X201: Windows 7 install of SP1 removes KB2292867 (Hotfix)

Is there anyway of getting files from KB2292867 back on the machine after installing Service Pack 1 for Windows 7?
I noticed a tremendous boot performance increase after applying KB2292867, which lasted about 4 days. After 4 days, I installed Service Pack 1 for Windows 7, and the boot performance went back to the pre KB2292867 days.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

gan wrote:
Hi BigBossMan,
The 2292867 hotfix are included in service pack 1 so when you try to install this hotfix which is for Windows 7 without SP1 only you will see the "the update is not applicable to your computer" dialogbox. In other words no need to install this hotfix since it's part of SP1.
To see the list of included hotfixes and security updates in SP1 you can download the document "Hotfixes and Security Updates included in Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1.xls" using the link below.
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/details.aspx?FamilyID=61924cea-83fe-46e9-96d8-027ae59ddc11&dis...
Why you experience slow boot after installing SP1 i don't know, but seems to be related to something else since this hotfix is included in SP1. I do not see any slow boot issue on my computer after installing SP1.
-gan
I will keep an eye on the issue. It is a less consistent slow boot. I will have to track down the cause, but like said before pre SP1 post KB2292867. I did have noticable increase in performance. The theory at the moment is that the indexing process does not detect hard drive IO. I do have Power Protected Mode enabled. Maybe, Power Protected Mode misleads the indexing process about the amount of hard drive IO taking place.

Similar Messages

  • Get-Hotfix InstalledOn property not returning hotfix installed Date and Time on Windows Server 2008 SP2 but works on Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1

    Hi,
          I am working on a validation script to get the list of hotfixes installed on Domain Controllers every month as part of our monthly DC patching process. I have been successful in getting these details for DC's with (Windows Server 2008
    R2 SP1, Powershell v2.0) using the below command. 
    Get-HotFix -cn $computer | Select-Object PSComputerName,HotFixID,Description,InstalledBy,InstalledOn | where InstalledOn -ge (Get-Date -Day 1 -Format d) | FT -AutoSize
    I execute the above from a jump box with powershell v4.0 (Server 2008 R2)
    However, when I try the same command from the jump box to query DC's with (Server 2008 SP2, powershell v2.0). It doesn't return the InstalledOn date and time. It was giving error for the InstalledOn property and hence I renamed it to $_.InstalledOn. Now
    I don't get error but still no details displayed for InstalledOn property.
    I tried using the below, as could see on few forums that this might resolve the issue. I also tried removing the "where" part but still no installation date returned. 
    Get-HotFix -cn $computer | Select-Object HotFixID, Description, InstalledBy, @{l="InstalledOn";e={[DateTime]::Parse($_.psbase.properties["installedon"].value,$([System.Globalization.CultureInfo]::GetCultureInfo("en-US")))}}
    | where {$_.InstalledOn -ge (Get-Date -Day 1 -Format d)} | FT -AutoSize
    Have tried this locally on the 2008 SP2 DC but still not working. Please advise what is going wrong? 
    Note: If I execute the below command locally on the 2008 SP2 DC, I am getting the InstalledOn output. However, when executed from the jump box with powershell v4.0 (Server 2008 R2) to query
    the same 2008 SP2 DC, it just gives the prompt again without any error or output. This behavior is consistent for other 2008 SP2 DC's in the environment.
    Get-HotFix -cn $computer | Select-Object HotfixID,Description,InstalledBy,InstalledOn | where {$_.InstalledOn -ge (Get-Date -Day 1 -Format d)} | FT -AutoSize

    Hi jrv, I have already tried the Win32_QuickFixEngineering option, which doesn't work either. Apologies for not mentioning the workarounds that I have already tried.
    Get-Hotfix seems to be just a wrapper for Win32_QuickFixEngineering as per the below article. (http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh849836.aspx)
    I have seen a mention of using the WU ActiveX control on few forums, but was too lazy to read it through.
    After rigorous testing, it makes me realize that somewhere the Get-Hotfix dates formatting\comparison isn't working. 

