WRVS4400N Bandwidth Rate Control Issue

Dear All,
I just purchased a WRVS4400N VPN Security Router V2 and the main reason was for me to be able to segregate between VLANs and to be able to control bandwidth. Now I have tried everything possible to control Bandwidth using Rate Control. I have a 40Mbps downstream connection with a 16Mbps Upstream. I Have my servers connected to a VLAN 1 and my users Connected to VLAN 2. I tried limiting all the IP addresses from 192.168.2.50~200 to a max of 1000Kbps (1Mbps) Upstream on all Applications in order to leave the rest of the bandwidth for my servers...
I tried every thing but it wouldn't work..
I thought the problem was that the users are connected wirelessly, but even being connected directly to the ports doesn't work.
I tried with IPS on and off..
I disabled DHCP and gave the users static IPs..
A lot of other configurations also didn't work...
If there is something I need to know or if there is a special combination that needs to be set I would be really glad to hear anyone's opinion on this..
Thanks a lot in advance..

Can you post the log for the root bridge both with direct pc's attached and then showing when you connect them back to the switches?
Seth

Similar Messages

Issue with WRVS4400N v2 bandwith rate control (firmware 2.0.1.3)

I have an issue with the QOS setting / bandwith rate control.
I've tested it with a new factory config.
Setup : limit my IP (all ports) to max rate at 512 Kbit/sec (min rate to 1 Kbit/sec) in downstream and enable checked.
When I test my speed, there is no limit.
If it try the exact setup with a RVS4400 (without wireless) it works fine!!!
Does anyone have this issue or know how to solve it???
Thanks in advance
Al
Here is my setup... (and yes when I made sure I'm using 192.168.1.101 while doing the test...)

I have upgraded to the latest firmware V 2.0.2.1 with no difference.
The Rate control function is not working at all.
Cicso doesnt appear to want to fix it.

LRT214 - Bandwidth Management Rate Control Rule

I have an LRT214 that is configured with 3 VLANs. VLAN 1 just for management, VLAN 10 for internal devices, VLAN 20 for guest devices. Everytime i try to add Bandwidth Management Rate Control Rules for my VLAN 20 IP Range, the router stops responding within 10 seconds to 5 minutes. If I remove the rules, I am able to keep the network up for days. I have even had someone from Linksys Support remotely login to my computer then the router and remove my rules, then add them just like I had. It stayed up for about 3 minutes and then I lost network connections to all devices and couldnt even login to the router. Once I power cycle the router, i am able to get into the router long enough to remove the rules and then everything functions normally. Is anyone else having issues with Rate Control Rules or are there other steps that need to be done as well?
Just as an FYI, I do have an open case with Linksys but havent heard back from them since Wednesday the 21st. I have tried configuring another LRT214 and even a LRT224, the same issue happens when I add the rules on both of those as well.

QOS does a calculation based on the up\down Maximum bandwidths. Then applies that against the rules you set. It's critical that the values be accurate.
Rate control is like pie slices. Leave enough for the rest of the network.
Please remember to Kudo those that help you.
Linksys
Communities Technical Support

Service-Policy Or Bandwidth Rate Limit for IP

Hii Netpros,
Is this possible to configure the Service Policy(for Bandwidth) or Bandwidth Rate Limit for Single IP. For eg: If we want to configure the Service Policy(for Bandwidth) or Bandwidth Rate Limit of 2Mb for only IP " 10.10.10.3" on network i.e the Host or device which is configured with this IP can access upto 2Mb only.
Actual Network :-   We need this to configure this for wireless customers, Actually we have created one Vlan 2 (IP:- 10.10.10.1/29 @ our end router) , 10.10.10.2 on Basestation wiresss device (Vlan 2 allowed on this wireless device) and this wireless device is working as point to multipoint wireless. i.e 2 or more then 2 wireless customers or last mile will connect to this basestation wireless. Wireless customer-1 is 10.10.10.3 (2Mb bandwidth) and Wireless Customer-2 10.10.10.4 (512Kb).
Hence we require to limit the bandwidth for this 2 wireless customers having different bandwidth. how to acheive & control bandwidth @ our end router for them. please suggest.
Thanks

