WRT300n Internal Routing

I just picked up the WRT300n and am having diffculties. I will describe my internal network:
1 Windows 2003 server acting as Domain controller and DNS server at 192.168.1.175
4 Workstations running XP on DHCP range 192.168.1.100 - 104
WRT300n at 192.168.1.1
The problem is that when I try to ping my server by name, it sends the traffic out on the internet and does not keep it internally. I can ping by IP and get to the internet fine. This setup worked fine with my cheap 802.11b WAP.
Ok, where do I start?
Thanks up front

I guess I'm not understanding you. Here is the Ipconfig from a workstation:
Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection:
        Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : hsd1.co.comcast.net.
        Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Realtek RTL8139/810x Family Fast Ethernet NIC
        Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-10-DC-4D-D4-D5
        Dhcp Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes
        Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
        IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.160
        Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
        Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.1
        DHCP Server . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.1
        DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.175
                                            68.87.85.98
                                            68.87.69.146
        Lease Obtained. . . . . . . . . . : Wednesday, October 17, 2007 8:09:18 PM
        Lease Expires . . . . . . . . . . : Thursday, October 18, 2007 8:09:18 PM
The first DNS entry is for my internal server. The server is handling dns and has an A record of "server" and the correct IP. He is forwarding all other domains to 68.87.85.98.

Similar Messages

Can't get back to 300Mbps with my wrt300n v1 router?

Hello All, My wrt300n, v1 router has always worked great, straight out of the box.
I use various adapter cards and have never had a problem? All of the cards have connected at their individual full speeds? Except 1 Airlink 300n that connects at 270mbps? Still very nice, and what I see most people connect at.
The main PC on the network has a Dlink adaptor card, and has always connected at a full 300mbps, until now. I just moved, had my broadband installed just today. Everything is back up and working except the main PC is only connecting at 130Mbps?
Here's what I did that may have caused this. I had both homes for 2 weeks; I left my modem and Router in the older house. So I could use my laptop there if I had to until the new house was hooked up. Well when I went over to the old house and tried to connect the laptop I couldn't? I connected to the router but couldn't get to the net? I thought it might be a router setting, now that the rest of the pcs were not on the network any longer? So I logged into the router settings and restored factory defaults? The laptop still had the same problem? I just disconnected the whole setup, brought it to the new house.
Cox came today to set up. They actually used my laptop to connect to the network and test the lines? It connected as soon as we turned it on and didn't have a problem? However, when I tried to connect my main desktop it only connected at 130Mbps? Now my network is just called linksys of course because I restored defaults. Could I have changed anything else that would affect the Mbps on this PC? I was going to upgrade the firmware a while back just for GP, however I don't think I did after I read here; "if its working don't mess with it"? As I said though, this PC connected at 300Mbps when I first bought the cards and I don't think I had to do anything to get it to do that? That was close to 3yrs ago, w/o a problem until now?
Sorry for the long post but I wanted to explain as fully as possible.
Does any one have the answers, or even an idea as to what I need to do to get back to where I was?
Thanks in advance for all your efforts. This Forum and its users ROCK!
Alex

After you resetted your router you should try adjusting the wireless settings on your router...
Open an Internet Explorer browser page on your wired computer(desktop).In the address bar type - 192.168.1.1
Leave username blank & in password use admin in lower case...
For Wireless Settings, please do the following : -
Click on the Wireless tab
-Here select manual configuratioon...Wireless Network mode should be mixed...
-Provide a unique name in the Wireless Network Name (SSID) box in order to differentiate your network from your neighbours network...
- Set the Radio Band to Wide-40MHz and change the Wide channel to 9 and Standard Channel to 11-2.462GHz...Wireless SSID broadcast should be Enabled and then click on save settings...
Please make a note of Wireless Network Name (SSID) as this is the Network Identifier...
For Wireless Security : -
Click on the Sub tab under Wireless > Wireless Security...
Change the Wireless security mode to WPA, For Encryption, select AES...For Passphrase input your desired WPA Key. For example , MySecretKey , This will serve as your network key whenever you connect to your wireless network. Do NOT give this key to anyone.
NOTE : Passphrase should be more that 8 characters...
Click on Advanced Wireless Settings
Change the Beacon Interval to 75 >>Change the Fragmentation...
Threshold to 2304 Change the RTS Threshold to 2307 >>Click on "Save Settings"...
Now see if you can locate your Wireless Network and attempt to connect...See if you get the desired speed...If not you should un-install and re-install the wireless adapter...

