Wrt400n has problems with port forwarding

I have forwarded port 80 on my router and used a port forwarding tool to check to see if the port is open. I select both and it tells me the UDP is open, but not the TCP. Any idea why?? Thanks so much. I have also used the same tool to check ports 3074, 88 and 53. These ports are required for Xbox Live and I'm having an issue connecting. it connect to the internet fine, but it appears this port may be the problem. Please advise.

Who is your ISP..?
Port no 80 is by default on the router.You do not have to open the port 80.For x-box open the port 53 and 3074.Also,under the Administration tab,disable the UPnP and Uncheck Filter Filter Anonymous Internet Requests under Security tab...Reduce the MTU value to 1365 under the setup tab.It should work now..Make sure while doing the port forwarding,you are providing the correct ip address on the router as well on the X-Box.
However,if your ISP is DSL then,convert the modem into the bridge mode to make your x-box working.

Similar Messages

HELP!! asa 5505 8.4(5) problem with port forwarding-smtp

Hi I am having a big problem with port forwarding on my asa. I am trying to forward smtp through the asa to my mail server.
my mail server ip is 10.0.0.2 and my outside interface is 80.80.80.80 , the ASA is setup with pppoe (I get internet access no problem and that seems fine)
When I run a trace i get "(ACL-Drop) - flow is deied by configured rule"
below is my config file , any help would be appreciated
Result of the command: "show running-config"
: Saved
ASA Version 8.4(5)
hostname ciscoasa
domain-name domain.local
enable password mXa5sNUu4rCZ.t5y encrypted
passwd 2KFQnbNIdI.2KYOU encrypted
names
interface Ethernet0/0
switchport access vlan 2
interface Ethernet0/1
interface Ethernet0/2
interface Ethernet0/3
interface Ethernet0/4
interface Ethernet0/5
interface Ethernet0/6
interface Ethernet0/7
interface Vlan1
nameif inside
security-level 100
ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
interface Vlan2
nameif outside
security-level 0
pppoe client vpdn group ISPDsl
ip address 80.80.80.80 255.255.255.255 pppoe setroute
ftp mode passive
dns server-group DefaultDNS
domain-name domain.local
same-security-traffic permit intra-interface
object network obj_any
subnet 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
object network Server_SMTP
host 10.0.0.2
access-list outside_access_in extended permit tcp any object server_SMTP eq smtp
pager lines 24
logging asdm informational
mtu inside 1500
mtu outside 1500
icmp unreachable rate-limit 1 burst-size 1
no asdm history enable
arp timeout 14400
no arp permit-nonconnected
object network obj_any
nat (inside,outside) dynamic interface
object network server_SMTP
nat (inside,outside) static interface service tcp smtp smtp
nat (inside,outside) after-auto source dynamic any interface
access-group outside_access_in in interface outside
timeout xlate 3:00:00
timeout pat-xlate 0:00:30
timeout conn 1:00:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 icmp 0:00:02
timeout sunrpc 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00 h225 1:00:00 mgcp 0:05:00 mgcp-pat 0:05:00
timeout sip 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00 sip-invite 0:03:00 sip-disconnect 0:02:00
timeout sip-provisional-media 0:02:00 uauth 0:05:00 absolute
timeout tcp-proxy-reassembly 0:01:00
timeout floating-conn 0:00:00
dynamic-access-policy-record DfltAccessPolicy
user-identity default-domain LOCAL
http server enable
http 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 inside
no snmp-server location
no snmp-server contact
snmp-server enable traps snmp authentication linkup linkdown coldstart warmstart
telnet timeout 5
ssh timeout 5
ssh key-exchange group dh-group1-sha1
console timeout 0
vpdn group ISP request dialout pppoe
vpdn group ISP localname [email protected]
vpdn group ISP ppp authentication chap
vpdn username [email protected] password *****
dhcpd auto_config outside
threat-detection basic-threat
threat-detection statistics access-list
no threat-detection statistics tcp-intercept
webvpn
class-map inspection_default
match default-inspection-traffic
policy-map type inspect dns preset_dns_map
parameters
message-length maximum client auto
message-length maximum 512
policy-map global_policy
class inspection_default
inspect dns preset_dns_map
inspect ftp
inspect h323 h225
inspect h323 ras
inspect rsh
inspect rtsp
inspect sqlnet
inspect skinny
inspect sunrpc
inspect xdmcp
inspect sip
inspect netbios
inspect tftp
inspect ip-options
service-policy global_policy global
prompt hostname context
no call-home reporting anonymous
Cryptochecksum:c5570d7ddffd46c528a76e515e65f366
: end

