Wrong choice for a monitor?

Hi... just bought a samsung lcd tv monitor to hook up to my macbook pro, but I can't get good resolution for graphic design. selected highest res possible in s system preferences, but still sucky. Is it not a good choice for a graphics monitor?

TV monitors are usually never good for graphic design because they are designed to be viewed from across the room where the pixels merge when being viewed for a distance. So they tend to have bigger pixels and spaced more apart than computer monitors.
Up close requires a higher pixel count per sq inch. So a 17" MacBook Pro has a like 1080i screen up close within a couple of feet as a 50" HD TV has the same at 20 feet.
Since TV content is max at 1080i for 1980 x 1000 pixel count, there is no need to make it bigger for up close and computer use.
Graphic monitors of that larger caliper have something like 3000 x 2000 pixel resolution at 30 and 40" sizes to get the fine detail and less blurry type and images.
If your looking for a larger screen for graphic design, I don't recommend Apple's glossy screens at all, look for a professional anti-glare high res models online.
Apple has been slowly exiting certain markets that depended upon it's hardware in favor of serving only the consumer markets for gizmos.
I fully expect the MacPro to go the way of the XServer in the coming years as demand slacks off for their "Pro" products.
Apple is already introducing only integrated graphics in their "Pro" line of laptops and ineffective for serious professional use glossy displays.

Similar Messages

6d wrong choice for portrait work?

Ok guys,
I was debating for quite some time whether to by the 6d or the 70d. Then I debated the 6d vs 5dIII. I went with the 6d based on many reviews, opinins and some great help on this forum. I haven't really had the chance to put it through it's paces yet. I really hate reading manuals, so I bought this short Creative Live class the John Greengo held on the 6d. He was saying that hardly anyone would use this camera in the studio since you have to run it at 1/100 to get a decent sync speed. This makes me nauseous. This was the main reason I bought this camera was for studio portraits. Does anyone have any encouraging words to make me feel like I made the wrong choice? I definitgely want a full frame, so if this isn't the one, I would have to spend twice as much on the 5dIII.

I should add... once upon a time nearly every camera that I worked with for studio photography... had a flash sync speed of 1/60th, there was no such thing as "high speed sync", and this really was no problem at all. It's not like we felt we needed to overcome a weakness in the camera to do studio shooting.
As Skirball points out, I do not think you'll have any trouble at all at 1/160th.
Tim Campbell
5D II, 5D III, 60Da

Thinkpad T410s - Is the 32-bit a wrong choice for me?

Hi everyone,
I have ordered T410s (2901CTO) with 4GB (2DIMM) and 32-bit Win7. My current concern is about running SAS (Statistical Analysis System) - a statistical and data management software application - that I use to process huge data sets (at least 5GB each). Is the choice of 32-bit a bad choice, because I will not be able to take full advantage of memory upgrades if I want later on.
Say if I buy 8GB for the memory upgrades, then it's only a waster of $$$ as the 32-bit system can only see it but cannot access it. Is that really the case? What is the solution for me now besides returning it and placing a new order for the 64-bit?
Another question is, How can I determine the year/month of release for this model T410s 2901CTO? I've been trying to find it out on the net and I still haven't been able to find any information.
Thanks so much for helping!

Hi pantera,
You can order 64-bit version from lenovo without returning your system:- http://www-307.ibm.com/pc/support/site.wss/document.do?sitestyle=lenovo&lndocid=MIGR-74752
T410s was introduced in the beginning of 2010, if you're looking for the manufacturing date of your system then you can find it on the back sticker, it reads in this format Year/Month (e.g. 09/12).
Hope this helps.
Maliha (I don't work for lenovo)
ThinkPads:- T400[Win 7], T60[Win 7], IBM 240[Win XP]
IdeaPad: U350
Apple:- Macbook Air [Snow Leopard]
Did someone help you today? Compliment them with a Kudos!
Was your question answered today? Mark it as an Accepted Solution!
Lenovo Deutsche Community Lenovo Comunidad en Español
Visit my YouTube Channel

[BSPWM] Issues with my windows being the wrong shape for my monitor.

