X200s on Windows XP Pro - System process around 50% after Standby or Hibernate

I have an x200s with the SU9300 1.2Ghz processor. I'm running with a clean installation of Windows XP Pro. I noticed less-than-expected battery life and found that after leaving the computer on for a number of hours (let's say overnight) and returning from Standby or Hibernate, I find that my "System" process takes up around 20-55% but usually hovers at 49-50% when the machine is idle. The "System Idle Process" will take up the remaining 50%. This is observed in the Windows Task Manager.
On my x60s with a core duo processor (and all my other desktops and laptops) the System process will usually be 0% when idle and the "System Idle Process" will be at 99%.
A restart of the computer will fix this issue until I go into Standby or Hibernate again. I usually went for days and sometimes weeks without restarting my x60s. This issue will cause me to get 30% less battery life and will make my system slower to respond, even when I'm typing this post, for example.
Anyone have experience or thoughts on this? Thank you

Any thoughts from anyone out there?

Similar Messages

X240 window 8 Pro - system failed to start after update

Mircosoft pushed an update to my week old x240. After the update, I cannot load window8 pro any more . "Auto repair" says PC didn't start correctly. When I refresh PC , "the drive where Window is installed is locked Unlock the drive any try again." My BitLocker has been activated and Laptop was running fine before this update on 8/4/2014. Called Lenovo and Mircosoft, of course no help. PLEASE HELP!

Hello sir,
Here's what you need to do.
1. Enter into BIOS setup and set Virtualization as disabled and reboot system.
2. After booting windows 8, enter into Control panel and remove bluetooth driver.
3. Download and install Ralink Bluetooth driver version 9.2.101.10 (SP59632)
4. Reboot system and enable Virtualization Technology again.
Hope this helps.
I feel like asking for thumbs up after I tell you to mark my post as Kudos if it solves your problem.

Can I clean install a Windows 7 Pro System Builder on a Lenovo PC with Windows 8 preinstalled?

Hi. I would like to clean install windows 7 on a Lenovo PC that came with Windows 8 core preinstalled. I want to format the entire drive and remove windows 8 and clean install windows 7. I already tried the clean install of Windows 7 Pro to get all of my drivers in line, and now I would like to buy a Product Key.
Would a Windows 7 Pro System Builder work in my case? Would it work just as smoothly as a retail version? I understand that the System Builder is an OEM version that includes the Product Key, COA, and DVD) Just want to make sure before I buy the System Builder version of Windows 7 Pro. Thanks.
Grazzie
Solved!
Go to Solution.

that should be retail since it seemed to be used for pc upgrades either way your new system builder key should work. those are called refresh because they re-released them sincea bug was found in thier installers. Do you have any key in the computer atm? or is windows just waiting to be activated?
EDIT: its a good copy look here> http://www.heidoc.net/joomla/technology-science/microsoft/14-windows-7-direct-download-links
Should you want to use the DVD images permanently, and don't own a product key yet, you can order a Windows 7 OEM or retail version from Amazon. The OEM reinstallation versions contain a DVD with a product key just like the retail versions. They are significantly cheaper, but lack a proper box packaging, and don't include technical support by Microsoft. The OEM key will work with the Digital River downloads, so you can just pick the cheapest one. Sometimes better editions are the cheaper ones, so all of the following links to Amazon offers might be worth checking. I've already tried to find good deals for all editions and linked to them here:
I own a Y510p SLI, and Yoga 2 Pro

Windows 7 Pro not finding network connections after boot camp installation. Is there something special we have to do to get the network (wired and wireless) set up?

Any suggestions for getting the network connections working on Windows 7 Pro running on a Mac Min with OSX Lion?

tim-bob wrote:
Any suggestions for getting the network connections working on Windows 7 Pro running on a Mac Min with OSX Lion?
If you haven't yet installed the Windows Support Software, that's probably why, so install it now.

T410 & Windows 8 Pro 64bit - display black screen after wellcome screen

I'm using T410 and Windows 8 Pro 64 bit.
Sometime, when i boot start Windows, after Wellcome , the screen is black.
But when i press Ctrl+Alt+Del, its' appear Task Maneger...vv.v...... but when i try lo login, after then, it's re-appear Black Screen (with cursor)
I updated BIOS.
Display was updated by Windows 8 (not manual)
Please help me fix this issue.
Thanks !!!