Hi Jennifer
I have removed that nat line as suggested but still no joy.
here is my current config
Result of the command: "show running-config"
: Saved
ASA Version 8.4(5)
hostname ciscoasa
domain-name domain.local
enable password mXa5sNUu4rCZ.t5y encrypted
passwd 2KFQnbNIdI.2KYOU encrypted
names
interface Ethernet0/0
switchport access vlan 2
interface Ethernet0/1
interface Ethernet0/2
interface Ethernet0/3
interface Ethernet0/4
interface Ethernet0/5
interface Ethernet0/6
interface Ethernet0/7
interface Vlan1
nameif inside
security-level 100
ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
interface Vlan2
nameif outside
security-level 0
pppoe client vpdn group ISP
ip address 80.80.80.80 255.255.255.255 pppoe setroute
ftp mode passive
dns server-group DefaultDNS
domain-name domain.local
same-security-traffic permit intra-interface
object network obj_any
subnet 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
object network Server_Mail
host 10.0.0.2
access-list outside_access_in extended permit tcp any object Server_Mail eq smtp
pager lines 24
logging asdm informational
mtu inside 1500
mtu outside 1500
icmp unreachable rate-limit 1 burst-size 1
no asdm history enable
arp timeout 14400
no arp permit-nonconnected
object network obj_any
nat (inside,outside) dynamic interface
object network Server_Mail
nat (inside,outside) static interface service tcp smtp smtp
access-group outside_access_in in interface outside
timeout xlate 3:00:00
timeout pat-xlate 0:00:30
timeout conn 1:00:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 icmp 0:00:02
timeout sunrpc 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00 h225 1:00:00 mgcp 0:05:00 mgcp-pat 0:05:00
timeout sip 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00 sip-invite 0:03:00 sip-disconnect 0:02:00
timeout sip-provisional-media 0:02:00 uauth 0:05:00 absolute
timeout tcp-proxy-reassembly 0:01:00
timeout floating-conn 0:00:00
dynamic-access-policy-record DfltAccessPolicy
user-identity default-domain LOCAL
http server enable
http 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 inside
no snmp-server location
no snmp-server contact
snmp-server enable traps snmp authentication linkup linkdown coldstart warmstart
telnet timeout 5
ssh timeout 5
ssh key-exchange group dh-group1-sha1
console timeout 0
vpdn group ISP request dialout pppoe
vpdn group ISP localname [email protected]
vpdn group ISP ppp authentication chap
vpdn username [email protected] password *****
dhcpd auto_config outside
threat-detection basic-threat
threat-detection statistics access-list
no threat-detection statistics tcp-intercept
webvpn
class-map inspection_default
match default-inspection-traffic
policy-map type inspect dns preset_dns_map
parameters
message-length maximum client auto
message-length maximum 512
policy-map global_policy
class inspection_default
inspect dns preset_dns_map
inspect ftp
inspect h323 h225
inspect h323 ras
inspect rsh
inspect rtsp
inspect esmtp
inspect sqlnet
inspect skinny
inspect sunrpc
inspect xdmcp
inspect sip
inspect netbios
inspect tftp
inspect ip-options
service-policy global_policy global
prompt hostname context
no call-home reporting anonymous
Cryptochecksum:f3bd954d1f9499595aab4f9da8c15795
: end
also here is the packet trace
and my acl
Thanks

Problem with Port Forwarding in WRT320N

Good day.
I have a web-server and Internet-radio translator to local network of my provider. And I found a problem with Port Forwarding. I'm trying to setup 80 & 8000 ports to forward. And it's working but only for Internet, without provider's local network. My web-server isn't accessible in local network and radio-translator too.
So is it possible to forward ports absolutely - for any type of connections?
P.S. DMZ is working like Port Forwarding.