  • Unable to install SQL server 2008 r2 standard edition on windows server 2008 r2 sp1

    I am unable to install sql server 2008 r2 standard edition on windows server 2008 r2 sp1.
     On the Setup Support Files page, choose Install this step I don't get any other window i.e. nothing happens I waited for 5-10 min.  Then I checked the log file.
    Final result:                  Failed: see details below
      Exit code (Decimal):           -2068053929
      Exit facility code:            1212
      Exit error code:               87
      Exit message:                  Failed: see details below
      Start time:                    2014-03-18 14:59:31
      End time:                      2014-03-18 15:00:25
    === Verbose logging started: 3/19/2014  9:45:47  Build type: SHIP UNICODE 5.00.7601.00  Calling process: E:\SQL Server 2008 R2 Standard\x64\setup100.exe ===
    MSI (c) (10:34) [09:45:47:496]: Note: 1: 2203 2: E:\SQL Server 2008 R2 Standard\x64\redist\watson\dw20sharedamd64.msi 3: -2147287038
    MSI (c) (10:34) [09:45:47:496]: MsiOpenPackageEx is returning 2.
    === Verbose logging stopped: 3/19/2014  9:45:47 ===
    Please help As i am running out of time as i have to upgrade TFS for that first step is to install SQL server.

    Hello,
    The following are a few things you can try:
    Copy the media to the local disk drive, unzip it (in case you are installing from an ISO file, and run SQL Server setup from there.
    Try to unregister and register the Windows Installer with the following two commands:
    msiexec /unregister
    msiexec /regserver
    Try to use Process Monitor to log the detailed error produced when the installation of dw20sharedamd64.msi fails. You can download Process Monitor from the following link:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb896645
    Share with us the error captured by Process Monitor.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Alberto Morillo
    SQLCoffee.com

  • Oracle 11g R2 install problem on Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1

    Hi all,
    Trying to install the Oracle 11g R2 database onto Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1.
    I get as far as running the setup and a black window flashes up on the screen and disappears.
    The log files only show the following:
    Using paramFile: C:\Temp\database\install\oraparam.ini
    Checking monitor: must be configured to display at least 256 colors. Actual 65536 Passed
    The number of files bootstrapped for the jre is 0.
    The number of files bootstrapped for the oui is 0.
    I've tried running setup -debug from the command line but no further information is logged.
    Any help in troubleshooting further is appreciated.

    That is the complete log file. No error messages or further information is given.
    I'm not sure how to check:
    Statement of Direction: Oracle Database 11g Release 2 – Microsoft Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 R2 [ID 867040.1]
    I have checked on:
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/install.112/e24283/toc.htm
    The server meets all the hardware requirements. The default file share is accessible and it is running a supported browser. The installer is being run with Admin rights. I'm not sure what else I need to check.

  • How can i remove a hybrid mbr from my system drive so that Efi booted windows will install.

    Hi,
    i have just clean installed OSX lion on a freshly wiped drive in my macbook pro, using a bootable lion installer usb i used disk utility to partition my drive into a mac and a windows partition under the GPT/GUID partition scheme, i then proceeded to install lion onto the mac partition, and completed the set up, All Good...
    so i plug in my Windows 8 EFI Boot USB stick (Notice, EFI boot here, NOT BIOS EMULATION BOOT), shutdown and power on the mac and proceed to the boot picker by holding option, So far so good, the usb key is recognised and the system boots into the Windows Setup in EFI mode, Enter product key, accept terms and so on, Now i select my Windows partition and windows Says That it cant install to Partition 4 (EFI Partiton, OSX Lion, Lion recovery, Windows), It says that it can only install to a GPT / GUID based disk as expected...
    Why is there a protective MBR on my drive when i didnt add one, and i have not even touched bootcamp assistant...
    How can i remove this Protective MBR from my drive so that my disk is PURE GPT so windows can install?
    hours of googling has turned up nothing...
    System:
    Macbook Pro 13 inch Mid 2009
    Mac os: OSX Lion
    Version of windows trying to install: Windows 8 Release Preview 64 bit in EFI Mode

