WS-X6704-10GE Problem
I have a Catalyst 6509 with supervisor 720-3B and IOS 12.2(17d)SXB10. I have installed a X6704 4 port 10Gb card in slot 1 and powered up the system. The X6704 is recognised but is powered off with a message stating that it is not supported. Using show module the online daig status is unknown and the detals for the card are as follows:
HW FW Sw Status
1.5 12.2(14r)S5 12.2(17d)SXB Other
I have tried using alternate IOS levels such as 12.2(18)SXD4 but get the following error messages:
%PM_SCP-SP-1-LCP_FW_ERR: System resetting module 1 to recover from error: Linecard received system exception
%OIR-SP-3-PWRCYCLE: Card in module 1, is being power-cycled Off (Module Reset due to exception or user request)
Can someone please tell me what is wrong and if its the IOS I'm using what level I need to support the card.
Thanks
Hi Paresh,
I don't think I have any of those cards. Using show module I have the following:
Mod Ports Card Type Model Serial No.
1 16 SFM-capable 16 port 1000mb GBIC WS-X6516A-GBIC SAL0715BHAR
2 4 CEF720 4 port 10-Gigabit Ethernet WS-X6704-10GE SAL08280B14
3 48 48 port 10/100/1000mb EtherModule WS-X6148-GE-TX SAL09465FNV
4 6 Firewall Module WS-SVC-FWM-1 SAD071903HF
5 2 Supervisor Engine 720 (Active) WS-SUP720-3B SAL09358QGZ
6 48 48 port 10/100/1000mb EtherModule WS-X6148-GE-TX SAL09475WKY
9 48 48 port 10/100/1000mb EtherModule WS-X6148-GE-TX SAL094448HW
Mod MAC addresses Hw Fw Sw Status
1 0009.11f7.ff90 to 0009.11f7.ff9f 1.0 7.2(1) 8.3(0.156)RO Ok
2 0011.5ccf.08b0 to 0011.5ccf.08b3 1.5 12.2(14r)S5 12.2(18)SXD7 PwrDown
3 0015.f998.2e38 to 0015.f998.2e67 1.1 7.2(1) 8.3(0.156)RO Ok
4 0003.feab.7538 to 0003.feab.753f 2.0 7.2(1) 2.3(3)2 Ok
5 0013.7f0a.e194 to 0013.7f0a.e197 4.4 8.1(3) 12.2(18)SXD7 Ok
6 0015.f943.e990 to 0015.f943.e9bf 1.1 7.2(1) 8.3(0.156)RO Ok
9 0015.c6c9.32a4 to 0015.c6c9.32d3 1.1 7.2(1) 8.3(0.156)RO Ok
Mod Sub-Module Model Serial Hw Status
5 Policy Feature Card 3 WS-F6K-PFC3B SAL09358QTN 2.1 Ok
5 MSFC3 Daughterboard WS-SUP720 SAL09358N63 2.3 Ok
Mod Online Diag Status
1 Pass
2 Unknown
3 Pass
4 Pass
5 Pass
6 Pass
9 Pass
does this mean I need some extra kit to use the x6704 ?
Thanks,
Paul
Similar Messages
-
Hi..
Any idea if the 4 port 10GE card WS-X6704-10GE runs at line rate for each port ? Can we get approx 40Gbps throughput out of this card ?
Eng WeeHi Eng wee,
The 4 port 10 Gigabit Ethernet interface module is CEF720 based and communicate using 40-Gbps connections to the integrated 720-Gbps switch fabric of the Supervisor Engine 720.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_data_sheet09186a00801dce34.html
HTH,
-amit singh -
Difference between WS-X6704-10GE or VS-S720-10G-3C 10G port
Hi All,
We have a presales case, where the partner is asking the difference between VS-S720-10G-3C and the WS-X6704-10GE linecard . He is asking from the perspective of the performance and features comparison.
I would appreciate any information that anyone would be able to provide. Thanks for the help in advance.
