WRT150N Access Restrictions Not Working

Good day everyone.
I read posts that were similar to my problem in the forum but none of the solutions suggested solved my current quandary.
I am using a WRT150N with firmware v1.00.5. I have a Linux setup with Squid connected to the network with the gateway 192.168.23.254. The WRT150N has a gateway of 192.168.23.1. The WRT150N is also connected to an Apple Base Station which serves as the Access Point for WiFi users.
Squid limits access for IP addresses listed under the .254 gateway. But once I change my gateway to 23.1, everything is accessible. I want to block sites as well on the WRT150N. But every time I try to put a new Access Restriction, it doesn't work.
I put in the IP Addresses on which to apply this restriction:
The reason it skips addresses is because, the addresses are reserved. I click on Save Settings here and I save the settings again on the main page.
Everytime I try to test it on the given addresses, I can still access the pages. Is there something I'm missing?
Thank you in advance for your answers.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Try to upgrade/ re flash the firmware on your router.
Connect computer with the Ethernet cable to the router Ethernet port.
Download the firmware from the Linksys website .
Open the setup page of the router.
Go to the Administration tab and go to the sub tab Firmware upgrade.
Browse and select the downloaded firmware and upgrade the firmware .
After upgrading the firmware reset and reconfigure the router settings manually .
And see if that helps you .

Similar Messages

WRT54GL Cannot get access restrictions to work

I purchased a WRT54GL router (v1.1 with firmware 4.30.7) and I cannot for the life of me get the access restrictions to work. I made three policies, one for my PC with 24/7 access and one for the kids PC with access from 7pm to 9pm during the weekdays and another for the kids PC with access from 12pm to 10pm on the weekends. whenever I enable the policies, my PC can access the internet but the kids cannot (of course during the proper times). When I disable their policies they still cannot get on till I also disable my policy. I have gone thru everything I can think of including multiple hard resets but access restriction simply will not work.
Of course there is no mention of my hardware or firmware version anywhere on the linksys support system! Anyone have any thoughts?

hmmmmmm... have you tried using the IP address instead? based on my experience, the Acces Restriction policies are a bit tricky.
Too bad the WRT54g has no parental controls which is a lot easier to configure.
"Don't fix it if it ain't broken."

Alternate Access Mapping not working for Zone : Intranet

One of our client want to set Alternate Access Mappint (intranet) with url "intranet.theirDomain.com" with local IP address.
is it possible?
subsequest to my previous question (
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/3f39711e-301a-40e8-aa7a-855fa2c268b1/alternate-access-mapping-not-working?forum=sharepointadmin )
I want to ask one more question
Can we configure "intranet.theirDomain.com" with local IP address for any other zone?
or
If there is ".com" within the url then it can't be configured for InTRAnet?
Thanks
S H A J A N

The names for the zones don't matter. You could use the 'extranet' zone for another intranet name if you wanted, the names are just to make it a bit more friendly for beginners.
What you describe sounds routine, you create a web application with a name, then use an AAM to allow users to access it with a more friendly name. Frequently you end up creating
http://intranet.domain.com and
http://intranet as an AAM, or vice versa.
You can use .com for an intranet site, you would need to add the site as an A Host record in your DNS server so that traffic is sent to your internal server rather than out into the wider world.

Can't get Access Restrictions to work WRT54G v3

I am trying to get a cell phone to have access to my LAN from 3am to 7am. I gave the policy a name, allowed access, checked everyday and the time 3a to 7a. Under edit list of PCs, I entered the MAC address of the phone, and I have also entered the MAC address of the phone on the wireless>edit mac filter list, though didn't know if I should.
Anyway, I can't seem to get the Access Restriction to work and would appeciate any guidance...thanks

hmmmmmm... have you tried using the IP address instead? based on my experience, the Acces Restriction policies are a bit tricky.
Too bad the WRT54g has no parental controls which is a lot easier to configure.
"Don't fix it if it ain't broken."

E3000 Deny Access Restrictions not releasing

I've just recently purchased a Cisco E3000 router.
I've set up 3 Access Restriction - Deny policies using IP addresses.  Unless someone has a better idea I found I needed two policies to Deny from late at night (say 10.00pm) till first thing the next morning. As this spans two days I needed a Deny policy from 10pm till midnight, and another for the next day from midnight till say 7.00am.
Now to my problem, the laptops get 'Deny'ed exactly as they should within a few minutes of the set time, problem is they do not reconnect the next morning after the Deny time has passed.
Cisco help wasn't any help, and wanted me to use Cisco Connect. However the overly simplistic options it provides are next to useless for me.   The web option has more flexibility, if only it'd work.
Do I need to need to force an Allow to override the Deny but establishing a fifth policy just for this purpose? Don't know if this'll work but I've got no other ideas.
All help greatly appreciated

Anyhow, I'll answer my own question based on one nights experience.
Made the 5th (and last, don't know why all the reviews say you can have 10 policies, there are only 5) an Allow policy for the previously restricted IP addresses with the parameters of Allow everyday for 24 hours.
Last night the Deny policies as the first in the list worked correctly and the two restricted laptops had access back again at the set time. So on a test of one night it's all working correctly.
The trick was the inclusion of a universal Allow policy as the last policy to force a release of the Deny policies. I'll post again if it doesn't work at some point in the future.