How to set six WRT300N wireless router use the same SSID

I have six WRT300N wireless router and cannot setting shared the same SSID....
Somebody can help me?

please explain like how are you trying to set up these routers..... even if you set up these routers using the same ssid , they won't communicate with each other wirelessly....

Is the WRE54G range extender compatible with the WRT300N wireless router?

I bought a WRT300N wireless router, hoping it would give me better range than my old hub. It's pretty good, but I still have dead spots in my apartment. I'd like to buy a WRE54G range extender, but I don't know if it's compatible. Anyone try this?

i don't think that the wre54g would work with the n-router .. rather i would suggest you to setup a wap200 or wap54gp wired to the router and configured as an AP ... if it still falls short of the wireless range .. configure another one in a repeater mode ...

Internally Route DIO on R Series FPGA

Hello, currently using an R-Series PCIe 7852 board with LabVIEW 2010 SP1 on 64bit Windows 7.
I used to use a 6602 board and would sometimes use the RITS bus to connect the output of one counter to the input of another counter thus saving myself the trouble of having to physically connect them. On the 7852R board I'd like to connect the output of one DIO line to the input of another. I can physically use a wire but wonder if there's anyway of doing it internally like on the 6602?
Thanks,
Ed

Edward,
Stu is correct. On the FPGA you have access to all of the values at the same time, so you could either wire them together or simply just read off the original line instead of looping it back to another input. You actually have much more flexibility in terms of internal routing than on a 6602 card because all of the IO goes through the FPGA, whose behavior you define.The only caveat is that if youre going to be changing this often you may want to physically wire it instead of recompiling a bitfile to connect a single line.
Regards,
Kyle M.
Applications Engineering
National Instruments

MPLS - How are external/internal routes distinguished?

Hi all
I was setting up an MPLS environment and wanted to get some more information about how MPLS VPN's work. Basically I have three sites connected to the MPLS cloud. Site A runs EIGRP on the customer side and Site B runs OSPF on the customer side. Site C is the one in question. The way I have it designed, Sites A and C have full visability into one another and sites B and C have full visibility into one another. When I configure site C with eigrp, all proper routes are seen, but the OSPF routes from site B are seen as EIGRP external routes. When I switch site C to OSPF, EIGRP routes from site A are seen as OSPF External type 2 routes. I guess my ultimate question is, How does the PE router at site C know the originating protocol? All the routes it receives are from BGP. Does a certain attribute carry this? If so, is this feature specific to Cisco gear or an RFC standard? Thanks in advance for all your help. I can include configs if that would help, below I'll show you my RD and RT's for each VRF and the routing tables of the CE router at Site C before and after the change.
Site A
ip vrf a
rd 1:111
route-target export 1:100
route-target import 1:101
Site B
ip vrf c
rd 3:333
route-target export 3:301
route-target import 1:101
Site C
ip vrf a
rd 1:111
route-target export 1:101
route-target import 1:100
route-target import 3:301
Change from EIGRP to OSPF
Gateway of last resort is not set
     6.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
D       6.6.6.6 [90/435200] via 10.2.1.1, 00:05:26, Ethernet0/0
     7.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C       7.7.7.7 is directly connected, Loopback1
     8.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
D EX    8.8.8.8 [170/2560025856] via 10.2.1.1, 00:02:13, Ethernet0/0
D EX 111.0.0.0/8 [170/2560025856] via 10.2.1.1, 00:02:13, Ethernet0/0
     10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 4 subnets, 2 masks
C       10.2.1.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0/0
D       10.1.1.0/24 [90/307200] via 10.2.1.1, 00:05:56, Ethernet0/0
D       10.20.0.0/16 [90/435200] via 10.2.1.1, 00:05:56, Ethernet0/0
C       10.77.0.0/16 is directly connected, Loopback2
D EX 192.168.1.0/24 [170/2560025856] via 10.2.1.1, 00:02:43, Ethernet0/0
R7(config)#no router eigrp 22
*Mar 1 02:10:20.747: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(0) 22: Neighbor 10.2.1.1 (Ethernet0/0) is
down: interface down
R7(config)#router ospf 3
R7(config-router)#network 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 0
R7(config-router)#network 7.7.7.7 0.255.255.255 area 0
R7(config-router)#end
R7#show ip route
Codes: C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
       D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
       N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
       E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
       i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2
       ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route
       o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route
Gateway of last resort is not set
     6.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O E2    6.6.6.6 [110/409600] via 10.2.1.1, 00:00:27, Ethernet0/0
     7.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C       7.7.7.7 is directly connected, Loopback1
     8.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O IA    8.8.8.8 [110/21] via 10.2.1.1, 00:00:27, Ethernet0/0
O IA 111.0.0.0/8 [110/21] via 10.2.1.1, 00:00:27, Ethernet0/0
     10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 4 subnets, 2 masks
C       10.2.1.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0/0
O E2    10.1.1.0/24 [110/1] via 10.2.1.1, 00:00:26, Ethernet0/0
O E2    10.20.0.0/16 [110/409600] via 10.2.1.1, 00:00:26, Ethernet0/0
C       10.77.0.0/16 is directly connected, Loopback2
O IA 192.168.1.0/24 [110/11] via 10.2.1.1, 00:00:26, Ethernet0/0
R7#trace 6.6.6.6
Type escape sequence to abort.
Tracing the route to 6.6.6.6
1 10.2.1.1 652 msec 396 msec 192 msec
2 40.1.1.9 [MPLS: Labels 18/24 Exp 0] 2264 msec 2640 msec 2532 msec
3 30.1.1.3 [MPLS: Labels 18/24 Exp 0] 2320 msec * *
4 10.1.1.1 [MPLS: Label 24 Exp 0] 1816 msec 1792 msec 2148 msec
5 10.1.1.2 1940 msec * 2200 msec
R7#