Awaiting your reply,
Regards
Sinu AliasThe following paper outlines deployment scenarios for the two cards if using them for Virtual Switch Links.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps9336/prod_white_paper0900aecd806ee2ed_ps2797_Products_White_Paper.html
Brief excerpt:
âVSL-capable interfaces are required to create a VSL port channel. The current modules that support the formation of a VSL port channel are the 10 Gigabit Ethernet uplink ports on the Supervisor Engine 720-10G VSS (VS-S720-10G-3C/XL) and the Cisco 8-Port 10 Gigabit Ethernet Switching Module (WS-X6708-10G-3C/XL). (Refer to Figure 5.)
Figure 5. VSL-capable Modules
These interfaces contain new port ASICs that allow the VSH to be encapsulated on each frame forwarded out of the port and also support the ability to de-encapsulate VSH-tagged frames.â
It is a start... -
Catalyst 4507 Sup V-10GE problem
Hello,
We have two Catalyst 4507 connected to two sites at the same city throught a black fiber. We use the Gigabit Ethernet ports on the Sup V-10GE to connect the fiber via Cisco CWDM.
It is the second time that the superviser enginge V-10GE is frozen; L1 and L2 are correct on the switch, the link is well connected. but the switch does not response to IP requests like ping and ssh (L3 does not work). We should reboot the switch to resolve the problem.
Why did it happen? Is it a bug of the Sup V-10GE?
Thank you.
Jessie DongWhen the problem is present do you have console connection? how is the proc cpu? Have you check the STP when the issue is there? Is chaging the uplink port to antoher port regain connectivity to the switch? Wihtout much more info, there no way to tell whether you are running into a bug or not.
-
Modules supported on WS-X6704-10GE line card for WS-C6509-E
We are planning to expand the local network and looking to add 10G line cards on our WS-6509-E. The confusion is over the types of optic modules that these cards support.
Can anyone advice if these line cards support all these three - namely XENPAK, X2 & SFP Plus?
ThanksWhat is the difference between these supervisor (VS-S720-10G-3C or VS-S720-10G-3CXL)
See the "XL" at the end of the part number? If you get the regular (no "XL"), you'll only get 256k IPv4 routes. The "XL" will allow you up to 1 million IPv4 routes.
Is these modules will work with c6509E and these supervisor (VS-S720-10G-3C or VS-S720-10G-3CXL)
Yes and no. Yes, these supervisor cards will work on the current chassis you've got. But if you plan to use VSS, then your 6704 line card is incompatible with VSS.
Another thing, don't waste your money. Firstly, the price of the Sup720 is exactly the same as the price of the newer (and more powerful) Sup2T supervisor card.
And lastly, rumours has it that the 6500 chassis is in it's "last gasp". Personally, I'm waiting for Cisco to announce the EoS/EoL.
If you want to future-proof your investment, the potential replacement of the venerable 6500E is the 6880-X/6807-X. -
Unusually low Rx power values ? WS-X6704-10GE (10Gbase-SR)
Referencing...http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/modules/ps2797/ps5138/product_data_sheet09186a008007cd00_ps5455_Products_Data_Sheet.html
The Optical Transmit and Receive Specifications for this transceiver (XENPAK-10GB-SR) indicate :
Tx Power (dBm) : Max -1.2, Min -7.3
Rx Power (dBm) : Max -1.0, Min -9.9
We are seeing readings on one of these modules that are clearly well outside these ranges.
Tx Power (dBm) : -18.6
Rx Power (dBm) : -40.0
No interface errors or anomolous behaviour of any kind is indicated on this interface at this time.
My question.
Without getting into the detail of what could be the potential cause of this particlar interface showing these readings (as all of the other interfaces are reading within the specified range), could I get an opinion as to what impacts, if any, we can expect to see on this interface as a result of these observed values ?
Thank you for your inputs./* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}
Tx power is measured from this XENPAK and must be inside the specified range. -18dBm is around 32 times less than expected. I would consider this XENPAK as broken and replace it as such strong power difference can cause errors on a receive side.
