WRT350N - Storage Feature Performance

Yesterday I purchased the WRT350N. The 'other' gigabit wireless router was $130. The WRT350N was $199. The reason I paid the difference was for the storage access feature. I have an external HD that was connected to a desktop. In the house we use laptops and have our media on this drive. We use the Windows offline files feature to have a current synced copy on our laptops at all times. Also, if the drive was to fail we have copies of the files on our laptops as well. Whenever we connect to the network, the drive automatically syncs.
With this configuration everything works great with that exception that the desktop has to remain on at all times. With the WRT350N I saw an opportunity to use the router instead. By the way, the drive is formatted FAT32.
From the moment I created the share and connected from a PC there were performance issues. The root drive showed up fine. I can see all the files (about 10 folders and a dozen files -- at the root). Once I double-clicked the 'My Music' folder, which contains about 60 folders and 100 files, the display took several minutes.
I thought maybe it was caching the file lists....I don't know. It's a new router. Maybe it would be better the next time I went in. Nope. It is consistently slow. I used the Windows Media Player to search for music files. It won't complete.
While I can still surf the Internet, I can't access the drive at all once it froze. I had to unplug the router.
So.....I spent $69 extra dollars for this functionality. I hope that a firmware upgrade is coming.
(Mod note: Edited for guideline compliance. Thank you.)Message Edited by Vince_02 on 04-28-2007 07:25 AM

Having the same problem. Everything works fine except for the ftp server. I can reach it through my LAN but not from the internet. I wasn't even pingable until I flashed the firmware with the same version a couple times. Now I'm pingable but still no outside access.

Similar Messages

Want to know what is improvement in FILEstram storage feature from SQL SERVER 2008 to SQL SERVER 2014

Hi All ,
want to know what is improvement in FILEstram storage feature from SQL SERVER 2008 to SQL SERVER 2014
Regards,
Manish

Hello Manish,
See
What's New in SQL Server 2012
What's New in SQL Server 2014
Nothing really new around that feature.
Olaf Helper
[ Blog] [ Xing] [ MVP]

What Everyone Should KNow and Linksys Should Advertize About WRT350N Storage Link Limitations

I have spent hours with Linksys online chat trying to get my wrt350N storage link to work as advertised. Basically, I want to hook up a 400gb mybook hard drive and use the networked drive to backup my netwroked computers over the wireless network. While I can write individual files to the networked hard drive, and can copy and paste large folders using windows explorer, I can not use backup programs. The netowrked drive reports incorrect information as to its capicity to "my computer" and always shows up as "read only" while some programs don't seem to mind this, every backup program I have used has problems with this clitch.
After several sessions with linksys and having retuend the router to linksys for a new one, this is what technical support said this morning:
"You: ok so if I have you right, the router's storage link is not guaranteed to work at all with >300gb storage devices, does not work at all with 3rd party backup programs, and does not provide a backup program of its own, is that the bottom line?
Tech Support: Exactly. That's its product limitation."
Just so everyone is clear, Linksys does not gauruntee that storage link works at all with drives greater than 300gb, it is not compatable with 3rd part backup progrmas and does not provide a backup program of its own.
This is independant of ntfs vs fat32 and yes I do have the new firmware 1.03.2 and have it correctly installed (linksys checked all of my settings online).
If I am missing something and there are others out there who are gettnig storage link to work with backup software, I would love to know what I am doing wrong, because 7 different linksys tecnical support people have been unable to tell me.
Since Linksys is unwilling to place these product limitations on their packaging, I thought that potential users deserve to know the limitations of this product.
(Mod note: Post has been edited for guidelines compliance.)Message Edited by primus on 03-04-2007 08:43 PM

sounds like you are in the same boat I was. I bought the WRT350N to use with my macbook pro and attached a 500gig usb drive to it for remote storage. I got nothing but permission problems copying files. The save usb drive worked fine in a dlink storage box. I took mine back and ordered the
Airport Extreme-N
- James

Got problems usuing mass storage feature when upgr...

Hello i recently upgraded to v4.07 but got error with the cable...the mass storage feature basically...what can i do to get along with this problem?
Thanx!

And your phone model is?
Useful links: Phone firmware update | Nokia support site

All-Flash Storage: Accelerated Performance, Yes, but Is It Enterprise-Grade?

