XI doubt and test scenario

Hi,
I need some advice on the following:
We are having XI 3.0, ECC 5.0 and also have GIS Server (Gentran). We need to use these servers to convert the data from XML to IDOC (inbound to sap) as well as to XML from IDOC (outbound). We came to know GIS will take care of converting the outside data to XML and send it across to XI as IDOC as well as take the IDOC from XI and convert it as XML before sending data outside. The question is what are the configuration to be done in ECC, XI and GIS to make the things happen. Do we need to use any adapter or XI itself has got any inbuilt adapter ? is there any blog or any link to any document which tells about configuration and any test scenario to try the above mentioned scenario ?
At present not much data's in ECC system, in this case is there any test scenario provided by SAP in XI or ECC to test some initial scenario like sending data from ECC to XI as an IDOC for file integration...
Let me know if any more information required from my side.
Thanks

Hi Aravind,
You can navigate through these links to get the details you require:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/d7/f01a403233dd5fe10000000a155106/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/14/80243b4a66ae0ce10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
Regards,
Chandra

Similar Messages

Test scenario and test plan

Hi All,
Can somebody explain what is a test scenario and test plan with an eg ( For eg FB 60). and what are the essential things one needs to incorporate for test scenario and a test plan
Appreciate your help.
Thanks
SM

Hi,
I am giving you the information on test plan and test scenario below. Please note that this is with reference to Solution Manager.
You create a test plan for a project in the SAP Solution Manager if you want to reuse the project structure created in the Business Blueprint for a process-oriented test. You can select all the test cases and transactions which you have assigned to the project structure, for the test plan. These test cases are performed by testers; they can call assigned transactions and run test cases in them.
Test Scenarios are nothing but the end to end business processes which are to be tested.
Hope this helps.
Rgds
Manish

Performence test and dcoument scenarios

Hi Experts,
i need Performence test and dcoument scenarios of the G/L Entry both ledgers.
any one please send one Performence test and dcoument scenario.( Related document)
Regards
Msr

I think as a BW user , you are supposed to do a application level checkout of the systems after BASIS finished the update.
Application level checkout is done to make sure that the connections between source systems, between BI (dev, test, prod) systems.
Application level check usually requires you to confirm to BASIS regarding ALE , TRFC level communications between systems.
A simple test would be to execute a simple known infopackage and verify the data from source systems. This verifies the conncetion between source and BI systems.
A transport between BI systems checks connections between them. Make sure that u donot transport into production before testing in CONS.
--Thanks
IM

Change Management and Test Workbench for documentation

Hi,
I would like some clarification on the association between change requests and test workbench.
I'm going through scenarios such as creating a maintenance project, creating a task list and service message and then creating a transport request.
During these steps, I want to document the test results prior to migrating these transports into the production system.
My questions are - how do you link the maintenance project and also urgent corrections to a test procedure and documentation. It appears that by using solar01/solar02 and stwb_2/stwb_work, these tests are linked to a project and not necessarily a "change request"
I greatly appreciate if you can elaborate the association between the various areas a bit clearer for me.
Thanks!!!

You need to look for information on usage type "DI", "Development Infrastructure" or "NWDI" (all common abbreviations for the same thing). There were some very good presentations on NWDI at TechEd this year.
Here are some links to help documentation:
<a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/63/7a4d40eae76f13e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm">Administration of the Development Infrastructure</a>
<a href="http://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/developersguide">SDN NetWeaver Developers Guide</a>
Rich

ABAP HR-test scenario for payslip-urgent

Hi,
please send me some test scenarios for payslip by which payslip can be affected.
I have designed a PAyslip with retro and i want to test it.
eg. retro. means if retro will run then it will affect payslip.
Also send me some unit test cases in case of any payslip requirement.
Points will be rewarded.
Regards
Monika

Hi,
Just give an entry in infotype 8, 14 or 15 for previous month and run the payroll than retro will run, than compare results using wage type reporter.
When you run the payroll give the sandard SAP Remuneration and compare the results in the SAP payslip and payslip you have developed.
If you have developed payslip using PE51 than the retro amounts are picked authomatically.
Regards,
Ramu N.