Hello Edward,
I see nothing strange in the results you have posted. They are completely natural to the process of carrying customer routes over MPLS L3 VPN.
You know yourself that the customer routes are carried between PE routers using BGP, and from PE towards CE, these routes are redistributed from BGP into the particular routing protocol running between PE and CE. Each of these routing protocols automatically marks redistributed networks as external networks. For OSPF, this is a normal part of the open protocol specification - that routes injected into OSPF via redistribution shall be represented as external routes (and carried in LSA-5). Similarly, when you redistribute into EIGRP from a different routing protocol, these routes will be carried by EIGRP as external networks. So what you see here is natural and normal. Even if all sites ran the same routing protocol (EIGRP or OSPF), one site would see networks from other sites as external routes.
In fact, there are extensions to BGP using extended community attributes that try to preserve the original nature of the redistributed routes. The prerequisite is that all sites run the same IGP, either OSPF or EIGRP. In that case, EIGRP routes carried over MPLS can be made look like internal routes although they are redistributed, and OSPF will make the routes appear as inter-area routes, not as external routes. There is even a modification to OSPF allowing you to see other sites as intra-area routes (though this requires configuring so-called OSPF sham links between PEs). All of this is done because an internal network is always preferred to an external network. This causes trouble if there is a backup link directly interconnecting two sites, bypassing the MPLS cloud. As the routing protocol run over this link advertises all networks as internal, this link would always be preferred to the MPLS VPN which is exactly the opposite of what you want to do.
Please feel welcome to ask further!
Best regards,
Peter

Weird Internal Routing

Hi Guys,
Logic 8 has worked fine for over a year untill I used it with an Edirol firewire interface. I just have the sound coming out of the macbook pro's line out now and I get this very strange internal routing of the audio on one channel to other audio channels, basically doubling itself. It also does this when I drop in a loop from the loop browser.
If anyone can tell me how to sort this problem I'd be really appreciative.
I have one more issue also. I use EZ Drummer within Logic and want to mix each part of the kit separately. I've done the multichannel thing and then hit the plus sign in L8's mixer but all I get is a new aux channel. I've rescanned with the audio units manager but it does nothing, does anybody know how to fix this bug?
Best,
Alex