Keychain access application not working.

keychain not working, click on the generic app. icon and it simply pops up and closes. reloaded osx10.4.3, but no results. anyone have suggestions?
powerbook g4 Mac OS X (10.4.3)

Next step is to create a new admin user account, log into it, and see if the problem remains. If not, then it's a problem with the original account. If so, then the problem's system-wide.
If the original account, you have two options: 1) try to find the corrupted file, maybe the com.apple.keychainaccess.plist file in ~/Library/Preferences/. Move it to the desktop, log out and back in, relaunch Keychain Access. If that doesn't work, then check all the .plist files with something like Preferential Treatment. 2) reset your prefs in the new account and eventually delete the original.
If system-wide, then reinstalling the OS using the Archive & Install option, saving user and network settings, might be your only option, especially since reinstalling the combo update didn't fix the problem.

Restrictions not working in BO Webi Report

Hello,
I have created a universe on BEx query. Now on this universe when i create reports with restrictions the restrictions are not working.
For example:
If i create a BO query with restriction say Doc_Number= 108994 and display Doc_Number and Delivery_Number then:
in Doc_Number column i get 108994 but in Delivery_Number column i get all the delivery numbers from the cube. In other words all Delivery_Numbers are retrieved when i restrict data for one Doc_Number and vice versa is also true.
Can anyone help me solve this issue?

Hello,
If i remove all the filters and include any of key figures then i get correct data.
But if i remove the key figure and apply a restriction say on Delivery_Number then i get incorrect data.
I too believe that ideally this should not happen.
eg:
Doc_NumDelivery_Number
111                      1010
222                      1234
333                      5678
Now if i include Doc_Num and Delivery_Number in query and apply filter Delivery_Number = 1010 then the output is
Doc_Num           Delivery_Number
111                      1010
222                      1010
333                      1010
Same is the case if i apply filter on Doc_Num i get all Delivery_Number.
What should be the reason behind such behaviour of the query????

"Document type" in access sequence not working in free goods

Dear All,
our requirement is to provide free goods with the main items in portal.
for this i defined access sequence 1.Customer/Material and 2. SalesOrg/Documnet Type/Material.
for access sequence Customer/Material it's working fine but when i use SalesOrg/Documnet Type/Material it's not working.
problem is that when i use Document type in access sequence it's not working.
pls help.
Radhashyam Sahoo

Hi Apoorva!
What do you mean with "Access Sequence"?
In CRM 7.0 EHP1 there is a generic framework-feature available which allows the defininition of the tab-order.
Best regards
Arno

Remote access vpn not working, VPNC client

Hi,
I have configured a remote access vpn client on cisco ASA 5520 with the following configuration. we are using cisco vpn client.
tunnel-group consultant type remote-access
tunnel-group consultant general-attributes
address-pool VPN
authentication-server-group RSA-AAA LOCAL
default-group-policy consultant
tunnel-group consultant ipsec-attributes
pre-shared-key *
group-policy consultant internal
group-policy consultant attributes
vpn-idle-timeout 120
vpn-session-timeout 720
vpn-tunnel-protocol IPSec
split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified
split-tunnel-network-list value access-spilt
access-list access-spilt standard permit host 10.101.50.60
One of the linux users is using vpnc and once the user connects to the vpn and the user adds a static route on the machine with the destination pointing to the vpn interface, for example 10.101.50.0/24, user is able to reach all the hosts in the subnet even though the access list on the firewall is configured for one host 10.101.50.60.
I did the same test on a windows machine, but was only able to reach the specific host allowed through vpn. why is the network filter not working for vpnc. please advise.
Thanks

Hi have solved the issue . enabling the demo 3DES & AES now my VPN is connecting
https://tools.cisco.com/SWIFT/LicensingUI/loadDemoLicensee?FormId=139
thx to friend "Jennifer Halim"

Alternative Access Mapping not working "You're not connected to a network"