August 2015
Explore
All-Flash Vendors Should Meet These Criteria
Here's our checklist to help you evaluate the enterprise-grade capabilities of all-flash storage solutions you may be considering. It helps you assess what you should be most concerned about as you invest in solid-state storage arrays for critical application environments.
Your enterprise should settle for no less.
AFF Enterprise-Grade Checklist
Performance
Audited performance benchmarks
Quality of service
Management Simplicity
Single pane-of-glass management
Seamless scale-out and scale-up
NAS and SAN
Data Protection / Security
Synchronous / asynchronous replication
Secure multi-tenancy
F2D2C integrated data protection
Application Integration
Microsoft, Oracle, SAP, VMware, Citrix
Veeam, Commvault, Veritas, TSM
OpenStack, CloudStack integration
When you've gone through the list, contact your NetApp sales rep or reseller to see if you qualify for our free All Flash FAS try-before-you-buy offer—it's a risk-free way to get a taste of what true enterprise-grade, all-flash storage has to offer.
Mike McNamara
Senior Manager, Product Marketing
NetApp
Sure, high performance and low latency matter. Business competition—relentless 24/7/365—demands that you coax maximum speed and responsiveness from key business operations. Faster time to market translates to greater customer satisfaction and competitive advantage.
That's why your forward-looking IT peers increasingly embrace all-flash storage: By speeding performance and reducing latency, flash accelerates business value—driving revenue, enhancing the customer experience, and reducing costs through consolidation.
But when it comes to all-flash storage solutions today, high performance and low latency are not enough. Your enterprise needs more.
Turn on a Dime—Without Compromise
In an enterprise context, "agility" refers to how well and rapidly a company can adapt to market and environmental changes—and do it in productive, cost-effective ways. Robust data management and enterprise-grade capabilities are key to staying on top of today's dynamic marketplace.
Accordingly, astute IT bosses are asking questions around all-flash storage solutions: How available is my data? How much flexibility do I have to move that data over its lifecycle? What about data protection? Does the solution offer native support for cloud?
In essence, they're saying, "Okay, Mr. Storage Vendor, you can accelerate my performance and reduce my latency. But can you wrap that in the enterprise-grade package that I need to run my business?"
NetApp® All Flash FAS (AFF) answers all these questions. It's an enterprise-grade storage solution.
Figure 1) Powered by clustered Data ONTAP, All Flash FAS is built for virtualized, shared environments requiring high performance plus robust data management.
Source: NetApp, 2015
Powered by Clustered Data ONTAP
Driving All Flash FAS is NetApp clustered Data ONTAP®, the #1 storage operating system (OS).* It's the foundation of the Data Fabric, our vision for the future of data management. We architected Data ONTAP to have enterprise-grade, unified, scale-out capabilities that deliver nondisruptive operations, storage and operational efficiency, and scalability over the lifetime of the system. Data ONTAP is the basis for virtualized shared storage infrastructures.
Backed by Data ONTAP FlashEssentials, AFF simplifies flash deployment, eliminates flash silos, accelerates database performance with 20x faster response times, and reduces your total cost of ownership. Enhanced native capabilities of the OS bring integrated inline efficiencies to AFF. These include newly enhanced compression, inline zero-block and always-on deduplication for 5x–10x average space savings.
All Flash FAS employs the Data ONTAP log-structured file system WAFL® (Write Anywhere File Layout). It's optimized for flash media to minimize latency, reduce wear, and maximize usable capacity. The solution's optimized write, read, and parallel processing results in consistent submillisecond latency and high performance.
Figure 2) Flash-optimized write architecture reduces latency and increases the longevity of SSDs.
Source: NetApp, 2015
Flash-to-Disk Agility
All Flash FAS supports live workload migration between flash and hard disk drive (HDD) tiers—on premises or in the cloud. As data characteristics and application environments change, data that's no longer performance-driven doesn't need to be in flash. All Flash FAS gives you the flexibility to move that data nondisruptively within the same cluster to other nodes that are just spinning media for cost-effective backup or archival for example—quickly and easily.
Flash-to-Cloud Data Protection
NetApp is the first all-flash system to support integrated snapshots and cloning to a software instance running on Amazon Web Services. You can move your data securely across your choice of clouds—enabled by Cloud ONTAP™ and NetApp Private Storage for Cloud.
Enterprise-grade Data Protection Delivers Resiliency
Industry-leading, advanced data protection technologies in AFF improve your resiliency. Core features include RAID DP, in-core checksums, lost write protection, read-after write verification, and media scans that verify that data written to the solid state drive (SSD) is written correctly and regenerated.