AlexReid wrote:
Hi Guys,
Logic 8 has worked fine for over a year untill I used it with an Edirol firewire interface. I just have the sound coming out of the macbook pro's line out now and I get this very strange internal routing of the audio on one channel to other audio channels, basically doubling itself. It also does this when I drop in a loop from the loop browser.
Make sure "Universal Track Mode" in Preferences/Audio is enabled.
I have one more issue also. I use EZ Drummer within Logic and want to mix each part of the kit separately. I've done the multichannel thing and then hit the plus sign in L8's mixer but all I get is a new aux channel. I've rescanned with the audio units manager but it does nothing, does anybody know how to fix this bug?
Alex, now set the Input of the newly created Aux track to one of the Multi-outs made available by EZDrummer.
pancenter-

3560 PBR including internal routes help

I'm attempting to use PBR on a 3560 switch. Everything seems to be working OK but we have some periodic CPU interupt spikes that are effecting performance.
I have three vlans
vlan 1 - 172.19.142.0/24
vlan 2 - 172.20.142.0/24
vlan 3 - 173.23.142.0/24
route-map PBR permit 10
match ip address 140
set ip next-hop 192.168.250.2
I'm trying to policy route all www and ssl traffic
ip access-list 140 permit tcp any any eq www
ip access-list 140 permit tcp any any eq 443
However I have two problems
1)I have internal web services, so I need www traffic from 172.23.142.0/24 ro route to 172.19.142.0/24 and this policy sends all www traffic out next hop of 192.168.250.2
2)When I add to acl 140
ip access-list 140 deny tcp 172.23.142.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.142.0 0.0.0.255 www
The policy works as expected but CPU starts to spike.
If I try to use 'set ip default next-hop XXXX' or change to 'route-map PBR deny 10' (for internal routed) the ip policy route-map pbr statement disappears from the vlan interface and cannot be re-added. No errors are displayed, it's just like the command is ignored.
I've looked at:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps5023/products_tech_note09186a00807213f5.shtml#pbr
Specifically
•Do not match ACLs that permit packets destined for a local address
•Do not match ACLs with deny ACEs
I'm looking for a way to impliment PBR for selective traffic (www and 443), but keep the internal routing intact using the same protocols (www and 443).
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Tom

I'm not entirely sure this will work but it is worth a try. if you can't use local subnets then you need to specify all possible internet addresses. The acl below uses wildcard masks to specify every possible internet address. Due to the way wildcard masks work all traffic between 172.16.x.x and 172.31.x subnets do not match the acl. if you wanted to be more specific to your subnets you could be but it would make the acl considerably longer. But as this whole range is private addressing it doesn't really matter or shouldn't.
Also to keep the acl short it does allow traffic to the other private address ranges ie. 10.x.x.x and 192.168.x.x but then so did your original acl. So you only need one permit statement in your route map with sets the next hop to 192.168.250.2.
I have assumed that you do not have any http/https traffic between internal subnets that you actually want to policy route. If you do this acl would not match and therefore they would be routed using the normal routing table.
permit tcp any 0.0.0.0 127.255.255.255 eq www - covers all class A networks
permit tcp any 0.0.0.0 127.255.255.255 eq ssl
permit tcp any 128.0.0.0 31.255.255.255 eq www - 128.0.0.0 -> 159.255.255.255
permit tcp any 128.0.0.0 31.255.255.255 eq ssl
permit tcp any 160.0.0.0 7.255.255.255 eq www - 160.0.0.0 -> 167.255.255.255
permit tcp any 160.0.0.0 7.255.255.255 eq ssl
permit tcp any 168.0.0.0 3.255.255.255 eq www - 168.0.0.0 -> 171.255.255.255
permit tcp any 168.0.0.0 3.255.255.255 eq ssl
permit tcp any 172.0.0.0 0.15.255.255 eq www - 172.0.0.0 -> 172.15.255.255
permit tcp any 172.0.0.0 0.15.255.255 eq ssl
permit tcp any 172.32.0.0 0.31.255.255 eq www - 172.32.0.0 -> 172.63.255.255
permit tcp any 172.32.0.0 0.31.255.255 eq ssl
permit tcp any 172.64.0.0 0.63.255.255 eq www - 172.64.0.0 -> 172.127.255.255
permit tcp any 172.64.0.0 0.63.255.255 eq ssl
permit tcp any 172.128.0.0 0.127.255.255 eq www - 172.128.0.0 172.255.255.255
permit tcp any 172.128.0.0 0.127.255.255 eq ssl
permit tcp any 173.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 eq www - 173.0.0.0 -> 173.255.255.255
permit tcp any 173.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 eq ssl
permit tcp any 174.0.0.0 1.255.255.255 eq www - 174.0.0.0 -> 175.255.255.255
permit tcp any 174.0.0.0 1.255.255.255 eq ssl
permit tcp any 176.0.0.0 15.255.255.255 eq www - 176.0.0.0 -> 191.255.255.255
permit tcp any 176.0.0.0 15.255.255.255 eq ssl
permit tcp any 192.0.0.0 31.255.255.255 eq www - 192.0.0.0 -> 223.255.255.255
permit tcp any 192.0.0.0 31.255.255.255 eq ssl
Like i say no guarantees and i have no idea of what this will do to the switch in terms of CPU etc. but probably worth a try.
Jon