Rx power range is what is expected from the remote end. Measuring Rx power makes sense when there is something transmitting light to us and we want to confirm an incoming power does not exceed our Rx power range.
/A -
7600 1 Gig to 10Gig routing performance problems
I have a 7606 with a sup720 and msfc3
with WS-X6148-GE-TX and WS-X6704-10GE
I am trying to send ~1.2 Gbps of traffic from the 6148 to the 6704.
I have a packet generator connected to 10 of the 1G ports each sending ~120Mbps 512byte packets. The first 3 (1/30-1/32)ports don't drop any packets but the next 7 ports (1/33-1/39) drop ~2.25% each.
I checked "show int summary" and it is reporting that packets are being dropped on the input queues.
The config is pretty much default.
I just don't understand why so much packet loss at such a low rate.
I know the 6148 is just a wiring closet blade but it's supposed to have 32Gbps bandwidth to the backplane.
Is there something I need to tune?Hi,
There are currently no 10/100/1000 that are 100% non-blocking (running all ports at 1000 and line rate).
AS for the 6704, it's not quite 100% non-blocking.
"Fully nonblocking when using only two ports (2 and 4, 1 and 3, 1 and 4, or 2 and 3)
Up to 98 percent nonblocking with all four ports active when using dCEF"
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/modules/ps4835/products_data_sheet09186a00801dce34.html
The module's forwarding ASIC (there are two onboard) maxes out at about 26mpps, which equates to roughly 17Gb at 64 bytes. You get better throughput at larger packet sizes, but never quite 100%.
HTH,
Bobby
*Please rate helpful posts. -
I'm about to do a data center migration and I'm replacing all of my core switching. My plan is two 6509's in the core and 4948-10GE's at the access layer to provide 10gig back to the core. I'm a little confused on the fiber connectors available on the 6500 modules. Are the 4948-10GE's able to connect to the 6500's using the WS-X6704-10GE module?
Thanks for the help.
DennisHi Dennis,
The Cisco 4948-10GE is shipping out with X2-10GB-LR which is 10 Km on SMF, the WS-X6704-10GE is shippped out with XenPAK 10 GE Module. You can establish the optical connectivity between the 10GE-X2 and the XenPAK Module.
You can also refer to the attached ZIP File that contains a PDF on Cisco Catalyst 4900 Series Switch.
Thanks and Regards
Sriharshaa Prabhakar
Technical Specialist - Networking & Security
Enterprise Services
Wipro Infotech
Mission Road
Bangalore
Email:[email protected] -
VSS on 6800 using mix 10GE modules
Hello,
We are about to set up two Cisco 6800 running VSS across them.
I have read and I quote ¨ VSLs can be configured with up to eight links between the two switches across any combination of line cards or supervisor ports to provide a high level of redundancy.¨
Each switch come with a VS-S2T-10G(2 x 10GbE) supervisor and a WS-X6704-10GE module card.
My questions is: Can I use one port from the each supervisor and one port from each module card to create the VSLs with no issue? Please see the attached image as reference.
Thanks!!!Hi,
6704 module can't be configured as part of a VSL link. There is 6708 and 6716 that support VSL.
VSL Hardware Requirements
The VSL EtherChannel supports only 10-Gigabit Ethernet ports. The 10-Gigabit Ethernet port can be located on the supervisor engine module or on one of the following switching modules:
•WS-X6708-10G-3C or WS-X6708-10G-3CXL
•WS-X6716-10G-3C or WS-X6716-10G-3CXL
•WS-X6716-10T-3C or WS-X6716-10T-3CXL
Link:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/12-2SX/configuration/guide/book/vss.html#wp1053988
HTH -
Video streaming - is Qos the answer?
We're having problem with a video stream we are distrubuting to a few users. Lately we got a lot of complaits regarding glitches/freezing in the video.
Hardware in 7600's: WS-X6704-10GE
Topology:
Incomming stream<<--port channel 2G Fiber-->>7600(SUP720)<<--10G fiber-->>7600(RSP720 SVI for video)<<--10G fiber-->> Switch<<-1G RJ45->>PC
- I've checked the interfaces on the 7600's but cant see any errors on the interfaces or output drops on the interfaces(no congestion?)