If you ask questions you have to mention that you have an PPTP connection to the internet and another network directly on the internet port. Otherwise noone will really understand your question as it is a very unusual setup.
Your setup is not one really supported by the router. You are lucky that it works but don't expect too much. Port forwarding only the internet connection. If you use PPTP the network on the internet port is basically hidden. Using that local network on the internet port is not supported.
The DMZ host is the IP address to which all ports are forwarded to which are not forwarded otherwise. The same restriction applies here.
I would recommend to ask your ISP which router they recommend for their internet connection. I think most/all Linksys routers and many other brand's consumer routers won't really support a setup like yours...

Problem with Port Forwarding (when PPTP is up) in WRT-160N

Hi, everybody!
I'm looking for some help with Port Forwarding in my new router from Linksys. I've bought the router afew daysago, and was badly surprised when I found out that there is DD-WRT firmware is installed in it (the router was 100% NEW when I've purchased it). I have downloaded the latest original Linksys firmware file and successfully flashed it.
But I still have problem (same I had on DD-WRT firmware too) with port forwarding for my DC++ and Vuze (app for torrents): I've written port forward for ports 49151 (for Vuze) and 4000 (for DC++) to be forwarded to my desktop computer (IP 192.168.1.201) -- I've seen a post at this forum, that there could be a problem, if you forward to an IP, which is inside DHCP local zone, so I've forwarded it to .201 IP (my local DHCPzone is 192.168.1.100 - .149). But forwardind doesn't work ((
What's wrong?
My configuration:
Router IP: 192.168.1.1
PPTP (I've got it from my ISP)
IP address: 192.168.226.127
Default Gateway: 192.168.226.2
DNS 1: 192.168.1.1
DNS 2 & 3: 0.0.0.0
PPTP Server IP Address: 192.168.226.2
Username: ****
Password: ****
Single Port Forwarding:
Application name     External port     Internal port     Protocol     To IP address     Enabled
Vuze 49151 49151 Both 192.168.1.201    Checked
DC    4000 4000            Both           192.168.1.201 Checked
Solved!
Go to Solution.

As you have mentioned in your post that your ISP has provided you a PPTP connection with an IP address: 192.x.x.x. The IP address which is provided to you by your ISP is in a Private Range, and if you try to forward any ports on your router it will not work, as your ISP modem will block that port. So you need to get a Public IP address from your ISP.
As you are getting Private IP from your ISP, so this connection is called as NAT behind NAT, and your Modem is acting like a Router.
So now you have 2 options, get the Public IP address from your ISP or change the connection type.

Problem with Port Forwarding - Password.

Hello,
I have a LINKSYS router, model BEFW11S4 v4 and its firmware is version 1.52.02
My problem is that neither can I do Port Forwarding nor Port Triggering, because when I make the changes I need and press "Save Changes", it asks me for the username and password again. I write them again, but this time it does not accept them.
I have tested it with 2 laptops connected to the router wired the first time and wireless other times.
What should I do?
Thank you in advance.