Did you upgrade to Windows 8 or do a clean install?
W520: i7-2720QM, Q2000M at 1080/688/1376, 21GB RAM, 500GB + 750GB HDD, FHD screen
X61T: L7500, 3GB RAM, 500GB HDD, XGA screen, Ultrabase
Y3P: 5Y70, 8GB RAM, 256GB SSD, QHD+ screen

Migrating desktop from old Windows XP Pro system to new laptop with Windows 7

I have been happily running Palm desktop software 4.2.0 w/ HotSync 6.0.1 for a long time on an old system with XP Pro. Now I need to move everything over to a new laptop that has Windows 7.
Bluetooth is available if I want it but don't know how to decide. I've been happy with the cradle that has the USB connection and charge power.
So my question is how to set up on the new machine while retaining all my data and information (contacts, appointments, bookmarks, etc.) that I have now.
Should I download new versions of software etc?
Any advice will be much appreciated!
Post relates to: Palm TX

Please look at this link: http://forums.palm.com/palm/board/message?board.id=windows_hotsync&thread.id=53678
During the setup of Palm Desktop enter a username of 'test'. This way when you hotsync it will pull your data down to the PC.

TRYING TO IDENTIFY WHICH "BIT" MY WINDOWS XP PRO SYSTEM IS -- HELP!!

I JUST FOUND OUT ABOUT MS ENDING SUPPORT FOR WINDOWS XP IN APRIL AND I AM TRYING TO FIND OUT WHICH "BIT" SYSTEM I HAVE. BELOW IS A COPY OF MY SYSTEM INFO. IT APPEARS TO ME THAT MY "SYSTEM TYPE" IS A X86-BASED PC IS THIS THE INFORMATION
I'M LOOKING FOR? CAN SOMEONE PLEASE HELP ME? I'M NOT FINDING X32 BIT OR X64 BIT ANYWHERE. I'M ALSO GOING TO ATTEMPT TO UPDATE IT ALSO, WHICH THE LAST TIME I DID IT WAS MAJOR PROBLEMS AND VIRUSES, ETC. IT LOOKS LIKE THE SAME IS GOING ON WITH OTHERS. I GUESS
WHEN I FIND OUT WHAT "BIT" I HAVE, I'LL GO FROM THERE. HOPE TO JUST ADD MORE MEMORY -- IS THAT POSSIBLE?
OS Name Microsoft
Windows XP Professional
Version 5.1.2600 Service Pack 3 Build 2600
OS Manufacturer Microsoft Corporation
System Name COMPUTER_1
System Manufacturer Acer,Inc.
System Model Aspire 1350
System Type X86-based PC
Processor x86 Family 6 Model 10 Stepping 0 AuthenticAMD ~796 Mhz
BIOS Version/Date Acer 3A25, 4/2/2004
SMBIOS Version 2.3
Windows Directory C:\WINDOWS
System Directory C:\WINDOWS\system32
CAN SOMEBODY EMAIL ME AN ANSWER? I'M TRYING TO PACK TO MOVE, ALSO. TOO MUCH FOR 1 SMALL MIND TO HANDLE!!
MY EMAIL ADDRESS IS: [email protected]
THANKS SO MUCH FOR THE HELP -- I'M SURE I'LL BE BACK BEFORE THIS WHOLE THING IS OVER. CAN'T MS JUST OPEN AN ARCHIVES DEPT. AND NOT DISRUPT US NICE PEOPLE WHO JUST WORK AT THIS COMPUTER???
JULESINRABUN

x86 = 32 bit. I'd ask them more over here.
http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows
Regards, Dave Patrick ....
Microsoft Certified Professional
Microsoft MVP [Windows]
Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties or guarantees , and confers no rights.

