Wrong images displaying

In my slideshows, and other image boxes, often times the wrong image will display. It displays an image from another area of my website. When this happens, it stretches the incorrect image to fit it into whatever aspect ratio the original image was supposed to be.
Right now the issue can be seen on http://www.williamvanbeckum.com/blog.html
The image being displayed is supposed to be square, but is being stretched. The image that is supposed to be there is a rectangular horizontal image.

CS4 needs a good video card and the latest drivers to work well. More details on what are you using would be helpful to narrow the problem down.

Similar Messages

Aperture 3 display wrong image while editing (video example)

Aperture 3, clean install, running on an upgraded Aperture 2 library. Whenever I make a change to a photo, Aperture displays the previous photo on the screen. It correctly edits the photo I have selected, it just displays the wrong image while doing so. Anyone else have this issue?
Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4bRI9xFBEKI

It seems you have a rare problem.
If the advice already given regarding upgrades fixes thing then all well and good.
If not you might try Matthew Bergsmas tip in:-
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2357072&tstart=0
This reads as follows:-
Go to the finder and move everything in these folders to the trash:
Hard Drive/Library/Caches
Hard Drive/System/Library/Caches
Hard Drive/Users/Your username/Library/Caches
Then reboot.
=====
Aperture will rebuild the caches but give it time.
AW

PS CS5 Image Display Differs From Used ICC Profile In Win 7

Hi,
on my Windows 7 Ultimate x64 machine, I just calibrated my Dell SP2309W monitor using an i1DisplayPro and basICColor 5, creating a ICC v2 profile (I am aware of the problems under Windows with ICC v4 profiles).
It created the ICC profile and applied it to be used by Windows. I double checked under COLOR MANAGEMENT that the new ICC profile is being used. Although I can see that the new ICC is being used (desktop appearance changes), there are a few issues I am experiencing:
(1.) Windows Photo Viewer
The thumbnails in Windpows Explorer look fine (they DO use the new ICC profile), when I double click a jpeg and open the image it DOES NOT use the new ICC profile. When I click the PLAY SLIDESHOW button (starting the slideshow) in the opened image in Windows Photo Viewer, the images DO use the new ICC profile.
(2.) Internet Browsers
All current internet browser (Firefox, IE, Safari and Chrome) DO use the new ICC profile and display the image correctly.
(3.) Photoshop CS 5
When I open the same image - that Windows Photo Viewer does not correctly displays (according to the new ICC profile) - in Photoshop CS5, I get the same image display that Windows Photo Viewer gives me (when not thumbnail or not in slideshow mode) - it appears to be the sRGB display.
My color settings in PS CS5 are: North America General Purpose 2 > sRGB IEC 61966-2.1.
When I go to View > Proof Setup > Monitor RGB I get the image display using the new ICC profile.
Why does the image look different in PS than my calibrated monitor should output ?
I was under the impression (please correct me if I am wrong), that the sole purpose for calibrating my monitor was to get a uniform display across (ICC aware) applications. Even when one applies different color spaces to a document in PS, I thought the output on my calibrated screen done by the graphic card should always be according to my calibration and the settings in the ICC profile being used.
What Am I doing wrong or what am I misunderstanding ?
Any help or input is appreciated !
Thanks.
- M