Normally, you cannot "see your modem" in your network. This is because a modem does not have an IP address. A modem simply converts one signal (ADSL, DSL, or cable) into another signal which is an ethernet signal.
However, some devices that people call "modems" are actually "modem-routers". In this case your "modem-router" probably does have an IP address. If your system is set up correctly, you can "see" a "modem-router" that has an IP address, but it is not part of your LAN (local area network). It is on a another subnet.
The ethernet port of the modem should be wired to the "Internet" port on the BEFW11S4. Do not connect the modem to any other port on the router.
Maybe we need to back up a step or two here. I have always assumed that you were able to get a properly working wired Internet connection through your BEFW11S4. Is that correct?
What is the make and model of your modem?
Who is your ISP?
Also, when you set up your router, leave the username blank.   Do not try to add a user name. Change the password to something unique. Do not use the password default "admin"   (with no quotes).
Since you are still having problems, please use the following protocol to reset your router to factory defaults:
1)  Power down all computers, the router, and the modem, and unplug them from the wall.
2) Disconnect all wires from the router.
3) Power up the router and allow it to fully boot (1-2 minutes).
4)  Press and hold the reset button for 30 seconds, then release it, then let the router reset and reboot (2-3 minutes).
5) Power down the router.
6) Connect one computer by wire to port 1 on the router (NOT to the internet port).
7) Power up the router and allow it to fully boot (1-2 minutes).
8) Power up the computer (if the computer has a wireless card, make sure it is off).
9) Try to ping the router. To do this, click the "Start" button > All Programs > Accessories > Command Prompt. A black DOS box will appear. Enter the following: "ping 192.168.1.1" (no quotes), and hit the Enter key.  You will see 3 or 4 lines that start either with "Reply from ... " or "Request timed out."   If you see "Reply from ...", your computer has found your router.
10) Open your browser and point it to 192.168.1.1. This will take you to your router's login page. Leave the user name blank, and in the password field, enter "admin" (with no quotes). This will take you to your router setup page. Note the version number of your firmware (usually listed near upper right corner of screen). Exit your browser.
If you get this far without problems, try the setup disk (or setup the router manually, if you prefer), and see if you can get your router setup and working.
If you cannot get "Reply from ..." in step 9 above, your router is dead.
If you get a reply in step 9, but cannot complete step 10, then either your router is dead or the firmware is corrupt. In this case, use the Linksys tftp.exe program to try to reload your router with the latest firmware. After reloading the firmware, repeat the above procedure starting with step 1.
If you have problems, report back the results of steps 9 and 10. Also, if you get any error messages, copy them exactly and report back.
Message Edited by toomanydonuts on 04-14-200705:19 PM

Problems with Port Forwarding for RDP in WebVPN

Hi,
I'm hoping somebody can help me solve this problem that's been bugging for weeks. We recently implemented a double-layer firewall architecture. Before that, our users can access RDP via port forwarding on WebVPN or the Cisco VPN client without any problems.
After we implemented the double-layer firewall architecture, users who are going through the WebVPN and port forwarding for RDP began to experience frequent disconnections, slowness or freezing connections. The users who are using the client are fine.
I checked the logs and I'm getting repetitive TCP-O for the port forwarding connections for RDP. Additional information: the FW we installed as a 2nd layer is Netscreen. I've already set the policy on it to Any-Any for the meantime to help in troubleshooting but to no avail.
I hope somebody can help me in sorting this out as I'm kind of confused on the difference between the port-forwarding for RDP via the WebVPN and the normal RDP via the client.

Hi,
I didnt see anything marked with red in the above? (Atleast when I was reading)
I have not really had to deal with Routers at all since we all access control and NAT with firewalls.
But to me it seems you have allowed the traffic to the actual IP address of the internal server rather than the public IP NAT IP address which in this case seems to be configured to use your FastEthernet4 interfaces public IP address.
There also seems to be a Static NAT configured for the same internal host so I am wondering why the Static PAT (Port Forward) is used?
- Jouni

