X3100&NVS140M graphic card,which one can take more quickly in ultiboard Show 3D?

anyone can tell me,X3100&NVS140M graphic card,which one render speed more quickly,in ultiboard show 3D?
Actual,I used nvs140m graphic card more slowly than x3100 graphic card obviously.It's right or not?

I don't think anyone will be able to definitely tell you that one particular graphics card will be better than the other. There are just too many factors. The only way to tell would be to test over and over, and even then, you may not get consistent results.
Garret
Senior Software Developer
National Instruments
Circuit Design Community and Blog
If someone helped you, let them know. Mark as solved or give a kudo.

Similar Messages

OSB vs SOA- which one can take max load in terms of req/resp traffic

Hi,
I have few basic questions about load taking capacity of OSB and soa.
1. Is there any oracle doc stating how much traffic OSB or SOA components(bpel, mediator etc.) can take in terms of request/response per hour with certain infrastructure?
2. Diff in java callout in bpel and in osb?
3. Which one is more stable product in high load situation eg. 2 lac req/resp per hour.
4. Is there a link between number of javacallouts and performance in OSB and in SOA.
Regards,
SOA Enthusiast.

Hi Saurabh,
Interesting challenge... As I said before it's unlikely you will find stats as you want, this type of study is very particular to a use case, platform and infrastructure... There's no generic magical number...
I can say that OSB is lightweight and scalable and I would be surprised if it would become a bottleneck if running in a well dimensioned hardware... The bottleneck is typically at the external system... I also believe that if you add SOA Suite in the picture you will be adding overhead rather than enhancing performance, you should add SOA Suite if you need capabilities like audit, traceability, recovery and so on that you won't have with OSB alone... There's an old study on the link bellow but I'd doubt it would apply for your case, but may be helpful anyway...
http://biemond.blogspot.com.au/2009/06/osb-esb-performance-comparison.html
Dimensioning hardware is always a challenge... I recommend you to write a typical service and a worst scenario service and use a tool like jmeter to test how much throughput you can get from your infrastructure... Java callouts and complex xml transformation processing are points to be highlighted... Use a clustered OSB topology so you can easily add new nodes if needed...
Cheers,
Vlad

Mac Pro with two graphic card each one with two dvi output, can I extend deskop to three outputs?

Mac Pro with two graphic card each one with two dvi output, can I extend deskop to three outputs?

MAC OS 10.7.4 3.2GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon processors, 12GB of 800MHz DDR2 and 2 ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT 256MB (two dual-link DVI ports) . The problem is, I woul like to use one output as main and the three others as secondary or extended desktop but the system don't allow me use two diferent video cards this way.

Hardware missing -AGP Graphics card. How can I get my FCE 4 working on the new computer? Cheers

Hi I have just upgraded my computer to Mac OSX 10.6.7 now I cant open my FCE 4. Message reads, Hardware missing -AGP Graphics card. How can I get my FCE 4 working on the new computer? Cheers

Thanks, just so I know we are talking about the same items please let me know - When you say "run Prokit" do you mean downloaded? Which I did. I dont have Prokit 4.0.1 if you are referring to that, do I need this first? Please explain what application name I am looking for if other than Prokit which is sitting in my "download folder" do I need to manually put it into the apps folder? Sorry if the questions are layman but this area is not a very strong point for me. Thanks for your help so far.

I have 2007 mac pro i need a new graphic card what kind can i use?

have 2007 mac pro i need a new graphic card what kind can i use?

http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1345150
http://blog.macsales.com/6856-owc-reveals-which-radeon-video-cards-work-with-200 6-2009-mac-pros

My graphics card which is supported doesn't get recognised

My graphics card which is supported doesn't get recognised.
I tried updating the driver of the graphics card which is a NVIDIA 2000D and it didn't help.
Maybe someone has a idea what it can be??

Same here. Using W7Pro 64-bit
Recognized in Photoshop CS6
Not recognized in Photoshop CC

Suppose one lack records having in BDC uplaod,which one can i propose uploa

Suppose one lack records having in BDC uplaod,which one can i propose uploading these records?call transaction or session method which one is better?How?

Hi Hassan,
The Session method is better and used for processing large amount of data and it will give error log itself if any comes. and the other thing is you can run session method in background but call transaction is not possible to run in background.
Session method can handle multiple transactions at a time, while in call transaction , only one at a time.
But call transaction is much faster than Session.
Database update is synchronous in Session,while it is either synchronous or asynchronous in Call Transaction.
here is the exact differences..
Call transaction:
Session is used to handle larger amount of data and error handling in implicit, while in call transaction, you have to explicitly handle error situation.
1.Synchronous Processing
2.You can update the database both synchronously and asynchrounously.
3.Transfer of data for individual transaction
4.No batch input session is created.
5.Faster than other batch input techniques.
6.No automatic error log and restart capability is available here.
7.Not recommended for bulk data transfer
Session.
1.Asynchronous Processing
2.Synchronous database updates
3.Transfer of data for multiple transaction
4.Batch input sesssion is created here.
5.Automatic error handling and efficient restart capability incase of error transaction.
6.SAP's standard approach for data transfer
7.Highly recommended for Bulk data transfer.
8.Execution is slower than CALL TRANSACTION.
for details you can go thru this link
BDC
Please go thru this link.
Reagrds,
Amit.
Reward points if useful

Which ones can be deactivated?