For enterprise-grade data availability, NetApp MetroCluster™ is the only high-availability and disaster recovery software integrated into an all-flash array. With MetroCluster, you recover from failures with zero data loss, maintaining continuous data availability for mission-critical applications—at half the cost and complexity of competitive solutions. All Flash FAS with MetroCluster is one of the only all-flash arrays that supports integrated synchronous mirroring with a single management view. And, according to Forrester Research estimates, organizations can achieve up to 143% return on investment (ROI) through MetroCluster.
NetApp SnapMirror® software replicates to any type of FAS system—all flash, hybrid, or HDD, on premises or in the cloud—reducing overall system costs.
Enhancements that improve SSD durability and life include metadata and user data that are coalesced in memory before being destaged intelligently to the SSD subsystem. This ability minimizes wear by reducing the amount of writes dispatched to the SSDs. Data is never overwritten in place and writes are striped across multiple SSDs, resulting in more even wear.
Furthermore, where other storage vendors compete, we partner. One road leads to vendor lock-in; the other leads to interoperability. Through strong data protection partnerships, All Flash FAS delivers integrated support for Veeam, Commvault, Veritas, and Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) solutions.
Leading Application Integration Covers All the Bases
Deep application integration sets All Flash FAS apart from other all-flash solutions on the market today.
Delivering tight assimilation with Oracle, Microsoft SQL Server, SAP, Citrix, VMware, and OpenStack and CloudStack environments, AFF streamlines your management and data protection chores—saving you time and cycles. Application-consistent backup and recovery is integrated and automated.
Storage Management Made Easy
All Flash FAS includes the NetApp OnCommand® family of management software for automated tools that further simplify management of storage operations. Setting up and configuring AFF typically takes less than 15 minutes leveraging preconfigured systems for SAN deployments. OnCommand Workflow Automation automates common storage tasks such as provisioning and data protection for environments such as Microsoft SQL Server and Oracle.
To optimize storage for peak performance and to keep everything running smoothly, OnCommand Performance Manager automatically monitors and analyzes performance. It's an integrated component of OnCommand Unified Manager.
With multiprotocol support—Fibre Channel (FC), FCoE, iSCSI, NFS, pNFS, CIFS/SMB—AFF delivers a common look and feel across your entire heterogeneous enterprise. Network-attached storage (NAS) is especially useful for VDI workloads typical in Citrix XenDesktop and VMware Horizon View installations.
The Need for Speed
All Flash FAS accelerated performance enables server consolidation and can reduce database license costs by 50%.
In a recent SPC-1 benchmark, the All Flash FAS8080EX delivered 685,000 SPC-1 IOPS, ranking in the top 5. For database environments, AFF delivers 309K IOPS at 1ms latency for Oracle database 12c and 280K IOPS at 1ms latency for Microsoft SQL Server. VDI performance is equally impressive with 160K IOPS at ~1ms latency (80% write, 20% read).
Like every FAS controller, AFF supports all the same protocols and features as FAS hybrid arrays. This includes the ability to scale up and out to 8 nodes for FC, or 24 nodes for NAS. With multi-tenancy built in and quality of service to protect important workloads, All Flash FAS is more than capable of meeting the demands of enterprise IT—scaling up to 384TB all-flash capacity per high availability (HA) pair or up to 5PB all-flash capacity in a cluster.
Free Try Before You Buy
If you're evaluating all-flash storage arrays for your enterprise, you'll want to consider the questions in the All Flash Array Checklist for Enterprise Buyers (see sidebar, "All-Flash Vendors Should Meet These Criteria"). Compare NetApp AFF against all-flash storage solutions other vendors are offering. If their solutions don't meet these criteria, you will end up setting up a storage silo with all of the management challenges involved.
NetApp is currently offering a free All Flash FAS trial for qualified enterprises. It's a risk-free way to put all-flash storage performance with enterprise-grade capabilities through its paces in your own environment. Contact your NetApp sales rep or reseller to find out more
The NetApp AFF8000 product line delivers on all the elements in the checklist. Because yes, high performance and low latency matter—but for enterprise IT mavens, that's just the beginning.
*IDC Worldwide Quarterly Disk Storage Systems Tracker 2015 Q1, June 2015 (Open Networked Disk Storage Systems revenue)
Mike McNamara, senior manager of product marketing at NetApp, has 25 years of storage and data management marketing experience. Prior to NetApp, Mike worked at Adaptec, EMC, and HP. He helped lead the launch of the industry's first unified scale-out storage system, iSCSI and SAS storage system, and Fibre Channel storage system. Mike is a former marketing chairperson for the Fibre Channel Industry Association, and current member of the Ethernet Technology Summit Conference Advisory Board and the Ethernet Alliance. He frequently contributes to industry journals and speaks at industry events.
Quick Links
Tech OnTap Community
Archive
PDF

