XCelsius 2008 is not backward compatible with ver 4.5

Post Author: Joseph
CA Forum: Xcelsius and Live Office
I tried opening a project that was done with ver 4.5 but it just said that "Crystal Xcelsius is unable to load this file. This file may be corrupt or may have features that cannot be supported by this version of Crystal Xcelsius." So i guess I probably have to recreate the project in the 2008 version to take advantage of the new features available. So I imported the excel datasheet used in the old project to a new project in Xcelsius 2008 and tried recreating the objects from scratch. I had started with an accordion menu and two list boxes and then I decided to export to swf to test. However, the result was disappointing. I could only see the two list boxes but not the accordion menu. There was a message saying "Initializing..." that stayed. Does this mean I have to recreate the excel data from scratch as well?

Post Author: abrat
CA Forum: Xcelsius and Live Office
X2008 is backward compatible with CX4.5. But Jim is correct. There is a bug in X2008 which prevents it from opening some 4.5 models by double-clicking on the filename. They can be opened from the File > Open menu. This only affects opening the model.Due to the many changes between CX4.5 and X2008, the migration of old CX4.5 models is not clean. Differences will be seen. Most are cosmetic affecting only the look of the model. But some tidy up, color changes and re-alignment work must be done. There was no way to gain the benefits of X2008 and still keep CX4.5 models unchanged.Andy

Similar Messages

The Bluetooth low energy protocol is not backward compatible with classic Bluetooth protocol. My iPhone 4s can not find my sonny in-dash player. However my iPhone 3GS does it. Very disappointed with this. Any idea how it can be fixed???

The Bluetooth low energy protocol is not backward compatible with classic Bluetooth protocol.
My iPhone 4s can not find my sonny in-dash player. However my iPhone 3GS does it. Very disappointed with this.
Any idea how it can be fixed??????

Hello,
You are correct, Blue tooth low engergy, BTLE.(only) devices are not backward compatible with Classic bluetooth and cannot connect.
However the Apple 4S and above have Bluetooth 4.0 support.. Hardware wise it has bothClassic Bluetooth, like the 3GS, as well as Bluetooth Low Energy. There is no good reason why your 4s cannot communicate to your Sony in-dash player using the Classic bluetooth that resides in the 4S.
I know that this does not answer the why it does not work, but it should work. Do you have to somehow re-pair the new phone up to the player? Not knowing the model of the Sony it is hard to investigate.
And I hate to ask but are you sure that the Bluetooth radio is on in the phone?
JT

CC Apps NOT Backward compatible with Master Collection 6.0...WHY NOT?!!!!

This is just horse doodoo. Adobe, you've already got us hooked and paying out the nose, so WHY do I have to save all of my files in an OLDER version (InDesign, for instance) when I'm working on them in Creative Cloud just so I can be able to open them with my MasterCollection6 I paid $3000+ for?
I should NEVER see the message: "Cannot save because file was created with a newer version Creative Cloud..." when I am working with your latest NON-MONTHLY CS6 Master Collection Apps. It is a pain in the a$$ and slows down our workflow.
PLEASE, either give your loyal Master Collection 6 customers updates that make our Apps compatible with Creative Cloud, or start making Creative Cloud Apps backward compatible with our 6.xx version!
Stop trying to hold us hostage with your plans to monthly-revenue everything we already paid thousands for, please!
Sincerely pisT,
Small Business Owner

New features in new software does sometimes mean that new files do not open in old software
Microsoft also does this... the new DOCX documents will not open in the old Word 97 (and, in fact, I had to buy MS Office 2003 because MS Office 97 would not even install and run on Windows 7)

Why am I forced to update my OS because the Cloud desktop is not backward compatible with OS X 10.6.8? [was: Why do you do this...]

Why do you do this... My mac is old pro running Version 10.6.8 and now I cant up load the creative cloud desk top app without updating the OS. Why cant these apps be backward compatible? I am perfectly happy with V 10.6.8 and my old pro..

There is no requirement to move on from your old pro. I still use mine.

XML C v2 is not backward compatible with 8.1.5 o NT

I have Oracle8i (8.1.5) installed on Windows NT. And the XML C parser v2 I got contain oracore8.dll & oranls8.dll (8.1.6). Somehow these two DLLs does not work with my 8.1.5 environment since I was not able to connect to DB once I used these DLLs.
I need the Oracle environment because I need to process other code apges other that US-ASCII.

We plan to have the XML Parser in a separate dll in the future so it can be dropped in to an existing Oracle Home.
Oracle XML Team

Edge Animate 2014.1 not backwards compatible to 2014.0 documents

This is a request to Adobe:
Minor version revisions should not cause project incompatibilities in .an project files!
The update to 2014.1 Edge Animate (October 2014) causes trouble in lab settings. My students using 2014.1 on their personal machines cannot open their work on 2014.0. All of our lab computers have 2014.0 installed. I can understand major revision incompatibilities, but minor revisions should be bug fixes and simple updates and should not affect projects created *yesterday*.
This is endlessly frustrating, because we have to call upon our staff tech support any time a minor bug fix is put into place with CC.
In terms of addressing this issue, how might someone go about updating a .an project file to be backwards-compatible? In Edge Animate, no option exists to save backwards.
Thanks for any help on this issue.

