X48C posting issue

OK tried some different ram (samsung 1600 DDR3) and manage to boot at 1600mhz 9-9-9-24 CR1.  Still had stability issues so I put the OCZ1600 platinum ram back in to play with voltages and timing. 
Testing set-up was to see the lowest DDR3 timing at stock speed 1333 and then increase speed until stability falls over - my reckoning here is that with the quad core the biggest bottleneck is latency and bandwidth so the speed of the CPU is really secondary to the speed of the RAM.
One issue I ran into was occasionally tripping up and putting in the wrong setting - motherboard wouldn't boot then.  Clearing CMOS lets you boot once but then when you save your settings and reboot you get failed boot (same as RamS explained). 
Key to get it going again is to:
* leave turned off (at the PSU power switch) for over a half hour;
* Clear CMOS;
* boot, load optimized defaults;
* save and reboot;
* go into BIOS and start making your settings!
* if you leave the memory switcher/turbo cards out the 'board wont know half the time whether it is in DDR2 or DDR3 mode so leave them in(I used to leave them out but not anymore) 
* DDR3 seemed to work better in the 2nd "paired" slots
Here is my setup:
MSI x48c motherboard running BIOS v7.3B1T
Q9550 quad core @ 1.300v
OCZ DDR3 12800 Platinum edition 1600 ram 2GB x 2 (OCZ3 P16004GK) - in DDR3 slots 2 & 4 (DDR slots 3 & 6) @ 1.92v
Turbo/memory switcher cards in DDR2 slots, RAM linked 1:2 FSB
RAM timing expressed as tCL-tRCD-tRP-tRAS-tRFC-tWR-tWTR-tRRD-tRTP-tRD-CR
Windows XP Pro 64-bit
1333
Timing 7-6-6-16-48-8-4-3-4-6-CR2 @ 1333 (2.83GHz CPU), 1.83v
Memtest stable, burntest (10/10) stable
1440
Timing 7-6-6-18-60-10-5-4-5-6-CR2 @ 1440 (3.06GHz CPU), 1.92v
Memtest stable, burntest (10/10) stable, Primed 10 hours
Everest reports read/write/copy of 8457/7637/7960MBs with latency of 63.6ns.  Sandra reports 7.48GBs on 66.48% bandwidth efficiency
Now, here's where it gets interesting.  I could push 7-6-6-16-60-10-5-4-5-6-CR2 all the way to 1600 @ 1.92v using FSB (VTT) voltage of 1.27v, DDR CHA & CHB reference voltage 0.95v, MCH DDR reference voltage 0.96v.  With FSB @ 1560, Everest yielded read/write/copy values of 9170/8276/8677MBs with latency of 58.6ns (Sandra says 8.08GBs on 66.10% bandwidth efficiency).  After 2:30hrs Memtest (5 passes) I had one error in test 4 (on 2nd pass).  Memtest would consistently give up 1 or 2 errors over a long run and always at same memory address.  Attempts to Burntest either locked up or failed the run though. BUT PC was stable enough to do video encoding.  Perhaps some tweaking of GTL voltages are required - I can run the CPU all the way up to 1800FSB (3.83GHz) but what's the point if the cores have to sit around waiting for the RAM? (1:1.6).  I get the same memory bandwidth @ 1600FSB (3.4GHz) as 1720FSB (3.67GHz) - coz the RAM is only running at 1376!  As another example, Sandra reports 7.85GB/s @ 7-7-7-24 on 1600FSB (required timing for stability @ 1600FSB) but I get the same bandwidth @ 7-6-6-16 on 1500FSB  Less heat and stress at the lower speed, lasts longer, more stable, just as fast: why go faster with higher latency?  My video encoder is quad core enabled but I never see more than 90% CPU usage and there are frequent swings as it is moving data between RAM, CPU and hard drive.  I've actually noticed more CPU swings and less CPU usage as memory bandwidth goes down (even with CPU speed going faster) due to less bandwidth being available and the higher latency.
I've never had a board quite like this before.  It is a true hobbyist 'board and by that I mean you need a lot of spare time to tune and tweak.  Seems the key to getting your stable performance is using the reference and GTL voltages.  The quad cores have more than enough processing power at standard speeds - key to system performance is RAM speed and latency.  RAM runs quite hot @ 1.92v and reference voltages as stated above so perhaps with better cooling maybe could sustain 1600 FSB with no errors.
hope this info is of use to somebody.  When I first started out I found a lot of people on the net with same set-up as me but no solutions to the boot up and speed problems.