Hello,
A note on monitor calibration: calibrating your monitor will not guarentee that every application will display color correctly, it's more of a step along the pipeline, and for the preview part of a color workflow it's the last step. Here's how color translation follows for an ICC workflow when previewing to a monitor:
Image Color Numbers > Document Tag or Workspace Profile > Monitor Profile
For non-color managed applications, if the original document is or isn't tagged with a color profile it will be translated directly to the monitor profile anyway. This is the equivalent in Photoshop of selecting "Monitor" in soft proofing. Selecting monitor in softproofing will bypass the tagged or workspace profile to translate colors directly through the monitor profile.
For most automatic color managed applications (like Firefox), the image will be translated through the tagged profile and then sent through the monitor profile. If the image is untagged or the profile is unrecognized, the colors get sent directly to the monitor profile.
For Photoshop, a tagged document will have its profile respected and then sent to the monitor. An untagged document will be assigned the workspace profile, which acts like a temporary document profile, and then gets sent to the monitor. This is often why users will notice Photoshop behaves differently from other applications. It's usually a case of the workspace coming into play. By default the workspace profile is set to sRGB. You can change this in Edit > Color Settings.
The purpose of the workspace is originally for printing workflows, as a way of keeping consistant color translations when dealing with both tagged and untagged documents. For web output workflows it can be useful for viewing everything through sRGB, which is typical of the average monitor output (not so with newer wide-gamut monitors, another source of confusion...) combined with the fact that originally most web browsers were not color managed. Hence viewing everything through sRGB is pretty close to what most monitors see and what untagged/unmanaged docs will look like.
Monitor calibration is useful only because it brings your monitor output to a "known state". In traditional workflows the monitor was always a middle-man, a preview device which was useful for getting an idea of what the printed output would look like before you print it. Since print colorspaces are often smaller than display spaces, it's feasible and useful to narrow down the monitor/display space and calibrate it to a known state, so that even if it doesn't totally match the print, you'll get used to its differences/limitations and they'll be consistent so long as the calibration is maintained.
For web output, your final output is often another user's computer monitor, which can have any form of behavior (most standard monitors are pretty close to sRGB, or use sRGB as an operating system workspace (default monitor profile). Wide gamuts behave differently, but I'm not sure if there's a particular ICC space that they closely match, or if different wide-gamuts are even that close to each other in their display color spaces.
Hope this helps!

Flickering problem with live viewing with IMAQ Image Display

Hi everyone,
I am trying to write a program to do live imaging with Andor camera. I am using some examples from Andor. The images are acquired in sequence and send into IMAQ Image Display and also Intensity Graph. There is minimal flickering issue in the Intensity Graph but there is very bad flickering problem in IMAQ Image Display. Perhaps I misunderstand how to optimize the vision tools. Does anyone know how to overcome this issue? I have attached the code that I am testing. Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Han Yen
Solved!
Go to Solution.
Attachments:
iXonRTA_live_0.0.1.vi ‏70 KB

You can use Vision Assistant to test our vision functions. Vision Assistant is really meant to prototype - it does not have all teh functionality of Vision Development Module and is not as flexible as we don't allow you access to all the settings for every function.
I recommend starting in Vision Assistant and then porting over to LabVIEW or C (whatever you are most comfortable with)...this is built-in functionality. There is nothing wrong with using Vision Assistant to do live imaging, just that you run into limitations and you will only be able to use this code on computers that have Vision Assistant.
Hope this helps.
--Michelle
Instrument Control R&D
National Instruments
Instrument Control
Machine Vision

How do i create a Count for the no. of images displayed on stage

i am a total newbie in flash ! & currently making a simple mcq quiz.
each stage will have three choices of answers (A/B/C)
every correct answers will be displayed an image :
var myQ1a:URLRequest=new URLRequest("tick.png");
in the end, how can i count the number of images displayed in the overall flash and display it.
or.. perhaps you have other options on how can i display the scores.

