X-Fi Fatal1ty Front Mic (2) and

All,
I have installed my X-Fi Fatalty with no issues except for this little software glitch. I am trying to use the front panel Mic2/Input2 and Headphones jacks on the front audio panel with my headphone/microphone headset. The headphones work great but when I ever try to use the microphone BF2 does not recognize the headset unless I drop into the Soundblaster console and select the Mic2 as the input which works but the BF2 VOIP Setup seems to change the setting back to the Microphone setting once the changes are saved it changes the input back to microphone (). Is there anyway to make this change stick?
Audi'ver

hi ya same problem for me also when using front panel.everytime i join a game it changes it back to microphone then i have go to to desktop and change it back to min in 2 in my mixer. which is very annoying.considering we have payed a lot of money for this souncard we shouldnt be having this issue i have resulted in using the back connections now cause the mic at the back is default microphone.and so is battlefield i guess thats why it keeps changing the configuration.when i was using the front panel i had to disable voip in bf? to stop it from changing back i mainly use ts but even if you want a quick work with a squad? member who aint on ts you cant.this problem cleary needs to be sorted. i like to use the front panel cause you have the volume for mic and headphones.so using back panel you have to alt tab out to adjust your mic.so it clearly isnt compatible with bf at all .

Similar Messages

Why does the black iPhone 5 not have a front mic?

I noticed that the white iPhone 5 has a front mic while the black does not. How come?

What you're NOT seeing on the black model is the proximity sensor which is to the left of the earpiece/speaker if the phone is viewed from the front. This is visible on the white model but not the black model.
The mic is apparently contained within the earpiece/speaker hole. See the following .pdf file (you need Acrobat Reader installed to view) and zoom in to the front view.
http://goo.gl/gJ1q3

[SOLVED] No mic capture and weird flash after disabling midi daemon

Hello everyone, I'll jump to the topic:
This morning I installed timidity and the freepats soundfont for timidity. I enabled the timidity.service, listened to some midis and then realized that I didn't have sound playback for everything except the midis.
Having done what I wanted with timidity, I disabled the timidity daemon and rebooted, hoping that the audio playback would work as prior to enabling the said daemon. Playback did work indeed afterwards, but a whole new lot of relevant {?} problems emerged:
The microphone now doesn't work and, goodness me, youtube videos starting from 360p quality, they automatically escalate second by second to reach 1080p
I've tried purging {pacman -Rns} and reinstalling alsa-utils but the problems persist. I will continue tinkering with alsa's config, as capture has in many cases been tricky {I noticed the microphone doesn't work when I connected to a teamspeak channel, if that's of any use}. I post so early mainly due to the youtube problem, for which an online solution is nowhere to be found, possibly because of the multitude of youtube-related problems. I understand this might not be enough info, but I have no idea what else could be useful to you.
Edit: youtube videos don't have sound for the little that the videos play before switching to a higher resolution. Also, after reaching 1080p, the video stops and the usual error message of youtube appears. So, I suppose that this behavior is because flash can't find the playback device.
Last edited by wigo (2013-06-24 12:45:44)

So, since the rest of the problems were solved with another reinstall of alsamixer as mentioned above, it was easy at this point to track the source of the mic problem. After digging at the mic recording page of alsa: http://alsa.opensrc.org/Record_from_mic I found a clue about having to select the microphone device by pressing the spacebar (rear mic or front mic). It were that easy, and I would have figured it out, if I knew that I had to select one of the two mic devices. So, by switching to front mic, everything is now working. I just don't get why a midi daemon had to cause all this... anyways, thanks for your time reading this.