uber chopper, open your own thread instead of hijacking. In fact, I'm splitting it off the other user's topic and creating one for you.
The RAM you are using is DDR3 1066 RAM with permission, "certified," to run at 1333 or 1600 by OCZ.  True DDR3 1333 RAM runs at 1.5V, not 1.83.

Similar Messages

  • Under which group i have to post issues related to SAP - Basis

    Hello All,
    Can some one tell me
    Under which group i have to post issues related to SAP - Basis
    Thanks
    Balaji

    Hi,
    As such there is forum which is dedicated to basis. But there are number of forum where you can post issues depending upon what type of issue you have e.g.
    If you have issue related to database then you can post in SAP on Oracle, SAP on DB6, SAP on MaxDB etc.
    If it is related to OS then SAP on Unix, SAP on window etc.
    If it is related to ERP/EHP upgrade then SAP ERP 6.0 upgrade, Enhancement Package installation.
    If its related to netweaver then on SAP Netweaver administrator, SAP netweaver platform.
    Thanks
    Sunny

  • Re posting issue

    Hi experts,
    I have a problem regarding re posting issue where during simulation of debit position for month July 2008, a message box 'No Entry Found Matching Selection' appears. Why is the message keep on appearing when I havent post debit position for July 2008 and the LO is still active until 31 December 2008. Both the LO and rental unit are active.
    Anyone can help?

    Are there components in the Production Order? If yes, is the reservation created and movement allowed for the reservation?
    Lakshman

  • Intercompany posting issue: "enter at least one item in leading company cod

    hi can any one resolve this
    intercompany posting issue: "enter at least one item in leading company code XXX"
    i am tring to post the intercompany trasaction iu am geting the above message...........

    Hi,
    Can you provide me OBYA settings between these two entities and posting parameters you used to get this error message ?  This will help me to understand the problem better.
    Best Regards,
    Madhu

  • Where do we post issues about bad apple customer support

    where do we post issues about bad apple customer support?

    Well, these are user-to-user forums. I'm not sure that posting complaints about Apple customer support here would be a) productive (what can we really do?) and b) acceptable under the terms of use, though I'm not sure. My inclination would be to write a letter directly to Apple. Even in this email age, "real" letters seem to command more attention.
    Best of luck.

  • POST issue

    Hello i have the x48c platinum mobo. What I am facing is a boot problem. The problem is as follows : powering up my computer after it having been shut down for some hours or more, i don't get the POST message. The system starts, the fans start but i only get a black screen. If I wait for like 10-15 seconds and do a restart then the system boots up just fine. If i restart for example at 5 seconds then the same situation appears. Another clue : If I turn my pc off at windows then power it on just after it shuts down, everything is just fine, wait for 1 hour and i have the same problem. What i've been told is that it may be a DDR3 issue. As you can see I am kinda newbie at this stuff so excuse any stupid stuff i've written above. Thanks in advance for your help.

    Please provide full system specs to give us a better picture of your configuration.  Read the >>Posting Guide<< to get an idea about the details you should include.