Hi.
here's my code :
stop();
aa1.addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, ona1Click);
bb1.addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, onb1Click);
cc1.addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, onc1Click);
next1.addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, onNext1Click);
home1.addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, onHome1Click);
var Q1a:Loader;
var Q1b:Loader;
var Q1c:Loader;
var Q1next:Loader = new Loader();
var Q1home:Loader = new Loader();
//the name of the function has to match what you're calling from the event listener
function ona1Click(evt:MouseEvent):void {
Q1a = new Loader();
bb1.removeEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, onb1Click);
cc1.removeEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, onc1Click);
var myQ1a:URLRequest=new URLRequest("wrong.png");
Q1a.load(myQ1a);
addChild(Q1a);
Q1a.x=320;
Q1a.y=180;
function onb1Click(evt:MouseEvent):void {
Q1b = new Loader();
aa1.removeEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, ona1Click);
cc1.removeEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, onc1Click);
var myQ1b:URLRequest=new URLRequest("tick.png");
Q1b.load(myQ1b);
addChild(Q1b);
Q1b.x=320;
Q1b.y=260;
function onc1Click(evt:MouseEvent):void {
Q1c = new Loader();
aa1.removeEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, ona1Click);
bb1.removeEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, onb1Click);
var myQ1c:URLRequest=new URLRequest("wrong.png");
Q1c.load(myQ1c);
addChild(Q1c);
Q1c.x=320;
Q1c.y=340;
//next1.addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, onNext1Click);
function onNext1Click(evt:MouseEvent):void {
if(Q1a)
removeChild(Q1a);
if (Q1b)
removeChild(Q1b);
if(Q1c)
removeChild(Q1c);
gotoAndPlay(2);
//home1.addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, onHome1Click);
function onHome1Click(evt:MouseEvent):void {
gotoAndPlay(17);
this code is on the 1st frame. this will go on till the 15th frame. i wonder where i can put the codes you've given me ..

Loading new xml data into a already xml populated image display

Hi everybody,
I have a question about loading new xml data into a already xml populated image gallery.
So I have my gallery set up so it calls some xml when it first loads. What I would now like to do is load different sets of images via a different xml sheet via the click of a button.
So for example the loaded gallery already has all thumbs loaded and user can click on them to view the full size image. So next instead of the user having to close this gallery to allow a new gallery to open with a different set of pictures I would just like to have a button. This button will unload the existing thumbs from the gallery and load in new ones from a different xml file.
If anybody can help me with this it would be great as I am still on a steep learning curve with AS3.
Here is my AS3
var xmlPath:String = "pictures.xml";
var xml:XML;
var loader = new URLLoader();
loader.load(new URLRequest(xmlPath));
loader.addEventListener(Event.COMPLETE, xmlLoaded);
function xmlLoaded(e:Event):void
     if ((e.target as URLLoader) != null )
          xml = new XML(loader.data);
          createMenu();
var numberOfItems:uint = 0;
var menuItems:Array = new Array();
function createMenu():void
          numberOfItems = xml.items.item.length();
     var count:uint = 0;
          for each (var item:XML in xml.items.item)
          var imageLoader=new Loader();
          var menuItem:MenuItem = new MenuItem();
          menuItem.addChild(imageLoader);
          imageLoader.load(new URLRequest(item.url));
          menuItem.linkTo = item.linkTo;
          menuItem.mouseChildren = false;
          menuItem.addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, itemClicked);
          menuItems.push(menuItem);
          addChild(menuItem);
          count++;
function ***():void
     //menuItems.sortOn("zpos3D", Array.NUMERIC | Array.DESCENDING);
     for (var i:uint = 0; i < menuItems.length; i++)
          setChildIndex(menuItems[i], i);

Thanks so much for the reply Andrei1
I think maybe my lack of knowledge when it comes to AS3 is not helping me at the moment because I thought I understood the code you supplied but there is something not going quite right.
So I messed around with the code and added the new_loaded_thumbs_btn to load in the "new_pictures.xml" but I am def doing something wrong.
import flash.ui.ContextMenuItem;
var xmlPath:String = "pictures.xml";
var xml:XML;
var numberOfItems:uint = 0;
var menuItems:Array = new Array();
var loader = new URLLoader();
loader.addEventListener(Event.COMPLETE, xmlLoaded);
loadXML("pictures.xml");
new_loaded_thumbs_btn.addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, loadXML);
function loadXML(path:String):void {
     loader.load(new URLRequest("new_pictures.xml"));
function loadXML(path:String):void {
     loader.load(new URLRequest(path));
function xmlLoaded(e:Event):void
     xml = new XML(loader.data);
     createMenu();
function createMenu():void
     clearMenu();
     numberOfItems = xml.items.item.length();
     var count:uint = 0;
     var imageLoader;
     var menuItem:MenuItem;
     for each (var item:XML in xml.items.item)
          imageLoader = Loader();
          menuItem = new MenuItem();
          menuItem.addChild(imageLoader);
          imageLoader.load(new URLRequest(item.url));
          menuItem.linkTo = item.linkTo;
          menuItem.mouseChildren = false;
          menuItem.addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, itemClicked);
          menuItems.push(menuItem);
          addChild(menuItem);
          count++;
     sortChildren();
// removes previously placed objects
function clearMenu():void {
     var menuItem:MenuItem;
     while (menuItems.length > 0) {
          menuItem = menuItems[0];
          removeChildAt(getChildIndex(menuItem));
          menuItem.shift();
function sortChildren():void
     //menuItems.sortOn("zpos3D", Array.NUMERIC | Array.DESCENDING);
     for (var i:uint = 0; i < menuItems.length; i++)
          setChildIndex(menuItems[i], i);
When the image display 1st loads it displays the new_pictures.xml thumbs which I thought would load through my new button when clicked.
And there was me thinking I was getting the hang of AS3.
Could you please point me in the right direction in what I am doing wrong,
Thanks for your time and effort in advance

