XI & Biztalk - advantage & disadvantage

What are the  advantage & disadvantage of XI & Biztalk ?
Which one is best solution as a middleware ?
Please provide in relavance to adapters IDOC etc..

Sap XI
       XI is well suited for connecting SAP systems with each other and with non-SAP. SAP XI provides an integrated workflow engine that allows defining adapters to non-XML protocols and mappings to convert data content from source to target format.
XI comes handy particularly incase of SAP - Non SAP interfaces where you can import standard integration content. Also XI has got sophisticated open standard adapter framework which is very easy to implement and custom logic can be implemented using Adapter module programming.
Advantages
Monitoring is better than any other middleware product. It offers exhaustive monitoring features like message, performance, component monitoring etc, all of which can be used to track and rectify the errors. It follows a hub and spoke model.
When you need to integrate with an SAP system XI has an advantage in supporting various SAP components and so on.
Process functionalities inside XI to modify content in the communication channel on own defined rules for business purposes.
Mappings and adapters are good as comparable with any other middleware product.
Synchronous & Asynchronous communication is possible.
  Dis-Advantages
Web methods are particularly good if u have B2B kind of communication with their Trading Partners product.
XI is lacking full-fledged Message Queue compared to other established Middleware products.
It lacks in ability to process huge messages but SAP is working on that.
It does not have a messaging layer exposed by APIs like IBM MQ-Series.
It is not comparable to Tibco in terms of speed.
SAP relies on other vendors except for a few adapters.
3. BizTalk
            BizTalk is a business process management (BPM) server that enables companies to automate and optimize business processes. This includes powerful, familiar tools to design, develop, deploy, and manage those processes.
            While planning for the integration scenario BizTalk takes care about tasks like Gathering information, Defining naming conventions, planning team development, setting up and working with source control.
Advantages
BizTalk 2004 is completely built on .Net.
Recoverable Interchange. In BizTalk, an Interchange can contain two or more messages, such as a batch. With the introduction of Recoverable Interchange in BizTalk Server 2006, only messages that fail validation are suspended, and the messages can be resumed after the error is corrected.
Failed message routing. New functionality is available to allow orchestration and send ports to subscribe to failed messages. When used appropriately, failed message routing can be used for notifying users of failed messages or building rich error handling and message repair capabilities.
Lowest total cost of ownership (TCO). BizTalk Server reduces the cost and complexity of automating and managing business processes with a single, unified solution for Enterprise Application Integration (EAI), Business-to-Business integration (B2Bi), and Business Process Management (BPM).
Enhanced productivity through integrated management and development tools.
Supports Computer Telephony Interface (CTI) through TAPI.
Dis-Advantages
Recovery is manual.
Backups are not automated.
Fault Tolerance capabilities are supported through other Microsoft products.
Repository only works with MS SQL.
Requires additional software to use certain features in BizTalk 2002, Microsoft Operations Manager & Application Center.
To use a server with 8-32 processors it requires Microsoft Windows 2000 Datacenter, which must be purchased through an OEM.
Only runs on Microsoft/Intel platform and only supports XML Data Reduced (XDR) not XML Schema Definition (XSD).
Edited by: chandra kanth. k on Jun 10, 2008 8:14 AM

Similar Messages

  • What are some of the advantages/disadvantage of using FC or FCoE with a storage array (EMC)? What is Cisco's recommendation and why?

                       What are some of the advantages/disadvantages of using FC or FCoE for a storage array? What does Cisco recommend?

    This is what I'm considering:
    Power:
    1050W Seasonic 80PLUS Gold Power Supply
    Motherboard:
    ASUS, Rampage IV Extreme, 2011, SATA6, True Quad SLI/XFIRE, Extreme OC Capable
    CPU:
    Intel Core i7-4960X 3.60GHz, 2133MHz DDR3, 15MB Cache, Hex Core Processor
    System Memory:
    16GB (4 x 4GB) , PC3-19200, 2400MHz (G.Skill - x79)
    Video Adapter 1:
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780ti 3GB GDDR5
    Video Adapter 2:
    None
    Optical 1
    16X Blu-ray Burner - 16xBD-R, 2xBD-RW/16xDVD-R, 8xDVD-RW/48xCD-R, 24xCD-RW
    Bay Accessories 1
    NZXT Aperture M Multi-media Hub
    RAID [Requires Identical Hard Drive Selections]
    RAID 0 | 2 Disk Min. Striped set, improved performance, additional storage drive highly recommended
    Hard Drive 1
    Crucial M550 1TB 2.5" SATA III 6GB/sec Solid State Drive
    Hard Drive 2
    Crucial M550 1TB 2.5" SATA III 6GB/sec Solid State Drive
    Hard Drive 3
    Crucial M550 1TB 2.5" SATA III 6GB/sec Solid State Drive
    Sound Card
    Creative Labs Sound Blaster Z PCI Express

