_Wrong Posting getting done by RERAPP before RERAIV_ in RE-FX

Salute Masters!!
Wrong Posting getting done by RERAPP before RERAIV in RE-FX
After doing posting through RERAPP, system is picking other paid transactional detail while creation of RE Invoice.
Say... Rs. 1000/- has been posted on 11 March 2011 by RERAPP, in between party has paid Rs. 500/- on 15 March 2011, while creation of Invoice by RERAIV on 20 March 2011, instead of Rs. 1000/- Invoice, system is showing Rs. 1500/- Invoice.
How to rectify this?
Rgds.
Srivastav
+91 7829755109

Hi,
This is no the right forum for this message. It should have been in Real Estate Forum. As far as your problem goes, when ur are running the tcode RERAIV, there is an option of putting the posting run ID. Whenever there is a posting through RERAPP a posting run ID is generated. If you pass the same in the RERAIV. The system will not pick any other value.
Hope this helps..
Regards,
Deepak

Similar Messages

I need a help !!! Please ,I dropped my iPhone 5 in toilet and I didn't get fast maybe 5mins before I get it because I didn't notice drop it and it won't work now it's almost 1week I'm waiting it still it don't work ...

I need a help !!! Please ,I dropped my iPhone 5 in toilet and I didn't get fast maybe 5mins before I get it because I didn't notice drop it and it won't work now it's almost 1week I'm waiting it still it don't work ... But when I plug my charger it goes light and show up apple logo and die again I don't know what to do and it's so expensive here at Japan pls.. Help maybe there still way to get it work again
Thank you ,Rean

At this point it's clear that it's been damaged and will need to be take or sent to Apple for replacement.
Regards.

I am trying to download photos from my camera to iphoto on my mac book (which I have done many times before). This time I am getting an alert that saysThe photo "IMG_5965.JPG" could not be opened, because the original item cannot be found. Help?

I am trying to download photos from my camera to iphoto on my mac book (which I have done many times before). This time I am getting an alert that saysThe photo “IMG_5965.JPG” could not be opened, because the original item cannot be found. How can I fix this?

There is a fair likelihood of an explanation of this symptom
in another ASC discussion thread; see the reply by léonie:
https://discussions.apple.com/message/20165563#20165563
You may have to research any newer possibilities in trouble-
shooting or resolving issues by use of iPhoto Support page.
Since I don't use iPhoto as a primary editor or storage, the
details on the topic aren't so good. I prefer ToyViewer editor.
•iPhoto Support
•iPhoto Video Tutorials
Hopefully the error is easily corrected.
Good luck & happy computing!

Is it possible to post a good issue movement before post the good receipt m

Is it possible to post a good issue movement before post the good receipt movement for the same material, into the same period?
We try to explain better, today we've done a test:
Step 1 :   We have created a material, wich material type is HAWA, with price control V, and 1 euro for 1 ST.
Step 2 :   We have post a good receipt movement, 561 of this material with 1000 ST of stock, and on posting date: 05.05.2011.
Step 3 :   Then, we have post a good issue movement, 562 of the same material, with 500 ST of stock, on posting date: 01.05.2011 ( so that, the posting date of the 562 is before from the posting date of 561).
And it has worked, so that on trx "mb51" for this material we saw:
PLANT1-----STO1---- 562----- Mat. Doc.101.05.2011--
500-   ST
PLANT1-----STO1---561Mat. Doc.205.05.2011--
1000 ST
And with "fbl3n" for this G/L account , the same situation:
G/LAccount1--DocumentNo101.05.2011--99--
500- EUR
G/LAccount1--DocumentNo205.05.2011--89--
1000 EUR
We don't like this fact, someone knows how is it possible? The negative stocks aren't flagged!!!!
Edited by: Ariana Serrano Aguila on May 5, 2011 5:50 PM

Hi,
Though sap allows like this ,, the document created will be with the date of the actual posting system date. If you look into the MSEG table you will get to know this.
In theory .. this kind of practice should not be allowed .
since this is a 562 which is a individual entry may be system would have allowed.you try a 102 .
Regards,

Upgraded to ADSL2 now get slower speeds than befor...