- We're seeing TX drops from the edge switch to the pc's. Investegating the cause with vendor. But my guess can be buffer problem going from 10G to 1G?
- We have not implemented any Qos on the 7600's however we have enabled qos to prioritize the video vlan on the edge switch.
- Peak traffic between 7600 and edge switch is about 1G(5min average)
- Would enabling QoS on the 7600 and do End to End Qos solve the problem? As far I understand qos will only help if the interface is congested which isn't the case here?
- What would be the best strategy for video streaming? Would the solution be to use the CBWFQ + LLQ for this kind of traffic or would LLQ starve the rest of the queue's?
Best RegardsDisclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
"We're seeing TX drops from the edge switch to the pc's. Investegating the cause with vendor. But my guess can be buffer problem going from 10G to 1G?"
Probably, and those drops could be the cause of your "...glitches/freezing in the video."
So, what you might want to first address is using QoS on egress edge ports to insure video traffic isn't dropped.
"...we have enabled qos to prioritize the video vlan on the edge switch."
Prioritized in what sense? Dequeuing priority often makes little difference for typical buffers depths at gig or better bandwidths. Priority avoiding drops, though, might be worthwhile. -
Wism Module Controller 2 not detect IP Address
Hi, im badrul..i got one problem regarding the wism module controller. as we know in wism module have 2 controller, controller 1 and controller 2. i try to configure that wism module. but only controller 1 can used. for controller 2, it not detect the IP address that assign by DHCP. i try direct console on console port 2 on wism module, but it not detect console also. so i need help from who expert on this matter to soft my problem.
Thanks Justin on your respond
here the commands :
sh module
Mod Ports Card Type Model Serial No.
1 24 CEF720 24 port 1000mb SFP WS-X6724-SFP SAL1329U59V
3 6 Firewall Module WS-SVC-FWM-1 SAD1311014S
4 8 Intrusion Detection System WS-SVC-IDSM-2 SAD124101TB
7 2 Supervisor Engine 720 (Active) WS-SUP720-3B SAL1326T4VZ
9 10 WiSM WLAN Service Module WS-SVC-WISM-1-K9 SAD132500BX
10 8 CEF720 8 port 10GE with DFC WS-X6708-10GE SAL15108PHU
11 4 CEF720 4 port 10-Gigabit Ethernet WS-X6704-10GE SAL1329U9DC
12 4 CEF720 4 port 10-Gigabit Ethernet WS-X6704-10GE SAL1416FNEH
13 8 CEF720 8 port 10GE with DFC WS-X6708-10GE SAL1517CGRF
Mod MAC addresses Hw Fw Sw Status
1 0026.0b5b.46b4 to 0026.0b5b.46cb 4.1 12.2(18r)S1 12.2(33)SXH5 Ok
3 0021.a082.b420 to 0021.a082.b427 4.5 7.2(1) 4.0(4) Ok
4 0021.d869.d4e0 to 0021.d869.d4e7 6.4 7.2(1) 5.0(2) Ok
7 0024.1499.51d8 to 0024.1499.51db 5.9 8.5(3) 12.2(33)SXH5 Ok
9 0024.9774.2344 to 0024.9774.2353 2.3 12.2(14r)S5 12.2(33)SXH5 Ok
10 c89c.1d2f.5a78 to c89c.1d2f.5a7f 2.3 12.2(18r)S1 12.2(33)SXH5 Ok
11 0026.0b5b.4694 to 0026.0b5b.4697 2.9 12.2(14r)S5 12.2(33)SXH5 Ok
12 8843.e11b.4eb0 to 8843.e11b.4eb3 3.1 12.2(14r)S5 12.2(33)SXH5 Ok
13 e05f.b974.e7d0 to e05f.b974.e7d7 2.3 12.2(18r)S1 12.2(33)SXH5 Ok
Mod Sub-Module Model Serial Hw Status
1 Centralized Forwarding Card WS-F6700-CFC SAL1329U27Q 4.1 Ok
