WRT54G: User using the wireless network at the same time

I think about buying a WRT54G. But i didnt find any Inofmration, on how many users can connect via the wireles connection at the same time.
Thanks!!
Sincerely,
Ludwig Erl

As what I know,wrt54g routers can accomodate 253 client pcs whether wired or wireless computers....

Similar Messages

  • Can i use my mac mini for some users at the same time?

    can i use my mac mini for some users at the same time? i mean with their own screen, mouse, and keyboard

    If you're asking whether more than one user can use the computer at the same time with multiple displays, the answer is no. Other users can log in over a network with Screen Sharing, but each one will need his own computer (not necessarily a Mac.)

  • How to sync 2 different Mac users using the same Apple ID and with out mixing each other info?

    How to sync 2 different Mac users using the same Apple ID and with out mixing each other info?
    We are two people using three difrent Macs, 1 Iphone and 1 Ipad with separate USERS  on each Mac but sharing the same Apple ID: xxxxxx
    I set up the first user to iCloud and it was OK but when I set up the second user to use iCoud the first users's info gets mixed with the second user's info?
    Do we have to set up a diffrent Apple ID for each other?
    Sometime ago I added my friends E mail (yyyyy) to the main Apple ID (xxxx) as for using his E mail account (to separate our e mail accounts, and it's working ok) but now when I try to create a new apple ID whith the same friend's e mail (yyyyyy)  it says that his mail (yyyyy) is already an apple ID when the Apple ID is really my E mail (xxxxx)... any clue?
    Thanks

    I believe because you migrated from a Nokia to an iPhone you need to register the Bn phone number with your Apple ID so it can be used for iMessage. The Pn number seems to be the only one registered
    Go here > https://appleid.apple.com/cgi-bin/WebObjects/MyAppleId.woa/
    Manage your Apple ID and see if that does the trick
    Hope that helps

  • Hi everyone, to use the portal with many users using the same portal user?

    I have an another question is possible to use the portal with many users using the same portal user with diferent roles in the same time?
    thanks

    Hi Israel,
    It is possible to have same user logged in through differnt terminals or browser windows. However if there are say 10 roles assigned to that user, all 10 will be visible in all the windows. However you may open and work on different roles.. in the different windows.
    Note that the real time collaboration features shall not be available if the same user logs in multiple times.
    Hope this is useful.
    Regards,
    Anagha

  • 2 users at the same time ?

    Hi there, i photograph charity functions and do onsite printing, at the moment i use a MBA to preview the photo and then print. What i want to do is use one mac to preview the shot and another to edit and print. Is there a way to do this using Aperture ?
    Thanx in advance

    It is risky to put the Aperture library onto a network volume or to acces it by more than one user at the same time. Aperture is not made for Network access or concurrent access by more than one user. The simplest solution for your problem would be to move your Aperture library to a portable, external disk and plug this drive into the mac you are curently working with.
    The external drive needs to be formatted MacOS X Extended (Journaled) and the "Ignore ownership on this volume" needs to be set.
    The procedure is explained here for an iPhoto Library, but it would be exctly the same for an Aperture library: iPhoto: Sharing libraries among multiple users
    Regards
    Léonie

  • Can I use the same Time Capsule to backup two MacBook Pros?

    Basically, I want to know if I can backup my late 2009 MacBook Pro and my new one with retina display using the same time capsule? Maybe should I create different partitions on the time capsule?

    Yes, provided your backup drive is big enough. For a Time Machine backup your backup drive should be at least twice the capacity of the drive it backs up. In the case of two drives sum the capacities of the two drives. Be sure you backup drive is at least twice that capacity.
    You cannot partition a Time Capsule drive.

  • HT204380 Is there any way to "FaceTime " between 3 or 4 users at the same time?

    Is there any way to "FaceTime " between 3 or 4 users at the same time?

    No. FaceTime is one on one only.