Hello
Well last Tuesday my line was upgraded to the 20mb ADSL2 and I was looking forward to some increase in bandwidth (even though before the upgrade my line was pumping 7mb most of the time which I was happy with)
Now for some reason I am getting slower speeds than before I upgraded. Something tells me I should not have bothered with the amount of effort it took to get the upgrade.
I cant understand why my DL is saying 3000+ and before upgrade it was reading 7500+
I have not reset my hub manually all disconnections have been done automatic.
Here are my router stats and I have been reading a few posts and I am hoping someone can shine some light on this for me:
BT Home Hub - DSL Connection
DSL Connection
Link Information
Uptime:
2 days, 0:36:48
Modulation:
G.992.5 annex A
Bandwidth (Up/Down) [kbps/kbps]:
687 / 3,347
Data Transferred (Sent/Received) [MB/GB]:
177.59 / 3.69
Output Power (Up/Down) [dBm]:
9.5 / 0.0
Line Attenuation (Up/Down) [dB]:
14.5 / 28.0
SN Margin (Up/Down) [dB]:
12.5 / 19.0
Vendor ID (Local/Remote):
TMMB / IFTN
Loss of Framing (Local/Remote):
0 / 0
Loss of Signal (Local/Remote):
2 / 0
Loss of Power (Local/Remote):
0 / 0
Loss of Link (Remote):
0
Error Seconds (Local/Remote):
17 / 0
FEC Errors (Up/Down):
0 / 0
CRC Errors (Up/Down):
0 / 97
HEC Errors (Up/Down):
0 / 96
Line Profile:
Fast
Software version: 6.2.6.H
Solved!
Go to Solution.

That's good to hear
Enjoy the speed
-+-No longer a forum member-+-

While installing OD XE 11 g, I get error message just before finish

the message is like couln't get data local {7e-ie-....) XE registration.
I have downlaoded the zip file for win 32.
i was told that this prg will install in my 64 bit OS (Windows 7).

A: While installing OD XE 11 g, I get error message just before finish

Hello, and welcome to the OTN forums!
i was told that this prg will install in my 64 bit OS (Windows 7).Who told you that, and why don't you ask him/her why it didn't work? (just kidding...)
In fact, XE 11.2 is currently not supported on 64 bit Windows machines. See the [url http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E17781_01/install.112/e18803/toc.htm#BABHICJH]System Requirements documented in the Installation Guide for XE 11.2.
The error you receive has been reported often when people tried to install on 64 bit anyway. There are workarounds for that issue, e. g. described in this thread: {thread:id=2289186}
-Udo

Wrong posting to asset in last fiscal year

Hi Gurus
Posting was done on the wrong asset number x instead of y in the last financial year.
depreciaion is posted to the asset X for almost 11 months in the financial year 2011
please specify the options available to transfer the whole acquisition amount and the depreciation amount(book and tax dep) that is booked to the wrong asset X to the asset y.
the balance in asset number X after transferring will be 30K (NBV). these postings have happened prior to the year 2010
the wrong posting occurred in last janaury (fiscal year april to Mar)
thanks in advance
regards
sap student

Do an ABUMN using a gross transfer and all the posted depreciation in the sending asset will be shown up as value adjustment in the receiving asset and in the next year, you see this value adjustment in the accumulated depreciation bucket.

Report for wrongly posted vendors

Hi All,
I have made payment to the wrong vendor and the check also realised. At that time I passed a jv to balancing the account instead of creating credit memo. Now I would like to get a report like what are the vendors has been wrongly posted. This is for creating credit memo purpose. How to track the wrong vendor postings.
Thanks...