This topic is probably better suited in another Infrastructure forum, but I suppose it depends on which features are supported by your Cisco hardware and software. This doc discusses a variety of options:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2/qos/configuration/guide/qcfpolsh.html
For example, with the older CAR (committed access rate) approach:
interface FastEthernet5/0
     rate-limit input access-group 101 20000000 [normal burst size] [excess burst size] conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
     rate-limit input access-group 102 5120000 [normal burst size] [excess burst size] conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
access-list 101 permit ip 10.10.10.3 0.0.0.0
access-list 102 permit ip 10.10.10.4 0.0.0.0
You can observe CAR in action with "show interfaces fa5/0 rate-limit" for example.

5s Volume control issues

Anyone having volume control issues? My wife's 5s (less than a month old) is having issues with the up volume. If she mutes it using the down volume, it won't go back up. I can get it to work if I hold the volume a long time and it eventually comes back. Or last time i had to remove her case, hold the volume and release several times before it finally kicked in. Any thoughts or ideas? Thanks.

Hi,
Please test in other computer to see if the issue persists, it may be caused by the bad output channel.
But for better solution, I recommend you go to MSDN forum for further help.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-US/
Thanks for your understanding!
Regards,
Ada Liu
TechNet Community Support

Per user bandwidth rate limit.

How to configure per user bandwidth rate limit for wireless guest client, authentication server is ISE 1.2 & wireless controller is 5760.

The Cisco 5760 WLC supports better QoS than other c
ontrollers, allowing prioritization of mission-crit
ical
applications:
●
The Cisco 5760 WLC supports four wireless hardware
queues and priority-based queuing compared to
software-based queuing in existing controllers.
●
The Cisco 5760 WLC follows MQC based commands, allo
wing usage of exact commands for configuring
QoS on different types of network devices.
●
The Cisco 5760 WLC supports QoS policies to be appl
ied in a hierarchical fashion with more granularity
per SSID per radio, while on the current controller
s granularity is per WLAN.
●
The Cisco 5760 WLC supports approximate fair bandwi
dth to make sure of fairness at client, SSID, and
radio levels for Non-Real Time (NRT) traffic. There
fore, if one user consumes excessive bandwidth, we
can
limit the amount of bandwidth that user receives an
d thereby not deprive other users.

Legal control Issue - License cannot be used

Hi Team,
The sales order has Legal Control: Issue Error, due to this we are unable to deliver the goods. the below message found in the Log details:
Access object: License Master
Key (license nubmer): xxxxx
Validity period not long enough
Requested delivery date for item: 02/20/2012
End of validity period of license: 1231/2011
License cannot be used
we tried to extend the validity of license but it is not allowing. can anyone give some inputs on this error.
Thanks,
Rajam

Its a SAP GTS related error.
I hope you are aware of the License are created under Legal Control in GTS system.
If I'm not wrong, we can maintain License (GTS) by using TCode /SAPSLL/LCLIC01 and if the License is in active mode then can be modified by using TCode /SAPSLL/LCD_CHANGE
If my input didn't assist, then try to post your SAP GTS related query in SCN Forum following, for expertise help on SAP GTS.
- [Forum on *_SAP Global Trade Service_*|SAP Global Trade Services (GTS);
Regards
JP

Sample rate control not supported

Hi, I am trying to slow down the tempo of a Clip. I loaded the clip like this:
DataLine.Info info = new DataLine.Info(Clip.class, format);
try{
     clip = (Clip) AudioSystem.getLine(info);
     clip.open(mixedInputStream);
catch(Exception e){
        e.printStackTrace();
}When I try to obtain a sample rate control like this:
(FloatControl) clip.getControl(FloatControl.Type.SAMPLE_RATE);I get the message: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Unsupported control type: Sample Rate
Does this mean I can''t change the sample rate of my clip? Is there a way to fix this?
Thanks!

jamama wrote:
I get the message: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Unsupported control type: Sample Rate
Does this mean I can''t change the sample rate of my clip? Is there a way to fix this?I believe that the SampleRate control is only supported on data lines you're capturing from...to control the sample rate of the capture.