  • Differences & advantages/disadvantages using OCFS & OMF

    Differences & advantages/disadvantages using “OCFS & OMF” against “ServiceGuard & Veritas CFS” in a RAC implementation

    >
    Differences & advantages/disadvantages using “OCFS & OMF” against “ServiceGuard & Veritas CFS” in a RAC implementationYou need to read a book on RAC for this kind of question - Julian Dyke would
    be my recommendation.
    Paul...
    When asking database related questions, please give other posters
    some clues, like OS (with version), version of Oracle being used and DDL.
    Other trivia such as CPU, RAM + Disk configuration might also be useful.
    The exact text and/or number of error messages is useful (!= "it didn't work!"). Thanks.
    Furthermore, as a courtesy to those who spend time analysing and attempting to help,
    please do not top post and do try to trim your replies!

  • Please let me know the advantage & disadvantage of Cell definition

    Hi ALL,
      can anyone let me know the advantage & disadvantage of Cell definition in bex query.
       Please suggest on this.
    Thanks & Regards
    Sameer Khan

    There are no advantages or disadvantages for cell definitions, it is just the requirement...

  • Advantages/disadvantages,Capabilities,Failures of Types of mapping

    Dear all,
    Can you kindly explain me the Advantages/disadvantages,Capabilities,Failures of Types of mapping.
    what is the parser XSLT uses.
    what is differnece between sax/dom parsers.
    Thanks,
    Srinivasa