Image Display got rotten (really: the Indicator, not the Image!)

I'd like to hear comments on the following VI, containing just a single Image Display Indicator, which, for some reason got corrupted during porting across LV versions and resizing. By divide and conquer I found that it was the origin of pretty odd problems that I was observing in a complex VI: absence of front panel updates, pull down menues not displayed, actions needing a double press of buttons, and so on.
The VI is saved from LV2012 windows, also attached as saved for 8.5. Just opening it, on 2 installation of Labview, I turn labview into something responding oddily. (try to pull down a menu, e.g.). Linux LV seems not to suffer from it, maybe because it places a nonfunctional FP placeholder for this control, without trying to cope with its nonfunctionality.
The question is perhaps, why LV doesn't detect the problem and behaves so weirdly with it -- bug?
Enrico
Attachments:
BadImage.vi ‏34 KB
BadImage85.vi ‏36 KB

Yes, I was able to see this trouble as well. Checked in different versions (2010 and 2012 x86/x64). But was unable to re-create this VI from scratch. It seems to be that Vision Control was broken in customization attempt where cluster with buttons was rearranged from vertical to horizontal position (may be in combination with saving for previous LabVIEW version).
Time to time I do the same (for example save VI with vision controls from v. 8.6 to 7.1) and I've got lot of situations when "downgraded" VI cannot be opened or caused just crash, or broken. Something is wrong.
Quick and dirty analysis of the given "BadImage.vi" shows that the problem with refreshing is present. LabVIEW tries to refresh this control continuously.
In Process Explorer we can see one thread with 100% CPU load (overall 20-25 percent, because I have 4 CPUs):
In Call Stack we may see DrawImageControl function which is called from niviswnd.dll.
Well, load this stuff into debugger, set breakpoint and see - this function called continuously:
called somewhere from SetPIClusterPartSize from LabVIEW.
I don't want to go deeper into call chain analysis (anyway makes no sense without source), but short walking in debugger shows that messages continuously fired:
Check it with Spy:
There are thousands WM_PAINT messages which continuously sent to the Window with this weird control. Looks like attempts for update, but due some internals errors this called again and again.
The messages queue is full with WM_PAINT - therefore LabVIEW is "unresponsive" - context menus cannot be shown, dialogs cannot be closed, slow reaction, etc.
Sorry for slightly off-topic above, but may be this will be helpful for NI's engineers for further investigation.
Andrey.

Go back to old image display

I just updated to Firefox 11 and the new image display is awful. When I go to an image URL (like this http://www.google.com.br/images/srpr/logo3w.png ) it's displayed with a dark background. It would be better if the background was soft grey... but it's too dark!
Is there a way to use the old image display, with white background or changing the background color?