I have three/four different versions of my Adobe installed on my computer. 5.5, CC, CC (64-bit), and CC (2014)
I do not believe that I need all these versions on my computer. (Only the CC and CC (2014) appear on the creative cloud).
Which ones can I uninstall, I only want to use the most relevant version.

The most recent is the CC 2014. Any other than that is earlier material. CC2014 replaced CC... CC replaced anything prior to it, though some people prefer to retain the CS versions if the applications they use were drastically changed between CS and CC releases... Flash is one such animal where they discontinued numerous useful features, some which cannot be done without having the older CS version(s) available.

Looking to replace my Mac Pro 2.1 graphics card with one that is silent with at least 2 DVI outputs (needed for audio production), any recommendations?

Looking to replace my Mac Pro 2.1 graphics card with one that is silent with at least 2 DVI outputs (needed for audio production), any recommendations?
Thanks

Thanks, but are these are silent?
Why do they cost over 10 x what seems available for PC?
Is it not possible to flash the cards for mac?
Something similar to a ASUS Geforce 8400GS PCI-E 2.0 512 MB DDR2 Graphics Card EN8400GS Silent/P/512M?

Hello,i have graphics card with displayport,can i connect my imac 21.5 (2012) to pc?

Hello,i have graphics card with displayport,can i connect my imac 21.5 (2012) to pc(via displayport)?
I want imac as monitor

Sorry, no, mid 2011s & up need Thunderbol...
http://support.apple.com/kb/TS3775

AppleCare for Macbook - Which one can I use M8852LL /A or /B ?

AppleCare for Macbook -
Which one can I use M8852LL /A or /B ?
/A is older version /B newer version , I think both are good for Macbook, but can't get a definite answer from Apple. Anyone here know ?
Macbook 1.83 Mac OS X (10.4.7) Combo Drive, 2G, 120G HD

more to say...
Deciding factor should be price.I've found these folks have the best price on AppleCare.
http://lacomputercompany.com
Jim
PowerBook G3 500 Mhz "Pismo"/ 2.0Ghz BlackBook 2GB OWC RAM Mac OS X (10.4.7)

Which one will give more power C2D 2.93 vs i5 2.4

Any one can inform me which one will give more performance MBP C2D 2.93 with NVIDIA GeForce 9400M + 9600M GT with 512MB or MBP i5 2.4 with 330M 256MB
I want it for photos and movies editing ?

Why don't you just go read some benchmarks?
http://www.barefeats.com/mbpp18.html

File Adapter or File Transport which one will give more performance

Hi all,
File Adapter or File Transport which one will give more performance ? in OSB?
Which one to select any one did performance analysis?
Thanks
Phani

Why don't you just go read some benchmarks?
http://www.barefeats.com/mbpp18.html

Can I put the Graphics card from one of my Asus laptops into another?

I have an Asus U56E and I want to put the graphics card from my Asus G51V into it, and I've scoured the internet and even called the geek squad to no avail, no one seems to be able to answer my question. If anyone could help it would be appreciated.

Generally with laptops you cannot remove/replace the graphics chips because they are integrated into the main board and are not a seperate component that can be swapped out. Some of the really high end laptops are starting to use modular cards but I do not believe that will be the case with your laptops. You may want to contact Asus for a more definate answer.
Geek Squad Precinct 1024
Deputy Counter Intelligence