    Alexander, I would like to apologize for the TERRIBLE answers you have been given so far.  I too had this question, and so here is what my thoughts are, as maybe they might provide insight in leading you towards the answer.
    I am a *nix user in general, and thus own a mac and a thinkpad.  In fact I just got my thinkpad not too long ago.  As such, I transfered my faster hard drive to my faster computer, which made logcal sense to me.  Ergo, I moved my Mac drive to my lenovo.  On this drive I have a hybrid mbr which is no longer needed.  So my thoughts are this:
    From what I gather, the UEFI standard indicates that there is to be a protective MBR on all GPT systems.  This is so that when you use programs that are not GPT aware, they will see a presumably "full" drive and not think that they have the right to destroy your existing data in what it thinks is free space.  For instance, fdisk or other MBR only partitioning systems.  Thus, if your system has only a MBR with a single EE partition, it would be my guess that it was in fact not put there by installing Windows, but rather for the protection of your system. 
    If you are in my situation, where you do indeed have a hybrid MBR with written out partitions, it would be my guess that the only way to rid yourself of it is to do it manually.  The way I would recommend, is using gdisk (gpt fdisk).  It is command line only, but the syntax is pretty easy:
    $ sudo gdisk /dev/disk0
    Assuming you are using your mac partition and your primary hdd is disk0.  That will put you into an interactive session of gdisk.  Enter "?" for command options.  What you need is the "recovery and transformation" section which is the "r" I think.  From there I would say you probably want to create a new hybrid mbr (you will be using this to delete it).  When it asks you for the partitions you would like to include, just hit enter.  It should then ask you if you would like to create a protective entry for the remainder of the empty space.  This is what you want so tell it to do that.  After you are done, "w" will write and exit.  You may want to first use the "p" to print and ensure that you have what you want.  You can proabably check your work by using fdisk as so:
    $ sudo fdisk -l /dev/disk0
    I hope this helps you, and if you find that there is a better way, I hope you might enlighten this thread. 
    Cheers!
    PS The command examples, the $ is to indicate it is a bash/shell command as a non-root user, do not include it in the command.

  • Unable to Install Windows Server 2012 on Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1 Hyper-V

    My attempts to install are failing with a message "Windows cannot install required files. The file may be corrupt or missing....Error code: 0x800705070".
    I am posting this on the Wondows 2012 Server forum but I have had exactly the same problem as described below with Windows 2008 R2 SP1.
    As the title says this is on a Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1 host with all current updates. I have downloaded the ISO file from a Technet subscription file twice, once by direct download and once by the Akamai downloader. The virtual disk is connected with
    the default IDE driver. I mounted both installation images as ISOs, located on a file system on the host server.  I have tried installs by deleting the VM and recreating both the VM and a new virtual disk, re-using a previously created virtual disk, and
    deleting the partitions in a previously created virtual disk, and executing the format command, and then attempting the install.
    I have exactly the same problem trying to create a Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1 VM on the same host OS.  With those attempts, I downloaded the Technet subscription iso 4 or 5 times, and burned one to a DVD which I attached to the created VM.  Same
    error message.
    The virtual machines and virtual disks I created and used were all located on an RAID5 array, on a builtin Intel RAID controller using Intel Rapid Storage Technology software version 11.2.0.1066.  The host Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1 uses this file system
    but the OS is installed on a dedicated drive (C).
    I had previously created a guest VM with Windows Server 2008 R2 (several months worth of updates ago) without drama.
    I have spent hours reading forums and blog articles on this.  A common response is to download the iso another time, and/or burn it to a DVD instead of mounting an iso image. Although I didn't do the later yet with 2012 Server, but I have done these
    other steps attempting to install Windows 2008 Server SP1. The install process takes a while (not to mention doing multiple downloads). Given this seems to be a common recommended remedy, and indeed based on posts does seem to eliminate the problem is some
    cases, why doesn't somebody change the Microsoft installer program so it does a thorough integrity check at the beginning of the install process?

    Jeff,
    After the exercise of Windows 2012 Server successfully installing (as I described above) I also successfully installed Windows 2008 R2 on Hyper-V.  From my standpoint, I have eliminated the problem (which isn't the same as correcting the problem).
    The answer to your specific question regarding Hyper-V support is that the motherboard I am using, an Asus P5Q, is not supported by Windows 2008 R2 because it doesn't use ECC memory, and the vendor doesn't say it supports Windows 2008. But I am sure you
    know the motherboard vendors often don't test older motherboards with newer software versions.  It appears that in specifying ECC memory Microsoft is trying to protect users of Windows Server from hurting themselves, not saying the software won't run.
    Having said that, my suspicion in the beginning was, and still is, that it was some variable(s) left in an unknown state in the Hyper-V environment, which was why after trying to install Windows 2008 R2 several times I tried Windows 2012 which resulted in
    the same error, and then encountered the same error trying to install Windows 7 on the same Hyper-V installation. The specific Hyper-V Windows 2008 R2 server had run without any operating problems for months before I started having trouble, and although it
    had been quite a while since I had created VMs, that process used to work.  The hardware didn't change. What changed was applying updates through Microsoft Update, and a few access control rights I changed, and at least I think, I set back to their original
    value.
    So in short, no, my hardware isn't supported by Windows 2008 Server.  Two, your assertion that you are running the same software configuration that I am is very unlikely to be true. There are an extremely large number of things which are different between
    your test system and mine, such as which Windows 2008 components are installed, what updates were installed and in what order they were installed, and what other third party software each of us is running, and between AD, and all the features, a large number
    of potential differences in ACLs, options, etc. and I don't for a minute think this particular problem was caused by the underlying hardware.
    I do appreciate your taking the time to try to help me, and I hope there is one thing you and I could agree on. Microsoft could pretty easily make it much easier to isolate problems. In this day and age reporting hex error codes (as opposed to doing the
    table lookup in the error handling proc), and not providing more diagnostic information seems to me to be almost quaint.  And in this case Microsoft can dismiss my problems on the grounds it was all on unsupported hardware. Unfortunately, I think they
    are missing an opportunity to make their software better, because in my opinion what I encountered there are a set of conditions which will cause installations to fail that aren't going to get corrected.

