers. In different levels quantity of it required is different. Say 8,1,4,2 etc but total qty is 36.
When MRP is run the requirement generated for this material is same at all levels i.e 36(total qty) / 10 (BOM levels) = 3.6
But actually system must generate requirements as per BOM quantity. Not sure what is wrong.
Requesting you all to reply quickly for this issue.
Regards,
Pavan

Hi,
Below is the little knowledge i have which want to share with all the august people around.Hope it would be helpful enough for you to get the results.
A BOM is not exploded in the following situations:
- No BOM is effective:
-- On the explosion date and in the given area of validity
For the given effectivity parameters
- The BOM has a deletion indicator.
- The BOM is a multiple BOM, and has no alternative that matches the lot size for your required quantity.
- No BOM matches the selection criteria of the BOM application you selected.
- This is possible in the following situations, for example:
-- The application does not take all BOM usages into account.
For example, the application only takes BOMs that are relevant to production into account, so a BOM that is relevant to sales and distribution is not exploded.
-- The application selects a specific alternative on the explosion date you require. The material master record supports alternative determination by Explosion date.
If the specified alternative is not valid on the explosion date, the BOM is not exploded.
-- The application takes production versions in the material master record into account, but no production version has a BOM that is valid on the explosion date you require. The material master record supports alternative determination by Production version.
The system only explodes the BOM defined for the production version that matches the alternative and/or usage entered on the explosion date required.
-- The application only takes BOMs with certain status indicators into account.
For example, the application for MRP only explodes BOMs that have at least the status Explosion for MRP.
Further checks:
- Do the proper Scheduling in Routing (Backward/forward). In md61 give the requirement in next month.check your in-house production, planned delivery time in md02 give MRP Control parameter Rexplode BOM and Routing.
- Check BOM explosion data in MRP4 view of material master view ( Individual/Coll data).
Please revert with your response
Thanking You in Anticipation
Regards
Chandra

How to restrict other plant material assigned to SA BOM explosion

Dear Experts
One of our client havea issue of assigning wrong material to the scheduling agreement BOM explosion.
Actually there are two different plant code one for manufacturing plant and another one trading.Subcontractor activity will be carried out in trading plant , but users assigning the BOM components from manufacturing plant material.
So they are sending material to vendor from manufacturing plant and receiving material to trading plant.But finance guy don't want do like that.
How to restrict other material (material not part of SA plant)assignment to SA BOM explosion
Thanks in advance
Regards
SS

Thanks for your reply.
In BOM creation CS01 , if plant is differ from header to line item system will give error message M3 351
"Material &&&&&& not maintained in plant &&&&".
Like that i want to make it in ME38 BOM explosion also.If plant is differ from scheduling agreement line item to BOM line item system should give error message.
For the above scenario I need the solution
SS

Discontinued parts in BoM explosion reports

I am having difficulty with the BoM explosion reports (CS11-13, and CSP1-3), in that they seem to take no notice of discontinuation. In particular we have some assemblies which are discontinued, and replaced by alternative parts with a different sub-assembly BoM. It does not seem possible to explode through the new BoM - the reports appear to continue to use the obsolete assembly.
Am I doing something wrong? It would seem clear that the reports should explode the BoM through the new assemblies, particularly if there is no stock of the obsolete part.
Is there an alternative way to get a BoM explosion report which does take note of the discontinuation data?

Hi,
In my opinion discontinuation is considered only during MRP run (planning) and has nothing to do with BOM reports (CS03, CS11, CS12, CSMB, etc).
SAP online help:
If this indicator is set, the material is defined as 'to be discontinued'. The material is then discontinued in MRP. MRP transfers dependent requirements that are no longer covered by stock of this material to the follow-up material.
So, I think you won't see the follow-up material in BOM reports. Even if you maintain the discountinuation in BOM I think you cannot see the actual sitruation in BOM reports (you will see both follow-up and discontinued material).
I hope I'm mistaken and this is a solved issue in SAP.
Regards,
Csaba

