XI IDoc Acknowledgement - Acknowledgement not possible status

Hi Experts,
My scenario:
SAP IDOC - XI - jdbc (oracle)
Problem:
Getting the infamous "Acknowledgement not possible" status in SXI_MONI. I only need the transport acknowledgements back to SAP not the application acknowledgements. The messages themselves route fine from source to destination.

check if this blog helps you:
/people/saravanakumar.kuppusamy2/blog/2005/01/20/configuration-tips-for-a-business-serviceintegration-process-to-send-back-ale-audit-idoc
From the blog:
The system acknowledgement sent by the file adapter is converted into an ALE audit message and sent
back to the sender SAP system by an IDOC ACK channel configured in XI(an IDOC receiver adapter).
For your info:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/903a0abc-e56e-2910-51a8-9dc616df56eb
Edited by: abhishek salvi on May 15, 2009 10:48 AM

Similar Messages

  • IDoc - JDBC, acknowledgment not possible

    Hi Guys.
    I've this scenario, It makes a branch, to a BPM and to a JDBC. The problem is, i got an error at the JDBC acknowledgment response (Acknowledgment not possible)
                            IDOC
    Branch
                   BPM                 JDBC
              No errors              Acknowledgment
            in acknowledgment        not possible
    This scenario was made by a external consultant, and i don't know where is the JDBC acknowledgment defined.
    Does anyone know, where can i modified this and disable the acknowledgment response for the JDBC?
    Thanks in advance.

    HI,
    Go to BPM and check the Send Step .. Is it has mode as acknowledgement etc ?
    Also check is Exception Branch has been defined ?
    to suppress the ack for Idoc -[page no 10 - entry in table IDXNOALE in XI system
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f6d2d790-0201-0010-9382-b50b499b3fbe
    Regards,
    Moorthy

  • Acknowledgment not possible ..File adapter ..receiver side

    Hi XI Friends
    In my Simple IDOC to File Scenario...
    i am getting successfull meessage in SXMB_MONI.but in sxmb_moni ,the acknowledgment status is not possible.
    my inbound inteface is of file and asynchrounous type.
    how can i get acknowledgment .
    please guid me.
    thanks and regards
    Ram

    Hi,
    File adapter does not support  Application Acknowledgements.
    In your case, turn of the Acknowledgements, by adding the entry in the table <b>IDXNOALE</b> in XI  for the Sender Port and idoc type. After this, the Acknowledgement column in MONI will be empty.
    Regards,
    Bhavesh

  • Acknowledgment not possible

    Hi all,
    I am doing IDOc to Soap scenario. the scenario working perfectly and data is updatain in target side also. But in SXmb_moni its showing Ack status as "Acknowledgment not possible". What is the reason could you please explain me and how to rectify this...
    waiting for you valuable information.
    Regards,
    Kum

    Hi,
    this should be helpful:
    ALEAUD not coming to SAP from XI & u0093Acknowledgment not possible" in idx5
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f6d2d790-0201-0010-9382-b50b499b3fbe
    Regards
    Patrick
    Edited by: Patrick Koehnen on May 5, 2008 3:03 PM

  • Acknowledgement not possible though the message was sent successfully

    Hello Everyone,
    I have the following scenario below.
    Sender = R/3
    Interface = IDoc - stored procedure
    Receiver = JDBC Adapter
    I need 2 kind of acknowledgements.
    1. If the message got an mapping error in XI/PI we need to send "any kind of ack" back to the R/3 to inform the Team that something happens during the mapping.
    I do get a ALEAUD success message when a IDOC is sent to PI .
    2. If everything is ok and the message was sent to the MSSQL- I gett an error like "Acknowledgement not possible". AnywayIi don´t need a ack if mapping in XI/PI is successful as it is a asynchronous scenario.
    I think it is trying to send back an ack because i have a receiver IDOC channel defined for the R/3 receiver.
    How can I get rid of this Acknowledgement not possible  information ?
    Thank you ,
    Teresa

    chk this:
    1)    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/903a0abc-e56e-2910-51a8-9dc616df56eb
    2)  To suppress ack maintain the entries in table IDXNOALE (DO not request ack)

  • IDOC Negative acknowledge not triggering system Exception

    Hi guys,
    I've a send step in my BPM which sends an IDOC and waits for the application acknowledge.  After watching several threads, and specially SAP Note 837285, we can read that:
    "Permanent negative acknowledgements: If the BPE receives a
    permanent negative system or application acknowledgment, the
    asynchronous send step waiting for it triggers a system error for
    which you can define an exception handling."
    Well, in my send step I've placed a system exception for handling this negative acknowledges but eventough I'm getting the negative application acknowlege from R3 (in SXMB_MONI I get the ack figure with a red cross indicating 'Ackonwledgment contains applic. errors'), the BPE doesn't trigger the system exception. Instead it enters in my deadline branch after quite a long time, ending the process....
    Can you guys give me a hand?