  • HT3275 My Mac gave me a message saying that I had to create a new back up.I did this and I have lost a year's worth of back-ups.The crazy thing is that on my probook I still have them even though it is using the same time capsule.Any ideas if I can retrie

    On being prompted to create a new back-up on my Mac by Time Machine I lost a year's worth of back-ups.   The crazy thing is tht on my ProBook I still have them even though it uses the same Time Capsule, which to mind mind they are still there on the Time Capsule.   Has anybody else had this experience or has any suggestions how I can retrieve the info on my Mac?   Any help gratefully accepted!  Thanks

    cafranklyn wrote:
    On being prompted to create a new back-up on my Mac by Time Machine I lost a year's worth of back-ups.
    You might find useful advice on this Web page: Time Machine Troubleshooting, particularly item C13.
    The crazy thing is tht on my ProBook I still have them even though it uses the same Time Capsule, which to mind mind they are still there on the Time Capsule.
    Not necessarily.  Each Mac using a particular Time Capsule has its own set of backups that are independent of those of any other Mac.
    Has anybody else had this experience or has any suggestions how I can retrieve the info on my Mac?
    Why are those backups so important to you?  My advice is to move on and live without them.

  • How many wireless devices can WRT54G handle at the same time?

    In my house I have WRT54G router and WRE54G range expander that work great with 2 Compaq desktop PCs connected via wireless USB cards, one noname, wired, PC and an Acer laptop that uses both wired and wireless access (one or the other, I use laptop at home sometimes).
    The problem starts when I connect another laptop (Gateway). Immediately one or both of the wireless desktops is dropped and as long as the Gateway is connected, I can get the other two working by reseting the router and then only for a couple of minutes at the time.
    It looks like I can only use 2 wireless and two wired connections at the same time, which I think is odd.
    I've checked the router setup and tried experimenting with the allowed number of addresses that can be used, but that did not solve the problem.
    I've installed the latest software updates and that did not work either.
    I am using a secured access (WPA).
    What else can I try and what am I missing?
    Thanks!

    Thanks for a quick response!
    Under "Network adapters", here's what I found:
    - Broadcom 802.11g Network Adapter
    - 1394 Net Adapter
    - Marvell Yukon 88E8036 PCI-E Fast Ethernet Controler
    Two other wireless USB adapters are the same:
    - BLANC Mini Wireless USB adapter

  • Multiple users using the same templates?

    The place I work puts out a weekly TV show and we regularly use the same lower thirds for various titles that come up throughout the show. After opening them up in Motion 3 I saved the titles as templates, which is great because now I can do all the work in FCP rather than Motion.
    However, the templates are saved to my user on the local HD. We have multiple editors that work on multiple computers.
    Is there a way to make the templates available on all computers to all users?
    Any suggestions is appreciated.
    jesse.

    Too, here's one more roadblock to (hypothetically) consider.
    Even if what we've discussed happened to work, there would be one more issue: network bandwidth. When you add one of these "Master Templates" to a FCP timeline, then drag it to the browser, then right-click and select "Reveal in Finder", it points straight to the Templates folder that I alluded to earlier. Locally.
    So if this template lived in one central place then, potentially, all editors could be trying to access it, in real-time, remotely, simultaneously. I think this would wreak havoc quickly. Unless of course you're employing a SAN. Now we're talking about a whole new beast. (Unless you've got a SAN already. ;))
    Bottom line is you're going to distribute templates to all editors individually. Unless you're developing new templates all the time, then this shouldn't be too much of a chore. Just out of curiosity, how many editors will this be deployed to?

  • Multiple inputs from a user using the same variable !

    Hi Folks,
    I am trying out the following code block,which should ask the users to enter 3 different names using '&' operator & assign it to a variable v_ename every time the loop executes.
    declare
    type ename_table_type is table of
    emp.ename%type
    index by binary_integer
    ename_table ename_table_type
    begin
    for i in 1..3 loop
    ename_table( i ):= '&v_ename';
    dbms_output.put_line(ename_table(i));
    end loop;
    end
    The above code accepts a single input from the user & assigns the same input 3 times to "ename_table".thus the output shows the same name 3 times.
    Is it possible that we can have the user input 3 different names & then print them using the concept of Index by binary_integer ?
    Please help
    Thanks
    Om

    Server side PL/SQL is NOT designed for this kind of user interaction.
    the "&" character is intrepreted by the SQL*Plus application and before the PL/SQL block is submitted to the DB by the SQL*Plus application, it replaces each appearance of the &variable with the value entered. Once the block gets to the database, all it sees is a constant value - no more a variable name.
    &variable_name is a SQL*Plus application thing, not the database.
    Where will this type of logic will be eventually used? What client application will interact with the server side PL/SQL? You need to code this input logic in that client application.