Composition created withe Edge 2014.1 is not backward compatible with Edge 2014.0. More info
Changing the minimumCompatibleVersion will have undesirable side effects.
For sharing with others you can create the composition in 2014.0 itself.
FYI: You can install both Edge 2014.0 and Edge 2014.1 side by side on the same machine.

Is The iPod Touch Backward Compatible With USB 1.1 Connections?

Hi. I intend to get the iPod Touch soon. But, before I make the leap, I'd like to know whether the iPod Touch is backward compatible with my older USB 1.1 connections. Any help will be appreciated here. Thank you.

Hello Castlegard,
As mentioned, the Minimum System Requirements for the iPod Touch does specify USB 2.0, see the requirements here:
http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1323
While it is theoretically possible to sync over a USB 1.1 connection, your mileage may vary. Consider that USB 1.1 has a transfer rate of 12Mbit/sec, where USB 2.0 is 480Mbit/sec, so USB 2.0 is basically 40x faster. Transferring small files may succeed, but when you try to get iTunes to update or restore an iPod Touch, it will be trying to push a 300MB file (approximately) through a 12Mbit pipe. Trying to do updates or restore via USB 1.1 will often result in iTunes timing out before the process is complete.
If I were to try to sync a 1.5GB movie over a USB 1.1 connection, I could probably go to downtown Sydney and have a nice dinner and attend a concert at the Sydney Opera House and still get back before the sync was complete. BTW, I live in California...
If your computer is a desktop tower, upgrading to USB 2.0 is a relatively inexpensive proposition. If you are not a handy person with a phillips screwdriver or electical devices, most computer dealers or resellers will install for a nominal fee.
Charles H.

Would like to upgrade to Dragon Naturally Speaking 11 from DNS 6 (which would also entail a necessary upgrade from Windows 2000 to 7) but understand after all this expense and trouble, DNS upgrade may not be compatible with Firefox 6?

Question
Would like to upgrade to Dragon Naturally Speaking 11 from DNS 6 (which would also entail a necessary upgrade from Windows 2000 to 7) but understand after all this expense and trouble, DNS upgrade may not be compatible with Firefox 6?
Main priority is voice activation upgrade. Ideas about how to proceed appreciated!

AFAIK, it's been over three years since a WinXP laptop or desktop PC has been sold; I specifically bought a laptop in June 2008 because it was being clearanced by that retail chain to meet Microsoft's deadline, and got it real cheap. It was tagged for the store manager to purchase, but he let me have it because I exceeded his expectations for the services I performed for his store and thought I deserved it. Anything that wasn't made for Vista-compatibility will be very iffy with Win7, IMO - so that basically rules out anything that was made before like Oct or Nov 2007.
Unless another DNS 11 user happens to see this thread and can verify whether it works in Firefox 6.0 or not, I don't what to recommend except for you doing a web search to see what other DNS / Firefox users have to say about compatibility.

Vector shapes not backwards compatible?

Hello,
I work in an office where some people are on differnt versions of Photoshop while I am using CC. When I create vector objects and save them in a file they sometimes show up as all black in older versions of photoshop. Is there a process that I can use that will get around this issue? These files are passed back and forth and I understand that I may loose the ability to use some of the newer features with CC in order to avoid issues. But I need to use the vector options on a daily basis.
I see another issue that people are running into that I also deal with alot and that is the crop tool adjustments. When you use the crop tool it sometimes makes the vectors all out of wack.
Any help is apreciated!
Thank you,
Andrew H

You have your compatibilities backwards. Older versions are not forward compatible for newer features are not in older versions of Photoshop so compatibility is not possible. Newer versions of Photoshop for the most part are backwards compatible with older versions of Photoshop. However Adobe drops the ball at times. Since CS4 Photoshop is not fully backwards compatible in fact Photoshop CS4 and newer are not fully compatible with themselves. There are bugs and compatibility issues with options in the adjustment panels fly-out menu. Option in it can change Photoshop default operation which not only makes it not backwards compatible they make some feature in the current version work in an inconsistent manner. The code implementing these options are not without their bug. Photoshop does not always operate the way the options are set.

When will USB 3.0 be truly backwards compatible with USB 2.0 audio interfaces?

hello
I own a U46DJ mkII audio interface. I use the interface for music production, particularly recording vocals.
The device performs well on my windows laptop, I can record clean vocals with no artifacts. On the macbook pro however, the incoming audio signal is full of digital pops and clicks.
After spending a few days searching for solutions on google I narrowed it down to the USB 3.0 ports on the new macbook pro.
Lots of people with with all different brands of audio interface are experiencing problems while connecting them to USB 3.0 ports.
Here is an article on the topic: http://createdigitalmusic.com/2012/06/usb-3-0-backwards-compatible-in-theory-but -some-audio-drivers-arent-cooperating/
So, when will USB 3 be truly backwards compatible with our USB 2 devices?

