Wrong execution in FAGLGVTR - Balance Carryforward

Hi Gurus, We made an error executing the transaction FAGLGVTR - Balance Carryforward. We supose to write 2011 in carry forward to fiscal year field, but we put 2010. are there some solution in order to reverse it?
Thanks a lot.
Ruth Herrera P.

Hi,
There is no negative impact because or running the carryforward in previous year. if you have BI you may have to load the opening balance again. for next year 2011 run carryforward that should be good.
Regards
K.R

Similar Messages

Balance carry forward ( FAGLGVTR - Balance Carryforward (New))

Hello experts,
can you explain us postings when we execute transaction FAGLGVTR.
Does all P&L accounts will be closed in previouse year 2007 and posted to retained earnings account ?
We see that balance is carry forwarded to retained accounts in new year 2008 but P&L accounts does not have any posting to their oposite sides in previouse year 2007.
Also because non of the real postings had hapened on retained earing account, how can we now do closing postings to capital Please help us if you can
Edited by: Dusan Stojanovic on Feb 20, 2008 6:35 PM
Edited by: Dusan Stojanovic on Feb 20, 2008 6:36 PM

Hi,
When the balances are carried forward, the net of all values of the P&L G/L Accounts are transferred to the Retained Earnings Account. There is no real accounting posting done in the system for this. But when you go to the new year, the P&L Accounts are shown with zero opening balance as their balances have got transferred.
For Balance Sheet Accounts, the balances have to be carried forward to the new year and for P&L they have to be set to zero. Hence the balance carry forward transfers the net of all values in P&L G/L Accounts to the retained earnings account which is a balance sheet account.
This values can be seen in G/L Balance Report as carried forward values for the retained earning G/L.
Hope this helps.
Ramanand Bhatt

Balance Carryforward - Non-Leading Ledger

Hello SAP'ers,
We have 2 ledgers, 1 leading of course with a Fiscal Year of June to May, and one non-leading ledger with a fiscal year of April to March. I can't find any documentation on when to run the balance carryforward program for the non-leading ledger. We have started FY2009 for our non-leading on April 1/ Do I run FAGLGVTR - Balance Carryforward (New), for the non-leading ledger only? I know in June I will run it for the leading. SAPs info is fuzzy regarding the non-leading carryforward process.
Thanks for your help.
JIm

Hello,
I am not sure if I understand quesition correct.
1. Internal order per ledger - this link might give you some information.
FB50L FI-posting to an internal order
You can report internal orders per cost element (acutal and plan)
Use reports in: SAP Menue/ Information Systems/Accounting/Controlling/Reports for Internal Orders/Summarization Reports or/and More Reports
as an instance: S_ALR_87013010
direct output to Excel and drill down functionality for details.
2. GL balances per ledger: use F.08 and select ledger, then you have report per ledger
Let me know if this is what you have expected.
all the best Erwin

Balances Carryforward issue

Dear Experts,
We have done carryforward balances in FAGLGVTR for all GL accounts for the year 2008 to 2009. Now the issue is that two accounts balance has not been transfered. when I checked in the log I can see the two accounts balances carryforwarded. But the same is not appearing in April.
I have run the FAGLGVTR again. The same thing happened again as above.
Can anyone suggest me how I can reconcile that. Because of these two balances the Balance sheet for April is showing a huge difference.
Raj

solved

Post journal of Balance carryforward

Hello Expert,
Normally In SAP R/3, when we run balance carryforward of GL account (Tcode:F.16), system will carry forward balance in next year and dont post any journal in FI.
One of our client of china wants to post journal of Balance carry forward . Is it possible in SAP R/3? and what is use of posting key which customized in OB53 transaction?
I heard that it was possible in SAP R/2. I dont know whether it is right or wrong.
please help me.
Thanks

Yes dear you can carry forward balance through Journal entry. I dont see any reason why you cannot do the same in thing in SAP R/3.
As far as OB53 concerns, defined posting key are used while carrying forward balances of P & L accounts through F.16 to Reatained Earnings account.
This will not have any impact on your JV if you are posting the same manually.
Regards,
Sheetal

The values of balance carryforward after new gl migration are incorrect

Hi,
We have already activated the new GL, in January 2009.
When we execute the transaction code FAGLB03 for one G/L account and for year 2008, the system doesn´t show the respective balance carryfoward in the column Cumulative balance.
However this not happens for year 2009, because the values are in new gl tables (FAGL_CARRY_FORW).
The balance carryfoward is not showed for any year before new gl migration.
We have to execute some program or implement some sap note?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Ana Fernandes

Hello,
Did you try FAGLGVTR transaction for balance carryforward after migration.
Regards,

GL balance carryforward

Hi,
When i am doing GL balance carryforward through using t code :f.16 the system shows below mentioned
*Balance carryforward is not possible; GLT0 update is not active*
Message no. FAGL_MIG401
Kinldy send me your suggestion.
Regards
Ravi
Moderator: Please, avoid asking basic questions