New Customer Experience with Port Forwarding

OK, so my OpenReach Modem and HomeHub 3 were installed last week and all seemed OK at first.
A bit of background:
I'm a seasoned IT guy and have a nice network set up at home that caters for my needs (most of the time).
Without going into too much detail, I have my own DHCP/DNS server and I run a Webserver for personal use.
I have Virgin Broadband - which work most of the time.
I've also just had BT Infinity installed so I should always have Internet access no matter which ISP is having issues.
I was hoping to be able to access my webserver externally from either my BT or Virgin. I didn't think this would be an issue.
It still all works fine through my Virgin connection. I use dynamic DNS (no-ip.org) to get to my server.
On the Virgin Superhub - I have DHCP switched off and all my machines (except one at the moment) get the Virgin router assigned as the Internet gateway (via my own DHCP server).
My test machine gets a the BT HomeHub 3 assigned as the Internet gateway (also from my own DHCP server) and I have switched off DHCP on Home Hub.
Before I move onto my issue, I have to say that the above network setup works flawlessly.
The Virgin Router is on 192.168.0.1, The Home Hub is on 192.168.0.2. (subnet 255.255.255.0)
They are on the same network but because DHCP it switched off on both routers - everything is happy.
I can access my Server from the Internet via my no-ip.org address and it all works great.
The issue:
I thought it would be relatively simple to configure the BT Home Hub 3 to access my server from the Internet.
Hmmm. Port Forwarding seems to be the issue. It just doesn't work reliably enough. Sometimes it works, then sometime it stops working. Right now it's not working.
At first I though it was just me, not configuring it correctly. But no.
Then I started reading this forum and found there are reports of issues with port forwarding going back a year.
I don't know if that a good or bad thing - an issue running that long must be on the verge of getting fixed right?
Or any issue running that long without resolution probably has no simple resolution or just isn't a priority (for BT) maybe.
My Question:
(and I think I already know the answer)
Has anyone got a sure fire way of configuring the HomeHub3 so the port forwarding works?
Or should I just throw in the towel now and buy a Dual Wan Router?
One last note:
This morning my Infinity Broadband Speed dropped from
38Mb down/6Mb Up (measured several times yesterday)
to
0.7Mb down/0.3Mb Up (yes those decimal points are in the right place)
And I haven't got a clue why.
I power cycled the HomeHub and it returned to normal. Does this happen to other people?
Cheers
Graeme.
Graeme

Bullitt wrote:
the port on your network is defined by lan ip address and port number eg 192.168.1.10:80
you cannot forward this outbound port twice
There is no "port on my network" A port is associated with a IP address not a network.
My webserver listens an port 80 - requests from the Internet for http are port forwarded by the router (either BT Homehub or Virgin Superhub) to port 80 at address 192.168.0.5 (in my case).
If I am trying to access my webserver from the Internet, I point my browser at the WAN IP address of my router (again it doesn't matter which one - BT or Virgin) and the router port forwards the request to my Webserver. Each router can do this independently.
"you cannot forward this outbound port twice"
As explained above - It's an inbound port not an outbound port.
I appreciate you are trying to be helpful but just telling me something is not possible without explaining why its not possible doesn't really help me.
As I said before, this was working fine, then it stopped working but only when trying to access my webserver via the BT Router. It still works fine from my Virgin Router. I used WireShark and port mirroring on my switch to prove that the Home Hub as stopped port forwarding inbound traffic to my webserver.
This is a problem with port forwarding on the Homehub, not my network setup. Looking at other posts on this forum - I'd suggest I'm not the only one having problems.
To be honest, it's the least of my problems with the HomeHub right now. I'm far more concerned with the fact that twice today I've had to power cycle it because the throughput has dropped from 38Mbit-down/6Mbit-up to <1Mbit-down/<1Mbit-up. It's a known problem, BT are working on it, yet I still am paying full price for a product that should never had made it out of Beta test.
Graeme

PC Suite has problem with 3120

PC Suite has problem with 3120

I also have detected the problem. It is not any physical malfunction according to me. It occures with my phone when I unplug it and plug it again. Sometimes is useful to change the USB port and afterwards to move back to the previous one. Try it and also try it combined with PC restart. It is a weird problem!?