    Hi Ravi,
    What is happening is:
    After the idoc reaches R3, the Send step begins waiting for the ALEAUD ack from R3. I've got a System Exception for handling negative acks and a deadline branch for communication errors during the sending step... Meanwhile, the negative ack reaches XI (I can see it on the SXMB_MONI of XI) but the send step still waits for the ack. Of course, after the timeframe which was set for the deadline branch, the bpm will be completed because it jumps to that branch.
    I can't figure it out why isn't the BPM catching the negative acknowledges..... :S If the acknowledge is error-free, the send step catches it and proceeds to the next step....
    Any ideas? suggestions....? crazy attempts....?
    The only point possible is the acknowledge received not being a permanent negative ack but a transient negative ack.... How can I check this IMPORTANT point.... ?
    Message was edited by:
            Gonçalo Mouro Vaz

  • Acknowledgement not possible

    Hi Experts,
    Scenario : IDOC to JMS
    when i trigger the idoc the message successfully sent to Moni but, i need to get the symbol of still awaiting acknowledgement  instead of that am getting Acknowledgement not possible.
    Please suggest me how can i do that..
    Thanks & Regards,
    Y.Raj.

    But, R/3 system should get an default acknowledgement right when it reaches to XI either it's JMS and vice versa and i could have seen some of the interfaces which is related to IDOC to JMS which gets an acknowledgement to R/3
    Regards,
    Y.Raj.
    Edited by: YeswanthRaj Kumar on Oct 6, 2008 2:42 PM

  • Http to file scenario generate "Acknowledgement not possible"?

    Hi.
    On PI7.1 we built a http to file scenario and used the RWB "Test message" functionality to test the interface.
    Now we get a "Acknowledgement not possible" in sxmb_moni. How can we switch this off.
    thanks

    Hi
    while sending request use either EO or EOIO for Asynch.
    EO and EOIO, processing occurs asynchronously and the client only receives a confirmation of receipt with HTTP status u2018200u2019.
    Read this
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/43/64db4daf9f30b4e10000000a11466f/content.htm

  • SXMB_MONI - weird message "Acknowledgement not possible"

    Hi All,
    I Am working on an async scenario of:
    ERP -> IDOC -> XI -> PlainHTTP -> 3RDPARTY
    I have now got the original message doing all that I want it to, I create it in the ERP system, it goes through XI and ends up at the right place. But I had a few problems with Acknowledgements. First off I had the seemingly infamous "Unable to convert the sender service to an ALE logical system" error, but by searching through the forum and some useful weblogs (thanks Michal..) was able to sort this out (still find it far from obvious that a 3rd party system needs an LS..).
    And now my ALE Ack is (seemingly) successfully going back into my ERP system and if I look with Transaction WE05 it says it was processed successfully (code 53, using process code AUD1), plus in the RWB the acknowledgement is shown as having been processed successfully, but SXMB_MONI still shows the icon and message "Acknowledgement not possible" in the list of XML messages, although when I look at the details there are no errors... it is weird and I am tempted to ignore it as it does not seem to be causing any issues but I would love to know why it still displays this message.. any ideas?
    Many thanks,
    Chris

    Hey,
    Thanks Udo, I kind of suspected that it was ignorable but it is always nice to see only green lights and clean messages in RWB... So I will move on.. but am still a little confused though, as to what it means to say that acknowledgements are not supported? I can see that an acknowledgment is being created, sent and accepted back into the Sender system (which suggests a certain level of support for acknowledgements..)
    So does that mean there are further acks that could/should be sent but are not supported? The acknowledgment documentation I have found does not seem clear on this. Perhaps I am getting the Ack from the IS but not from the plain Http adapter??
    Many thanks for your help,
    Chris

  • BPM  - IDOC System Acknowledgements from R/3

    Hi My scenario is File-XI/BPM-R/3(Idocs).
    In Integration process, we configured 'system ack' in Send Step which sends Idocs to R/3 system.
    BPM Process stays in 'STARTED' state forever though XI received acknowledgement ( in SXMB_MONI, on the main screen ACk Status is in '?'mark meaning its still waiting for Acknowledgement. But the moment you click on the message Ack status becomes 'Ack received' and BPM ends".
    This seems to be a bug.
    How can the Acknowledement staus changes the moment you clike on the message?. Does anyone have same issue?. Any suggestion will be appreciated. we are on PI7.0 sps6.0 environment.
    <b>we donot want to deal with ALEUPD..so please do not suggest to config  ALEUPD.</b>