<strike>I don't think that you can use code in userContent.css to fix this</strike>.<br />
<strike>There is no selector possible to set the background-color for the body if there is only an img (body > img:only-child) on that page.<br />
Only a script would be able to accomplish that AFAIK.</strike>
It looks that I'm wrong about this.
*http://userstyles.org/styles/58710/firefox-11-change-image-view-background
*http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=38&t=2443535
Add this code to userContent.css in the chrome folder
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/userContent.css
<pre><nowiki>@-moz-document regexp("((.*\\.(png|apng|jpg|jpeg|gif|tiff|bmp))|(^data:image\\/.*))(\\?([^#]*))?(#(.*))?") {
html > body { background-color: #E8E8E8 !important; }
html > body > img:only-child { background-color:#fff !important; box-shadow: none !important; margin: 0 !important; }
</nowiki></pre>
* resource://gre/res/TopLevelImageDocument.css

Why won't the images display in this flash widget?

why won't the images display in this flash widget?
http://www.coffeeandcandles.com/Wholesale_s/41.htm

more info would help. If you're using actionscript and
loading images from a folder maybe your path to that location is
wrong. It's possible that your images aren't in the right layer or
level but noticed that when initially published.

LR 5 - Image Sizing Dimensions - wrong image size

Hi,
Image Sizing Dimensions produces wrong image sizes upon export for certain images.
Example, I have export set up for iPad resolution, 2048x1536px at 264ppi. If I now export an 3264x4928px image it should be resized to 1356x2048px. What I get is 1356x2047 instead, one pixel too short on the long side. This doesn't happen for all images source resolutions and ratios though. I haven't figured out the pattern yet.
Here a link to an image which exports at wrong size (export dimension set to 2048x1536px).
http://www.bobtronic.com/files/IMG_0289.JPG
I would appreciate a speedy fix for this problem. Thanks
cheers,
Matthias

The image has a resolution of 3264x4928. Exporting using Dimension resizing of 2048x1536 results in an 2047x1536 image.
The scaling factor 4928 down to 2048, is 0.4155844155844156...
Assuming that LR is working to only 3 decimal places here, which indications discussed in another thread would suggest, then there are several ways to achieve that:
truncate down to 0.415 by discarding the subsequent digits
"quick-rounding" of the third digit by inspecting the fourth-place digit only, and incrementing the third-place digit when the fourth-place digit is larger than 5, which it is not in this case, resulting in 0.415
"math-rounding" by inspecting all of the following digit pairs in turn, until you reach a pair that is lower than 50, and then working back again to simplify. This procedure rounds 0.41558 up to 0.4156, then after doing that, rounds 0,4156 up to 0.416
Speculation: the difference between 0.415 and 0.416, is the difference between a result with 2047, and one with 2048, when executed.
Most of the time the "quick-round" procedure will work out fine, also truncating will usually be good enough, assuming the above has anything to do with the reality (which it may not). Just occasionally, though, there'll be an error in the final digit, compared with what the theoretically accurate procedure would have given. So if I am right this is not strictly speaking a bug (something failing to execute as it has been designed to do), but the result of a software design choice. "Works as designed", iow .
It seems that LR, perhaps differently between versions, is working this through by simple calculation (from the front-end), without comparing the back-end outcome against what you have requested. How much this (intermittent) issue actually matters, is a question of judgement, and of particular requirement.
[ alternative method: I find the Print module, outputting to JPG, is completely reliable when it comes to making a standardised JPG as to the dimensions, as well as offering some different technical and design options, than what you get with Export. For one thing, you get the option of on-the-fly cropping to shape, which you can then adjust interactively where (as here) the image is a different aspect than the Retina display. So if you want it, you can fill the screen instead of getting letterbox, all without having altered your main (Develop) crop for that image. Alternatively, if you don't want the Zoom to Fill option (e.g. with landscape images to be shown in portrait orientation as part of a sequence) you can still make all your images to the same dimension, but controlling the appearance of the borders that are left (which become part of the image) ]
RP
ps: AFAICT one would expect simple truncation to produce the appropriate answer half of the time; one would expect simple rounding to just one further digit, to be wrong half of the times when the following digit happened to be 5 - or to put in another way, to be right in 95% of cases; and proper rounding, examinng as many places as it takes, to be right 100% (within precision limits).