FYI: MS-7125 BIOS has problem with Hard Drives withNative Command Queuing (NCQ)

For those the have messed my two treads on which both ended up being cause by K8N Neo4 BIOS problem with HD's with NCQ.
Will wonders never cease? MSI Support finally conceded the BIOS has a problem with Hard Drives with NCQ and they have forwarded the problem to their programming department.
However, do not look for any results for above two weeks.
Roger

The problem that this thread has been trying to follow is the incapability of the nVidia RAID Controller with Serial ATA Type 2.5 drives. I know the threads has been hard to follow and part of that is because when I started the thread I had what appeared to be three totally un related problems, but all three were traced down the common problem of the incapability of RAID Controller with Serial ATA Type 2.5 drives.
The title of this thread is MS-7125 BIOS has problem with Hard Drives with Native Command Queuing(NCQ). The statement was true at the time it was written and has nothing to do with memory problems.
Sense the thread was started MSI has fixed the BIOS part of the problem, but we have sense learned the nVidia RAID Controller Command software and its driver has problems too. I have been working MSI Support, they have been using me to test pre-beta BIOS and Drivers soon. Of the testing I have done the pre-beta BIOS worked and the Pre-beta 32-bit driver works. I am assuming that the latest BIOS V1.B had as part of it included fixes was the needed fixes for working with the nVidia RAID Controller as I have test the pre-beta RAID Driver with BIOS Version V1.B as the Raid array function fine windows XP Pro 32-bit Edition. As I have had no communications with MSI support of over a week now I am hoping for a release of 32-bit and 64-bit RAID Drivers. But, nobody should get the hopes up, because through other backdoor sources nVidia is having a hell of a time. One reason for this I heard is that the nVidia RAID Controller is fully software, no hardware other than the electrical drive interfaces. Their problem started when they tried using the old 32-bit code Controller with new 64-bit hardware drivers and now they are having to totally rewrite the controller core in 64-bit code. But, knowing my source, it may all be fiction.
The RAID Array you say is up and running, are the drives full specification SATA 2.5 in other words do the both have 3Gb/s speed and NCQ. If you send me the full part numbers I will check the specifications a get back to you. Because if you have nVidia RAID 0 Array you working you will be the first to have done it and there about 230 people around the world that would like to know how you did it, even MSI, who's pre-beta nVidia RAID Drivers that will work with BIOS V1.B for 32-bit Windows only and nothing for Windows XP 64, would like to know.
Roger

Tp ended with error code 0247 - addtobuffer has problems with data- and/or

Hello Experts,
If you give some idea, it will be greatly appreciated.
This transported issue started coming after power outage, sap system went hard shutdown.
Then we brought up the system. Before that , we do not have this transport issue.
our TMS landscape is
DEV QA-PRD
SED-SEQSEP
DEV is having the TMS domain controller.
FYI:
*At OS level, when we do scp command using root user, it is fine for any TR.
In STMS, while adding TR in SEQ(QA system), we are getting error like this.
Error:
Transport control program tp ended with error code 0247
     Message no. XT200
Diagnosis
     An error occurred when executing a tp command.
       Command:        ADDTOBUFFER SEDK906339 SEQ client010 pf=/us
       Return code:    0247
       Error text:     addtobuffer has problems with data- and/or
       Request:        SEDK906339
System Response
     The function terminates.
Procedure
     Correct the error and execute the command again if necessary.
This is tp version 372.04.71 (release 700, unicode enabled)
Addtobuffer failed for SEDK906339.
Neither datafile nor cofile exist (cofile may also be corrupted).
standard output from tp and from tools called by tp:
tp returncode summary:
TOOLS: Highest return code of single steps was: 0
ERRORS: Highest tp internal error was: 0247

when we do scp using sm69,
SEDADM@DEVSYS:/usr/sap/trans/cofiles/K906339.SED SEQADM@QASYS:/usr/sap/trans/cofiles/.
it throws the error like below,
Host key verification failed.
                                                                                External program terminated with exit code 1
Thanks
Praba

Firefox does not load long images, pixelates images if they are not in their original size, and has problems with thumbnails (in some sites)

Firefox has problems with images.
In sites like deviantART or ImageShack with full-view option, images that are not in full size/thumbnails get slightly pixelated e.g. http://img251.imageshack.us/f/screenshot2tq.jpg/
Long images get completely messed up if full-viewed e.g. http://img689.imageshack.us/f/screenshot5z.jpg/ (though if the file is only big, it loads just fine)
Also, thumbnails in some sites get messed up e.g. http://img201.imageshack.us/f/screenshotyr.jpg/
And in general, Firefox has more 'glitches' like not allowing to add more search engines. It wasn't like that before and I can only assume that it got messed up somewhere with updates, but I'm not really sure.
I've tried cleaning out cache, re-installing Firefox (multiple times) and even downloaded Firefox 4 beta, but the problem remains.
I use Ubuntu.
Does anyone else have similar problems? Or know where the problem lies?