I wasn't sure what to name this, but I guess that doesn't matter.
Simple backstory: I'm running arch on my laptop. I used to run a dual monitor setup (my laptop's screen and an external monitor); however, as of a little while ago, the laptop's screen broke, leaving me to use the external monitor only.
The issue is that, in bspwm, the windows that are made are for the size and shape of the laptop's monitor... not the external monitor.
(As you can see here.[That is just a screenshot of what happens when I press the shortcut to pull up my terminal])
To set the external monitor as the monitor shown and used I use xrandr with this in my xinitrc:
xrandr --output HDMI1 --off --output LVDS1 --off --output DP2 --off --output DP1 --off --output --primary VGA1 --mode 1280x1024 --pos 0x0 --rotate normal &
If there is anything else you need to know, tell me... I'm not exactly sure what the issue is here, but I'm really hoping someone here does.

This:
bspc config remove_disabled_monitor true
might help.

Solid state drive= wrong choice for the newmacbookpro 2010?

Hi
i've been exchanging on the logic pro forum about the ssd vs the hdd serial to configure a macbook pro for logic.
I would love to hear your point of view or experience about that .
also since it's the apple forum i hope there should be some advice from technician from apple.
since from logic pro forum i had the point of view of logic pro certified level 1 and 2
here is the links :
http://www.logicprohelp.com/viewtopic.php?t=57664
http://www.logicprohelp.com/viewtopic.php?t=55058&highlight=solid+state
thanks a lot for any comments or experiences.
june

but why is it bad to record internally today
I didn't say it was "bad" as such, I said I'd only do it when necessary (and I do) but I'd generally still record to external drives where possible.
imagine you're having a 500 GB internally you can still back up on a other drive after.
is there any consequence about that kind of configuration?
The thing is, the internal drive is the system drive, so it has all kinds of drive activity going on in addition to audio - swap file reading and writing, loading apps, utilities, logging functions and many more.
i heard about the lifetime too but more from some experience from 2009 but i don't know what
happen with the new model if they upgrade their ssd in anyway?
Time will tell I guess, these technologies are new and unproven over enough time yet.

URGENT: Monitor choice for New G5s (Nov 2005)