Bandwidth Rate Issue (Aironet 1310)

We have been experiencing major issues recently with the connectivity of 2 Aironet 1310 bridges that are about 300 yard apart. They have been up and operational for nearly a year and within the last week they cannot negotiate a stable rate (1-54Mb). We have opened up numerous TAC cases in which we have validated the optimal settings. The only thing we have been able to reproduce is when we have the bridges associated and just connected direcly to our pc's on each end we can associate at stable rate of 54Mb. As soon as we plug them into our LAN switches it tanks and will bounce from 6Mb to 1 Mb. We have checked the speed duplex settings on the bridges and switches and left them at auto. I don't understand why if the rate has already been negotiated and stable that it is affected as soon as you put any significant amount of traffic accross it. The only piece of info I have noticed is the throttle counter will increment on the dot1q radio int. I have found no good information on to what the throttle counter indicates and if this having an effect on the rate. Any ideas would be greatly appreciated. Orginally the bridges were on 12.3 code and having issues, we were told to upgrade to 12.4 with no change.

Can you post the log for the root bridge both with direct pc's attached and then showing when you connect them back to the switches?
Seth

Bandwidth Rate-Limit -w- WWR-Queue

How would one convert a layer-2 port's "switchport rate-limit" bandwidth statement, on a 6509 -w- WS-X6748-SFP ports, to a routed/layer-3 "wrr-queue" bandwidth statement policy? Basically trying to hard-core the port's speed to 20MB. Current/tested layer-2 port bandwidth setting:
rate-limit input 20000000 5000 5000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
rate-limit output 20000000 5000 5000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
Got lost in how to use/configure all WRR's four queues... just need to limit the port's bandwidth to 20MB. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Thanks, Kevin

1) Enabled QoS globally...
2960(config)#mls qos
2) Configure an ACL to define the matched traffic...
2960(config)#access-list 111 permit ip any any
3) Configure a class map for the matched traffic...
2960(config)#class-map traffic
2960(config-cmap)#match access 111
4) Configure a policy-map to define action...
2960(config)#policy-map Control
2960(config-pmap)#class traffic
2960(config-pmap-c)#police 10000000 8000 exceed-action drop
5) Attached the policy-map to the interface.
a) Example
-In this case, I'll attach the policy map to port_1....
2960(config)#int fa0/1
2960(config-if)#service-policy input Control
>>>>>> This will rate-limit traffic coming from the PC

24/7 Usage Control Issues

I recently setup usage controls on my daughter's phone (iPhone 4) and I'm having a few issues, but they don't seem to be something I can easily reproduce.
She gets calls from different numbers, adults even, that no one knows. I'm assuming that this is because her number was recycled. At any rate, I wanted to restrict her phone such that she can only talk/text with those on the trusted contacts list through usage controls.
I set up time restrictions (12:00am - 12:00am) to accomplish this, but I wasn't sure how their system would view this. I want it to block everything, 24/7, but I wasn't sure if this would be viewed. Would it be start time restriction and immediately stop it, or, start time restriction and stop at next 12:00am, then immediately start?
The reason I ask is because it seems to work, but then other times people on her trusted contacts list can't call or text her. Also, she got a text from someone not on her trusted contacts after I set it up, in the middle of the day (several days later). Just the one though.
Finally, I would like to know how the time restrictions work specifically. I can set these to maybe 12:00am to 11:59pm, there's a minute there unprotected, but I'm not sure if that will matter. If she receives texts while under a time restriction, are they refused or queued? In other words, if she received a bunch of texts through the day from numbers NOT on her trusted contacts list, at 11:59pm is she going to get a flood of texts?
Thank you all for reading, I would appreciate any advice!

Adding: the star for the radio works on both lock screen and control center but pause and next do not.