  • POS-DM, BIW & R/3 posting issue after BIW patch updation

    Landscape details:
    SAP IS-Retail (ECC 6.0), SAP POS (Triversity GM 9.5.10), PI 7.0, BIW/POS-DM 7.0
    Issue Detail
    We have upgraded the patch level of Support package BI_CONT in BIW from 5 to 11 in production server and after that following issues have started:
    1.     The duplicate posting started in R/3 i.e. if some POS EoD (TLog) file is already posted from POS-DM to R/3 and if the same file comes to POS-DM again then it gets posted in R/3 again. It was not happening before updating the patch, it used to get stop in POS-DM only.
    2.     We have some EANs which starts with ZERO, those POS transaction doesnu2019t get posted in BIW Cubes and R/3 wherein the ZERO prefix articles exists. It stuck in POS-DM with the error u201CUnknown EAN/UPC numberu201D. But this error comes only if we enable the u201CMstr Data Filteru201D check from General Setting in /N/POSDW/IMG. If we disable this check then the data gets posted in R/3 but it doesnu2019t go in RSA7 & BIW Cubes.
    3.     Before updating the patch the u201CMstr Data Filteru201D check was disabled and our posting was happening perfectly in R/3 as well BIW. What we understand is that, this check is required to pick the Article Code from masters with reference of EAN number which comes in POS TLog file and then it gets posted. We had written a ROUTINE in update rules to pick the Article Code from masters after truncating ZERO prefix from EAN, because the masters which we upload in R/3 with ZERO prefix EAN are getting updated in BIW without ZERO prefix.
    4.    In the T-Code /N/POSDW/MON0, we  are not able to change the status of processed transaction from 4 (completed)  to 1 (ready) or vice-a-versa. Earlier we were able to do the same. This is required to re-process the transactions after doing the corrections in errors occurred at the time of first  processing. 
    Regards
    Amar Preet Singh

    Hi
    1)Duplicate posting in R/3 :  check the 'Tasks' configuration WPUUMS & WPUTAB in /N/POSDW/IMG  in POSDM.
    2) Write a Routine in BI side to allow EAN's with prefix Zeros
    3) master data filter is used to check the data with BI master data. Master data filter should always be used while data posting.
    4) The status should be first changed from completed to cancelled/rejected and then cancelled to Ready status.
        Then you will be able to reprocess the posdm data to ISR.
    Regards
    Abhijit

  • GR-IR clearing Posting issue

    Hi,
    The scenario step is
    1. PO creation
    2. Service entry creation and acceptance
    3. Invoice verification
    The issue is, after the invoice is posted, when i look at the accounting doc, the posting should be from GRIR to Vendor. but instead the accounting doc contains GR/IR as well as the GL postingv(the GL which is maintained in PO).
    Why the posting is happening against GL account of PO? (Note : GR/IR clearing flag is checked in Invoice).
    Can someone help pls?
    Regards,
    Maniraj

    Thanks everyone for your responses. It has been a great help. I found one more peculiar behaviour,
    I post a partial invoice, PO value - 500
    Now, WBS avail budget - 1000, commitment is 500 Actual - 0
    GR Value  - 250,
    WBS avail budget - 1000 commitment becomes 250, Actuals 250
    IR value - 150 (partial invoice) with GRIR cleared
    WBS avail budget - 1100, Commitment 250, Actuals 150 I understand it is STD.
    Now i post a subsequent invoice, for 100 for the same PO with GRIR indicator unchecked in MIRO
    but WBS avail budget - 1100, Commitment 250, Actuals 150.
    There is no change in WBS actuals or avail budget
    Instead when i post a subsequent invoice, for 100 for the same PO with GRIR indicator checked in MIRO
    WBS avail budget - 1000, Commitment 250, Actuals 250
    There is change in WBS actuals and budget gets reduced accordingly.
    Sorry for making it long, just want to explain the scenario clearly..
    Can someone please explain why there is no change in WBS actuals in previous case?
    Thanks