Sample steps to setup BOM explosion in MRP

Hi everyone,
I am one of those unlucky folks that can't seem to get a simple BOM with FERT to explode HALB component within in MD02. I have spent two days reading every post about this common issue found over the Internet as far as 2007 and also read the SAP note 13023. I tried every suggestion to troubleshoot without success.
In my environment, I am using a clean IDES with standard SAP configuration, meaning no changes were done on it. As faced by others before, the BOM component just won't explode. I have even blank the days in MRP2 not entirely sure if my way of troubleshooting make sense. For simplicity, I have input a safety stock value to trigger the FERT within MD02.
Rather than I ask the same question again about where it might have gone wrong, may I know if anyone here can send or point me to a sample few steps guide or screenshots for the FERT and HALB MRP1 - 4 views and the BOM itself (1 material with 1 component)? I can then simulate the results using my IDES and move on from there.
Asking in this forum is actually my last attempt. My apologies to forum administrator for posting a request instead of something helpful to the community.
Thanks.
D.B.

Hello DB
The most common cause for a missing BOM explosion is the validity.
On transaction OPPQ, on tab BOM explosion, you can determine which date will be used for the BOM explosion. You should make sure that your BOM is valid on this date. You can try to create your BOM with a validity in the past, in order to guarantee that it will be exploded.
Another common reason is the setting selection method on MRP4. If it is set to 3, the BOM will be only exploded if there is a production version.
BR
Caetano

Wrong BOM version when creating a subcontracting PO

Hello,
I am trying to create a subcontracting PO. First, I enter the material I want to order and the item category for subcontracting (L) in the order item; then I press Enter. However, the screen for component processing is NOT displayed. For this reason, I selected "Material data" and clicked on the "Components" button and BOM is displayed. But, there are two BOM versions for this material and only get one of them (the wrong one). How can I get the right one?
Regards,
Carlos Piana
Functional Leader MM
La Universal
Guayaquil, Ecuador

Hello,
I clicked on "New BOM explosion" but I still get the same BOM explosion. Should I change the master data somewhere?
Carlos

BOM Explosion - R12

Is there any other API for BOM Explosion in R12 other than the one given below?
Bompexpl.Exploder_Userexit
Thanks
Manu

hi Janardhan,
phantom assembly is the assembly which is not kept in stock rather it consumes directly.
Use of phantom assemblies are as below
Phantom assemblies are assemblies that have their own product structure, but whose assembly does not actually physically exist. The components of the phantom assembly are incorporated directly in the superordinate product. The product structure of the superordinate product contains a reference to the phantom assembly.
example - A car with music system.
During backflush, only the goods movement for the phantom assembly components are posted. The phantom assembly is marked as backflushed but does not trigger any goods movement.
Experts pl correct me if i'm wrong.
Regards,
Anil

BOM Explosion - special procurement type 52 (collective order)

In BOM explosion, special procurement type -> collective order (52) for the item is considered as phantom assembly. I wish to know the business reason for this. Any help please ??

hi Janardhan,
phantom assembly is the assembly which is not kept in stock rather it consumes directly.
Use of phantom assemblies are as below
Phantom assemblies are assemblies that have their own product structure, but whose assembly does not actually physically exist. The components of the phantom assembly are incorporated directly in the superordinate product. The product structure of the superordinate product contains a reference to the phantom assembly.
example - A car with music system.
During backflush, only the goods movement for the phantom assembly components are posted. The phantom assembly is marked as backflushed but does not trigger any goods movement.
Experts pl correct me if i'm wrong.
Regards,
Anil

Comp. Backflush using Comp. Scrap(No BOM explosion(manual comp. entry))

Hi Friends,
*Component Backflush + MFBF Functionality:*
Go to MFBF --> Select the radio button COMPONENT BACKFLUSH --> and click on
COMPONENT SCRAP (application toolbar).
Now select the radio button NO BOM EXPLOSION(manual comp. entry).
Enter the Material Number and Production Version.
Now click on PROCESS COMPONENT LIST (application toolbar).
Enter Material, Quantity, UOM, Storage Location, Reason Code and press ENTER.
By default the movement type will be '551'.
Now when you click on SAVE button on the top. It will give you a material
document number.
I have created a new FM according to the standard component backflush functionality and called the BAPI BAPI_REPMANCONF1_CREATE_MTS in my Z FM. But the functionality of the standard BAPI is not giving expected results.
I would appreciate if someone who had gone thru the same situaton could help me. I have done my research in different ways. But ended up finding none. Is there any other BAPI or procedure to achieve the above scenario.
Thanks.