QoS bandwidth rate limit don't work

Hello
Buy a router RV120W, and one of the reasons is limit of bandwidth (QoS). I set up a profile of 1-256 kbps limit, and apply it to the only VLAN that is configured, but does not work and can navigate using the full bandwidth of the internet connection. My firmware version is 1.0.2.6
Screenshots attached
thanks
screenshots attached

Struggling with a similar issue:
the setup: internet adsl <--1mbs--> combined router/modem <--100mbs--> RV 120W
Internet speed is 1mbs. I want to priotize voip calls (via port) and deprioritize one machine (doing downloads). rest of the network should have something in between.
Firmware upgraded to 1.0.3.10
I created the profiles bindings, then in QoS settings, selected Priority, Wan total bandwidth 1mbs, and distributed my profiles onto low/med/high (10/31/61).
When what should be low is downloading, it gets the whole 1mbs and the other are dead slow.
Changed to rate limit, changed the parameters, etc... no more luck.
Can you please shed some light as how to configure this - in my case, the whole bw of wan is being used, and prioriization is not happening,
Rgds

Media Master Control Issues Unity 7.1

Hello Everyone,
I am having issues changing a system greeting with the media master control. I recorded the file directly into MMC, played the file to verify it, this all worked great. When I clicked save, the page reloads and says "Greeting Updated"... you would think all is well, but it just reverts back to the standard system greeting every single time.
Unity 7.1
Background on what I have tried:
IE 8-11
Firefox 25
Java 6-30, 7-11, 7-40, 7-45
This also does the same thing when I click open file and upload a .wav file. The file plays fine, but will not save.
I'm sure there is something simple I am missing... new to voice so thank you in advance!

What happens if you uninstall the Java 7 JREs? I have experienced strange behavior and errors similar to this. Rolling back to Java 6 cleared things up.
Please remember to rate helpful responses and identify helpful or correct answers.

Jabber for Windows 9.2 deskphone control issue

Hi experts,
I'm having a problem with the newly installed Jabber for Windows 9.2.0. When I click on the bottom right "control phone" and select my Cisco 7941 it fails. I tried restarting the Cisco CTIManager service with no luck.
Deployment:
IM&Presence: cloud (Webex service)
CUCM version: 8.6(2a)
LDAP integration: full (with authentication)
Deskphone control was working prior the upgrade of Jabber for Windows. Everything else remained the same version.
Using Jabber softphone as a client still works fine.
CUCM ENd User is correctly configured.
Wireshark trace of my Jabber for Windows 9.2 client communicating with CUCM when attempting to control my deskphone shows the following:
Username: filippo.zangheri
Password: checked three times (it is correct because Jabber softphone works fine).
Any hint?
Thanks.
Filippo

Davide,
I know i am kind of late to the party on this one but i have fixed my issue and wanted to give you the information to see if this will work for you. If this is even still an issue?
I too had the same issue and just like you i confirmed everything was correct however I discovered something when I was looking into my End User profile on the CUCM. I had originally swapped my 7971 phone with a new 8945 phone and I had both phones associated with my line for a while before I removed the old 7971.
My End User profile still had both phones associated with my number even though the 7971 phone had been removed from my line. This was not allowing the CTI to connect to my 8945 phone or allow my jabber client to "Control Phone" properly because it couldn't figure out which phone to control. I went into the CUCM and physically deleted the 7971 phone from the system which released the associated phone in my End User profile. Once I did that, I "Control Phone" in my Jabber client and voila it worked like a charm!
To make sure I didn't have any Jabber client issues after doing this i signed out of my Jabber client and deleted the local system profile for the Jabber client and then signed back into Jabber and let it recreate the profile. Once that was done i have not had any issues with my Jabber client controlling my phone and all functions work perfectly.
Hope this helps...

[Solved] Screen brightness control issue

I just purchased a Lenovo T410s. I have set it up to only use Nvidia and only give visibility to the Nvidia GPU. The problem I have is once X starts I can no longer change the screen brightness with the function keys. I'm using KDE and it registers that I'm trying to change the brightness but the screen never changes. If switch to run level 3 I can use the function keys to change the brightness without an issue. I'm confused at what is causing the issue. I'm not sure what information you need to help me, but I will give you what you need if you tell me.
EDIT: I discovered on the Nvidia forums that the backlight function was disabled in the drivers for this model. Apparently when in use it causes squealing sounds.
Last edited by migizi (2010-12-09 13:15:40)

I did some more testing and here is what I found out. I switched my laptop to use integrated GPU only, so that means Arch sees my GPU as the Intel HD. Now I can boot X and control my brightness with the functions keys. Has anyone else run into the problem with Nvidia drivers and the Quatro NVS 3100m GPU?

WRVS4400N Bandwidth Rate Control Issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for