Windows 7 Group Policy Processing - EventID 1058

I am having an issue with Windows 7 clients refreshing group policy. When I run gpupdate the user policy refreshes and the moves on to the computer policies but fails displaying the error below. Replication topology checks out, dcdiag returns
no errors and sysvol permissions look ok too. Curiously the same policies apply just fine on windows xp pro systems. The Domain Controller is running Server 2008 Enterprise Edt R2 SP1, I see no 1030 eventid's on the domain controllers as others
frequently report with this error. The domain is running at Windows Server 2003 functional level but I have creaded a PolicyDefinitions folder in the sysvol for admx files etc. Where to go from here? Does anyone have any suggestions/insight
as to what the issue may be?
The sysvol and the gpt.ini file is accessible from the Windows 7 client using UNC path.
Thanks in advance for any assistance given.
The error code listed is 0 which is not mentioned in this article
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/1456.aspx
## Error details
Log Name:      System
Source:        Microsoft-Windows-GroupPolicy
Date:          2/8/2012 2:38:09 PM
Event ID:      1058
Task Category: None
Level:         Error
Keywords:
User:          SYSTEM
Computer:      win7box.abc123.net
Description:
The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows attempted to read the file
\\abc123.net\SysVol\abc123.net\Policies\{EB062BE8-CAF6-47B4-9B8B-27A19268C520}\gpt.ini from a domain controller and was not successful. Group Policy settings may not be applied until this event is resolved. This issue may be transient and could be caused
by one or more of the following:
a) Name Resolution/Network Connectivity to the current domain controller.
b) File Replication Service Latency (a file created on another domain controller has not replicated to the current domain controller).
c) The Distributed File System (DFS) client has been disabled.
Event Xml:
<Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event">
<System>
    <Provider Name="Microsoft-Windows-GroupPolicy" Guid="{AEA1B4FA-97D1-45F2-A64C-4D69FFFD92C9}" />
    <EventID>1058</EventID>
    <Version>0</Version>
    <Level>2</Level>
    <Task>0</Task>
    <Opcode>1</Opcode>
    <Keywords>0x8000000000000000</Keywords>
    <TimeCreated SystemTime="2012-02-08T20:38:09.770740300Z" />
    <EventRecordID>3972</EventRecordID>
    <Correlation ActivityID="{24F60AA4-DC8D-4F6D-8787-9535072F03C0}" />
    <Execution ProcessID="996" ThreadID="1148" />
    <Channel>System</Channel>
    <Computer>win7box.abc123.net</Computer>
    <Security UserID="S-1-5-18" />
</System>
<EventData>
    <Data Name="SupportInfo1">4</Data>
    <Data Name="SupportInfo2">816</Data>
    <Data Name="ProcessingMode">0</Data>
    <Data Name="ProcessingTimeInMilliseconds">3354</Data>
    <Data Name="ErrorCode">0</Data>
    <Data Name="ErrorDescription">The operation completed successfully. </Data>
    <Data Name="DCName">DC.abc123.net</Data>
    <Data Name="GPOCNName">CN={EB062BE8-CAF6-47B4-9B8B-27A19268C520},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=abc123,DC=net</Data>
    <Data Name="FilePath">\\abc123.net\SysVol\abc123.net\Policies\{EB062BE8-CAF6-47B4-9B8B-27A19268C520}\gpt.ini</Data>
</EventData>
</Event>
## DCDiag Results (No RODC's hence NCSecDesc error )
Directory Server Diagnosis
Performing initial setup:
   Trying to find home server...
   Home Server = DC
   * Identified AD Forest.
   Done gathering initial info.
Doing initial required tests
   Testing server: North\DC
      Starting test: Connectivity