Saluting Mike, Would you please alsoa dvice how many enterprise users are running Epic on AFF8K? Tks by Henry PAN

Disable access to the cloud storage feature for Creative Cloud for Teams?

Is it possible to disable access to Creative Cloud Files when using Creative Cloud software for Teams/Volume Licensing customers? We're considering moving to Creative Cloud subscriptsions instead of traditional licensing and the ability to turn this feature off would be the easiest way to comply with our company's security requirments.
Thanks.

BrickyB, This is what the Creative Cloud FAQ says,
My organization wants to block access to certain services, such as storage and access to community features, available through Creative Cloud. Is this possible?
Yes, your IT administrators can block users from accessing the online services. The online services and their URLs are listed here.
As an administrator, you will also be able to deploy Creative Cloud desktop applications independent of the cloud-based services using the Creative Cloud Packager. The Creative Cloud Packager is available through Creative Cloud for teams.
Check this for more details.
http://www.adobe.com/products/creativecloud/faq.html

WRT350N Storage Password Access in Vista

This might be a known problem 'cause I saw at least one other thread where this was mentioned.
I have a USB drive connected to my WRT350N and a share setup on the router. I can mount the drive locally via "Map Network Drive" and \\192.168.1.1\MyDrive and I can even do it across the WAN using the routers WAN IP. When the drive is mapped I get a password dialog and can mount the drive using user "Guest" with no password.
My problem is that I can't get Vista to accept the passwords for any other accounts than the guest account. I get a "Logon Unsuccessful" message. This includes the admin account. No a big problem for my local network since I can mount drives under the guest account and grant guest access to all the drives fo RW, but not wise for accessing my data across the internet.
Anyone have any ideas - Is this a Vista thing or something that will need to wait for Firmware 2.0 for the WRT350N?
Thanks!
Rob