Hi,
You have paid wrong payments to Venodrs either manually or automatically it doesnot matter.
System doesnot know that payment has been made to wrong vendor. So you have to find the vendors manually. otherwise your financial statments will be affected.
Thanks
Chandra

How to reverse wrongly posted unplanned depreciaiton

Hello Gurus,
There has been wrong posting of unplanned depreciation for an asset and now the user needs to reverse such posting.
This occured when the Asset was transferred and some unplanned depreciaiton was posted wrongfully. Now the user wants to reverse the unplanned depreciation.
Can someone please help me with the steps and the T-Codes to reverse such wrong unplanned depreciaiton posting.
Would be really nice of you.
Thanks
Subhankar

Hi,
With u201CUnplanned Depreciationu201D posting, as immediately it will not be posted to FI and no FI document will be generated. It will be posted in next normal depreciationrun i.e., Whenever you run the t-code AFAB-Depreciation Run as part of month-end activities, system will post the u201CUnplanned depreciationu201D along with normal depreciation. So there will be no FI document will be generated with u201CUnplanned Depreciation posting. You need to reverse only Asset document . For this purpose do the following steps :
Option :1: a) Go to t-code-AW01N-Asset Explorer, specify the Asset No., click the posted u201CUnplanned depreciationu201D value
                     and get the Asset Document No. which is available under the head u201CTransactionsu201D.
                   b) Use t-code-AB08 and reverse the Asset document     OR
Option :2: a) Go to t-code AS02-Change Asset Masteru2014Depreciation Areas, keep the Depreciation key with u201C0000u201D value
                   b) Run t-code-AFAB-Depreciation Run with u201CRepeatu201D option by giving/selecting the only the specific Main
                     Asset No. and Asset Sub-number at the bottom of the screen.
Regards
appalas
Edited by: appalas on Dec 14, 2010 1:21 PM

Business area wrongly posted for invoice

Hi All,
Business area wrongly posted for invoice.
The user was posted the invoice with two line items one with posting key 40 for debit and one is 31 for credit vendor, these two line items are posted with different business areas. and the the invoice is cleared also.
Could any one please suggest what the above issue affects the business. what would be the resolution to be done for this.
Thanks in advance
Nandha

Hi All,
The balances are not matching in fbl3n and fs10n, Due to the above wrong document posted and cleared also. what is the better way to match the two balances (fbl3n and fs10n).
Can i reverse the cleared wrong document and reset it in fbra, if i do this is there any problems occur in production.
please suggest to tally the balances of fbl3n and fs10n.
one more thing if i double click on the fs10n the another screen will open in the the total balances are matching in fbl3n and fs10n.
Please any suggest me to come out of this issue
Thanks in advance
Nandha

Gr/ir wrong posting account-how to track error

Dear Expert,
For some PO, there were wrong posting in IR.After checked in OBYC and material master, user has already maintained the valuation class and the customizing also correct.
How this could be happened since the customizing and val.class already correct?
How to track the caused of error then?
Please advice.
Thank you.

Hi Susmitha,
You need to develop a small report for this. SAP stores the delivery information of email in SOST table.
The emails are stored in this table with message type (msgty) 'S' or 'I'.
If the emails are delivered the message no. (msgno) in this table becomes '711' or '701' or '73'. For all other message number it indicates the message is not delivered.
However the table is updated after a certain time limit (half an hour to two hours normally) to get the delivery status of the email. So you need to run the report after a certain time to get the actual delivery status of email. There may be few cases where the delivery status may be update after 24 hours also if performance is slow of the system. But normally this does happen in a normal condition. But this is the table where you can identify the delivery status of the email.
When you are sending email using FM SO_DOCUMENT_SEND_API1, SAP generates an uniques object number for each email. It can be found in the importing parameter of the FM in field new_object_id+5(12). You need to store this object number so that you can search with this in SOST table to get the delivery status.
Hope it helps.
Thanks,
Nirmalya

GI for outbound delivery is not getting done despite of the enough stock

Hi SAP Gurus,
I was trying to post the goods Issue for the outbound delivery through VL02N. But I'm getting the Error <b>"M7 021" Deficit of BA unrestricted use</b>. I've created a Tranfer Order for the Delivery and also confirmed the transfer order successfully. The delivery quantity is already there in the destination storage type/bin. But still the GI is not getting done. I'd moved the material from two different storage types to the origin storage type to fullfil the delivery quantity. And then I did LT03 ( TO for Delivery) to move the quantity out of the origin storage type to the destination storage type.
A help from someone of you will be much Appreciated.
Thanks
Dhaval Joshi

