WSA Multiple Interface Question

Due to the fact that the ASA has a limitation with WCCP (http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa80/configuration/guide/dhcp.html#wp1094628) of having the client and WCCP proxy on the same interface not allowing WCCP redirect pass through. I was curious if anyone has deployed a WSA in a dual homed infrastructure to support the multiple interfaces and pass through limitations? Would love to have p1 assigned the inside proxy and p2 assigned for the dmz proxy. I have not tested this yet but will be tomorrow, figured I would post tonight to solicit feedback.
Cisco ASA 5550 - 8.0.4(32)
outside - x.x.x.x
dmz - 10.255.0.100 /24
inside - 10.0.0.100 /24
WSA P1 - 10.0.0.200 - currently supports inside -> outside proxy
WSA P2 - 10.255.0.200 ????? to support the dmz -> outside proxy???

The WSA does not support pass through / inline mode.

Similar Messages

Best app to import and study multiple choice questions.

Hi,
I'm searching for an app to help study for an exam.
Part of the studying strategy is to study by the previous exams questions. I have those (a lot of them) in text format.
The app would need to have:
- Support for multiple-choice questions;
- Easy, fast and automated way of importing the questions;
Would be nice to have:
- Ability to include a rich-text comment along with the right/wrong answer;
- Support for tagging each questions.
I've used the search function and found this:http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1041085 but it's been a while since then.
thanks in advance

Hi Konrad;
What approach would you recommend to import and export EBS data? Open Interfaces, PL/SQL, web services or anything else?For your question please check below notes:
Export/import process for R12 using 11gR1 [ID 741818.1]
Export/Import Process for Oracle E-Business Suite Release 12 using 10gR2 [ID 454616.1]
General Notes For E-Business Suite Release 12 [ID 986673.1]
Please also check below thread:
how to export data from ebs
how to export data from ebs??
Also check below search which could help you about your issue:
http://forums.oracle.com/forums/search.jspa?threadID=&q=import+export+&objID=c3&dateRange=all&userID=&numResults=15
http://forums.oracle.com/forums/search.jspa?threadID=&q=export+data&objID=f475&dateRange=all&userID=&numResults=15&rankBy=10001
Hope it helps
Regard
Helios

Single IDOC to Multiple Interface Mapping

We have a requirement in our project where one masterdata IDOC will be sent from a SAP MDM box and will be transformed to a target IDOC and be sent to an SAP SNC box. However, the scenario is that depending on the contents of the IDOC, there can be multiple IDOCs that need to be created. For example, the single MDM IDOC has V1, V2 and V3 values then the IDOCS that should be sent to the SAP SNC box should be three.
The IT head of the customer decided against using Enhanced Interface Determination (since the problem can be easily solved using a 1:n mapping) due to the complexity especially when the solution is rolled out to other regions as each region has it's own logic (currently, the other implementation has only 1:1 mapping so there is no problem). I had developed a 1:n mapping but the resulting map is too big and very complex.
What I tried to do is to create separate mappings for each scenario that an IDOC needs to be generated out of the values from the received IDOC in XI and then define rules in the Interface Determination. Problem is that XI throws an error stating that multiple interfaces are found. So I cannot use Interface Determination to trigger creation of multiple IDOCS of the same type with different values from a single IDOC sent by the same SAP box.
Question is, is there any way to solve this requirement without using Enhanced Receiver Determination. I was thinking of BPM but not really sure how to do it.
Thanks in advance!
Best Regards,
Rommel Mendoza
Hewlett Packard Asia-Pacific, Ltd.

Thanks a lot for that.
For example, We have this input Message:
<ZMATMA>
<IDOC>
 <E1MARAM>
 <E1MARMM>
 <MEINH>IT</MEINH>
 </E1MARMM>
 <E1MARMM>
 <MEINH>CS</MEINH>
 </E1MARMM>
 <E1MARMM>
 <MEINH>SW</MEINH>
 </E1MARMM>
 </E1MARAM>
</IDOC>
</ZMATMA>
then there should be an output of:
<SAVEMULTIPLE204>
<IDOC>
 <BUOM>IT</BUOM>
</IDOC>
</SAVEMULTIPLE204>
<SAVEMULTIPLE204>
<IDOC>
 <BUOM>CS</BUOM>
</IDOC>
</SAVEMULTIPLE204>
<SAVEMULTIPLE204>
<IDOC>
 <BUOM>SW</BUOM>
</IDOC>
</SAVEMULTIPLE204>
The logic is when the MEINH field of the ZMATMA02 IDOC has the values: IT, CS and SW, create one IDOC for each.
Thanks in advance!
Edited by: Rommel Mendoza on Nov 6, 2008 7:30 PM