Wrong images appearing in project window / timeline

I'm doing a SIMPLE slideshow project for a frient. I've got a file folder of images that I imported into CS5. In the timeline the correct images are not appearing when placed from the timeline. Even in the Project folder most of the images are not what they are in explorer. Most, when opened in the Source Monitor are the correct image, even though the wrong image is appearing on the timeline, but even there many are not correct. What is happening is that the image of about 15 of the 105 imported images are appearing in the place of all of the other images. It's like something is cached, and the appropriate linkages aren't being made.
What's even more frustrating is that the ONLY effect applied to all of the impages is Scale to Frame. There are no transistion. Nothing.
What simple solution is there for images not importing into CS5 correctly?
ARGH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Thanks for that suggestion. It DOES work! However, it is time consuming since I'm working with over 1,000 images. Instead, I was able to discover the following solution:
The culprit was the magic checkbox under Edit -> Preferences -> Media for "Write XMP ID to Files on Import." This setting writes a GUID to all media imported into Premiere for use with all Adobe apps. I actually found the reference to it in an After Effects forum. I didn't fully understand exactly why this is useful when I'm only working with still images. My guess is that somehow these GUIDs became crossed over.
I disabled this checkbox, deleted all references to the affected media, and deleted all cache files, including all files under C:\Users\Username\AppData\Adobe\Common\Media Cache. I then reimported the originals of my source files from my network attached storage (SO thankful that I moved them offline without touching them). Viola! Everything works.
It was critical that I made copies of all of my data to my NAS. Adobe actually writes this GUID for the XMP ID to the file itself, which changes the modification date of the actual file. So, I guess the error will follow the file wherever it goes (in an Adobe application) unless it's resaved in PhotoShop to correct the error. Luckily, the files on my NAS were untouched by Adobe, since I made copies to work with locally. Only the local files were affected. Once I disabled the checkbox, then Adobe no longer attempts to modify files on import and leaves them intact.

Image display control scrolling does not work properly when zoomed in

I am using a ROI on an image in the image display control. When zooming into the image to fine-adjust the positioning of the ROI, the image scrolling does not work properly. As far as I understand, the image should scroll automatically when the ROI is leaving the visible area. However, the scrolling behaviour seems to depend on the origin of the Labview panel, not the origin of the image display control, which might require to move the ROI way out of the visible area before the scrolling takes place. In other words: the coordinate system of the image display control is shifted with respect to the true visible image area, depending on where you place it on the front panel. As a consequence, when clicking on a ROI which is in the visible area, but is outside of what Labview thinks is the visible area, it might immediately jump to the left border of the image, making the positioning of the ROI really difficult.
Has anyone noticed this behaviour, and what would be a reliable solution to avoid this?
Dirk

Hello,
no, I am not talking about the tools palette. Just place an image control with some image in it on a new VI front panel. Then, use the rectangle from the tools and select a ROI in the image. If you zoom in (using the magnification glass), and then grab the ROI and move it around, the image scroll with the ROI. So far, so good. If you now place the image control elsewhere on the panel, or add new control above it, resize the panel, etc. , this scrolling when moving the ROI will not work correctly if the origin (0,0) of the panel is far away from the image control.
I have attached a VI for simplicity (although there is hardly any code in it).
If you make a ROI and try to move it down, you will notice that scrolling starts if you move the mouse out to about 10cms below the image (depens on your screen, of course). After that, if you click on the ROI, the scroll bars and ROI might jump up to the upper end of the image. Imagine how annoying this is if you try to finely adjust the ROI position.
I think it is a bug in the implementation of the image display control.
Thanks,
Dirk
Attachments:
scrolling.vi ‏818 KB

Why does moving the mouse over an IMAQ image display slow the GUI down so much?