Hi there!!
Yes we are using batch split option. Delivery quantity was automatcally splitted into several batches using FIFO rule as all the materials in the system are batch managed. so when you do LT03(TO for delivery) the system will FIFO the bathes to fulfill the delivery quantity from the storage type(s) selected. Eventually the delivery quantity will be splitted into several batches and FIFO rule is realized.
I've checked the all the batches and it seems that the system is giving this error for the batches which were FIFOed from one storage type. Other batches which were FIFOed from a different storage type doesn't have this Error message for Deficit of BA unrestricted Use. I wonder if this has something to do with the storage type.!!!
I really appreciate all the vaulable inputs from all you folks.
Thanks
Dhaval

Is it possible to post a good issue movement before post the good receipt

Is it possible to post a good issue movement before post the good receipt movement for the same material, into the same period?
We try to explain better, today we've done a test:
Step 1 :   We have created a material, wich material type is HAWA, with price control V, and 1 euro for 1 ST.
Step 2 :   We have post a good receipt movement, 561 of this material with 1000 ST of stock, and on posting date: 05.05.2011.
Step 3 :   Then, we have post a good issue movement, 562 of the same material, with 500 ST of stock, on posting date: 01.05.2011 ( so that, the posting date of the 562 is before from the posting date of 561).
And it has worked, so that on trx "mb51" for this material we saw:
PLANT1           STO1         562           Mat. Doc.1           01.05.2011            500- ST
PLANT1           STO1         561           Mat. Doc.2           05.05.2011           1000 ST
And with "fbl3n" for this G/L account , the same situation:
G/LAccount1            DocumentNo1            01.05.2011        99            500- EUR
G/LAccount1            DocumentNo2            05.05.2011        89            1000 EUR
We don't like this fact, someone knows how is it possible? The negative stocks aren't flagged!!!!
Edited by: Ariana Serrano Aguila on May 5, 2011 5:50 PM

SAP only checks if there is enough quantity in the period (month), it does not check if there is enough stock at date level.
there is no stock stored in any table for a given date. SAP would need to run the logic of MB5B to calculate the stock at a certain date, this would cause tremendous performance issues.
you either have to do this calculation yourself in a user exit, or you better train your users.

Wrong photo gets flagged

I have a weird problem with the wrong photo(s) often getting flagged for rejection in the Ligthroom3 Beta. Here's one way to make it happen:
1. In grid view select a number of photos, say 6
2. Switch to survey view
3. Flag all but 2 for rejection and click the little X box in the bottom right corner of the images to deselect them
4. Switch to Compare mode to compare the final 2 images. For this example, let's say images #3 and #6 are still unflagged and selected
5. Flag one of the images for rejection. Let's say you flag image #3.
6. Switch back to grid view
I would expect that photo #6 would not be flagged, and the rest would be flagged. Instead, all but image #3 are flagged.
I've also had the wrong photo get flagged when I still had multiple images in survey view, but I'm not sure what sequence of operations produces that behavior.
Is there something wrong with the way I'm trying to use flags?

Please post your question to the LR3beta Forum:
http://forums.adobe.com/community/labs/lightroom3
McL

I installed snow leopard which I now realise that it was the wrong one because it came out before my laptop and now it won't changed from the grey screen with the apple on it how do I fix it ???

MacBook Pro
Apple - Support - MacBook Pro
Mac OS Version builds
When did yours come out? what does the above show as model and minimum build?
You should have yoru OEM OS X DVD, not one from another Mac, or retail, though the last retail OS X DVD was a year ago 10.6.3.
If it installed, I don't see an issue unless the drive had corrupt directory etc.
What you need to do is repair your boot drive or restore from backup.

_*Wrong Posting getting done by RERAPP before RERAIV*_ in RE-FX

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for

_Wrong Posting getting done by RERAPP before RERAIV_ in RE-FX