Audigy 2 problems with mic headset and Teamsp

What settings and what are they under do I have to change to make Teamspeak work properly with my Logitech Precision PC Gaming Headset and City of Heroes? Everyone wants me to leave Teamspeak because when I go into the channel it creates this massi've noise. Or, when I played with settings to try to fix it they can barely hear me. Everyone was trying to help me with my settings but we were getting no where. I have a Soundblaster Audigy 2 and the latest drivers and programs from SB installed. What needs to be muted, not muted, what needs to selected for mic settings and not. PLEASE HELP! :-)
Terry

I have a Dell XPS Gen 2. I was using the mic/headphone jacks in the front of the computer. When I switched the mic/headphone to the back of the computer in the soundcard, everyone heard me fine. Go into both your Creative Labs Surround Mixer control panel and make sure you have your mic selected on Record to Mic. I have the following muted in there with the X: Midi Synth, CD Audio, CD-Digitial, and ALSO Microphone. Keep Line-In and Wave umuted. In your XP Sound control panel, the same thing. Also go into advanced Mic settings there and make sure the DB boost is checked. In TS under Settings/Options/Sound Devices I have it set to Wave and then both SB Audigy is selected for input/output. Settings/Options/Sound Input/Output Settings I have Push To Talk selected. I'm sure now that I have it working I can play with it some more to get Voice Activation tweaked to work well, but I'm happy that they can hear me without a giant helicopter sound coming through anymore. :-) Let em know how it goes.
Terry

I can record voice memos fine using the built-in iPhone 4 mic. And my Bluetooth headset (Jawbone Era) works fine when I leave messages on voice mail systems etc. when calling on the iPhone 4. However, I cannot record voice memos with my Bluetooth mic.

I can record voice memos fine using the built-in iPhone 4 mic. And my Bluetooth headset (Jawbone Era) works fine when I leave messages on voice mail systems etc. when calling on the iPhone 4, so it appears my headset mic is fine. I can also use voice activated dialing, although it fails miserably interpreting numbers. However, I cannot record voice memos with my Bluetooth mic. I just get barely audible static. Any suggestions? Thanks.

Hello, did you ever get an answer to your question? I just picked up a Jawbone Era and using on an iPhone 4s running 5.0.1. Seems to work fine on regular calls, but not on the built in Voice memos application. It worked fine on my older Jawbone Icon, but haven't tested on the 4s or iOS 5.
Thanks!

Last night, I saw my iPhone on the table in front of me and twice it made phone calls on its own. I just watched it make the outgoing call as it sat in front of me. Should I think that it has a virus? What should I do about it?

Last night, I saw my iPhone on the table in front of me and twice it made phone calls on its own. I just watched it make the outgoing call as it sat in front of me. Should I think that it has a virus? What should I do about it?
Also, it's been a little quirky lately: slow to respond to key pad touching and making it impossible to delete Apps?
Should I try wiping it and restoring it to factory settings?
Thank you.
Ben

It isn't a virus.
I would try the Restore from backup first and if that does not help try a Restore as a new iPhone.

My music has a ! in front of it and says it cant find it how do i get it back its on about 50 songs tried downloads not there

My music has a ! in front has ! in front of it and says it can't find it how do i get it back already look in my downloads its about 50 songs.

"Where do I find my hundreds of dollars of downloads I have done since 2005?"
They will only be where you put them If you are doing the very basics, then they will be on your computer and they will be in your backup copy of your computer.
The itunes store is not global at all, never has been. You cannot redownload your content from another country. You can only use the countrys itunes store for the country that you are physically located.

After downloading itunes on my new computer all of my songs have an exclamation point in front of them and it says the song could not be used because the original file could not be found. How do I fix this?

After downloading itunes on my new computer all of my songs have an exclamation point in front of them and it says the song could not be used because the orginal file could not be found. How do I fix this?

Hey waltee911,
It sounds like you're seeing something similar to this picture:
If that's the case, the following article has troubleshooting steps to solve the issue:
iTunes: Finding lost media and downloads
http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1408
Welcome to Apple Support Communities!
Sincerely,
Delgadoh

When I drag a picture into my imovie it creates a thumbnail but when it plays over it, it shows the picture in front of it and not the picture...and when I go to crop adjustments it shows a black screen. How do I fix this?

when I drag a picture into my imovie it creates a thumbnail but when it plays over it, it shows the picture in front of it and not the picture...and when I go to crop adjustments it shows a black screen. How do I fix this?