4 IDS 2 accelerator board WS-SVC-IDSUPG CFBG8260009 2.5 Ok
7 Policy Feature Card 3 WS-F6K-PFC3B SAL1326SS36 2.5 Ok
7 MSFC3 Daughterboard WS-SUP720 SAL1326T1EZ 4.0 Ok
9 Centralized Forwarding Card WS-SVC-WISM-1-K9-D SAD1324048G 2.1 Ok
10 Distributed Forwarding Card WS-F6700-DFC3C SAL1516C139 1.4 Ok
11 Centralized Forwarding Card WS-F6700-CFC SAL1327TF1L 4.1 Ok
12 Centralized Forwarding Card WS-F6700-CFC SAL1414EZAX 4.1 Ok
13 Distributed Forwarding Card WS-F6700-DFC3C SAL1517CHK1 1.4 Ok
Mod Online Diag Status
1 Pass
3 Pass
4 Pass
7 Pass
9 Pass
10 Pass
11 Pass
12 Pass
13 Pass
show wism status
Service Vlan : 900, Service IP Subnet : 20.20.10.254/255.255.255.0
WLAN
Slot Controller Service IP Management IP SW Version Status
----+-----------+----------------+----------------+-----------+---------------
9 1 20.20.10.1 172.28.40.11 5.2.178.0 Oper-Up
9 2 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Service Port Up
show wism module 9 controller 1 status
WiSM Controller 1 in Slot 9 configured with auto-lag
Operational Status of the Controller : Oper-Up
Service VLAN : 900
Service Port : 9
Service Port Mac Address : 0025.84a9.a062
Service IP Address : 20.20.10.1
Management IP Address : 172.28.40.11
Software Version : 5.2.178.0
Port Channel Number : 417
Allowed-vlan list : 8,15,19,31,40-41,44,50-51,200,208,212,800,900
Native VLAN ID : 900
WCP Keep Alive Missed : 0
show wism module 9 controller 2 status
WiSM Controller 2 in Slot 9 configured with auto-lag
Operational Status of the Controller : Service Port Up
Service VLAN : 900
Service Port : 10
Service Port Mac Address : 0025.84ba.08a2
Service IP Address : 0.0.0.0
Management IP Address : 0.0.0.0
Software Version :
Port Channel Number : 418
Allowed-vlan list : 8,15,19,31,40-41,50-51,200,208,212,800,900
Native VLAN ID : 900
WCP Keep Alive Missed : 0
TQ again Justin... -
XENPAK-10G-LR does not switch off the laser
Hi.
We have a problem with the XENPAK-10G-LR that doesn't switch off the lasser in shutdown state, installed in 6509 with WS-X6704-10GE. The other side of the connection doesn't detects the shut.
I have checked that the X2-10G-LR disables the light, then the other side see the interface as down/down.
What is the cause?
Any method for disable the laser?
Regards.
JoseHi.
We have had the same problem in 7600 (12.2SR) and 6500 (12.2SX).
I checked the realase notes and field notices, without results.
As a workaround, you can activate 'ethernet oam' to check that link is really up (if the other box supports it).
Regards.
Jose -
Hi.
We use a monitoring software to draw graphics from our Cisco 7609 router.
Graphs from physical interfaces are ok, but those from the SVI (vlans) are very "spiky".
#show mod
Mod Ports Card Type Model Serial No.
1 24 CEF720 24 port 1000mb SFP WS-X6724-SFP
5 2 Supervisor Engine 720 (Cold) WS-SUP720-3BXL
6 2 Supervisor Engine 720 (Active) WS-SUP720-BASE
7 4 CEF720 4 port 10-Gigabit Ethernet WS-X6704-10GE
Is there a way to get SVI graphs look good ?
Thank you.Problem solved
The hexto bin converter i was using (vb.net) was not converting correctly, solved by manually do the conversion
Thanks to all of you that looked into it
Regards
Alexander EId -
Help with IPSEC? Can you apply crypto map to SVI?