Idoc-XI-file test scenario

i m new to XI,
i wanna make a test scenario for idoc-XI-file...
i donno what an idoc is.......
tell me how to create an idoc from the very basics....like message type, segment, partner profile, port creation, etc,..... and how to fire an idoc from the R3 system to my XI system,
and ofcourse... ican do the rest of mapping and all, with the file message type

Hi Sudeep,
1. steps for creating customized Idocs..
we31- creation of Segments
we30- creation idoc types
we81- creation of Message types
we82- assigning message type to Idoc type...
2. R/3 Configuration settings
SM59 - creation of RFC destination...
we20 - creation of Ports
We21 - Creation of Partner profiles..
3. XI Configuration settings
SM59 - Maintain RFC destination,
IDX1 - Maintaining port for XI
IDx2 - Loading the Idocstructure into metadata repository
These are the settings to be done before starting ur scenario..
I think this will help you... points...
regds,
vasanth.

Auto router release in AP Invoice Test Scenario

Hi Gurus,
Please guide me how to prepare test script for Auto router release in AP Invoice Test Scenario.
Thanks for the Support.
Regards,
Bapu

hi,
It can be auto released only in the following case:
Original PO - 500$
When you have the IR for 1000$..
case 1:
You make the changes in the PO and give price as 1000$...
Or...
Case 2.. make the subsequent credit in the mean time for 500$..
So after this when you visit the MRBR tcode, system will auto release it...and the reasons becomes invalid over a time period...
Regards
Priyanka.P

Test scenarios in WM

Hi Guys
Please any body can provide all Test scenarios in WM Like BIN-BIN transfer
Inbound ,outbound delivery,PP,SD,MM integrations.
Thanks in advance
SAP MM

Hi Santosh,
Help.sap provides us more details in this section
ID point
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/c6/f846aa4afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
Pick Point
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/c6/f847124afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
Two step picking
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_45b/helpdata/en/c6/f842744afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/content.htm
You can use ID/Pick point :
     If Incoming stock is following some process but its not the final destination
     Example for this could be say, X-ray scanning of incoming Boxes
     Weighing of Incoming/outgoing goods (mostly followed in case of tanks)
     When means of transport gets changed ..i.e. from fork lift to conveyor
There can be more specific Business scenarios where we can turn this functionality as per our requirment.
The only difference in ID point / Pick point is ID point does not need SU mgmt where as if you are working with Pick point you must activate SU mgmt
For two step picking ..as name suggests its carried out in two steps .this is used in case of multiple processing where wave picking / zone picking is applicable. This can be mapped for Deliveries and also for TR. Here intrim storage type 200 plays an important role , this is an logical storage type. Steps involved here is Pick & allocation.
First you Pick , stock gets posted at 200 with dynamic quant refernce number as Bin , perform the operation like Labelling , Putting Bar-code , Inspection etc . once everything is okay you confirm the TO & allocate to final destination.
Generally two step picking is used where less time is consumed at logical storage type.
Thanks,
mahesh

Question of SAP Methodology of Implementation esp. System Testing and Test Script

Dear SAP Member,
As a very new and inexperienced customer to the SAP and the business. My company is preparing for the retail shop establishment which part of the preparation includes SAP implementation.
At first, we strongly believe SAP can fit and serve our business need well. Also, the standard methodology of implementation will be able to deliver the system with expected quality. However, the local implementor disappoint my firm with poor quality delivery and control that result in the perception of uncertainty of the system to be lived.
The methodology proposed by the implementor composed with
1) Preparation
2) Blueprint
3) Realization
a) Program development and unit test by vendor
b) Training
4) Final Preparation
a) Integration test by Users
b) Data conversion preparation
5) Go-Live and Support
My problem comes up with phase 4-5
Problem 1: Unit/functional test performed by implementor . For this activities, how could customer ensure that every single function has been developed or implemented according to the requirement and without error?
Problem 2: Vendor provides slot for integration test for 7 days. Is it normal practice that test can be done within this short period?
Problem 3: Does SAP methodology has the standard quality control, test enter and exit criteria and issue/incident management?
Problem 4: How should the standard test script look like? What i received from implementor was like functional list rather than script.
Problem 5: what should be step for conversion apart from the data preparation by users? The local implementor does not explain/elaborate the detailed activities.
Last but not least, as the customer do not satisfy with the SAP partner (local implementor quality). What should be the process for feedback as to prevent other new customer to face the same problem?
SK