  • Posting issue

    hi
    we are facing a problem in posting payroll results to FI.  We have defined employees as vendors.
    The posting of bank transfer happens via vendor accounts.
    Due to some configuration changes , (not sure what changes were) , while posting payroll results in case of employees who have a retro run , system is bringing the past month /559 in the current  month posting and having a debit and credit effect for the same . This is happening for all employees.
    Now we checked the congiuration and found that the matchcode P was  maintained for the Posting AA type FC. Later we trited to remove and re run , but still same issue.
    Due to this there are a huge number of line items that get generated while the posting is run and it takes time.
    We want to know why the system is bringing /559 of the past payoll period in this fashion?
    Regards
    sameer

    hi
    did you add /551 /552 /553 wage types to integration tables , as /559.
    those wage types should be add like this ,
    /551   -
    /552  +
    /553  +
    so after retro you should not face any probs .

  • Goods Receipt posting issue

    Hi Guru,
      I know it's an old question to rise but I forgot how to do it. Please help.
    When doing goods receipt shows--posting only possible in periods 2006/12 and 2006/11 in company code 3000.
    Thanks,Cindy

    As I already inform you the solution, you can take use of either solution.
    From your posting period issue, it is quiet evident that you are not working on a production client and .
    Anyways, if you are on production client, then take assistance of MM & FI consultant in your team.
    Solution 1:
    Post your material with posting date in between 12/2006 & 11/2006.
    Solution 2:
    Using Tcode MMPV - Close Period for Material Master,
    Provide your current date.
    Radio Button - Close Period only.
    Reason for selecting this radio button - Setting this indicator reduces the run-time of the period closing program by approximately 50%.
    So logically speaking you have to carryout this for each & every month from 2006 to till date.
    If you are doing it on your testing purpose, kindly follow following solution for your cause.
    Solution 3:
    Step 1. Use tcode OX18 - select the plants assigned to Company code - delete - save
    Step 2. Use tcode OMSY - Enter current financial month & save.(06-2010)
    Step 3. Use tcode OX18 - assign all plants to co code
    Step 4. Use tcode OMWD - enter valuation area 0001.
    Hope it can assist you.
    Thanks & Regards
    JP

  • Employee Vendor and Third Party Vendor Posting Issue

    Dear Experts,
    I have an issue while Posting of Employee Vendor and Third Party Vendor.
    In T706K table, maintained symbolic account offset entry MJ90 Wage Type but its asking for Symbolic Exp account too. Otherwise, while posting its says Trip has no postable entries.
    I should get entry in FB03 as mentioned below
    Employee Vendor   (Dr)
    Service Tax            (Dr)
    Third Party Vendor  (Cr)
    Awaiting for quick response.
    Regards
    Shaik

    Hi Sieg,
    Thanks for your reply.
    Company has given Forex advance to employee via third party vendor
    So, We need to debit the amount into Employee Vendor and Credit into Third Party Vendor
    For Ex: Third Party Vendor is Thomas Cook (Forex Provider)
    Please guide me how to post the above entry in Standard.
    Regards
    Shaik

  • Document posting issue in CORK

    Hi Everyone,
    We post the confirmation for the process order through CORK transaction.
    My control key has been configured for Auto GR and material to be issued are properly maintained for Backflushing.
    Now I go into CORK, into goods movement screen edit material component data and save the confirmation. I get the message that Order is Confirmed. But When I display the order cofirmation through CORT, system only shows the confirmation, no goods movements are posted.
    I cancel the confirmation through CORS.
    This time I confirm the transaction through COR6N, edit the material components in Goods Movement screen and Save. This time order is confirmed and goods movements are also posted.
    Our users are trained to confirm process order through CORK. This issue started from yesterday. Before that CORK was working fine and goods were getting posted without any issues.
    Please guide me if I am doing anything wrong anywhere.
    Thanks,
    Parashar.

    1. Using CORS when you are saving : please have a look at bottom left corner of the window to see if there is any message displayed (mostly it will be there - if yes click it find the error message - and post it here or with error message you can yourself do further investigation).