Delete a column froma table that is used in multiple interfaces

Is there a way to delete a column from a table where the table is being used in an interface ? The only way I could find so far was to delete the interface, delete the column then recreate the interface.
Otherwise deleting warns that the object is referred to by another object and lists the interfaces.
unfortunately the table in question is being referred to in multiple interfaces, so I'd prefer not to have to recreate all of them.
Many thanks

You can delete all the mappings (source an target) which refer to this column and then physically delete the column.
It's long but maybe better than dropping the whole interfaces using this column.
Regards and Merry Christmas
Brice

DHCP and multiple interfaces

Is it better to list each machine and interface as a separate entry in 10.5.7 DHCP or make a single entry with multiple interfaces?
I am looking at grouping my Wireless AP, instead of having to list each one separately.
For example:
MAIN-MDF00-01
XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX 10.0.2.1
Or
MDF-AP
XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX 10.0.2.1
XX:XX:XX:YY:YY:YY 10.0.2.2

Joe,
Currently you cannot base the anchoring on the AP group. It is only based on the SSID.
Now, do you really need to split up the guest into different subnets? Or are you concerned about the AP groups?
If you truly need to break up the guest to different subnets, then you would need to create different SSID on the internal and anchor controller. Then on the anchor, link to the appropriate interface.
If you are concerned about the AP group, don't be. Just because you are using the AP group, doesn't meant that all the guest ssid can't link to the same interface, they can. You can even create a dummy interface on the internal WLC, so that if the anchoring doesn't work, they do not get an address.
Cheers,
Steve
If this helps you and/or answers your question please mark the question as "answered" and/or rate it, so other users can easily find it.

How to use multiple Interfaces for the same BS?

Hi @ ,
Is it possible to have a scenarion where i am using multiple interfaces in the same BS based upon some conditional field in the message.
I amnot able to get the solution I know with condition editor I can have multiple receivers but in my scenarion based upon message fiels i have to decide which BAPI to be used and wht mapping and then post it to the same System
Any help will be highly rewarded
Regards

Hi-
Yes it is possible you can use multimapping for mapping the interfaces.
To know more about multimapping see
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/21/6faf35c2d74295a3cb97f6f3ccf43c/content.htm
Some more helpful links
/people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible

Multiple Interfaces on a single web service URL

we have a scenario where we have a multiple interfaces that are related to SD that needs to be exposed to another system. When we generate the WSDL from XI - it seems we can do only for one interface at a time.
Is there a way - where in we can expose a single URL and treat these interfaces as web methods on that single URL? (similar to .Net or Java)
If yes - how do we do that?
Thanks.

That will not be possible. Instead you have to expose only one interface which takes generic data as input. In the mapping, depending on dat, you should map them to various other interfaces which would definetly make your scenario complex..
In XI each outbound interface is a separate web service (method).
VJ

Multiple Choice Question Issues

I am embedding a quiz within my presentation with individual
question slides interspersed throughout the presentation. These
questions are pulled from a couple of different question pools. I
want to use a multiple choice question that branches to different
parts of the presentation depending on the correct or incorrect
answer. If the user answers the question incorrectly, I send them
to the next slide which has two click boxes. On this slide, they
can either click one box to move back in the presentation and
review the material or click another box to move them forward to
another multiple choice question. If they go back and review the
information, they would eventually return to the same multiple
choice question to try it again. (This is the desired navigation,
anyway.)
What actually happens is that when the user goes back to
review the information and then finally returns to the question,
the question has not been reset and still shows the incorrect
answer marked with no way to clear it.
I have used this same navigation on a drag-and-drop type
question and it works fine. All the settings for the
multiple-choice questions are set the same as in the drag-and-drop
question.
Any help in making this work correctly would be greatly
appreciated.

I can't see where that error might arise except possibly for a case where an AS2 radio is used since it appears they don't have a group property, but an AS3 radio button does. Check to be sure that your Flash Publish Settings are set to use AS3. AS3 errors normally have error numbers which also makes the error you quoted ring of an AS2 scenario.
Here's a link to the file I made based on your code that works fine and doesn't display the errors you mention. It is a CS3 file.
http://www.nedwebs.com/Flash/AS3_Radios.fla

Multiple choice question in intractive pdf?