SK,
Thamil has given his view. Here is another.
how could customer ensure that every single function has been developed or implemented according to the requirement and without error?
If this is an issue to you, you can insist that members of your test team participate in unit testing. You are, after all, the client, and it is your money being spent. As long as you can furnish testers, who are competent to evaluate unit testing scenarios, you can have them work with the vendor during unit testing.
Vendor provides slot for integration test for 7 days. Is it normal practice that test can be done within this short period?
It depends on what is being implemented. I have seen implementations which contained over a hundred test scenarios and over 2000 test scripts; each of which must be tested by multiple functional groups. 1 week is not enough to complete Integration testing in this case.
Also remember that it is necessary to allow time to correct 'bugs' found during integration testing, and then to re-test after the bugs are fixed. Except in the simplest of implementations, 1 week may not be enough to accommodate the bug fixes and retests.
Does SAP methodology has the standard quality control, test enter and exit criteria and issue/incident management?
Which 'SAP methodology' are you talking about? Bottom line, the client must insist that the vendor incorporate any methodologies that are required for his business. Don't assume that your vendor will automatically bring these items to the table, YOU may have to bring them to the table.
How should the standard test script look like? What I received from implementer was like functional list rather than script.
????? It should look like whatever you want it to look like. Many companies have existing templates. If your company doesn't have such a template, ask your vendor for one. Go over it together with him and make appropriate modifications that meet your business requirements.
what should be step for conversion apart from the data preparation by users? The local implementer does not explain/elaborate the detailed activities.
It is impossible to say at the beginning of the project. Sometime during realization, the client and the vendor will jointly develop a detailed cutover plan. More importantly, the client will develop a change management plan for the client company, in which all stakeholders in the client company will come to understand how and when ALL of the client's business processes will need to change, and to develop plans for all affected groups.
Best Regards,
DB49

Test scenario for payslip testing

Hi,
please send me some test scenarios for payslip by which payslip can be affected.
eg. retro. means if retro will run then it will affect payslip.
Also send me some unit test cases in case of any payslip requirement.
Regards

Hi,
Just give an entry in infotype 8, 14 or 15 for previous month and run the payroll than retro will run, than compare results using wage type reporter.
When you run the payroll give the sandard SAP Remuneration and compare the results in the SAP payslip and payslip you have developed.
If you have developed payslip using PE51 than the retro amounts are picked authomatically.
Regards,
Ramu N.

JDBC Sample Test Scenario

Hi All,
Could any one guide us to some successfully working Sample Test Scenario Documents for SAP XI 3.0 using JDBC Adapter which we need to work on asap.
Thanks in advance,
Venkat!.

Hi All,
I am working on a jdbc to file scenario, Now that I am trying to connect to MSaccess, I have provided the following driver and connection parameters.
Database is in my local machine
Driver: jdbc.odbc.JdbcOdbcDriver
Connection url: jdbc:odbc:Driver={Microsoft Access Driver (*.mdb)};DBQ=D:/database_emp/EMP_Details.mdb
with table as EMPLOYEE
select query as SELECT * FROM EMPLOYEE WHERE FLAG='No'
Update as UPDATE EMPLOYEE SET FLAG='Yes' WHERE FLAG='No'
Having given that, when i m executing the scenario I am getting the following error
Error during database connection to the database URL 'jdbc:odbc:Driver={Microsoft Access Driver (.mdb)};DBQ=D:/database_emp/EMP_Details.mdb' using the JDBC driver 'jdbc.odbc.JdbcOdbcDriver': 'com.sap.aii.adapter.jdbc.sql.DriverManagerException: Cannot establish connection to URL 'jdbc:odbc:Driver={Microsoft Access Driver (.mdb)};DBQ=D:/database_emp/EMP_Details.mdb': SQLException: [Microsoft][ODBC Driver Manager] Data source name not found and no default driver specified'
in the sender CC.
Please help.
Regards,
Nithiyanandam
Edited by: Nithiyanandam A.U. on Jan 19, 2009 11:02 AM

DataSource / Structures mismatched between Dev and Test Systems. ..!!