         ......................... DC passed test Connectivity
Doing primary tests
   Testing server: North\DC
      Starting test: Advertising
         ......................... DC passed test Advertising
      Starting test: FrsEvent
         ......................... DC passed test FrsEvent
      Starting test: DFSREvent
         ......................... DC passed test DFSREvent
      Starting test: SysVolCheck
         ......................... DC passed test SysVolCheck
      Starting test: KccEvent
         ......................... DC passed test KccEvent
      Starting test: KnowsOfRoleHolders
         ......................... DC passed test KnowsOfRoleHolders
      Starting test: MachineAccount
         ......................... DC passed test MachineAccount
      Starting test: NCSecDesc
         Error NT AUTHORITY\ENTERPRISE DOMAIN CONTROLLERS doesn't have
            Replicating Directory Changes In Filtered Set
         access rights for the naming context:
         DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=abc123,DC=net
         Error NT AUTHORITY\ENTERPRISE DOMAIN CONTROLLERS doesn't have
            Replicating Directory Changes In Filtered Set
         access rights for the naming context:
         DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=abc123,DC=net
         ......................... DC failed test NCSecDesc
      Starting test: NetLogons
         ......................... DC passed test NetLogons
      Starting test: ObjectsReplicated
         ......................... DC passed test ObjectsReplicated
      Starting test: Replications
         ......................... DC passed test Replications
      Starting test: RidManager
         ......................... DC passed test RidManager
      Starting test: Services
         ......................... DC passed test Services
      Starting test: SystemLog
         ......................... DC passed test SystemLog
      Starting test: VerifyReferences
         ......................... DC passed test VerifyReferences
   Running partition tests on : ForestDnsZones
      Starting test: CheckSDRefDom
         ......................... ForestDnsZones passed test CheckSDRefDom
      Starting test: CrossRefValidation
         ......................... ForestDnsZones passed test
         CrossRefValidation
   Running partition tests on : DomainDnsZones
      Starting test: CheckSDRefDom
         ......................... DomainDnsZones passed test CheckSDRefDom
      Starting test: CrossRefValidation
         ......................... DomainDnsZones passed test
         CrossRefValidation
   Running partition tests on : Schema
      Starting test: CheckSDRefDom
         ......................... Schema passed test CheckSDRefDom
      Starting test: CrossRefValidation
         ......................... Schema passed test CrossRefValidation
   Running partition tests on : Configuration
      Starting test: CheckSDRefDom
         ......................... Configuration passed test CheckSDRefDom
      Starting test: CrossRefValidation
         ......................... Configuration passed test CrossRefValidation
   Running partition tests on : abc123
      Starting test: CheckSDRefDom
         ......................... abc123 passed test CheckSDRefDom
      Starting test: CrossRefValidation
         ......................... abc123 passed test CrossRefValidation
   Running enterprise tests on : abc123.net
      Starting test: LocatorCheck
         ......................... abc123.net passed test LocatorCheck
      Starting test: Intersite
         ......................... abc123.net passed test Intersite