Please use FAGLGVTR for balance c/f

Wrong Execution Plan getting picked on some occassions

Hi,
The following query sometimes runs efficiently; gives quick results, CPU and IO utilization is also up to the mark. But sometimes the query takes very long time to execute.
At that time I do not observe any blocks as well. Also the CPU and IO is too huge for running this query. It seems the engine picks up wrong execution plan some times.
This query is fired through some product. So there is no scope to change the query. Any suggestions for the engine to pick up right execution plan?
select i . bpd_instance_id as instanceId , i . instance_name as instanceName , bpd . name as bpdName , istatus . name as instanceStatus , t . subject as taskSubject , tpriority . name as taskPriority , t . due_date as taskDueDate , t . attached_form_ref as taskAttachedInfoPathFormRef , t . attached_ext_activity_ref as taskAttachedExtActivityRef , t . task_id as taskId , tstatus . name as taskStatus , tuser . user_name as assignedToUser , tpriority . ranking as taskPriorityRanking from msadmin.lsw_task t with ( nolock ) inner join msadmin.lsw_bpd_instance i with ( nolock ) on t . bpd_instance_id = i . bpd_instance_id left join msadmin.lsw_task_status_codes tstatus on t . status = tstatus . status_value left join msadmin.lsw_bpd_status_codes istatus on i . execution_status = istatus . status_id left join msadmin.lsw_priority tpriority on t . priority_id = tpriority . priority_id left join msadmin.lsw_bpd bpd on i . cached_bpd_version_id = bpd . version_id left join msadmin.lsw_usr_xref tuser on t . user_id = tuser . user_id where ( t . status in ( '11','12' ) and ( t . user_id = 5909 or t . task_id in (
select t . task_id
from msadmin.lsw_task t with ( NOLOCK )
inner join msadmin.lsw_usr_grp_mem_xref m with ( NOLOCK )
on t . group_id = m . group_id
where m . user_id = 5909
and t . user_id = -1
) or t . task_id in (
select t . task_id
from msadmin.lsw_task t with ( NOLOCK )
inner join msadmin.lsw_grp_grp_mem_exploded_xref x with ( NOLOCK )
on t . group_id = x . container_group_id
inner join msadmin.lsw_usr_grp_mem_xref m with ( NOLOCK )
on m . group_id = x . group_id
where m . user_id = 5909
and t . user_id = -1
) ) ) order by taskDueDate , taskPriorityRanking , instanceId , taskId

Is it a good practive to update a stat nightly on all the tables with FULL SCAN? will it help to boost the performance?
Maybe. But it may also be overkill, particularly if you do not have the hours. A somewhat better option may be to run with FULLSCAN, INDEX to only update the statistics for indexes. But note that if you rebuild an index, that updates the statistics for that
index with FULLSCAN anyway.
But overall, there are rarely any magic button to performance tuning. In the end, you will need to do the hard work to find the painful queries that need better indexes or needs to be rewritten.
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, [email protected]

Balance Carryforward Error

When the balance carryforward package is executed the package progress status is "Complete" but the detail log which follows states an error occurred but no details are provided and there are no baances carried forward.
/CPMB/MODIFY completed in 0 seconds
/CPMB/CLEAR completed in 0 seconds
[Selection]
(Member Selection)
ENTITY:
C_CATEGORY: C_100
GROUPS:
TIME: 2009.JAN
[Messages]
Error found in BPC
Application: LEGALAPP Package status: SUCCESS
The logic, which validated successfully is:
//For running balance carry forward rule (copy opening)
*RUN_PROGRAM COPYOPENING
    CATEGORY = %C_CATEGORY_SET%
    CURRENCY = %GROUPS_SET%
    TID_RA = %TIME_SET%
*ENDRUN_PROGRAM
The rules validated successfully:
Source Account Source Flow Destination Account Destination Flow Reverse Sign Data Source Type
1                          F_999                                             F_100                  Unchecked
39000000            F_999           25712000                  F_100                  Unchecked             All
39000000            F_999           25712000                  F_ARES               Checked                All
Any suggestions for resolving the error are greatly appreciated.

Hi Dan,
Can you please confirm:
- Whether you are using a YTD or Periodic application
- Any settings have been made in your category dimension properties (source category, month, year)
- You have set-up your data source to carry forward and the source data source is of Type I or M
- Your flow dimension includes a dedicated opening flow
- The Period number and Month have been entered correctly in your time dimension properties
I assume you are trying to carry forward December records into Jan? If you're following a non-calendar fiscal year this can cause issues if you're using a periodic application. We've had a situation at a client whereby they had to enter the Period 12 property as DEC even though, the month was JUNE, but this was using 7.0 NW SP3.
Can you recreate the error in a copy of Appshell?
Cheers
Stuart