Use of 2 graphic cards vs. one

I managed to get with my son at the office today and performed some limited testing to check out the new Premiere CC 2014 using a Sapphire Radeon HD 7950, Single and dual Nvidia K5000s in a MP5,1 and Dual D700s in a MP6,1. The results were interesting and revealing IMO.
All hardware was running latest 10.9.3.
The test goal was simply to Export a timeline (rendering implied here) on every graphic card combination.
Here's what hardware/software we had on hand
1) A MP5,1 - 12core 2.93 GHz, 64GB RAM, 480GB PCIe SSD for OS/Apps, 240GB RAID-0 2x 3G SSDs for Application's cache, single 7950 driving 30" ACD, 23" ACD and 60" TV.
2) A MP5,1 - 12core 2.93 GHz, 64GB RAM, 240GB PCIe SSD for OS/Apps, 240GB RAID-0 2x 3G SSDs for Application's cache, dual Nvidia K5000s in Slots 1 & 2 with Slot 2 driving a 27" Apple LCD.
3) A MP6,1 - 12core 2.7 GHz, 64GB RAM, 1TB PCIe SSD, Dual D700s, 21:9 34" LG display, 23" ACD and 46" TV.
4) Adobe Premiere CC 2014
We tested the MP5,1 that had dual K5000s, using both and using just one... using CUDA and OpenCL.
We used the MP5,1 with 7950 to test just OpenCL (CUDA not available with 7950).
We used the MP6,1 with dual D700s using OpenCL.
We used MP5,1 with the K5000s using CPUs (Software) for exporting the timeline.
Times are Minutes:Seconds
MP5,1 Dual K5000s, CUDA: 4:16
MP5,1 Dual K5000s, OpenCL: 4:13
MP5,1 Single K5000, CUDA: 4:15
MP5,1 Single K5000, Software: 5:02
MP5,1 Single 7950, OpenCL: 7:06
MP6,1 Dual D700s, OpenCL: 3:31
a) On the face of it the MP6,1 using Dual D700s did well against the dual K5000s in the MP5,1 -- 3:31 vs. 4:16.
b) On the MP5,1 using Dual K5000s vs. Single K5000 was a wash. This surprised me and I wonder if there's a Preference configuration that needs to be explored/discovered. I presumed the Adobe software would be aware of there being two K5000s vs. one graphics card. I could not find anywhere in the Preference setting to indicate there were dual graphics cards and simply assumed Adobe software would know about it... so pressed on with the testing.
c) On the MP5,1 using CUDA or OpenCL was a wash. They had essentially the same times.
d) On the MP5,1 using CPUs for exporting took longer than using the graphic card.
e) Using the MP5,1 and 7950 was considerably slower than using the dual or single K5000. Using 7950 took 7:06 vs. K5000 took 4:13. Thus K5000 was around 1.75 faster.
f) Using the MP6,1 and dual D700s beat them all with a time of 3:31. Son & I were happy to see this result.
Thus we have for OpenCL
MP6,1 D700 at 3:31
MP5,1 K5000 at 4:13
MP5,1 7950 at 7:06
Son now has to decide on keeping a K5000 for one of his MP5,1s as it does run 1.75 times faster than the 7950.
Of course this was a very small limited set of tests, and more testing needs to be done.
BTW... Export times can be obtained from the Premiere NOTES so it's not necessary to keep an eye on the elapsed time for the exporting which goes poof when the export completes. The NOTES provides the "Encoding Time: 00:04:15" for example.
Do you have any advice or some insights on what further testing can be done with this hardware and Adobe software to expose the performance differences of these graphic cards. I have a limited time using these cards and will have to make decision what makes sense to keep and what to return.
I notice that today while the AMD Sapphire 7950's price sits at around $455, the Nvidia K5000 ranges from $1599 at OWC, $1799 at NewEgg, and to as much as $2499 at the online Apple Store.
Here's a graph of my results
Latest CUDA driver via System Prefs is installed.
I would have expected to see a difference between having 1x K5000 installed vs. having 2x K5000... but as I post above, there's no observed difference using CUDA or OpenCL. This tells me the 2nd K5000 is either not being seen or is ineffective for encoding the timeline. The System Profiler report clearly shows 2x K5000 discovered.
My decision of buying 2x K5000 vs. 1x K5000 vs. buying 1x Sapphire 7950 needs to be made within my 30 days return policy with OWC. Thus I'm anxious to make the most of this time by testing correctly.
If you or other have some other tests I should perform please post them here... thanks.
I had a chat with Adobe Tech Help concerning this 1x K5000 and 2x K5000 and was told that for encoding a timeline (exporting) the basic requirement for the graphics card is 1GB VRAM and not too much horsepower. This results in only 1 card being used and the 2nd one would be essentially doing nothing.
The time when 2x K5000s get used will be during project work being done and applying effects such as Color Grading and Warp stabilizing. In these cases the 2x K5000 would get heavy use and speed things along.
This then explains why my test showed identical encoding timeline times for 1x K5000 and 2x K5000s.
I will admit, my workflow moves along quite a bit faster using 1x K5000 and even better with 2x K5000s when compared to using the single Sapphire Radeon HD 7950.
I will be using the K5000s for rest of week and will compare this with what I know I can do using the 7950. Then make a decision what to keep and return.
BTW... when calling in for Tech Help the menu system mentioned that telephone help will soon be abandoned and users should use Chat and/or forums for help.... (sigh).
Last edited by bxs; Jun 21, 2014 at 09:36 AM. Reason: Added more info.
[Spurious links removed]

Bill Gehrke wrote:
It is to bad that you could not test an nVidia GTX card, one good GTX 780 would put all those to shame.
Actually, he can. The GTX780 can run at a low enough power draw that 5,1 Mac Pro should be able to power it. And it can be modified by MacVidCards so that it shows the Apple boot screen and works properly at PCI-E v2.0 speeds. I'd recommend to the OP to check the MacRumors forums, and look for the user named "MacVidCards". Or find him on EBay. His side business is modifying PC-based video cards such that they boot and work properly in Mac Pros. You can buy a new GTX780 through NewEgg or AMZN, and have it sent directly to him. He'll take it, modify it appropriately, and mail it directly to you.
All of that said, it won't beat the 6,1. ;-)

X3100&NVS1​40M graphic card,which one can take more quickly in ultiboard Show 3D?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for

X3100&NVS140M graphic card,which one can take more quickly in ultiboard Show 3D?