I had a similar problem, and i found that the photo was of very low resoluton. As a test I resized the image to a lrager resolution using photoshop CS4 and re saved it as JPG. I imported the new saved image and it seem to have fixed the problem.

There is a tiny gap all around the side of my ipod between front aluminium panel and stainless back. Is it normal?

I just bought an Ipod classic and noticed that there is a tiny gap all around the side of ipod between front aluminium panel and stainless back.
Is it normal?
I am just concerned because when I was given the box at the Futureshop, the box had a big dent on the side.
(as if the box was dropped from 2-3 feet high atleast)
I was wondering the dent would've done something to make that gap on my ipod.
I am thinking to return it if it is defective
Any advice?
Thank you

Return it, there should be no gap, for creeepy crawlies to go in and make nest and poop on your iPod circuit.

Musings: MVC Front Controller/Command and Controller Strategy

Hi,
I am currently taking my first shot at implementing the Front Controller pattern, the Command and Controller Strategy flavor, in Java. When applying the pattern, my chosen point of focus is achieving as much isolation as possible of Client-specific implementation details from the rest of the framework (Web-based framework Clients, Swing-based framework Clients, queueing-based framework Clients, etc.) However, I am running into a lot of (apparent?) inconsistencies when it comes to CCS discussions "out there", so I have a feeling that perhaps I have misunderstood the Front Controller/Command and Controller Strategy pattern. Maybe the MVC gurus out there would have some thoughts on the matter.
My issues:
1.) Some CCS discussions seem to assign View presentation (sometimes called "dispatch", or "rendering", or "forwarding"?) to an ApplicationController. It seems puzzling to me, since only a concrete FrontController should include any knowledge of a concrete View structure. Shouldn't only a FrontController perform a logical-to-physical resource mapping, thus encapsulating knowledge whether a particular View is a separate, stand-alone Web page or a compound, argument-driven Swing object, and how to "present it" (by either redirecting to a Web page, or bringing a particular Swing object into the foreground)?
2.) Some CCS discussions seem to introduce Client-specific implementation details at the ApplicationController level, for example "HTTP requests" or "HTTP responses". It seems puzzling to me, since I feel that every part of the framework, except for a concrete FrontController, should be completely independent of the nature of a Client making a request. Instead, I created a generic Request object w/arguments and have a concrete FrontController translate any client-specific details into such a generic Request, before delegating to an ApplicationController.
3.) In the light of the (2.) above, I am not sure what constitutes a "response" from an ApplicationController back to a FrontController. It seems to me that the only universal "response" is a LogicalViewEnumeration: what View to present once a command has been completed, in many cases a "don't care", or a "show the requestor", or a "show a home page" (not every request has to result in changing a View). Well, perhaps a LogicalViewEnumeration as well as possible View arguments (?).
4.) In the light of the (3.) above, I suspect that any failures in Request delegation, or Command execution, should be perhaps propagated back to a FrontController by exceptions only, since, say, a WebFrontController might want to show a click-through error page, when a SwingFrontController might prefer to show an error dialog box, a LogicalErrorViewEnumeration might not make sense at all in the context of a particular Client, for example a queueing Client.
5.) In the light of the (4.) above, there is the question of an appropriate Request interface (into an ApplicationController), an appropriate Response interface (back into a FrontController), as well as an appropriate ViewArguments interface (into a FrontController and later into a View). The problem with generic Requests is that they can be created with nonsensical argument combinations, so shouldn't Requests be abstract and force proper arguments in concrete subclasses, through explicit constructors (in a sense, degenerate Commands)? The problem with Responses and ViewArguments is that... well, I have not found any formal discussion anywhere as to what those should look like. In most samples I have encountered, Responses include Client-specific implementation details, as mentioned in (2.), above.
6.) Some CCS discussions seem to introduce a Flow Manager at the ApplicationController level. It seems puzzling to me, since the whole point of the Command and Controller Strategy flavor seems to be centralization of business logic execution within self-contained Command objects. Shouldn't Requests get associated with Handlers (objects capable of actually carrying out Requests) and transformed into Commands inside an ApplicationController, thus Commands themselves return appropriate LogicalViewEnumeration back to an ApplicationController, back to a FrontController? Let's consider a ShowMyShippingAddress request coming into the framework: unless such a Request is eventually treated as a Command returning a particular LogicalViewEnumeration, it is suddenly a Flow Manager "acting" as a business logic driver. I guess the question here is: except for a few special cases handled by a particular ApplicationController (authentication, error conditions, default behavior, etc.), should flow management be considered stand-alone, or always delegated to Commands?
7.) Some CCS discussions seem to include an extra Request argument that specifies an ApplicationController to use (Request.Action="create", Request.Controller="account", Request.Username="me-me-me"), instead of using a Router inside of a FrontController to resolve to a particular ApplicationController through a generic action (Request.Action="createAccount", Request.Username="me-me-me"). I am not sure about the reason for such a design decision: why should a Client or a FrontController be allowed to concern itself with an implementation-level structure of the framework? Wouldn't any framework state -dependent ApplicationController resolution issues be best handled inside a Router, used by a FrontController to resolve [obtain] an appropriate ApplicationController, thus preventing Clients from ever forcing the framework into a possibly inconsistent behavior?
Any comments appreciated...
Thanks,
Gary