    HI,
    see the below
    The Business Process Engine supports Acknowledgments when sending asynchronously as follows:
    Acknowledgment------     Processing of Send Step
    Receiver system does not support requested acknowledgments ---     Send step completed successfully
    Positive acknowledgment----
         Send step completed successfully
    Permanent negative acknowledgment------     Send step triggers system error for which you can define a specific exception handling.
    Temporary (transient) negative acknowledgment-------     Send step continues to wait because the temporary acknowledgment can still change to a permanent or negative acknowledgment. This can occur in the IDoc environment in particular, for example, when a user intervenes.
    Exception or error handling within the integration process is not possible. However, using message monitoring you can determine whether the acknowledgment is temporary or not.
    Acknowledgment with multiple receivers     A message sent from a send step can have multiple receivers. In this case, the system duplicates the message accordingly. Acknowledgments returned from the respective receivers are ignored and the send step continues to wait.
    If multiple receivers are possible and you want to evaluate the individual acknowledgments, you must define the integration process accordingly. To do this, determine the receivers in a receiver determination step and send the message to the individual receivers in a loop.
    For more information about acknowledgments, in particular how they are used in the adapter environment,
    Note: see SAP Note 837285.
    Regards
    Chilla

  • About IDoc to file scenarios, ack not possible

    I almost work out this scenario except one error in XI, T-Code SXMB_MONI
    Acknowledgment not possible
    detail info is "Unable to convert the sender service FTP to an ALE logical system".
    Because I create two business service for SAP ERP and FTP, no technical system in SLD.
    Of course I assign the Logical system name to SAP ERP, and FTP has no Adapter specific identifiers.
    It is not Ok to create another Logical system and partner profile for this.
    Is there any expert can tell me what to do in this situation?
    Thanks for any suggestion.

    > detail info is "Unable to convert the sender service FTP to an ALE logical system".
    >
    > Because I create two business service for SAP ERP and FTP, no technical system in SLD.
    > Of course I assign the Logical system name to SAP ERP, and FTP has no Adapter specific identifiers.
    > It is not Ok to create another Logical system and partner profile for this.
    > Is there any expert can tell me what to do in this situation?
    >
    you need to do HEADER MAPPING in Receiver Agreement. Just define the sender logical system there and your problem will be solved...

  • IDOC Error - Entry in outbound table not found - Status 37

    Hello,
    we try to generate the IDOC in a Test Tool WE19. I always get the same error "Entry in outbound table not found" - Status 37. I tried already many config changes (Partner, Ports, Distribution Modell...).
    The thing is that the IDOC should be sent on external system (non-SAP System) but also the IDOC should be write to file. The external system should later on catch the IDOC and process the data.
    I suppose the problem is the fact that we send it to external non-SAP System. I add as Port Data and the source where the IDOC shoud be generated. The Partner that I choose is logical system. However I dont specify the RFC Connection because the file should only be saved and not send directly on the external system. Is it possible or maybe I need to specify the IP-Adress of the external system?
    When it works I need to generate the IDOC as service management IW32. I try it with TA IORD. I get the message "rejected". Probably because of the error in the test tool WE19.
    I am already fighting on it for many hours...
    Thank you in advance
    Michael

    Hi
    In we 19
    Receiver
    Port: A port created in R/3 referencing RFC dest pointing to XI.
    Partner no: LS of XI (CLNT100)
    Partner Type: LS
    Sender
    Partner no: LS of R/3 (RD1CLNT500)
    Partner Type: LS
    Message Type is DESADV
    Basic DELVRY05
    and i am sending blank idoc for testing.
    Regards
    Monika

  • Idoc mbgmcr02 movement type 311 ..  goods movement not possible w/mvmt type

    i am using we19 to create a test idoc...i have the ports and partners filled in...i am using movement type 311..i have the material , the plant, the storage location...the qty..i have the move material, the move plant and move storage location filled in...
    when i use standard inbound processing it generates the idoc..i go to we02 and look at the idoc..in the status records i get status 51 goods movement not possible with mvmt type 311..????what am i missing
    if i do the exact same thing with the transaction migo...works fine...
    am i missing something????

    i am trying to move material from one location to another using IDOC MBGMCR02..
    I am entering the following...
    E1BP2017_GM_Code=04
    in e1BP2017_GM_ITEM_Create
      Material=CON2020
      Plant=3000
      Stg_Loc=0001
      Move_Type=311
      Entry Qty=001
      Move_Mat=Con2020
      Move_Plant=3000
      Move_Stloc=0002
      Mvt_Ind=??????
      In the Mvt_Ind I have tried E,K,M,Q
      the in get a status 51 Update Control of Movement Type is incorrect(entry311XX_K)....
      Is E1BP2017_GM_CODE = 4 correct???
      What should be the Mvt_Ind???