Hi All,
Got a problem with a site-to-site IPSEC vpn implementation where one end is using SVI (eg: interface vlan 10).
Does any body know if a crypto map can be applied to a SVI to bring up the IPSEC tunnel? It accepts the command but I can't pass any traffic to/from it.
interface vlan 10
crypto map MY-MAP
Or do you need to apply the crypto map to a physical interface?
I've gotten it working on a sub-interface (eg: interface GigabitEthernet0/0.11) but can't find any documentation that talks about applying it to a SVI and whether this will work. Anybody tried it using SVI's before?
This is to be done on a Cisco 7606 (sup720).
Thanks.
AndyHi Jerry,
I'm not that cluey with all the hardware on the box itself, but here's what we have on the box.
core1#sh ver
Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
IOS (tm) s72033_rp Software (s72033_rp-IPSERVICESK9_WAN-M), Version 12.2(18)SXF16, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
cisco CISCO7606 (R7000) processor (revision 1.0) with 983008K/65536K bytes of memory.
Processor board ID FOX092502NB
SR71000 CPU at 600Mhz, Implementation 0x504, Rev 1.2, 512KB L2 Cache
Last reset from power-on
SuperLAT software (copyright 1990 by Meridian Technology Corp).
X.25 software, Version 3.0.0.
Bridging software.
TN3270 Emulation software.
228 Virtual Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interfaces
124 Gigabit Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interfaces
4 Ten Gigabit Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interfaces
1917K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
8192K bytes of packet buffer memory.
65536K bytes of Flash internal SIMM (Sector size 512K).
Configuration register is 0x2102
core1#sh mod
Mod Ports Card Type Model
1 48 CEF720 48 port 10/100/1000mb Ethernet WS-X6748-GE-TX
2 48 CEF720 48 port 10/100/1000mb Ethernet WS-X6748-GE-TX
3 24 CEF720 24 port 1000mb SFP WS-X6724-SFP
4 4 CEF720 4 port 10-Gigabit Ethernet WS-X6704-10GE
5 2 Supervisor Engine 720 (Active) WS-SUP720-3B
6 2 Supervisor Engine 720 (Hot) WS-SUP720-3B
Mod Sub-Module Model Hw Status
1 Centralized Forwarding Card WS-F6700-CFC 4.0 Ok
2 Centralized Forwarding Card WS-F6700-CFC 2.1 Ok
3 Centralized Forwarding Card WS-F6700-CFC 4.0 Ok
4 Centralized Forwarding Card WS-F6700-CFC 4.1 Ok
5 Policy Feature Card 3 WS-F6K-PFC3B 2.1 Ok
5 MSFC3 Daughterboard WS-SUP720 2.3 Ok
6 Policy Feature Card 3 WS-F6K-PFC3B 2.3 Ok
6 MSFC3 Daughterboard WS-SUP720 3.0 Ok
Based on the specs above, is this box capable of establishing a IPSEC tunnel by applying the crypto map to the SVI???
Thanks.
Andy -
ADM(Anomaly Dectector Module) PowerDown Failure in upgrade process.
hellow, everyone.
i'm yunchouljung in korea
i have a question about ADM module power down issue.
i had upgraded AGM Module successfully in version 6.1.2 to 6.1.6
but failed ADM Module upgrade in version 6.1.2 to 6.1.6
i uploaded a AP images in MP status and enterd "hw-module module 12 reset cf:4" command.
(i waited a message "you can now reset the module....")
after a reset process, ADM module disabled by SCP dnld Failure.
so, i enabled a power on ADM Module but result is same.
my upgrade process is below.
1. hw-module module 12 reset cf:1
2. copy ftp://[email protected]/c6svc-adm1G-k9.6-1-6.bin pclc#12-fs:
3. hw-module module 12 reset cf:4
anybody help me?
thanks in advance.
p.s : i have already tested other ios version and ap/mp images.