Hi *,
i want to set up alternate access mapping in my sharepoint 2013 development environment.
My SharePoint is reachable through http://sp2013.
I created a second web application with listens on port 8080. When i open http://sp2013:8080 everything works fine and i can see my root site collection.
Next i added through "Add internal Urls" a new url -> http://sp2013test to the default zone.
Next i edited the bindings in the iss application for this web application and added http://sp2013test listening to port 80:
But i does not work! I get the message "You’re not connected to a network" from the ie.
I dont want have to call my WebApps through ports. I want to have WebApplication which i can call through clear names like http://customerWebApp1, http://customer2WebApp. All via Port 80.
Whats wrong here?
Best Regards
Bog
Developers Field Notes | www.bog1.de

Hi Bob,
For you issue, try to map web application URLs to the local loopback address. For that you need to update host file at the path:(C:\Windows\System32\drivers\etc\hosts)
Here is a link about Setup Multiple SharePoint Web Applications on Port 80 with Https Binding on Port 443, you can use as a reference:
http://onlinecoder.blogspot.com/2012/10/setup-multiple-sharepoint-web.html
Best Regards
Lisa Chen

Alternate Access Mapping not working

I am trying to configure alternate access mapping in sp2013.
My default url for site is https://intranet
My client has given a url https://intranet.theirDomain.com
When I ping "intranet.theirDomain.com" on their local machine it is returning IP: 192.168.0.87
When I ping "intranet", it is giving IP: 192.168.0.86
I have edited the Public Zone URL as follows
Default: https://intranet
Intranet: https://intranet.theirDomain.com
In IIS the following bindings are there.
https intranet 443 *
https intranet.theirDomain.com 443 *
But still https://intranet.theirDomain.com is not working
https://intranet is working.
I hope all are configured correctly.
Or doing any wrong? please guide me.
S H A J A N

It sounds like the 'intranet' A record in the theirDomain.com zone isn't pointed at the correct IP address (192.168.0.86).
Trevor Seward
Follow or contact me at...
&nbsp&nbsp
This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

Access point not work correctly

Hello everybody, I have a problem in my BlackBerry Passport. I can't turn on "access point" function,this function not work. Does this function work in the future OS updates?
P.S access point give your internet from the mobile network to your WiFi

Hotspot does work on all versions of BlackBerry 10 OS and all BB10 models. It is, however, controlled by your carrier. If it won't turn on you have one of several possible problems:
1) Your mobile data is off or not working.
2) You need to have Hotspot provisioned on your account by your carrier.

IP address restrictions not working with bea weblogic plugin

We want to implement IP address restrictions via the Sun Java One Web Server admin tool for our application. We are using the Sun Java One Web Server to proxy requests via the Bea Weblogic plugin. However, we cannot get IP address restrictions to work because of the leading asterisk in the following NSAPI entry for PPATH of obj.conf :
<Object name="weblogic" ppath="*/cmcsr/*"> Service fn="wl_proxy" WebLogicCluster="10.156.20.11:9010,\
10.156.20.12:9010,10.156.20.13:9010" DynamicServerList="OFF"
</Object>
Has anyone gotten IP restrictions to work with the bea Weblogic NSAPI plugin?

I'm not sure what you're asking, but each Service directive should be on its own line. It is an error to have both a <Client> tag and Service directive on a single line.

Family Base restrictions not working

We setup a family base account per the instructions and video. The time restrictions seem to be working fine but the list of trusted numbers is not working. Our son is still able to send and receive text messages through his iPhone 4 to anybody unless we specifically block their number on the Verizon account.
We found that even with Family Base restrictions setup, imessage bypasses those restrictions so we turned off imessage on his phone and setup restrictions on his iPhone itself. This stopped him from being able to use the imessage feature of the iPhone but people who are not setup in his trusted numbers are still able to get text messages through. We're frustrated because the family base is not working the way it's supposed to and we're being charge for this "feature."

Hi Billiam!
I'm sorry for any inconvenience with your son's iPhone 4 and the Family Base feature. Upon review of this feature, I see that the child companion app is not compatible with the iPhone device. Some features will work, and some will not, but this is due to the design of the iPhone. Here is some additional information for you: http://vz.to/15gGAxd
ChristinaB_VZW
Follow us on Twitter @VZWSupport
If my response answered your question please click the "Correct Answer" button under my response. This ensures others can benefit from our conversation. Thanks in advance for your help with this!!

Password to enable restrictions not working

My password for enabling restrictions is not working. I don't even remembering setting it actually. I would have made it easy but what I think it could be is not working. how can I unlock it?

Just try a Restore with iTunes.
Otherwise you can try this; http://www.simonblog.com/2011/03/16/how-to-recover-forgotten-iphone-restrictions -passcode/

WRT150N Access Restrictions Not Working

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for