gniemcew wrote:
1.) Some CCS discussions seem to assign View presentation (sometimes called "dispatch", or "rendering", or "forwarding"?) to an ApplicationController. It seems puzzling to me, since only a concrete FrontController should include any knowledge of a concrete View structure. Shouldn't only a FrontController perform a logical-to-physical resource mapping, thus encapsulating knowledge whether a particular View is a separate, stand-alone Web page or a compound, argument-driven Swing object, and how to "present it" (by either redirecting to a Web page, or bringing a particular Swing object into the foreground)?It is hard to tell without reading the actual discussion, but my guess is that the posters were either conflating or being loose with the distinction between a FrontController and an ApplicationController. The former is (normally) intimately tied to the actual view being used (HTTP, Swing, etc.) whereas the ApplicationController typically is not. Both are involved in dispatch and event processing. The former normally renders a view whereas the latter does not.
gniemcew wrote:
2.) Some CCS discussions seem to introduce Client-specific implementation details at the ApplicationController level, for example "HTTP requests" or "HTTP responses". It seems puzzling to me, since I feel that every part of the framework, except for a concrete FrontController, should be completely independent of the nature of a Client making a request. Instead, I created a generic Request object w/arguments and have a concrete FrontController translate any client-specific details into such a generic Request, before delegating to an ApplicationController.Generic is fine. However, you can become generic to the point where your Request and Response interfaces are only acting as "marker" interfaces (think of java.io.Serializable). Writing a truly generic controller is possible, but personally, I have never found the effort justified.
gniemcew wrote:
3.) In the light of the (2.) above, I am not sure what constitutes a "response" from an ApplicationController back to a FrontController. It seems to me that the only universal "response" is a LogicalViewEnumeration: what View to present once a command has been completed, in many cases a "don't care", or a "show the requestor", or a "show a home page" (not every request has to result in changing a View). Well, perhaps a LogicalViewEnumeration as well as possible View arguments (?).A given service (if you ascribe to SOA) should be the fundamental unit in your architectural design. A good application controller would be responsible for determining how to dispatch a given Command. Whether a Command pattern is used or whether service methods are invoked directly from your FrontController, the ApplicationController should enforce common service aspects. These include authentication, authorization, auditing, orchestration, validation, logging, error handling, just to name a few.
The ApplicationController should ideally offload these aspects from a given service. The service would indicate how the aspects are to be applied (e.g., strong authentication required, x role required, fetching of existing process state, etc.) This allows services to be developed more quickly and to have these critical aforementioned aspects developed and tested centrally.
Your FrontController, in contrast, is responsible for transforming whatever input it is designed to receive (HTTP form data posts, XML-RPC, etc.) and ensure that it honors the contract(s) that the ApplicationController establishes. There are no cut-and-dry decisions though about when a given piece of functionality should be ApplicationController or FrontController. Take error handling. Should I emit just a generic ServiceException or allow the FrontController to decide what to do with a more concrete checked exception? (The FrontController, in any case, should present the error to the user in a manner dictated by the protocol it serves).
gniemcew wrote:
4.) In the light of the (3.) above, I suspect that any failures in Request delegation, or Command execution, should be perhaps propagated back to a FrontController by exceptions only, since, say, a WebFrontController might want to show a click-through error page, when a SwingFrontController might prefer to show an error dialog box, a LogicalErrorViewEnumeration might not make sense at all in the context of a particular Client, for example a queueing Client.See above. Yes. However, the ApplicationController could easily 'hide' details about the failure. For example, any number of exceptions being mapped to a generic DataAccessException or even more abstractly to a ServiceFailureException. The ApplicationController could indicate whether the failure was recoverable and/or populate information necessary to speed up production support (e.g., mapping exceptions to error codes and/or providing a primary key in an error audit log table for support to reference). A given FrontController would present that information to the user in the method that makes sense (e.g., error dialog for Swing, error page for HTML, etc.)