I shortened this down a good bit but here is the gist of it, my question is which context/user/account is being denied access to the .ini files?  I have never used the streams utility but I'll give it a whirl and report back what I get. Most of
the cannot be accessed are probably just policies that are not applicable to the machine but the gpt.ini errors are baffling me.
New GPO - it appears that new GPOs are fine
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:510 ProcessGPO: Searching <cn={5D0EF3CD-7942-4A89-A879-4F9FDB3064BF},cn=policies,cn=system,DC=abc123,DC=net>
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:510 ProcessGPO: Machine has access to this GPO.
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:510 ProcessGPO: GPO passes the filter check.
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:510 ProcessGPO: Found functionality version of: 2
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:510 ProcessGPO: Found file system path of: <\\abc123.net\SysVol\abc123.net\Policies\{5D0EF3CD-7942-4A89-A879-4F9FDB3064BF}>
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:510 ProcessGPO: Found common name of: <{5D0EF3CD-7942-4A89-A879-4F9FDB3064BF}>
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:510 ProcessGPO: Found display name of: <gpoC-Win7Test>
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:510 ProcessGPO: Found machine version of: GPC is 0, GPT is 0
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:510 ProcessGPO: Found flags of: 0
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:510 ProcessGPO: No client-side extensions for this object.
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:510 ProcessGPO: GPO gpoC-Win7Test doesn't contain any data since the version number is 0. It will be skipped.
Older GPO's - not so fine
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 EvalList: Object <CN={B34A8F23-269C-43D8-A097-2307729FBFF6},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=abc123,DC=net> cannot be accessed
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 ProcessGPO: ==============================
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 ProcessGPO: Searching <CN={55338992-95C9-4FA2-80E4-0ED4A623EE09},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=abc123,DC=net>
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 ProcessGPO: Machine has access to this GPO.
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 ProcessGPO: GPO passes the filter check.
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 ProcessGPO: Found functionality version of: 2
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 ProcessGPO: Found file system path of: <\\abc123.net\SysVol\abc123.net\Policies\{55338992-95C9-4FA2-80E4-0ED4A623EE09}>
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 ProcessGPO: Found common name of: <{55338992-95C9-4FA2-80E4-0ED4A623EE09}>
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 ProcessGPO: Found display name of: <gpoS-RealPlayerEnt6 - Security>
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 ProcessGPO: Found machine version of: GPC is 0, GPT is 0
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 ProcessGPO: Found flags of: 0
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 ProcessGPO: No client-side extensions for this object.
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 ProcessGPO: GPO gpoS-RealPlayerEnt6 - Security doesn't contain any data since the version number is 0. It will be skipped.
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 ProcessGPO: ==============================
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 EvalList: Object <CN={C92FD413-E891-47E0-B554-BD7F9209D036},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=abc123,DC=net> cannot be accessed
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 EvalList: Object <CN={FEF33797-46D0-452A-B3D7-0BEEC2330592},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=abc123,DC=net> cannot be accessed
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 EvalList: Object <CN={CCBFECA5-2FF8-4512-8CE4-108C4092D009},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=abc123,DC=net> cannot be accessed
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 EvalList: Object <CN={767959D5-7AB6-4D55-A02E-3F54439CC7DA},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=abc123,DC=net> cannot be accessed
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 EvalList: Object <CN={10DCAC5E-9904-41FF-B678-E8514F481E56},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=abc123,DC=net> cannot be accessed
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 EvalList: Object <CN={3229FD3D-868A-4406-AFAF-6449ADBB4749},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=abc123,DC=net> cannot be accessed
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 EvalList: Object <CN={1DD39B5C-B930-4750-8EC3-42D0FB89A3B9},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=abc123,DC=net> cannot be accessed
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 EvalList: Object <CN={E10350D2-F632-4D5E-9668-4151596B1D77},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=abc123,DC=net> cannot be accessed
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 EvalList: Object <CN={86C864C5-C861-42FC-B728-BAEE81C9A091},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=abc123,DC=net> cannot be accessed
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 EvalList: Object <CN={FE1162BF-9FE2-4F04-A514-80A8E6D5F7CD},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=abc123,DC=net> cannot be accessed
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 EvalList: Object <CN={F68214D3-33F3-4F76-BE26-306D0237A048},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=abc123,DC=net> cannot be accessed
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 EvalList: Object <CN={CA6B06CE-C546-41F1-87FB-9013701AEF00},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=abc123,DC=net> cannot be accessed
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 EvalList: Object <CN={C8C9EFA2-90AA-4162-9051-23FD83B5CF62},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=abc123,DC=net> cannot be accessed
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 EvalList: Object <CN={DE445C4F-9A0F-488F-8769-C041CF2184AA},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=abc123,DC=net> cannot be accessed
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 EvalList: Object <CN={7CDB465C-55AC-4CBC-9C18-F3ADACDFEB46},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=abc123,DC=net> cannot be accessed
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 EvalList: Object <CN={F4E0F78E-BE36-4793-A8B1-83B2D67083F1},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=abc123,DC=net> cannot be accessed
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 EvalList: Object <CN={53359F0A-8C9B-4831-936F-3D47C4CC2694},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=abc123,DC=net> cannot be accessed
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 EvalList: Object <CN={6793DBEE-47B0-458D-8F1C-D92EB7015733},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=abc123,DC=net> cannot be accessed
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 EvalList: Object <CN={93919120-7113-47C0-AA38-0561EAB18E42},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=abc123,DC=net> cannot be accessed