Do you have the latest driver for your graphics display card?
Create a new profile as a test to check if your current profile is causing the problems.
See [[Basic Troubleshooting#Make_a_new_profile|Basic Troubleshooting: Make a new profile]]
If that new profile works then you can transfer some files from the old profile to that new profile (be careful not to copy corrupted files)
See http://kb.mozillazine.org/Transferring_data_to_a_new_profile_-_Firefox

Link Problem with port 2 in WLC 4402

Hi,
I have a problem with port 2 in Wireless Lan Controler 4402. The problem is that the distribution port 2 of the WLC not link with the switch (3750). We receive the WLC and we follow the autostart wizard and we enable LAG. The wizard finish, I restart the system and all works fine. The two distribution ports of WLC, 1 and 2 appears UP and the LAG works correctly. After this we upgrade the firmware of the WLC to the version AIR-WLC4400-k9-6-0-182-0.aes and we restart the system again but at this time port 2 does not link and port 1 link OK. We do not know the reason why port 2 doesn´t link? Could you help me ?
Thank in advance.
Regards.

Does it properly refuse authentication ? Or does the login page stop appearing or something ?
There was a bug with the webauth dying under heavy load, regardless of number of identical accounts used.
One good way for you to check would be, when problem occurs, to create a second backup guest user and see if that would start working. If it doesn't, the account is not the problem.
I'm not aware of any maximum of usage of the same account.
Which 4.2 exactly are you running ?

Problem with call forwarding. Calls can not be forwarded for incoming external calls

Hi Everybody, how are you?
I have a problem with call forwarding. Everything was fine but now is not working.
In the reception of an office, the receptionist activate the call forward option to an internal extension. If somebody, internal in the office, call to the reception, the call is forwarding to the extension configured. But if I call from the outside (in example, from my cellphone) the call is not forwarded to the extension configured and continue ringing in the reception phone. Why this behavior? Any idea?
If you know something please tell me.
Thanks. Best regards.
Andres Collazos.

I encounter a similar problem with 9.1.1.
My problem is link to this bug ID : CSCtq10477.
Mathieu

Pdf reader X has problems with small pdf and printer with post script driver

Hi friends.
I have installed new Reader X and then i saw that, when i print a very small pdf with about 50 kb and i print it on a Laserjet 4000 printer the printer has problem with the amount of data that reader 10 produces.
When i install a Postscript driver for the printer my computer makes up to 3.5MB printer data from a 50kb pdf.
When i install a PCL driver for the printer my computer makes only 350kb from the same 50kb pdf file!!!!
When i install Reader 9.3 the 50kb file becomes also only 350kb on the printer with post script driver, and i can print without problems also.
my printer has 8 MB Ram and that should be enough for 3.5MB printer data.
But when i print the pdf with 1 side only, the printer created a side who is only filled with 50% of the text, then there comes out a second page with the message.....not enough memory in the printer.
i can not change the postscript driver to a pcl driver cause our ERP System can not handle printer with PCL drivers.
Can someone help me please.........are there settings in Reader X who can solve my problem ???
Thank you very much for help!

put ? after rwcgi60.exe

Is it somebody Except for me Who has problems With waching videos on ipad after the 5.0.1 update

Is it somebody Except for me Who has problems With waching videos on ipad after the 5.0.1 update

Hi,
yes I have big problems as soon as I open the video app i get a total black screen, even the upper bar with the time disappears. I already tried to:
1. closing the app and reopen it
2. restart the iPad
3. restore the iPad via iTunes
4. Begging the app to work again.

Wrt400n has problems with port forwarding

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for