Hi,
We are doing a scenario. Where XI will update the data into PSA through ABAP proxy.
Scenario worked perfectly in development system.
We transported the objects from Dev to test. The Strucures are mismatched in SE11 between development and Test systems as below.
Data sources (ZDS_RECIHDR and ZDS_RECTPALL) looks ok. But when I saw the structures in SE11 they are not correct, they got mismatched.
Development:
/BIC/CQZDS_REC00001000 - Header (ZDS_RECIHDR)
/BIC/CQZDS_REC00003000 - Allocation (ZDS_RECTPALL)
Test:
/BIC/CQZDS_REC00001000 - Allocation (ZDS_RECTPALL)
/BIC/CQZDS_REC00003000 - Header (ZDS_RECIHDR)
Kindly let me know where it might have gone wrong?
Thanks
Deepthi

We done it already. Still it is failing.
While transporting, it is failing and showing the error as
Program ZPI_CL_IA_PAYMENT_ALLOCATION1=CP, Include ZPI_CL_IA_PAYMENT_ALLOCATION1=CM001: Syntax error in line 000016
The data object 'L_S_DATA' has no component called'/BIC/ZSALENUM', but there is a component called
Program ZPI_CL_IA_PAYMENT_HEADER======CP, Include ZPI_CL_IA_PAYMENT_HEADER======CM001: Syntax error in line 000016
The data object 'L_S_DATA' has no component called'/BIC/ZTRANDATE', but there are the following com
The Structure is mismatched in SE11 between header and allocation structures. That is the reason it is failing.
Any more ideas pls?

[svn] 2649: Committing Josh McDonald' s patch for bug SDK-15795 after review and testing.

Revision: 2649
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2008-07-29 09:33:23 -0700 (Tue, 29 Jul 2008)
Log Message:
Committing Josh McDonald's patch for bug SDK-15795 after review and testing. Various minOccurs and maxOccurs scenarios could lead to short circuit logic that would not release the schema stack scope if a reference was previously resolved.
Checkintests: Pass
BlazeDS 3.0.x webService flexunit tests: 100% Pass
BlazeDS 3.0.x webService mxunit tests: 100% Pass
QE: Yes, please review schema that is described in this bug and consider adding a test case. Note that I'm seeing intermittent failures on a few tests that pass when re-run (likely due to timeouts being too aggressive?).
Doc: No
Reviewer: Svetlin
Bugs:
SDK-15795 - minOccurs on breaks XMLEncoder
Ticket Links:
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-15795
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-15795
Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/branches/3.0.x/frameworks/projects/rpc/src/mx/rpc/xml/XMLEncoder.as

Hi.
Alot of good feedback. Personally I miss some keybindings, such as for branch switching.
Anyways, on the github corruption issue it seems like this was fixed in 0.8.4 according to http://www.eclipse.org/forums/index.php?t=msg&th=183637& amp;start=0&S=81dfec74c1b979b21614f923fb09b1da

Partial quantity of Material in Extended and Classic Scenarios

Does it possible to pass partial quantity of Material into Extended and Classic Scenario ;for instance we have 100 qty for a material & out of them 60 qty goes to Extended PO and 40 qty goes to Classic in backend system .
If yes so how & what criteria would be ?

Hi Lalit,
Until now we did not use both classic and extended classic for one organization.
Are you using that or you just have a doubt??
Regards,
Satish

Test Scenario Error

Hello All ~
I am a novice to DocuMaker Studio and I am trying to run a test scenario but keep getting the following error. Can anyone shed some light?
[12:17:56PM] Error: Write Exception at 0x0039e27c - Attempted to Write to 0x00000000
[12:17:56PM] Error: An exception occurred in Gendata.
Thanks

> The Program name which you have defined in the TCP/IP
> Connection needs to be registered in the J2EE Visual
> Admin. until you do that this will not work.
This is not needed at all.
Your RFC adapter and the TCP IP Connection should use the same Program ID. No need for registering it in the VA.
Just make sure that the Gateway Host and Service in the Sender RFC adapter and in the TCP IP Connection use the Gateway Host and service of the R3 system.
Regards
Bhavesh

XI doubt and test scenario

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for