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 EvalList: Object <CN={5ABD1D9E-07E4-4A53-B854-A2FFC3B257CB},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=abc123,DC=net> cannot be accessed
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 EvalList: Object <CN={71E2B86C-A4A0-47C0-9D7F-BDD6220B9FA4},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=abc123,DC=net> cannot be accessed
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 EvalList: Object <CN={4401CF1C-7839-4496-BB87-304A8AB917FC},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=abc123,DC=net> cannot be accessed
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 EvalList: Object <CN={1244CA5A-D654-4ED6-9374-148F1F3DA8ED},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=abc123,DC=net> cannot be accessed
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 EvalList: Object <CN={42875CF2-B9E9-4EFA-90C2-7ACA8882F1B7},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=abc123,DC=net> cannot be accessed
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 EvalList: Object <CN={6DD428B6-6B19-4A53-B172-57DB3E15A38E},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=abc123,DC=net> cannot be accessed
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 EvalList: Object <CN={983BFDAD-65F0-42B4-807A-E78DF275C352},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=abc123,DC=net> cannot be accessed
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 EvalList: Object <CN={AFA31A2D-07D8-4CB4-BE86-067A9624E324},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=abc123,DC=net> cannot be accessed
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 EvalList: Object <CN={77C9CA17-6359-4355-9FDF-F605F0441245},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=abc123,DC=net> cannot be accessed
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 EvalList: Object <CN={75D43291-6FA2-4B98-8422-228DDB45571B},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=abc123,DC=net> cannot be accessed
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 EvalList: Object <CN={870C6FB3-74CD-46E8-9D4D-E6E6C0A2B52D},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=abc123,DC=net> cannot be accessed
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 EvalList: Object <CN={2144E4CF-01C1-4C5B-984B-E9BD4461406F},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=abc123,DC=net> cannot be accessed
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 EvalList: Object <CN={7D9DB917-1245-46BD-AEBF-163A2F0FCD06},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=abc123,DC=net> cannot be accessed
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 EvalList: Object <CN={B7431941-5DAA-4DD2-A569-35C31B92B677},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=abc123,DC=net> cannot be accessed
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 EvalList: Object <CN={D01BF1D1-33C8-4FC3-95C3-5948A1EE1647},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=abc123,DC=net> cannot be accessed
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 EvalList: Object <CN={57D4AD83-3BBF-43C2-9A3B-F71F3E52C2A6},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=abc123,DC=net> cannot be accessed
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 EvalList: Object <CN={A8DB7DAC-42F0-43FC-99E1-F1AC15006101},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=abc123,DC=net> cannot be accessed
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 EvalList: Object <CN={56574927-6DC5-48A7-82F9-A00E820335F6},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=abc123,DC=net> cannot be accessed
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 EvalList: Object <CN={2FB6858E-8B1C-4C89-83B2-0EEE97D9A72B},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=abc123,DC=net> cannot be accessed
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 EvalList: Object <CN={93C56E3F-5334-4325-A328-0CCAFED0828B},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=abc123,DC=net> cannot be accessed
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 EvalList: Object <CN={1B64E00F-D3B6-49B6-B6C8-7AD0A8C9AEFA},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=abc123,DC=net> cannot be accessed
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 EvalList: Object <CN={81B4E46C-8249-4547-BC75-9A1FB395E282},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=abc123,DC=net> cannot be accessed
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 EvalList: Object <CN={43D5184A-73C8-4BFD-9B09-33C70B8BC3C2},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=abc123,DC=net> cannot be accessed
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 ProcessGPO: ==============================
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 ProcessGPO: Searching <CN={0ABE0BCF-0BC5-481E-AC86-5768D00901D5},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=abc123,DC=net>
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 ProcessGPO: Machine has access to this GPO.
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 ProcessGPO: GPO passes the filter check.
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 ProcessGPO: Found functionality version of: 2
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 ProcessGPO: Found file system path of: <\\abc123.net\SysVol\abc123.net\Policies\{0ABE0BCF-0BC5-481E-AC86-5768D00901D5}>
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 ProcessGPO: Couldn't find the group policy template file <\\abc123.net\SysVol\abc123.net\Policies\{0ABE0BCF-0BC5-481E-AC86-5768D00901D5}\gpt.ini>,
error = 0x0. DC: DC2.abc123.net
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 ProcessGPO: ==============================
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 EvalList: ProcessGPO failed
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 GetGPOInfo: EvaluateDeferredGPOs failed. Exiting
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 GetGPOInfo: Leaving with 0
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 GetGPOInfo: ********************************
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 ProcessGPOs: GetGPOInfo failed.
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 ProcessGPOs: No WMI logging done in this policy cycle.
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:541 ProcessGPOs: Processing failed with error 87.
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:557 Application complete with bConnectivityFailure = 0.
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:557 Signalling 1 Refresh Policy callers
GPSVC(f84.df4) 12:43:27:557 Exiting RefreshPolicyForPrincipal with status = 0
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:557 GPLockPolicySection: Sid = (null), dwTimeout = 600000, dwFlags = 0
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:557 LockPolicySection called for user <Machine>
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:557 Sync Lock Called
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:557 Writer Lock got immediately.
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:557 Lock taken successfully
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:557 UnLockPolicySection called for user <Machine>
GPSVC(3e4.80c) 12:43:27:557 UnLocked successfully