gniemcew wrote:
5.) In the light of the (4.) above, there is the question of an appropriate Request interface (into an ApplicationController), an appropriate Response interface (back into a FrontController), as well as an appropriate ViewArguments interface (into a FrontController and later into a View). The problem with generic Requests is that they can be created with nonsensical argument combinations, so shouldn't Requests be abstract and force proper arguments in concrete subclasses, through explicit constructors (in a sense, degenerate Commands)? The problem with Responses and ViewArguments is that... well, I have not found any formal discussion anywhere as to what those should look like. In most samples I have encountered, Responses include Client-specific implementation details, as mentioned in (2.), above.See comment on marker interfaces above. Nothing, however, stops you from requiring a certain sub-type in a given service method. You can still pass in the interface and validate the proper type by an assert statement (after all, in the vast majority of situations, the proper service method should get the proper instance of a given Request object). IMO, the FrontController would create the Command instance which would be passed to the ApplicationController which would dispatch and invoke the proper service method. A model response would be received by the FrontController which would then render the appropriate view.
gniemcew wrote:
6.) Some CCS discussions seem to introduce a Flow Manager at the ApplicationController level. It seems puzzling to me, since the whole point of the Command and Controller Strategy flavor seems to be centralization of business logic execution within self-contained Command objects. Shouldn't Requests get associated with Handlers (objects capable of actually carrying out Requests) and transformed into Commands inside an ApplicationController, thus Commands themselves return appropriate LogicalViewEnumeration back to an ApplicationController, back to a FrontController? Let's consider a ShowMyShippingAddress request coming into the framework: unless such a Request is eventually treated as a Command returning a particular LogicalViewEnumeration, it is suddenly a Flow Manager "acting" as a business logic driver. I guess the question here is: except for a few special cases handled by a particular ApplicationController (authentication, error conditions, default behavior, etc.), should flow management be considered stand-alone, or always delegated to Commands?There are distinct kinds of flow management. For example, orchestration (or BPM) is properly at either the service or ApplicationController layers. However, determining which view to display is properly at the FrontController layer. The ApplicationController should receive a Command (with a populate Request) and return that Command (with a populated Response). Both the Request and Response are fundamentally model classes (within MVC). The FrontController is responsible for populating the Request and/or Command and rendering the Response and/or Command. Generic error handling is usually centralized for both controllers.
gniemcew wrote:
7.) Some CCS discussions seem to include an extra Request argument that specifies an ApplicationController to use (Request.Action="create", Request.Controller="account", Request.Username="me-me-me"), instead of using a Router inside of a FrontController to resolve to a particular ApplicationController through a generic action (Request.Action="createAccount", Request.Username="me-me-me"). I am not sure about the reason for such a design decision: why should a Client or a FrontController be allowed to concern itself with an implementation-level structure of the framework? Wouldn't any framework state -dependent ApplicationController resolution issues be best handled inside a Router, used by a FrontController to resolve [obtain] an appropriate ApplicationController, thus preventing Clients from ever forcing the framework into a possibly inconsistent behavior?I am not 100% sure of what you are getting at here. However, it seems to be the method by which commands are dispatched. They are in effect allowing a FrontController to dictate which of n ApplicationControllers should receive the request. If we allow a FrontController to directly invoke a service method, then the ApplicationController is simply a centralized framework that should always be invoked for each service method (enforced via AOP or some other mechanism). If there is a single, concrete ApplicationController which handles dispatch, then all FrontControllers communicate directly with that instance. It is really just a design decision (probably based on your comfort level with concepts like AOP that allow the ApplicationController to exist solely behind the scenes).
I might have totally missed your questions, but those are my thoughts on a Monday. Best of luck.
- Saish