Hi,
I have a question about Multiple option question. How to create Multiple option single answer question with explanation popup in interactive PDF. Please guide me.
Regards
Anil

Yes, this worked fine.
I just had to place the animal to the left of the table and just reduce it slightly in size. It worked fine.
Thanks!

Single SOAP receiver adapter for multiple interfaces

Hi,
I have to send multiple interfaces like Vendor, Customer, Material to one receiver.
I want to configure only one communication channel (receiver SOAP adapter) to send all these interfaces. Is this possible?
Currently I am provided with different URLs from the receiver system as below.
http://host:port/Services/Vendor.wsdl
http://host:port/Services/customer.wsdl
http://host:port/ServicesMaterial.wsdl
I will be having 3 Sender agreement, 3 receiver determination, 3 interface determination and 3 Receiver agreement.
I want only one SOAP reciever adapter which goes inside all the above 3 Receiver agreement.
So When I give the target url as http://host:port/Services, the messages fail.
But When I specify the full targert url in the adapter as http://host:port/Services/Vendor.wsdl then it works.
Which means I would have to create as many communication channel as interfaces.
Is there a work around for this?

hi kantheri,
For this, we have to fill the TargetURL and the SOAPAction in Receiver Communication channel dynamically.
So, we need to write UDF in Message Mappings using DynamicConfiguration to fill the TargetURL and the SOAPAction Dynamically.
DynamicConfigurationKey keyURL = DynamicConfigurationKey.create("http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/SOAP","THeaderSOAPACTION");
DynamicConfigurationKey targetURL=DynamicConfigurationKey.create("http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/SOAP","TServerLocation");
// access dynamic configuration
DynamicConfiguration conf = (DynamicConfiguration) container
.getTransformationParameters()
.get(StreamTransformationConstants.DYNAMIC_CONFIGURATION);
conf.put(keyURL,"Soap action");
conf.put(targetURL,"target url");
return "";
In this UDF, we are filling the TargetURL in u201CTServerLocationu201D message attribute and SOAPAction in u201CTHeaderSOAPActionu201D message attribute.
So, whenever we execute this corresponding operation these values will be filled in receiver communication channel at runtime.
TargetURL- Give some dummy URL or http://
SOAPAction - *
regards,
ganesh.

BPM using multiple interface

Hi All,
i have a sceanrio where i have one sender idoc and multiple(5) soap receivers.so i have five interface that have same sender idoc and different soap receiver.Soap is syncronous and sending us the response of that message.
So we have to create a scenario as IDOCSoapRequestSoapResponse---File for each interface
I know it requires BPM to fullfill the condition of multiple interface.Please suggest the BPM design to achive the scenario.
Regards
Laxmi Bhushan

hi Laxmi Bhushan Jha ,
IDOCSoapRequestSoapResponse---File for each interface
As per my knowledge that is poosiable and simple with SOAP Lookup in ESR Mapping
for Soap Lookup:
Webservice Calls From a User Defined Function.
and coming to id:
in receiver determination , we need to define multiple recievers
in interface determiination, we define multiple operation mappings.
thanks,

Select more than one answer on a multiple choice question

How do you select more than one answer on a multiple choice question on an employment application on the internet?

marmaldonado,
Is this a PDF form? Or a web form?
Clinton

Idoc to multiple interfaces in XI

Hi,
how can we handle same Idoc ( MATMAS.MATMAS03) sending to multiple interfaces in XI otherthan using multi mapping?
If we develop one scenario now and in future if you want to send same idoc to different systems, do we have to change the existing interface?. Alternatively is it possible to add another interface?. Please clarify.