Itunes 10.5 crashes with no error when trying to play any music, video, or import/scan from the library folder on the compter with Windows 7 Pro.

Fresh install with all older itunes un-installed as well as other Apple software.
Now cannot get any songs, videos, or even scan library folder for songs to work on the computer.
itunes just simply crashes with no error comments.
This is itunes 10.5 on a Windows 7 Pro system.

Same here, though on XP. Have tried cleaning registry, reinstalling, deleting preferences. Created a new user with no library and I have the problem there, too, so it's not the library.
Is there no one to call about this??

How to kill a system process on terminal

Be very careful when killing system process with this procedure, use it only if you really have no other choise:
1- Open Terminal
2- Type: top on the shell
3- Find the number of the process you what to terminate Exp: If you what to kill NortonMiss it will be display like this:
262 NortonMiss 0.0% 0:00.02 1 21 19 68K 540K 436K 27.5M
4- You can't kill this process, is system protected, you need to logon as superuser, to do this, open an other window of the shell and type:
sudo kill 262
(the number of the process is different on each session, and depending on the application or process you what to terminate)
5- You'll be ask for your password, type it and press enter, the app will be kill! (when typing the password, it will not be display on the screen). To cancel the kill press CTRL+Z
NOTES:
Some system process will reboot after they are killed, but this command is usefull if the process hang up, when is rebooted it will work again on most cases.
A superuser have access to all the process and has no restriction on the use of commands on UNIX. Be sure not to reveal the password of your computer to anybody, because if they logon as superuser on your mac, they can deleted any folder.
Use very caution on the use of the "sudo" command.
iMac (Summer 2001) 600Mhz RAM=384MB Slot loading Mac OS X (10.3.5) CD-RW, 40 GB hard drive, Slot loading CD-RW

Well, I only post this as one method, but I know that UNIX is a very flexible OS, so I'm sure there are more ways to kill a process, thanks for sharing them, and...
NifflerX, Thanks! I didn’t know that one, but I also like the top command, 'cause I can see the process activity as I work, useful to know if the process still hang-up or all of the sudden goes back to life like a nosferatu... hehehe. By the way... all that people that just got their macs after a PC with.... agggghhh... Windows XP (sorry I say that)... you will find that the top command is the counterpart of the Process Viewer that shows up by pressing CTRLALTDEL on the ugly PC keyboard.
Oh.,. And Daniel Macks, you can cancel the command with CTRL+Z when the prompt asks for your password, only at this point.
Thanks for the extra tips everyone!
iMac (Summer 2001) 600Mhz RAM=384MB Slot loading Mac OS X (10.3.5) CD-RW, 40 GB hard drive, Slot loading CD-RW

Win7 Pro system crashes repeatedly (B.S.O.D.)while running FF 9.0.1

Since installing FF 9.0.1 my Windows 7 Pro system has crashed (Blue Screen Of Death - BSOD) at least once daily while running Firefox. It does not do so while running any other application. I've run full system virus and malware checks with several apps - system appears to be clear. Windows is fully up to date and protected with Norton firewall and Norton On-line.

Perform the suggestions mentioned in the following article:
* [[Firefox crashes]]
Check and tell if its working.

Windows XP Pro doesn't recognize new hard drive on T61 thnkpad

Hard drive: 160GB 7200 RPM SATA
                    The Lenovo part number for the new hard drive on my invoice is: 41N5737
                    However, the sticker on the hard drive itself has this Lenovo part number: 42T1057
                    It is made by Hitachi.
Thinkpad: T61 (8891-CTO)
OS: Windows XP Pro SP2 (newly purchased, shrink-wrapped)
This thinkpad had Vista Home on it. I bought the new hard drive for the purpose of loading a just-purchased copy of Windows XP Pro SP2 on it (. After installing the new hard drive:
1. I turned on the machne and inserted the Windows XP CD.
2. Files from the CD (drivers, etc.) started being loaded (into memory, I guess).
3. Then got a prompt to select whether I'd like to install a new version of XP or restore an existing version.
4. I selected Install a new version.
5. Then I got a message saying Windows could not find a hard drive on my machine.
6. Then I restarted, and interrupted the restart to look at the BIOS config settings
7. I found the hard drive test function, and started the hard drive test.
8. It took a while, but the hard drive test was successful. So hard drive is OK, and the BIOS is aware of it.
How can I make Windows XP aware of my new hard drive?
Thanks for any help....
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Tdc3, welcome to the forum,
change the BIOS settings in Config > SATA to Compatibility Mode from AHCI.
Andy ______________________________________
Please remember to come back and mark the post that you feel solved your question as the solution, it earns the member + points
Did you find a post helpfull? You can thank the member by clicking on the star to the left awarding them Kudos Please add your type, model number and OS to your signature, it helps to help you. Forum Search Option T430 2347-G7U W8 x64, Yoga 10 HD+, Tablet 1838-2BG, T61p 6460-67G W7 x64, T43p 2668-G2G XP, T23 2647-9LG XP, plus a few more. FYI Unsolicited Personal Messages will be ignored.
Deutsche Community Comunidad en Español English Community Русскоязычное Сообщество
PepperonI blog

Windows 7 64 bit won't resume after being locked

Hello,
My Windows 7 Pro computer will not resume after being locked.
I use a Domain controller based on Windows server 2008 R2, and if I login with my username on any other PC, I do not have this Problem.
When I lock it to go out for some reason, it won't resume at all. I left it on the welcome screen for an hour or so, and it didn't start.
Do you guys have any idea what might be causing this ?
Thank you very much for your help