  • Getting error while trying to install ADRMS role on Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1.

    Hello,
    I am trying to install ADRMS on Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1 (This machine also has domain controller and Exchange Server 2010 SP3 installed). But I am getting following error:
    Install-ADRMS : The configuration object is read only, because it has been committed by a call to ServerManager.CommitChanges().
    If write access is required, use ServerManager to get a new reference.    at Microsoft.Web.Administration.Configuration.SetDirty()
    Not sure what is causing this error. Any help to solve it would be appreciated.
    Thanks.
    Jigar Mehta

    Hello,
    I am trying to install ADRMS on Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1 (This machine also has domain controller and Exchange Server 2010 SP3 installed). But I am getting following error:
    Install-ADRMS : The configuration object is read only, because it has been committed by a call to ServerManager.CommitChanges().
    If write access is required, use ServerManager to get a new reference.    at Microsoft.Web.Administration.Configuration.SetDirty()
    Not sure what is causing this error. Any help to solve it would be appreciated.
    Thanks.
    Jigar Mehta

  • Windows Vista Home Prem SP1, iTunes 76, after install, refuses to launch

    I have just resinstalled Windows Vista Home Premium to a 1 yr old Acer 5610 laptop.
    Installed Vista SP1.
    Downloaded and installed latest (v7.6.something) iTunes and let it do the full, all apple media installation. It seemed OK, showed his music, let us reactivate the computer and loginto iTunes store.
    But now, one day later, when he starts computer, it refuses to lauch when iTUnes is clicked. just acts as if nothing was happening.
    So tried to uninstall iTUness and planned to do a reinstall, but now the uninstall has been running 30 minutes and seems to be doing nothing.
    Any thoughts on what is going on here?
    Should I force the uninstall by using a 3rd party Uninstaller tool?
    Should I download iTunes + Quicktime separately as EXE and run the installer again (I have downloaded it (57MB) to my Mac and plan to take it over to the Vista laptop on Monday when i am there again).
    Any other thoughts on why it worked once after the install and now has gone silent?
    thanks!

    Well that's weird that it quit working. Was that the first time the PC had been restarted since a lot of stuff got installed?
    The uninstall shouldn't take more than a min or so.
    Use the Microsoft Installer Cleanup Tool:
    http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;290301
    Norton or other security software can cause that, there are several other reasons too...