ok, as it's case 1, I think it's easier.
You have two ways:
1. Inside ID, use your previous Scenario:
=> after that, you will have 1 scenario...
1.1 Create a new Business Process (BPM_2)
1.2 Inside your existing Receiver Determination, add your new BPM_2 as a receiver (use righ-click + "insert above").
1.3 with your triplet "Sender_name + Sender_interface + BPM_2", create your Interface Determination
1.4 As receiver is a BPM, Receiver Agreement is not needed.
Then, you need to configure the step "BPM_2 -> Receiver_2"
1.5 Create a Receiver Determination between your BPM_2 (sender) and your receiver_2.
1.6 create your Interface Determination
1.7 create your Receiver Agreement (receiver adapter)
2. Inside ID, use a new Scenario:
=> after that, you will have 2 scenarios which use the SAME Receiver Determination "Matmas -> Receiver_1 + BPM_2"
2.1 create a new Scenario
2.2 ADD to this scenario your existing Receiver Determination ("Matmas -> Receiver_1").
2.2 do the same steps than "1.1 -> 1.7"
At the end, you will have:
Matmas --> | Receiver_1 => File_1 with single Idoc
 | BPM_2
 BPM_2 --> Receiver_2 => File_2 with collected IDocs
Mickael
Message was edited by: Mickael Huchet

SWIG - C++/Java and multiple interface inheritance - SWIG typemaps

In C++ I have the following. Can someone explain how to use SWIG typemaps to accomplish multiple interface inheritance in Java? I understand there is a javainterfaces typemap built into SWIG however I am such a newb with SWIG I really don't know where to start.
class IRemoteSyncIO
public:
virtual ~IRemoteSyncIO () {}
protected:
IRemoteSyncIO () {}
private:
IRemoteSyncIO (const IRemoteSyncIO&);
IRemoteSyncIO& operator= (const IRemoteSyncIO&);
class IRemoteAsyncIO
public:
virtual ~IRemoteAsyncIO () {}
protected:
IRemoteAsyncIO () {}
private:
IRemoteAsyncIO (const IRemoteAsyncIO&);
IRemoteAsyncIO& operator= (const IRemoteAsyncIO&);
class RemoteMpe : public IRemoteSyncIO, public IRemoteAsyncIO
}Thanks!

Actually now I understand what you mean.... Ok, now I am going to modify the problem slightly and add Interface2 into the picture. The new code is:
interface Interface1<SelfType extends Interface1<SelfType>>
interface Interface2
class Superclass implements Interface1<Superclass>
class Dependant<Type extends Interface1<Type>>
 public static <Type extends Interface1<Type> & Interface2> Dependant<Type> getInstance(Class<Type> c)
 return new Dependant<Type>();
class Subclass extends Superclass implements Interface2
public Subclass()
 Dependant<Subclass> dependant = Dependant.getInstance(Subclass.class);
}Now, previously I could replace:
Dependant<Subclass> dependant = Dependant.getInstance(Subclass.class);
with
Dependant<Superclass> dependant = Dependant.getInstance(Superclass.class);
and it solved the problem, but now that Type must implement Interface2 I cannot.
The reason I added this requirement is that this is actually what is going on in my applicationI had made mistakely omited this detail from the original use-case.
Can you think up of a possible solution to this new use-case?
Thanks,
Gili

Assigning multiple interfaces for Oracle API Gateway (OAG)

We are deploying Oracle API Gateway to throttle our incoming API requests. We would like to keep the incoming external API requests separate from the internal configuration management so that they go through different interfaces when accessing the OAG server. This is mainly for security reasons so that the external people won’t have access to the interface used by internal operations team to manage OAG. Based on your experience, is there any standard best practice to accomplish this? We were thinking to perhaps use two of the server’s network interfaces with different IPs, one for the incoming API requests and the other for the internal admin management of OAG. But not sure if this is the best way to do what we need. We are aware of OAG's capability to support two separate ports to handle this situation, but would like a more secure set-up that could completely eliminate external access to the OAG management done by the IT team.
Would appreciate any thoughts on best practices used regarding multiple interfaces for OAG set-up. Thank you. Oracle Marketing Cloud.

You are on the right track.
Here is how you can achieve this:
You can use multiple network interfaces on the UNIX machine and setup networking/routing in such a way that all external traffic comes on on one card and is routed internally via a different card.
Segregate difference types of services (i.e to be used by external clients vs internal apps) into difference different "Service Groups". Have each of these service groups listen on different port + NIC card (under Listeners, you can define a port to list to list on a specific network address and port instead of *).
Setup additional protection for services that will be accessed by external clients. Use "Threatening Content " filter to protect your services.
Setup 2 way SSL for the interface that will be called by external clients. Setup a DN based authorization check if you want to have both authentication and authorization.
Hope this helps.
-Thanks,
Ankit Kumar

WSA Multiple Interface Question

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for