Wrong Calculation of Total Cost in Travel management in PR05

Dear Gurus,
We have filled the expense type in PR05 like,
Paid by company -- 3000
Own Exp. -
1000
Other Exp.----
1000
5000.
So the paid by company is 3000 and Reimbursement is 2000. But when I check report in S_AHR_61016401 - General Trip Data/Trip Totals , it is showing total cost as 8000 (showing Reimbursement as 5000 and Paid by company as 3000) which is
wrong . Please guide why it is showing wrong value and what configuration needs to be done for this? Thanks

Hi
I had faced the same problem..
but the problem was in table, you have to debug you expense type e using t-code se16 NOT sm30..
Please do as i have advised in below link.
Re: perdiem Accomodation and Meals in Transferred (w/CO Receiver).
Or do let me know if still founds any discrepancy in calculation.
Regards,
Muhammad Umer

Similar Messages

Travel manager (PR01/PR05)

When entering a trip and saving it the travel manager shows the reimbursement amount of this trip.
When changing the trip the amount is not being updated (resp. shows a wrong amount). How can the recalculation be triggered??? (Simulation of the trips shows right amount)
Note: Travel statistics are active with mode 1 (update on save)
Thx in advance
Seems to be a problem with the wagetypes - we change some wagetypes in a userxit - the travel statistics don't get this
Message was edited by: Jörg Fleischmann

I'm not sure if I get your point but PR05 functions are build on authorizations.
So if the manager should only be able to approve than you can give only this authorizations to the manager. (transaction PFCG)
And for Approval from Manager you should set up a worfklow with a work item - so the manager should only have display rights for PR05.
(Or even better - just use WebDynpro POWL for the manager to approve without a workflow running in the back)
Yes you are able to create a travel request via PR05 - just enter future date.

Wrong Calculation of reimbursement and paid by company in pr05

Dear All,
I make an entry in PR05 like this .. Airfare company paid -- 4000 and own expense -
2000 . So the total travel cost is 6000 , out of which 2000 is reimbursement part and 4000 is company paid . But the problem is it is showing all 6000 as reimbursement which is not correct . In configuration the airfare company paid is attached with company paid, so I am unable to trace the error. Please suggest.

Hi,
Please check your particular expense type using se16 table T706B1.. Specially parameterPaid by Company that must be X
Please also check other expenses with se16 NOT SM30
Regards,
Muhammad Umer

Travel Management- limiting the travel distance

Hello everyone,
Can you advise me the procedure for showing a pop-up message, when an employee enters the distance traveled as more than 500miles while creating an expenses report. We want to limit the travel distance by 500miles. Thanks a lot for your help
I would appreciate your help.
Kind Regards,
Gopal.

Hi Samba,
Thanks a lot for your reply. I am a bit new to this travel management. Could you just explain me about the "maintaining the DEFINE FLAT RATE FOR THE TRAVEL COSTS" in travel management. I have tried to find out this, but was not successful. I would appreciate your help. It seems like, it is a very easy way of solving the issue. But I am not able to locate the place where I can do that changes.
Thanks a lot,
Kind Regards,
Gopal.

Problem with Per diem calculation in Travel Management module

Dear ALL,
We have configured Travel Management module in SAP and we have an issue with per diem calculation, viz., whenever we add an additional destination in the trip (T.code TRIP).
Ex: Employee's travel plan from 10/8/2011 (06.00 hrs) to 13/8/2011 (06:00 hrs)... in 24 hrs format. When the employee goes directly to one destination and coming back, the per diem calc is coming right. i.e., per diem amount for 3 days.
But when we add additional destination between the trip period- viz., either 10th eve (18.00 hrs) or on 11th Aug- the per diem calc is being done by system for 4 days instead of 3 days only.
In otherwords, for every additional destination in the itinerary, one extra per diem is being calculated (when we simulate in T.Code: PR05)
Would appreciate guidance ASAP.
Regards,
Santosh

hello,
I am having similar kind of problem can you please share your solution
Regards
Sarthak Arora

ESS: Travel Management Cross Company Cost Assignment

Hi All,
We have one scenario in (ESS) Travel Management.
While raising travel request, employee is having the option of selecting Cost Assignment
where in employee selects WBS Element and Cost Center.
Here in we have two company codes
1. 1000
2. 999
Now employee belonging to company code 1000 should have option to select WBS of company code 999.
Currently system is throwing error
The CO account assignment object belongs to company code 999, not 1000
Now if we change this error message to warning message it will impact on all other
applications running in R/3.
This requirement is only limited to Travel Management.
This application uses following webdynpro application,
FITV_VC_COST_ASSIGNMENT
Please provide the appropriate solution either technical or functional.

System will follow the strict rules while posting transactions to cost objects by the employees.
The user is authorized to post only in 1000 but not in 999. so he can't post to 999.
People with authorization to post to 999 can do it.
But the main thing is, Cost centers are belongs to only one company code so U can't post this transaction to 999.
The transaction which u r trying is seems to be cross company code transaction. Cost objects should relate to the company code where U r posting transaction otherwise u cont post it.
IF possible provide more details.....