  • Error when try to install exchange Server 2013 in windows server 2008 R2 Sp1

    Hi
    I'm getting these errors while trying to install Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 on my Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1 the user i'm using is the Administrator and it is already a member of "Enterprise
    Admins" and "Schema Admins"
    in my organization there is 6 Exchange server 2013 in 3 site windows server 2012 in this case
    I have to install exchange 2013 in windows Server 2008 r2 sp1
    the functional level  2008 R2 I getting these errors please help.
    Errors:
    This computer doesn't belong to a valid Active Directory site. Check the site and subnet definitions.
    For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.InvalidADSite.aspx
    Error:
    A reboot from a previous installation is pending. Please restart the system and then rerun Setup.
    For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.RebootPending.aspx
    Error:
    There is a pending reboot from a previous installation of a Windows Server role or feature. Please restart the computer and then run Setup again.
    For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.PendingRebootWindowsComponents.aspx
    Error:
    You must be a member of the 'Organization Management' role group or a member of the 'Enterprise Admins' group to continue.
    For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.GlobalServerInstall.aspx
    Error:
    You must use an account that's a member of the Organization Management role group to install or upgrade the first Mailbox server role in the topology.
    For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.DelegatedBridgeheadFirstInstall.aspx
    Error:
    You must use an account that's a member of the Organization Management role group to install the first Client Access server role in the topology.
    For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.DelegatedCafeFirstInstall.aspx
    Error:
    You must use an account that's a member of the Organization Management role group to install the first Client Access server role in the topology.
    For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.DelegatedFrontendTransportFirstInstall.aspx
    Error:
    You must use an account that's a member of the Organization Management role group to install or upgrade the first Mailbox server role in the topology.
    For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.DelegatedMailboxFirstInstall.aspx
    Error:
    You must use an account that's a member of the Organization Management role group to install or upgrade the first Client Access server role in the topology.
    For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.DelegatedClientAccessFirstInstall.aspx
    Error:
    You must use an account that's a member of the Organization Management role group to install the first Mailbox server role in the topology.
    For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.DelegatedUnifiedMessagingFirstInstall.aspx
    Error:
    Setup encountered a problem while validating the state of Active Directory: Could not find information about the local site. This can be caused by incorrect configuration of subnets or sites or by replication latency.  See the Exchange setup log for more
    information on this error.
    For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.AdInitErrorRule.aspx
    Error:
    Either Active Directory doesn't exist, or it can't be contacted.
    For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.CannotAccessAD.aspx

    I think it's from subnet in site and services
    have 3 site A,B,C and new site is  "D"I have problem in "D" site
    A subnet is 10.33.50.0/24  AD 2012 ,exchange 2013
    B subnet is 10.35.50.0/24 AD 2012 ,exchange 2013
    C subnet is 10.36.50.0/24 AD 2012 ,exchange 2013
    D subnet is 10.100.100.0/25 AD 2008 ,exchange 2013 error when install it
    find event error
    The description for Event ID 6 from source MSExchange CmdletLogs cannot be found. Either the component that raises this event is not installed on your local computer or the installation is corrupted. You can install or repair
    the component on the local computer.
    If the event originated on another computer, the display information had to be saved with the event.
    The following information was included with the event:
    test-SetupPrerequisites
    {Roles={LanguagePacks, Bridgehead, ClientAccess, UnifiedMessaging, Mailbox, FrontendTransport, Cafe}, LanguagesAvailableToInstall=True, DomainController=, CustomerFeedbackEnabled=True, ExchangeVersion=15.0.847.32, LanguagePackDir=D:\Exchange
    Server Software, SufficientLanguagePackDiskSpace=True, ADInitError=Setup encountered a problem while validating the state of Active Directory: Could not find information about the local site. This can be caused by incorrect configuration of subnets or sites
    or by rep, ScanType=PrecheckInstall, LanguagePackVersioning=True, HostingDeploymentEnabled=False, TargetDir=C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V15, SetupRoles={LanguagePacks, AdminTools, Bridgehead, ClientAccess, UnifiedMessaging, Mailbox, FrontendTransport,
    Cafe}}

  • On Windows Vista, installed AdobeAir update as required. "Mandatory Upgrade" removed Acrobat!

    On Windows Vista, installed AdobeAir update as required. Next screen said "Mandatory Upgrade" & when I clicked on it, version 2.0 of Acrobat was removed, new version 3.2 wouldn't download error# 16820! What do I do now? Need Acrobat, but I don't know what to do next! I'm working at a small church w/no budget. so please help if you can.

    Vista requires AA8.1 at a minimum. I think that a few have gotten AA7 to work, but it is not supported by Adobe on VISTA. I know that is not good news, but it may be that you will be unsuccessful. At the very least, expect to have to print to file and open distiller to complete the conversion. I think that AcroTray is one of the major problems with the use on VISTA.
    Hopefully someone might stop by that has successfully gotten over the registration problem you are having, and possibly gotten AA7 to work in some sense on VISTA, but do not be surprised if there are no takers. Good luck.

  • 'Windows cannot install required files' error while installing Vista SP1

    I'm installing Vista Client SP1 on my Macbook pro and getting the following error:
    Windows cannot install required files. Make sure all files required for installation are available, and restart the installation.
    Almost exactly as described in this KB article: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/930984/ except my error code is 0x80070017. I'm double-checked CRC on my dvd to ensure it's not corrupt. Also I've previously successfully installed Vista SP1 from the SAME DVD on a different Mac Leopard (desktop)
    Any ideas? This is a new Macbook pro, just got it yesterday. Could be DVD drive issue?
    Thanks!