  • Problem accessing hard drive for more than one user at the same time

    Hello all,
    I recently bought a 2nd generation AirPort Extreeme 802.11n to replace a cheapo wireless router. The main reason I wanted to get the AirPort was so I could attach a USB hard drive which holds iTunes music files Originaly I had a G4 MDD and this was a second internal hard drive. Since my wife and son also share my Mac, we stored the iTunes music folder there, so we could all access the files. That worked fine.
    Then I got a early 2009 iMac and gave my wife the G4. My son also has a G3 iBook, using the wireless internet conection. At first I had the drive in an external case attached via Firewire. Both my iMac and my wife's G4 are attached to the network using ethernet, not wireless. She was able to access the music files so long as my Mac was on, but the connection was flaky.
    So as mentioned, I picked up a used AirPort Extreme from OWC, mainly to attach the hard drive, since it's no longer in my Mac. It took some fiddling, and I was honestly surpsied that the APE was trickier to set up than expected, but now I have the external drive mounting, and we can all access the files from any of the Macs in the house. It works great except for one thing. If I'm logged into my iMac, and then another family member logs in on the same iMac, we don't all have access to the hard drive. It's still mounted, but the you have no permission to view the files on it.
    Then if I remount it, I can access the files, but now the other user can't.
    So in a nutshell, only one user can access the drive at the same time from the iMac, but we can all access it from different Macs.
    Anyone have an idea of why this is happening and how to remidy it?

    This is the boilerplate text often used in connection to saving to a network (please NOTE the part where it explains that normally, it does work, but that it is impossible to troubleshoot someone else's network remotely, and that's why it's not supported by Adobe):
    If you are opening files over a network or saving them to a network server, please cease and desist immediately in the event you are currently experiencing problems with one or more files. Working across a network is not supported.
    See: 
    http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/406/kb406793.html
      Copy the CLOSED file from your server to your local hard disk, work on it, save it again to your local hard disk, close it, and copy the closed file back to the server.
         Of course, the fact that Adobe does not support working across a network does not necessarily mean it won't work.   It should.
        Adobe's position is that there are too many variables in a network environment for them to guarantee that everything will work correctly in every network, especially given the fact that if something does not work properly, it's probably the network's fault, and Adobe has no way of troubleshooting your network.
      If you can't work locally, you are on your own, and if something happens, you're on your own. If you must work from a server, make sure your network administrator is a competent professional.
    When problems arise, a lot of valuable work can be lost.

  • Can a mac mini be set up to run two separate users at the same time?

    I work for a middle school and we need to purchase 20 computers that will just be used to run internet apps. Though we have all Macs, we don't have a big budget and for this one use only, we are condsidering purchasing inexpensive HP all-in-ones for about $450 each. However, I was wondering if a Mac Mini can be first set up with 2 partitions, install the OS on both partitions, then run two different users, with two separate monitors and keyboards, at the same time? This way, instead of purchasing 20 Windows computers, we could purchase 10 Mac Mini's (and displays) and save money, and still be supporting just one OS throughout the campus.

    If you setup a server, as in the Mac OS X Server Installation, pages 23ff show configurations, you can have multiple users, but they must all have computers.  Some installations can be done with dumb terminals but that is not what you seem to want.  Unix machines do have a multiple simultaneous user capability but you still have to have a computer for each user, again, not what you seem to want to do.  Right now there are two other users logged in on my Sun workstation on the desk behind me...they are logged in because I permit them to do so.
    And last night for an experiment I connected my iMac and MBP by ethernet wire, logged in on the iMac, then logged in on the MBP and from there on the iMac...but I set up the network to permit that and then disabled it again.  You can create security holes doing things like this.
    As dwb points out switching from Apple to PC equipment is a false economy that lures in administrators.  In our county school system we had a superintendent who hired a good friend...who had PC-industry ties.  Decided to remove all Apple equipment from the elementary schools and switch to PCs.  It wasn't long before they ended up going on a 4-year cycle of "refreshing" the equipment, i.e., completely replacing all hardware in every school on a four year cycle.  Since my wife was a Media Specialist, aka librarian, and responsible for technology in her school, every four years she had to develop a complete school map of where each teacher wanted the computers in their classrooms, complicated by where the technicians predetermined the locations of the network wire drops, of course.  then teachers get shuffled over the summer and all the plans are for naught.
    Anyway, there really isn't a solution to your problem except to buy a large number of computers and let each student use one and have them networked to a server, print server, printers, etc.  This is not inexpensive and cutting corners will only cause headaches for you.