Tuesday. That's what I heard.
Perhaps the driver is the problem. Check with the interface manufacturer.
I have a Focusrite USB interface that sounds great but Pro Tools and Logic kept crashing when I used it. I went back and forth with Focusrite, they had several beta drivers which they sent me, none of which fixed the problem. Turns out the interface works better without the driver from the manufacturer.
I find it hard to blame Apple for this. It's not like they didn't have the ML beta out for a long time for all the device manufacturers to test their drivers and their hardware with. Apple can't keep tabs on every third party developer on the planet and design their software and hardware to keep all of them happy.
If you want to give Apple some feedback you can do it here: Apple - Mac OS X - Feedback

Are 3g chargers backwards compatible with first gen iphone?

so i know that older chargers don't seem to work on the 3g iphones, but are the newer chargers backwards compatible with the 2g iphones?
i was thinking of getting some after market wall & car chargers for my first gen iphone, but i rather buy ones made for the 3g iphones just incase i upgrade soon (and i don't want to repurchase the chargers)
anyone know?

well I'm aware that certain first gen chargers won't work with the 3G, but i've come across this 3g car charger which specifically states it's not compatible with a first gen iphone. strange.
http://www.monoprice.com/products/product.asp?cid=108&cp_id=10831&cs_id=1083105&pid=4871&seq=1&format=2
unfortunately it doesn't say if it's the same case with their 3g wall charger.

How do I go back to Firefox 5.0? I need to use Selenium IDE, which is not yet compatible with 6.0.

How do I go back to Firefox 5.0? I need to use Selenium IDE, which is not yet compatible with 6.0.

The link is to the latest update to 4.o which was 4.0.1
The 4.0.1 and 5.0 are two separate versions as installing 4.0.1 over 5.0 will just give you the old 4.0.1 as the end result.
The 5.0 is partially as a security update in place of 4.0.2.
The Skype extension was only for to make it so you can dial phone numbers on a web page in the separate Skype program right so if you were not using it then no need for the Skype extension for the separate Skype application to work.

Oracle 11g jars not being compatible with WAS 6.1.x versions

Hi,
We have an issue with Oracle 11g jars not being compatible with WAS 6.1.x versions.
If we use Oracle10g client jars then they are working with the 11g database.
Below are the findings
Working fine With Ojdbc14.jar
Not working With Ojdbc5.jar
WAS 6.0
Working fine With Ojdbc14.jar
Not working With Ojdbc5.jar
WAS 6.013
Working fine With Ojdbc14.jar
Not working With Ojdbc5.jar
As per IBM website link Oracle 11g should be working with WAS 6.1.0.21 upwards
Could somebody please help me regarding the same.
thanks & Regards,
Anoop

# Download the full Firefox installer from http://www.mozilla.com/
# Delete the Firefox [http://kb.mozillazine.org/Installation_directory installation directory], making sure all the Firefox files and folders are removed. The default location on 32 bit Windows is C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox\
# Re-install Firefox
Note that deleting the Firefox installation directory will not remove your bookmarks or other Firefox user data, they are stored elsewhere.

Captivate 2 backwards compatible with 1?

Is Captivate 2 backwards compatible with Captivate 1?
For example, would it be just the new features that would be
disabled if I opened a Captivate 2 file in Captivate 1 such as
scenarios, or would the whole file be unopenable.
Also, how does the import work if I'm bringing a file in from
Captivate 1? Do I just open it or would I need to rework anything?
Also in Captivate 1, I've had to hand-write special htm files
for the Active X problem. Are these sorted out in Captivate 2?
I'm ready to release some training and I'm wondering if I
should upgrade it before it goes out, e.g. to add some scenarios.
But if it requires too much rework, I don't have the time right
now.
Thanks,
Kim

Hi Kim
For discussion about backwards compatibility,
Click
here
Yes, I do believe they have addressed the special coding
required to handle the "click to activate this control" message we
now see. So you shouldn't need to do anything special with respect
to this issue.
Cheers... Rick

Is a PCI-488.2-1M card backwards compatible with the 488-1975 standard?

Is a PCI-488.2-1M card backwards compatible with the 488-1975 standard?

IEEE 488-1975 is one of the early revisions of the IEEE 488.1 stardard, other revisions include 488-1978 and 488.1-1987.
Because the original IEEE 488 document contained no guidelines for preferred syntax and format conventions, work continued on the specification to enhance system compatibility and configurability among test systems. This work resulted in a supplement standard, IEEE 488.2.
So, both 488.1 and 488.2 support 488-1975
I checked the link and it is fine, make sure you have the right web browser settings.
http://sine.ni.com/apps/we/nioc.vp?cid=1233〈=US

XCelsius 2008 is not backward compatible with ver 4.5

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for