Since I downloaded the newest update, my phone only rings or makes text sounds about 10% of the time. It can be sitting in front of me and a call or text comes in. No sound, just a msg on the screen. Anyone out there having that problem?

Since I downloaded the newest update, my phone only rings or makes text sounds about 10% of the time. It can be sitting in front of me and a call or text comes in. No sound, just a msg on the screen. Anyone out there having that problem? It's not a problem in the settings as I set the rings and tones I want. The rare one comes thru with sound. I never had any problems before update.

No, sounds like when you dropped it an cracked the screen it may have also damaged the logic board or the repair person damaged a cable.

DvForge mic plug and guitar plug

I just bought both the mic plug and guitar plug USB devices from DVForge. Their website made them sound pretty handy (close to no latency, better than CD quality recording), and I read no bad reviews.
Trouble is...they don't work. The mic plug gives me very quiet recording with hiss and horrible peaks. And the guitar plug gives me almost nothing at all.
Have I bought a pair of lemons? Or is something set up wrong? I'm using a sony F-VX650A mic, and a bog-standard semi-acoustic guitar. I notice that the mac recognises the device as "C-Media USB Headphone set" - whatever the **** that is.
Any ideas?

I'm a turkey. Just the input levels in system preferences. They work fine. Duh.
Incidently, the ** in "whatever the **" was subbed in for, wait for it, H..E..double hockey sticks. I apologize to the moderators for this uncharacteristically offensive turn of phrase. I shall adjust my language accordingly.

Scroll front panel left and right using control

I am taking an input from a chair rotation sensor (that just returns a voltage). I want to use this value to operate a control that scrolls the front panel left and right. Effectivively, the user would be able to navigate a wide control panel just using his chair.
So to summarise:
Does anyone know of a way to control the left and right scrolling motion of the front panel using a control?

Use the VI property "FP.Origin" to set the position of the panel in the window. To move the window position, use "FP.Winbounds".
LabVIEW, C'est LabVIEW

Front panel speaker and microphone ja

Hello all,
I wanted to know if it's possible to connect the front panel microphone and speaker jacks to my Audigy 4 sound card.
THx

jfp1 is on page 2/7 of the one i d/loaded pins 2 and 8

X-Fi Fatal1ty Front Mic (2) and

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for