Sorry bout the "Urgent" but I need to decide on following before purchasing new G5 (Quad or Dual-Core 2.3) and Apple Monitors only have 3 year warranty if purchased with the computer.
SITUATION:
I plan to go with either the default NVidia Geforce 6600 or the NVidia 7800GT(+$350) * Both cards (PCI Express models) - only have DVI ports (1 single link, 1 dual).
--I am truly baffled at how this (DVI vs VGA) affects both features and screen image)
MY CONCERNS: (please consider these in your answers)
* Text:I stare at text for the better part of the day so Sharp Text is VITAL.
* Color: Good color (proper balance consistency & controls) but most important: Monitor to printer translation so a good color profile counts, (most of my final output via ID to local Phaser6250.)
* Compatibility: ie will I be able to take advantage of advertised features via DVI
*Lastly: I don't give a hoot about gaming, DVD playback not a big concern. I want a monitor functions well for running computer applications. Stuff like USB ports and media readers nice but not deal breakers...
SUMMARY OF ISSUES
In most ways, the HP & Dell models sound preferable (feature wise). BUT:
* Will I have the same controls & adjustments (brightness, contrast etc) available for these, (specifically since I'll be connecting via a DVI port) THIS IS VITAL. (but..don't care about Portrait mode)
* Will image/text look as good on a Mac as a PC?
* I assume there will never be Mac drivers for either of these, spooked that this will limit functions and/or could cause compatibility issues in the future.
How would I get color profiles for these?
MONITORS BEING CONSIDERED
As i can find no good advice on CRTs I've pretty much narrowed my choice to following 23" LCD's (all priced similarly $1200-1300):
Following info from misc sources (of varying in reliability) the Web, sources but specs correct.
1) Apple HD Cinema 23":(often compared poorly to Dell, but users seem to love) 25.6 dot pitch
Pros: Can count on compatibility: Firewire ports, aluminum bevel
Cons: Color issues: I hear there's a pinkish tint around edges, and generrally uneven color across the screen., greenish tint in greys. If my printouts match the screen I can live with this. **DVI ONLY
2) Dell 2405FPW: (a lotta buzz on the net, good reviews) 27 dotpitch
Pros: Better outputs: (DVI, VGA, Composite, S-Video, component video), better contrast),
Tilt, turn, Raise. (not a deal breaker)
Cons: Compatibility?. I heard this screen runs too bright even with adjustment (at least on a Mac), large dot pitch, questionable support
3) HP L2335: (editors choice MacWorld Jan 2006) .258 dot pitch
Pros: Better outputs: (DVI, VGA, Composite, S-Video, component video), better contrast)
Programmable user modes (have this on my current monitor - really nice), Tilt, swivel, Raise.
Cons: Compatibility?. questionable support, (supposed to be pretty ugly, but don't about this.
FINAL QUESTIONS:
Has anyone worked with 1 or more of these monitors ON a Mac via DVI? --comments?
Since there's no way to view PC Monitors under these circumstances...
* Can anyone comment on what questions I'd need answered to determine compatibility/feature function ability (via Mac DVI)?
* Am I being paranoid about my using PC Monitor concerns. (my greatest being, that if things poor out of box will get little to no help from manufacturers).
Sorry so long, trying to be clear, THANKS IN ADVANCE- Xandra
PMac Quicksilver, PBook G4 Titanium, iMacDV SE Mac OS X (10.3.8)
PMac Quicksilver, PBook G4 Titanium, iMacDV SE Mac OS X (10.3.8)

I recently purchased the 2405FPW in Canada for $900 CAD (in fact its still on sale) with free shipping. I can highly recommend it. It is certainly not too bright. I have zero dead pixels and am actually surprisingly impressed. Video playback was better than expected and reading Text is very easy at its optimal resolution of 1900x1200.
That being said, is 1900x1200 TOO sharp/small? The monitors performance does vary based on its resolution. The colour is also quite good. Not too oversaturated as with many LCD's (or washed out for that matter).
I suggest you familarize yourself with Colour Calibration Tool (go to Display Properties, Color Calibrate...)
The other big factor for me is the Component Video In that I am using to hook up a High Def signal (yes this is a capable HD TV). Don't kid yourself this is an excellent feature.
In regards to your concerns you can do ALOT of alteration of the LCD via the OSD (the on screen display). But you should make sure to setup ANY LCD via color calibration tool.
Images and text look better on a Mac than a PC in my opinion due to the nature of Quartz Extreme and Quartz font smoothing (your video cards will be excellent at utilizing these features).
In regards to drivers, NIETHER need it. You plug it in (I've used both) and the OS will automatically switch to the default resolution and the default color profile is installed (I tweaked the color profile a little via the color calibration tool...). Yes its true plug and play.
I've never used the HP but I own the Dell. I've tried the Apple. Personally, the Apple looks better physically (but you say you don't care) and it does have a smaller dot pitch (I couldn't notice a big diff and I saw them side be side). The Dell is brighter (you can turn it up or down to your preference) and has better contrast. I LOVE the component in on the dell and have a HD game system hooked up and it looks marvelous.
I also found the Dell more adjustable. Both the dell and the apple are excellent monitors and you can't go wrong. For me the addition of Component in for HD as well as a significant price difference (almost $800 CAD when taxes are added up, heck I could almost buy 2 dell for the price of 1 apple) made me buy the dell and so far I am very happy with it (although I now have to turn my head to game :D)

Ihave downloaded iCloud to my new PC and am using windows 7 and office 2010. I cannot get iCloud to come up on Outlook with the choices for CalendCar and contacrts, my iMail account is there, but not the general coud choices. What am I doing wrong.