    Did you get far enough to delete the FAT partition BootCamp created, so you could create a new NTFS one?
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/933925
    or this:
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1464025&tstart=0

  • How to install bo xi 3.1 on windows server 2008 r2 sp1 (virtual machine )

    HI GUYS --
    operating system: I am trying to install Business Objects into a virtual  computer which has a windows server 2008 R2 SP1 operating system. I installed version BO XI 3.1 and I also installed Service pack 3 and Service pack 4. I installed liveoffice usual way. Whenever I try to design  xcelsius and dashboard, I got some errors. In order to fix these errors, I followed SAP notes step by step. However, It didnt help me at all. I also tried to install by looking at install guide and supported platform documents, but I get an error each time of doing that. I can write each error over here. I also opened a link over here. Check out the link please to see the errors how to display webi docs. in liveoffice?
    My main question is this.
    Are there anybody who works operating system windows server 2008 R2 SP1 and this installed into the virtual machine? If so, Is it worked by doing which installations exactly?
    Note; Business Objects tools work very well (infoview, cmc, web intelligencei and the others work  without problems at QAAWS BO XI 3.1, but they have been given cluster error at BO XI 3.1 SP3) . In addition, port server settings have been installed based on the installion guide. If you give me any information other than whatever I said, I appreciate that. I also point out something. If I dont get any message which I attached a sample when I try to operate life office. In this situation I cant see either my documets or web documents in infoview)
    [http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/3/sorunc.jpg/|http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/3/sorunc.jpg/]

    Hi SYaGCi,
    Denis is right this is actually documented in the Supported Platforms Documentation:
    "Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 R2 are new platform support additions in Service Pack 3 which are only available for support on the SP3 full release install of SAP BusinessObjects Enterprise. The SP3 patch only release of SAP BusinessObjects Enterprise does not provide support for these two new platforms."
    Kind regards,
    John

  • Does installing Desktop Experience on Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1 slow down the server / increase processor usage?

    Hello.
    I'm running a tekkit classic (Minecraft) Server on a dedicated server I got from OVH, Im just wondering - Im currently using ClamAV for an antivirus, But I would like windows defender.
    Im wondering if installing Desktop Experience on my dedi would increase processor usage or slow down the dedi even slightly.
    System Specs:
    RAM: 32GB DDR3 ECC 1600MHz
    CPU: Intel Xeon E3-1245v2
    HDD: 2x2TB SATA (Both used, specified as different drives)
    OS: Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1
    Theres only 1 indev tekkit server currently running on there, Im getting 0-5% processor usage. I may be setting up more modpack servers  - but im wondering if installing desktop experience would increase the processor usage or slow the dedi down.
    Thanks.
    Joseph

    Hi Joseph,
    This is the forum for Microsoft BizTalk Server, you've asked your question in the wrong forum.
    I suggest posting your question in the Windows Server forum
    http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/home#forum=winserver2008appcompatabilityandcertification&filter=alltypes&sort=lastpostdesc&content=Search
    Glenn Colpaert - MCTS BizTalk Server - Blog : http://blog.codit.eu

  • Unable to install the security patches KB2677070 in Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1 (The update is not applicable to your computer)

    Dear everyone, 
    We are trying to install the below KB in our windows server 2008 R2 SP1, however, it will show "The update is not applicable to your computer". There is no problems to install the other patches except this one. Do anyone have idea about it?
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2677070
    Thanks,
    Users

    Hi,
    According to this KB article, there are many exceptions where this KB is not applicable.
    Please perform the following steps:
    Expand the “For all supported…” title in the File Information section in the KB article.
    Find Crypt32.dll.mui files on your machine.
    Then compare the file version, file size, data and time with the ones listed in the KB article.
    If there is a match, then this KB doesn’t apply to your machine, which is by design.
    Hope this helps.
    Best Regards,
    Amy Wang

  • How to install windows server 2012 r2 without remove the current windows 8.1

    how to install windows server 2012 r2 without remove the current windows 8.1

    Use guide below to convert it to 'basic' disk, or install windows on another drive. The supported way is to delete all partitions and convert it to a basic disk.
    https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc755238.aspx
    However, your windows 8.1 must be on another drive?, as windows cannot boot from a dynamic disk.
    Best Regards,
    Jesper Vindum, Denmark
    Systems Administrator
    Help the forum: Monitor(alert) your threads and vote helpful replies or mark them as answer, if it helps solving your problem.

Maybe you are looking for