  • Invoice posting issue

    hi
    I have created one PO and two different (two times) GRN done for same po however at the time tof inoice posting (MIRO) with refeence to first  DC, system has display full qty of grn (sum of two different dc qty).
    can you help the same issue.
    reg
    mrs

    hI,
    You would have posted the grn for the PO with the GR Based invoicxe verification check in the PO.If the PO is checked with the box GR based invoice verification in the invoice tab, then system will show you the partial GRs happed with DC in the MIRO screen when referenced.
    Refgards,

  • MIRO posting issue

    Hi gurus,
    I have an issue with MIRO Posting..after when I entered the data and saved..It shows that Document Number is ben created..
    But when I tried to see the results in MIR4 it shows that document Number  doesn't exist..
    Even in table BSEG..It shows that the corresponding Document Number doesn't exist..
    Could you please suggest..
    Thanks
    Natasha SS..

    Look at OSS [Search for SAP Notes and SAP Knowledge Base Articles    |http://service.sap.com/notes] restricting on your system (if maintained in [System Data Maintenance|http://service.sap.com/system-data]) and look for keyword J_1B_NF_DOCUMENT_INSERT.
    There are some notes like [Note 948609 - J_1B_NF_DOCUMENT_INSERT: terminate with error 8B 105|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/948609] but you must filter with your exact system level.
    Ask your your SAP System Administrator to give you access to OSS, or to perform the search. If no OSS notes solve your problem, raise a message via [Report a Product Error - Customer Messages|http://service.sap.com/message]
    Regards,
    Raymond

  • IDOC posting issue

    Hi,
    Scenario:
    We are creating cost centre Inter company STO with account assignment K .Single Line item quantities are being split into two deliveries and later combined inter company invoice is created for both deliveries.
    From invoice output through EDI ,automatic posting is generated to vendor account.IDOC is created.
    Issue is -IDOC is not getting posted .Status is with error message:
    System error: Error in routine MENGE_WRBTR_DISTRIBUTE(SAPLMRMK)
    Message no. M8607
    Procedure
    Contact your system administrator.
    We checked configuration for Account assignment K in OME9 which seemed OK.Default values set in OME9 (TWRKZ) are not getting flown /triggered at ( EKPO -TWRKZ) This happens only in Cost centre Inter company STOs when line is split
    How to resolve this issue ?Any body faced this kind of error ?
    Your suggestions are highly appreciable
    Best regards,
    SAPUKSD

    Hi,
    Thanks for the response.
    I have searched few Notes
    Note 816772 - EDI: Entering invoices before goods receipt..and 1327713, 501905 But all are for different scenarios
    Can somebody suggest on this please?
    Best Regards,
    sapuksd

Maybe you are looking for

  • Applet servlet communication under mac os x

    Hi everbody, I have an applet that invokes a servlet via url connection and maintain session status using cookies. Everything works fine under linux and windows but I have problems under mac ox 10.2 (with jdk1.4.1): I reported an EOFException reading

  • Why is Aperture 3 sooooo slow?

    Let me first say I just started using Aperture 3 after using Photoshop/Lightroom for years and so far over all I LOVE it. However I'm finding it to be extremely slow at processing images. I made a default preset in adjustments that I would like to us

  • File Manager (alpha) Removed?

    File Manager (alpha) along with Partner tab has been removed from my Admin Page recently.  I have webCommerce package...anybody have any idea why this is happening?  File Manager within Site Manager does not let me move or rename files...help!

  • JMX NotificationListener is never called (Weblogic 10.3)

    Hi folks I'm trying to register a NotificationListener which gets called when the 'HeapSizeCurrent' attribute of the JVMRuntimeMBean has changed. I tried the following code, but the listener is never called. Any ideas? public class Test implements No

  • Want To Report On (Video) Queue Avg. Util/Max Util with Prime Infr 2.0

    We just got Prime Infrastructure 2.0 in, and I've just been given a very aggressive time-line to implement Telepresence. We have an MPLS network with differential services configured. Particularly on the WAN routers, we have modular QoS with LLQ. I'd