I have downloaded iCloud to my new PC and am using Windows 7 and Offie 2010. I cannot get iCloud to come up on Outlook with the choices for Calendar and Contacts, my iMail accnt is there***.me.com, but not the general Cloud choices for calendar and contacts? What am I doing wrong?

I have I cloud 2.0.2.187 loaded just downloaded yesterday.

Windows 8.1 forgets dpi / display size settings for one monitor on almost every reboot

I use TV 32" with 1920x1080 and cintiq 13" with 1920x1080
when I boot my PC the resolution is fine but DPI is wrong.
In smaller monitor It's look like DPI is higher than the bigger one.
I already set dpi to be the same (smallest 100%) but it's not work until I do something to change display setting.
It's really annoy me. This problem is not happen when I use windows 8
Only solution I found is turn off
"Turn on fast start-up".
When I do that It's boot like what I want. every monitor is the same DPI.
But it'll make my boot time longer.
It should be just start up windows and use the same dpi from the start.
So I think this problem is a bug in windows 8.1
Best regards

Thank you for reply.
I've already used the latest graphic card driver. But It's won't help this issue.
In registry editor. I check those variables then value of them is already set like that blog suggest.
So , it look like when windows start-up(with fast start-up) It use something like
suggest value for different monitor size instead of what I set in control panel. But when I turn off fast start-up windows use my setting value.
And I think there are a lot of people who got the same problem as me.
Here is an example.
http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows8_1-desktop/windows-81-forgets-dpi-display-size-settings-for/385cb615-d699-47f8-8c12-717e3364c866

What is the best Mac choice for creating pro-level art/graphics/animation?

I'm an artist who does a lot of work with Adobe Creative Suite CS5, as well as some video editing and lots of animation. I've been using a 2007 model 15-inch Macbook Pro for the last 4 years, and it seems like it's time to upgrade...it runs burning hot all the time, and the battery dies pretty quick when the cord falls out. It seems like the whole thing is running a little slow, which is probably because I have a TON of graphics/animation/video software on there, but I need each and every program.
My question is, what is the best new Mac to purchase to replace this one? I want to make sure it lasts as long as possible, and will be able to handle the programs I use now. My first thought is to get another Macbook Pro, because of the portability, and just add on all the higher RAM, etc to customize it. But my husband suggested looking into the Mac Mini, because it's a lot cheaper, and we're a little strapped for cash at the moment. Would that serve the purpose? Or is a Macbook Pro really the best choice for what I need it to do?
I'd love to hear suggestions from other artists or graphics people. What do you recommend?

For a "cash strapped" person, unless you already
have a monitor, one of the new iMacs may be
a better choice. If you do have a monitor, I would
suggest the dual core i7 equipt MacMini. Since you state
you are using CS5 stuff, most Adobe apps,
Photoshop for example, do not make effective
use of multiple cores. Also, using any of the
Adobe products, regardless of which computer
you decide on, get as much RAM as you can afford.

Colour profiles within PS are off for one monitor only?

Hi guys,
I'm having a very strange issue with colour management in Photoshop CS2 currently.
Photoshop seems to be calibrating all documents in a strange way on only *one* monitor. If I drag the file across to the other monitor the colour is completely different.
Of course it sounds like my monitors being off, however when dragging the file across monitors Photoshop slowly updates the colours for the next monitor. You can see it display the wrong colour at first, then correct it (hopefully that makes sense).
Another symptom of it is when I go to 'save for web'. Here, the colours revert to what I believe are correct.
b It's worth noting that this has only started to happen since some Windows updates. One being an option update from Dell for my monitor - I can't seem to find any information about it though!
My tester that I've been using is a plain white to black gradient. What I'm seeing is a lot of cyan in the middle of the gradient. I've saved off an example:
http://2dforever.com/photoshop.png
As you can see, all the greys are very green, but if you look at the gradient tool in the toolbar itself, the grey appears fine.
I'm unsure how I can adjust the colour profile from Photoshop for one monitor - am I missing something really obvious here?
Just to note: I'm on Win Xp SP2, Photoshop CS2, and I've cleared the preferences.