I have the same logon problem using Vista Home Premium edition.
The is no "secpol.msc" file to edit. Any other options?
````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
EquallyWrong solved the problem! Thank you!
For anyone else with Vista and WRT350N w/ storage password issues:
http://forums.linksys.com/linksys/view_profile?user.id=61782
Message Edited by larogar on 07-24-2007 04:53 PM

ASM, rebalancing, 3rd party storage and performance

Hi all, I have some questions for the storage experts and I need your opinion about:
1. Which type of ASM is better for the rebalancing perspective (and obviously the performance perspective), but considering the availability as well: Unprotected, 2-way (normal) or 3-way (high)? I know 3-way is the worst because we have to multiply by 3 the space of the database, but has great availability. Which of these do you use in your company?
2. If someone is using EMC/Fujitsu/Hitachi, do you use Unprotected or 2-way (normal) in ASM?
3. Which type of rebalancing (from zero to 11) is the best to use, considering the overall performance , I mean, when you have to add a new disk, ASm will perform the rebalancing.
4. Which is better to use: ASM Cluster File System or Oracle Cluster File System ?
Thanks.

977623 wrote:
1. Which type of ASM is better for the rebalancing perspective (and obviously the performance perspective), but considering the availability as well: Unprotected, 2-way (normal) or 3-way (high)? I know 3-way is the worst because we have to multiply by 3 the space of the database, but has great availability. Which of these do you use in your company?Wrong question IMO. You do not choose normal or high redundancy based on which rebalances the fastest. You make that choice wrt to redundancy and high availability.
The best in this respect is high redundancy. 3 storage servers. Fully redundant I/O fabric layer (3+ I/O paths from each server to each and every LUN). Which means you can loose 2 storage arrays and most of your I/O fabric layer (switches and cables). And the storage layer left will still be able to be effectively used for ASM and the RAC database will not even notice that this destruction happened.
However, this best is not always feasible ito existing architecture, budget and so on. So that drives the requirements and needs and what the best is to meet that.
2. If someone is using EMC/Fujitsu/Hitachi, do you use Unprotected or 2-way (normal) in ASM?That again depends on redundancy levels. If the SAN provides a RAID5 or RAID10 LUN, should you mirror it?
This may makes sense if you have 2 SANS. And with each SAN implementing RAID5, you mirror (via ASM) across SANs.
It makes less sense if you use ASM to mirror (on the same SAN) 2 RAID5 LUNs.
You also may have no choice. For example, migrating a high redundancy diskgroup from a storage server (no redundancy by server), to a SAN (RAID5/10 redundancy by SAN). When migrating ASM diskgroups, you cannot reduce redundancy. You cannot make a high redundancy diskgroup a normal redundancy diskgroup. Or a normal one, an externally redundant diskgroup.
In such a case you normal/high redundancy diskgroup on the new SAN (with its RAID5/10 LUNs), still need its own mirrors in ASM.
3. Which type of rebalancing (from zero to 11) is the best to use, considering the overall performance , I mean, when you have to add a new disk, ASm will perform the rebalancing.How busy is the I/O layer? What production processing is running? How will this be impacted by using power 11? How soon does the old (dropped) disks need to be physically decommissioned? Etc.
There is no single correct answer to what load balancing power setting to use.
4. Which is better to use: ASM Cluster File System or Oracle Cluster File System ?For what purpose?
For RAC database purposes only? ACFS. As OCFS adds another set of kernel drivers, kernel services, and another Interconnect (ocfs needs its own IP Interconnect that is typically run over the public IP network of the cluster, and that can be/should be run over the private IP network of the cluster).
Why add more moving parts (ocfs) when ACFS is available?
Then again - why use ACFS when you are not running Grid Infrastructure? Or why makes your cluster file system dependent on Grid/CRS to be running (with ASM), when OCFS's moving parts are significantly fewer and less complex?
As with most things in Information Technology - there is no overall "best". The "best" depends on a number of factors, and the business requirements that need to be met.

WRT350N STorage

I have bought myself a WRT350N - my old wireless AP had eventually given up the ghost - and a 1TB HD to connect as storage... but now I discover that has been formatted by the Linksys as FAT32 (is that possible - 930 GB on FAT32?) and that all files have the system and archive bits set when copied. This makes it totally useless. You can't copy anything on top. Robocopy won't copy anything at all. How does one actually contact Linksys with a problem? Is the router braindead? Rgds Martin
(Edited post for guideline compliance. Thanks!)
Message Edited by JOHNDOE_06 on 11-26-2007 07:16 AM

Hunny I don't think they have email support anymore and this is a user to user community forum FYI. It will get everything to that format if you choose to, I think you also pressed the claim function on router management for this to happen.
"Claim. For a blank disk, click the Claim button to create a partition that will be formatted as FAT32".
And so that's what probably happened in your case. So it is possible if you formatted that large drive on the device. You can choose otherwise if you had this formatted previously on NTFS (is that what you prefer to have it??). as it says "If a formatted disk is attached to the Router, the Partition, File System, Total Space, and Free Space columns describe the partition(s) of the disk."
which means it will and can support both file formats...got me dandy file reader software here to read whatever so I think you should do the same if you wish to... google for it and its freeware. If you want the latter then get that formatted before you have that be recognized on the storage router... the answer is really your preferred partitions also..