Hi Keshav,
Thanks for getting back to me.
Below is how I populated the data.
"I am not populating Backflush quantity and UOM because according to my
"standard MFBF functionality I have choose NO BOM EXPLOSION(manual comp. entry)
FLAGS-BCKFLTYPE       = '12'.
FLAGS-COMPONENTS_TYPE = '1'.
GENDATA-POSTDATE    = SY-DATUM.
GENDATA-DOCDATE      = SY-DATUM.
GENDATA-MATERIALNR = MATERIAL.
GENDATA-PRODPLANT   = PLANT.
GENDATA-PRODVERSION   = VERSION.
"Z_IMPORT_TABLES is the custom structure which I have declared at TABLES in FM
"I_GOODS is of type BAPI2017_GM_ITEM_CREATE
LOOP AT Z_IMPORT_TABLES.
WA_GOODS-MATERIAL    = Z_IMPORT_TABLES-MATERIAL.
WA_GOODS-PLANT          = Z_IMPORT_TABLES-PLANT.
WA_GOODS-STGE_LOC   = Z_IMPORT_TABLES-STGE_LOC.
WA_GOODS-MOVE_TYPE = Z_IMPORT_TABLES-MOVE_TYPE.
WA_GOODS-ENTRY_QNT = Z_IMPORT_TABLES-ENTRY_QNT.
WA_GOODS-ENTRY_UOM = Z_IMPORT_TABLES-ENTRY_UOM.
WA_GOODS-MOVE_REAS = Z_IMPORT_TABLES-MOVE_REAS.
APPEND WA_GOODS TO I_GOODS.
ENDLOOP.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_REPMANCONF1_CREATE_MTS'
    EXPORTING
      BFLUSHFLAGS       = FLAGS
      BFLUSHDATAGEN = GENDATA
    IMPORTING
      CONFIRMATION   = CONFIRMATION
      RETURN               = RETURN             ---------> error in this parameter
    TABLES
      GOODSMOVEMENTS = I_GOODS.
When I execute this in debug mode, it is giving me an error in my RETURN parameter asking me to enter the backflush quantity and UOM which doesn't suits my scenario.
Appreciate if you could let me know where I am doing wrong in my code and guide me in a better way to achieve this.
Thanks.

Date of BOM Explosion/Routing in the production order

Dear gurus,
i would like have the Date of BOM Explosion/Routing in the production order same the "Basic start date" .
I setting the value 1 = Basic start DATE in the customizing transaction OPPQ and OPPR but the system calculate this date wrong.
Are the the other setting for this necessity ?
Thanks a lot
Daniele
PP TEAM

Dear Toto,
The standard procedure is that the system first checks whether a BOM explosion number exists for the BOM. If one does exist,
the BOM is exploded using the fixed key date contained in the BOM explosion number. If a BOM explosion number does not exist,
the BOM is exploded with the order start date.
Check the setting in OPPQ for BOM explosion.
Regards
S Mangalraj

Multilevel variant configuration without BOM explosion

Hi!
We have the following problem:
We use BOMs with variant configuration in SD and NO BOM explosion. Means, enter the BOM-head material in the SD line, go to the configuration screen and configure the multilevel BOM. There are classes and attributes on every level in the multilevel BOM structure.
After finishing the variant configuration, we save the SD order. If we enter the new SD order again with VA03 and go to the configuration of the SD line, the system forgot every attribute value on levels other than the BOM-head. We see the structure of the selected BOM materials, but no previously entered configuration value on other levels.
Do we make something wrong, or is this a SAP standard "feature" ?
Thanks,
Richard

Hi,
This is a standard feature.The values which you will select for the configurable material,you will not able to see when you got to VA03.
Reward points if helpful.
Regards,
Amrish Purohit

BOM Explosion for Multiple Process Orders

Hi,
I hope someone can assist me with the following: Is there a report I can run or transaction I can do to have BOM explosion for multiple Process Orders? I would like to input process orders for a week and see the BOM details per PO.
Thanks