  • Need help on making desktop application to web application having individual controls for users at the same time

    Hi,
    I have an desktop application and the following are the functionalities of the same.
    1. User inputs the data file with path (log file) to parse the required data.
    2. Once the user enters the path and starts the tool with start button, the tool parse the required data in terms of records and gives the records (creates output file containing all the useful records).
    3. Have popup window to display a group of data.
    4. Have popup to Plot graph. When a button is pressed in main GUI, the popup is opened giving scroll bar menus to choose the data for the graph. User after selecting the data (multiple Y axis) press another button to plot the graph. The input to this popup is the output file generated by this tool.
    5. The main GUI has buttons (play, step forward, step backward, reverse play, pause, stop, 1st record, last record - like tape recorder buttons) to play the records one by one.
    This application is used by many people and since its a desktop application (created in labview 2009), the user every time has to manually install the newer version.
    "So it is required to make the application into web based so that, the user can individually access the tool at the same time (different instances same as desktop app) and run their own data files from their system. The output files to be stored in the respective user's system."
    Can this be done using Web Publishing or Web Services present in LabView?
    I tried using Web Publishing but it gives control to only one user at a time and loading the files from the client path to run the tool is not possible.

    Simple. 
    If all you are worried about are updates, just put the EXE on a shared network drive and have your users launch it from there.

  • Outlook autocomplete cache stops working for multiple users at the same time

    Hi there
    Ever since we upgraded our Exchange 2010 to Exchange 2013 we have had problems with the autocomplete cache in Outlook 2010.
    We have 700 users and about once per week I get a call about the autocomplete cache. A few users are on cached mode, but most use online mode. The problem appears on both, but it can usually be corrected by /cleanautocompletecache.
    Granted, the autocomplete cache gets corrupted sometimes, but it seems to happen a lot for us. I have noticed that often more than one user experiences the problem at the same time, and, since the problem starting after upgrading Exchange, I suspect that
    the issue is with Exchange and not Outlook. Yesterday three users complained about the cache at the same time.
    I know how to get a broken cache going again - that is not the issue. The issue is keeping this from happening so often.
    Anyone out there able to help?
    Thanks!
    /Anders

    Hi ,
    Based on my knowledge , when you tried to send an email to a recipient in the same exchange organisation then the recipient address will be resolved in to legacy dn value and then that email will be delivered to destination mailbox by pointing towards to
    that legacy dn value.
    For the external recipients exchange user the smtp address to get it delivered.
    For your issue :
    Based upon the NDR message , we need to covert those values in to x500 format and add it to respective recipient mailbox as an x500 address.Then These erorrs will happen if the x500 value of the destination recipient is not available on it's maibox
    and that would be the cause of the NDR for most of the times.Some time as you said autocomplete cache would get corrupted on the client end but it is very rare.
    How to convert NDR to x500 address format :
    http://msexchangeguru.com/2012/03/15/x500/
    How to avoid getting such kind of NDR'S :
    https://www.simple-talk.com/sysadmin/exchange/exchange-e-mail-addresses-and-the-outlook-address-cache/
    In case if you don't want the users to use the autocomplete cache when composing the new emails :
    In group policy we can use the  office templates to disable the below mentioned option.
    1.use autocomplete to suggest the names ---> this option will comes under the advanced settings on the outlook client.
    In case if you don't want the users to use the autocomplete cache when composing the new emails as well as if you wanted to delete that autocomplete then you need to choose one more option along with the first one.
    1.Empty autocomplete cache.
    Please reply me if anyhitng is unclear.
    Thanks & Regards S.Nithyanandham

Maybe you are looking for