    Hi srinivas phani  ,
    The following websites give u good documentation on Mapping:
    Excellent PDF Document on Mapping
    http://help.sap.com/bp_bpmv130/Documentation/Operation/MappingXI30.pdf
    Mapping Development with the ABAP Workbench
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/10/5abb2d9df242f6a62e22e027a6c382/content.htm
    ABAP Mappings
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/ba/e18b1a0fc14f1faf884ae50cece51b/content.htm
    how to create a flat file out of an IDoc-XML by means of an ABAP mapping program and the J2EE File Adapter.
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/46759682-0401-0010-1791-bd1972bc0b8a
    How to Use ABAP Mapping in XI 3.0
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/e3ead790-0201-0010-64bb-9e4d67a466b4
    SAXParser
    Both DOM and SAX approaches have advantages and disadvantages, and your choice of technique must depend on the type of data being parsed, the requirements of your application, and the constraints under which you are operating.
    The SAX approach is linear: It processes XML structures as it finds them, generating events and leaving the event handlers to decide what to do with each structure. The advantage of this approach is that it is resource-friendly; because SAX does not build a tree representation of the document in memory, it can parse XML data in chunks, processing large amounts of data with very little impact on memory. This also translates into better performance; if your document structure is simple, and the event handlers don't have anything too complicated to do, SAX-based applications will generally offer a speed advantage over DOM-based ones.
    The downside, though, is an inability to move around the document in a non- linear manner. SAX does not maintain any internal record of the relationships between the different nodes of an XML document (as the DOM does), making it difficult to create customized node collections or to traverse the document in a non-sequential manner. The only way around this with SAX is to create your own custom object model, and map the document elements into your own custom structures—a process that adds to complexity and can possibly degrade performance.
    Where SAX flounders, though, the DOM shines. The DOM creates a tree representation of the document in memory, making it possible to easily travel from one node to another, or even access the same node repeatedly (again, not something you can do easily in SAX). This tree representation is based on a standard, easy-to-understand model, making it easier to write code to interact with it.
    This flexibility does, however, come with an important caveat. Because the DOM builds a tree in memory, DOM processing cannot begin until the document has been fully parsed (SAX, on the other hand, can begin parsing a document even if it's not all available immediately). This reduces a developer's ability to "manage" the parsing process by feeding data to the parser in chunks, and also implies greater memory consumption and consequent performance degradation.
    Consequently, the choice of technique depends significantly on the type of constraints the application will be performing under, and the type of processing it will be expected to carry out. For systems with limited memory, SAX is a far more efficient approach. On the other hand, complex data-processing requirements can benefit from the standard object model and API of the DOM.
    After using DOM to parse XML documents for any length of time, you will probably begin to notice that performance tends to suffer when you’re dealing with large documents. This problem is endemic to DOM's tree-based structure: larger trees demand more memory, and DOM must load an entire document into memory before it can allow you to parse it. For situations where performance is problematic with DOM, you have an alternative in the Simple API for XML (SAX). In this fifth installment in our Remedial XML series, I'll introduce you to the SAX API, and provide some links to SAX implementations in several different languages.
    Further differences can be seen in the following websites
    http://articles.techrepublic.com.com/5100-22-1044823.html
    Parsing XML Efficiently : DOM Parsing ,SAX Parsing
    http://www.oracle.com/technology/oramag/oracle/03-sep/o53devxml.html
    SAX Example
    http://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=26351&seqNum=6&rl=1
    Event or DOM parsing?
    http://discuss.joelonsoftware.com/default.asp?design.4.156750.12
    SAX samples
    http://xerces.apache.org/xerces2-j/samples-sax.html
    Set up a SAX parser
    http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-tipsaxp.html
    Simple API for XML (SAX)
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simple_API_for_XML
    SAX Parser Benchmarks
    http://piccolo.sourceforge.net/bench.html
    XML Parsers: DOM and SAX Put to the Test
    http://www.devx.com/xml/Article/16922/1954?pf=true
    High-Performance XML Parsing With SAX
    http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2001/02/14/perlsax.html
    Using the SAX Parser
    http://www.javacommerce.com/displaypage.jsp?name=saxparser1.sql&id=18232
    Class SAXParser
    http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/javax/xml/parsers/SAXParser.html
    Class SAXParser
    http://people.apache.org/~andyc/neko/doc/html/javadoc/org/cyberneko/html/parsers/SAXParser.html
    SAX Parsers
    http://webdesign.about.com/od/saxparsers/SAX_Parsers.htm
    Interface SAXParser
    http://excalibur.apache.org/apidocs/org/apache/excalibur/xml/sax/SAXParser.html
    Class SAXParser
    http://xerces.apache.org/xerces2-j/javadocs/xerces2/org/apache/xerces/parsers/SAXParser.html
    DOM Parsing
    Excellent website showing how 2 use Document Object Model (DOM)
    http://www.w3.org/DOM/
    Document Object Model (DOM) Parsing
    http://www.xml.com/lpt/a/1597
    Overview of DOM, DOM Level 3 core,DOM Level 3 Load & Save
    http://www.softwaresummit.com/2004/speakers/GrahamJAXP1.pdf
    Sample java program using DOM
    http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cocoon-cvs/200305.mbox/%[email protected]%3Eorg/mod_mbox/cocoon-cvs/200305.mbox/%[email protected]%3E
    Easy RFC lookup from XSLT mappings using a Java helper class
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/05a3d62e-0a01-0010-14bc-adc8efd4ee14
    XML Transformation Using the TrAX APIs in JAXP
    http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2005/07/06/jaxp.html?page=last
    cheers!
    gyanaraj
    ****Pls reward points if u find this helpful

  • Advantage/disadvantage in OS and Oracle clustering

    Dear DBAs
    i need to know what are the advantages and disadvantages in using Oracle clustering instead of OS clustering.
    I will be thankfull if you can provide a table (advantage/disadvantage) for each case.
    The OS is windows 2003 and the database is 10g
    Thx in advance
    Regards

    One advantage could be you don't need to buy OS clusterware as it comes bundled with Oracle 10g.
    So Cost benifit is One of the advantage.

  • What are the advantages/disadvantages of using PS/CS5 in 64bit over 32bit please?

    What are the advantages/disadvantages of using PS/CS5 in 64bit over 32bit please?