================================================================
the module version and log is below.
Router_OUT#sh module
Mod Ports Card Type Model Serial No.
2 3 Anomaly Guard Module WS-SVC-AGM-1-K9
3 16 16 port 1000mb GBIC ethernet WS-X6416-GBIC
5 48 SFM-capable 48 port 10/100/1000mb RJ45 WS-X6548-GE-TX
7 2 Supervisor Engine 720 (Active) WS-SUP720-3B
9 4 CEF720 4 port 10-Gigabit Ethernet WS-X6704-10GE
10 8 Network Analysis Module WS-SVC-NAM-2
12 3 Anomaly Detector Module WS-SVC-ADM-1-K9
Mod MAC addresses Hw Fw Sw Status
2 0017.e067.ec6c to 0017.e067.ec73 2.0 7.2(1) 6.1(6) Ok
3 000e.d73c.3d40 to 000e.d73c.3d4f 2.5 5.4(2) 8.5(0.46)RFW Ok
5 0015.2bfe.c130 to 0015.2bfe.c15f 10.1 7.2(1) 8.5(0.46)RFW Ok
7 0016.c85e.3aa0 to 0016.c85e.3aa3 5.2 8.4(2) 12.2(18)SXF1 Ok
9 001b.d45d.f890 to 001b.d45d.f893 2.6 12.2(14r)S5 12.2(18)SXF1 Ok
10 0003.fead.7592 to 0003.fead.7599 2.0 7.2(1) 4.0(1) Ok
12 0012.80f1.1ae8 to 0012.80f1.1aef 1.0 7.2(1) 8.5(0.46)RFW PwrDown
Mod Sub-Module Model Serial Hw Status
7 Policy Feature Card 3 WS-F6K-PFC3B SAL10478K1R 2.3 Ok
7 MSFC3 Daughterboard WS-SUP720 SAL104892TJ 2.5 Ok
9 Centralized Forwarding Card WS-F6700-CFC SAL1124QX44 3.1 Ok
Mod Online Diag Status
2 Pass
3 Pass
5 Pass
7 Pass
9 Pass
10 Pass
12 Not Applicable
Router_OUT#
47w1d: SP: The PC in slot 2 is shutting down. Please wait ...
47w1d: SP: shutdown_pc_process:No response from module 2
Jul 13 16:54:49: %C6KPWR-SP-4-DISABLED: power to module in slot 2 set off (Reset)
47w1d: SP: OS_BOOT_STATUS(2) MP OS Boot Status: finished booting
Jul 13 16:56:50: %DIAG-SP-6-RUN_MINIMUM: Module 2: Running Minimal Diagnostics...
Jul 13 16:56:57: %MLS_RATE-4-DISABLING: The Layer2 Rate Limiters have been disabled.
Jul 13 16:56:57: %DIAG-SP-6-DIAG_OK: Module 2: Passed Online Diagnostics
Jul 13 16:56:57: %OIR-SP-6-INSCARD: Card inserted in slot 2, interfaces are now online
Jul 13 16:56:58: %SVCLC-5-FWTRUNK: Firewalled VLANs configured on trunks
Jul 13 17:32:23: %SVCLC-SP-5-STRRECVD: mod 2: <Application upgrade has started>
Jul 13 17:32:23: %SVCLC-SP-5-STRRECVD: mod 2: <Do not reset the module till upgrade completes!!>
Jul 13 17:42:11: %SVCLC-SP-5-STRRECVD: mod 2: <Application upgrade has succeeded>
Jul 13 17:42:11: %SVCLC-SP-5-STRRECVD: mod 2: <You can now reset the module>
47w1d: SP: The PC in slot 2 is shutting down. Please wait ...
47w1d: SP: PC shutdown completed for module 2
Jul 13 17:42:57: %C6KPWR-SP-4-DISABLED: power to module in slot 2 set off (Reset)
47w1d: SP: OS_BOOT_STATUS(2) Anomaly Guard OS Boot Status: finished booting
Jul 13 17:45:03: %DIAG-SP-6-RUN_MINIMUM: Module 2: Running Minimal Diagnostics...