I have a large application with several vi's running simultaneously under labview 8.6.1. When I mouse over an image display control in one of the vi's, everything slows down a shocking amount in all the other vi's. The windows task manager does not show a large increase in CPU use. My pc is has a quad cpu with 4GB of RAM, and the CPU and memory loads do not appear to be terribly taxing to the system. However, many of my vi's apparently come almost to a standstill if I just move the mouse in a circle around my image control.
This looks like it is largely a GUI display issue. If I make a new vi and put a while loop in it that only displays the iteration loop number to an indicator, I can see the iterating occurring, then stopping totally when I mouse inside the image display control. When I stop moving the mouse inside the control, or when I move it outside the control, the interation loop number jumps up, as if it had been incrementing behind the scenes the whole time. So only display of the interating was halted.
This problem occurs even if the vi with the image control is not executing. If the vi with the image control is open but not running, and I mouse over the image on it, the other guis all come to a screeching halt.
Does mousing in the image display control really utterly crush all other guis in all other labview windows? Is this an issue inherent to the image display control? If so, is there anything I can do about this?
Also, this issue is not entirely limited to display. I started looking at it in greater detail because this issue also exposed what I think is a race condition in my code. I have a vi that acquires an image from a ccd and puts it into an IMAQ image.ctl. This image then gets passed up to a vi up the call chain, and is put on a queue and sent over to be de-queued by a vi that has the image display control. Here's the kicker: when I mouse over the image display control, the image successfully gets acquired inside the subvi, and if I probe the wire leading to the output IMAQ image display.ctl, I see the image. If I simultaneously probe the wire coming out of the subvi one level up the call chain, the image gets lost about half the time. This only happens if I am mousing in the image display control IN A TOTALLY DIFFERENT AND SEPARATE VI. If I bump up the priority of the ccd image acquisition vi to 'highest priority', the problem only happens about 1% of the time, and I really have to mouse around to make it happen. Still, it's disturbing that mousing in the GUI in one window results in a failure of a separate subvi to simply pass an image up the call chain. I understand that IMAQ images are referenced rather than passed by value, but I don't see why there should be a failure to pass the image up the call chain. I've looked for a race condition, but can't find one.
Eric

I have finally been able to replicate the behavior that you are seeing on another computer once the image was large enough. Here are a few notes about this behavior:
First. The UI only slows down when the images are large, 16 bit images. The reason why this is unique to 16 bit images is that they can only be displayed on the front panel as 8 bit images. The workaround that Weiyuan suggested to change the 16 bit display mapping hints towards the root of the problem...that any time a mouse runs over the indicator, Windows asks the entire image to re-draw (having a separate indicator overlapping the image will create the same behavior). With a 16 bit image, not only does the image have to re-draw on the screen but the 16 bit pixels need to be mapped to 8 bits. When setting the 16 bit display mapping to Full Dynamic, this requires mor computation/pixel than 90% dynamic or one of the other mapping schemes.
This is expected behavior if your program is running and you're trying to display a large 16 bit image. To fix this behavior there are a couple options:
Change the 16 bit display mapping to something other than full dynamic. You can choose which 8 bits to display or if you want to map the bits.
Resize the image just for viewing purposes on your front panel (since you aren't going to view every single pixel of you image on the screen). You can use the IMAQ Resample.vi to do this. This will allow you to take your 1500x1500 pixel image and only display a 500x500 pixel version.
If you are interested in viewing small details of the large image, consider just displaying a smaller region of interest at a time.
Let me know if any of these solutions work for you. Good luck on your application.
Zach C.
Field Engineer
Greater Los Angeles

Is this a bug of Outlook 2007 about images displaying in signature?