    From a practical perspective, besides the 64 bit version being a bit faster at just about everything, limitations on document size are lifted in the 64 bit version.  Essentially, how much can do is limited only by how much RAM you have installed in your system.  You can do things like have larger documents, deeper history, etc. and have it all work quickly.
    On the other hand, many 3rd party plug-ins, especially older ones, only provide 32 bit versions, which will only run in 32 bit Photoshop.
    Both 32 and 64 bit versions are installed by default.  It's important to note that most of the preferences are separate between the two, so you can have two slightly different setups that might help with specialty operations you might need.  This gets pretty subtle, but for example I keep the 32 bit version configured with only 1 cache level, so all previews of high bit depth images are always composited in high bit depth.  This aids me with some aspects of astroimage processing.  It's slower, but more accurate.  By contrast I have more cache levels configured for my 64 bit version, so that's faster for general photography work.
    -Noel

  • Level Based vs. Value Based hier: advantages, disadvantages and limitations

    Could someone give an overview about the advantages, disadvantages and limitations when comparing OLAP Level to Value based hierarchies?
    Thanks,
    Marcio

    OLAP can handle both types of hierarchies. No performance advantage using one over the other (while loading cube or querying).
    If you are "pushing" dimensional-security inside OLAP, in that case also it does not matter.
    Cube-based MVs (with query-rewrite) can only be created if the hierarchies are level-based. Are you going to need that?
    Generally there are other "non-olap" factors:
    (#1). Which reporting tool will be used. Does it provide better reporting capabilities if the source is parent-child or level-based?
    (#2). Are there any reporting requirements that will need "level" information when selecting data.
    (#3). Are there are any security requirements that will be handled in "reporting-layer" which will need level-based information.
    Although in case of (#1) and (#2), you can "expose" an olap's parent-child hierarchy as "level-based" hierarchy to the reporting tool using internal GID (grouping-id) information.
    OBIEE 11.1.1.5 (and future versions) works well with OLAP metadata, and with any type of hierarchy in olap.
    For other reporting tools, you have to see what features are available.
    In short, its the source system, the reporting tool and the reporting requirements that will dictate what type of hierarchy should be stored in OLAP.

  • What are the Advantages & Disadvantages in Material Ledger?

    Hi Experts,
    What are the Advantages & Disadvantages in Material Ledger?
    Is it there any problem if you run CKMLCP next period 10th day?
    What is the criticality in ML as well as why all are very fearful to implement it?
    Thanks
    Bhagirath

    Hi,
    One cannot speak of 'disadvantage' in this case... If you activate material ledger, you acieve different valuation logic of the prices in the procurement process. Please, consult composite note 532932 for further info. The intimidation of activation is a result of numerous 'bugs' in previous SAP releases regarding the material ledger documents. Most of these 'bugs' are fixed, but the fear remains
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Advantages/Disadvantages of installing Oracle RAC on Windows 2003 VS Linux

    Hello Guys,
    I am not very good with linux, have to create a Oracle RAC environment using dataabse 10g.
    I just need to know the advantages/disadvantages of configuring RAC on windows and on linux operating system.
    Please help me with this. Please also specify what is the best available windows and linux version to configure RAC.
    Regards,
    Imran

    Go with th eOS you have the skills in, if you have onsite expertise in windows then it makes no sense to use Linux because some guy on the internet says its better. Windows can be a highly available server OS when is managed by professional well quallified adminstrators.
    Personally I would use linux because I am more familiar with the OS than windows. I also find oracle makes more sense on a *NIX type platform but there are shops that run oracle on windows with the required high availability.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

  • Advantages & disadvantages with embedded, external use of sub reports

    Hi Guys,
    I have a Question on "re-import subreport when open" option, which is available for sub report and it will reimport the sub report every time when we open the main report.
    With that option we can see every modification until when we open that report.
    My question is, does we have any document which specifies the Advantages & disadvantages of using Embedded, external(re-import) subreports in Main reports.
    And i have one more scenario, i have a subreport which is used in ten reports. In every report i am taking the same Sub report from shared location and check the option "reimport subreport when open". So when i apply any change that change will applied for all ten reports at my next schedule.
    My Question is: if the Subreport executes 10 minutes and i scheduled all the 10 main reports at a time. At that time does the sub report lock for one report or it will use for all the 10 reports? Can anyone give brief explanation about this?
    Regards,
    Naga.