Since you only mention Photoshop as having a problem, this is almost
certainly, as you suspect, a monitor profile config problem.
Color profiles for individual monitors are configured in
Start>Settings>Control Panel>Display>Settings>(Advanced Button)>Color
Management.
In Settings, click on the monitor whose profile you want to verify before
clicking on the "Advanced..." button. I would start by adding and
defaulting the profile for the monitor that is causing problems.
The Microsoft XP color control panel applet makes setup easier, though it
is not really necessary. If the link below fails, google for keywords
Microsoft XP color control panel applet.
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=1e33dca0-7721-43ca-9174-7f8d429fb b9e&displaylang=en

Looking for a monitor

I am looking for a monitor to use with Aperture and Final Cut. Maybe 22 or 24 inch. I am not ready to spring for an Apple Cinema Display, so what is out there?
Any good websites with reviews or recommendations for the forum ?

Kirby Krieger wrote:
What's your budget? Seriously -- no reason to make recommendations of specific monitors without knowing how much you expect to spend.
Very strongly suggest including hardware calibration along with the monitor purchase. A lot of monitors are good, some are superb, none are reliable without hardware calibration.
I use NEC monitors and a ColorMunki Photo photospectrometer, and am happy to recommend each.
Kirby,
I would like to stay under $800 and it is looking like that might be a realistic budget for a decent 22 - 24 inch monitor.
I agree with your point about calibration. When I visit my son in Pa I use his calibration hardware on my 17"MBP. So I will be getting my own system to keep things correct.
In the reviews I have read NEC has had some very favorable models. I have seen some very low cost monitors that are reported to have great specs around color and the other important parameters but they tend to have limited input choices and I am not sure about the long term reliability of these. I typically lean toward name brands, like NEC , that have a proven track record.

Looking for a monitor that will match the picture quality on my Macbook Pro.

Today i bought a 27" LED Monitor w/ 2560 X 1440 resolution. The specs on the box seemed to match that of a thunderbolt display yet when connected (via HDMI) the picture quality was significantly lower than that of my Macbook Pro (13.3" 2.9 Ghz July 2012). Im likely to return this monitor due to the poor quality. What i want to know is what kind of monitor is out there that will match the color and quality of my macbook pro. I am willing to lose monitor size in return for this quality but i dont want to spend $1,000 on a thunderbolt display (i spent $400 on this monitor). Any one out the with monitor knowledge to help me out in my purchasing decision?

For anyone out there with a similar problem, after a few days of researching the issue i've found a solution. The problem being that HDMI cables wont support resolution higher than 1080p (1920 x 1080) therefore using an HDMI connection, your monitor wont output to its full potential (that is ofcourse if it can support higher than 1920 x 1080). The solution is to use a DisplayPort connection. DisplayPort is the best connection for computer monitors because it can output higher resolutions than hdmi and in most cases DVI. Today it seems like everyone is using HDMI to connect everything and it has become the standard. In the case of TV/Cable HDMI is probably your best choice because it is more properly formatted for that type of display but if you want the best picture quality for computer monitors, i'd stick with a DisplayPort cable. For compatibility with your Macbook Pro/Air/iMac, you do need to buy a MiniDisplayPort to DisplayPort converter cable to make the connection.
Again this is just how to output a non-apple display to your apple computer. If you can afford them, the ThunderBolt and Apple Cinema displays are both great monitors that can output some really high quality picture as well.

Is Keynote a good choice for this kind of video presentation?