Specific Identification Cost for batch managed items (Follow-Up from P2P)

Specific Identification Cost method is used for serial and batch managed item. Using this method, the outbound cost of such items would be the original cost of specific goods, which can be determined according to the serial or batch number of that item.
Business One allows the user to receive batch managed items with a batch number that already exists in the DB. Its possible that the received quantity is added to on-hand quantity in the warehouse. In such case, the quantity on-hand of that batch and the received quantity may have different costs.
What should be the system behavior in such case:
1. Block receipts to the same batch with different costs.
2. Write the difference to a price difference account, as done in Standard Cost method.
3. Manage the batch cost with Moving Average method.
This thread is continuation from 'Specific Identification Cost for batch managed Items' <a href="http://p2p.sap.com/businessoneforum?type=join&login=1&uid=41FB661A76CED536C825C4E2B6FF4397&cid=91&go=z37225">discussion</a> in P2P SAP Business One Forum (Product Development Collaboration).
Previous discussion on P2P is summarized in the attached file.

Hi Peter,
This is a very important functionality that you are describing here. For example, in the Steel industry, it could be extremely useful to cost by batch or serial number.
If you receive a batch that already exists in the system and if the costing method for the product is moving average, then teh cost of the batch should be calculated based on the moving average as well.
If the costing method is standard, then the cost should go in a variance account.
If the costing method is FIFO, then it is a getting trickier...
Regards,
Vincent

SSRS 2008 have 2 colums with amount needs to add Total cost and than total cost column divide by Total qty get avg

SSRS 2008, have this report
Qty Column --------- Est cost column -----    Mark up Cost Column -   Did add Total cost column
4 pcs-                       $ 2000.00 --------------$ 50.00 --------------- $ 2050.00
Avg Cost
$2050/4= 512.50
how to write this exp to get value $ 512.50
what I did , its not giving me correct result,
=Sum(Fields!estCOSTAMOUNT.Value+Fields!COSTMARKUP.Value)/(Fields!QTY.Value)
can some one please advise what I am doing wrong.
thanks in advance

I tried both exp, did not work
may be I was not clear in the question
Qty Column --------- Est cost column -----    Mark up Cost Column -   Did add Total cost column
4 pcs-                       $ 2000.00 --------------$ 50.00 --------------- $ 2050.00
2 pcs ------------------$ 1500.00  --------------=$100.00 ----------------$1600.00
Total   qty 6 pcs-----$ 3500.00------------------$150.00---------------$ 3650.00
Avg Cost
$3650..00/6= 608.33
my field name
=Sum(Fields!COSTAMOUNT.Value) + want to add cost amount and Mark up and divide with qty total
=Sum(Fields!COSTMARKUP.Value)
=Sum(Fields!QTY.Value)
please help how can I write it to get the result

FM Travel Management Integration Deactivating

Hi All,
How to deactive the integration of Travel Managment with Funds Management module, since we are controlling the expenses from HR module.
After activating funds management in the system, while creating a travel request we got the following error. Anyone can help on this, for idenifying the problem.
In the travel request portal we are getting this error :
" com.sap.tc.webdynpro.modelimpl.dynamicrfc.WDDynamicRFCExecuteException: No expense type for estimated costs has been defined. Cannot save , error key: RFC_ERROR_SYSTEM_FAILURE and No expense type for estimated costs has been defined. Cannot save , error key: RFC_ERROR_SYSTEM_FAILURE "
Thanks
RK

Hi,
Check your patch level n upgarde it.
Please implement the note correction of the note 1286257. This should solve the issue you describe.
Thanks
Neha

How to find out the total cost of a specific VM

I've downloaded the usage statistics file from billing section and I could see the data categorized by different type of resources consumed by a virtual machine. Eg.
Name ResourceGuid
Unit Consumed
"Virtual Machines" "1b4d8861-8cbc-40c8-88f9-e1b78509c3be"
"GB" 0.000158
"Networking" "9995d93a-7d35-4d3f-9c69-7a7fea447ef4"
"Hours" 11.100002
"Data Management" "964c283a-83a3-4dd4-8baf-59511998fe8b"
"10,000s" 6.8899
"Storage" "0e9d0c9b-ab6d-4312-9c7e-3794e22af9c4"
"GB" 0.436496
I'm looking for a way to retrieve the ResourceGuid of all the resources linked to a particular VM, to find out the total cost of it (VM + Networking + Data Management + Storage)
Is it possible through Service Management API? Or any other means?