Imac internal router problem

We are using Bell Wimax to connect to the internet and due to their towers being down for 2 weeks, we had lost our internet connection. It is back up and running, however we no longer can connect wirelessly to the computer. I was using the imac as the router and have tried to reestablish a connection, however the other computers can't connect. They recognize and register the signal but won't join in. I have tried to reset the location and then redo the sharing, but again, it did not work.

Welcome to the Apple Discussions!
First off, the folks in the G5 forums may assist you better;
Forum : Using your iMac G5
You might make sure that your Audio MIDI Setup has not been reconfigured. I can't guarantee what is correct for a G5 PPC, just an Intel. The actual setting can be found in Apps/Utilities/Audio MIDI Setup;
1. Audio Devices pane
2. Built-in Output
3. Audio Output
Source = Internal Speakers
Format = 44100.0 Hz 2ch - 24bit

Unable to access some websites since installing new WRT300N Wireless Router

I have just replaced my old Belkin router with the new Linksys WRT300N, all of my connecting devices are Belkin & Linksys PCI or inbuilt Atheros and IntelPro 3945ABG Net on my laptops.
The issue that I have is that since the upgrade a number of sites (yours included) do not connect straight away, I have to refresh the page until it connects, some do not. This is not browser dependant as I have IE7 and Mozilla and the problems occurs in both.
The wirless is setup with DHCP enabled on the first page, any ideas?

Try to update the router's firmware. I heard, the latest firmware on their site should fix it.
Love is just a word".... It has no emotions...only thoughts, imaginations.

Loss of audio after upgrade os x 10.7.5, reset PRAM, SMS, updated software and other recommendations i could find. Master volume sliders inactive in Audio Midi section. Can see sound bar responding it input on line in but is not being internally routed.

Recently upgrade to OS x 10.7.5 resulted in loss of what appears to be internal communication of line in audio, and output. Have tired several remedies including resetting PRAM, SMS, updating all software, multiple Sound and Audio Midi applications adjustments to no avail. Also no audio is recognized on USB mixing board I tried as well, though Audio USB Codec was displayed. THe master volume sliders and other options are greyed out on Audio Midi application whn I try to troubleshoot that. Nothing external will play through computer speakers, but internal sounds and iTunes play normally.I made sure the audio sampling rates were default. Software issue or soundcard/hardware failure.?..Pullin my hair out!

Might be corrupted sound preferences ...
Open the Finder. From the Finder menu bar click Go > Go to Folder
Type or copy paste the following;
/Library/Preferences/Audio
Click Go then move both .plist files from the Audio folder to the Trash.
com.apple.audioDeviceSettings.pllist
com.apple.audio.SystemSettings.plist
Restart your Mac. See if that made a difference ...

Still having some problems with my WRT300N v2 router....