I've done many tests and researched on website or MS KB. But still got no solution.
My issue is:
I make a signature with images linking from website which can be easily accessed.
I setup this signature in Outlook 2007, when I compose a new mail, and choose the signature I set. It won't show the images with a high percentage rate, meanwhile, I try to get into "Signature"-"Signature...",
Outlook2007 gets stuck, then you can not close Outlook or open Internet Explorer unless you kill the process of OUTLOOK.exe.
1. Test are done under a clean XP system and Office 2007 standard fresh installed. Also there are some other staffs who help me test the signature that report the same issue on Office 2007.
2. Images are rendered in 96dpi. They are all in very small size stored on website, can be easily accessed without network connctivity problem.
3. The signature is made by simple HTML language not by Outlook signature setup wizard. but in this case, you can ignore which method I use to create the signature. The images in signature can be displayed well in Outlook 2003 &
2010. Also I have tried insert images using "link to file" in Outlook signature setup wizard, got same issue.
4. Don't suggest me to store the images locally. These images should be updated after a period. You can not ask the company staffs to update these images manually by themselves. and even if the images are stored locally, the images won't be shown
in Outlook 2007 with a high percentage rate.
5. I've tried setup signature with or without an account profile, got same issue.
6. I 've tried without an accout profile, just copy the signature file to Outlook signature folder, unplug the network cable, and "new mail" then load the signature, of course, the images won't be shown because network connection doesn't exist,
and then when I try to get into "Signature"-"Signature...", the Outlook interface also gets stuck. So I think Outlook 2007 may have some problem on detecting the network connectivity.
7. It is not possible to upgrate the version of Office. Since Office 2007 isn't out of date and is powerful enough for us, no one want to pay more money just to avoid this issue.
I don't know why I cannot upload a screenshot for troubleshooting. If needed. I can send a mail with screenshot attached.
So far to now, I still get no solution, I think this is a bug of Outlook 2007, because the same signature, there is no problem on Outlook 2003 & 2010. Hope someone of MS staff can see this article and report to technical support center.
I would appriciate anyone's kindly help but please consider that you understand what I am talking about. I don't want to waste time for each of us.
thanks in advanced.

What kind of problem about the display image in signature?
How do you add the image into the message body when you send the message?
Does it show correct through Web-based access?
Outlook 2007 doesn't support some of Style Element, you may reference the link as below:
http://www.campaignmonitor.com/css/
Thanks.
Tony Chen
TechNet Community Support
Thanks for your reply, I know that some Style Elements won't be supported in Outlook, but this is not the reason.
Please refer to my post previously, I post it but get no response.
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/office/en-US/481170b1-f23f-4d46-9914-823326491846/is-this-a-bug-of-outlook-2007-about-images-displaying-in-signature?forum=outlook

Error in Search results - Sorry, something went wrong. Display template had an error

I'm receiving this error in custom search results page in our SharePoint 2013 Enterprise farm:
Sorry, something went wrong.
Display Error: The display template had an error. You can correct it by fixing the template or by changing the display template used in either the Web Part properties or Result Types.
'console' is undefined (CoreRender: ~ sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_mycustom_Site.js
I believe a similar error was resolved by March 2013 CU but our farm us running Aug 2013 CU. I have also tried adding domain to trusted zone in IE but still the same error.
I do not get this error in Google Chrome or in IE 10 or above. Not sure if it is an issue with my display template because error disappears when upgrading IE to 10 or 11.
Update: In IE 8 I can see search results with no error if the developer toolbar (F12) is enabled!
-- The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of anybody else -- http://manojvnair.blogspot.com

Hi ,
Did you try these steps
Open up the SharePoint 2013 Management Shell as Administrator
and run the following command: Enable-SPFeature SearchWebParts -url http://<central admin
url>
Use a browser on a different machine, or add you SharePoint
site(s) to the ‘Trusted Sites’ in IE.
Activate the feature : “My
Site Host“. This is a hidden feature scoped at the Site Collection level. The feature ID is 49571CD1-B6A1-43a3-BF75-955ACC79C8D8.
The feature folder under SharePointRoot is MySiteHost.
Install the update: http://www.microsoft.com/en-in/download/details.aspx?id=36989
Here are some similar threads for you to take a look at:
http://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/questions/70452/query-builder-for-result-source-not-working-in-central-admin
http://www.thesharepointbaker.co.uk/sharepoint-2013-gotchas-2/
http://bernado-nguyen-hoan.com/page/2/
Ref:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/6e86cf3f-8001-4d13-a700-9e70d8828f03/controlsearchboxjs-not-found?forum=sharepointsearch

Wrong images displaying

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for