If this behavior is not exhibited on any other systems in your environment, I believe it's safe to assume the issue is with the local client.
First things first: check that you have the latest drivers for your system. I know this seems like a canned answer, but I've seen hundreds of cases where a missing or legacy disk controller driver causes all manner of strange behavior on an otherwise healthy
system.
Years ago, when SSDs first starting becoming popular, I purchased a handful of them from a specific vendor. We started seeing issues with resuming from S3 sleep that confounded us for months. We found out that the vendor used a specific brand and chipset
on their SSD controllers that wound up causing firmware faults when Windows was resumed; even to the point that we had to shut down the PC, unplug it, and let the caps drain before we could boot it again!
We wound up replacing the drives with a more mainstream/popular brand and the issues never happened again, but the problem was hardware related. Your post reminded me of those few months of confusion.
Check that all of your drivers are up to date, esp. disk and video, and don't rely on the Microsoft generic drivers. If you can find the drivers for your mobo/gfx cards, prefer that route.

GSM Phone capabilities on Windows 8.1 Pro system

Is it possible to have GSM phone (voice call) capability on a Windows 8.1 Pro system (e.g. a laptop/tablet with a GSM voice-capable mini PCI-E card such as Option's GTM671WFS)? And how would one go about getting it to work (assuming it is possible)? Is there
even any software that would support such functionality?
I'm asking because I work remote, and while I'm fine with a phone + desktop while at home I'd rather have a single work-device to lug around when on-the-road. As I always have both phone + laptop on me if I'm working, I figured I might as well see
if it would be possible to combine the two.
At this stage I'm considering battery life and other possible drawbacks as being irrelevant.
Anyhow, thanks in advance for any help in figuring this out.

Hello Yolanda,
I think there's been a bit of confusion as to my question. As far as I'm aware of, there's not a single GSM-capable WIndows (7, 8 or 8.1) "Pro" (ie full versions of Windows) tablet or laptop on the market atm (not with voice-call capability - at
least not advertised as such). Obviously, there are phones with Windows Phone 7,8 etc., but that's not what I'm interested in or looking at.
On the other hand, Skype, as far as I'm aware of, is not used to make calls on the GSM network, rather for calls over the internet - which again is not what I'm looking for.
What I'm asking is if it's possible (ie. if the full version of Windows somehow supports) regular GSM-network phonecalls, and if drivers and/or software exists to support this functionality - assuming one were to put in the necessary GSM-voice-call capable/supporting
mini PCI-E card (this being necessary as, afaik, there aren't any systems sold with this kind of card already built in). And, while I've seen such cards for sale, they're usually through wholesalers, (apparently) without drivers (at least not drivers that
I could find), nor have I been able to find software that makes use of such a card.
So, what all this boils down to is: Is it possible to, somehow, use my "full"-Windows laptop/tablet as if it were a regular phone, using the regular phone network, without needing an internet connection. I know - technically - the hardware exists,
but I haven't seen any drivers/software which seems to support it, and as as far as I know it's not built-in functionality in "full"-Windows.
Anyhow, hope this clarifies it.
Regards,
J.B.

I have Windows 8 pro on my computer . I un-installed itunes on my computer to re-install itunes 7.1.1 Now the system will not allow the re-install. Can anyone help?

I have Windows 8 pro on my computer . I un-installed itunes on my computer to re-install itunes 7.1.1 Now the system will not allow the re-install. Can anyone help?

I have an HP Officejet Pro 7580 similar to the 8600 you have and after upgrading to Mountain Lion it wouldn't work. HP support site said download updates for Mountain Lion from App Store not their site so I went to software update but there were NO UPDATES FOR 10.8. Tried a million things and could not get printer to work. So I restored back to Lion figuring at least printer worked then only now I can't get it to work with old settings either. I am sick to death of claims by Apple and peripheral manufacturers that everything is compatible all you have to do is get updates well in this case THERE ARE NONE TO BE GOT and I don't have time to **** about trying to find 'work arounds'. There shouldnt be a need for work-arounds. Unless the updates are ready DONT release the new OS. You shouldn't have to be an IT tech to make basic things like printing work. I see also the HP 8600 is even sold by appstore so there is no reason why it shouldn't work with minimum fuss.

X200s on Windows XP Pro - System process around 50% after Standby or Hibernate

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for