F.08 Report- Balance Carryforward issue

Hi,
When i execute the F.08 Report for year 2008. It is showing the balance 88,481.83 for the GL Account 100104 (Wells Fargo Checking) as Accumulated balance.
But when i execute the same F.08 report for the year 2009,It is showing the balance 902,247.63 for the GL Account 100104 (Wells Fargo Checking) as Balance Carryforward.
for almost all GL Accounts it is showing the differance amount. why the 2008 year end balance & 2009 balance carry forward balance in F.08 are Differance?
why those Accumulated balance in 2008 & Balance Carryforward in 2009 are not matching with each other. Kindly help me.
Thanks
Kishore

Hi,
We have had GO-LIVE on 2008 April. They have executed balances carry forwrad for 2008 only. Do they need to carry forward balances for 2007 also?
Is this the reason, that the system is showing differances in F.08 report.
Kindly help me
Thanks
Kishore
Edited by: Emergys Corp on Nov 24, 2009 8:56 AM

Balance Carryforward problem

Dear Experts,
Please help
When there is no balance in fiscal year 2010 for a particular GL Account , but still there is a balance carryforward amount that appears in fiscal year 2011 in FS10N/FAGLB03
how can this be rectified
Regards,
Charmaine Martin

Are you saying the ending CUMULATIVE GL balance for a particular GL account in fiscal year 2010 is not the same as the beginning balance carryforward cumulative balance in fiscal year 2011 for the exact same GL?
Make sure that there are no selection restrictions when running the two displays or there were no timing differences. You may want to run a detail line item display for the GL account to determine what entry or entries are causing the problem and then look at those entries in depth.
you may want to look at the following thread..
GL Account Balance in New General Ledger (ECC6.0) FAGLB03 / FAGLL03 / FBL3N

FI Closing-balance carryforward

Hi Experts
We are in the proces of year end closing. Our fiscal year ends in September.
I would like to know if we can make postings in the new fiscal year without doing the balance carryforward. Can the balance carryforward (AP, AR, GL) be done in October (Period 1 - new fiscal year).
Will the above apply to Asset accounting also, i.e, can we make postings in the new fiscal year to assets before we do the balalnce carry forward. Can the balance carryforward for Assets be done in October (Period 1 - new fiscal year).
Thanks
Raz
Moderator: Please, search SDN

Hi,
FI-GL,AR,AP (F.16 and F.07 )
You can do it at any point of time. If you post any transaction in previous year after carrying forward the balance, the system dynamically updates the carry forward.
AA - AJRW
You need to execute AJRW to post any transaction in new fiscal year. This is just a technical step to carry forward all assets into the new fiscal year. So you can't post any transaction in new year without executing AJRW (Of course, you need to open year in FI as well).
Best Regards,
Madhu

Balance carryforward consolidation unit with equity method

Hi experts,
One question in relation with balance carryforward in SEM BCS 4.0. Do Additional finantial data of Consolidation unit with equity method must be carried forward to following periods?
I have a problem with AFD validation for equity method.
Best regards,
Beatriz B.

Thanks Halim,
I am not using consolidation unit combination. It is only Legal Consolidataion. However, I have fixed the problem by changing the master data of consolidation unit. I have enabled FCEP.
I have one more question. Do I have to run Consolidation Group Change Task also when I am switching from Equity method to Purchase method for Associate companies?
When I am changing from Equity to Purchase method all the previous C/I postings are reversed, but the profit of Associates which was already accounted by holding company in the previous period is transfered to Net Income-Method Change and second effect is given to Goodwill (GW is enhanced).
Hence, post change of method, when I upload TB of Associate, the Net Income is not eliminated to the extent of the profit Adjusted on account of Method change.
Please suggest,
Thanks,
USR

FI: value of balance carryforward missing in fk10n

Hi gurus,
I have a problem with the customer balance carryforward.
in transaction FK10N at the end of 2008 I have a balance carryforward value of 1.518.000 eur for customer wwwww.
in the same transaction at the start of 2009 I have a balance carryforward value of ZERO for the same customer.
at the end of 2009 I have balance carryforward value of 560000 eur, at the start of 2010 I have balance carryforward value of 560000.
I think that there is a missing value at the start of 2009.
how can I restore the historical data?
thanks
V.

Hi Vallex,
try to run again transaction f.07 for the vendor and then see in fk10n if something change.
don't run the tc in test.
regards
R.

SAP - BPC (balance carryforward)

Hi all,
I have a question about SAP u2013 BPC.
How are the balance carryforward executed and is the document inversion automatic as in SEM-BCS?
The question is, when I enter in SAP u2013 BPC at 001.2009 will I have the balance carryforward from 2008 automatically? Or do I have to do something extra?
And is the document inversion automatic?
Thanks for your help.
Best regards

Hi,
this is not the place for SAP BO PC.
Please check the BO forum.
There is a howto : "How To Build the Carry Forward and Account Transformation Business Rules".
Search for it here: [https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/articles-epm-all|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/articles-epm-all]
or.... get the direct link here:
[https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/b026be43-40cf-2b10-6cae-ed8900ace7f9|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/b026be43-40cf-2b10-6cae-ed8900ace7f9]
BR

Wrong execution in FAGLGVTR - Balance Carryforward

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for