For 6 years or so I have been using a Linksys router and been quite happy with it. As such, it was "natural" for me to look for another. Especially since I have seen the user interface of several of routers for port forwarding, and other settings vital to a good solid gaming connection.
When I first setup the router the firmware was it's default (v2.08) and that is just buggy imho, for anyone connecting more than one computer. The biggest hassle was that the wireless connections could not connect to any of the other computers in the LAN. Although they did, after a long wait, get a DHCP address from my separate DHCP server. FORTUNATELY, the new firmware (v2.17) resolved most, if not all of my local connectivity problems.
I still have one major problem though. This is the IP renewal of the WAN address. My ISP wants that updated every 30 to 60 minutes, so the renewal period is 3600 seconds, or 1 hour. What I recall from the RFC on DHCP is that a client is expected to send renewal requests long before the IP address assignment reaches it expiration "moment". If I remember correctly, this is the time interval T2 (T1 being expiration), and by default T2 == T1 * 0.75.
In other words, all DHCP clients (in this case the WAN side of the router) should be requesting a renewal/refresh of the DHCP address at 75% of the lease period - in my case at 45 minutes. After watching closely for the last 4 hours, I see my game clients lose connection on all my computers, and I see the DHCP renewal take place.
Could someone from Linksys verify when the first requests for renewal get sent out? This is instant death in a MORPH if you are trying to do pvp. Absolutely unworkable.
Thank you for your attention and support.
Michael aka rootvg.
Message Edited by rootvg on 08-14-2007 05:03 AM

Well, after a couple more application crashes on the hour, I swapped my old befw11s4 router in and watched the way it does IP renewal of the WAN IP addresses. Shortly after it reaches the halfway mark, the lease gets renewed.
Anyone notice this behavior with their WRTS300N? No update on DHCP lease til after expiration?

Internal routing

Hi, I'm using a 2.5 intel core i5 iMac running 10.8.4. I use Traktor pro 2 and want to route the record output of traktor into logic. Im trying to use Jack but cannot get the audio into Logic. Can anyone help? Thanks

Do some reading here to get the idea:
https://discussions.apple.com/message/12946606#12946606
This is the basic stuff to make the routing you want, although you'll have to fill in your actors to make it happening!
Cheers!

Wrt300n N router hangs

Hi,
I have just bought the Linksys WRT300N and for the last couple days it was working fine, i'm starting to notice now that it breaks my internet connection. ie; it's all connected and all but when i try going on the internet, i can't. "pages can not be found" etc. sites are unreachable.
what i had to do, was to disconnect the power for a couple seconds, and then connect back. then the net connection seems to come back.
is this something that is happening in a very particular instance, or should i expect it to happen all the time.
m

Try reducing the MTU gragually to about 1200 , you can start at 1492 .

Routing issue with dual Ethernet NICs - Internal/External Configuration under Windows 8.1 - what am I doing wrong ?

I have a PC hosting Windows 8.1, attached to two Networks. One leads to the internet - and uses the private IP address (172.*) the other is purely internal (also using the private address 198.*) but, has no internet connectivity. I'm finding
that if I don't disable my internal NIC, I can't access any internet sites. Is this a bug, or have I not done something correctly.
I have also, a Windows 7 PC, attached to the same Networks, and it exhibits no issues when connecting to either the internet or to internal locations.
(Both are Enterprise builds, though only across a Windows for Workgroups network).
Can anyone tell me what I need to be doing with Windows 8.1 please, to make both internal & external network connectivity work as is the case with Windows 7 ?
I'm only running IPv4, and both Wired Networks have at their respective ends, Routers that support DHCP & NAT. Though the internal Router's external port is not connected to anything.
Thanks in advance...

Hi,
Can you tell me what you have tried so far and how did you set?
Firstly please update all network adapter driver.
After that, do the following:
1. Open the Command Prompt (Admin).
2. Run "Ipconfig /all" to check your nics IP information.
3. Use route command tell the computer which interface you want the packets to leave from.
Assuming Network A is...
10.10.11.0 /24
Router is 10.10.10.1
and Network B is...
10.10.12.0 /24
Router is 10.10.10.2
then use this command:
route add 10.10.11.0 mask 255.255.255.0 10.10.10.1 -p
route add 10.10.12.0 mask 255.255.255.0 10.10.10.2 -p
Hope this helps.
Karen Hu
TechNet Community Support

WRT300n Internal Routing

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for