Jul 13 17:45:06: %MLS_RATE-4-DISABLING: The Layer2 Rate Limiters have been disabled.
Jul 13 17:45:06: %DIAG-SP-6-DIAG_OK: Module 2: Passed Online Diagnostics
Jul 13 17:45:06: %OIR-SP-6-INSCARD: Card inserted in slot 2, interfaces are now online
Jul 13 17:45:07: %SVCLC-5-FWTRUNK: Firewalled VLANs configured on trunks
47w1d: SP: The PC in slot 12 is shutting down. Please wait ...
47w1d: SP: shutdown_pc_process:No response from module 12
Jul 13 17:53:29: %C6KPWR-SP-4-DISABLED: power to module in slot 12 set off (Reset)
47w1d: SP: OS_BOOT_STATUS(12) MP OS Boot Status: finished booting
Jul 13 17:55:30: %DIAG-SP-6-RUN_MINIMUM: Module 12: Running Minimal Diagnostics...
Jul 13 17:55:37: %MLS_RATE-4-DISABLING: The Layer2 Rate Limiters have been disabled.
Jul 13 17:55:36: %DIAG-SP-6-DIAG_OK: Module 12: Passed Online Diagnostics
Jul 13 17:55:37: %OIR-SP-6-INSCARD: Card inserted in slot 12, interfaces are now online
Jul 13 18:26:27: %SVCLC-SP-5-STRRECVD: mod 12: <Application upgrade has started>
Jul 13 18:26:27: %SVCLC-SP-5-STRRECVD: mod 12: <Do not reset the module till upgrade completes!!>
Jul 13 18:37:05: %SVCLC-SP-5-STRRECVD: mod 12: <Application upgrade has succeeded>
Jul 13 18:37:05: %SVCLC-SP-5-STRRECVD: mod 12: <You can now reset the module>
47w1d: SP: The PC in slot 12 is shutting down. Please wait ...
47w1d: SP: PC shutdown completed for module 12
Jul 13 18:38:35: %C6KPWR-SP-4-DISABLED: power to module in slot 12 set off (Reset)
Jul 13 18:46:04: %C6KPWR-SP-4-DISABLED: power to module in slot 12 set off (Module Failed SCP dnld)
Jul 13 18:53:54: %OIR-SP-6-REMCARD: Card removed from slot 12, interfaces disabled
Jul 13 19:01:28: %C6KPWR-SP-4-DISABLED: power to module in slot 12 set off (Module Failed SCP dnld)> *** ERROR => ThInit: db_connect (step 1, th_errno
> 13, action 3, level 1) [thxxhead.c 10156]
Is your database running (mounted and open)?
Markus
Maybe you are looking for
-
I turned off my phone and when I turned it back on, all my apps were deleted. I tried to reinstall my apps, but it wouldn't let me. My storage still remained the same even though, all my apps were deleted. How can I get my apps back?
-
Upgrade to KT6V-LSR gone wrong, system freezes and BSOD's
Hi guys! I just recently bought a KT6V-LSR to replace and Asrock K7S41GX motherboard. After putting all together (specs on signature) installed windows from scratch in a new partition on the master drive. Installed VIA 4 in 1, DirectX 9.0c, Catalyst
-
Baselin date as a recent GR posting date
My Requirement is to modify baseline date in MIRO to Recent GR posting date for which i have implemented BADI 'MRM_PAYMENT_TERMS and its functioning properly in MIRO . after doing the payment and generating the invoice document number for same what
-
Is there a way to delete attachments without S_OC_ROLE, ADMINISTRATOR value
Hello, Our PM analyst has reported a need for PM Users to be able to manage attachments for several areas. Specifically, they are not able to delete outdated attachments or attachments done by former employees or those who have been transferred. Wh
-
How do I delete any trace of my mobile me galleries from my iphoto application? I have signed out of MM, but the online albums still appear in the side bar. I do not host any photos from this computer. Thanks