Hi,
This issue is related with billing, I would suggest you contact with azure support:
http://www.windowsazure.com/en-us/support/contact/, it is the best choice for you. I find a releated voice, it discusses to display the total fee before created service, here is the link: http://feedback.azure.com/forums/170030-billing/suggestions/6478992-display-total-fee,
please vote it.
Best Regards,
Jambor
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

VPRS cost and batch management

Hi Gurus,
Is there any link between the cost and batch management? Currently users has posted a billing document and the cost is 0. The VPRS value in the SO is correctly but it is not brought to the billing document.
We have tested and it seems that this is because the batch management checkbox is not checked in material master, so the VPRS is not generated in billing.
Please advise. Thanks.
Regards,
FY

Hi Javier,
what do you do with the VPRS in your calculation- system ?
If you need i, you delete the requirement 004 in your calculation -system.
on the other hand, you can change TANN to komp-evrwr (price determination on the item category) is 'X'. Then you have to add an 100% rabate for TANN and the resukt will be free good.
Hans

Condition value of Tax gets wrongly added to Total value of Contract

Hi All,
I'm currently investigating an issue where there are 2 line items in an SAP Sales Contract. There is a human error in the second line where the billing end date is less than billing start date in the billing plan. Consequently, the second line has null Outgoing target value.
However, the header Total value in the Contract gets wrongly calculated as Basic condition value of 1st line + Condition value of tax condition type of line one due to this. When I modify the billing end date for the second line item to be a date greater than the billing start date, the above problem disappears and the total value of the contract does not include the tax component.
For eg.
Normal Error free Contract
Total Value at Header = 700.00 EUR
Material Outgoing Target val
Item 0010 MAT1 450.00 ( 450 + 50 (tax ) )
Item 0020 MAT2 150.00
Contract with billing plan error in second line
Total value at Header = 550.00 EUR
MAterial Outgoing target val
Item 0010 MAT1 450.00 ( 450 + 50 (tax ) )
Item 0020 MAT2 0.00
Any inputs would be most welcome.
Regards,
Venkatesh.

Got the solution by making the condition type as manual.
Thanks.
Dhruba

Employee as a Vendor in Travel Management

Hi Experts,
Please guide me about Employee as Vendor in Travel Management?
Do we need to make employee as vendor for Reimbursement Payments.

Thanks Cheyu..
I am putting up my Understanding please correct me if i am wrong.This process is followed for Payment of Reimbusrsement amount to FI.
Employee has taken advance & his actual expenses are beyond advance amount taken.
First employee as a Vendor to be created BY HR Administrator.
HR Administrator will create a Posting Run PRFI to create posting run( Do i need to create wagetypes for this)
Transaction PRRW to create posting in FI- Activiity is done by HR Admin
FI documents are created, there is a debt on supplier account so it must be paid. Payment is done by transaction F110 by FI guys.- This carried out by FI Admin.
I believe this is the Process for Payment by FI to Employees
Please guide.

Thinking about the total cost of ownership (TCO) of BI?

Hi there,
I lead the survey research conducted by Aberdeen Group. We are conducting a survey right now that will reveal your peers insights and experiences (and yours, if you participate) regarding managing the total cost of ownership of BI. I ask two things: 1) Take the survey - it only takes 10-12 minutes and you'll get a free copy of the report when it publishes... the link to the survey is here: http://tiny.cc/KF3hR 2) Let me know what you think fo the survey. Does it get at the major issues regarding TCO of BI?
Thanks!

My thoughts:
1) Oracle ERP (or any ERP) typically replaces numerous applications. Each of those applications needed separate licensing fees, separate support mechanism, and separate employees in your organization to support them. By consolidating into one, it is easier to support it.
2) Normally, Oracle ERP is cheaper than SAP but it certainly not the cheapest ERP in the market. There are some smaller ERPs which are cheaper but may not offer the breadth that Oracle offers. In fact, Oracle offers a small business ERP that is quite cheaper than EBS.
Sandeep Gandhi

Travel Management - Updating Galileo

When our travel agent makes the booking in Galileo, the booking is pulled into SAP Travel Management (using the standard transaction GALILEO_SYNCH). A user (in SAP) will then assign a Cost Centre and WBS element to the SAP booking. Our requirement is for this to be passed back to Galileo in the PNR Remarks table.
If the booking was made directly in SAP, the cost centre etc. are being passed to Galileo via the use of a BADI, but this BADI is only called on create.
Is there anyway to update the Galileo PNR remarks once they have been created?
Weve found the Function Module TP_1G_REMARKS, which looks like it should update the remarks, but as it does not pass the Variant (or record locator), were not sure how it knows which booking to update.
Is there any documentation available on how to use these function modules?
FYI.
Were currently using Function Module TP_1G_DIRECT_ENTRY in the BADI to create the remarks, but not sure whether this should be used on change.
Thanks
Trevor

Just Check
In SPRO
Travel Management-> ESS -> interface configuration.. ->schema and single field ->Trip Prov. Variant = 40 (India Scenario)
Regards,
Umesh

Wrong Calculation of Total Cost in Travel management in PR05

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for