You can call support nowadays, check the main site for that
Message Edited by ANGELSandDEMONS on 11-28-2007 12:36 PM

Wrt350n - storage issue

I upgraded my WRT350N to 1.03.7 as I added a WD 500GB USB 2.0 drive (NTFS formated). The problem arises when a workstation attached to the drive and has not been authenticated (i.e. home XP Pro PC has no password authentication, I attach (net use n: ...) the storage device. I then setup the screen saver on the PC to use pictures referencing the new network drive. So far okay, but then the PC reboots. The network drive has not been authenticated. PC locks (only Alt-Ctl-Del seems to work to get out of the lockup) as does the WRT350N (the router passes traffic, but can not be administered, and storage can not be accessed - must be power reset to fix). Any suggestions other than add a password to my home PC?

I was running the beta fw version. Problem occurred when I upgraded/downgraded (not sure which based on forum posts) to the latest production version 1.03.7. Maybe I should go back to the beta ver.

WRT350N Storage problem

Using WRT350N with Firmware 1.03.2.
I can't detect any USB storage device attached to the router.
I have tried numerous USB Storage devices and numerous file systems (including FAT32), but I can not get the router to recognize these drives.
the Mass Storage devices that I use are in various sizes (128MB, 64MB, 160GB).
I even formatted the disks to get them blank.
to observe the problem:
If I go to the "Storage" Tab and "Disk" sub-tab, all I can see is:
Next to "Disk detail" i see the message "There are currently no available disks"
next to "Erase Disk" i see the message "No disks are currently defined"
what can be done to fix this?

Well try upgrading the firmware of the router & keep on holding tightly
the reset button in such a way that power light is blinking on the
router & then do a complete network power cycle i.e., unplug the power
cables from the modem & from the router & then plug in the power cable
to the modem first once all the lights are solid green you could plug
in the power cable to the router & then check using the administrative login it will definately work!!

WRT350n storage link itunes problem

There is not enough room on "\\Linksyswrt350n\all_partitions" to copy all of the requested files. iTunes will copy as many files as possible. I know for a fact that I have plenty of room on the drive. It seems itunes is having trouble getting access to the drive... not sure how to fix this

I just bought the wrt350n. have not hooked it up yet. I plan on putting a mybook 750gb drive on the storage link and putting my itunes library on it. how difficult is this?

WRT610N STORAGE LINK PERFORMANCE

hi,
i wonder 610n data transfer performance by mbyte/s with connected Ntfs HDs.
pls share your experiences, how much mb read/write speed ,did u see with wireless connection between usb hd on router-notebook(with N wireless).
thnx

Wireless computer to storage will work on average of 2-3 Mbps/sec.

WRT350N Storage failures

I'm using a WRT350N (v1.03.2) with a Western Digital My Book Premium 320Gb Dual Interface (USB and Firewire). I'm having several troubles and wondered if anyone had gotten better results.
The router is working fine, and wired connections are rock solid. The wireless is flaky but more up then down since I've set it into G only mode. I'm working the wireless issues separately and will discuss this later after I have more data.
The storage is a problem though. I connected the drive as formatted from WD (FAT32) and was able to see the drive, and share the partition as "Media". Connections will work great for a little while. But after copying several large files to the drive it becomes unresponsive. The router still functions, but access to the share will hang and timeout. I can access the web interface but if I click on the "Storage" tab the application will lock up and never display the Storage page.
I've tested the drive separately on my Mac and Windows systems with no problems, I can even use the firewire interface while the router is struggling to access the USB.
If I reboot the router it will come back for a little while, but then fails again pretty quickly.
I am pretty happy with the hardware, but I think the firmware needs a little work, and hope that some of the kinks are worked out of the firmware soon.
Does anyone have positive experience using the WRT350N to serve a network share?
Thanks,
D

I have had the EXACT same issue and experience with the WRT350N (v1.03.2), it locks up when I copy or read large files from the USB attached storage drive. I have used three different drive which all work fine when plugged directly into a USB 2.0 port.
Is there a firmware fix? This is pretty pathetic as it renders the USB storage useless for me. I guess I will return the WRT350N (v1.03.2) router.
.Chirs

WRT350N Storage Link usage?

Just bought the router and set it up. Works fine for what I had replaced before (G speed). Now I tried to enable the Storage Link. Put a 2GB Flash drive in the unit. It is on, and on the webpage I can see it. However, I can't see it via the LAN? I have Network Magic to 'manage' my network, and it can't see it? However, a NEW VIEW from my computer reports this... ____________ c:\>net view Server Name Remark ---------------------------------------- \\IRVS Gen5 \\LARAINE-HP \\LINKSYSWRT350N LinksysWRT350N The command completed successfully. ------------ The last UNC is the flash drive. Trying to view it reports this : c:\>net view \\LINKSYSWRT350N System error 5 has occurred. Access is denied. I've tried ALL sorts of permissions and group creations. Still noting will allow me to look at it. Network Magic doesn't even see the device as a SHARE? Suggestions?
Thanks,
Irv S.

Yes, figured that out. The reason it didn't work before was that I had the Router settings open in the Web Browser and any other attempts to reach 192.168.1.1 didn't ask for a UID and P/W, just opened the main router page. Working now though. Thanks, Irv S.
Thanks,
Irv S.

WRT350N - Storage Feature Performance

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for