    hi Naga,
    the only advantage to this feature is that changes are reflected when opening your report. that's it....useful for changes when you're in dev mode. disadvantage may be slight loss of speed vs. just embedding the subeport and then manually reimporting.
    the second question should probably be directed to the bi platform and not in cr design as you're scheduling.
    -jamie

  • Advantages/Disadvantages of having 2 Apple ID's with iCloud - Single User

    A separate Apple ID for iCloud and a separate Apple ID for Store Purchases - 1 Mac and 1 iPhone - both to 1 Single User.
    I'm both curious and interested at the same time..
    And would it even be useful? Or should I just stick to using the same Apple ID because in creating another Apple ID, I'd be giving myself more of a hassle when it comes to backing up/restoring?
    I'm still running my mind around this one... (cos it only seems to benefit users who are all iDevice holders living under the same roof etc.. with 1 root Apple ID and multiple iCloud Apple ID's per individual)
    I am relatively new to Apple and am exploring this idea keenly.
    What are the Advantages/Disadvantages for this particular scenario??
    Thanks a lot to those who kindly contribute your thoughts! 

    Basically 1 Device sharing 2 separate Apple ID's.
    1 For App Purchases.
    1 For iCloud.

  • What are advantages/disadvantages of getting iphone through Apple store vs. Verizon?

    What advantage/ disadvantage is there to getting an iphone 6 through the Apple store vs. Verizon? Currently my provider, single plan and eligible for an upgrade. Think the $60.00/month of unlimited talk,text and 2GB data is what I'm interested in with Verizon. Thank You.

    I can't think of any significant difference if both stores are in an equally convenient location for you other than if you plan to purchase AppleCare +, it might be slightly more convenient to buy the phone at the Apple Store and buy that at the same time. http://store.apple.com/us/product/S4575LL/A/applecare-for-iphone

  • What is the advantages/disadvantages of using BPEL only without BAM?

    What is the advantages/disadvantages of using BPEL only without BAM, and the combination for Error and Exception management in SOA?
    Please let me know if anybody had this experience?

    Hi,
    Both variants have pro's and cons. If you plan to use VBA you have to consider the deployment settings on other p.c.'s where you have to allow macro's where as a regular form doesn't have the need for that.
    That said the userform gives you much more control because the form command is not saved. it is simply a temporary form which you have to setup every time. It's perfect for data entry. If you are looking for data validation the userform is the one to go
    for. You also have the possibility to work on placements of the data entry.
    So if you are looking for speed and simplicity then go for the form command. If it is handling control you are after I'd go for a userform.
    Just my 2 cts
    Maurice
    When you see answers and helpful posts, please click Vote As Helpful, Propose As Answer, and/or Mark As Answer. Thank You

  • Converting RAW to DNG! What are the advantages / disadvantages?

    I have Canon cameras and shoot RAW, but the question itself is surely also valid for Nikon, Sony or other brand-shooters.
    When importing my pictures to Lightroom, I could convert them to DNG but didn't do this up to now, because I do not know what I loose. I suppose that I loose the ability to process my files with DPP, but I will not do that anyhow. I can appreciate the advantage of having the file in an open documented format, where even I could easily write a reader for it. So the answer should not be what I can easily find in the Adobe introduction into DNG. I have also the DNG specification in front of me, and I can read it, because I once wrote a program to read TIFF files. I understand that I could add the original RAW image stream, but I do not want using up the space wasted for this. I know, that all development parameters used for the specific RAW image can be written with the image file instead of having those stored in a database or a side-car-file.
    But what I did not find until now a technical explanation about what happens during the convert. Who can enlighten me? Where do I find the missing technical explanations?
    Thanks in advance!
    Lucien.