Can Keynote easily be set up and used for the presenter to work from a slide table mode with both names (as well as numbers) and good-size customizable thumbnails of the visual material, primarily videos, which can be clicked on so as to play for the audience, on a projector (second monitor), each clip? This would allow nonlinear access to the videos, and spur-of-the-moment changes of order. I would use Final Cut Pro for the presentations, but this will not be available in many venues. I understand the current iMovie does not have a timeline, so it will be less than ideal. Is Keynote a good choice for this? If not, what would be?

I have I work 09 (newest version 5.0.2) and the presenter window only shows the next slide.
I have never had a need for a multi-slide view, because my presentations are all developed for education and are in a pre-determined order.
I can clearly see that this "pick a slide" feature could be quite useful when engaged in a conversational presentation rather than a seminar or classroom format that I use.
To change the order you would have to flip from multi-slide or disengage the program and choose a slide from the builder/creator menu. (Basically stop the presentation and that could be awkward)
If I am missing something, someone pipe in, I opened a presentation and was only able to get "next slide" up on the presenter menu.

Digital Video Interfaces?? Is AJA the best choice for the money??

I am using FCP HD, and have always worked with Mini DV. But we just purchased a Sony PVW-2600 Beta deck, and I believe that I'm needing to purchase some kind of interface.
Is AJA the only or best choice for me? Can you give me some suggestions?
Thanks so much!
Bryce

It's not the only choice, as Blackmagic/Decklink make good cards too, as do Aurora. But whether it's the best choice is another matter. There's lots of different decisions to make - HD compatibility? Effects acceleration? Monitoring outputs? Rack mountability?
Others will respond.

Elite HPE-180t & ATI HD 4650 - Best Way for 3 Monitors?

I have 3 Monitors:
1. Asus 23.6in [DVI, HDMI, VGA]
2. Asus 23.6in [DVI, HDMI, VGA]
3. LG 22in [HDMI, VGA]
From what I've read here, and since I haven't been able to get 3 monitors running off of my ATI HD 4650, I'm trying to find the least expensive, best my system can handle, and best in the long run to use.
So, here are my choices:
1. Install another PCI card?
A. Any suggestions? Low cost..
2. USB 2.0 VGA/DVI/HDMI Display Adapter
A. Any suggestions?
Thanks
Glee
Below is my setup.
HP Pavilion Elite HPE-180t PC
AZ222AV#ABA
Genuine Windows 7 Professional 64-bit
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-920 quad-core processor [2.66GHz, 1MB L2 + 8MB shared L3 cache]
16GB DDR3-1066MHz SDRAM [4 DIMMs]
1 Terbite 7200 rpm SATA 3Gb/s hard drive
1GB ATI Radeon HD 4650 [DVI, HDMI, VGA]
TV tuner, ATSC-NTSC with PVR, remote
This question was solved.
View Solution.

The ATI Eyefinity requires the third monitor to be a display port or dongle. You will also need a different video card.
Go to www.newegg.com and look over the ATI 5670 and 5750. Look at carefully at the card's connection ports. This ATI 5670 card should work along with an adapter for your third monitor. There are also other choices for cards but some may be double wide so you need to see if a double wide would fit. You PC has 460 watt PSU so keep that in mind when chosing a card.
HP DV9700, t9300, Nvidia 8600, 4GB, Crucial C300 128GB SSD
HP Photosmart Premium C309G, HP Photosmart 6520
HP Touchpad, HP Chromebook 11
Custom i7-4770k,Z-87, 8GB, Vertex 3 SSD, Samsung EVO SSD, Corsair HX650,GTX 760
Custom i7-4790k,Z-97, 16GB, Vertex 3 SSD, Plextor M.2 SSD, Samsung EVO SSD, Corsair HX650, GTX 660TI
Windows 7/8 UEFI/Legacy mode, MBR/GPT

Wrong choice for a monitor?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for