Dear Sukendar,
1.For this requirement you have to go for a Z report and you can give the Functional Spec's to prepare
this report to your ABAP consultant.Prepare the input format,logic of the program and the output format.
In the logic part you can make use of this Functional Modules's CSAP_MAT_BOM_READ or
CSEP_MAT_BOM_READ or CS_BOM_EXPLOSION or CS_BOM_EXPL_MAT_V2 .
2.Using CEWB helps you to identify all the material that's having the BOM,but here the report does not
shows you the level by level by BOM for a FERT.
Check and revert back.
Regards
Mangalraj.S

BOM Explosion needed on PO and/or Delivery for Stock Transfer PO Process

Good afternoon,
I have been researching the SDN and web for a solution to my problem to no avail so far.
The business problem I need to solve is the requirement for our STPO process to explode certain BOM's that are transfered from one company/plant to another company/plant in order to record batch/serial # component information by the delivering plant on the delivery and verification of the batch/serial # in the receiving plant during MIGO processing of the delivery. This is needed by our Service Mgmt department in order to track servicable items within the Finished Good (medical devices industry).
It appears on the SDN that a BOM can not be exploded on a non-Subcontracting PO (which would be ideal for us), but barring this problem, we are trying to have the BOM explode in the Delivery created from the STPO via the VL10B transaction.
The STPO generates a Delivery doc with type NLCC and item category NLC. I have maintained the material master for the BOM material to have an Item Category Group of ERLA, and I have modified Item Category Determination in configuration in Logistics Execution for deliveries to include ERLA, usage V, and NLC as default item category. But, the deliveries generated from the STPO still do not explode, like what normally happens if the delilvery of the BOM was created from a standard Order.
The components for the BOM need to be displayed on the Delivery (if not the STPO), so the cleark can record the Batch/Serial #'s for each component. Then when the receiving plant posts the Goods Receipt for the delivery a user exit we have (based on movement type and material document code) builds a Service Mgmt table that is then processed to De-install the BOM and components from the former plant and install the BOM and components at the receiving plant (and then subsequently at the ultimate customer's location when a normal sale is made), generating a new Functional Location.
Has anyone here had to do anything like this before? Would any of you have any ideas on how this BOM explosion might work on the PO or Delivery?
Thanks in advance.
Scott.

No responses to this question.
Subject dropped.

BOM Explosion needed on Delivery for Intercompany Stock Transfer Order

Good afternoon,
I have been researching the SDN and web for a solution to my problem to no avail so far.
The business problem I need to solve is the requirement for our STPO process to explode certain BOM's that are transfered from one company/plant to another company/plant in order to record batch/serial # component information by the delivering plant on the delivery and verification of the batch/serial # in the receiving plant during MIGO processing of the delivery. This is needed by our Service Mgmt department in order to track servicable items within the Finished Good (medical devices industry).
It appears on the SDN that a BOM can not be exploded on a non-Subcontracting PO (which would be ideal for us), but barring this problem, we are trying to have the BOM explode in the Delivery created from the STPO via the VL10B transaction.
The STPO generates a Delivery doc with type NLCC and item category NLC. I have maintained the material master for the BOM material to have an Item Category Group of ERLA, and I have modified Item Category Determination in configuration in Logistics Execution for deliveries to include ERLA, usage V, and NLC as default item category. But, the deliveries generated from the STPO still do not explode, like what normally happens if the delilvery of the BOM was created from a standard Order.
The components for the BOM need to be displayed on the Delivery (if not the STPO), so the cleark can record the Batch/Serial #'s for each component. Then when the receiving plant posts the Goods Receipt for the delivery a user exit we have (based on movement type and material document code) builds a Service Mgmt table that is then processed to De-install the BOM and components from the former plant and install the BOM and components at the receiving plant (and then subsequently at the ultimate customer's location when a normal sale is made), generating a new Functional Location.
Has anyone here had to do anything like this before? Would any of you have any ideas on how this BOM explosion might work on the PO or Delivery?
Thanks in advance.
Scott.

No responses to this question.
Subject dropped.

Wrong BoM explosion

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for