    Feierwoon wrote:
    That wasn't the question... .
    Based on the title of the thread and your initial post, it seems like your question had a lot of
    "What are the advantages / disadvantages?"
    in it, and only a little
    "What happens at a technical level when converting"
    But if you want more detailed info about conversion, and you have the aptitude to understand, I recommend doing what Lr5user-pt recommended:
    Download the DNG SDK and dig in - all your questions will be answered (and if not, you can also ask DNG-specific technical questions in the DNG forum).
    As far as my "sources" regarding the technical summary I presented, they are many and varied, none of which are the DNG SDK. In other words, my knowledge is based more on experience over the years - I don't know all the details under the hood..
    Some experiments to consider doing:
    * exiftool (-X) a proprietary raw file, then convert to DNG and repeat.
    * open a proprietary raw in a DNG-supporting software of your choice and inspect metadata, then open the converted DNG in the same software and re-evaluate. Compare to proprietary raw opened in manufacturer's software, and what you see via exiftool.
    Tom Hogarty (Lightroom project manager) and others who know have said: "DNG converter discards no metadata", and I believe them, but haven't verified for myself. Yet once proprietary metadata is in the DNG, most (all?) software will no longer decode it. A prime example is focus points - presumably they're there, but once converted, focus point feature is no longer supported. The amount of work required to support converted focus point data is unknown (to me), but as far as I know, no software has ventured to do it. If you want focus points, don't convert.
    If you want the truth, I think for most people it's "not wise" to convert to DNG. Why? because unless you already know why you are converting (and need to convert to satisfy your goals), or you already know why you must NOT convert (e.g. so you can open the files in mfr.software, and see focus points..) the pros and cons are likely to be a wash, and now you have twice the number of raw files, unless you discard your originals, which would be REALLY "not wise", in my opinion. If you find the notion of "openly documented format" sufficiently compelling, then, ya know, more power to ya (I don't judge..), but there is no guarantee that DNG will outlast NEF (or..), and if it does, there will be ample opportunity to convert before you're left in the cold, unless you're stuck in a cave for a few decades, or are kryogenically frozen.. True, if all companies die, you may be able to write your own DNG converter (/reader), given the DNG documentation, but FWIW, NEF is also thoroughly documented (document is in freely downloadable SDK), and reverse engineerable (that's what Adobe and Phil Harvey does), so you could also write your own NEF converter, so not really a very compelling argument, not this year anyway - ask me again in a few decades..
    If filesize is a main draw, then be sure NOT to save the hi-rez previews in your DNGs, otherwise you've just lost most or all of the filesize advantage. Also, you can strip previews from some proprietary raws (e.g. NEFs), to reduce filesize.
    Personally, if DNG supported sidecars, I would be more likely to convert, because file-management/backup is only an issue if you "forget" about xmp sidecars (and I do not forget), and I'd rather have my xmp in separate ready-to-read xml text files, rather than embedded in binary files, but hey, that's me..
    PS - I always use/encourage-others-to-use DNG when distributing raws to others for use in Adobe software, so xmp is not separate and can not get lost.
    PPS - proprietary raws and dngs are both just glorified tiff files - raw data, previews, and metadata..
    Don't get me wrong: I am NOT anti-DNG, and in fact - just the opposite: I am PRO dng, it's just that I wouldn't (don't) convert my own raws to DNG at this point. If you find the reasons to convert now are sufficiently compelling, you have my complete support and cooperation, fwiw..
    Cheers,
    Rob

Maybe you are looking for

  • Cannot switch between WPA2 and WPA Enterprise WiFi locations.

    Hello Everyone, I have two Wifi locations I use, a WPA2 and a WPA Enterprise. When I switch locations from one to the other it looks as if that the Airport express resets but does not let go of the active location. I have to manually turn airport off

  • 500 Internal Server Error Failed to process request. in ESS Travel req form

    Dear Gurus , Please can someone help me out here....I have problem for my ESS and MSS portal, but when I click on TRAVEL AND EXPENSES, and go down to MY TRIPS and EXPENSES, I sure get to see all the Travel Requests I have created, but when click on D

  • Audio technica turntable to mac mini

    please help me sync my audio technica at-lp60, non usb turntable to my mac mini using garage band or itunes. i was told i could use either but i cant get mac to recognize the turntable. please be specific with each step because i am not tech savvy. t

  • Crashed during update

    Aaarrrgghh 2008 macbookpro, 4gb, lion OSX Just ran software update, found new iTunes and safari, will ned restart. Set it off uploading, downloaded software, and was in the middle of the upgrade screen when the screen went black. Hadn't noticed it, b

  • HT4061 i phone stuck in recovery mode

    I upgraded to iOS 6 this morning and my phone is now stuck with the apple on the screen?