  • Idoc INVOIC - error Tax entry not possible in this item - Message no. FF724

    Hello, 
    I have an idoc in error with the following error message.
    In the idoc type INVOIC
    Segment E1EDK04:
    MWSKZ     N1     VAT indicator
    MSATZ     19.000     VAT rate
    MWSBT     20.52     Value added tax amount
    In OBCD
    Partn.Type PartnerNo Tax type Tax rate Cty Tx
    LI         FNISL     N1       19.000       V2
    Input tax N6 is defined in the system with rate 19.000%
    Direction         2     Inbox
    Current status    51        
    Basic type        INVOIC01  
    Extension                   
    Message type      INVOIC    
    Partner No.       FNISL     
    Partn.Type        LI        
    Tax entry not possible in this item
    Message no. FF724
    Diagnosis
    You can not enter a tax amount in this item since, due to the posting amount entered and the tax code, a total tax amount of zero has been calculated.
    This could either be due to the fact that the tax code has been defined with a value of 0%, or because the posting amount entered (that is, the tax base) is too small.
    Example:
    With a tax rate of 15%, a tax amount greater than zero will only be achieved with a base amount greater than 0.04. With values of 0.03 and less, it is therefore not possible to enter a tax amount.
    Procedure
    Only enter tax amounts in conjunction with tax codes for which a percentage rate not equal to zero has been defined. Make sure that in documents with several G/L account items you enter the total tax amount in an item with a sufficiently high posting amount.
    do you have an idea to solve it?
    Regards
    Arnaud

    Message no. FF724
    Check note 681538
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • BSP: Use of dynpro services is not possible in the current system status

    Hello,
    in the component SRQM_INCIDENT_H i created a own button and eventhandler on the overview view.
    Here in this eventhandler i´m calling an own method from an own class. This method is doing a RFC in our ERP system.
    If i test the method this works fine.
    If i call this method in my eventhandler i get BSP error:
    Calling the BSP page was terminated due to an error.
    SAP Note
    The following error text was processed in the system:
    Use of dynpro services is not possible in the current system status
    Exception Class CX_SY_MESSAGE_IN_PLUGIN_MODE
    Error Name
    Program ZCL_CRM_CS_DATA_SERVICES======CP
    Include ZCL_CRM_CS_DATA_SERVICES======CM001
    ABAP Class ZCL_CRM_CS_DATA_SERVICES
    Method CREATE_CS_ORDER
    Line 54
    Long text -
    Error type: Exception
    Any ideas?
    thank you
    Best regards

    Hi,
           Web-UI cannot handle MESSAGE statements. if it's your own program, you should use the web-ui( view_manager->get_message_container or cl_crm_bol_core's global message container) alternatives to display the messages. If the message statement is being issued by a standard program, it's most usually deliberate attempt to fail on unrecoverable error. You can catch it by usin the try...catch CX_SY_MESSAGE_IN_PLUGIN_MODE ..where you call the standard functions.
    Regards,
    Arun Prakash

Maybe you are looking for

  • PowerMac G5 will not boot into Open Firmware, or Boot Manager

    I have a PowerMac G5 and it refuses to boot into Open Firmware. I used Command + Option + O + F and held down the Option key. I have tried 3 different Keyboards but no avail.

  • IPod reports 3.5 gig video loaded, but I a have no video synced to it (according to iTunes)

    I have combed thru everything I have set to sync to my nano, and confirmed ther eis NO video being synced, yet the summary shows 3.5 gig of video is loaded on it. That's a lot of space I would like to reclaim. Any ideas?

  • FileNotFound Exception - try,catch

    Hi, I am having the following problem: Original working code: public String[] SomeMethod(){ filename = dirname + ...blah blah blah..; return filename; New code: public String[] SomeMethod(){ filename = dirname + ...blah blah blah..; try{ Here I am op

  • Volume on new ipod.

    i recently sent in my ipod under the 6 months warranty, only to get one sent to me that works fine, except the volume is terribly messed up. It can be turned up a little but once you pass a certain point it stays there. the volume bar could show that

  • Repartitioning Problem - Indexes Rebuild

    Hi, I decided a QA Repartitioning Test prior to any Production activities and I am ending up with an index problem on my InfoCube.  The Repartitioning Monitor Shows everything Green as a final result.  Deeper in the logs there is a yellow warning tha